workspace stringclasses 1
value | channel stringclasses 1
value | sentences stringlengths 1 3.93k | ts stringlengths 26 26 | user stringlengths 2 11 | sentence_id stringlengths 44 53 | timestamp float64 1.5B 1.56B | __index_level_0__ int64 0 106k |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
pythondev | help | So I think you need to change your mysql connection string to be looking at the port, not a local socket | 2017-07-10T16:12:39.037444 | Beula | pythondev_help_Beula_2017-07-10T16:12:39.037444 | 1,499,703,159.037444 | 84,503 |
pythondev | help | okay I’ll try.
```
docker run --name=test-app -p 8000:8000 -it -v $PWD:/app --link -p 3306 -h localhost my-db --env-file=.env myapp:dev
```
this one;)? sorry, I :disappointed:confused | 2017-07-10T16:13:54.076097 | Bella | pythondev_help_Bella_2017-07-10T16:13:54.076097 | 1,499,703,234.076097 | 84,504 |
pythondev | help | that looks invalid, `--link` requires an argument | 2017-07-10T16:14:57.109369 | Beula | pythondev_help_Beula_2017-07-10T16:14:57.109369 | 1,499,703,297.109369 | 84,505 |
pythondev | help | I am saying, just use what you originally posted, but in your app code where you connect to the database, use the hostname `my-db` | 2017-07-10T16:15:21.122177 | Beula | pythondev_help_Beula_2017-07-10T16:15:21.122177 | 1,499,703,321.122177 | 84,506 |
pythondev | help | What lib are you using to talk to your DB? | 2017-07-10T16:17:50.201199 | Beula | pythondev_help_Beula_2017-07-10T16:17:50.201199 | 1,499,703,470.201199 | 84,507 |
pythondev | help | mysql-python | 2017-07-10T16:19:51.263498 | Bella | pythondev_help_Bella_2017-07-10T16:19:51.263498 | 1,499,703,591.263498 | 84,508 |
pythondev | help | and uri for now
```
SQLALCHEMY_DATABASE_URI = '<mysql://root:t123@localhost/dstore>'
``` | 2017-07-10T16:20:38.288223 | Bella | pythondev_help_Bella_2017-07-10T16:20:38.288223 | 1,499,703,638.288223 | 84,509 |
pythondev | help | So presuming you are using `--link my-db`, you should be able to change `localhost` to `my-db` for the host | 2017-07-10T16:21:25.313133 | Beula | pythondev_help_Beula_2017-07-10T16:21:25.313133 | 1,499,703,685.313133 | 84,510 |
pythondev | help | One moment, I’ll try. | 2017-07-10T16:23:12.370567 | Bella | pythondev_help_Bella_2017-07-10T16:23:12.370567 | 1,499,703,792.370567 | 84,511 |
pythondev | help | <@Beula> unrelated question, but can you theoretically share the socket between containers? or is this too ridiculous? | 2017-07-10T16:28:57.553754 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-07-10T16:28:57.553754 | 1,499,704,137.553754 | 84,512 |
pythondev | help | <@Beula> Thanks! it’s working!!! beer from me:beers: | 2017-07-10T16:30:17.596907 | Bella | pythondev_help_Bella_2017-07-10T16:30:17.596907 | 1,499,704,217.596907 | 84,513 |
pythondev | help | I am sure there is a way, since a container can declare volumes it provides. I would think that's possible | 2017-07-10T16:30:20.598836 | Beula | pythondev_help_Beula_2017-07-10T16:30:20.598836 | 1,499,704,220.598836 | 84,514 |
pythondev | help | But I just use the ports, since it's just simpler | 2017-07-10T16:30:34.606466 | Beula | pythondev_help_Beula_2017-07-10T16:30:34.606466 | 1,499,704,234.606466 | 84,515 |
pythondev | help | I spend all day for this:disappointed: | 2017-07-10T16:30:41.610563 | Bella | pythondev_help_Bella_2017-07-10T16:30:41.610563 | 1,499,704,241.610563 | 84,516 |
pythondev | help | I'm just thinking network might be slower, especially abstracted away by docker... | 2017-07-10T16:31:08.624940 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-07-10T16:31:08.624940 | 1,499,704,268.62494 | 84,517 |
pythondev | help | app was running, But when I checked in browser, I can’t open the app.
app running on 50 port, I think I need to add `EXPOSE 50` to the Dockerfile?
