README.md

metadata

language:
  - en
license: apache-2.0
tags:
  - sentence-transformers
  - sentence-similarity
  - feature-extraction
  - dense
  - generated_from_trainer
  - dataset_size:82
  - loss:MatryoshkaLoss
  - loss:MultipleNegativesRankingLoss
base_model: intfloat/multilingual-e5-large
widget:
  - source_sentence: When did the victims give away credentials?
    sentences:
      - >-
        According to the provision of Article 386 paragraph 1 of the Greek Penal
        Code,


        "Whoever, with the intent to obtain for themselves or another an
        unlawful pecuniary benefit, causes damage to another’s property by
        persuading someone to act, omit, or tolerate something through the
        knowing misrepresentation of false facts as true, or through the
        unlawful concealment or suppression of true facts, shall be punished by
        imprisonment of at least three months, and if the damage caused is
        particularly large, by imprisonment of at least two years."


        From this provision it follows that, for the crime of fraud to be
        established, the following elements are required:


        a) The intent of the perpetrator to obtain for themselves or another an
        unlawful pecuniary benefit, without it being necessary that the benefit
        actually materialize;


        b) The knowing misrepresentation of false facts as true, or the unlawful
        concealment or suppression of true facts, as a result of which—serving
        as the causal factor—someone is deceived and proceeds to an act,
        omission, or acquiescence that is detrimental to themselves or another;
        and


        c) Damage to another person’s property, as defined under civil law,
        which must be causally linked to the deceptive acts or omissions of the
        perpetrator. It is not required that the person deceived and the person
        who suffered the damage be the same individual.


        The term “facts”, within the meaning of the above provision, refers to
        real circumstances relating to the past or present, and not to those
        that will occur in the future, such as mere promises or contractual
        obligations. However, when such promises or obligations are accompanied
        by false assurances and representations of other false facts referring
        to the present or the past, in such a manner as to create the impression
        of future fulfillment based on a false present situation fabricated by
        the perpetrator, who has already formed the decision not to fulfill
        their obligation, the crime of fraud is established.


        The term “property” refers to the totality of a person’s economic assets
        that possess monetary value, while damage to property means its
        reduction—specifically, the difference between the monetary value the
        property had before the disposition caused by the fraudulent conduct and
        the value remaining after it. Property damage exists even if the victim
        possesses an active claim for restitution.


        The time of commission of the fraud is considered to be the moment when
        the perpetrator acted and completed their fraudulent conduct, namely
        when they made the false representations that deceived the victim or a
        third party. Any subsequent moment at which the victim’s damage actually
        occurred—thereby completing the fraud—or the time when the victim
        carried out the harmful act or omission, is irrelevant.
      - >-
        Voice phishing involves manipulating victims over the phone. Attackers
        pose as bank officials or authorities and use intimidation to extract
        financial details.


        Scenario:

        - Victims are coerced into giving away PINs, passwords, or other
        credentials under false pretenses of legal or financial emergencies.
      - >-
        According to the provision of Article 386 paragraph 1 of the Greek Penal
        Code,


        "Whoever, with the intent to obtain for themselves or another an
        unlawful pecuniary benefit, causes damage to another’s property by
        persuading someone to act, omit, or tolerate something through the
        knowing misrepresentation of false facts as true, or through the
        unlawful concealment or suppression of true facts, shall be punished by
        imprisonment of at least three months, and if the damage caused is
        particularly large, by imprisonment of at least two years."


        From this provision, it follows that, for the crime of fraud to be
        established, the following elements are required:


        a) The intent of the perpetrator to obtain for themselves or another an
        unlawful pecuniary benefit, without requiring that the benefit actually
        materialize;


        b) The knowing misrepresentation of false facts as true, or the unlawful
        concealment or suppression of true facts, as a result of which—serving
        as the causal factor—someone is deceived and performs an act, omission,
        or acquiescence; and


        c) Damage to another’s property, according to civil law, which must be
        causally connected to the perpetrator’s deceptive acts or omissions. It
        is not required that the deceived person and the person who suffered the
        loss be the same.


        The term “facts,” within the meaning of the above provision, refers to
        real circumstances relating to the past or present, and not to those
        that will occur in the future, such as mere promises or contractual
        obligations. However, when such promises or obligations are accompanied
        by false assurances and representations of other false facts relating to
        the present or the past, in such a way as to create the impression of
        future fulfillment, based on a false present situation fabricated by the
        perpetrator—who has already made the decision not to fulfill their
        obligation—then the crime of fraud is established.


        The term “property” denotes the totality of a person’s economic assets
        possessing monetary value, while damage to property refers to its
        reduction—specifically, the difference between the property’s monetary
        value before the disposition caused by the fraudulent conduct and its
        value afterward. Property damage exists even if the victim has an active
        claim for its restitution.


        The time of commission of fraud is considered to be the moment when the
        perpetrator acted and completed the deceptive conduct, that is, when
        they made the false representations which deceived the victim or a third
        party. Any later time at which the victim’s financial loss occurred—thus
        completing the fraud—or the time when the harmful act or omission of the
        deceived person took place, is irrelevant.


        The reference to multiple modes of commission of fraud (i.e., both the
        misrepresentation of false facts and the concealment of true ones) may
        create ambiguity and contradiction, unless it is made clear from the
        overall findings that the offense was committed in one particular
        manner, and that the reference to the other merely serves to define the
        intent (mens rea) of the perpetrator—specifically, that the
        representations were false.


        Furthermore, a conviction must contain the specific and well-reasoned
        justification required by Articles 93 paragraph 3 of the Constitution
        and 139 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The absence of such reasoning
        constitutes grounds for cassation (appeal) under Article 510 paragraph
        1(d) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, when the judgment does not set
        out, with clarity, completeness, and consistency, the factual
        circumstances established by the evidence, upon which the court based
        its findings regarding the objective and subjective elements of the
        offense, the evidence supporting those findings, and the legal reasoning
        through which those facts were subsumed under the applicable substantive
        criminal provision.


        For the existence of such reasoning, the explanatory and operative parts
        of the decision may complement each other, as they form a single,
        unified whole.


        The existence of intent (dolus) does not generally need to be specially
        justified, since it is inherent in the will to bring about the factual
        circumstances constituting the objective elements of the offense, and it
        is presumed from their realization in each particular case—unless the
        law requires additional elements for criminal liability, such as the act
        being committed with knowledge of a specific circumstance (direct
        intent) or with the pursuit of a further purpose, i.e., the achievement
        of an additional result (offenses requiring a special subjective
        element).


        Furthermore, under Article 510 paragraph 1(e) of the Code of Criminal
        Procedure, a misapplication of substantive criminal law also constitutes
        grounds for cassation. Such misapplication occurs when the trial court
        incorrectly applies the law to the facts it has found to be true, or
        when the violation occurs indirectly, namely when the reasoning of the
        judgment—comprising the combination of its factual and operative parts
        and relating to the elements and identity of the offense—contains
        ambiguities, contradictions, or logical gaps, rendering it impossible to
        verify, on appeal, whether the law was applied correctly. In such cases,
        the judgment lacks a lawful basis.
  - source_sentence: What must be the outcome of the deception in relation to property damage?
    sentences:
      - >-
        According to the provision of Article 386 paragraph 1 of the Greek Penal
        Code,


        "Whoever, with the intent to obtain for themselves or another an
        unlawful pecuniary benefit, causes damage to another’s property by
        persuading someone to act, omit, or tolerate something through the
        knowing misrepresentation of false facts as true, or through the
        unlawful concealment or suppression of true facts, shall be punished by
        imprisonment of at least three months, and if the damage caused is
        particularly large, by imprisonment of at least two years."


