data_source stringclasses 1
value | prompt stringlengths 387 3.36k | ability stringclasses 1
value | reward_model dict | extra_info dict |
|---|---|---|---|---|
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Justin Bieber -> ... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 0,
"ground_truth": "jaxon bieber",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Natalie Portman -... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 1,
"ground_truth": "padmé amidala",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Grand Bahama -> l... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 2,
"ground_truth": "bahamas",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Bahamas -> financ... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 3,
"ground_truth": "bahamian dollar",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Joakim Noah -> ba... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 5,
"ground_truth": "chicago bulls",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Washington Redski... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 6,
"ground_truth": "washington, d.c.",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Saki -> people.pe... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 7,
"ground_truth": "sittwe",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Draco Malfoy -> f... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 8,
"ground_truth": "astoria greengrass",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
United States of ... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 9,
"ground_truth": "mexico|canada",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Rome -> location.... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 10,
"ground_truth": "italy|lazio|province of rome",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
John F. Kennedy -... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 11,
"ground_truth": "joseph p. kennedy, jr.",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Beverly Cleary ->... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 12,
"ground_truth": "garde conjointe|ramona and her mother (ramona quimby)|dear mr. henshaw|fifteen|ramona the pest|two times the fun|the mouse and the motorcycle|ramona and her mother|ellen tebbits|ramona and her mother|beezus and ramona|ellen tebbits|beezus and ramona.|henry huggins (henry huggins ... |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Bali -> location.... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 13,
"ground_truth": "ngurah rai international airport",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Ethiopia -> peopl... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 14,
"ground_truth": "hailemariam desalegn",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Sedona -> travel.... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 15,
"ground_truth": "bell rock|sycamore canyon|slide rock state park|sedona airport|seven canyons|cathedral rock|sedona international film festival|oak creek canyon|chapel of the holy cross|red rock state park|honanki",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Bill Clinton -> e... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 16,
"ground_truth": "hot springs high school",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Russia -> locatio... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 17,
"ground_truth": "semi-presidential system|federal republic|constitutional republic",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Taylor Lautner ->... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 18,
"ground_truth": "field of dreams 2: lockout|the twilight saga: breaking dawn - part 1|grown ups 2|the twilight saga: breaking dawn - part 2|abduction|valentine's day|the nick and jessica variety hour|northern lights|tracers|shadow fury|the adventures of sharkboy and lavagirl|he's a bully, charlie... |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
LeBron James -> b... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 19,
"ground_truth": "2003–04 nba season",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Henry VIII of Eng... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 20,
"ground_truth": "anne boleyn|catherine howard",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Ishmael -> people... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 21,
"ground_truth": "hagar",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Malcolm X -> base... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 22,
"ground_truth": "black liberation|african americans' rights",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Netherlands -> ba... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 23,
"ground_truth": "kingdom of the netherlands",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
France -> locatio... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 25,
"ground_truth": "paris",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Esther -> people.... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 26,
"ground_truth": "susa",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Saint Nicholas ->... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 28,
"ground_truth": "st. nicholas of myra, bari and manhattan: biography of a legend",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Cher -> people.pe... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 29,
"ground_truth": "chaz bono|elijah blue allman",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Andrew Jackson ->... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 30,
"ground_truth": "jacksonian democratic party|democratic party|democratic-republican party",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Harry Potter lite... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 31,
"ground_truth": "harry potter and the philosopher's stone",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
William Shakespea... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 32,
"ground_truth": "author|actor|playwright|lyricist|poet",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Josh Hutchersonm ... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 33,
"ground_truth": "the forger|the hunger games: mockingjay, part 2|american splendor|7 days in havana|detention|the hunger games: catching fire|house blend|one last ride|rv|journey to the center of the earth|zathura|the third rule|the hunger games: mockingjay, part 1|wilder days|journey 2: the myst... |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
San Francisco Gia... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 34,
"ground_truth": "at&t park",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
William Jennings ... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 35,
"ground_truth": "1908 democratic national convention|1896 democratic national convention|1900 democratic national convention",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Frederick Douglas... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 36,
