Goal stringlengths 5 167 | Plan stringlengths 21 3.63k ⌀ | Question stringlengths 30 207 | Ground Truth stringclasses 261
values | domain stringclasses 4
values | analysis stringclasses 8
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(and (at package1 s3) (at package2 s2) (at package3 s2) (at package4 s1)) | 1: walk(driver2, s2, s3) ; 2: board-truck(driver2, truck1, s3) ; 3: drive-truck(truck1, s3, s1, driver2) ; 4: load-truck(package1, truck1, s1) ; 5: drive-truck(truck1, s1, s3, driver2) ; 6: unload-truck(package1, truck1, s3) ; 7: drive-truck(truck1, s3, s4, driver2) ; 8: load-truck(package3, truck1, s4) ; 9: load-truck... | Does any step in this plan interfere with (taint) the preconditions of the immediately following step? | No | plans | null |
(and (at package1 s2) (at package2 s3) (at package3 s2) (at package4 s1)) | 1: board-truck(driver1, truck1, s1) ; 2: load-truck(package3, truck1, s1) ; 3: drive-truck(truck1, s1, s3, driver1) ; 4: load-truck(package1, truck1, s3) ; 5: drive-truck(truck1, s3, s4, driver1) ; 6: load-truck(package4, truck1, s4) ; 7: drive-truck(truck1, s4, s3, driver1) ; 8: drive-truck(truck1, s3, s1, driver1) ; ... | If Step 5 (drive-truck) were skipped, would Step 6 (load-truck) become invalid? | Yes | plans | null |
(and (at package1 s3) (at package2 s2)) | 1: board-truck(driver2, truck1, s2) ; 2: load-truck(package1, truck1, s2) ; 3: drive-truck(truck1, s2, s3, driver2) ; 4: load-truck(package2, truck1, s3) ; 5: unload-truck(package1, truck1, s3) ; 6: drive-truck(truck1, s3, s2, driver2) ; 7: unload-truck(package2, truck1, s2) | In Step 3 (drive-truck), is the predicate '('driving', 'driver2', 'truck1')' potentially from the effect of Step 1 (board-truck) being used? | Yes | plans | null |
(and (at c0 l3) (at c1 l2) (at c2 l2)) | 1: board(c1, l1) ; 2: sail(l1, l2) ; 3: debark(c1, l2) ; 4: board(c0, l2) ; 5: sail(l2, l3) ; 6: debark(c0, l3) ; 7: board(c2, l3) ; 8: sail(l3, l2) ; 9: debark(c2, l2) | Is the effect '('at-ferry', 'l2')' from Step 2 (sail) still available for Step 3 (debark)? | Yes | plans | null |
(and (on d1 d2) (clear d1) (on d2 peg2) (on d3 peg1) (clear d3) (clear peg3)) | 1: move(d1, peg3, d2) ; 2: move(d3, peg2, peg3) ; 3: move(d1, d2, d3) ; 4: move(d2, peg1, peg2) ; 5: move(d1, d3, d2) ; 6: move(d3, peg3, peg1) | If Step 1 (move) were skipped, would Step 2 (move) become invalid? | Yes | plans | null |
(and (on d1 peg1) (clear d1) (on d2 peg2) (clear d2) (clear peg3)) | 1: move(d2, peg1, peg2) ; 2: move(d1, peg3, peg1) | Based on simple precondition/delete analysis, can Step 2 (move) and Step 1 (move) run concurrently? | Yes | plans | null |
(and (on d1 peg3) (clear d1) (on d2 d3) (clear d2) (on d3 peg1) (clear peg2)) | 1: move(d2, d3, peg2) ; 2: move(d1, peg1, d2) ; 3: move(d3, peg3, peg1) ; 4: move(d1, d2, peg3) ; 5: move(d2, peg2, d3) | Based on immediate dependencies in this linear plan, what constraints determine when Step 3 (move(d3, peg3, peg1)) must occur? | Between Step 2 and Step 4 | plans | null |
(and (at c0 l2) (at c1 l0) (at c2 l2)) | 1: board(c1, l2) ; 2: sail(l2, l0) ; 3: debark(c1, l0) ; 4: board(c0, l0) ; 5: sail(l0, l2) ; 6: debark(c0, l2) ; 7: sail(l2, l3) ; 8: board(c2, l3) ; 9: sail(l3, l2) ; 10: debark(c2, l2) | In Step 3 (debark), is the predicate '('at-ferry', 'l0')' potentially from the effect of Step 2 (sail) being used? | Yes | plans | null |
(and (on d1 d2) (clear d1) (on d2 d3) (on d3 peg1) (clear peg2) (clear peg3)) | 1: move(d1, peg2, d3) ; 2: move(d2, peg1, peg2) ; 3: move(d1, d3, d2) ; 4: move(d3, peg3, peg1) ; 5: move(d1, d2, peg3) ; 6: move(d2, peg2, d3) ; 7: move(d1, peg3, d2) | Is the action in Step 4 (move(d3, peg3, peg1)) 'very busy' in the sense that its effect '('clear', 'peg3')' is used by the next step, Step 5 (move(d1, d2, peg3))? | Yes | plans | null |
(and (at package1 s3) (at package2 s3)) | 1: board-truck(driver1, truck1, s1) ; 2: load-truck(package2, truck1, s1) ; 3: drive-truck(truck1, s1, s3, driver1) ; 4: unload-truck(package2, truck1, s3) ; 5: drive-truck(truck1, s3, s2, driver1) ; 6: load-truck(package1, truck1, s2) ; 7: drive-truck(truck1, s2, s3, driver1) ; 8: unload-truck(package1, truck1, s3) | Based on simple precondition/delete analysis, can Step 7 (drive-truck) and Step 4 (unload-truck) run concurrently? | Yes | plans | null |
(and (at c0 l1) (at c1 l0) (at c2 l0)) | 1: board(c2, l1) ; 2: sail(l1, l0) ; 3: debark(c2, l0) ; 4: sail(l0, l3) ; 5: board(c0, l3) ; 6: sail(l3, l1) ; 7: debark(c0, l1) | In Step 3 (debark), is the predicate '('on', 'c2')' potentially from the effect of Step 1 (board) being used? | Yes | plans | null |
(and (on d1 peg2) (clear d1) (on d2 d3) (clear d2) (on d3 peg1) (clear peg3)) | 1: move(d1, d2, d3) ; 2: move(d2, peg1, peg3) ; 3: move(d1, d3, d2) ; 4: move(d3, peg2, peg1) ; 5: move(d1, d2, peg2) ; 6: move(d2, peg3, d3) | Is the action in Step 4 (move(d3, peg2, peg1)) 'very busy' in the sense that its effect '('clear', 'peg2')' is used by the next step, Step 5 (move(d1, d2, peg2))? | Yes | plans | null |
