data_source stringclasses 1
value | prompt stringlengths 424 244k | ability stringclasses 1
value | reward_model dict | extra_info dict |
|---|---|---|---|---|
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
[RoG Reasoning Pa... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 0,
"ground_truth": "jaxon bieber",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
[RoG Reasoning Pa... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 1,
"ground_truth": "padmé amidala",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
[RoG Reasoning Pa... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 2,
"ground_truth": "bahamas",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
[RoG Reasoning Pa... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 3,
"ground_truth": "bahamian dollar",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
[RoG Reasoning Pa... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 4,
"ground_truth": "denethor ii",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
[RoG Reasoning Pa... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 5,
"ground_truth": "chicago bulls",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
[RoG Reasoning Pa... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 6,
"ground_truth": "washington, d.c.",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
[RoG Reasoning Pa... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 7,
"ground_truth": "sittwe",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
[RoG Reasoning Pa... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 8,
"ground_truth": "astoria greengrass",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
[RoG Reasoning Pa... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 9,
"ground_truth": "mexico|canada",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
[RoG Reasoning Pa... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 10,
"ground_truth": "italy|lazio|province of rome",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
[RoG Reasoning Pa... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 11,
"ground_truth": "joseph p. kennedy, jr.",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
[RoG Reasoning Pa... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 12,
"ground_truth": "garde conjointe|ramona and her mother (ramona quimby)|dear mr. henshaw|fifteen|ramona the pest|two times the fun|the mouse and the motorcycle|ramona and her mother|ellen tebbits|ramona and her mother|beezus and ramona|ellen tebbits|beezus and ramona.|henry huggins (henry huggins ... |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
[RoG Reasoning Pa... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 13,
"ground_truth": "ngurah rai international airport",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
[RoG Reasoning Pa... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 14,
"ground_truth": "hailemariam desalegn",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
[RoG Reasoning Pa... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 15,
"ground_truth": "bell rock|sycamore canyon|slide rock state park|sedona airport|seven canyons|cathedral rock|sedona international film festival|oak creek canyon|chapel of the holy cross|red rock state park|honanki",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
[RoG Reasoning Pa... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 16,
"ground_truth": "hot springs high school",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
[RoG Reasoning Pa... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 17,
"ground_truth": "semi-presidential system|federal republic|constitutional republic",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
[RoG Reasoning Pa... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 18,
"ground_truth": "field of dreams 2: lockout|the twilight saga: breaking dawn - part 1|grown ups 2|the twilight saga: breaking dawn - part 2|abduction|valentine's day|the nick and jessica variety hour|northern lights|tracers|shadow fury|the adventures of sharkboy and lavagirl|he's a bully, charlie... |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
[RoG Reasoning Pa... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 19,
"ground_truth": "2003–04 nba season",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
[RoG Reasoning Pa... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 20,
"ground_truth": "anne boleyn|catherine howard",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
[RoG Reasoning Pa... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 21,
"ground_truth": "hagar",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
[RoG Reasoning Pa... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 22,
"ground_truth": "black liberation|african americans' rights",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
[RoG Reasoning Pa... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 23,
"ground_truth": "kingdom of the netherlands",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
[RoG Reasoning Pa... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 25,
"ground_truth": "paris",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
[RoG Reasoning Pa... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 26,
"ground_truth": "susa",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
[RoG Reasoning Pa... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 27,
"ground_truth": "ice hockey",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
[RoG Reasoning Pa... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 28,
"ground_truth": "st. nicholas of myra, bari and manhattan: biography of a legend",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
[RoG Reasoning Pa... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 29,
"ground_truth": "chaz bono|elijah blue allman",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
[RoG Reasoning Pa... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 30,
"ground_truth": "jacksonian democratic party|democratic party|democratic-republican party",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
[RoG Reasoning Pa... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 31,
"ground_truth": "harry potter and the philosopher's stone",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
[RoG Reasoning Pa... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 32,
"ground_truth": "author|actor|playwright|lyricist|poet",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
[RoG Reasoning Pa... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 33,
"ground_truth": "the forger|the hunger games: mockingjay, part 2|american splendor|7 days in havana|detention|the hunger games: catching fire|house blend|one last ride|rv|journey to the center of the earth|zathura|the third rule|the hunger games: mockingjay, part 1|wilder days|journey 2: the myst... |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
[RoG Reasoning Pa... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 34,
"ground_truth": "at&t park",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
[RoG Reasoning Pa... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 35,
"ground_truth": "1908 democratic national convention|1896 democratic national convention|1900 democratic national convention",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
[RoG Reasoning Pa... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 36,
"ground_truth": "the frederick douglass papers, series 1, vol. 5: 1881-95|life and times of frederick douglass|my bondage and my freedom|two slave rebellions at sea|the frederick douglass papers, series 2, vol. 3: life and times|escape from slavery|words of ages|a black diplomat in haiti|why i be... |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
[RoG Reasoning Pa... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 37,
"ground_truth": "prince edward, duke of kent and strathearn|princess victoria of saxe-coburg-saalfeld",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
[RoG Reasoning Pa... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 38,
"ground_truth": "places in the heart|norma rae",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
[RoG Reasoning Pa... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 39,
"ground_truth": "a study in scarlet",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
[RoG Reasoning Pa... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 40,
"ground_truth": "equatorial guinea|south africa|canada|guinea-bissau|andorra|mozambique|brazil|cape verde|angola|portugal|china|guyana|macau|timor-leste",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
[RoG Reasoning Pa... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 41,
"ground_truth": "diane disney miller|sharon mae disney",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
[RoG Reasoning Pa... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 42,
"ground_truth": "dave parsons|sacha gervasi|chris traynor|gavin rossdale|nigel pulsford|robin goodridge|sacha puttnam|spencer cobrin|amir|corey britz",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
[RoG Reasoning Pa... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 43,
"ground_truth": "bishop",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
[RoG Reasoning Pa... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 44,
"ground_truth": "christmas island time zone|australian western time zone|central western time zone|casey time zone|mawson station time zone|cocos islands time zone|australian eastern time zone|davis time zone|norfolk time zone|australian central time zone|lord howe time zone|heard and mcdonald is... |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
[RoG Reasoning Pa... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 45,
"ground_truth": "kim",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
[RoG Reasoning Pa... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 46,
"ground_truth": "swing music|scat singing|jazz|traditional pop music|dixieland",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
[RoG Reasoning Pa... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 47,
"ground_truth": "run of the house|gimme a break!|blossom|brotherly love|melissa & joey|bow",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
[RoG Reasoning Pa... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 48,
"ground_truth": "mountain time zone",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
[RoG Reasoning Pa... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 49,
"ground_truth": "david silver",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
[RoG Reasoning Pa... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 50,
"ground_truth": "sydney",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
[GNN Reasoning Pa... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 51,
"ground_truth": "2007 world series",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
[RoG Reasoning Pa... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 52,
"ground_truth": "ohio university",
"split": "train"
} |
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio
YAML Metadata Warning:empty or missing yaml metadata in repo card
Check out the documentation for more information.
- Downloads last month
- 4