Datasets:
language:
- it
license: cc-by-nc-4.0
task_categories:
- text-retrieval
task_ids:
- document-retrieval
pretty_name: IT-RAG-Bench
size_categories:
- 1K<n<10K
tags:
- retrieval
- RAG
- Italian
- embeddings
- benchmark
- synthetic
configs:
- config_name: corpus
data_files:
- split: train
path: data/corpus.jsonl
- config_name: queries
data_files:
- split: train
path: data/queries.jsonl
- config_name: qrels
data_files:
- split: train
path: data/qrels.jsonl
IT-RAG-Bench: Italian Retrieval & RAG Benchmark
IT-RAG-Bench is a synthetic Italian-language retrieval benchmark designed to evaluate dense embedding models on document retrieval and Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) tasks in Italian.
This dataset is the companion resource for the paper:
Benchmarking Google Embeddings 2 against Open-Source Models for Multilingual Dense Retrieval and RAG Systems
Stefano Cirillo, Domenico Desiato, Giuseppe Polese, Giandomenico Solimando — arXiv 2026
📄 https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.23618
💻 https://github.com/cciro94/GoogleEmbeddings2-benchmark
Dataset Summary
IT-RAG-Bench provides 3,200 Italian passages and 640 natural-language queries spanning three document styles representative of real Italian information retrieval scenarios:
- Encyclopedic passages (Wikipedia-style)
- FAQ passages (public-administration question–answer pairs)
- Legal/regulatory article excerpts (Italian legislative style)
The dataset was generated synthetically with a fixed random seed (42) using Italian-language topic vocabularies drawn from AI/NLP, legal, and public-administration domains, ensuring full reproducibility without relying on crawled or licensed data.
Dataset Structure
Configurations
| Config | File | Rows | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
corpus |
data/corpus.jsonl |
3,200 | Passages to retrieve from |
queries |
data/queries.jsonl |
640 | Italian natural-language queries |
qrels |
data/qrels.jsonl |
1,246 | Query–document relevance judgements |
Corpus Composition
| Type | Count | Style description |
|---|---|---|
wiki |
1,200 | Encyclopedic passages about AI, NLP, and Italian regulatory topics |
faq |
800 | Public-administration FAQ: question + structured answer |
legal |
1,200 | Synthetic Italian legal articles (Art. N format) |
Total passages: 3,200 | Total queries: 640 | Total relevance pairs: 1,246
Field Schema
corpus.jsonl
{
"_id": "wiki_it_0",
"text": "Il documento esamina intelligenza artificiale nel contesto di edilizia ...",
"type": "wiki"
}
queries.jsonl
{
"_id": "q_it_0",
"text": "Quali sono i risultati dell'uso di intelligenza artificiale nel settore sanità?"
}
qrels.jsonl
{
"query_id": "q_it_0",
"corpus_id": "wiki_it_42",
"score": 1
}
Relevance scores are binary (0 / 1). Each query has between 1 and 3 relevant documents.
Dataset Creation
Motivation
Existing Italian retrieval benchmarks are scarce and often require special licensing. IT-RAG-Bench was created to provide a freely available, reproducible Italian evaluation set for comparing embedding models across typical Italian enterprise retrieval scenarios (administrative portals, legal databases, public FAQs).
Generation Process
The corpus is generated from parameterised templates filled with Italian-language vocabulary lists:
- Topics: intelligenza artificiale, reti neurali, recupero dell'informazione, elaborazione del linguaggio naturale, contratti digitali, normativa GDPR, diritto del lavoro, appalti pubblici, tutela ambientale, previdenza sociale, proprietà intellettuale, riforma fiscale
- Sectors: pubblica amministrazione, sanità, istruzione, finanza, edilizia, agricoltura, trasporti, commercio elettronico, sicurezza informatica, energia rinnovabile
Queries are generated from six Italian question templates (e.g., "Quali sono i risultati dell'uso di {topic} nel settore {sector}?"). Relevance labels are assigned by randomly associating each query with 1–3 documents of a randomly selected type.
Random seed: 42 (fully deterministic and reproducible)
Caveats
Because relevance labels are randomly assigned rather than annotated by humans, absolute metric scores are lower than on human-annotated benchmarks. The dataset is best used for comparative evaluation (ranking models against each other) rather than measuring absolute retrieval performance.
Benchmark Results
The following results were obtained in the companion paper using FAISS HNSW indexing and nDCG@10 as the primary metric (640 queries):
| Model | Type | Recall@1 | Recall@5 | Recall@10 | MRR | nDCG@10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GE2 (Google Embeddings 2) | API | 0.061 | 0.288 | 0.476 | 0.259 | 0.282 |
| mE5 (multilingual-e5-large) | Open | 0.051 | 0.280 | 0.489 | 0.243 | 0.279 |
| E5-large | Open | 0.053 | 0.279 | 0.439 | 0.247 | 0.262 |
| mpnet | Open | 0.054 | 0.238 | 0.397 | 0.240 | 0.243 |
| BGE-M3 | Open | 0.046 | 0.253 | 0.404 | 0.224 | 0.238 |
| LaBSE | Open | 0.048 | 0.190 | 0.315 | 0.184 | 0.189 |
Experimental Setup
- Index: FAISS HNSW (M=32, efConstruction=200, efSearch=128)
- Embedding cache: SHA-256 keyed disk cache (diskcache), preventing redundant API calls
- Reproducibility: fixed seed 42, deterministic CUDA operations
- Hardware: NVIDIA A100 40GB (open-source models), API calls for commercial models
Usage
from datasets import load_dataset
# Load corpus, queries, and relevance judgements
corpus = load_dataset("Siando/it-rag-bench", "corpus", split="train")
queries = load_dataset("Siando/it-rag-bench", "queries", split="train")
qrels = load_dataset("Siando/it-rag-bench", "qrels", split="train")
# Example: build a corpus dict
corpus_dict = {row["_id"]: row["text"] for row in corpus}
Minimal retrieval evaluation example
from datasets import load_dataset
corpus = {r["_id"]: r["text"] for r in load_dataset("Siando/it-rag-bench", "corpus", split="train")}
queries = {r["_id"]: r["text"] for r in load_dataset("Siando/it-rag-bench", "queries", split="train")}
qrels = {}
for r in load_dataset("Siando/it-rag-bench", "qrels", split="train"):
qrels.setdefault(r["query_id"], {})[r["corpus_id"]] = r["score"]
Repository & Code
The full benchmarking framework (embedding clients, FAISS retrieval, chunking ablations, plotting) is available at:
https://github.com/cciro94/GoogleEmbeddings2-benchmark
Citation
If you use IT-RAG-Bench in your research, please cite:
@misc{cirillo2026benchmarkinggoogleembeddings2,
title = {Benchmarking Google Embeddings 2 against Open-Source Models for Multilingual Dense Retrieval and RAG Systems},
author = {Stefano Cirillo and Domenico Desiato and Giuseppe Polese and Giandomenico Solimando},
year = {2026},
eprint = {2605.23618},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
primaryClass = {cs.CL},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.23618}
}
License
This dataset is released under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) license.
You are free to use and adapt it for non-commercial purposes with proper attribution.
See https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ for details.