(and (at package1 s2) (at package2 s3)) | 1: board-truck(driver2, truck2, s3) ; 2: load-truck(package1, truck2, s3) ; 3: drive-truck(truck2, s3, s2, driver2) ; 4: unload-truck(package1, truck2, s2) | Is the effect '('driving', 'driver2', 'truck2')' from Step 1 (board-truck) still available for Step 3 (drive-truck)? | Yes | plans | null |
(and (at package1 s1) (at package2 s2) (at package3 s2) (at package4 s1)) | 1: board-truck(driver2, truck2, s3) ; 2: drive-truck(truck2, s3, s4, driver2) ; 3: load-truck(package3, truck2, s4) ; 4: load-truck(package2, truck2, s4) ; 5: drive-truck(truck2, s4, s2, driver2) ; 6: unload-truck(package3, truck2, s2) ; 7: unload-truck(package2, truck2, s2) | Is the action in Step 5 (drive-truck(truck2, s4, s2, driver2)) 'very busy' in the sense that its effect '('at', 'truck2', 's2')' is used by the next step, Step 6 (unload-truck(package3, truck2, s2))? | Yes | plans | null |
(and (on d1 peg3) (clear d1) (on d2 d3) (clear d2) (on d3 peg2) (clear peg1)) | 1: move(d1, d2, d3) ; 2: move(d2, peg2, peg1) ; 3: move(d1, d3, d2) ; 4: move(d3, peg3, peg2) ; 5: move(d1, d2, peg3) ; 6: move(d2, peg1, d3) | If Step 2 (move) were skipped, would Step 3 (move) become invalid? | No | plans | null |
(and (at c0 l3) (at c1 l1) (at c2 l0)) | 1: sail(l3, l1) ; 2: board(c2, l1) ; 3: sail(l1, l0) ; 4: debark(c2, l0) | Based on immediate dependencies in this linear plan, what constraints determine when Step 4 (debark(c2, l0)) must occur? | After Step 3 | plans | null |
(and (at c0 l0) (at c1 l2) (at c2 l0)) | 1: board(c0, l3) ; 2: sail(l3, l0) ; 3: debark(c0, l0) ; 4: sail(l0, l3) ; 5: board(c2, l3) ; 6: sail(l3, l0) ; 7: debark(c2, l0) | After Step 1 (board), is the effect '('on', 'c0')' 'live' (i.e., needed by a future step like Step 3)? | No | plans | null |
(and (at c0 l0) (at c1 l3) (at c2 l2)) | 1: sail(l3, l2) ; 2: board(c0, l2) ; 3: sail(l2, l0) ; 4: debark(c0, l0) | Is the action in Step 3 (sail(l2, l0)) 'very busy' in the sense that its effect '('at-ferry', 'l0')' is used by the next step, Step 4 (debark(c0, l0))? | Yes | plans | null |
(and (at c0 l0) (at c1 l2) (at c2 l3)) | 1: board(c2, l0) ; 2: sail(l0, l3) ; 3: debark(c2, l3) ; 4: board(c0, l3) ; 5: sail(l3, l0) ; 6: debark(c0, l0) | Does any step in this plan interfere with (taint) the preconditions of the immediately following step? | No | plans | null |
(and (on d1 d2) (clear d1) (on d2 d3) (on d3 peg1) (clear peg2) (clear peg3)) | 1: move(d1, peg1, d2) ; 2: move(d3, peg3, peg1) ; 3: move(d1, d2, peg3) ; 4: move(d2, peg2, d3) ; 5: move(d1, peg3, d2) | In Step 2 (move), is the predicate '('clear', 'peg1')' potentially from the effect of Step 1 (move) being used? | Yes | plans | null |
(and (on d1 peg3) (clear d1) (on d2 peg1) (clear d2) (on d3 peg2) (clear d3)) | 1: move(d1, peg3, d2) ; 2: move(d3, peg1, peg3) ; 3: move(d1, d2, d3) ; 4: move(d2, peg2, peg1) ; 5: move(d1, d3, d2) ; 6: move(d3, peg3, peg2) ; 7: move(d1, d2, peg3) | Based on immediate dependencies in this linear plan, what constraints determine when Step 2 (move(d3, peg1, peg3)) must occur? | Between Step 1 and Step 4 | plans | null |
(and (on d1 d2) (clear d1) (on d2 d3) (on d3 peg2) (clear peg1) (clear peg3)) | 1: move(d1, d2, d3) ; 2: move(d2, peg2, peg3) ; 3: move(d1, d3, d2) ; 4: move(d3, peg1, peg2) ; 5: move(d1, d2, peg1) ; 6: move(d2, peg3, d3) ; 7: move(d1, peg1, d2) | After Step 1 (move), is the effect '('on', 'd1', 'd3')' 'live' (i.e., needed by a future step like Step 3)? | No | plans | null |
(and (at package1 s1) (at package2 s2)) | 1: board-truck(driver1, truck1, s2) ; 2: drive-truck(truck1, s2, s3, driver1) ; 3: load-truck(package1, truck1, s3) ; 4: drive-truck(truck1, s3, s1, driver1) ; 5: load-truck(package2, truck1, s1) ; 6: unload-truck(package1, truck1, s1) ; 7: drive-truck(truck1, s1, s2, driver1) ; 8: unload-truck(package2, truck1, s2) | Based on immediate dependencies in this linear plan, what constraints determine when Step 4 (drive-truck(truck1, s3, s1, driver1)) must occur? | Between Step 2 and Step 5 | plans | null |
(and (on d1 d2) (clear d1) (on d2 peg1) (clear peg2) (clear peg3)) | 1: move(d1, d2, peg3) ; 2: move(d2, peg2, peg1) ; 3: move(d1, peg3, d2) | Based on immediate dependencies in this linear plan, what constraints determine when Step 2 (move(d2, peg2, peg1)) must occur? | After Step 1 | plans | null |
(and (on d1 peg3) (clear d1) (on d2 d3) (clear d2) (on d3 peg1) (clear peg2)) | 1: move(d2, d3, peg2) ; 2: move(d1, peg1, d2) ; 3: move(d3, peg3, peg1) ; 4: move(d1, d2, peg3) ; 5: move(d2, peg2, d3) | Does any step in this plan interfere with (taint) the preconditions of the immediately following step? | No | plans | null |
