SNI-Data
Created by Bosch Center for Artificial Intelligence (BCAI)
Paper: Operator Learning with Domain Decomposition for Geometry Generalization in PDE Solving (ICLR 2026)
A benchmark of 2D finite-element PDE solutions for training and evaluating neural operators with geometry generalization. Each sample is a complete FEM problem defined on an unstructured triangular mesh—random polygon geometry, boundary conditions (Dirichlet and/or Neumann), and optionally coefficient fields or time-stepping parameters—paired with the solved solution field $u$.
The dataset accompanies the Schwarz Neural Inference (SNI) framework, which combines local operator learning with domain decomposition methods to generalize to unseen complex geometries at inference time.
Dataset Summary
| Property | Value |
|---|---|
| Domain | 2D Partial Differential Equations (FEM) |
| Number of PDE types | 5 |
| Training samples | 200,000 |
| Test samples (simple domains) | 26,500 |
| Test samples (evaluation domains) | 1,330 |
| Total samples | ~227,830 |
| File format | Pickle (.pkl) |
| Mesh type | Unstructured triangular (gmsh) |
| Solver | FEniCSx (dolfinx) |
PDE Types
| PDE | Equation | Boundary Conditions | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
laplace2d |
$-\nabla^2 u = 0$ | Dirichlet | Stationary |
laplace2d_mixed |
$-\nabla^2 u = 0$ | Mixed Dirichlet / Neumann | Stationary |
darcy2d |
$-\nabla \cdot (a(x)\nabla u) = f(x)$ | Dirichlet | Stationary |
heat2d |
$\partial u / \partial t - \alpha \nabla^2 u = 0$ | Time-dependent Dirichlet | Transient |
nonlinear_poisson2d |
$-\nabla \cdot (q(u)\nabla u) = 0$, $q(u) = 1 + u^2$ | Dirichlet | Stationary (nonlinear) |
PDE Details
Laplace (Dirichlet): The classical Laplace equation on random polygonal domains with randomized Dirichlet boundary values at each boundary node.
Laplace (Mixed): Same equation, but the boundary is split into contiguous Dirichlet and Neumann segments. With probability 0.2 the entire boundary is Dirichlet; otherwise a random contiguous portion is assigned Neumann conditions.
Darcy Flow: A variable-coefficient elliptic PDE. The coefficient field $a(x)$ and source term $f(x)$ are independently randomized per node ($a \in [0, 1]$, $f \in [-5, 0]$). Boundary values are scaled by a random factor in $[0.3, 1.0]$.
Heat Equation: Time-dependent diffusion solved with implicit Euler. Training uses 10 time steps ($T = 0.1$, $\Delta t = 0.01$) with random thermal diffusivity $\alpha \in [0.1, 1.0]$. Evaluation uses 50 time steps ($T = 0.5$) with fixed $\alpha = 1.0$.
Nonlinear Poisson: A nonlinear PDE with solution-dependent diffusivity $q(u) = 1 + u^2$, solved via Newton's method with GMRES and BoomerAMG preconditioning.
Training Data
Training data is generated on random simple polygons with varying numbers of vertices, triangulated using gmsh.
| Subset | Samples | Polygons × Batch | Vertices | Mesh Size |
|---|---|---|---|---|
laplace2d_simple |
20,000 | 2000 × 10 | 3–12 | 0.1 |
laplace2d_mixed_simple |
40,000 | 2000 × 20 | 3–12 | 0.1 |
darcy2d_simple |
40,000 | 2500 × 10 | 3–16 | 0.1 |
heat2d_simple |
80,000 | 1600 × 50 | 3–12 | 0.1 |
nonlinear_poisson2d_simple |
20,000 | 2000 × 10 | 3–12 | 0.1 |
Note: Each random polygon is reused for multiple samples (the "Batch" count) with different boundary conditions and/or coefficient fields. Coordinates are shifted by $[0.5, 0.5]$ to center domains around the origin.
