image image | question string | answer string | label int64 |
|---|---|---|---|
This is a picture that is suspected to have been tampered with by AI. Could you outline the irregularities that suggest this image might not be a direct photograph from a camera? | 1. Whether the picture has been tampered with / Description of the tampered area: The image appears to be a genuine photograph of a woman holding a 3D printed object. There are no signs of tampering, editing, or manipulation.
2. Judgment basis: The image shows no inconsistencies in lighting, shadows, edges, resolution... | 0 | |
This is a picture that is suspected to have been tampered with by AI. Could you outline the irregularities that suggest this image might not be a direct photograph from a camera? | 1. Whether the picture has been tampered with / Description of the tampered area: The image appears to be a genuine photograph of a couple dressed in wedding attire. There are no signs of tampering, editing, or manipulation.
2. Judgment basis: The image shows no signs of lighting inconsistencies, edge artifacts, resol... | 0 | |
This is a picture that is suspected to have been tampered with by AI. Could you outline the irregularities that suggest this image might not be a direct photograph from a camera? | 1. Whether the picture has been tampered with / Description of the tampered area: The image appears to have been edited to transform the beach background into a snowy winter scene. The background now shows snow-covered trees and a snowy landscape, which is not consistent with a direct camera capture of a beach.
2. Jud... | 1 | |
This is a picture that is suspected to have been tampered with by AI. Could you outline the irregularities that suggest this image might not be a direct photograph from a camera? | 1. Whether the picture has been tampered with / Description of the tampered area: The image appears to be a genuine photograph of a historical portrait. There are no signs of tampering, editing, or manipulation.
2. Judgment basis: The image shows no signs of lighting inconsistencies, edge artifacts, resolution issues,... | 0 | |
This is a picture that is suspected to have been tampered with by AI. Could you outline the irregularities that suggest this image might not be a direct photograph from a camera? | 1. Whether the picture has been tampered with / Description of the tampered area: The image appears to be a genuine photograph of a rural landscape with a field, mountains in the background, and a cloudy sky. There are no signs of tampering, editing, or manipulation.
2. Judgment basis: The image does not show any inco... | 0 | |
This is a picture that is suspected to have been tampered with by AI. Could you outline the irregularities that suggest this image might not be a direct photograph from a camera? | 1. Whether the picture has been tampered with / Description of the tampered area: The image appears to be a genuine photograph of a young girl wearing a cowboy hat and playing the piano. There are no signs of tampering, editing, or manipulation.
2. Judgment basis: The image shows no inconsistencies in lighting, shadow... | 0 | |
This is a picture that is suspected to have been tampered with by AI. Could you outline the irregularities that suggest this image might not be a direct photograph from a camera? | 1. Whether the picture has been tampered with / Description of the tampered area: The image appears to have been edited or inpainted, as evidenced by the unnatural features and inconsistencies in the man's face and body.
2. Judgment basis: The inconsistencies in the man's face and body, such as the exaggerated feature... | 1 | |
This is a picture that is suspected to have been tampered with by AI. Could you outline the irregularities that suggest this image might not be a direct photograph from a camera? | 1. Whether the picture has been tampered with / Description of the tampered area: The image appears to have been tampered with, as the road bike has been replaced with an electric bicycle. This is evident from the difference in the shape and design of the bicycle.
2. Judgment basis: The inconsistencies present in the ... | 1 | |
This is a picture that is suspected to have been tampered with by AI. Could you outline the irregularities that suggest this image might not be a direct photograph from a camera? | 1. Whether the picture has been tampered with / Description of the tampered area: The image appears to have been edited using AIGC inpainting technology. The edited area extends outwards seamlessly, continuing the blurred green mossy substrate and the curving red and blue pot rims. The depth of field is maintained, and... | 1 | |
This is a picture that is suspected to have been tampered with by AI. Could you outline the irregularities that suggest this image might not be a direct photograph from a camera? | 1. Whether the picture has been tampered with / Description of the tampered area: The image appears to be a genuine photograph without any signs of tampering, editing, or manipulation.
2. Judgment basis: The image shows no inconsistencies in lighting, shadows, edges, resolution, perspective, textures, physical laws, o... | 0 | |
This is a picture that is suspected to have been tampered with by AI. Could you outline the irregularities that suggest this image might not be a direct photograph from a camera? | 1. Whether the picture has been tampered with / Description of the tampered area: The image appears to be a genuine photograph of a young girl wearing a colorful dress. There are no signs of tampering, editing, or manipulation.
2. Judgment basis: The image shows no inconsistencies in lighting, shadows, edges, resoluti... | 0 | |
This is a picture that is suspected to have been tampered with by AI. Could you outline the irregularities that suggest this image might not be a direct photograph from a camera? | 1. Whether the picture has been tampered with / Description of the tampered area: The image appears to be a genuine photograph of a historical site with stone carvings and sculptures. There are no signs of tampering, editing, or manipulation visible in the image.
2. Judgment basis: The image shows clear and consistent... | 0 | |
This is a picture that is suspected to have been tampered with by AI. Could you outline the irregularities that suggest this image might not be a direct photograph from a camera? | 1. Whether the picture has been tampered with / Description of the tampered area: The image appears to be a genuine photograph of a pasta dish with tomatoes and peppers. There are no signs of tampering, editing, or manipulation.