        From this provision, it follows that, for the crime of fraud to be
        established, the following elements are required:


        a) The intent of the perpetrator to obtain for themselves or another an
        unlawful pecuniary benefit, without requiring that the benefit actually
        materialize;


        b) The knowing misrepresentation of false facts as true, or the unlawful
        concealment or suppression of true facts, as a result of which—serving
        as the causal factor—someone is deceived and performs an act, omission,
        or acquiescence; and


        c) Damage to another’s property, according to civil law, which must be
        causally connected to the perpetrator’s deceptive acts or omissions. It
        is not required that the deceived person and the person who suffered the
        loss be the same.


        The term “facts,” within the meaning of the above provision, refers to
        real circumstances relating to the past or present, and not to those
        that will occur in the future, such as mere promises or contractual
        obligations. However, when such promises or obligations are accompanied
        by false assurances and representations of other false facts relating to
        the present or the past, in such a way as to create the impression of
        future fulfillment, based on a false present situation fabricated by the
        perpetrator—who has already made the decision not to fulfill their
        obligation—then the crime of fraud is established.


        The term “property” denotes the totality of a person’s economic assets
        possessing monetary value, while damage to property refers to its
        reduction—specifically, the difference between the property’s monetary
        value before the disposition caused by the fraudulent conduct and its
        value afterward. Property damage exists even if the victim has an active
        claim for its restitution.


        The time of commission of fraud is considered to be the moment when the
        perpetrator acted and completed the deceptive conduct, that is, when
        they made the false representations which deceived the victim or a third
        party. Any later time at which the victim’s financial loss occurred—thus
        completing the fraud—or the time when the harmful act or omission of the
        deceived person took place, is irrelevant.


        The reference to multiple modes of commission of fraud (i.e., both the
        misrepresentation of false facts and the concealment of true ones) may
        create ambiguity and contradiction, unless it is made clear from the
        overall findings that the offense was committed in one particular
        manner, and that the reference to the other merely serves to define the
        intent (mens rea) of the perpetrator—specifically, that the
        representations were false.


        Furthermore, a conviction must contain the specific and well-reasoned
        justification required by Articles 93 paragraph 3 of the Constitution
        and 139 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The absence of such reasoning
        constitutes grounds for cassation (appeal) under Article 510 paragraph
        1(d) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, when the judgment does not set
        out, with clarity, completeness, and consistency, the factual
        circumstances established by the evidence, upon which the court based
        its findings regarding the objective and subjective elements of the
        offense, the evidence supporting those findings, and the legal reasoning
        through which those facts were subsumed under the applicable substantive
        criminal provision.


        For the existence of such reasoning, the explanatory and operative parts
        of the decision may complement each other, as they form a single,
        unified whole.


        The existence of intent (dolus) does not generally need to be specially
        justified, since it is inherent in the will to bring about the factual
        circumstances constituting the objective elements of the offense, and it
        is presumed from their realization in each particular case—unless the
        law requires additional elements for criminal liability, such as the act
        being committed with knowledge of a specific circumstance (direct
        intent) or with the pursuit of a further purpose, i.e., the achievement
        of an additional result (offenses requiring a special subjective
        element).


        Furthermore, under Article 510 paragraph 1(e) of the Code of Criminal
        Procedure, a misapplication of substantive criminal law also constitutes
        grounds for cassation. Such misapplication occurs when the trial court
        incorrectly applies the law to the facts it has found to be true, or
        when the violation occurs indirectly, namely when the reasoning of the
        judgment—comprising the combination of its factual and operative parts
        and relating to the elements and identity of the offense—contains
        ambiguities, contradictions, or logical gaps, rendering it impossible to
        verify, on appeal, whether the law was applied correctly. In such cases,
        the judgment lacks a lawful basis.
      - >-
        According to Article 386 paragraph 1 of the Greek Penal Code,


        "Whoever, with the intent to obtain for themselves or another an
        unlawful pecuniary benefit, causes damage to another’s property by
        persuading someone to act, omit, or tolerate something through the
        knowing misrepresentation of false facts as true, or through the
        unlawful concealment or suppression of true facts, shall be punished by
        imprisonment of at least three months, and if the damage caused is
        particularly large, by imprisonment of at least two years."


        From these provisions, it follows that, for the crime of fraud to be
        established, the following elements are required:


        a) The intent of the perpetrator to obtain for themselves or another an
        unlawful pecuniary benefit;


        b) The knowing misrepresentation of false facts as true, or the unlawful
        concealment or suppression of true facts, as a result of which—serving
        as the causal factor—someone is deceived and proceeds to an act,
        omission, or acquiescence detrimental to themselves or another; and


        c) Damage to another’s property, as defined under civil law, which must
        be causally connected to the perpetrator’s deceptive acts.


        From the above provisions, it is deduced that the crime of fraud is
        established both objectively and subjectively through the knowing
        misrepresentation of false facts as true, or the unlawful concealment or
        suppression of true ones, by which another person is deceived and, as a
        result, performs an act, omission, or acquiescence involving a
        disposition of property that directly and necessarily causes financial
        damage to the deceived person or another, with the intent that the
        perpetrator or another gain an unlawful benefit. It is irrelevant
        whether this intended benefit was ultimately achieved.


        The term “facts,” within the meaning of the above provision, refers to
        real circumstances relating to the past or present, and not to those
        expected to occur in the future, such as mere promises or contractual
        obligations. The false fact must have existed in the past or must be a
        present circumstance at the time it is asserted, and cannot relate to
        the future.


        However, when future circumstances—that is, promises or contractual
        obligations—are accompanied by false assurances and representations of
        other false facts referring to the present or past, in such a way as to
        create the impression of future fulfillment, based on a false present
        situation or supposed ability of the perpetrator, who had already made
        the decision not to fulfill their obligation, then the crime of fraud is
        established.
      - >-
        According to the provision of Article 386 paragraph 1 of the Greek Penal
        Code,


        "Whoever, with the intent to obtain for themselves or another an
        unlawful pecuniary benefit, causes damage to another person’s property
        by persuading someone to act, omit, or tolerate something through the
        knowing misrepresentation of false facts as true, or through the
        unlawful concealment or suppression of true facts, shall be punished by
        imprisonment of at least three months, and if the damage caused is
        particularly large, by imprisonment of at least two years."


        From this provision, it follows that for the crime of fraud to be
        established, the following elements are required:


        a) Intent of the perpetrator to obtain for themselves or another an
        unlawful pecuniary benefit, regardless of whether this benefit was
        actually realized;


        b) The knowing misrepresentation of false facts as true, or the unlawful
        concealment or suppression of true facts, as a result of which, as a
        causal factor, someone is deceived and acts in a way that is detrimental
        to themselves or another (by an act, omission, or acquiescence); and


        c) Damage to another’s property, in the sense recognized by civil law,
        which must be causally linked to the fraudulent conduct (the deceptive
        act or omission of the perpetrator) and to the resulting deception of
        the person who made the property disposition. It is not required that
        the person deceived be the same person who suffered the damage.


        Property damage exists when there is a reduction or deterioration in the
        victim’s assets, even if the victim has an active claim to restitution.
        However, as an element of the objective aspect of the crime of fraud,
        the damage must be the direct, necessary, and exclusive result of the
        property disposition—namely, the act, omission, or acquiescence
        performed by the person deceived by the perpetrator’s fraudulent
        conduct.


        There must therefore be a causal connection between the perpetrator’s
        deceptive behavior and the deception it caused, as well as between this
        deception and the resulting property damage, which must be the direct,
        necessary, and exclusive outcome of the deception and of the act,
        omission, or acquiescence of the deceived person.


        The term “facts” refers to real circumstances relating to the past or
        present, and not to those expected to occur in the future, such as mere
        promises or contractual obligations. However, when such promises or
        obligations are accompanied by false assurances and representations of
        other false facts relating to the present or the past, in such a way as
        to create the impression of future fulfillment, based on the false
        present situation presented by a perpetrator who has already made the
        decision not to fulfill their obligation, then the crime of fraud is
        established.


