Dataset Viewer
Auto-converted to Parquet Duplicate
Search is not available for this dataset
pdf
pdf

Overview

Modern AI systems often appear to work.

Outputs are fluent, structured, and factually correct.

But correctness is not the same as understanding.

This dataset captures a recurring pattern:

Systems remain accurate while meaning, intent, and grounding degrade.

Each document isolates a specific mechanism behind this failure and reframes common issues such as hallucination, evaluation gaps, and misalignment as expressions of a shared structural problem.


Contents


Concepts Covered

  • Accuracy vs understanding (evaluation gap)
  • Semantic drift (gradual meaning misalignment)
  • Fidelity decay (loss of context and structure over time)
  • Proxy optimization (metrics vs reality)
  • Human–AI cognition loops (externalized thinking)
  • Language compression (loss of internal structure)

Core Concept: Semantic Fidelity

This dataset introduces semantic fidelity as a way to evaluate whether meaning and intent are preserved across:

  • language
  • transformation
  • iteration
  • system boundaries

Most evaluation approaches focus on correctness at the output level.
This work focuses on whether meaning survives across the process.


Intended Use

This dataset is useful for:

  • analyzing LLM behavior beyond accuracy
  • understanding semantic drift and meaning loss
  • studying human–AI interaction and cognition
  • exploring alignment at the level of language and representation
  • building conceptual frameworks for AI system diagnostics

Not Intended For

This is not a benchmark dataset or training dataset.
It is a conceptual and analytical resource for understanding AI system behavior.


Core framework and sources


License

CC BY 4.0

Downloads last month
87