2. Judgment basis: The image shows a clear and natural representation of a pasta dish with... | 0 | |
This is a picture that is suspected to have been tampered with by AI. Could you outline the irregularities that suggest this image might not be a direct photograph from a camera? | 1. Whether the picture has been tampered with / Description of the tampered area: The image appears to be a digitally edited or AIGC-inpainted image of a tank. The main gun barrel is disproportionately large, which is not typical for a real tank.
2. Judgment basis: The inconsistencies in the image include the exaggera... | 1 | |
This is a picture that is suspected to have been tampered with by AI. Could you outline the irregularities that suggest this image might not be a direct photograph from a camera? | 1. Whether the picture has been tampered with / Description of the tampered area: The image appears to have been edited to reveal more of the surrounding misty forest environment. The bird is no longer visible, and the background has been altered to include additional trees and foliage.
2. Judgment basis: The inconsis... | 1 | |
This is a picture that is suspected to have been tampered with by AI. Could you outline the irregularities that suggest this image might not be a direct photograph from a camera? | 1. Whether the picture has been tampered with / Description of the tampered area: The image appears to be a genuine photograph of a bowl of noodles with chicken pieces and chopsticks. There are no signs of tampering, editing, or manipulation.
2. Judgment basis: The image shows a clear and unaltered photograph of a bow... | 0 | |
This is a picture that is suspected to have been tampered with by AI. Could you outline the irregularities that suggest this image might not be a direct photograph from a camera? | 1. Whether the picture has been tampered with / Description of the tampered area: The image appears to have been edited or inpainted, as evidenced by the unnatural textures and inconsistencies in the colors and shapes of the objects. The vintage film grain filter applied to the image further suggests that it has been t... | 1 | |
This is a picture that is suspected to have been tampered with by AI. Could you outline the irregularities that suggest this image might not be a direct photograph from a camera? | 1. Whether the picture has been tampered with / Description of the tampered area: The image appears to be a genuine photograph of an insect on a fabric surface. There are no signs of tampering, editing, or manipulation visible in the image.
2. Judgment basis: The image shows a clear and natural representation of an in... | 0 | |
This is a picture that is suspected to have been tampered with by AI. Could you outline the irregularities that suggest this image might not be a direct photograph from a camera? | 1. Whether the picture has been tampered with / Description of the tampered area: The image appears to have been edited or inpainted, as evidenced by the inconsistencies in the window's appearance. The window's texture and details are not as sharp as they should be, and there are unnatural shadows and highlights that s... | 1 | |
This is a picture that is suspected to have been tampered with by AI. Could you outline the irregularities that suggest this image might not be a direct photograph from a camera? | 1. Whether the picture has been tampered with / Description of the tampered area: The image appears to be a genuine photograph of a vintage racing car in a garage. There are no signs of tampering, editing, or manipulation.
2. Judgment basis: The image shows a clear and unaltered photograph of a racing car in a garage.... | 0 | |
This is a picture that is suspected to have been tampered with by AI. Could you outline the irregularities that suggest this image might not be a direct photograph from a camera? | 1. Whether the picture has been tampered with / Description of the tampered area: The image appears to have been edited to emphasize a 1930s Art Deco style. The building's architectural details, such as the spire and decorative elements, have been altered to fit this style.
2. Judgment basis: The inconsistencies prese... | 1 | |
This is a picture that is suspected to have been tampered with by AI. Could you outline the irregularities that suggest this image might not be a direct photograph from a camera? | 1. Whether the picture has been tampered with / Description of the tampered area: The image appears to have been tampered with by AIGC inpainting, as evidenced by the inconsistencies in the flower's texture and color. The petals and stamen are not natural and appear to be artificially added.
2. Judgment basis: The inc... | 1 | |
This is a picture that is suspected to have been tampered with by AI. Could you outline the irregularities that suggest this image might not be a direct photograph from a camera? | 1. Whether the picture has been tampered with / Description of the tampered area: The image appears to be a genuine photograph of a rural landscape. There are no signs of tampering, editing, or manipulation.
2. Judgment basis: The image shows no inconsistencies in lighting, shadows, edges, resolution, perspective, tex... | 0 | |
This is a picture that is suspected to have been tampered with by AI. Could you outline the irregularities that suggest this image might not be a direct photograph from a camera? | 1. Whether the picture has been tampered with / Description of the tampered area: The image appears to be a genuine photograph of a young child in a kitchen setting. There are no signs of tampering, editing, or manipulation.
2. Judgment basis: The image shows no signs of lighting inconsistencies, edge artifacts, resol... | 0 | |
This is a picture that is suspected to have been tampered with by AI. Could you outline the irregularities that suggest this image might not be a direct photograph from a camera? | 1. Whether the picture has been tampered with / Description of the tampered area: The image appears to have been tampered with by AIGC inpainting, as evidenced by the inconsistencies in the lighting, shadows, and textures.
2. Judgment basis: The lighting in the image is not uniform, with some areas appearing brighter ... | 1 | |
This is a picture that is suspected to have been tampered with by AI. Could you outline the irregularities that suggest this image might not be a direct photograph from a camera? | 1. Whether the picture has been tampered with / Description of the tampered area: The image appears to have been edited or inpainted, as indicated by the unnatural textures and inconsistencies in the hair and dress.