        The time of commission of the fraud is considered to be the moment when
        the perpetrator acted and completed their deceptive conduct—that is,
        when they made the false representations that deceived the victim or a
        third party. Any later time at which the victim’s financial loss
        actually occurred—thus completing the fraud—or the time when the
        deceived person performed the harmful act or omission, is irrelevant.
  - source_sentence: How are victims tricked in email phishing scams?
    sentences:
      - >-
        According to Article 386 paragraph 1 of the Greek Penal Code,


        "Whoever, with the intent to obtain for themselves or another an
        unlawful pecuniary benefit, causes damage to another’s property by
        persuading someone to act, omit, or tolerate something through the
        knowing misrepresentation of false facts as true, or through the
        unlawful concealment or suppression of true facts, shall be punished by
        imprisonment of at least three months, and if the damage caused is
        particularly large, by imprisonment of at least two years."


        From these provisions, it follows that, for the crime of fraud to be
        established, the following elements are required:


        a) The intent of the perpetrator to obtain for themselves or another an
        unlawful pecuniary benefit;


        b) The knowing misrepresentation of false facts as true, or the unlawful
        concealment or suppression of true facts, as a result of which—serving
        as the causal factor—someone is deceived and proceeds to an act,
        omission, or acquiescence detrimental to themselves or another; and


        c) Damage to another’s property, as defined under civil law, which must
        be causally connected to the perpetrator’s deceptive acts.


        From the above provisions, it is deduced that the crime of fraud is
        established both objectively and subjectively through the knowing
        misrepresentation of false facts as true, or the unlawful concealment or
        suppression of true ones, by which another person is deceived and, as a
        result, performs an act, omission, or acquiescence involving a
        disposition of property that directly and necessarily causes financial
        damage to the deceived person or another, with the intent that the
        perpetrator or another gain an unlawful benefit. It is irrelevant
        whether this intended benefit was ultimately achieved.


        The term “facts,” within the meaning of the above provision, refers to
        real circumstances relating to the past or present, and not to those
        expected to occur in the future, such as mere promises or contractual
        obligations. The false fact must have existed in the past or must be a
        present circumstance at the time it is asserted, and cannot relate to
        the future.


        However, when future circumstances—that is, promises or contractual
        obligations—are accompanied by false assurances and representations of
        other false facts referring to the present or past, in such a way as to
        create the impression of future fulfillment, based on a false present
        situation or supposed ability of the perpetrator, who had already made
        the decision not to fulfill their obligation, then the crime of fraud is
        established.
      - >-
        According to the provision of Article 386 paragraph 1 of the Greek Penal
        Code,


        "Whoever, with the intent to obtain for themselves or another an
        unlawful pecuniary benefit, causes damage to another’s property by
        persuading someone to act, omit, or tolerate something through the
        knowing misrepresentation of false facts as true, or through the
        unlawful concealment or suppression of true facts, shall be punished by
        imprisonment of at least three months, and if the damage caused is
        particularly large, by imprisonment of at least two years."


        From this provision it follows that, for the crime of fraud to be
        established, the following elements are required:


        a) The intent of the perpetrator to obtain for themselves or another an
        unlawful pecuniary benefit, without it being necessary that the benefit
        actually materialize;


        b) The knowing misrepresentation of false facts as true, or the unlawful
        concealment or suppression of true facts, as a result of which—serving
        as the causal factor—someone is deceived and proceeds to an act,
        omission, or acquiescence that is detrimental to themselves or another;
        and


        c) Damage to another person’s property, as defined under civil law,
        which must be causally linked to the deceptive acts or omissions of the
        perpetrator. It is not required that the person deceived and the person
        who suffered the damage be the same individual.


        The term “facts”, within the meaning of the above provision, refers to
        real circumstances relating to the past or present, and not to those
        that will occur in the future, such as mere promises or contractual
        obligations. However, when such promises or obligations are accompanied
        by false assurances and representations of other false facts referring
        to the present or the past, in such a manner as to create the impression
        of future fulfillment based on a false present situation fabricated by
        the perpetrator, who has already formed the decision not to fulfill
        their obligation, the crime of fraud is established.


        The term “property” refers to the totality of a person’s economic assets
        that possess monetary value, while damage to property means its
        reduction—specifically, the difference between the monetary value the
        property had before the disposition caused by the fraudulent conduct and
        the value remaining after it. Property damage exists even if the victim
        possesses an active claim for restitution.


        The time of commission of the fraud is considered to be the moment when
        the perpetrator acted and completed their fraudulent conduct, namely
        when they made the false representations that deceived the victim or a
        third party. Any subsequent moment at which the victim’s damage actually
        occurred—thereby completing the fraud—or the time when the victim
        carried out the harmful act or omission, is irrelevant.
      - >-
        Email phishing is a type of identity theft scam conducted via email or
        SMS. The attacker uses social engineering tactics such as impersonating
        trusted entities and inducing urgency. Victims are tricked into
        disclosing personal information or downloading malware.


        Scenarios:

        - Scenario 1: Emails impersonating high-ranking executives accuse
        victims of crimes to coerce them into revealing information or opening
        malware-laden attachments.

        - Scenario 2: Emails/SMS from fake banks or authorities alert victims of
        data breaches, directing them to spoofed websites to input credentials.

        - Scenario 3: SMS messages deliver disguised malware apps that harvest
        sensitive data.

        - Scenario 4: SMS links lead to pharming sites that mimic trusted brands
        and steal login data through fake pop-ups.
  - source_sentence: >-
      What circumstances do the term 'facts' refer to within the meaning of the
      provision?
    sentences:
      - >-
        According to the provision of Article 386 paragraph 1 of the Greek Penal
        Code,


        "Whoever, with the intent to obtain for themselves or another an
        unlawful pecuniary benefit, causes damage to another person’s property
        by persuading someone to act, omit, or tolerate something through the
        knowing misrepresentation of false facts as true, or through the
        unlawful concealment or suppression of true facts, shall be punished by
        imprisonment of at least three months, and if the damage caused is
        particularly large, by imprisonment of at least two years."


        From this provision, it follows that for the crime of fraud to be
        established, the following elements are required:


        a) Intent of the perpetrator to obtain for themselves or another an
        unlawful pecuniary benefit, regardless of whether this benefit was
        actually realized;


        b) The knowing misrepresentation of false facts as true, or the unlawful
        concealment or suppression of true facts, as a result of which, as a
        causal factor, someone is deceived and acts in a way that is detrimental
        to themselves or another (by an act, omission, or acquiescence); and


        c) Damage to another’s property, in the sense recognized by civil law,
        which must be causally linked to the fraudulent conduct (the deceptive
        act or omission of the perpetrator) and to the resulting deception of
        the person who made the property disposition. It is not required that
        the person deceived be the same person who suffered the damage.


        Property damage exists when there is a reduction or deterioration in the
        victim’s assets, even if the victim has an active claim to restitution.
        However, as an element of the objective aspect of the crime of fraud,
        the damage must be the direct, necessary, and exclusive result of the
        property disposition—namely, the act, omission, or acquiescence
        performed by the person deceived by the perpetrator’s fraudulent
        conduct.


        There must therefore be a causal connection between the perpetrator’s
        deceptive behavior and the deception it caused, as well as between this
        deception and the resulting property damage, which must be the direct,
        necessary, and exclusive outcome of the deception and of the act,
        omission, or acquiescence of the deceived person.


        The term “facts” refers to real circumstances relating to the past or
        present, and not to those expected to occur in the future, such as mere
        promises or contractual obligations. However, when such promises or
        obligations are accompanied by false assurances and representations of
        other false facts relating to the present or the past, in such a way as
        to create the impression of future fulfillment, based on the false
        present situation presented by a perpetrator who has already made the
        decision not to fulfill their obligation, then the crime of fraud is
        established.