<@Beula> | 2017-07-10T16:32:32.670273 | Bella | pythondev_help_Bella_2017-07-10T16:32:32.670273 | 1,499,704,352.670273 | 84,518 |
pythondev | help | <@Beula> :taco: | 2017-07-10T16:33:19.695100 | Signe | pythondev_help_Signe_2017-07-10T16:33:19.695100 | 1,499,704,399.6951 | 84,519 |
pythondev | help | <@Bella> not enough info on "cant open the app" | 2017-07-10T16:34:24.730102 | Signe | pythondev_help_Signe_2017-07-10T16:34:24.730102 | 1,499,704,464.730102 | 84,520 |
pythondev | help | just port forwarding should expose | 2017-07-10T16:34:33.735454 | Signe | pythondev_help_Signe_2017-07-10T16:34:33.735454 | 1,499,704,473.735454 | 84,521 |
pythondev | help | but your docker run port forwards port 8000 not port 50 | 2017-07-10T16:35:08.753853 | Signe | pythondev_help_Signe_2017-07-10T16:35:08.753853 | 1,499,704,508.753853 | 84,522 |
pythondev | help | so that might be your issue | 2017-07-10T16:35:12.755774 | Signe | pythondev_help_Signe_2017-07-10T16:35:12.755774 | 1,499,704,512.755774 | 84,523 |
pythondev | help | no, 8000 didn’t work too, I’ll try rebuild image, and will add `EXPOSE` | 2017-07-10T16:36:45.804977 | Bella | pythondev_help_Bella_2017-07-10T16:36:45.804977 | 1,499,704,605.804977 | 84,524 |
pythondev | help | <@Signe> thanks for help | 2017-07-10T16:36:54.809362 | Bella | pythondev_help_Bella_2017-07-10T16:36:54.809362 | 1,499,704,614.809362 | 84,525 |
pythondev | help | ! | 2017-07-10T16:36:55.809811 | Bella | pythondev_help_Bella_2017-07-10T16:36:55.809811 | 1,499,704,615.809811 | 84,526 |
pythondev | help | The taco bot should be renamed to 'tacos y cervezas' or for a more relaxed/friendly label, 'tacos y chelas' or 'tacos y unas frías' | 2017-07-10T17:22:22.171592 | Deedee | pythondev_help_Deedee_2017-07-10T17:22:22.171592 | 1,499,707,342.171592 | 84,527 |
pythondev | help | <@Bella> FYI: <https://github.com/pyslackers/community/blob/master/introduction.md#taco-bot-taco> | 2017-07-10T17:24:32.229327 | Deedee | pythondev_help_Deedee_2017-07-10T17:24:32.229327 | 1,499,707,472.229327 | 84,528 |
pythondev | help | Question about os.stats().st_atime | 2017-07-10T18:06:27.247744 | Staci | pythondev_help_Staci_2017-07-10T18:06:27.247744 | 1,499,709,987.247744 | 84,529 |
pythondev | help | It's a timestamp representing the last time a file was accessed | 2017-07-10T18:06:45.253941 | Staci | pythondev_help_Staci_2017-07-10T18:06:45.253941 | 1,499,710,005.253941 | 84,530 |
pythondev | help | but its returning a negative number | 2017-07-10T18:07:12.263016 | Staci | pythondev_help_Staci_2017-07-10T18:07:12.263016 | 1,499,710,032.263016 | 84,531 |
pythondev | help | -11644473600 | 2017-07-10T18:07:31.269789 | Staci | pythondev_help_Staci_2017-07-10T18:07:31.269789 | 1,499,710,051.269789 | 84,532 |
pythondev | help | which if I use the absolute value represents a Dec 31, 2338 | 2017-07-10T18:08:03.280733 | Staci | pythondev_help_Staci_2017-07-10T18:08:03.280733 | 1,499,710,083.280733 | 84,533 |
pythondev | help | Does this mean the file has never been accessed? | 2017-07-10T18:08:17.285818 | Staci | pythondev_help_Staci_2017-07-10T18:08:17.285818 | 1,499,710,097.285818 | 84,534 |
pythondev | help | Does `stat <file>` in your shell report the same thing? | 2017-07-10T18:11:03.342587 | Beula | pythondev_help_Beula_2017-07-10T18:11:03.342587 | 1,499,710,263.342587 | 84,535 |
pythondev | help | um, let me check. | 2017-07-10T18:15:27.432070 | Staci | pythondev_help_Staci_2017-07-10T18:15:27.432070 | 1,499,710,527.43207 | 84,536 |
pythondev | help | <@Staci> shouldnt atime be an unsigned number? | 2017-07-10T18:26:19.651600 | Carrol | pythondev_help_Carrol_2017-07-10T18:26:19.651600 | 1,499,711,179.6516 | 84,537 |
pythondev | help | Sorry, took me a minute | 2017-07-10T18:28:36.696177 | Staci | pythondev_help_Staci_2017-07-10T18:28:36.696177 | 1,499,711,316.696177 | 84,538 |
