data_source stringclasses 1
value | prompt stringlengths 411 10.2M | ability stringclasses 1
value | reward_model dict | extra_info dict |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
george washington... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"ground_truth": "washington, d.c."
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
super bowl -> tim... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"ground_truth": "super bowl xlvii|super bowl xxxv"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
the orange and bl... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"ground_truth": "florida gators football"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
tupac shakur -> m... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"ground_truth": "gridlock'd"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
spain -> base.aar... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"ground_truth": "portugal"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
jerry jones -> sp... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"ground_truth": "barry switzer"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
malcolm glazer ->... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"ground_truth": "manchester united f.c."
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
zac efron -> peop... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"ground_truth": "robot chicken: star wars episode iii"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
detroit business ... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"ground_truth": "businessperson|business magnate|industrialist|inventor|engineer|entrepreneur"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
history world tou... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"ground_truth": "scarecrow"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
tyson chandler ->... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"ground_truth": "dallas mavericks"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
parkinson's disea... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"ground_truth": "mao zedong"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
riptide the pelic... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"ground_truth": "tulane university"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
terry collins -> ... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"ground_truth": "1986 world series"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
central time zone... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"ground_truth": "canada"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
southern peninsul... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"ground_truth": "icelandic language"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
england -> organi... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"ground_truth": "wales"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
1948 stanley cup ... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"ground_truth": "ice hockey"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
purdue boilermake... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"ground_truth": "west lafayette"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
dallas -> travel.... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"ground_truth": "dallas zoo"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
cristiano ronaldo... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"ground_truth": "real madrid c.f."
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
homer -> common.t... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"ground_truth": "homer|rally|chief noc-a-homa"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
nicolas sarkozy -... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"ground_truth": "françois hollande"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
down district cou... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"ground_truth": "northern ireland"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
denmark -> olympi... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"ground_truth": "germany"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
male -> common.to... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"ground_truth": "jaxon bieber"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
de divina proport... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"ground_truth": "amboise"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
china -> base.aar... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"ground_truth": "sudan"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
tom thibodeau -> ... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"ground_truth": "tom thibodeau"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
the yale herald -... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"ground_truth": "new haven"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
italy -> olympics... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"ground_truth": "turkey|monaco|spain|france"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
united states sen... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"ground_truth": "saxby chambliss"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
fotheringhay cast... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"ground_truth": "catholicism"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
john madden -> sp... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"ground_truth": "oregon ducks football"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
el seibo province... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"ground_truth": "dominican peso"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
communist party o... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"ground_truth": "mao zedong"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
massachusetts -> ... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"ground_truth": "christianity"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
costa rican colón... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"ground_truth": "bribri language|jamaican creole english language|limonese creole|spanish language"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
american revoluti... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"ground_truth": "charles cornwallis, 1st marquess cornwallis"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
kevin mchale -> b... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"ground_truth": "1994 nba finals"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
the cry of love t... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"ground_truth": "blues|acid rock|blues rock|heavy metal|psychedelic rock|rock music|rhythm and blues|experimental rock|funk rock|psychedelia|progressive rock|hard rock"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
rathfarnham -> lo... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"ground_truth": "india|ottoman empire"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
jackie robinson -... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"ground_truth": "john muir high school"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
national anthem o... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"ground_truth": "south america|americas"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
margrethe ii of d... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"ground_truth": "greenlandic language|danish language|faroese|german language"
} |
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio
YAML Metadata Warning:empty or missing yaml metadata in repo card
Check out the documentation for more information.
- Downloads last month
- 9