data_source stringclasses 1
value | prompt stringlengths 402 5.88k | ability stringclasses 1
value | reward_model dict | extra_info dict |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
George Washingto... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 0,
"ground_truth": "washington, d.c.",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Super Bowl -> ti... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 1,
"ground_truth": "super bowl xlvii|super bowl xxxv",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
The Orange and B... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 2,
"ground_truth": "florida gators football",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Mr. Woodson -> f... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 3,
"ground_truth": "gridlock'd",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Spain -> geograp... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 4,
"ground_truth": "portugal",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Jerry Jones -> p... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 5,
"ground_truth": "barry switzer",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Demi World Tour ... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 6,
"ground_truth": "nicholas braun|joe jonas|cody linley",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Malcolm Glazer -... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 7,
"ground_truth": "manchester united f.c.",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Detroit Business... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 9,
"ground_truth": "businessperson|business magnate|industrialist|inventor|engineer|entrepreneur",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
HIStory World To... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 10,
"ground_truth": "scarecrow",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Tyson Chandler -... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 11,
"ground_truth": "dallas mavericks",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Parkinson's dise... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 12,
"ground_truth": "mao zedong",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Riptide the Peli... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 13,
"ground_truth": "tulane university",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Terry Collins ->... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 14,
"ground_truth": "1986 world series",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Central Time Zon... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 15,
"ground_truth": "canada",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Southern Peninsu... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 16,
"ground_truth": "icelandic language",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Noddfa, Treorchy... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 17,
"ground_truth": "wales",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Purdue Boilermak... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 19,
"ground_truth": "west lafayette",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Dallas -> travel... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 20,
"ground_truth": "dallas zoo",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
1956 Pequeña Cop... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 21,
"ground_truth": "real madrid c.f.",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Homer -> sports.... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 23,
"ground_truth": "homer|rally|chief noc-a-homa",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Nicolas Sarkozy ... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 24,
"ground_truth": "françois hollande",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Down District Co... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 25,
"ground_truth": "northern ireland",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Country -> commo... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 26,
"ground_truth": "germany",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Male -> people.p... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 27,
"ground_truth": "jaxon bieber",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Rio de Janeiro -... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 28,
"ground_truth": "brazilian real",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
China -> base.aa... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 30,
"ground_truth": "sudan",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Tom Thibodeau ->... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 31,
"ground_truth": "tom thibodeau",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
The Yale Herald ... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 32,
"ground_truth": "new haven",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Orthodox Autocep... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 33,
"ground_truth": "tirana",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Italy -> olympic... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 34,
"ground_truth": "turkey|monaco|spain|france",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
United States Se... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 35,
"ground_truth": "saxby chambliss",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Fotheringhay Cas... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 36,
"ground_truth": "catholicism",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
John Madden -> s... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 37,
"ground_truth": "oregon ducks football",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
El Seibo Provinc... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 38,
"ground_truth": "dominican peso",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Communist Party ... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 39,
"ground_truth": "mao zedong",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Massachusetts ->... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 40,
"ground_truth": "christianity",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Costa Rican coló... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 41,
"ground_truth": "bribri language|jamaican creole english language|limonese creole|spanish language",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
American Revolut... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 42,
"ground_truth": "charles cornwallis, 1st marquess cornwallis|charles cornwallis, 1st marquess cornwallis",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Kevin McHale -> ... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 43,
"ground_truth": "1994 nba finals",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
The Cry of Love ... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 44,
"ground_truth": "blues|acid rock|blues rock|heavy metal|psychedelic rock|rock music|rhythm and blues|experimental rock|funk rock|psychedelia|progressive rock|hard rock",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Rathfarnham -> l... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 45,
"ground_truth": "india|ottoman empire",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Jackie Robinson ... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 46,
"ground_truth": "john muir high school",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
National Anthem ... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 47,
"ground_truth": "south america|americas",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Margrethe II of ... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 48,
"ground_truth": "greenlandic language|danish language|faroese|german language",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Jessica Simpson ... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 49,
"ground_truth": "eric johnson",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Taylor Lautner -... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 51,
"ground_truth": "he's a bully, charlie brown",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Secretary of Sta... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 52,
"ground_truth": "edward livingston",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Daniel Snyder ->... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 53,
"ground_truth": "washington, d.c.",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Jacob Black -> f... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 54,
"ground_truth": "taylor lautner",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Romania -> locat... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 55,