(and (at c0 l2) (at c1 l3) (at c2 l2)) | 1: board(c1, l2) ; 2: sail(l2, l3) ; 3: debark(c1, l3) ; 4: sail(l3, l1) ; 5: board(c2, l1) ; 6: sail(l1, l2) ; 7: debark(c2, l2) | Is the action in Step 2 (sail(l2, l3)) 'very busy' in the sense that its effect '('at-ferry', 'l3')' is used by the next step, Step 3 (debark(c1, l3))? | Yes | plans | null |
(and (at package1 s2) (at package2 s1) (at package3 s2)) | 1: board-truck(driver1, truck1, s1) ; 2: load-truck(package3, truck1, s1) ; 3: drive-truck(truck1, s1, s2, driver1) ; 4: unload-truck(package3, truck1, s2) | After Step 1 (board-truck), is the effect '('driving', 'driver1', 'truck1')' 'live' (i.e., needed by a future step like Step 3)? | Yes | plans | null |
(and (at c0 l2) (at c1 l0) (at c2 l1)) | 1: board(c2, l3) ; 2: sail(l3, l1) ; 3: debark(c2, l1) ; 4: board(c1, l1) ; 5: sail(l1, l0) ; 6: debark(c1, l0) | In Step 3 (debark), is the predicate '('at-ferry', 'l1')' potentially from the effect of Step 2 (sail) being used? | Yes | plans | null |
(and (at c0 l0) (at c1 l1) (at c2 l2)) | 1: board(c2, l3) ; 2: sail(l3, l2) ; 3: debark(c2, l2) | Does any step in this plan interfere with (taint) the preconditions of the immediately following step? | No | plans | null |
(and (at c0 l0) (at c1 l0) (at c2 l0)) | 1: sail(l2, l1) ; 2: board(c2, l1) ; 3: sail(l1, l0) ; 4: debark(c2, l0) ; 5: sail(l0, l3) ; 6: board(c0, l3) ; 7: sail(l3, l0) ; 8: debark(c0, l0) | After Step 1 (sail), is the effect '('at-ferry', 'l1')' 'live' (i.e., needed by a future step like Step 2)? | Yes | plans | null |
(and (at package1 s4) (at package2 s3) (at package3 s1) (at package4 s3)) | 1: board-truck(driver1, truck1, s2) ; 2: drive-truck(truck1, s2, s1, driver1) ; 3: load-truck(package4, truck1, s1) ; 4: load-truck(package1, truck1, s1) ; 5: drive-truck(truck1, s1, s4, driver1) ; 6: load-truck(package3, truck1, s4) ; 7: load-truck(package2, truck1, s4) ; 8: unload-truck(package1, truck1, s4) ; 9: dri... | Based on immediate dependencies in this linear plan, what constraints determine when Step 12 (unload-truck(package4, truck1, s3)) must occur? | After Step 11 | plans | null |
(and (at c0 l0) (at c1 l0) (at c2 l0)) | 1: board(c2, l3) ; 2: sail(l3, l0) ; 3: debark(c2, l0) ; 4: sail(l0, l1) ; 5: board(c0, l1) ; 6: sail(l1, l0) ; 7: debark(c0, l0) ; 8: sail(l0, l1) ; 9: board(c1, l1) ; 10: sail(l1, l0) ; 11: debark(c1, l0) | Based on immediate dependencies in this linear plan, what constraints determine when Step 4 (sail(l0, l1)) must occur? | Between Step 2 and Step 5 | plans | null |
(and (at c0 l3) (at c1 l1) (at c2 l1)) | 1: board(c2, l3) ; 2: sail(l3, l1) ; 3: debark(c2, l1) ; 4: sail(l1, l2) ; 5: board(c1, l2) ; 6: sail(l2, l1) ; 7: debark(c1, l1) | Does any step in this plan interfere with (taint) the preconditions of the immediately following step? | No | plans | null |
(and (at c0 l3) (at c1 l1) (at c2 l0)) | 1: board(c2, l2) ; 2: sail(l2, l0) ; 3: debark(c2, l0) ; 4: sail(l0, l1) ; 5: board(c0, l1) ; 6: sail(l1, l3) ; 7: debark(c0, l3) ; 8: board(c1, l3) ; 9: sail(l3, l1) ; 10: debark(c1, l1) | Is the action in Step 7 (debark(c0, l3)) 'very busy' in the sense that its effect '('empty-ferry',)' is used by the next step, Step 8 (board(c1, l3))? | Yes | plans | null |
(and (at package1 s4) (at package2 s3) (at package3 s2) (at package4 s2)) | 1: board-truck(driver2, truck3, s3) ; 2: drive-truck(truck3, s3, s1, driver2) ; 3: load-truck(package4, truck3, s1) ; 4: load-truck(package1, truck3, s1) ; 5: drive-truck(truck3, s1, s4, driver2) ; 6: load-truck(package3, truck3, s4) ; 7: load-truck(package2, truck3, s4) ; 8: unload-truck(package1, truck3, s4) ; 9: dri... | After Step 1 (board-truck), is the effect '('driving', 'driver2', 'truck3')' 'live' (i.e., needed by a future step like Step 2)? | Yes | plans | null |
(and (on d1 peg1) (clear d1) (on d2 peg3) (clear d2) (on d3 peg2) (clear d3)) | 1: move(d1, peg1, peg2) ; 2: move(d2, d3, peg1) ; 3: move(d1, peg2, d2) ; 4: move(d3, peg3, peg2) ; 5: move(d1, d2, d3) ; 6: move(d2, peg1, peg3) ; 7: move(d1, d3, peg1) | In Step 2 (move), is the predicate '('clear', 'peg1')' potentially from the effect of Step 1 (move) being used? | Yes | plans | null |
(and (at c0 l0) (at c1 l2) (at c2 l3)) | 1: board(c2, l0) ; 2: sail(l0, l3) ; 3: debark(c2, l3) ; 4: board(c0, l3) ; 5: sail(l3, l0) ; 6: debark(c0, l0) | Is the action in Step 3 (debark(c2, l3)) 'very busy' in the sense that its effect '('empty-ferry',)' is used by the next step, Step 4 (board(c0, l3))? | Yes | plans | null |
