instruction stringlengths 55 58 | input stringclasses 1
value | output stringlengths 21 4k |
|---|---|---|
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2002-2438. | TCP firewalls could be circumvented by sending a SYN Packets with other flags (like e.g. RST flag) set, which was not correctly discarded by the Linux TCP stack after firewalling. | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2002-2439. | Integer overflow in the new[] operator in gcc before 4.8.0 allows attackers to have unspecified impacts. | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2002-2440. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2002-2441. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2002-2442. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2002-2444. | Snoopy before 2.0.0 has a security hole in exec cURL | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2003-0090. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2000-0844. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2000-0844. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2000-0844 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2003-0157. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2003-0138. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2003-0138 due to incomplete coordination. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2003-0138 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been ... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2003-0158. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2003-0139. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2003-0139 due to incomplete coordination. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2003-0139 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been ... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2003-0199. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2003. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2003-0200. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2003. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2003-0351. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2003-0306. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2003-0306. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2003-0306 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental u... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2003-0439. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2003. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2003-0463. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2003-0568. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2003. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2003-0569. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2003. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2003-0570. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2003. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2003-0571. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2003. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2003-0582. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2003-0504. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2003-0504. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2003-0504 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2003-0591. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate number that was created during the refinement phase. Notes: All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2003-0598. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2003-0657. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2003-0657. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2003-0657 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental u... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2003-0678. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2003. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2003-0684. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2003. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2003-0687. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate has been revoked by its Candidate Numbering Authority (CNA) because it was internally assigned to a problem that was not reachable (the affected routine was not used by the software). Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2003-0691. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not associated with any specific security issue. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2003-0698. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2003-0743. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2003-0743. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2003-0743 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2003-0741. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2003. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2003-0790. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: the reported issue is not a vulnerability or exposure. Notes: This candidate was assigned to a "head-reading" bug in a component of fetchmail 6.2.4 and earlier, which was claimed to allow a denial of service. However, the bug is in a broke... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2003-0798. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2003. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2003-0799. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2003. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2003-0800. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2003. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2003-0862. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2003-0813. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2003-0813. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2003-0813 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2003-0867. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2003-0662. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2003-0662. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2003-0662 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2003-0868. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2003. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2003-0869. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2003. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2003-0873. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2003. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2003-0879. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2003-0518. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2003-0518. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2003-0518 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental u... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2003-0917. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2003. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2003-0918. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2003. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2003-0919. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2003. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2003-0920. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2003. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2003-0921. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2003. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2003-0922. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2003. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2003-0923. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2003. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2003-0952. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2003. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2003-0953. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2003. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2003-0964. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: N/A. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2003-1047. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2004-0540. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2004-0540. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2004-0540 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2003-1130. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2003-1071. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2003-1071. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2003-1071 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2003-1147. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2003-0955. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2003-0955. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2003-0955 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2003-1217. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2003. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2003-1218. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2003. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2003-1565. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-1565. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2002-1565. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2002-1565 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2003-1600. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2003-1601. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2003-1602. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2003-1605. | curl 7.x before 7.10.7 sends CONNECT proxy credentials to the remote server. | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2003-20001. | An issue was discovered on Mitel ICP VoIP 3100 devices. When a remote user attempts to log in via TELNET during the login wait time and an external call comes in, the system incorrectly divulges information about the call and any SMDR records generated by the system. The information provided includes the service type, ... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2003-5001. | A vulnerability was found in ISS BlackICE PC Protection and classified as critical. Affected by this issue is the component Cross Site Scripting Detection. The manipulation as part of POST/PUT/DELETE/OPTIONS Request leads to privilege escalation. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to th... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2003-5002. | A vulnerability was found in ISS BlackICE PC Protection. It has been declared as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is the component Update Handler which allows cleartext transmission of data. NOTE: This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2003-5003. | A vulnerability was found in ISS BlackICE PC Protection. It has been rated as problematic. Affected by this issue is the Update Handler. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to cross site scripting. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. NOTE: This vul... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2004-0012. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2004. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2004-0076. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was removed from consideration by its Candidate Numbering Authority. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2004-0098. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2004. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2004-0140. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2004. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2004-0141. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2004. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2004-0142. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2004. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2004-0144. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2004. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2004-0145. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2004. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2004-0146. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2004. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2004-0147. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2004. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2004-0187. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2004-0185. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2004-0185. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2004-0185 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental u... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2004-0230. | TCP, when using a large Window Size, makes it easier for remote attackers to guess sequence numbers and cause a denial of service (connection loss) to persistent TCP connections by repeatedly injecting a TCP RST packet, especially in protocols that use long-lived connections, such as BGP. | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2004-0378. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2004. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2004-0406. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2004. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2004-0410. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2004-0449. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2004. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2004-0463. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2004. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2004-0464. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2004. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2004-0472. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2004-0434. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2004-0434 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2004-0499. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2004-0556. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2004. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2004-0562. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2004. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2004-0585. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2004-0589. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2004-0589. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2004-0589 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2004-0756. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2004. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2004-0818. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2004. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2004-0853. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2004. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2004-0854. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2004. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2004-0855. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2004. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2004-0856. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2004. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2004-0857. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2004. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2004-0858. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2004. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2004-0859. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2004. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2004-0860. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2004. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2004-0861. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2004. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2004-0868. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2004-0866. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2004-0866. Notes: The description for CVE-2004-0866 was inadvertently attached to this issue instead. All CVE users should reference CVE-2004-0866 instead of this candidate. All references and... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2004-0874. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2004-1123. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2004-1123. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2004-1123 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental u... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2004-0890. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reasons: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of another candidate. Notes: All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2004-0910. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2004-0815. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2004-0815. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2004-0815 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental u... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2004-0943. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.