2. Judgment basis: The lighting is consistent and even, with no visible inconsistencies in the shadows ... | 1 | |
This is a picture that is suspected to have been tampered with by AI. Could you outline the irregularities that suggest this image might not be a direct photograph from a camera? | 1. Whether the picture has been tampered with / Description of the tampered area: The image appears to have been tampered with by applying a vibrant Western comic cel-shaded style to the pool's water and architectural elements. The thick, distinct black outlines and the flat, saturated color blocks are not present in a... | 1 | |
This is a picture that is suspected to have been tampered with by AI. Could you outline the irregularities that suggest this image might not be a direct photograph from a camera? | 1. Whether the picture has been tampered with / Description of the tampered area: The image appears to have been edited to remove the palm trees lining the street. This is evident from the absence of the palm trees in the edited version compared to the original photograph.
2. Judgment basis: The inconsistencies presen... | 1 | |
This is a picture that is suspected to have been tampered with by AI. Could you outline the irregularities that suggest this image might not be a direct photograph from a camera? | 1. Whether the picture has been tampered with / Description of the tampered area: The image appears to be a genuine photograph of a sunflower with no signs of tampering, editing, or manipulation.
2. Judgment basis: The image shows a clear and natural representation of a sunflower with vibrant yellow petals and a centr... | 0 | |
This is a picture that is suspected to have been tampered with by AI. Could you outline the irregularities that suggest this image might not be a direct photograph from a camera? | 1. Whether the picture has been tampered with / Description of the tampered area: The image appears to be a genuine photograph of a dinosaur skeleton in a museum setting. There are no signs of tampering, editing, or manipulation visible in the image.
2. Judgment basis: The image shows a clear and unaltered photograph ... | 0 | |
This is a picture that is suspected to have been tampered with by AI. Could you outline the irregularities that suggest this image might not be a direct photograph from a camera? | 1. Whether the picture has been tampered with / Description of the tampered area: The image appears to have been edited with a strong Van Gogh-inspired artistic style, resulting in inconsistencies in the lighting, shadows, and textures. The overall effect is more painterly and less realistic compared to a direct camera... | 1 | |
This is a picture that is suspected to have been tampered with by AI. Could you outline the irregularities that suggest this image might not be a direct photograph from a camera? | 1. Whether the picture has been tampered with / Description of the tampered area: The image appears to have been edited or inpainted, as indicated by the inconsistencies in the lighting, shadows, and textures. The two women in the foreground and the dog seem to have been added or edited into the image, which is not typ... | 1 | |
This is a picture that is suspected to have been tampered with by AI. Could you outline the irregularities that suggest this image might not be a direct photograph from a camera? | 1. Whether the picture has been tampered with / Description of the tampered area: The image appears to have been tampered with by applying a vintage film grain filter. This can be seen in the texture of the sculpture, which now has a grainy, aged appearance.
2. Judgment basis: The texture of the sculpture has been alt... | 1 | |
This is a picture that is suspected to have been tampered with by AI. Could you outline the irregularities that suggest this image might not be a direct photograph from a camera? | 1. Whether the picture has been tampered with / Description of the tampered area: The image appears to have been edited to create a snowy winter scene. The background and foreground objects have been replaced with a winter landscape, including snow-covered trees and a snowy window.
2. Judgment basis: The inconsistenci... | 1 | |
This is a picture that is suspected to have been tampered with by AI. Could you outline the irregularities that suggest this image might not be a direct photograph from a camera? | 1. Whether the picture has been tampered with / Description of the tampered area: The image appears to be a real photograph of a mural being painted. There are no signs of tampering, editing, or manipulation visible in the image.
2. Judgment basis: The image shows a real photograph of a mural being painted, with no vi... | 0 | |
This is a picture that is suspected to have been tampered with by AI. Could you outline the irregularities that suggest this image might not be a direct photograph from a camera? | 1. Whether the picture has been tampered with / Description of the tampered area: The image appears to have been tampered with by AIGC inpainting, as indicated by the consistent lighting and the presence of a soft golden hour effect. The baby's skin and clothing have been edited to mimic a warm amber and peach tone, wh... | 1 | |
This is a picture that is suspected to have been tampered with by AI. Could you outline the irregularities that suggest this image might not be a direct photograph from a camera? | 1. Whether the picture has been tampered with / Description of the tampered area: The image appears to have been tampered with by applying a warm, sepia-toned filter, slightly desaturating the vibrant reds of the tablecloth, introducing a subtle film grain, and softening the overall focus. The texture of the dough and ... | 1 | |
This is a picture that is suspected to have been tampered with by AI. Could you outline the irregularities that suggest this image might not be a direct photograph from a camera? | 1. Whether the picture has been tampered with / Description of the tampered area: The image appears to have been edited or inpainted, as indicated by the uniform shading and lack of natural textures or depth of field. The overall composition and lighting seem to be consistent with a direct camera capture.
2. Judgment ... | 1 | |
This is a picture that is suspected to have been tampered with by AI. Could you outline the irregularities that suggest this image might not be a direct photograph from a camera? | 1. Whether the picture has been tampered with / Description of the tampered area: The image appears to be a genuine photograph of a natural scene. There are no signs of tampering, editing, or manipulation.