(and (at package1 s4) (at package2 s1) (at package3 s3) (at package4 s3)) | 1: board-truck(driver1, truck2, s1) ; 2: load-truck(package4, truck2, s1) ; 3: load-truck(package1, truck2, s1) ; 4: drive-truck(truck2, s1, s4, driver1) ; 5: load-truck(package3, truck2, s4) ; 6: load-truck(package2, truck2, s4) ; 7: unload-truck(package1, truck2, s4) ; 8: drive-truck(truck2, s4, s1, driver1) ; 9: unl... | Is the action in Step 4 (drive-truck(truck2, s1, s4, driver1)) 'very busy' in the sense that its effect '('at', 'truck2', 's4')' is used by the next step, Step 5 (load-truck(package3, truck2, s4))? | Yes | plans | null |
(and (at package1 s2) (at package2 s2) (at package3 s2)) | 1: board-truck(driver1, truck1, s2) ; 2: drive-truck(truck1, s2, s1, driver1) ; 3: load-truck(package3, truck1, s1) ; 4: load-truck(package2, truck1, s1) ; 5: load-truck(package1, truck1, s1) ; 6: drive-truck(truck1, s1, s2, driver1) ; 7: unload-truck(package3, truck1, s2) ; 8: unload-truck(package2, truck1, s2) ; 9: u... | Based on simple precondition/delete analysis, can Step 5 (load-truck) and Step 6 (drive-truck) run concurrently? | No | plans | null |
(and (at c0 l0) (at c1 l0) (at c2 l3)) | 1: sail(l2, l1) ; 2: board(c0, l1) ; 3: sail(l1, l0) ; 4: debark(c0, l0) | Is the effect '('at-ferry', 'l1')' from Step 1 (sail) still available for Step 2 (board)? | Yes | plans | null |
(and (at package1 s3) (at package2 s1) (at package3 s4) (at package4 s1)) | 1: board-truck(driver1, truck1, s2) ; 2: drive-truck(truck1, s2, s3, driver1) ; 3: load-truck(package2, truck1, s3) ; 4: drive-truck(truck1, s3, s4, driver1) ; 5: load-truck(package4, truck1, s4) ; 6: drive-truck(truck1, s4, s1, driver1) ; 7: unload-truck(package4, truck1, s1) ; 8: load-truck(package3, truck1, s1) ; 9:... | In Step 2 (drive-truck), is the predicate '('driving', 'driver1', 'truck1')' potentially from the effect of Step 1 (board-truck) being used? | Yes | plans | null |
(and (on d1 d2) (clear d1) (on d2 peg2) (on d3 peg1) (clear d3) (clear peg3)) | 1: move(d1, d2, d3) ; 2: move(d2, peg1, peg2) ; 3: move(d1, d3, d2) ; 4: move(d3, peg3, peg1) | Is the action in Step 1 (move(d1, d2, d3)) 'very busy' in the sense that its effect '('clear', 'd2')' is used by the next step, Step 2 (move(d2, peg1, peg2))? | Yes | plans | null |
(and (on d1 peg3) (clear d1) (on d2 d3) (clear d2) (on d3 peg1) (clear peg2)) | 1: move(d2, d3, peg2) ; 2: move(d1, peg1, d2) ; 3: move(d3, peg3, peg1) ; 4: move(d1, d2, peg3) ; 5: move(d2, peg2, d3) | Is the action in Step 2 (move(d1, peg1, d2)) 'very busy' in the sense that its effect '('clear', 'peg1')' is used by the next step, Step 3 (move(d3, peg3, peg1))? | Yes | plans | null |
(and (on d1 d2) (clear d1) (on d2 peg2) (on d3 peg1) (clear d3) (clear peg3)) | 1: move(d1, d2, d3) ; 2: move(d2, peg1, peg2) ; 3: move(d1, d3, d2) ; 4: move(d3, peg3, peg1) | If Step 2 (move) were skipped, would Step 3 (move) become invalid? | No | plans | null |
(and (at package1 s3) (at package2 s1)) | 1: board-truck(driver2, truck1, s3) ; 2: drive-truck(truck1, s3, s2, driver2) ; 3: load-truck(package2, truck1, s2) ; 4: drive-truck(truck1, s2, s1, driver2) ; 5: unload-truck(package2, truck1, s1) | Does any step in this plan interfere with (taint) the preconditions of the immediately following step? | No | plans | null |
(and (on d1 d2) (clear d1) (on d2 peg2) (on d3 peg3) (clear d3) (clear peg1)) | 1: move(d2, d3, peg2) ; 2: move(d1, peg3, d2) ; 3: move(d3, peg1, peg3) | In Step 3 (move), is the predicate '('clear', 'peg3')' potentially from the effect of Step 2 (move) being used? | Yes | plans | null |
(and (at package1 s4) (at package2 s1) (at package3 s4) (at package4 s2)) | 1: board-truck(driver2, truck1, s4) ; 2: load-truck(package2, truck1, s4) ; 3: drive-truck(truck1, s4, s1, driver2) ; 4: load-truck(package4, truck1, s1) ; 5: unload-truck(package2, truck1, s1) ; 6: load-truck(package1, truck1, s1) ; 7: drive-truck(truck1, s1, s4, driver2) ; 8: unload-truck(package1, truck1, s4) ; 9: d... | Does any step in this plan interfere with (taint) the preconditions of the immediately following step? | No | plans | null |
(and (on d1 peg2) (clear d1) (on d2 peg1) (clear d2) (on d3 peg3) (clear d3)) | 1: move(d3, peg1, peg3) ; 2: move(d1, d2, d3) ; 3: move(d2, peg2, peg1) ; 4: move(d1, d3, peg2) | After Step 1 (move), is the effect '('clear', 'peg1')' 'live' (i.e., needed by a future step like Step 3)? | No | plans | null |
(and (at package1 s4) (at package2 s3) (at package3 s1) (at package4 s3)) | 1: board-truck(driver1, truck1, s2) ; 2: drive-truck(truck1, s2, s1, driver1) ; 3: load-truck(package4, truck1, s1) ; 4: load-truck(package1, truck1, s1) ; 5: drive-truck(truck1, s1, s4, driver1) ; 6: load-truck(package3, truck1, s4) ; 7: load-truck(package2, truck1, s4) ; 8: unload-truck(package1, truck1, s4) ; 9: dri... | Based on simple precondition/delete analysis, can Step 5 (drive-truck) and Step 10 (unload-truck) run concurrently? | No | plans | null |