        The time of commission of the fraud is considered to be the moment when
        the perpetrator acted and completed their deceptive conduct—that is,
        when they made the false representations that deceived the victim or a
        third party. Any later time at which the victim’s financial loss
        actually occurred—thus completing the fraud—or the time when the
        deceived person performed the harmful act or omission, is irrelevant.
      - >
        1. Anyone who, by knowingly presenting false facts as true or by
        unlawfully concealing or withholding true facts, damages another
        person's property by persuading someone to act, omission, or tolerance
        with the aim of obtaining, for themselves or another, an unlawful
        financial gain from the damage to that property shall be punished with
        imprisonment, "and if the damage caused is particularly great, with
        imprisonment of at least three (3) months and a fine." .

        If the damage caused exceeds a total of one hundred and twenty thousand
        (120,000) euros, imprisonment of up to ten (10) years and a fine shall
        be imposed.

        2. If the fraud is directed directly against the legal entity of the
        Greek State, legal entities governed by public law, or local government
        organizations, and the damage caused exceeds a total of one hundred and
        twenty thousand (120,000) euros, a prison sentence of at least ten (10)
        years and a fine of up to one thousand (1,000) daily units shall be
        imposed. This offense shall be time-barred after twenty (20) years.
      - >-
        According to the provision of Article 386 paragraph 1 of the Greek Penal
        Code,


        "Whoever, with the intent to obtain for themselves or another an
        unlawful pecuniary benefit, causes damage to another’s property by
        persuading someone to act, omit, or tolerate something through the
        knowing misrepresentation of false facts as true, or through the
        unlawful concealment or suppression of true facts, shall be punished by
        imprisonment of at least three months, and if the damage caused is
        particularly large, by imprisonment of at least two years."


        From this provision it follows that, for the crime of fraud to be
        established, the following elements are required:


        a) The intent of the perpetrator to obtain for themselves or another an
        unlawful pecuniary benefit, without it being necessary that the benefit
        actually materialize;


        b) The knowing misrepresentation of false facts as true, or the unlawful
        concealment or suppression of true facts, as a result of which—serving
        as the causal factor—someone is deceived and proceeds to an act,
        omission, or acquiescence that is detrimental to themselves or another;
        and


        c) Damage to another person’s property, as defined under civil law,
        which must be causally linked to the deceptive acts or omissions of the
        perpetrator. It is not required that the person deceived and the person
        who suffered the damage be the same individual.


        The term “facts”, within the meaning of the above provision, refers to
        real circumstances relating to the past or present, and not to those
        that will occur in the future, such as mere promises or contractual
        obligations. However, when such promises or obligations are accompanied
        by false assurances and representations of other false facts referring
        to the present or the past, in such a manner as to create the impression
        of future fulfillment based on a false present situation fabricated by
        the perpetrator, who has already formed the decision not to fulfill
        their obligation, the crime of fraud is established.


        The term “property” refers to the totality of a person’s economic assets
        that possess monetary value, while damage to property means its
        reduction—specifically, the difference between the monetary value the
        property had before the disposition caused by the fraudulent conduct and
        the value remaining after it. Property damage exists even if the victim
        possesses an active claim for restitution.


        The time of commission of the fraud is considered to be the moment when
        the perpetrator acted and completed their fraudulent conduct, namely
        when they made the false representations that deceived the victim or a
        third party. Any subsequent moment at which the victim’s damage actually
        occurred—thereby completing the fraud—or the time when the victim
        carried out the harmful act or omission, is irrelevant.
  - source_sentence: When is the time of commission of the fraud considered?
    sentences:
      - >-
        Spear phishing targets specific individuals or employees within an
        organization using personalized, deceptive emails. Unlike mass phishing,
        these emails are crafted to seem familiar and urgent.


        Scenarios:

        - CEO Fraud: Attackers impersonate executives to extract financial or
        sensitive data from employees.

        - Whaling: High-ranking executives are targeted using tailored fraud
        emails that press for immediate action without verification.
      - >-
        According to the provision of Article 386 paragraph 1 of the Greek Penal
        Code,


        "Whoever, with the intent to obtain for themselves or another an
        unlawful pecuniary benefit, causes damage to another’s property by
        persuading someone to act, omit, or tolerate something through the
        knowing misrepresentation of false facts as true, or through the
        unlawful concealment or suppression of true facts, shall be punished by
        imprisonment of at least three months, and if the damage caused is
        particularly large, by imprisonment of at least two years."


        From this provision it follows that, for the crime of fraud to be
        established, the following elements are required:


        a) The intent of the perpetrator to obtain for themselves or another an
        unlawful pecuniary benefit, without it being necessary that the benefit
        actually materialize;


        b) The knowing misrepresentation of false facts as true, or the unlawful
        concealment or suppression of true facts, as a result of which—serving
        as the causal factor—someone is deceived and proceeds to an act,
        omission, or acquiescence that is detrimental to themselves or another;
        and


        c) Damage to another person’s property, as defined under civil law,
        which must be causally linked to the deceptive acts or omissions of the
        perpetrator. It is not required that the person deceived and the person
        who suffered the damage be the same individual.


        The term “facts”, within the meaning of the above provision, refers to
        real circumstances relating to the past or present, and not to those
        that will occur in the future, such as mere promises or contractual
        obligations. However, when such promises or obligations are accompanied
        by false assurances and representations of other false facts referring
        to the present or the past, in such a manner as to create the impression
        of future fulfillment based on a false present situation fabricated by
        the perpetrator, who has already formed the decision not to fulfill
        their obligation, the crime of fraud is established.


        The term “property” refers to the totality of a person’s economic assets
        that possess monetary value, while damage to property means its
        reduction—specifically, the difference between the monetary value the
        property had before the disposition caused by the fraudulent conduct and
        the value remaining after it. Property damage exists even if the victim
        possesses an active claim for restitution.


        The time of commission of the fraud is considered to be the moment when
        the perpetrator acted and completed their fraudulent conduct, namely
        when they made the false representations that deceived the victim or a
        third party. Any subsequent moment at which the victim’s damage actually
        occurred—thereby completing the fraud—or the time when the victim
        carried out the harmful act or omission, is irrelevant.
      - >-
        According to Article 386 paragraph 1 of the Greek Penal Code,


        "Whoever, with the intent to obtain for themselves or another an
        unlawful pecuniary benefit, causes damage to another’s property by
        persuading someone to act, omit, or tolerate something through the
        knowing misrepresentation of false facts as true, or through the
        unlawful concealment or suppression of true facts, shall be punished by
        imprisonment of at least three months, and if the damage caused is
        particularly large, by imprisonment of at least two years."


        From these provisions, it follows that, for the crime of fraud to be
        established, the following elements are required:


        a) The intent of the perpetrator to obtain for themselves or another an
        unlawful pecuniary benefit;


        b) The knowing misrepresentation of false facts as true, or the unlawful
        concealment or suppression of true facts, as a result of which—serving
        as the causal factor—someone is deceived and proceeds to an act,
        omission, or acquiescence detrimental to themselves or another; and


        c) Damage to another’s property, as defined under civil law, which must
        be causally connected to the perpetrator’s deceptive acts.


        From the above provisions, it is deduced that the crime of fraud is
        established both objectively and subjectively through the knowing
        misrepresentation of false facts as true, or the unlawful concealment or
        suppression of true ones, by which another person is deceived and, as a
        result, performs an act, omission, or acquiescence involving a
        disposition of property that directly and necessarily causes financial
        damage to the deceived person or another, with the intent that the
        perpetrator or another gain an unlawful benefit. It is irrelevant
        whether this intended benefit was ultimately achieved.