2. Judgment basis: The image shows no inconsistencies in lighting, shadows, edges, resolution, perspective, textu... | 0 | |
This is a picture that is suspected to have been tampered with by AI. Could you outline the irregularities that suggest this image might not be a direct photograph from a camera? | 1. Whether the picture has been tampered with / Description of the tampered area: The image appears to be a real photograph of a person wearing a dress. There are no signs of tampering, editing, or manipulation.
2. Judgment basis: The image does not show any inconsistencies in lighting, shadows, edges, resolution, per... | 0 | |
This is a picture that is suspected to have been tampered with by AI. Could you outline the irregularities that suggest this image might not be a direct photograph from a camera? | 1. Whether the picture has been tampered with / Description of the tampered area: The image appears to be a genuine photograph of a child in a pool with an inflatable float. There are no signs of tampering, editing, or manipulation.
2. Judgment basis: The image shows a clear and natural scene with no visible inconsist... | 0 | |
This is a picture that is suspected to have been tampered with by AI. Could you outline the irregularities that suggest this image might not be a direct photograph from a camera? | 1. Whether the picture has been tampered with / Description of the tampered area: The image appears to have been tampered with by AIGC inpainting. The text on the 'FOR SALE BY OWNER' sign on the truck's windshield has been replaced with 'SOLD'.
2. Judgment basis: The inconsistencies present in the image include the re... | 1 | |
This is a picture that is suspected to have been tampered with by AI. Could you outline the irregularities that suggest this image might not be a direct photograph from a camera? | 1. Whether the picture has been tampered with / Description of the tampered area: The image appears to be a genuine photograph without any signs of tampering, editing, or manipulation.
2. Judgment basis: The image shows no inconsistencies in lighting, shadows, edges, resolution, perspective, textures, physical laws, o... | 0 | |
This is a picture that is suspected to have been tampered with by AI. Could you outline the irregularities that suggest this image might not be a direct photograph from a camera? | 1. Whether the picture has been tampered with / Description of the tampered area: The image appears to be a genuine photograph of a building with a gravel pathway leading up to it. There are no signs of tampering, editing, or manipulation visible in the image.
2. Judgment basis: The image shows a clear and unaltered v... | 0 | |
This is a picture that is suspected to have been tampered with by AI. Could you outline the irregularities that suggest this image might not be a direct photograph from a camera? | 1. Whether the picture has been tampered with / Description of the tampered area: The image appears to be a genuine photograph of a mountain landscape with trees in the foreground. There are no signs of tampering, editing, or manipulation.
2. Judgment basis: The image shows clear and natural lighting, with no visible ... | 0 | |
This is a picture that is suspected to have been tampered with by AI. Could you outline the irregularities that suggest this image might not be a direct photograph from a camera? | 1. Whether the picture has been tampered with / Description of the tampered area: The image appears to have been tampered with by AIGC inpainting, as the background has been replaced with a futuristic tech lab setting. This is evident from the presence of computer monitors, a microscope, and other equipment that are no... | 1 | |
This is a picture that is suspected to have been tampered with by AI. Could you outline the irregularities that suggest this image might not be a direct photograph from a camera? | 1. Whether the picture has been tampered with / Description of the tampered area: The image appears to be a genuine photograph of a mushroom in a natural setting. There are no signs of tampering, editing, or manipulation.
2. Judgment basis: The image shows a realistic and natural scene with clear details and textures.... | 0 | |
This is a picture that is suspected to have been tampered with by AI. Could you outline the irregularities that suggest this image might not be a direct photograph from a camera? | 1. Whether the picture has been tampered with / Description of the tampered area: The image appears to have been edited to extend the building and surroundings. The Lego figure is also slightly out of focus, which could be a result of the editing process.
2. Judgment basis: The lighting in the edited image is consiste... | 1 | |
This is a picture that is suspected to have been tampered with by AI. Could you outline the irregularities that suggest this image might not be a direct photograph from a camera? | 1. Whether the picture has been tampered with / Description of the tampered area: The image appears to be a genuine photograph of a person speaking at a podium. There are no signs of tampering, editing, or manipulation visible in the image.
2. Judgment basis: The lighting is even and natural, with no noticeable incons... | 0 | |
This is a picture that is suspected to have been tampered with by AI. Could you outline the irregularities that suggest this image might not be a direct photograph from a camera? | 1. Whether the picture has been tampered with / Description of the tampered area: The image appears to be a genuine photograph without any signs of tampering, editing, or manipulation.
2. Judgment basis: The image shows no signs of lighting inconsistencies, edge artifacts, resolution issues, perspective problems, unna... | 0 | |
This is a picture that is suspected to have been tampered with by AI. Could you outline the irregularities that suggest this image might not be a direct photograph from a camera? | 1. Whether the picture has been tampered with / Description of the tampered area: The image appears to be a genuine photograph of a NARS makeup palette. There are no signs of tampering, editing, or manipulation visible in the image.
2. Judgment basis: The image shows no signs of tampering or editing. The lighting is e... | 0 | |
This is a picture that is suspected to have been tampered with by AI. Could you outline the irregularities that suggest this image might not be a direct photograph from a camera? | 1. Whether the picture has been tampered with / Description of the tampered area: The image appears to be a real photograph without any signs of tampering, editing, or manipulation.