(and (at package1 s4) (at package2 s1) (at package3 s3) (at package4 s4)) | 1: board-truck(driver1, truck1, s2) ; 2: drive-truck(truck1, s2, s4, driver1) ; 3: load-truck(package3, truck1, s4) ; 4: load-truck(package2, truck1, s4) ; 5: drive-truck(truck1, s4, s1, driver1) ; 6: load-truck(package4, truck1, s1) ; 7: unload-truck(package2, truck1, s1) ; 8: load-truck(package1, truck1, s1) ; 9: dri... | After Step 1 (board-truck), is the effect '('driving', 'driver1', 'truck1')' 'live' (i.e., needed by a future step like Step 2)? | Yes | plans | null |
(and (at package1 s2) (at package2 s3) (at package3 s2) (at package4 s1)) | 1: board-truck(driver1, truck1, s1) ; 2: load-truck(package3, truck1, s1) ; 3: drive-truck(truck1, s1, s3, driver1) ; 4: load-truck(package1, truck1, s3) ; 5: drive-truck(truck1, s3, s4, driver1) ; 6: load-truck(package4, truck1, s4) ; 7: drive-truck(truck1, s4, s3, driver1) ; 8: drive-truck(truck1, s3, s1, driver1) ; ... | Based on immediate dependencies in this linear plan, what constraints determine when Step 3 (drive-truck(truck1, s1, s3, driver1)) must occur? | Between Step 1 and Step 4 | plans | null |
(and (at c0 l1) (at c1 l1) (at c2 l1)) | 1: sail(l1, l3) ; 2: board(c2, l3) ; 3: sail(l3, l1) ; 4: debark(c2, l1) | Based on immediate dependencies in this linear plan, what constraints determine when Step 3 (sail(l3, l1)) must occur? | Between Step 1 and Step 4 | plans | null |
(and (at c0 l2) (at c1 l0) (at c2 l1)) | 1: board(c1, l3) ; 2: sail(l3, l0) ; 3: debark(c1, l0) | Is the effect '('at-ferry', 'l0')' from Step 2 (sail) still available for Step 3 (debark)? | Yes | plans | null |
(and (at package1 s2) (at package2 s2) (at package3 s1)) | 1: board-truck(driver1, truck1, s2) ; 2: load-truck(package3, truck1, s2) ; 3: drive-truck(truck1, s2, s1, driver1) ; 4: unload-truck(package3, truck1, s1) ; 5: load-truck(package2, truck1, s1) ; 6: load-truck(package1, truck1, s1) ; 7: drive-truck(truck1, s1, s2, driver1) ; 8: unload-truck(package2, truck1, s2) ; 9: u... | Based on immediate dependencies in this linear plan, what constraints determine when Step 3 (drive-truck(truck1, s2, s1, driver1)) must occur? | Between Step 1 and Step 4 | plans | null |
(and (at c0 l0) (at c1 l3) (at c2 l3)) | 1: sail(l1, l2) ; 2: board(c1, l2) ; 3: sail(l2, l3) ; 4: debark(c1, l3) ; 5: sail(l3, l2) ; 6: board(c2, l2) ; 7: sail(l2, l3) ; 8: debark(c2, l3) | Is the effect '('at-ferry', 'l2')' from Step 1 (sail) still available for Step 2 (board)? | Yes | plans | null |
(and (on d1 d2) (clear d1) (on d2 peg1) (on d3 peg2) (clear d3) (clear peg3)) | 1: move(d2, d3, peg1) ; 2: move(d1, peg3, d2) | Based on simple precondition/delete analysis, can Step 1 (move) and Step 2 (move) run concurrently? | No | plans | null |
(and (at c0 l1) (at c1 l3) (at c2 l0)) | 1: sail(l1, l2) ; 2: board(c1, l2) ; 3: sail(l2, l3) ; 4: debark(c1, l3) ; 5: board(c2, l3) ; 6: sail(l3, l0) ; 7: debark(c2, l0) | Does any step in this plan interfere with (taint) the preconditions of the immediately following step? | No | plans | null |
(and (at c0 l0) (at c1 l0) (at c2 l0)) | 1: board(c2, l3) ; 2: sail(l3, l0) ; 3: debark(c2, l0) ; 4: sail(l0, l1) ; 5: board(c0, l1) ; 6: sail(l1, l0) ; 7: debark(c0, l0) ; 8: sail(l0, l1) ; 9: board(c1, l1) ; 10: sail(l1, l0) ; 11: debark(c1, l0) | Based on simple precondition/delete analysis, can Step 11 (debark) and Step 7 (debark) run concurrently? | Yes | plans | null |
(and (at c0 l0) (at c1 l2) (at c2 l3)) | 1: board(c2, l0) ; 2: sail(l0, l3) ; 3: debark(c2, l3) ; 4: board(c0, l3) ; 5: sail(l3, l0) ; 6: debark(c0, l0) | If Step 4 (board) were skipped, would Step 5 (sail) become invalid? | No | plans | null |
(and (at package1 s1) (at package2 s2) (at package3 s2) (at package4 s1)) | 1: board-truck(driver2, truck2, s3) ; 2: drive-truck(truck2, s3, s4, driver2) ; 3: load-truck(package3, truck2, s4) ; 4: load-truck(package2, truck2, s4) ; 5: drive-truck(truck2, s4, s2, driver2) ; 6: unload-truck(package3, truck2, s2) ; 7: unload-truck(package2, truck2, s2) | Based on immediate dependencies in this linear plan, what constraints determine when Step 2 (drive-truck(truck2, s3, s4, driver2)) must occur? | Between Step 1 and Step 3 | plans | null |
(and (on d1 peg1) (clear d1) (on d2 peg2) (clear d2) (clear peg3)) | 1: move(d1, d2, peg1) ; 2: move(d2, peg3, peg2) | Is the effect '('clear', 'd2')' from Step 1 (move) still available for Step 2 (move)? | Yes | plans | null |
(and (at package1 s2) (at package2 s3)) | 1: walk(driver1, s1, s3) ; 2: board-truck(driver1, truck1, s3) ; 3: drive-truck(truck1, s3, s2, driver1) ; 4: load-truck(package2, truck1, s2) ; 5: drive-truck(truck1, s2, s3, driver1) ; 6: unload-truck(package2, truck1, s3) | After Step 1 (walk), is the effect '('at', 'driver1', 's3')' 'live' (i.e., needed by a future step like Step 2)? | No | plans | null |
