Spaces:
Running on Zero
A newer version of the Gradio SDK is available: 6.14.0
SKILLS.md — how to work in this repo
Process rules and habits for editing Z-Image Studio. Companion to CLAUDE.md (which is what & why); this file is how — debugging, verification, deployment, when to commit, when to ship.
Default rule when in doubt: stop and ask the user. The user prefers a question over wrong work.
Investigation before fix
Reproduce the bug before patching
When the user reports a layout, color, click, or visibility issue, first action is verify, not code. Open the local app (http://127.0.0.1:7860) in a browser OR via Playwright (mcp__playwright__browser_*) and reproduce the issue. Take a screenshot. THEN diagnose.
Skipping the visual repro twice in a row will produce a patch that fixes a different symptom than the one the user is seeing.
For shape / data bugs: read the stack trace fully, identify the line, then read the function — don't trust the line number alone.
Pull HF Space logs when something runs there
For Spaces failures, the run logs are the source of truth.
HF_TOKEN=$(cat ~/.cache/huggingface/token)
curl -s -H "Authorization: Bearer ${HF_TOKEN}" \
"https://huggingface.co/api/spaces/techfreakworm/z-image-studio/logs/run" \
> /tmp/hf-runtime.log
# Decode the SSE-style `data: {...}` lines
python3 << 'PY'
import json
msgs = []
for line in open('/tmp/hf-runtime.log'):
if line.startswith('data:'):
try: msgs.append(json.loads(line[5:].strip()).get('data', '').rstrip())
except Exception: pass
with open('/tmp/hf-runtime-decoded.log', 'w') as f:
f.write('\n'.join(msgs))
print(f'Decoded {len(msgs)} lines')
PY
tail -100 /tmp/hf-runtime-decoded.log
/logs/run is runtime container output. /logs/build is the image-build phase (pip install, preload, etc.). Different problems, different endpoints.
Stage check before action
curl -s https://huggingface.co/api/spaces/techfreakworm/z-image-studio/runtime | python3 -m json.tool
Terminal stages: RUNNING, RUNTIME_ERROR, BUILD_ERROR. Transient: BUILDING, APP_STARTING, RUNNING_BUILDING (live serving while a new build runs). Always check errorMessage first when stage is non-RUNNING.
Sequential thinking for repeated failures
The user has called this out: if a fix doesn't work on the first try, stop patching. Use the superpowers:sequential-thinking MCP and the superpowers:systematic-debugging skill. Two failed fixes is the signal — go back to root-cause investigation before attempting fix #3.
Pattern that means you're guessing:
- "Just try changing X and see if it works"
- "I see another thing it could be — fix that too"
- Multiple changes in one commit chasing a symptom
Pattern that means you're investigating:
- One hypothesis per cycle
- Each hypothesis has a falsifying experiment
- Experiments produce evidence before code changes
Running locally
cd /Users/techfreakworm/Projects/llm/z-image-studio
source .venv/bin/activate
# Restart cleanly (kill anything on 7860)
kill -9 $(lsof -ti:7860 2>/dev/null) 2>/dev/null || true
sleep 1
nohup .venv/bin/python app.py > /tmp/zimage-studio.log 2>&1 &
disown
# Wait for ready
for i in $(seq 1 30); do curl -sf http://127.0.0.1:7860/ -o /dev/null && echo "ready ${i}s" && break; sleep 1; done
/tmp/zimage-studio.log is the live log. Tail it during development. The Monitor tool with a grep -E "ERROR|Traceback|Exception" filter is the right way to watch it across many turns without blowing context.
LAN access for phone / tablet testing: http://192.168.0.10:7860 (the LAN IP of the dev machine). Gradio binds to 0.0.0.0:7860 by default in app.py.
Verification before committing
Before every commit:
- Tests pass.
python -m pytest tests/ -q→ target 70/70 + 4 deselected. New code adds new tests. - Ruff clean.
ruff check . && ruff format --check .— both no-op. - App boots. Restart the local server (kill 7860, relaunch). Confirm "ready" within ~5 seconds and no traceback in
/tmp/zimage-studio.log. - The change is visible. For UI changes, click through the affected tab in the browser. For backend changes, click Generate and verify the output matches expectation.
Tests + ruff alone is not proof the UI works — the test suite mocks pipe(...) and doesn't exercise the Gradio render tree.
When to commit
- One logical change per commit. A fix and a refactor are TWO commits, not one.
- After a test goes red → green, commit.
- After fixing a regression, commit BEFORE adding the next feature.
- Don't bundle "while I'm here" changes — they hide the actual fix in the diff.