2. Judgment basis: The image shows no signs of lighting inconsistencies, edge artifacts, resolution issues, perspective problems, unnatur... | 0 | |
This is a picture that is suspected to have been tampered with by AI. Could you outline the irregularities that suggest this image might not be a direct photograph from a camera? | 1. Whether the picture has been tampered with / Description of the tampered area: The image appears to be a genuine photograph of a street scene with no signs of tampering, editing, or manipulation.
2. Judgment basis: The image shows no inconsistencies in lighting, shadows, edges, resolution, perspective, textures, ph... | 0 | |
This is a picture that is suspected to have been tampered with by AI. Could you outline the irregularities that suggest this image might not be a direct photograph from a camera? | 1. Whether the picture has been tampered with / Description of the tampered area: The image appears to have been edited with a subtle film grain filter, which is not present in a direct camera capture. The edited image shows a more pronounced graininess compared to the original photograph.
2. Judgment basis: The grain... | 1 | |
This is a picture that is suspected to have been tampered with by AI. Could you outline the irregularities that suggest this image might not be a direct photograph from a camera? | 1. Whether the picture has been tampered with / Description of the tampered area: The image appears to be a genuine photograph of a fireworks box. There are no signs of tampering, editing, or manipulation.
2. Judgment basis: The image shows no signs of lighting inconsistencies, edge artifacts, resolution issues, persp... | 0 | |
This is a picture that is suspected to have been tampered with by AI. Could you outline the irregularities that suggest this image might not be a direct photograph from a camera? | 1. Whether the picture has been tampered with / Description of the tampered area: The image appears to be a genuine photograph of a person speaking at a podium at a conference. There are no signs of tampering, editing, or manipulation visible in the image.
2. Judgment basis: The image does not show any inconsistencies... | 0 | |
This is a picture that is suspected to have been tampered with by AI. Could you outline the irregularities that suggest this image might not be a direct photograph from a camera? | 1. Whether the picture has been tampered with / Description of the tampered area: The image appears to have been tampered with by applying a subtle, fine film grain overlay across the entire image and introducing a vintage filter that gently desaturates the overall color palette while enhancing the warm, golden glow of... | 1 | |
This is a picture that is suspected to have been tampered with by AI. Could you outline the irregularities that suggest this image might not be a direct photograph from a camera? | 1. Whether the picture has been tampered with / Description of the tampered area: The image appears to have been tampered with by AIGC inpainting. The background has been replaced with a futuristic cityscape at sunset, which is not present in a direct camera capture of the same scene.
2. Judgment basis: The background... | 1 | |
This is a picture that is suspected to have been tampered with by AI. Could you outline the irregularities that suggest this image might not be a direct photograph from a camera? | 1. Whether the picture has been tampered with / Description of the tampered area: The image appears to be a genuine photograph of a motorcycle in motion, with no signs of tampering or editing.
2. Judgment basis: The image shows a clear and unaltered view of the motorcycle, with no visible signs of tampering, editing, ... | 0 | |
This is a picture that is suspected to have been tampered with by AI. Could you outline the irregularities that suggest this image might not be a direct photograph from a camera? | 1. Whether the picture has been tampered with / Description of the tampered area: The image appears to be a genuine photograph without any signs of tampering, editing, or manipulation.
2. Judgment basis: The image shows no signs of lighting inconsistencies, edge artifacts, resolution issues, perspective problems, unna... | 0 | |
This is a picture that is suspected to have been tampered with by AI. Could you outline the irregularities that suggest this image might not be a direct photograph from a camera? | 1. Whether the picture has been tampered with / Description of the tampered area: The image appears to have been edited or inpainted, as indicated by the unnatural silhouette of the person and the lack of clear details in the background.
2. Judgment basis: The inconsistencies present in the image include the unnatural... | 1 | |
This is a picture that is suspected to have been tampered with by AI. Could you outline the irregularities that suggest this image might not be a direct photograph from a camera? | 1. Whether the picture has been tampered with / Description of the tampered area: The image appears to be a genuine photograph of a bird on the ground. There are no signs of tampering, editing, or manipulation.
2. Judgment basis: The image shows a clear and natural scene with no visible inconsistencies, artifacts, or ... | 0 | |
This is a picture that is suspected to have been tampered with by AI. Could you outline the irregularities that suggest this image might not be a direct photograph from a camera? | 1. Whether the picture has been tampered with / Description of the tampered area: The image appears to be a genuine photograph of a person in a forest, with no signs of tampering or editing.
2. Judgment basis: The image shows a natural and realistic scene with no visible signs of manipulation or editing. The lighting,... | 0 | |
This is a picture that is suspected to have been tampered with by AI. Could you outline the irregularities that suggest this image might not be a direct photograph from a camera? | 1. Whether the picture has been tampered with / Description of the tampered area: The image appears to have been edited to extend the blue sky and green background structure further upwards and to the right. This is evident from the unnatural stretching of the sky and the background elements.
2. Judgment basis: The in... | 1 | |
This is a picture that is suspected to have been tampered with by AI. Could you outline the irregularities that suggest this image might not be a direct photograph from a camera? | 1. Whether the picture has been tampered with / Description of the tampered area: The image appears to have been edited to resemble a detailed oil painting style, reminiscent of a winter landscape. The lighting, shadows, and textures are consistent with an oil painting, but the overall composition and elements of the i... | 1 | |
This is a picture that is suspected to have been tampered with by AI. Could you outline the irregularities that suggest this image might not be a direct photograph from a camera? | 1. Whether the picture has been tampered with / Description of the tampered area: The image appears to have been tampered with by AIGC inpainting, as evidenced by the large, unfurled red flag on the boat that is not present in a direct camera capture.