(and (at c0 l3) (at c1 l3) (at c2 l2)) | 1: board(c0, l2) ; 2: sail(l2, l3) ; 3: debark(c0, l3) ; 4: sail(l3, l1) ; 5: board(c2, l1) ; 6: sail(l1, l2) ; 7: debark(c2, l2) ; 8: board(c1, l2) ; 9: sail(l2, l3) ; 10: debark(c1, l3) | After Step 1 (board), is the effect '('on', 'c0')' 'live' (i.e., needed by a future step like Step 3)? | No | plans | null |
(and (at c0 l3) (at c1 l3) (at c2 l3)) | 1: board(c2, l0) ; 2: sail(l0, l3) ; 3: debark(c2, l3) ; 4: sail(l3, l2) ; 5: board(c1, l2) ; 6: sail(l2, l3) ; 7: debark(c1, l3) | After Step 1 (board), is the effect '('on', 'c2')' 'live' (i.e., needed by a future step like Step 3)? | No | plans | null |
(and (on d1 d2) (clear d1) (on d2 peg1) (on d3 peg2) (clear d3) (clear peg3)) | 1: move(d2, peg2, peg3) ; 2: move(d1, d3, d2) ; 3: move(d3, peg1, peg2) ; 4: move(d1, d2, d3) ; 5: move(d2, peg3, peg1) ; 6: move(d1, d3, d2) | If Step 2 (move) were skipped, would Step 3 (move) become invalid? | Yes | plans | null |
(and (at c0 l1) (at c1 l1) (at c2 l2)) | 1: sail(l3, l0) ; 2: board(c0, l0) ; 3: sail(l0, l1) ; 4: debark(c0, l1) ; 5: sail(l1, l0) ; 6: board(c1, l0) ; 7: sail(l0, l1) ; 8: debark(c1, l1) | If Step 4 (debark) were skipped, would Step 5 (sail) become invalid? | No | plans | null |
(and (on d1 peg3) (clear d1) (on d2 d3) (clear d2) (on d3 peg2) (clear peg1)) | 1: move(d1, d2, d3) ; 2: move(d2, peg2, peg1) ; 3: move(d1, d3, d2) ; 4: move(d3, peg3, peg2) ; 5: move(d1, d2, peg3) ; 6: move(d2, peg1, d3) | Based on immediate dependencies in this linear plan, what constraints determine when Step 6 (move(d2, peg1, d3)) must occur? | After Step 5 | plans | null |
(and (on d1 d3) (clear d1) (on d2 peg3) (clear d2) (on d3 peg2) (clear peg1)) | 1: move(d1, peg1, d3) ; 2: move(d2, peg2, peg1) ; 3: move(d1, d3, d2) ; 4: move(d3, peg3, peg2) ; 5: move(d1, d2, d3) ; 6: move(d2, peg1, peg3) | Is the effect '('clear', 'peg1')' from Step 1 (move) still available for Step 2 (move)? | Yes | plans | null |
(and (at c0 l3) (at c1 l1) (at c2 l0)) | 1: sail(l2, l1) ; 2: board(c0, l1) ; 3: sail(l1, l3) ; 4: debark(c0, l3) ; 5: board(c1, l3) ; 6: sail(l3, l1) ; 7: debark(c1, l1) ; 8: board(c2, l1) ; 9: sail(l1, l0) ; 10: debark(c2, l0) | After Step 1 (sail), is the effect '('at-ferry', 'l1')' 'live' (i.e., needed by a future step like Step 2)? | Yes | plans | null |
(and (on d1 d2) (clear d1) (on d2 peg1) (on d3 peg3) (clear d3) (clear peg2)) | 1: move(d2, peg3, peg2) ; 2: move(d1, d3, d2) ; 3: move(d3, peg1, peg3) ; 4: move(d1, d2, d3) ; 5: move(d2, peg2, peg1) ; 6: move(d1, d3, d2) | In Step 3 (move), is the predicate '('clear', 'peg3')' potentially from the effect of Step 1 (move) being used? | Yes | plans | null |
(and (at package1 s4) (at package2 s3) (at package3 s4) (at package4 s3)) | 1: board-truck(driver1, truck2, s3) ; 2: drive-truck(truck2, s3, s1, driver1) ; 3: load-truck(package4, truck2, s1) ; 4: load-truck(package1, truck2, s1) ; 5: drive-truck(truck2, s1, s3, driver1) ; 6: unload-truck(package4, truck2, s3) ; 7: drive-truck(truck2, s3, s4, driver1) ; 8: load-truck(package2, truck2, s4) ; 9:... | Is the effect '('driving', 'driver1', 'truck2')' from Step 1 (board-truck) still available for Step 2 (drive-truck)? | Yes | plans | null |
(and (on d1 d2) (clear d1) (on d2 peg1) (clear peg2) (clear peg3)) | 1: move(d1, d2, peg3) ; 2: move(d2, peg2, peg1) ; 3: move(d1, peg3, d2) | Is the action in Step 1 (move(d1, d2, peg3)) 'very busy' in the sense that its effect '('clear', 'd2')' is used by the next step, Step 2 (move(d2, peg2, peg1))? | Yes | plans | null |
(and (at package1 s2) (at package2 s4) (at package3 s2) (at package4 s2)) | 1: board-truck(driver1, truck1, s1) ; 2: load-truck(package4, truck1, s1) ; 3: load-truck(package1, truck1, s1) ; 4: drive-truck(truck1, s1, s4, driver1) ; 5: load-truck(package3, truck1, s4) ; 6: drive-truck(truck1, s4, s2, driver1) ; 7: unload-truck(package4, truck1, s2) ; 8: unload-truck(package3, truck1, s2) ; 9: u... | If Step 8 (unload-truck) were skipped, would Step 9 (unload-truck) become invalid? | No | plans | null |
(and (at c0 l3) (at c1 l2) (at c2 l0)) | 1: sail(l2, l3) ; 2: board(c1, l3) ; 3: sail(l3, l2) ; 4: debark(c1, l2) | After Step 1 (sail), is the effect '('at-ferry', 'l3')' 'live' (i.e., needed by a future step like Step 2)? | Yes | plans | null |
(and (at package1 s2) (at package2 s2) (at package3 s2)) | 1: board-truck(driver1, truck1, s2) ; 2: drive-truck(truck1, s2, s1, driver1) ; 3: load-truck(package3, truck1, s1) ; 4: load-truck(package2, truck1, s1) ; 5: load-truck(package1, truck1, s1) ; 6: drive-truck(truck1, s1, s2, driver1) ; 7: unload-truck(package3, truck1, s2) ; 8: unload-truck(package2, truck1, s2) ; 9: u... | Is the action in Step 2 (drive-truck(truck1, s2, s1, driver1)) 'very busy' in the sense that its effect '('at', 'truck1', 's1')' is used by the next step, Step 3 (load-truck(package3, truck1, s1))? | Yes | plans | null |