pythondev | help | This is on a network shared drive | 2017-07-10T18:29:08.706380 | Staci | pythondev_help_Staci_2017-07-10T18:29:08.706380 | 1,499,711,348.70638 | 84,539 |
pythondev | help | 12/31/1600 | 2017-07-10T18:29:58.721898 | Staci | pythondev_help_Staci_2017-07-10T18:29:58.721898 | 1,499,711,398.721898 | 84,540 |
pythondev | help | for all the tiles | 2017-07-10T18:30:02.723036 | Staci | pythondev_help_Staci_2017-07-10T18:30:02.723036 | 1,499,711,402.723036 | 84,541 |
pythondev | help | files* | 2017-07-10T18:30:04.723819 | Staci | pythondev_help_Staci_2017-07-10T18:30:04.723819 | 1,499,711,404.723819 | 84,542 |
pythondev | help | Weird | 2017-07-10T18:30:56.741017 | Staci | pythondev_help_Staci_2017-07-10T18:30:56.741017 | 1,499,711,456.741017 | 84,543 |
pythondev | help | it seems that you haven't accessed your files in a while :wink: | 2017-07-10T18:32:02.761465 | Carrol | pythondev_help_Carrol_2017-07-10T18:32:02.761465 | 1,499,711,522.761465 | 84,544 |
pythondev | help | haha I'm just wondering how they managed to access them back in 1600 with no computers | 2017-07-10T18:32:32.771155 | Staci | pythondev_help_Staci_2017-07-10T18:32:32.771155 | 1,499,711,552.771155 | 84,545 |
pythondev | help | That’s Windows for ya | 2017-07-10T18:33:02.780569 | Patty | pythondev_help_Patty_2017-07-10T18:33:02.780569 | 1,499,711,582.780569 | 84,546 |
pythondev | help | (well, Active Directory) | 2017-07-10T18:33:06.782121 | Patty | pythondev_help_Patty_2017-07-10T18:33:06.782121 | 1,499,711,586.782121 | 84,547 |
pythondev | help | I wonder if it has anything to do with noatime family of mount flags. they are often used with ssds | 2017-07-10T18:33:07.782319 | Carrol | pythondev_help_Carrol_2017-07-10T18:33:07.782319 | 1,499,711,587.782319 | 84,548 |
pythondev | help | with AD, times are represented as tickts from midnight, Jan 1 1600 in active directory, powershell cant handle it | 2017-07-10T18:34:01.799888 | Patty | pythondev_help_Patty_2017-07-10T18:34:01.799888 | 1,499,711,641.799888 | 84,549 |
pythondev | help | it means it wasnt accessed | 2017-07-10T18:34:05.801161 | Patty | pythondev_help_Patty_2017-07-10T18:34:05.801161 | 1,499,711,645.801161 | 84,550 |
pythondev | help | Well I just opened the file | 2017-07-10T18:34:28.808514 | Staci | pythondev_help_Staci_2017-07-10T18:34:28.808514 | 1,499,711,668.808514 | 84,551 |
pythondev | help | Powershell and AD have different epochs as well | 2017-07-10T18:34:33.810038 | Patty | pythondev_help_Patty_2017-07-10T18:34:33.810038 | 1,499,711,673.810038 | 84,552 |
pythondev | help | 0001 vs 1600 | 2017-07-10T18:34:42.812755 | Patty | pythondev_help_Patty_2017-07-10T18:34:42.812755 | 1,499,711,682.812755 | 84,553 |
pythondev | help | I think the network shared drive is doing something weird with the last accessed date | 2017-07-10T18:35:08.821188 | Staci | pythondev_help_Staci_2017-07-10T18:35:08.821188 | 1,499,711,708.821188 | 84,554 |
pythondev | help | I bet it doesn't update it to save drive's lifespan | 2017-07-10T18:35:36.829870 | Carrol | pythondev_help_Carrol_2017-07-10T18:35:36.829870 | 1,499,711,736.82987 | 84,555 |
pythondev | help | yeah since it’s probably managed through AD | 2017-07-10T18:35:38.830296 | Patty | pythondev_help_Patty_2017-07-10T18:35:38.830296 | 1,499,711,738.830296 | 84,556 |
pythondev | help | basically, it’s a combination of python, Windows, PowerShell, and Active Directory in a storm of a mess | 2017-07-10T18:36:52.852584 | Patty | pythondev_help_Patty_2017-07-10T18:36:52.852584 | 1,499,711,812.852584 | 84,557 |
pythondev | help | :sweat: | 2017-07-10T18:38:22.879896 | Staci | pythondev_help_Staci_2017-07-10T18:38:22.879896 | 1,499,711,902.879896 | 84,558 |
pythondev | help | AD permissions may also be preventing you (or the script) from seeing the last modified time | 2017-07-10T18:38:25.880714 | Patty | pythondev_help_Patty_2017-07-10T18:38:25.880714 | 1,499,711,905.880714 | 84,559 |