        The term “facts,” within the meaning of the above provision, refers to
        real circumstances relating to the past or present, and not to those
        expected to occur in the future, such as mere promises or contractual
        obligations. The false fact must have existed in the past or must be a
        present circumstance at the time it is asserted, and cannot relate to
        the future.


        However, when future circumstances—that is, promises or contractual
        obligations—are accompanied by false assurances and representations of
        other false facts referring to the present or past, in such a way as to
        create the impression of future fulfillment, based on a false present
        situation or supposed ability of the perpetrator, who had already made
        the decision not to fulfill their obligation, then the crime of fraud is
        established.
pipeline_tag: sentence-similarity
library_name: sentence-transformers
metrics:
  - cosine_accuracy@1
  - cosine_accuracy@3
  - cosine_accuracy@5
  - cosine_accuracy@10
  - cosine_precision@1
  - cosine_precision@3
  - cosine_precision@5
  - cosine_precision@10
  - cosine_recall@1
  - cosine_recall@3
  - cosine_recall@5
  - cosine_recall@10
  - cosine_ndcg@10
  - cosine_mrr@10
  - cosine_map@100
model-index:
  - name: multilingual_e5_large Finetuned on Data
    results:
      - task:
          type: information-retrieval
          name: Information Retrieval
        dataset:
          name: dim 1024
          type: dim_1024
        metrics:
          - type: cosine_accuracy@1
            value: 0.5238095238095238
            name: Cosine Accuracy@1
          - type: cosine_accuracy@3
            value: 0.5238095238095238
            name: Cosine Accuracy@3
          - type: cosine_accuracy@5
            value: 0.5238095238095238
            name: Cosine Accuracy@5
          - type: cosine_accuracy@10
            value: 0.6190476190476191
            name: Cosine Accuracy@10
          - type: cosine_precision@1
            value: 0.5238095238095238
            name: Cosine Precision@1
          - type: cosine_precision@3
            value: 0.5079365079365079
            name: Cosine Precision@3
          - type: cosine_precision@5
            value: 0.4666666666666666
            name: Cosine Precision@5
          - type: cosine_precision@10
            value: 0.4428571428571429
            name: Cosine Precision@10
          - type: cosine_recall@1
            value: 0.08218864468864469
            name: Cosine Recall@1
          - type: cosine_recall@3
            value: 0.22275641025641024
            name: Cosine Recall@3
          - type: cosine_recall@5
            value: 0.2958638583638584
            name: Cosine Recall@5
          - type: cosine_recall@10
            value: 0.4766483516483517
            name: Cosine Recall@10
          - type: cosine_ndcg@10
            value: 0.5598242514045669
            name: Cosine Ndcg@10
          - type: cosine_mrr@10
            value: 0.5374149659863945
            name: Cosine Mrr@10
          - type: cosine_map@100
            value: 0.6534286699882501
            name: Cosine Map@100
      - task:
          type: information-retrieval
          name: Information Retrieval
        dataset:
          name: dim 768
          type: dim_768
        metrics:
          - type: cosine_accuracy@1
            value: 0.5238095238095238
            name: Cosine Accuracy@1
          - type: cosine_accuracy@3
            value: 0.5238095238095238
            name: Cosine Accuracy@3
          - type: cosine_accuracy@5
            value: 0.5238095238095238
            name: Cosine Accuracy@5
          - type: cosine_accuracy@10
            value: 0.6190476190476191
            name: Cosine Accuracy@10
          - type: cosine_precision@1
            value: 0.5238095238095238
            name: Cosine Precision@1
          - type: cosine_precision@3
            value: 0.5079365079365079
            name: Cosine Precision@3
          - type: cosine_precision@5
            value: 0.4666666666666666
            name: Cosine Precision@5
          - type: cosine_precision@10
            value: 0.4428571428571429
            name: Cosine Precision@10
          - type: cosine_recall@1
            value: 0.08218864468864469
            name: Cosine Recall@1
          - type: cosine_recall@3
            value: 0.22275641025641024
            name: Cosine Recall@3
          - type: cosine_recall@5
            value: 0.2958638583638584
            name: Cosine Recall@5
          - type: cosine_recall@10
            value: 0.4766483516483517
            name: Cosine Recall@10
          - type: cosine_ndcg@10
            value: 0.5598242514045669
            name: Cosine Ndcg@10
          - type: cosine_mrr@10
            value: 0.5374149659863945
            name: Cosine Mrr@10
          - type: cosine_map@100
            value: 0.653075337994289
            name: Cosine Map@100
      - task:
          type: information-retrieval
          name: Information Retrieval
        dataset:
          name: dim 512
          type: dim_512
        metrics:
          - type: cosine_accuracy@1
            value: 0.5238095238095238
            name: Cosine Accuracy@1
          - type: cosine_accuracy@3
            value: 0.5238095238095238
            name: Cosine Accuracy@3
          - type: cosine_accuracy@5
            value: 0.5238095238095238
            name: Cosine Accuracy@5
          - type: cosine_accuracy@10
            value: 0.6190476190476191
            name: Cosine Accuracy@10
          - type: cosine_precision@1
            value: 0.5238095238095238
            name: Cosine Precision@1
          - type: cosine_precision@3
            value: 0.5079365079365079
            name: Cosine Precision@3
          - type: cosine_precision@5
            value: 0.4666666666666666
            name: Cosine Precision@5
          - type: cosine_precision@10
            value: 0.4428571428571429
            name: Cosine Precision@10
          - type: cosine_recall@1
            value: 0.08218864468864469
            name: Cosine Recall@1
          - type: cosine_recall@3
            value: 0.22275641025641024
            name: Cosine Recall@3
          - type: cosine_recall@5
            value: 0.2958638583638584
            name: Cosine Recall@5
          - type: cosine_recall@10
            value: 0.4766483516483517
            name: Cosine Recall@10
          - type: cosine_ndcg@10
            value: 0.5598242514045669
            name: Cosine Ndcg@10
          - type: cosine_mrr@10
            value: 0.5374149659863945
            name: Cosine Mrr@10
          - type: cosine_map@100
            value: 0.6492208787775379
            name: Cosine Map@100
      - task:
          type: information-retrieval
          name: Information Retrieval
        dataset:
          name: dim 256
          type: dim_256
        metrics:
          - type: cosine_accuracy@1
            value: 0.6190476190476191
            name: Cosine Accuracy@1
          - type: cosine_accuracy@3
            value: 0.6190476190476191
            name: Cosine Accuracy@3
          - type: cosine_accuracy@5
            value: 0.6190476190476191
            name: Cosine Accuracy@5
          - type: cosine_accuracy@10
            value: 0.6666666666666666
            name: Cosine Accuracy@10
          - type: cosine_precision@1
            value: 0.6190476190476191
            name: Cosine Precision@1
          - type: cosine_precision@3
            value: 0.6031746031746031
            name: Cosine Precision@3
          - type: cosine_precision@5
            value: 0.5619047619047619
            name: Cosine Precision@5
          - type: cosine_precision@10
            value: 0.5190476190476192
            name: Cosine Precision@10
          - type: cosine_recall@1
            value: 0.08600427350427349
            name: Cosine Recall@1
          - type: cosine_recall@3
            value: 0.2342032967032967
            name: Cosine Recall@3
          - type: cosine_recall@5
            value: 0.31494200244200243
            name: Cosine Recall@5
          - type: cosine_recall@10
            value: 0.5028998778998779
            name: Cosine Recall@10
          - type: cosine_ndcg@10
            value: 0.6420780535145918
            name: Cosine Ndcg@10
          - type: cosine_mrr@10
            value: 0.6258503401360545
            name: Cosine Mrr@10
          - type: cosine_map@100
            value: 0.6975707466438095
            name: Cosine Map@100
      - task:
          type: information-retrieval
          name: Information Retrieval
        dataset:
          name: dim 128
          type: dim_128
        metrics:
          - type: cosine_accuracy@1
            value: 0.5238095238095238
            name: Cosine Accuracy@1
          - type: cosine_accuracy@3
            value: 0.5238095238095238
            name: Cosine Accuracy@3
          - type: cosine_accuracy@5
            value: 0.5238095238095238
            name: Cosine Accuracy@5
          - type: cosine_accuracy@10
            value: 0.6190476190476191
            name: Cosine Accuracy@10
          - type: cosine_precision@1
            value: 0.5238095238095238
            name: Cosine Precision@1
          - type: cosine_precision@3
            value: 0.5079365079365079
            name: Cosine Precision@3
          - type: cosine_precision@5
            value: 0.4666666666666666
            name: Cosine Precision@5
          - type: cosine_precision@10
            value: 0.4428571428571429
            name: Cosine Precision@10
          - type: cosine_recall@1
            value: 0.0811965811965812
            name: Cosine Recall@1
          - type: cosine_recall@3
            value: 0.21978021978021975
            name: Cosine Recall@3
          - type: cosine_recall@5
            value: 0.2909035409035409
            name: Cosine Recall@5
          - type: cosine_recall@10
            value: 0.46672771672771673
            name: Cosine Recall@10
          - type: cosine_ndcg@10
            value: 0.5598242514045669
            name: Cosine Ndcg@10
          - type: cosine_mrr@10
            value: 0.5374149659863945
            name: Cosine Mrr@10
          - type: cosine_map@100
            value: 0.6478872365910466
            name: Cosine Map@100
      - task:
          type: information-retrieval
          name: Information Retrieval
        dataset:
          name: dim 64
          type: dim_64
        metrics:
          - type: cosine_accuracy@1
            value: 0.42857142857142855
            name: Cosine Accuracy@1
          - type: cosine_accuracy@3
            value: 0.47619047619047616
            name: Cosine Accuracy@3
          - type: cosine_accuracy@5
            value: 0.47619047619047616
            name: Cosine Accuracy@5
          - type: cosine_accuracy@10
            value: 0.5714285714285714
            name: Cosine Accuracy@10
          - type: cosine_precision@1
            value: 0.42857142857142855
            name: Cosine Precision@1
          - type: cosine_precision@3
            value: 0.4444444444444445
            name: Cosine Precision@3
          - type: cosine_precision@5
            value: 0.419047619047619
            name: Cosine Precision@5
          - type: cosine_precision@10
            value: 0.3952380952380953
            name: Cosine Precision@10
          - type: cosine_recall@1
            value: 0.054410866910866905
            name: Cosine Recall@1
          - type: cosine_recall@3
            value: 0.18704212454212454
            name: Cosine Recall@3
          - type: cosine_recall@5
            value: 0.27602258852258854
            name: Cosine Recall@5
          - type: cosine_recall@10
            value: 0.43696581196581197
            name: Cosine Recall@10
          - type: cosine_ndcg@10
            value: 0.4917595713548203
            name: Cosine Ndcg@10
          - type: cosine_mrr@10
            value: 0.45804988662131524
            name: Cosine Mrr@10
          - type: cosine_map@100
            value: 0.5872011588310861
            name: Cosine Map@100

