Dataset Viewer
Auto-converted to Parquet Duplicate
text
stringlengths
139
572k
label
int64
0
10
decision_direction
int64
0
1
respondent_type
int64
0
4
United States Supreme Court FOGARTY v. UNITED STATES(1950) No. 1669 Argued: October 10, 1950Decided: November 6, 1950 </s> In the circumstances of this case, held that the corporation of which petitioner is trustee in bankruptcy and which had contracts with the Navy Department for the production of war materials, did ...
6
1
3
United States Supreme Court PURKETT v. ELEM(1995) No. 94-802 Argued: Decided: May 15, 1995 </s> PER CURIAM. </s> Respondent was convicted of second-degree robbery in a Missouri court. During jury selection, he objected to the prosecutor's use of peremptory challenges to strike two black men from the jury panel, an obje...
1
0
1
United States Supreme Court ALOHA AIRLINES, INC. v. DIRECTOR OF TAXATION(1983) No. 82-585 Argued: October 4, 1983Decided: November 1, 1983 </s> A Hawaii statute imposes a tax on the annual gross income of airlines operating within the State, and declares that such tax is a means of taxing an airline's personal propert...
9
1
3
United States Supreme Court SPINELLI v. UNITED STATES(1969) No. 8 Argued: Decided: January 27, 1969 </s> Petitioner was convicted of illegal interstate gambling activities despite his claim that the Commissioner's warrant authorizing the FBI search that uncovered evidence used at his trial violated the Fourth Amendmen...
0
1
3
United States Supreme Court BOYNTON v. VIRGINIA(1960) No. 7 Argued: October 12, 1960Decided: December 5, 1960 </s> For refusing to leave the section reserved for white people in a restaurant in a bus terminal, petitioner, a Negro interstate bus passenger, was convicted in Virginia courts of violating a state statute m...
1
1
3
"United States Supreme Court MORISSETTE v. UNITED STATES(1952) No. 12 Argued: Decided: January 7, 19(...TRUNCATED)
0
1
3
"United States Supreme Court R. J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO CO. v. DURHAM COUNTY(1986) No. 85-1021 Argued: O(...TRUNCATED)
6
1
3
"United States Supreme Court McADAMS v. McSURELY(1978) No. 76-1621 Argued: March 1, 1978Decided: Jun(...TRUNCATED)
8
0
1
"United States Supreme Court MATSUSHITA ELEC. INDUSTRIAL CO. v. ZENITH RADIO(1986) No. 83-2004 Argue(...TRUNCATED)
6
0
2
"United States Supreme Court VAN LARE v. HURLEY(1975) No. 74-453 Argued: March 26, 1975Decided: May (...TRUNCATED)
1
1
1
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio

Dataset Card for the SCOTUS lifelong editing task

Dataset Summary

This dataset contains a relabeled sample from the SCOTUS dataset in fairlex as described in our paper

Citation Information

@article{hartvigsen2023aging,
  title={Aging with GRACE: Lifelong Model Editing with Discrete Key-Value Adapters},
  author={Hartvigsen, Thomas and Sankaranarayanan, Swami and Palangi, Hamid and Kim, Yoon and Ghassemi, Marzyeh},
  journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.11031},
  year={2023}
}
Downloads last month
218

Paper for tomh/grace-scotus