pythondev | help | That last accessed date was going to come in handy | 2017-07-10T18:40:58.927108 | Staci | pythondev_help_Staci_2017-07-10T18:40:58.927108 | 1,499,712,058.927108 | 84,560 |
pythondev | help | But it's all fucked | 2017-07-10T18:41:08.929919 | Staci | pythondev_help_Staci_2017-07-10T18:41:08.929919 | 1,499,712,068.929919 | 84,561 |
pythondev | help | There are like 100,000 files I'm trying to work with, and find out which ones need to be uploaded to a new server and which ones are trash | 2017-07-10T18:41:39.939400 | Staci | pythondev_help_Staci_2017-07-10T18:41:39.939400 | 1,499,712,099.9394 | 84,562 |
pythondev | help | have you tried disabling the archive bit on any of the files? | 2017-07-10T18:42:25.952956 | Patty | pythondev_help_Patty_2017-07-10T18:42:25.952956 | 1,499,712,145.952956 | 84,563 |
pythondev | help | its the checkbox marked “Archive” that comes up when looking at the info | 2017-07-10T18:42:37.956759 | Patty | pythondev_help_Patty_2017-07-10T18:42:37.956759 | 1,499,712,157.956759 | 84,564 |
pythondev | help | I noticed it, I haven't attempted anything yet | 2017-07-10T18:44:12.985306 | Staci | pythondev_help_Staci_2017-07-10T18:44:12.985306 | 1,499,712,252.985306 | 84,565 |
pythondev | help | What does that do? | 2017-07-10T18:44:53.998153 | Staci | pythondev_help_Staci_2017-07-10T18:44:53.998153 | 1,499,712,293.998153 | 84,566 |
pythondev | help | ah wait, is the network drive running on a windows server? | 2017-07-10T18:44:55.998745 | Patty | pythondev_help_Patty_2017-07-10T18:44:55.998745 | 1,499,712,295.998745 | 84,567 |
pythondev | help | its a bit that gets marked when the file is archived - which has some weird definitions | 2017-07-10T18:45:09.003157 | Patty | pythondev_help_Patty_2017-07-10T18:45:09.003157 | 1,499,712,309.003157 | 84,568 |
pythondev | help | I'd have to check our admin, I'm not sure what system we're using. I think it's hosted by another company | 2017-07-10T18:45:54.016394 | Staci | pythondev_help_Staci_2017-07-10T18:45:54.016394 | 1,499,712,354.016394 | 84,569 |
pythondev | help | sorry running out the door but if this isnt turned on on the share, you wont get back access times: <https://gallery.technet.microsoft.com/How-to-enable-File-and-af674be4> | 2017-07-10T18:48:08.056589 | Patty | pythondev_help_Patty_2017-07-10T18:48:08.056589 | 1,499,712,488.056589 | 84,570 |
pythondev | help | Thanks for the info <@Patty>
This is probably a silly question, but do you by chance know if this was enabled if it would retro date everything accessed previously? This is probably a pipe dream, but maybe the data is stored locally on everyone's own PCs? | 2017-07-10T19:08:51.421995 | Staci | pythondev_help_Staci_2017-07-10T19:08:51.421995 | 1,499,713,731.421995 | 84,571 |
pythondev | help | Anyone ever worked with Stripe to create a UK managed account? | 2017-07-10T19:20:56.620387 | Temika | pythondev_help_Temika_2017-07-10T19:20:56.620387 | 1,499,714,456.620387 | 84,572 |
pythondev | help | <@Staci> if auditing is the issue and it wasn’t on then you probably wont. Unless someone replaced a file with their local version then maybe | 2017-07-10T19:22:35.646462 | Patty | pythondev_help_Patty_2017-07-10T19:22:35.646462 | 1,499,714,555.646462 | 84,573 |
pythondev | help | Have you tried `os.path.getmtime(path)`? | 2017-07-10T19:28:19.737266 | Patty | pythondev_help_Patty_2017-07-10T19:28:19.737266 | 1,499,714,899.737266 | 84,574 |
pythondev | help | I haven't. I'll test it | 2017-07-10T19:33:15.816095 | Staci | pythondev_help_Staci_2017-07-10T19:33:15.816095 | 1,499,715,195.816095 | 84,575 |
pythondev | help | Same thing, pretty sure both methods are retrieving the same attribute | 2017-07-10T19:35:45.855009 | Staci | pythondev_help_Staci_2017-07-10T19:35:45.855009 | 1,499,715,345.855009 | 84,576 |
pythondev | help | Anyone on tonight? Or maybe tag me if you see this in the morning?