multilingual_e5_large Finetuned on Data

This is a sentence-transformers model finetuned from intfloat/multilingual-e5-large. It maps sentences & paragraphs to a 1024-dimensional dense vector space and can be used for semantic textual similarity, semantic search, paraphrase mining, text classification, clustering, and more.

Model Details

Model Description

• Model Type: Sentence Transformer
• Base model: intfloat/multilingual-e5-large
• Maximum Sequence Length: 512 tokens
• Output Dimensionality: 1024 dimensions
• Similarity Function: Cosine Similarity
• Language: en
• License: apache-2.0

Model Sources

• Documentation: Sentence Transformers Documentation
• Repository: Sentence Transformers on GitHub
• Hugging Face: Sentence Transformers on Hugging Face

Full Model Architecture

SentenceTransformer(
  (0): Transformer({'max_seq_length': 512, 'do_lower_case': False, 'architecture': 'XLMRobertaModel'})
  (1): Pooling({'word_embedding_dimension': 1024, 'pooling_mode_cls_token': False, 'pooling_mode_mean_tokens': True, 'pooling_mode_max_tokens': False, 'pooling_mode_mean_sqrt_len_tokens': False, 'pooling_mode_weightedmean_tokens': False, 'pooling_mode_lasttoken': False, 'include_prompt': True})
  (2): Normalize()
)

Usage

Direct Usage (Sentence Transformers)

First install the Sentence Transformers library:

pip install -U sentence-transformers

Then you can load this model and run inference.

from sentence_transformers import SentenceTransformer

# Download from the 🤗 Hub
model = SentenceTransformer("sentence_transformers_model_id")
# Run inference
sentences = [
    'When is the time of commission of the fraud considered?',
    'According to the provision of Article 386 paragraph 1 of the Greek Penal Code,\n\n"Whoever, with the intent to obtain for themselves or another an unlawful pecuniary benefit, causes damage to another’s property by persuading someone to act, omit, or tolerate something through the knowing misrepresentation of false facts as true, or through the unlawful concealment or suppression of true facts, shall be punished by imprisonment of at least three months, and if the damage caused is particularly large, by imprisonment of at least two years."\n\nFrom this provision it follows that, for the crime of fraud to be established, the following elements are required:\n\na) The intent of the perpetrator to obtain for themselves or another an unlawful pecuniary benefit, without it being necessary that the benefit actually materialize;\n\nb) The knowing misrepresentation of false facts as true, or the unlawful concealment or suppression of true facts, as a result of which—serving as the causal factor—someone is deceived and proceeds to an act, omission, or acquiescence that is detrimental to themselves or another; and\n\nc) Damage to another person’s property, as defined under civil law, which must be causally linked to the deceptive acts or omissions of the perpetrator. It is not required that the person deceived and the person who suffered the damage be the same individual.\n\nThe term “facts”, within the meaning of the above provision, refers to real circumstances relating to the past or present, and not to those that will occur in the future, such as mere promises or contractual obligations. However, when such promises or obligations are accompanied by false assurances and representations of other false facts referring to the present or the past, in such a manner as to create the impression of future fulfillment based on a false present situation fabricated by the perpetrator, who has already formed the decision not to fulfill their obligation, the crime of fraud is established.\n\nThe term “property” refers to the totality of a person’s economic assets that possess monetary value, while damage to property means its reduction—specifically, the difference between the monetary value the property had before the disposition caused by the fraudulent conduct and the value remaining after it. Property damage exists even if the victim possesses an active claim for restitution.\n\nThe time of commission of the fraud is considered to be the moment when the perpetrator acted and completed their fraudulent conduct, namely when they made the false representations that deceived the victim or a third party. Any subsequent moment at which the victim’s damage actually occurred—thereby completing the fraud—or the time when the victim carried out the harmful act or omission, is irrelevant.',
    'Spear phishing targets specific individuals or employees within an organization using personalized, deceptive emails. Unlike mass phishing, these emails are crafted to seem familiar and urgent.\n\nScenarios:\n- CEO Fraud: Attackers impersonate executives to extract financial or sensitive data from employees.\n- Whaling: High-ranking executives are targeted using tailored fraud emails that press for immediate action without verification.',
]
embeddings = model.encode(sentences)
print(embeddings.shape)
# [3, 1024]

# Get the similarity scores for the embeddings
similarities = model.similarity(embeddings, embeddings)
print(similarities)
# tensor([[1.0000, 0.6673, 0.4780],
#         [0.6673, 1.0000, 0.4691],
#         [0.4780, 0.4691, 1.0000]])

Evaluation

Metrics

Information Retrieval

• Dataset: dim_1024
• Evaluated with InformationRetrievalEvaluator with these parameters:

  {
      "truncate_dim": 1024
  }
  

Metric	Value
cosine_accuracy@1	0.5238
cosine_accuracy@3	0.5238
cosine_accuracy@5	0.5238
cosine_accuracy@10	0.619
cosine_precision@1	0.5238
cosine_precision@3	0.5079
cosine_precision@5	0.4667
cosine_precision@10	0.4429
cosine_recall@1	0.0822
cosine_recall@3	0.2228
cosine_recall@5	0.2959
cosine_recall@10	0.4766
cosine_ndcg@10	0.5598
cosine_mrr@10	0.5374
cosine_map@100	0.6534

Information Retrieval

• Dataset: dim_768
• Evaluated with InformationRetrievalEvaluator with these parameters:

  {
      "truncate_dim": 768
  }
  

Metric	Value
cosine_accuracy@1	0.5238
cosine_accuracy@3	0.5238
cosine_accuracy@5	0.5238
cosine_accuracy@10	0.619
cosine_precision@1	0.5238
cosine_precision@3	0.5079
cosine_precision@5	0.4667
cosine_precision@10	0.4429
cosine_recall@1	0.0822
cosine_recall@3	0.2228
cosine_recall@5	0.2959
cosine_recall@10	0.4766
cosine_ndcg@10	0.5598
cosine_mrr@10	0.5374
cosine_map@100	0.6531

Information Retrieval

• Dataset: dim_512
• Evaluated with InformationRetrievalEvaluator with these parameters:

  {
      "truncate_dim": 512
  }
  

Metric	Value
cosine_accuracy@1	0.5238
cosine_accuracy@3	0.5238
cosine_accuracy@5	0.5238
cosine_accuracy@10	0.619
cosine_precision@1	0.5238
cosine_precision@3	0.5079
cosine_precision@5	0.4667
cosine_precision@10	0.4429
cosine_recall@1	0.0822
cosine_recall@3	0.2228
cosine_recall@5	0.2959
cosine_recall@10	0.4766
cosine_ndcg@10	0.5598
cosine_mrr@10	0.5374
cosine_map@100	0.6492

Information Retrieval

• Dataset: dim_256
• Evaluated with InformationRetrievalEvaluator with these parameters:

  {
      "truncate_dim": 256
  }
  

Metric	Value
cosine_accuracy@1	0.619
cosine_accuracy@3	0.619
cosine_accuracy@5	0.619
cosine_accuracy@10	0.6667
cosine_precision@1	0.619
cosine_precision@3	0.6032
cosine_precision@5	0.5619
cosine_precision@10	0.519
cosine_recall@1	0.086
cosine_recall@3	0.2342
cosine_recall@5	0.3149
cosine_recall@10	0.5029
cosine_ndcg@10	0.6421
cosine_mrr@10	0.6259
cosine_map@100	0.6976

Information Retrieval

• Dataset: dim_128
• Evaluated with InformationRetrievalEvaluator with these parameters:

  {
      "truncate_dim": 128
  }
  

Metric	Value
cosine_accuracy@1	0.5238
cosine_accuracy@3	0.5238
cosine_accuracy@5	0.5238
cosine_accuracy@10	0.619
cosine_precision@1	0.5238
cosine_precision@3	0.5079
cosine_precision@5	0.4667
cosine_precision@10	0.4429
cosine_recall@1	0.0812
cosine_recall@3	0.2198
cosine_recall@5	0.2909
cosine_recall@10	0.4667
cosine_ndcg@10	0.5598
cosine_mrr@10	0.5374
cosine_map@100	0.6479

Information Retrieval

• Dataset: dim_64
• Evaluated with InformationRetrievalEvaluator with these parameters:

  {
      "truncate_dim": 64
  }
  

Metric	Value
cosine_accuracy@1	0.4286
cosine_accuracy@3	0.4762
cosine_accuracy@5	0.4762
cosine_accuracy@10	0.5714
cosine_precision@1	0.4286
cosine_precision@3	0.4444
cosine_precision@5	0.419
cosine_precision@10	0.3952
cosine_recall@1	0.0544
cosine_recall@3	0.187
cosine_recall@5	0.276
cosine_recall@10	0.437
cosine_ndcg@10	0.4918
cosine_mrr@10	0.458
cosine_map@100	0.5872

Training Details

Training Dataset

Unnamed Dataset

• Size: 82 training samples
• Columns: anchor and positive
• Approximate statistics based on the first 82 samples:

  	anchor	positive
  type	string	string
  details	min: 9 tokens mean: 18.17 tokens max: 34 tokens	min: 69 tokens mean: 399.51 tokens max: 512 tokens

• Samples:

  anchor	positive
  What determines whether the act in question shall be punished if the offender is in the service of the legal holder of the data?	Everyone who obtains access to data recorded in a computer or in the external memory of a computer or transmitted by telecommunication systems shall be punished with imprisonment for up to six months or by a fine from 29 to 15,000 Euro, under the condition that these acts have been committed without right, especially in violation of prohibitions or of security measures taken by the legal holder. If the act concerns the international relations or the security of the State, he shall be punished according to Article 148. If the offender is in the service of the legal holder of the data, the act of the preceding paragraph shall be punished only if it has been explicitly prohibited by internal regulations or by a written decision of the holder or of a competent employee of his.
  What must be causally connected to the perpetrator's deceptive acts?	According to Article 386 paragraph 1 of the Greek Penal Code, "Whoever, with the intent to obtain for themselves or another an unlawful pecuniary benefit, causes damage to another’s property by persuading someone to act, omit, or tolerate something through the knowing misrepresentation of false facts as true, or through the unlawful concealment or suppression of true facts, shall be punished by imprisonment of at least three months, and if the damage caused is particularly large, by imprisonment of at least two years." From these provisions, it follows that, for the crime of fraud to be established, the following elements are required: a) The intent of the perpetrator to obtain for themselves or another an unlawful pecuniary benefit; b) The knowing misrepresentation of false facts as true, or the unlawful concealment or suppression of true facts, as a result of which—serving as the causal factor—someone is deceived and proceeds to an act, omission, or acquiescence detrimental to th...
  Who can be punished with imprisonment?	1. Anyone who, by knowingly presenting false facts as true or by unlawfully concealing or withholding true facts, damages another person's property by persuading someone to act, omission, or tolerance with the aim of obtaining, for themselves or another, an unlawful financial gain from the damage to that property shall be punished with imprisonment, "and if the damage caused is particularly great, with imprisonment of at least three (3) months and a fine." . If the damage caused exceeds a total of one hundred and twenty thousand (120,000) euros, imprisonment of up to ten (10) years and a fine shall be imposed. 2. If the fraud is directed directly against the legal entity of the Greek State, legal entities governed by public law, or local government organizations, and the damage caused exceeds a total of one hundred and twenty thousand (120,000) euros, a prison sentence of at least ten (10) years and a fine of up to one thousand (1,000) daily units shall be imposed. This offense shall b...