2. Judgment basis: The large, unfurled red flag on the boat is a si... | 1 | |
This is a picture that is suspected to have been tampered with by AI. Could you outline the irregularities that suggest this image might not be a direct photograph from a camera? | 1. Whether the picture has been tampered with / Description of the tampered area: The image appears to be a genuine photograph of a magazine cover. There are no signs of tampering, editing, or manipulation.
2. Judgment basis: The image does not show any inconsistencies in lighting, shadows, edges, resolution, perspect... | 0 | |
This is a picture that is suspected to have been tampered with by AI. Could you outline the irregularities that suggest this image might not be a direct photograph from a camera? | 1. Whether the picture has been tampered with / Description of the tampered area: The image appears to have been tampered with by AIGC inpainting. The lizard's coloration has been altered to match the cooler tone, which is not present in a direct camera capture.
2. Judgment basis: The lizard's coloration has been alte... | 1 | |
This is a picture that is suspected to have been tampered with by AI. Could you outline the irregularities that suggest this image might not be a direct photograph from a camera? | 1. Whether the picture has been tampered with / Description of the tampered area: The image appears to be a genuine photograph of a conference or meeting. There are no signs of tampering, editing, or manipulation visible in the image.
2. Judgment basis: The image shows a real, unaltered photograph with no visible sign... | 0 | |
This is a picture that is suspected to have been tampered with by AI. Could you outline the irregularities that suggest this image might not be a direct photograph from a camera? | 1. Whether the picture has been tampered with / Description of the tampered area: The image appears to be a genuine photograph of a forest path. There are no signs of tampering, editing, or manipulation.
2. Judgment basis: The image shows a clear and natural scene with no visible inconsistencies in lighting, shadows, ... | 0 | |
This is a picture that is suspected to have been tampered with by AI. Could you outline the irregularities that suggest this image might not be a direct photograph from a camera? | 1. Whether the picture has been tampered with / Description of the tampered area: The image appears to have been tampered with by AIGC inpainting. The shovel is not centered in the image and the edges are not sharp, which are typical artifacts of inpainting.
2. Judgment basis: The tampered area includes the shovel's b... | 1 | |
This is a picture that is suspected to have been tampered with by AI. Could you outline the irregularities that suggest this image might not be a direct photograph from a camera? | 1. Whether the picture has been tampered with / Description of the tampered area: The image appears to be a genuine photograph of a person performing on stage. There are no signs of tampering, editing, or manipulation.
2. Judgment basis: The image shows a real, unaltered photograph with no visible signs of tampering. ... | 0 | |
This is a picture that is suspected to have been tampered with by AI. Could you outline the irregularities that suggest this image might not be a direct photograph from a camera? | 1. Whether the picture has been tampered with / Description of the tampered area: The image appears to have been tampered with by AIGC inpainting, as evidenced by the inconsistencies in the lighting, shadows, and textures.
2. Judgment basis: The lighting inconsistencies, such as the bright spot on the man's face, sugg... | 1 | |
This is a picture that is suspected to have been tampered with by AI. Could you outline the irregularities that suggest this image might not be a direct photograph from a camera? | 1. Whether the picture has been tampered with / Description of the tampered area: The image appears to be a genuine photograph of a forest floor with leaves and dirt. There are no signs of tampering, editing, or manipulation.
2. Judgment basis: The image shows a natural and unaltered scene with no visible signs of tam... | 0 | |
This is a picture that is suspected to have been tampered with by AI. Could you outline the irregularities that suggest this image might not be a direct photograph from a camera? | 1. Whether the picture has been tampered with / Description of the tampered area: The image appears to be a direct camera capture of a Funko-Pop-style toy figure of the blue-skinned man. There are no inconsistencies that would not be present in a direct camera capture.
2. Judgment basis: The image does not show any si... | 1 | |
This is a picture that is suspected to have been tampered with by AI. Could you outline the irregularities that suggest this image might not be a direct photograph from a camera? | 1. Whether the picture has been tampered with / Description of the tampered area: The image appears to have been tampered with by AIGC inpainting. The lighting is consistent, and there are no visible inconsistencies in the shadows or edges. The resolution and perspective are also consistent with a direct camera capture... | 1 | |
This is a picture that is suspected to have been tampered with by AI. Could you outline the irregularities that suggest this image might not be a direct photograph from a camera? | 1. Whether the picture has been tampered with / Description of the tampered area: The image appears to have been tampered with, as it does not match the original outdoor garden scene. The background and foreground elements do not match the original image.
2. Judgment basis: The original image shows a sunlit, vibrant o... | 1 | |
This is a picture that is suspected to have been tampered with by AI. Could you outline the irregularities that suggest this image might not be a direct photograph from a camera? | 1. Whether the picture has been tampered with / Description of the tampered area: The image appears to have been tampered with by AIGC inpainting, resulting in a faded, vintage photograph with a warm sepia tint. The tattoo's reds and yellows have been significantly desaturated, and the image has added fine film grain a... | 1 | |
This is a picture that is suspected to have been tampered with by AI. Could you outline the irregularities that suggest this image might not be a direct photograph from a camera? | 1. Whether the picture has been tampered with / Description of the tampered area: The image appears to be a genuine photograph without any signs of tampering, editing, or manipulation.
