instruction stringlengths 55 58 | input stringclasses 1
value | output stringlengths 21 4k |
|---|---|---|
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-1999-0020. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-1999-0032. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-1999-0032. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-1999-0032 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-1999-0110. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-1999-0315. Reason: This candidate's original description had a typo that delayed it from being detected as a duplicate of CVE-1999-0315. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-1999-0315 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions i... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-1999-0187. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-1999-0022. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-1999-0022. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-1999-0022 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-1999-0199. | manual/search.texi in the GNU C Library (aka glibc) before 2.2 lacks a statement about the unspecified tdelete return value upon deletion of a tree's root, which might allow attackers to access a dangling pointer in an application whose developer was unaware of a documentation update from 1999. | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-1999-0282. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-1999-1584, CVE-1999-1586. Reason: This candidate combined references from one issue with the description from another issue. Notes: Users should consult CVE-1999-1584 and CVE-1999-1586 to obtain the appropriate name. All references and descriptions ... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-1999-0335. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-1999-0032. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-1999-0032. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-1999-0032 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-1999-0531. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is solely about a configuration that does not directly introduce security vulnerabilities, so it is more appropriate to cover under the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE). Notes: the former description is: "An SMTP servic... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-1999-0614. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is solely about a configuration that does not directly introduce security vulnerabilities, so it is more appropriate to cover under the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE). Notes: the former description is: "The FTP servic... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-1999-0615. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is solely about a configuration that does not directly introduce security vulnerabilities, so it is more appropriate to cover under the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE). Notes: the former description is: "The SNMP servi... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-1999-0616. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is solely about a configuration that does not directly introduce security vulnerabilities, so it is more appropriate to cover under the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE). Notes: the former description is: "The TFTP servi... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-1999-0617. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is solely about a configuration that does not directly introduce security vulnerabilities, so it is more appropriate to cover under the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE). Notes: the former description is: "The SMTP servi... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-1999-0619. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is solely about a configuration that does not directly introduce security vulnerabilities, so it is more appropriate to cover under the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE). Notes: the former description is: "The Telnet ser... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-1999-0620. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is solely about a configuration that does not directly introduce security vulnerabilities, so it is more appropriate to cover under the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE). Notes: the former description is: "A component se... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-1999-0621. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is solely about a configuration that does not directly introduce security vulnerabilities, so it is more appropriate to cover under the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE). Notes: the former description is: "A component se... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-1999-0622. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is solely about a configuration that does not directly introduce security vulnerabilities, so it is more appropriate to cover under the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE). Notes: the former description is: "A component se... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-1999-0623. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is solely about a configuration that does not directly introduce security vulnerabilities, so it is more appropriate to cover under the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE). Notes: the former description is: "The X Windows ... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-1999-0631. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is solely about a configuration that does not directly introduce security vulnerabilities, so it is more appropriate to cover under the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE). Notes: the former description is: "The NFS servic... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-1999-0633. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is solely about a configuration that does not directly introduce security vulnerabilities, so it is more appropriate to cover under the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE). Notes: the former description is: "The HTTP/WWW s... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-1999-0634. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is solely about a configuration that does not directly introduce security vulnerabilities, so it is more appropriate to cover under the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE). Notes: the former description is: "The SSH servic... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-1999-0642. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is solely about a configuration that does not directly introduce security vulnerabilities, so it is more appropriate to cover under the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE). Notes: the former description is: "A POP service ... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-1999-0643. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is solely about a configuration that does not directly introduce security vulnerabilities, so it is more appropriate to cover under the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE). Notes: the former description is: "The IMAP servi... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-1999-0644. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is solely about a configuration that does not directly introduce security vulnerabilities, so it is more appropriate to cover under the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE). Notes: the former description is: "The NNTP news ... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-1999-0645. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is solely about a configuration that does not directly introduce security vulnerabilities, so it is more appropriate to cover under the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE). Notes: the former description is: "The IRC servic... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-1999-0646. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is solely about a configuration that does not directly introduce security vulnerabilities, so it is more appropriate to cover under the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE). Notes: the former description is: "The LDAP servi... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-1999-0647. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is solely about a configuration that does not directly introduce security vulnerabilities, so it is more appropriate to cover under the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE). Notes: the former description is: "The bootparam ... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-1999-0648. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is solely about a configuration that does not directly introduce security vulnerabilities, so it is more appropriate to cover under the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE). Notes: the former description is: "The X25 servic... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-1999-0649. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is solely about a configuration that does not directly introduce security vulnerabilities, so it is more appropriate to cover under the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE). Notes: the former description is: "The FSP servic... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-1999-0652. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is solely about a configuration that does not directly introduce security vulnerabilities, so it is more appropriate to cover under the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE). Notes: the former description is: "A database ser... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-1999-0655. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is not about any specific product, protocol, or design, so it is out of scope of CVE. Notes: the former description is: "A service may include useful information in its banner or help function (such as the name and version), ... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-1999-0658. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is solely about a configuration that does not directly introduce security vulnerabilities, so it is more appropriate to cover under the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE). Notes: the former description is: "DCOM is runnin... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-1999-0659. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is solely about a configuration that does not directly introduce security vulnerabilities, so it is more appropriate to cover under the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE). Notes: the former description is: "A Windows NT P... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-1999-0660. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is not about any specific product, protocol, or design, so it is out of scope of CVE. It might be more appropriate to cover under the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE). Notes: the former description is: "A hacker utilit... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-1999-1056. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-1999-1395. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-1999-1395. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-1999-1395 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-1999-1108. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-1999-1107. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-1999-1107. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-1999-1107 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-1999-1310. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-1999-1022. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-1999-1022. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-1999-1022 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-1999-1594. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-1999-1595. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-1999-1596. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-1999-1597. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-1999-1598. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2000-0744. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2000-0743. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2000-0743. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2000-0743 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2000-1248. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2000-1249. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2000-1250. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2000-1251. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2000-1252. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2001-0654. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2001. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2001-0655. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2001. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2001-0656. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2001. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2001-0657. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2001. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2001-0798. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2001. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2001-0802. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2001. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2001-0810. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2001. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2001-0811. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2001. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2001-0812. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2001. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2001-0813. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2001. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2001-0814. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2001. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2001-1121. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2001-1084. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2001-1084. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2001-1084 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2001-1167. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2001-0976. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2001-0976. Notes: CVE-2001-0976 should be used instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2001-1492. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2001-1460. Reason: This candidate is a refinement duplicate of CVE-2001-1460. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2001-1460 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usa... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2001-1588. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2001-1589. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2001-1590. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2001-1591. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2001-1592. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2002-0035. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2002. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2002-0192. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-0193, CVE-2002-1564. Reason: This candidate was published with a description that identified a different vulnerability than what was identified in the original authoritative reference. Notes: Consult CVE-2002-0193 or CVE-2002-1564 to find the id... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2002-0390. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-0639. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2002-0639. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2002-0639 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2002-0633. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2002. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2002-0634. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2002. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2002-0635. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2002. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2002-0646. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-0371. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2002-0371. Notes: CVE-2002-0371 should be used instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2002-0828. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-0862. Reason: This is a duplicate of CVE-2002-0862. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2002-0862 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2002-0841. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-0842. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2002-0842. The duplicate assignment was made before public disclosure. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2002-1161. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-1380. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2002-1380. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2002-1234. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-0180. Reason: This candidate is a an out-of-band assignment duplicate of CVE-2002-0180. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2002-0180 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to preven... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2002-1259. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-1286. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2002-1286. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2002-1286 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental u... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2002-1261. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-1292. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2002-1292. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2002-1292 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental u... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2002-1263. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-1295. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2002-1295. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2002-1295 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental u... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2002-1297. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2002. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2002-1298. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2002. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2002-1299. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2002. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2002-1300. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2002. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2002-1301. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2002. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2002-1302. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2002. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2002-1303. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2002. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2002-1304. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2002. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2002-1305. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2002. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2002-1370. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-1367. Reason: This CAN was originally assigned for the theft of root certificates in CUPS, but it was later deemed to be a legitimate result of exploiting a different vulnerability, CVE-2002-1367, so it is not a distinct vulnerability. Notes: Al... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2002-1404. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-1348. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2002-1348. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2002-1348 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental u... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2002-1638. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-2153. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2002-2153. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2002-2153 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2002-20001. | The Diffie-Hellman Key Agreement Protocol allows remote attackers (from the client side) to send arbitrary numbers that are actually not public keys, and trigger expensive server-side DHE modular-exponentiation calculations, aka a D(HE)at or D(HE)ater attack. The client needs very little CPU resources and network bandw... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2002-20002. | The Net::EasyTCP package before 0.15 for Perl always uses Perl's builtin rand(), which is not a strong random number generator, for cryptographic keys. | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2002-2135. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-1618. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2002-1618. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2002-1618 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2002-2136. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-1590. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2002-1590. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2002-1590 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2002-2147. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-1828. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2002-1828. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2002-1828 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2002-2151. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-1651. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2002-1651. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2002-1651 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2002-2157. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-1660. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2002-1660. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2002-1660 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2002-2160. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-1798. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2002-1798. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2002-1798 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2002-2194. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-1589. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2002-1589. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2002-1589 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio
README.md exists but content is empty.
- Downloads last month
- 4