• Loss: MatryoshkaLoss with these parameters:

  {
      "loss": "MultipleNegativesRankingLoss",
      "matryoshka_dims": [
          1024,
          768,
          512,
          256,
          128,
          64
      ],
      "matryoshka_weights": [
          1,
          1,
          1,
          1,
          1,
          1
      ],
      "n_dims_per_step": -1
  }
  

Training Hyperparameters

Non-Default Hyperparameters

• eval_strategy: epoch
• gradient_accumulation_steps: 2
• learning_rate: 2e-05
• num_train_epochs: 10
• lr_scheduler_type: cosine
• warmup_ratio: 0.1
• bf16: True
• tf32: True
• load_best_model_at_end: True
• optim: adamw_torch_fused
• batch_sampler: no_duplicates

All Hyperparameters

Click to expand

• overwrite_output_dir: False
• do_predict: False
• eval_strategy: epoch
• prediction_loss_only: True
• per_device_train_batch_size: 8
• per_device_eval_batch_size: 8
• per_gpu_train_batch_size: None
• per_gpu_eval_batch_size: None
• gradient_accumulation_steps: 2
• eval_accumulation_steps: None
• torch_empty_cache_steps: None
• learning_rate: 2e-05
• weight_decay: 0.0
• adam_beta1: 0.9
• adam_beta2: 0.999
• adam_epsilon: 1e-08
• max_grad_norm: 1.0
• num_train_epochs: 10
• max_steps: -1
• lr_scheduler_type: cosine
• lr_scheduler_kwargs: {}
• warmup_ratio: 0.1
• warmup_steps: 0
• log_level: passive
• log_level_replica: warning
• log_on_each_node: True
• logging_nan_inf_filter: True
• save_safetensors: True
• save_on_each_node: False
• save_only_model: False
• restore_callback_states_from_checkpoint: False
• no_cuda: False
• use_cpu: False
• use_mps_device: False
• seed: 42
• data_seed: None
• jit_mode_eval: False
• use_ipex: False
• bf16: True
• fp16: False
• fp16_opt_level: O1
• half_precision_backend: auto
• bf16_full_eval: False
• fp16_full_eval: False
• tf32: True
• local_rank: 0
• ddp_backend: None
• tpu_num_cores: None
• tpu_metrics_debug: False
• debug: []
• dataloader_drop_last: False
• dataloader_num_workers: 0
• dataloader_prefetch_factor: None
• past_index: -1
• disable_tqdm: False
• remove_unused_columns: True
• label_names: None
• load_best_model_at_end: True
• ignore_data_skip: False
• fsdp: []
• fsdp_min_num_params: 0
• fsdp_config: {'min_num_params': 0, 'xla': False, 'xla_fsdp_v2': False, 'xla_fsdp_grad_ckpt': False}
• tp_size: 0
• fsdp_transformer_layer_cls_to_wrap: None
• accelerator_config: {'split_batches': False, 'dispatch_batches': None, 'even_batches': True, 'use_seedable_sampler': True, 'non_blocking': False, 'gradient_accumulation_kwargs': None}
• deepspeed: None
• label_smoothing_factor: 0.0
• optim: adamw_torch_fused
• optim_args: None
• adafactor: False
• group_by_length: False
• length_column_name: length
• ddp_find_unused_parameters: None
• ddp_bucket_cap_mb: None
• ddp_broadcast_buffers: False
• dataloader_pin_memory: True
• dataloader_persistent_workers: False
• skip_memory_metrics: True
• use_legacy_prediction_loop: False
• push_to_hub: False
• resume_from_checkpoint: None
• hub_model_id: None
• hub_strategy: every_save
• hub_private_repo: None
• hub_always_push: False
• gradient_checkpointing: False
• gradient_checkpointing_kwargs: None
• include_inputs_for_metrics: False
• include_for_metrics: []
• eval_do_concat_batches: True
• fp16_backend: auto
• push_to_hub_model_id: None
• push_to_hub_organization: None
• mp_parameters:
• auto_find_batch_size: False
• full_determinism: False
• torchdynamo: None
• ray_scope: last
• ddp_timeout: 1800
• torch_compile: False
• torch_compile_backend: None
• torch_compile_mode: None
• include_tokens_per_second: False
• include_num_input_tokens_seen: False
• neftune_noise_alpha: None
• optim_target_modules: None
• batch_eval_metrics: False
• eval_on_start: False
• use_liger_kernel: False
• eval_use_gather_object: False
• average_tokens_across_devices: False
• prompts: None
• batch_sampler: no_duplicates
• multi_dataset_batch_sampler: proportional
• router_mapping: {}
• learning_rate_mapping: {}

Training Logs

Epoch	Step	Training Loss	dim_1024_cosine_ndcg@10	dim_768_cosine_ndcg@10	dim_512_cosine_ndcg@10	dim_256_cosine_ndcg@10	dim_128_cosine_ndcg@10	dim_64_cosine_ndcg@10
0.1818	1	18.029	-	-	-	-	-	-
0.3636	2	19.4106	-	-	-	-	-	-
0.5455	3	16.6201	-	-	-	-	-	-
0.7273	4	15.3048	-	-	-	-	-	-
0.9091	5	14.0182	-	-	-	-	-	-
1.0	6	6.4771	-	-	-	-	-	-
1.0909	7	6.7664	0.6167	0.5821	0.5524	0.5177	0.5278	0.4124
1.1818	8	11.8583	-	-	-	-	-	-
1.3636	9	11.9216	-	-	-	-	-	-
1.5455	10	13.3764	-	-	-	-	-	-
1.7273	11	12.9063	-	-	-	-	-	-
1.9091	12	13.5984	-	-	-	-	-	-
2.0	13	7.8523	-	-	-	-	-	-
2.0909	14	4.4487	0.5921	0.5921	0.5518	0.5709	0.5685	0.5113
2.1818	15	8.5374	-	-	-	-	-	-
2.3636	16	9.6999	-	-	-	-	-	-
2.5455	17	9.0121	-	-	-	-	-	-
2.7273	18	13.5705	-	-	-	-	-	-
2.9091	19	13.0195	-	-	-	-	-	-
3.0	20	7.9821	-	-	-	-	-	-
3.0909	21	3.2842	0.5159	0.5636	0.5468	0.5468	0.5468	0.5233
3.1818	22	4.4446	-	-	-	-	-	-
3.3636	23	5.7244	-	-	-	-	-	-
3.5455	24	7.1394	-	-	-	-	-	-
3.7273	25	16.7583	-	-	-	-	-	-
3.9091	26	11.3515	-	-	-	-	-	-
4.0	27	8.813	-	-	-	-	-	-
4.0909	28	6.9124	0.5159	0.5468	0.4992	0.5468	0.4992	0.4992
4.1818	29	6.1814	-	-	-	-	-	-
4.3636	30	7.1606	-	-	-	-	-	-
4.5455	31	5.0888	-	-	-	-	-	-
4.7273	32	5.0684	-	-	-	-	-	-
4.9091	33	6.7382	-	-	-	-	-	-
5.0	34	7.0497	-	-	-	-	-	-
5.0909	35	6.582	0.5598	0.5598	0.5598	0.6421	0.5598	0.4918

• The bold row denotes the saved checkpoint.

Framework Versions

• Python: 3.12.12
• Sentence Transformers: 5.1.1
• Transformers: 4.51.3
• PyTorch: 2.8.0+cu126
• Accelerate: 1.11.0
• Datasets: 4.0.0
• Tokenizers: 0.21.4

Citation

BibTeX

Sentence Transformers

@inproceedings{reimers-2019-sentence-bert,
    title = "Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networks",
    author = "Reimers, Nils and Gurevych, Iryna",
    booktitle = "Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing",
    month = "11",
    year = "2019",
    publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
    url = "https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.10084",
}

MatryoshkaLoss

@misc{kusupati2024matryoshka,
    title={Matryoshka Representation Learning},
    author={Aditya Kusupati and Gantavya Bhatt and Aniket Rege and Matthew Wallingford and Aditya Sinha and Vivek Ramanujan and William Howard-Snyder and Kaifeng Chen and Sham Kakade and Prateek Jain and Ali Farhadi},
    year={2024},
    eprint={2205.13147},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    primaryClass={cs.LG}
}

MultipleNegativesRankingLoss

@misc{henderson2017efficient,
    title={Efficient Natural Language Response Suggestion for Smart Reply},
    author={Matthew Henderson and Rami Al-Rfou and Brian Strope and Yun-hsuan Sung and Laszlo Lukacs and Ruiqi Guo and Sanjiv Kumar and Balint Miklos and Ray Kurzweil},
    year={2017},
    eprint={1705.00652},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    primaryClass={cs.CL}
}