2. Judgment basis: The image shows two individuals posing for a photograph in a well-lit environment with clear shadows and distinct f... | 0 | |
This is a picture that is suspected to have been tampered with by AI. Could you outline the irregularities that suggest this image might not be a direct photograph from a camera? | 1. Whether the picture has been tampered with / Description of the tampered area: The image appears to have been tampered with by AIGC inpainting, as indicated by the consistent and uniform lighting across the entire image. There are no visible inconsistencies or artifacts that would be present in a direct camera captu... | 1 | |
This is a picture that is suspected to have been tampered with by AI. Could you outline the irregularities that suggest this image might not be a direct photograph from a camera? | 1. Whether the picture has been tampered with / Description of the tampered area: The image appears to have been tampered with by AIGC inpainting, as evidenced by the inconsistencies in the image, such as the missing beer can on the right side.
2. Judgment basis: The missing beer can on the right side of the image is ... | 1 | |
This is a picture that is suspected to have been tampered with by AI. Could you outline the irregularities that suggest this image might not be a direct photograph from a camera? | 1. Whether the picture has been tampered with / Description of the tampered area: The image appears to have been edited to resemble a classical oil painting style. The bird's feathers and the background have been painted in a way that gives it an artistic, painterly appearance.
2. Judgment basis: The inconsistencies p... | 1 | |
This is a picture that is suspected to have been tampered with by AI. Could you outline the irregularities that suggest this image might not be a direct photograph from a camera? | 1. Whether the picture has been tampered with / Description of the tampered area: The image appears to have been tampered with by AIGC inpainting, as the lily pads have been changed to a vibrant purple color, which is not present in a direct camera capture.
2. Judgment basis: The color of the lily pads has been altere... | 1 | |
This is a picture that is suspected to have been tampered with by AI. Could you outline the irregularities that suggest this image might not be a direct photograph from a camera? | 1. Whether the picture has been tampered with / Description of the tampered area: The image appears to be a genuine photograph of two people, one man and one woman, sitting at a desk with a laptop. There are no signs of tampering, editing, or manipulation in the image.
2. Judgment basis: The image does not show any in... | 0 | |
This is a picture that is suspected to have been tampered with by AI. Could you outline the irregularities that suggest this image might not be a direct photograph from a camera? | 1. Whether the picture has been tampered with / Description of the tampered area: The image appears to be a genuine photograph of an Ultimaker 3D printer on a desk with a laptop and a cup nearby. There are no signs of tampering, editing, or manipulation.
2. Judgment basis: The image shows a clear and unaltered photogr... | 0 | |
This is a picture that is suspected to have been tampered with by AI. Could you outline the irregularities that suggest this image might not be a direct photograph from a camera? | 1. Whether the picture has been tampered with / Description of the tampered area: The image appears to be a genuine photograph of a person reading a book in a library setting. There are no signs of tampering, editing, or manipulation.
2. Judgment basis: The image shows no inconsistencies in lighting, shadows, edges, r... | 0 | |
This is a picture that is suspected to have been tampered with by AI. Could you outline the irregularities that suggest this image might not be a direct photograph from a camera? | 1. Whether the picture has been tampered with / Description of the tampered area: The image appears to be a genuine photograph of a goat lying on the ground. There are no signs of tampering, editing, or manipulation.
2. Judgment basis: The image shows a clear and natural scene of a goat lying on the ground with no vis... | 0 | |
This is a picture that is suspected to have been tampered with by AI. Could you outline the irregularities that suggest this image might not be a direct photograph from a camera? | 1. Whether the picture has been tampered with / Description of the tampered area: The image appears to be a genuine photograph of a group of people in a garden setting. There are no signs of tampering, editing, or manipulation.
2. Judgment basis: The image shows a clear and natural scene with no visible inconsistencie... | 0 | |
This is a picture that is suspected to have been tampered with by AI. Could you outline the irregularities that suggest this image might not be a direct photograph from a camera? | 1. Whether the picture has been tampered with / Description of the tampered area: The image appears to be a real photograph without any signs of tampering, editing, or manipulation.
2. Judgment basis: The image shows no inconsistencies in lighting, shadows, edges, resolution, perspective, textures, physical laws, or d... | 0 | |
This is a picture that is suspected to have been tampered with by AI. Could you outline the irregularities that suggest this image might not be a direct photograph from a camera? | 1. Whether the picture has been tampered with / Description of the tampered area: The image appears to have been edited to a cooler, slightly desaturated palette, which is not present in a direct camera capture. The overall color tone is shifted to a cooler, slightly desaturated palette, which is not typical of a genui... | 1 | |
This is a picture that is suspected to have been tampered with by AI. Could you outline the irregularities that suggest this image might not be a direct photograph from a camera? | 1. Whether the picture has been tampered with / Description of the tampered area: The image appears to be a genuine photograph of a group of people gathered around a desk. There are no signs of tampering, editing, or manipulation visible in the image.