How would I get the index of a namedtuple field through code without looking at the definition? This is so I can write a code that will use this named tuple by field name rather than index so if the indexes change later down the line with code changes ... | 2017-07-10T22:42:33.195357 | Meghan | pythondev_help_Meghan_2017-07-10T22:42:33.195357 | 1,499,726,553.195357 | 84,577 |
pythondev | help | 1st, this:
```
if include is None:
include = []
if exclude is None:
exclude = []
```
to:
```
if not include:
include = []
if not exclude:
exclude = []
``` | 2017-07-10T23:00:19.383704 | Deedee | pythondev_help_Deedee_2017-07-10T23:00:19.383704 | 1,499,727,619.383704 | 84,578 |
pythondev | help | Oh, good catch. Oops. PyCharm should have told me that one. | 2017-07-10T23:01:11.393985 | Meghan | pythondev_help_Meghan_2017-07-10T23:01:11.393985 | 1,499,727,671.393985 | 84,579 |
pythondev | help | ```
counter = Counter()
for entry in queries:
if _query_filter(entry.client, include, exclude):
counter[entry[index_to_count]] += 1
return counter
``` | 2017-07-10T23:01:18.395334 | Deedee | pythondev_help_Deedee_2017-07-10T23:01:18.395334 | 1,499,727,678.395334 | 84,580 |
pythondev | help | walk me through this | 2017-07-10T23:01:30.397486 | Deedee | pythondev_help_Deedee_2017-07-10T23:01:30.397486 | 1,499,727,690.397486 | 84,581 |
pythondev | help | Counter is the Counter from collections. Queries is a list of the Query namedtuple. _query_filter is essentially grep and returns a boolean as to whether to include that entry in the counter or not.
index_to_count is the index of the named tuple. That is where I would much prefer to say Query.query rather than entry[i... | 2017-07-10T23:04:05.424818 | Meghan | pythondev_help_Meghan_2017-07-10T23:04:05.424818 | 1,499,727,845.424818 | 84,582 |
pythondev | help | Or, Query.client, I think it was in that example. | 2017-07-10T23:04:25.428287 | Meghan | pythondev_help_Meghan_2017-07-10T23:04:25.428287 | 1,499,727,865.428287 | 84,583 |
pythondev | help | I have two functions, at present, that use the _counts_generic, rather than each repeating the whole function and specifying entry.query or entry.client from the namedtuple. | 2017-07-10T23:05:07.435471 | Meghan | pythondev_help_Meghan_2017-07-10T23:05:07.435471 | 1,499,727,907.435471 | 84,584 |
pythondev | help | ```
def counts_query(queries: list, include: list=None, exclude: list=None) -> dict:
"""
Counts queries and returns a Counter of all domains queries
Filters are literal and must match exactly
:param queries: list of Query namedtuples
:param include: list of items to include, works as wh... | 2017-07-10T23:06:22.449034 | Meghan | pythondev_help_Meghan_2017-07-10T23:06:22.449034 | 1,499,727,982.449034 | 84,585 |
pythondev | help | ```
if include:
if entry in include and entry not in exclude:
return True
else:
if entry not in exclude:
return True
return False
```
Does this work the same if:
```
if include:
if entry in include and entry not in exclude:
return True
elif entry n... | 2017-07-10T23:19:37.582076 | Deedee | pythondev_help_Deedee_2017-07-10T23:19:37.582076 | 1,499,728,777.582076 | 84,586 |
pythondev | help | Yeah, it would. I shouldn't program at night. :slightly_smiling_face: | 2017-07-10T23:20:46.592963 | Meghan | pythondev_help_Meghan_2017-07-10T23:20:46.592963 | 1,499,728,846.592963 | 84,587 |
