Spaces:
Running
Quantum Computing
I have a quantum computer if anyone is interested in accessing it and using it for some science/AI work (roman specifically since you helped me a lot)
lol ty, im kinda new to making ais, so i just get the data :> ok?
Ok, ill give you the link in ~6-7 days
Also, if you have a quantum computer, whats the processor speed lol :>
10^6 gates/s, 10k qubits logical (lol jk, it's not 10k qubits try it out, you will find out) 10^-13 error rate
so... idk what that means... but uhm how does one even get that ;-;
Sorry couldn't respond yesterday ill respond later today. And I messed up the wording there, I couldn't think of other words at that time so it seems unprofessional.
Its "Quantum Processing Unit" not "Quantum Computer"
but still, a QPU is crazy... im still out here on free hf infra and cloud.
like... 55M classifier...
and yeah... imma train a 70m transformer on cpu cause i can :D
try RWKV with an ensemble based routing algortihm for many experts and train them in parallel so you can get most out of it
hows quantum computer going? also is the data bucket good?
So i have made aristotle make a paper on QPU-1 which I will upload to zenodo if that works.
And the data bucket is realy good!
Couldn't find my old comment or the command I wrote, anyway, but I tried to write a circuit, and used all of the common ways of doing so with different packages installed, but I'm not super-involved with quantum computing. Could something have been wrong with the code? Sure. I just copied it.
What I like is the idea that if a quantum computer can use less computation toward the same result classically, it speeds things up drastically. Still hoping on some good Fire Opal, though. I want it run on real quantum hardware, and when possible, simulated, to the same results, for cheaper. I know it sounds a little crazy, but it would put hybrid quantum computing on people's laps, and I think some geniuses owe it to the world to see how well they can fake it until they make it cheaper.
As much as people would hate the analogy or hate the Majorana 1, that's basically topological trying to tease out the same sort of simulated result. It's different enough from what's normally happening in its field to function in superposition, theoretically. The problem is that they arrived at this result statistically, and such things tend not to be science, except in the quantum world, where they're still suspicious, without enough testing. In the quantum world, some "simulated" results are real. I'm hoping on a lot of materials, and graphene is one, but still has a lot of limits as far as I know I'd be curious how you worked out, understanding it's necessary to keep trade secrets as well. Good luck to you, and I hope to see some quantum AI soon, whatever that might be.
Do you think NASA QuAIL would loan out portions of their AI to help build quantum-geared AI for other purposes? That's probably a good start, just porting some basic code and using it for other purposes.
Couldn't find my old comment or the command I wrote, anyway, but I tried to write a circuit, and used all of the common ways of doing so with different packages installed, but I'm not super-involved with quantum computing. Could something have been wrong with the code? Sure. I just copied it.
What I like is the idea that if a quantum computer can use less computation toward the same result classically, it speeds things up drastically. Still hoping on some good Fire Opal, though. I want it run on real quantum hardware, and when possible, simulated, to the same results, for cheaper. I know it sounds a little crazy, but it would put hybrid quantum computing on people's laps, and I think some geniuses owe it to the world to see how well they can fake it until they make it cheaper.
Alright so if you have ANY concerns about the code you had written being wrong, you can paste it here ill debug it for you or you can use the python SDK I have (lapq) and make an AI generate code for you