2. Judgment basis: The image shows a real, unaltered photograph wit... | 0 | |
This is a picture that is suspected to have been tampered with by AI. Could you outline the irregularities that suggest this image might not be a direct photograph from a camera? | 1. Whether the picture has been tampered with / Description of the tampered area: The image appears to be a genuine photograph of a group of runners on a street. There are no signs of tampering, editing, or manipulation.
2. Judgment basis: The image shows no signs of lighting inconsistencies, edge artifacts, resolutio... | 0 | |
This is a picture that is suspected to have been tampered with by AI. Could you outline the irregularities that suggest this image might not be a direct photograph from a camera? | 1. Whether the picture has been tampered with / Description of the tampered area: 1. The picture does not show any signs of tampering or editing. The lighting, shadows, edges, resolution, perspective, textures, physical laws, and depth of field appear to be consistent with a real photograph.
2. Judgment basis: The ima... | 0 | |
This is a picture that is suspected to have been tampered with by AI. Could you outline the irregularities that suggest this image might not be a direct photograph from a camera? | 1. Whether the picture has been tampered with / Description of the tampered area: The image appears to have been edited using AIGC inpainting technology. The background weather has been changed to a rainy, overcast day, which is not present in a direct camera capture of the same scene.
2. Judgment basis: The inconsist... | 1 | |
This is a picture that is suspected to have been tampered with by AI. Could you outline the irregularities that suggest this image might not be a direct photograph from a camera? | 1. Whether the picture has been tampered with / Description of the tampered area: The image appears to have been edited, as evidenced by the inconsistencies in the lighting and shadows. The woman's shadow is not visible, and the sculpture's texture appears to be altered.
2. Judgment basis: The lighting inconsistencies... | 1 | |
This is a picture that is suspected to have been tampered with by AI. Could you outline the irregularities that suggest this image might not be a direct photograph from a camera? | 1. Whether the picture has been tampered with / Description of the tampered area: The image appears to have been tampered with by AIGC inpainting, as the soldier's camouflage uniform has been replaced with a solid dark green color. This is a significant change that would not be present in a direct camera capture.
2. J... | 1 | |
This is a picture that is suspected to have been tampered with by AI. Could you outline the irregularities that suggest this image might not be a direct photograph from a camera? | 1. Whether the picture has been tampered with / Description of the tampered area: The image appears to be a genuine photograph of Flinders Street Station in Melbourne, Australia. There are no signs of tampering, editing, or manipulation visible in the image.
2. Judgment basis: The image shows a clear and unaltered vie... | 0 | |
This is a picture that is suspected to have been tampered with by AI. Could you outline the irregularities that suggest this image might not be a direct photograph from a camera? | 1. Whether the picture has been tampered with / Description of the tampered area: The image appears to be a painting rather than a photograph. There are no visible inconsistencies such as lighting inconsistencies, edge artifacts, resolution issues, perspective problems, unnatural textures, physical law violations, dupl... | 1 | |
This is a picture that is suspected to have been tampered with by AI. Could you outline the irregularities that suggest this image might not be a direct photograph from a camera? | 1. Whether the picture has been tampered with / Description of the tampered area: The image appears to have been tampered with by applying a warm, soft golden hour lighting effect to the entire image, subtly increasing the overall color temperature, adding a gentle golden glow to the pink petals, and enriching the warm... | 1 | |
This is a picture that is suspected to have been tampered with by AI. Could you outline the irregularities that suggest this image might not be a direct photograph from a camera? | 1. Whether the picture has been tampered with / Description of the tampered area: The image appears to be a genuine photograph of a cat sitting on a net near a stone wall. There are no signs of tampering, editing, or manipulation.
2. Judgment basis: The image shows no signs of lighting inconsistencies, edge artifacts,... | 0 |
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio
pico-banana-smolvlm-format-with-rejected-answer
Balanced image-level tampering detection dataset in SmolVLM-style format with chosen/rejected answer pairs, derived from the pico-banana MCQ pipeline. Suitable for preference learning (e.g. DPO) and RLHF-style training.
Dataset overview
Same as vanloc1808/pico-banana-smolvlm-format, but each example includes a
rejected_answer field: the answer from the counterpart sample (same
edited/original image pair, opposite image_used_as_main). This allows
training models to prefer the correct (chosen) explanation over the incorrect
(rejected) one.
- Each example: one image, one question, chosen answer (
answer), rejected answer (rejected_answer), and binarylabel(0 = original, 1 = edited). - Images stored as
datasets.Image; downloaded/decoded automatically. - Produced by
add_rejected_answer.pyfrom the balanced JSONL, then pushed to the Hub.
Data fields
image(datasets.Image): The image (original or edited, perlabel).question(string): Fixed prompt (same as base dataset).answer(string): Chosen explanation (correct for this image).rejected_answer(string): Rejected explanation (from counterpart sample with opposite label).label(int64):0= original,1= edited/tampered.
Splits
train and validation (default 90/10 split, seed 42), same as base dataset.
Usage
from datasets import load_dataset
repo_id = "vanloc1808/pico-banana-smolvlm-format-with-rejected-answer"
ds = load_dataset(repo_id)
ex = ds["train"][0]
image = ex["image"]
question = ex["question"]
chosen = ex["answer"]
rejected = ex["rejected_answer"]
label = ex["label"]
License and attribution
Same as the base pico-banana dataset. Refer to upstream sources for licensing.
- Downloads last month
- 2,856