(and (on d1 peg1) (clear d1) (on d2 d3) (clear d2) (on d3 peg3) (clear peg2)) | 1: move(d1, d3, peg1) ; 2: move(d2, peg2, d3) | Based on simple precondition/delete analysis, can Step 2 (move) and Step 1 (move) run concurrently? | Yes | plans | null |
(and (at package1 s2) (at package2 s4) (at package3 s1) (at package4 s2)) | 1: board-truck(driver1, truck3, s3) ; 2: drive-truck(truck3, s3, s4, driver1) ; 3: load-truck(package3, truck3, s4) ; 4: drive-truck(truck3, s4, s1, driver1) ; 5: load-truck(package4, truck3, s1) ; 6: unload-truck(package3, truck3, s1) ; 7: load-truck(package1, truck3, s1) ; 8: drive-truck(truck3, s1, s2, driver1) ; 9:... | Is the action in Step 8 (drive-truck(truck3, s1, s2, driver1)) 'very busy' in the sense that its effect '('at', 'truck3', 's2')' is used by the next step, Step 9 (unload-truck(package4, truck3, s2))? | Yes | plans | null |
(and (at c0 l0) (at c1 l0) (at c2 l0)) | 1: sail(l2, l1) ; 2: board(c2, l1) ; 3: sail(l1, l0) ; 4: debark(c2, l0) ; 5: sail(l0, l3) ; 6: board(c0, l3) ; 7: sail(l3, l0) ; 8: debark(c0, l0) | Is the effect '('at-ferry', 'l1')' from Step 1 (sail) still available for Step 2 (board)? | Yes | plans | null |
(and (at c0 l0) (at c1 l3) (at c2 l1)) | 1: board(c2, l3) ; 2: sail(l3, l1) ; 3: debark(c2, l1) ; 4: board(c1, l1) ; 5: sail(l1, l3) ; 6: debark(c1, l3) ; 7: sail(l3, l2) ; 8: board(c0, l2) ; 9: sail(l2, l0) ; 10: debark(c0, l0) | If Step 2 (sail) were skipped, would Step 3 (debark) become invalid? | Yes | plans | null |
(and (at c0 l0) (at c1 l0) (at c2 l3)) | 1: board(c1, l1) ; 2: sail(l1, l0) ; 3: debark(c1, l0) | In Step 3 (debark), is the predicate '('at-ferry', 'l0')' potentially from the effect of Step 2 (sail) being used? | Yes | plans | null |
(and (at c0 l0) (at c1 l3) (at c2 l1)) | 1: board(c2, l3) ; 2: sail(l3, l1) ; 3: debark(c2, l1) ; 4: board(c1, l1) ; 5: sail(l1, l3) ; 6: debark(c1, l3) ; 7: sail(l3, l2) ; 8: board(c0, l2) ; 9: sail(l2, l0) ; 10: debark(c0, l0) | Based on simple precondition/delete analysis, can Step 7 (sail) and Step 5 (sail) run concurrently? | Yes | plans | null |
(and (at c0 l2) (at c1 l0) (at c2 l3)) | 1: board(c1, l2) ; 2: sail(l2, l0) ; 3: debark(c1, l0) ; 4: board(c0, l0) ; 5: sail(l0, l2) ; 6: debark(c0, l2) ; 7: sail(l2, l0) ; 8: board(c2, l0) ; 9: sail(l0, l3) ; 10: debark(c2, l3) | Based on immediate dependencies in this linear plan, what constraints determine when Step 9 (sail(l0, l3)) must occur? | Between Step 7 and Step 10 | plans | null |
(and (at c0 l2) (at c1 l0) (at c2 l1)) | 1: sail(l0, l2) ; 2: board(c2, l2) ; 3: sail(l2, l1) ; 4: debark(c2, l1) ; 5: sail(l1, l3) ; 6: board(c1, l3) ; 7: sail(l3, l0) ; 8: debark(c1, l0) | Does any step in this plan interfere with (taint) the preconditions of the immediately following step? | No | plans | null |
(and (on d1 peg2) (clear d1) (on d2 peg1) (clear d2) (on d3 peg3) (clear d3)) | 1: move(d3, peg1, peg3) ; 2: move(d1, d2, d3) ; 3: move(d2, peg2, peg1) ; 4: move(d1, d3, peg2) | Is the effect '('clear', 'peg1')' from Step 1 (move) still available for Step 3 (move)? | Yes | plans | null |
(and (at package1 s2) (at package2 s4) (at package3 s1) (at package4 s2)) | 1: board-truck(driver1, truck3, s3) ; 2: drive-truck(truck3, s3, s4, driver1) ; 3: load-truck(package3, truck3, s4) ; 4: drive-truck(truck3, s4, s1, driver1) ; 5: load-truck(package4, truck3, s1) ; 6: unload-truck(package3, truck3, s1) ; 7: load-truck(package1, truck3, s1) ; 8: drive-truck(truck3, s1, s2, driver1) ; 9:... | Based on immediate dependencies in this linear plan, what constraints determine when Step 9 (unload-truck(package4, truck3, s2)) must occur? | After Step 8 | plans | null |
(and (on d1 d3) (clear d1) (on d2 peg2) (clear d2) (on d3 peg1) (clear peg3)) | 1: move(d2, peg1, peg3) ; 2: move(d1, d3, d2) ; 3: move(d3, peg2, peg1) ; 4: move(d1, d2, d3) ; 5: move(d2, peg3, peg2) | Does any step in this plan interfere with (taint) the preconditions of the immediately following step? | No | plans | null |
(and (on d1 d2) (clear d1) (on d2 peg1) (on d3 peg2) (clear d3) (clear peg3)) | 1: move(d1, d3, d2) ; 2: move(d3, peg1, peg2) ; 3: move(d1, d2, d3) ; 4: move(d2, peg3, peg1) ; 5: move(d1, d3, d2) | Is the action in Step 1 (move(d1, d3, d2)) 'very busy' in the sense that its effect '('clear', 'd3')' is used by the next step, Step 2 (move(d3, peg1, peg2))? | Yes | plans | null |
(and (at c0 l3) (at c1 l0) (at c2 l1)) | 1: sail(l0, l2) ; 2: board(c0, l2) ; 3: sail(l2, l3) ; 4: debark(c0, l3) ; 5: board(c2, l3) ; 6: sail(l3, l1) ; 7: debark(c2, l1) | Based on simple precondition/delete analysis, can Step 1 (sail) and Step 5 (board) run concurrently? | Yes | plans | null |
(and (on d1 d3) (clear d1) (on d2 peg2) (clear d2) (on d3 peg3) (clear peg1)) | 1: move(d1, d2, peg3) ; 2: move(d2, d3, peg2) ; 3: move(d1, peg3, d2) ; 4: move(d3, peg1, peg3) ; 5: move(d1, d2, d3) | In Step 2 (move), is the predicate '('clear', 'd2')' potentially from the effect of Step 1 (move) being used? | Yes | plans | null |
