data_source stringclasses 1
value | prompt stringlengths 402 10.2M | ability stringclasses 1
value | reward_model dict | extra_info dict |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
george washington... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 0,
"ground_truth": "washington, d.c.",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
super bowl -> tim... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 1,
"ground_truth": "super bowl xlvii|super bowl xxxv",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
the orange and bl... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 2,
"ground_truth": "florida gators football",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
tupac shakur -> m... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 3,
"ground_truth": "gridlock'd",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
spain -> base.aar... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 4,
"ground_truth": "portugal",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
jerry jones -> sp... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 5,
"ground_truth": "barry switzer",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Demi World Tour ... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 6,
"ground_truth": "nicholas braun|joe jonas|cody linley",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
malcolm glazer ->... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 7,
"ground_truth": "manchester united f.c.",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
zac efron -> peop... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 8,
"ground_truth": "robot chicken: star wars episode iii",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
detroit business ... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 9,
"ground_truth": "businessperson|business magnate|industrialist|inventor|engineer|entrepreneur",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
history world tou... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 10,
"ground_truth": "scarecrow",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
tyson chandler ->... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 11,
"ground_truth": "dallas mavericks",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
parkinson's disea... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 12,
"ground_truth": "mao zedong",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
riptide the pelic... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 13,
"ground_truth": "tulane university",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
terry collins -> ... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 14,
"ground_truth": "1986 world series",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
central time zone... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 15,
"ground_truth": "canada",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
southern peninsul... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 16,
"ground_truth": "icelandic language",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
england -> organi... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 17,
"ground_truth": "wales",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
1948 stanley cup ... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 18,
"ground_truth": "ice hockey",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
purdue boilermake... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 19,
"ground_truth": "west lafayette",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
dallas -> travel.... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 20,
"ground_truth": "dallas zoo",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
cristiano ronaldo... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 21,
"ground_truth": "real madrid c.f.",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
homer -> common.t... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 23,
"ground_truth": "homer|rally|chief noc-a-homa",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
nicolas sarkozy -... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 24,
"ground_truth": "françois hollande",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
down district cou... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 25,
"ground_truth": "northern ireland",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
denmark -> olympi... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 26,
"ground_truth": "germany",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
male -> common.to... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 27,
"ground_truth": "jaxon bieber",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Rio de Janeiro -... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 28,
"ground_truth": "brazilian real",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
de divina proport... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 29,
"ground_truth": "amboise",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
china -> base.aar... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 30,
"ground_truth": "sudan",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
tom thibodeau -> ... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 31,
"ground_truth": "tom thibodeau",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
the yale herald -... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 32,
"ground_truth": "new haven",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Orthodox Autocep... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 33,
"ground_truth": "tirana",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
italy -> olympics... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 34,
"ground_truth": "turkey|monaco|spain|france",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
united states sen... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 35,
"ground_truth": "saxby chambliss",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
fotheringhay cast... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 36,
"ground_truth": "catholicism",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
john madden -> sp... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 37,
"ground_truth": "oregon ducks football",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
el seibo province... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 38,
"ground_truth": "dominican peso",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
communist party o... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 39,
"ground_truth": "mao zedong",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
massachusetts -> ... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 40,
"ground_truth": "christianity",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
costa rican colón... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 41,
"ground_truth": "bribri language|jamaican creole english language|limonese creole|spanish language",
"split": "train"
} |
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio
YAML Metadata Warning:empty or missing yaml metadata in repo card
Check out the documentation for more information.
- Downloads last month
- 3