Conventional Commits format:
<type>(<scope>): <subject>
<body — explains WHY, not what>
Types in use: feat, fix, chore, docs, test, refactor, ci, perf.
NO Claude trailer. NO "Generated with…" footer. See CLAUDE.md rule 1.
Deployment workflow
The repo has two remotes:
origin → git@github.com:techfreakworm/z-image-studio.git
space → https://huggingface.co/spaces/techfreakworm/z-image-studio
To push:
git push origin main
git push space main
After the space push, HF starts rebuilding. Watch:
TOKEN=$(cat ~/.cache/huggingface/token)
while true; do
STATE=$(curl -s -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \
https://huggingface.co/api/spaces/techfreakworm/z-image-studio/runtime \
| python3 -c "import json,sys; print(json.load(sys.stdin).get('stage','?'))")
echo "$(date +%H:%M:%S) $STATE"
case "$STATE" in
RUNNING|BUILD_ERROR|RUNTIME_ERROR) break ;;
esac
sleep 30
done
Typical build time: ~5 min after weights are cached. First build with new preload globs: ~15 – 20 min.
Don't push during HF testing
When the user is actively testing on the live Space, hold local commits — don't push mid-test. They'll explicitly say "push it now" when they're ready.
Adding a new model / weight
- Add a
ModelConfig(...)entry tomodels.MODEL_CONFIGS. - Add the file (or glob) to
preload_from_hub:inREADME.md's YAML frontmatter. - If it's the optional kind DiffSynth fetches lazily (siglip / dinov3 / image2lora), it appears in
_build_pipeline'spool.fetch_model("…")calls — those returnNonewhen absent and don't crash. - If the file is on ModelScope only (e.g.
PAI/…), find the HF mirror first. The repo uses HF exclusively (DIFFSYNTH_DOWNLOAD_SOURCE=huggingface). Common mirror patterns:PAI/X→alibaba-pai/X.xinntao/Real-ESRGAN→lllyasviel/Annotators. - Run tests, restart server, verify in browser, then commit.
Adding a new mode / tab
- Spec the new mode in
docs/superpowers/specs/first. Don't skip this. - Add a
call_<mode>(pipe, params)tomodes.py. Same shape as the existing three. - Add a
build_<mode>_tab()toui.py. Use the existing tabs as template — gr.Radio / gr.Checkbox / gr.Accordion patterns are already proven Gradio-friendly. - Wire
on_<mode>_generate()inapp.pywithprogress=gr.Progress(track_tqdm=True). Connectc["generate_btn"].click(...). - Add tests in
tests/test_modes.pymocking thepipeboundary. - Update tooltips dict in
tooltips.py. - Update the spec + plan to reflect the new mode.
When you have 2+ failed fixes
This is a process signal, not a coding signal. Stop coding.
- Read
superpowers:systematic-debugging(the Iron Law: no fixes without root-cause investigation). - Use
mcp__sequential-thinking__sequentialthinkingto walk through hypotheses one at a time. - Each hypothesis needs a falsifying experiment (a log line, a Playwright eval, a test). Run the experiment before writing code.
- If 3+ fixes have failed, the architecture is wrong — escalate to the user, don't attempt fix #4.
This rule has saved several hours of thrashing in this repo. Honour it.
Brainstorm + visual companion
When making material UI changes, use:
superpowers:brainstormingto clarify what's actually being builtsuperpowers:frontend-design(orfrontend-design:frontend-design) for design quality- The visual companion server (under
.superpowers/brainstorm/.../content/) for mockups the user can click through
The user's .superpowers/ directory is git-ignored and persists per project. Don't prematurely re-mockup — confirm with the user that mockups are wanted before generating them.
The user has rejected over-designed mockups TWICE. Default to RESTRAINT — single accent, single font, gradio-native shapes, progressive disclosure. The Soft Dark Restraint design in this repo is what landed; future redesigns should match its discipline.
Skills + sub-agents
When dispatching subagents (Agent tool):
- Brief them like they walked in cold. They see none of this conversation. Include file paths, line numbers, what to change, what NOT to change.
- Don't make a subagent read the plan file. Paste the relevant section into the prompt.
- Use Opus for design + heavy refactors. Sonnet for mechanical implementation. Haiku for trivial CSS / config changes.
- One subagent per task. Two parallel subagents touching the same file is a guaranteed merge conflict.
- Subagents commit but don't push. The user pushes when they've reviewed the diff locally. The "don't push during HF testing" rule means the human owns the push button.
When in doubt
- Re-read the spec at
docs/superpowers/specs/2026-05-13-z-image-studio-design.md. git log --oneline— every non-obvious decision has a fix-commit explaining the reasoning.- Ask the user. They prefer answering a clarifying question to debugging wrong code an hour later.