"ground_truth": "the frederick douglass papers, series 1, vol. 5: 1881-95|life and times of frederick douglass|my bondage and my freedom|two slave rebellions at sea|the frederick douglass papers, series 2, vol. 3: life and times|escape from slavery|words of ages|a black diplomat in haiti|why i be... |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Queen Victoria ->... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 37,
"ground_truth": "prince edward, duke of kent and strathearn|princess victoria of saxe-coburg-saalfeld",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Sally Field -> aw... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 38,
"ground_truth": "places in the heart|norma rae",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Sherlock Holmes -... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 39,
"ground_truth": "a study in scarlet",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Portuguese Langua... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 40,
"ground_truth": "equatorial guinea|south africa|canada|guinea-bissau|andorra|mozambique|brazil|cape verde|angola|portugal|china|guyana|macau|timor-leste",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Walt Disney -> pe... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 41,
"ground_truth": "diane disney miller|sharon mae disney",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Bush -> music.mus... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 42,
"ground_truth": "dave parsons|sacha gervasi|chris traynor|gavin rossdale|nigel pulsford|robin goodridge|sacha puttnam|spencer cobrin|amir|corey britz",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Tupac Shakur -> c... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 43,
"ground_truth": "bishop",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Australia -> loca... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 44,
"ground_truth": "christmas island time zone|australian western time zone|central western time zone|casey time zone|mawson station time zone|cocos islands time zone|australian eastern time zone|davis time zone|norfolk time zone|australian central time zone|lord howe time zone|heard and mcdonald is... |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Louis Armstrong -... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 46,
"ground_truth": "swing music|scat singing|jazz|traditional pop music|dixieland",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Joey Lawrence -> ... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 47,
"ground_truth": "run of the house|gimme a break!|blossom|brotherly love|melissa & joey|bow",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Denver -> locatio... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 48,
"ground_truth": "mountain time zone",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Beverly Hills, 90... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 49,
"ground_truth": "david silver",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Jackie French -> ... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 50,
"ground_truth": "sydney",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
World Series -> s... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 51,
"ground_truth": "2007 world series",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Matt Lauer -> peo... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 52,
"ground_truth": "ohio university",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
London -> travel.... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 53,
"ground_truth": "whetstone, london|london zoo|national maritime museum|london palladium|apsley house|london marathon|polish institute and sikorski museum|barbican centre|g-a-y|madame tussauds london|chessington world of adventures|hippodrome, london|jewish museum london|science museum, london|lon... |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Joan Mir -> peopl... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 54,
"ground_truth": "cercle artístic de sant lluc",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Vincent van Gogh ... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 55,
"ground_truth": "anton mauve|fernand cormon|rembrandt|claude monet|jozef israëls|willem roelofs|jean-françois millet|peter paul rubens|eugène delacroix|paul cézanne",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
New York Knicks -... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 56,
"ground_truth": "1970 nba finals|1973 nba finals",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Jack Daniel's -> ... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 57,
"ground_truth": "tennessee",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Pakistan -> langu... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 58,
"ground_truth": "urdu language|english language",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Santa Clara Unive... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 59,
"ground_truth": "santa clara|united states of america|california",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Timothy McVeigh -... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 60,
"ground_truth": "adx florence",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Yangtze -> geogra... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 61,
"ground_truth": "east china sea",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Miley Cyrus -> fr... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 62,
"ground_truth": "liam hemsworth",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Jamaica -> financ... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 63,
"ground_truth": "jamaican dollar",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Robert Downey Jr.... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 64,
"ground_truth": "susan downey",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
New York Rangers ... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 65,
"ground_truth": "madison square garden",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Jefferson Davis -... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 66,
"ground_truth": "hollywood cemetery",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Dallas Cowboys ->... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 68,
"ground_truth": "super bowl xxx|super bowl xxvii|super bowl xxviii|super bowl vi|super bowl xii",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Louis Sachar -> a... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 69,
"ground_truth": "dorothy canfield fisher children's book award|national book award for young people's literature|john newbery medal|anne v. zarrow award for young readers' literature",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Missouri -> locat... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 70,