pythondev | help | Though, in yours the else isn't necessary. | 2017-07-10T23:21:11.597003 | Meghan | pythondev_help_Meghan_2017-07-10T23:21:11.597003 | 1,499,728,871.597003 | 84,588 |
pythondev | help | technically, this could all be brought down to:
```
if entry not in include:
return True
else:
return False
```
right? | 2017-07-10T23:23:22.617615 | Deedee | pythondev_help_Deedee_2017-07-10T23:23:22.617615 | 1,499,729,002.617615 | 84,589 |
pythondev | help | No. Include is a whitelist, if include is empty it should give all entries not in exclude. | 2017-07-10T23:23:52.622278 | Meghan | pythondev_help_Meghan_2017-07-10T23:23:52.622278 | 1,499,729,032.622278 | 84,590 |
pythondev | help | because in both of the first 2 if's you are demanding that `entry` not be an element of exclude | 2017-07-10T23:23:58.623288 | Deedee | pythondev_help_Deedee_2017-07-10T23:23:58.623288 | 1,499,729,038.623288 | 84,591 |
pythondev | help | okay,
```
def _query_filter(entry: str, include: list = None, exclude: list = None)\
-> bool:
if include:
if entry in include and entry not in exclude:
return True
else:
if entry not in exclude:
return True
return False
``` | 2017-07-10T23:24:42.630274 | Deedee | pythondev_help_Deedee_2017-07-10T23:24:42.630274 | 1,499,729,082.630274 | 84,592 |
pythondev | help | this is yoru orginal code | 2017-07-10T23:24:49.631251 | Deedee | pythondev_help_Deedee_2017-07-10T23:24:49.631251 | 1,499,729,089.631251 | 84,593 |
pythondev | help | so if `include is None`, it goes to the `else` and checks that `entry` be an element of `exclude` | 2017-07-10T23:25:36.638704 | Deedee | pythondev_help_Deedee_2017-07-10T23:25:36.638704 | 1,499,729,136.638704 | 84,594 |
pythondev | help | right? | 2017-07-10T23:25:41.639434 | Deedee | pythondev_help_Deedee_2017-07-10T23:25:41.639434 | 1,499,729,141.639434 | 84,595 |
pythondev | help | sorry... NOT an element of `exclude` | 2017-07-10T23:26:01.642691 | Deedee | pythondev_help_Deedee_2017-07-10T23:26:01.642691 | 1,499,729,161.642691 | 84,596 |
pythondev | help | Right. | 2017-07-10T23:26:05.643413 | Meghan | pythondev_help_Meghan_2017-07-10T23:26:05.643413 | 1,499,729,165.643413 | 84,597 |
pythondev | help | but if include NOT None, you are checking that `entry` not an element of `exclude` | 2017-07-10T23:26:41.649382 | Deedee | pythondev_help_Deedee_2017-07-10T23:26:41.649382 | 1,499,729,201.649382 | 84,598 |
pythondev | help | ```
if include:
if entry in include and entry not in exclude:
return True
elif entry not in exclude:
return True
return False
```
I could remove the if include and include it in the next if | 2017-07-10T23:26:47.650206 | Meghan | pythondev_help_Meghan_2017-07-10T23:26:47.650206 | 1,499,729,207.650206 | 84,599 |
pythondev | help | I'm just saying that `if include:` doesn't seem to have any bearing on what the condition does. | 2017-07-10T23:27:41.659421 | Deedee | pythondev_help_Deedee_2017-07-10T23:27:41.659421 | 1,499,729,261.659421 | 84,600 |
pythondev | help | because entry still has to NOT be an element in `exclude` | 2017-07-10T23:27:58.661874 | Deedee | pythondev_help_Deedee_2017-07-10T23:27:58.661874 | 1,499,729,278.661874 | 84,601 |
pythondev | help | so essentially this function returns False when entry is in exclude, regardless of anything else that happens. | 2017-07-10T23:29:40.678535 | Deedee | pythondev_help_Deedee_2017-07-10T23:29:40.678535 | 1,499,729,380.678535 | 84,602 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.