"ground_truth": "ukraine",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Afghan afghani -... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 56,
"ground_truth": "afghanistan",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Nestle Belarusia... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 57,
"ground_truth": "food processing|ice cream and frozen dessert manufacturing|soft drink manufacturing|bottled water manufacturing|cookies and crackers|chocolate and cocoa products|bottled and canned soft drinks and carbonated waters",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Yardymli Distric... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 58,
"ground_truth": "eurasia",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Azua Province ->... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 60,
"ground_truth": "dominican republic",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
El Seibo Provinc... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 61,
"ground_truth": "dominican peso",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
State flower -> ... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 62,
"ground_truth": "american robin|apple blossom",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Tour Anfibio -> ... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 63,
"ground_truth": "colombia",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Spain -> geograp... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 64,
"ground_truth": "portugal",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Apple tree -> me... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 65,
"ground_truth": "olympia",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Shche ne vmerla ... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 66,
"ground_truth": "ukrainian hryvnia",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Michoacán -> bas... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 67,
"ground_truth": "mexican peso",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
God Defend New Z... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 68,
"ground_truth": "parliamentary system|unitary state|constitutional monarchy",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Luitpold Gymnasi... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 69,
"ground_truth": "eth zurich|university of zurich",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Tiến Quân Ca -> ... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 70,
"ground_truth": "communist state|socialist state|single-party state",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Ukrainian Greek ... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 71,
"ground_truth": "ukraine",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Mrs. Met -> spor... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 72,
"ground_truth": "1986 world series",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Renminbi -> loca... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 74,
"ground_truth": "standard chinese",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Benjamin Netanya... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 75,
"ground_truth": "judaism",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Eastern Time Zon... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 76,
"ground_truth": "canada",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Kushinagar -> lo... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 77,
"ground_truth": "buddhism",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
1993 College Wor... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 78,
"ground_truth": "lsu tigers football",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Mecca -> religio... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 79,
"ground_truth": "islam",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Bradley Walsh ->... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 80,
"ground_truth": "los angeles",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Barack Obama -> ... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 81,
"ground_truth": "columbia university",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Stephen G. Haine... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 83,
"ground_truth": "washington, d.c.",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
United Nations S... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 84,
"ground_truth": "croatia|france",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Queen Victoria -... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 85,
"ground_truth": "the canadas",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Qunu, Eastern Ca... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 86,
"ground_truth": "methodism",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
National Anthem ... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 87,
"ground_truth": "russian language",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Spain -> locatio... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 88,
"ground_truth": "france",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Quarterback -> s... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 89,
"ground_truth": "matt moore|ryan tannehill",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Ulsan -> locatio... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 90,
"ground_truth": "presidential system|unitary state|constitutional republic",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Western Europe -... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 91,
"ground_truth": "france",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Virginia -> loca... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 92,
"ground_truth": "jim webb",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Gilbert Islands ... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 93,
"ground_truth": "kiribati",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Eastern Time Zon... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 94,
"ground_truth": "coral gables",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Nassau Weekly ->... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 95,
"ground_truth": "princeton university",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
1995 World Serie... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 96,
"ground_truth": "1995 world series",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
James D. Stern -... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 97,
"ground_truth": "tom thibodeau",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
2007 AFC Champio... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 98,
"ground_truth": "afc south",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Perspective -> b... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 99,
"ground_truth": "post-impressionism",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Mountain Time Zo... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 100,
"ground_truth": "kansas|montana|nebraska|north dakota|south dakota",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Sony Overseas S.... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 101,
"ground_truth": "minato",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
President -> gov... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 102,
"ground_truth": "reuven rivlin",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Lyon -> location... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 103,
"ground_truth": "france",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Kennebunkport ->... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 104,
"ground_truth": "university yale",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
1970 NBA Finals ... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 105,
"ground_truth": "1973 nba finals",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Matt Barnes -> s... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 106,
"ground_truth": "los angeles lakers",
"split": "train"
} |
CWQ | Based on the reasoning paths, answer the question using them as reliable but possibly incomplete evidence.
Requirements:
1. Identify the answer names and separate them with `|`.
2. Wrap the final result in \boxed{}. Example: \boxed{Answer1 | Answer2}
3. Output ONLY the boxed result.
Reasoning Paths:
Charlton Heston ... | kgqa | {
"style": "rule"
} | {
"global_id": 107,
"ground_truth": "los angeles|los angeles",
"split": "train"
} |
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio
YAML Metadata Warning:empty or missing yaml metadata in repo card
Check out the documentation for more information.
- Downloads last month
- 3