"ground_truth": "charles d. drake|daniel t. jewett|john danforth|david h. armstrong|waldo p. johnson|john b. henderson|claire mccaskill|john ashcroft|david barton|forrest c. donnell|george graham vest|stuart symington|alexander buckner|james shields|george howard williams|james a. reed|frank p. b... |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Egypt -> location... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 71,
"ground_truth": "egyptian pound",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
United States Nav... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 72,
"ground_truth": "aeromarine 40|felixstowe f.2|curtiss model h|martin t4m|boeing insitu scaneagle|vought o2u corsair|northrop grumman ea-6b prowler|north american aj savage|d-class blimp|grumman f2f|beechcraft t-34 mentor|mcdonnell douglas f/a-18 hornet|timm n2t tutor|boeing xf8b|northrop bt|grumm... |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Israel -> languag... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 74,
"ground_truth": "lojban|ladino language|yiddish language|hebrew language|english language|arabic language",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
United States Air... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 75,
"ground_truth": "colorado springs",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Puerto Rico -> sp... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 76,
"ground_truth": "puerto rico national football team|capitanes de arecibo|puerto rico men's national volleyball team|puerto rico women's national volleyball team",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Russia -> locatio... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 77,
"ground_truth": "islam|russian orthodox church",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Shawnee Smith -> ... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 78,
"ground_truth": "the blob|saw iii|the stand|jayne mansfield's car|something borrowed, something blue|the low life|the almost guys|the island|annie|summer school|saw|i saw what you did|breakfast of champions|who's harry crumb?|secrets of an undercover wife|saw iv|dogtown|face of evil|the grudge 3|... |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Queen Victoria ->... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 79,
"ground_truth": "united kingdom",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Theodore Lesieg -... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 80,
"ground_truth": "lincoln college, oxford|university of oxford|dartmouth college",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Luis Suárez -> so... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 81,
"ground_truth": "uruguay national football team|fc barcelona",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Spain -> location... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 82,
"ground_truth": "euro",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Meg Griffin -> cv... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 83,
"ground_truth": "mila kunis",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Dubai -> travel.t... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 85,
"ground_truth": "burj khalifa",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Angelina Jolie ->... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 87,
"ground_truth": "a place in time|unbroken|by the sea|in the land of blood and honey",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Martin Luther Kin... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 88,
"ground_truth": "memphis",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Tutankhamun -> ba... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 89,
"ground_truth": "-1332",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Dominican Republi... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 90,
"ground_truth": "leonel fernández",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Julia Roberts -> ... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 91,
"ground_truth": "lyle lovett|daniel moder",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Baltimore Ravens ... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 92,
"ground_truth": "m&t bank stadium",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Brandon Dubinsky ... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 93,
"ground_truth": "columbus blue jackets",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Taylor Swift -> b... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 94,
"ground_truth": "joe jonas|harry styles",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Israel -> languag... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 95,
"ground_truth": "arabic language|hebrew language",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Nigeria -> locati... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 96,
"ground_truth": "english language",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Benjamin Franklin... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 97,
"ground_truth": "author|librarian|statesman|writer|diplomat|printer|satirist|musician|inventor|political activist|scientist|politician",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Catholicism -> re... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 98,
"ground_truth": "book of nehemiah|old testament|new testament|the bible",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Lola Bunny -> fil... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 99,
"ground_truth": "britt mckillip",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Rufus Wainwright ... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 100,
"ground_truth": "jörn weisbrodt",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
C. S. Lewis -> ed... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 101,
"ground_truth": "university of oxford|university college, oxford",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
European Union ->... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 102,
"ground_truth": "jerzy buzek",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Cassie Bernall ->... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 103,
"ground_truth": "columbine high school",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
James Frey -> fil... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 104,
"ground_truth": "sugar: the fall of the west|kissing a fool",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Rob Kardashian ->... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 105,
"ground_truth": "appendicitis",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Matthew the Apost... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 106,
"ground_truth": "matthew 5:20|gospel of matthew",
"split": "train"
} |
WebQSP | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Nelson Mandela ->... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 107,
"ground_truth": "methodism",
"split": "train"
} |
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio
YAML Metadata Warning:empty or missing yaml metadata in repo card
Check out the documentation for more information.
- Downloads last month
- 4