(and (on d1 peg3) (clear d1) (on d2 peg1) (clear d2) (on d3 peg2) (clear d3)) | 1: move(d3, peg1, peg3) ; 2: move(d1, d2, d3) ; 3: move(d2, peg2, peg1) ; 4: move(d1, d3, d2) ; 5: move(d3, peg3, peg2) ; 6: move(d1, d2, peg3) | Is the effect '('clear', 'peg1')' from Step 1 (move) still available for Step 3 (move)? | Yes | plans | null |
(and (at package1 s1) (at package2 s2) (at package3 s2) (at package4 s3)) | 1: board-truck(driver1, truck1, s4) ; 2: load-truck(package3, truck1, s4) ; 3: load-truck(package2, truck1, s4) ; 4: drive-truck(truck1, s4, s1, driver1) ; 5: load-truck(package4, truck1, s1) ; 6: drive-truck(truck1, s1, s3, driver1) ; 7: unload-truck(package4, truck1, s3) ; 8: drive-truck(truck1, s3, s2, driver1) ; 9:... | After Step 1 (board-truck), is the effect '('driving', 'driver1', 'truck1')' 'live' (i.e., needed by a future step like Step 4)? | Yes | plans | null |
(and (at package1 s1) (at package2 s3) (at package3 s2) (at package4 s4)) | 1: board-truck(driver1, truck2, s3) ; 2: drive-truck(truck2, s3, s1, driver1) ; 3: load-truck(package4, truck2, s1) ; 4: drive-truck(truck2, s1, s4, driver1) ; 5: unload-truck(package4, truck2, s4) ; 6: load-truck(package3, truck2, s4) ; 7: load-truck(package2, truck2, s4) ; 8: drive-truck(truck2, s4, s2, driver1) ; 9:... | Does any step in this plan interfere with (taint) the preconditions of the immediately following step? | No | plans | null |
(and (at c0 l1) (at c1 l1) (at c2 l2)) | 1: sail(l3, l0) ; 2: board(c0, l0) ; 3: sail(l0, l1) ; 4: debark(c0, l1) ; 5: sail(l1, l0) ; 6: board(c1, l0) ; 7: sail(l0, l1) ; 8: debark(c1, l1) | Is the action in Step 3 (sail(l0, l1)) 'very busy' in the sense that its effect '('at-ferry', 'l1')' is used by the next step, Step 4 (debark(c0, l1))? | Yes | plans | null |
(and (on d1 d2) (clear d1) (on d2 d3) (on d3 peg1) (clear peg2) (clear peg3)) | 1: move(d1, d3, peg3) ; 2: move(d2, peg2, d3) ; 3: move(d1, peg3, d2) | Does any step in this plan interfere with (taint) the preconditions of the immediately following step? | No | plans | null |
(and (at package1 s1) (at package2 s3)) | 1: board-truck(driver1, truck1, s1) ; 2: load-truck(package2, truck1, s1) ; 3: drive-truck(truck1, s1, s2, driver1) ; 4: load-truck(package1, truck1, s2) ; 5: drive-truck(truck1, s2, s1, driver1) ; 6: unload-truck(package1, truck1, s1) ; 7: drive-truck(truck1, s1, s2, driver1) ; 8: drive-truck(truck1, s2, s3, driver1) ... | Does any step in this plan interfere with (taint) the preconditions of the immediately following step? | No | plans | null |
(and (at package1 s2) (at package2 s2) (at package3 s4) (at package4 s4)) | 1: board-truck(driver2, truck2, s3) ; 2: drive-truck(truck2, s3, s4, driver2) ; 3: load-truck(package2, truck2, s4) ; 4: drive-truck(truck2, s4, s1, driver2) ; 5: load-truck(package4, truck2, s1) ; 6: load-truck(package1, truck2, s1) ; 7: drive-truck(truck2, s1, s2, driver2) ; 8: unload-truck(package2, truck2, s2) ; 9:... | Is the effect '('driving', 'driver2', 'truck2')' from Step 1 (board-truck) still available for Step 2 (drive-truck)? | Yes | plans | null |
(and (at package1 s2) (at package2 s2)) | 1: board-truck(driver2, truck1, s2) ; 2: drive-truck(truck1, s2, s1, driver2) ; 3: load-truck(package2, truck1, s1) ; 4: drive-truck(truck1, s1, s2, driver2) ; 5: unload-truck(package2, truck1, s2) ; 6: drive-truck(truck1, s2, s3, driver2) ; 7: load-truck(package1, truck1, s3) ; 8: drive-truck(truck1, s3, s2, driver2) ... | In Step 2 (drive-truck), is the predicate '('driving', 'driver2', 'truck1')' potentially from the effect of Step 1 (board-truck) being used? | Yes | plans | null |
(and (at c0 l1) (at c1 l0) (at c2 l2)) | 1: sail(l1, l3) ; 2: board(c1, l3) ; 3: sail(l3, l0) ; 4: debark(c1, l0) ; 5: board(c2, l0) ; 6: sail(l0, l2) ; 7: debark(c2, l2) ; 8: board(c0, l2) ; 9: sail(l2, l1) ; 10: debark(c0, l1) | Is the effect '('at-ferry', 'l3')' from Step 1 (sail) still available for Step 2 (board)? | Yes | plans | null |
(and (at c0 l2) (at c1 l1) (at c2 l3)) | 1: sail(l0, l2) ; 2: board(c1, l2) ; 3: sail(l2, l1) ; 4: debark(c1, l1) | Does any step in this plan interfere with (taint) the preconditions of the immediately following step? | No | plans | null |
(and (at package1 s4) (at package2 s3) (at package3 s3) (at package4 s4)) | 1: board-truck(driver2, truck3, s1) ; 2: load-truck(package4, truck3, s1) ; 3: load-truck(package1, truck3, s1) ; 4: drive-truck(truck3, s1, s4, driver2) ; 5: unload-truck(package4, truck3, s4) ; 6: load-truck(package3, truck3, s4) ; 7: load-truck(package2, truck3, s4) ; 8: unload-truck(package1, truck3, s4) ; 9: drive... | If Step 6 (load-truck) were skipped, would Step 7 (load-truck) become invalid? | No | plans | null |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.