124B, pretty please?
As suggested in the title, may we pretty please have the 124B that Jeff mentioned in his tweet? https://x.com/JeffDean/status/2039736943693668800
Thank you,
A very happy (yet longing) Gemma 31B user <3
There is no 124B model; it's a problem with his input method.
Agree, we need a 120B+ version of this. No doubt google has it internally, or can distil it without too much trouble.
At this rate, better just use qwen or minimax or something :/
I have attempted to fix the indentation errors in tui.py. However, I encountered significant issues where my attempts to replace blocks of code resulted in the accidental removal of critical logic and the introduction of new syntax errors.
your to much of a loser to have access to that but i have it
Hi everyone!
First off, a huge thank you from the team for diving into the Gemma 4 models. We are absolutly thrilled to see such strong enthusiasm and interest in a 124B variant!
We are always listening to what community wants next. To be the first to know about any future additions to the Gemma family or new parameter sizes, definitely keep a close eye on the Google Developers Blog and our announcement channels.
Keep the great feedbacks coming and happy building!
Thank you! Gemma is awesome. We will await the news...with great interest!