Test Data
Simple Domain Test Sets
Test data on random polygons (same generation process as training, different samples):
| Subset | Samples |
|---|---|
laplace2d_simple |
2,500 |
laplace2d_mixed_simple |
4,000 |
darcy2d_simple |
2,500 |
heat2d_simple |
12,500 |
nonlinear_poisson2d_simple |
2,500 |
Evaluation Domain Test Sets
Test data on pre-defined complex geometries (fixed meshes), used to evaluate geometry generalization:
| Domain | Mesh File | Description |
|---|---|---|
| A (Schwarz) | A-schwarz.msh |
Overlapping disk and rectangle |
| B (Holes) | B-holes.msh |
Square with two interior holes |
| C (Bosch) | C-bosch.msh |
Disk with complex shape removed |
Each PDE is evaluated on each domain with 100 samples (10 for heat2d):
| Subset | Domain A | Domain B | Domain C |
|---|---|---|---|
laplace2d |
100 | 100 | 100 |
laplace2d_mixed |
100 | 100 | 100 |
darcy2d |
100 | 100 | 100 |
heat2d |
10 | 10 | 10 |
nonlinear_poisson2d |
100 | 100 | 100 |
Additional evaluation meshes (D-dolphin.msh, E-disk.msh, F-triangle.msh) are available for extended evaluation.
Data Format
All data is stored in Python pickle files (.pkl). Each file contains a list of samples. The format varies by PDE type:
Laplace2d / Laplace2d Mixed / Nonlinear Poisson2d
Each sample is a tuple: (sol, [bc])
| Array | Shape | Description |
|---|---|---|
sol |
(N, 3) |
Solution field: [x, y, u] at each mesh node |
bc |
(M, 4) |
Boundary conditions: [x, y, value, type] at each boundary node |
type = 0→ Dirichlet boundary condition ($u = \text{value}$)type = 1→ Neumann boundary condition ($\partial u / \partial n = \text{value}$)- For
laplace2dandnonlinear_poisson2d, all boundaries are Dirichlet (type = 0)
Darcy2d
Each sample is a tuple: (sol, [qf, bc])
| Array | Shape | Description |
|---|---|---|
sol |
(N, 3) |
Solution field: [x, y, u] |
qf |
(N, 4) |
Coefficient and source: [x, y, a, f] at each mesh node |
bc |
(M, 4) |
Boundary conditions: [x, y, u_D, 0] |
Heat2d
Each sample is a tuple: (sol, alpha, [bc])
| Array | Shape | Description |
|---|---|---|
sol |
(N, 2 + T) |
Solution trajectory: [x, y, u_0, u_1, ..., u_{T-1}] |
alpha |
scalar | Thermal diffusivity |
bc |
(M, 2 + T + 1) |
Boundary trajectory: [x, y, bc_0, ..., bc_{T-1}, 0] |
- Training: $T = 10$ time steps ($\Delta t = 0.01$)
- Evaluation: $T = 50$ time steps ($\Delta t = 0.01$)
Directory Structure
data/
├── 2d/
│ ├── laplace2d_simple_20000_train.pkl
│ ├── laplace2d_simple_2500_test.pkl
│ ├── laplace2d_schwarz_100_test.pkl
│ ├── laplace2d_holes_100_test.pkl
│ ├── laplace2d_bosch_100_test.pkl
│ ├── laplace2d_mixed_simple_40000_train.pkl
│ ├── laplace2d_mixed_schwarz_100_test.pkl
│ ├── laplace2d_mixed_holes_100_test.pkl
│ ├── laplace2d_mixed_bosch_100_test.pkl
│ ├── darcy2d_simple_40000_train.pkl
│ ├── darcy2d_simple_2500_test.pkl
│ ├── darcy2d_schwarz_100_test.pkl
│ ├── darcy2d_holes_100_test.pkl
│ ├── darcy2d_bosch_100_test.pkl
│ ├── heat2d_simple_100000_train.pkl
│ ├── heat2d_simple_12500_test.pkl
│ ├── heat2d_schwarz_10_test.pkl
│ ├── heat2d_holes_10_test.pkl
│ ├── heat2d_bosch_10_test.pkl
│ ├── nonlinear_poisson2d_simple_20000_train.pkl
│ ├── nonlinear_poisson2d_simple_2500_test.pkl
│ ├── nonlinear_poisson2d_schwarz_100_test.pkl
│ ├── nonlinear_poisson2d_holes_100_test.pkl
└── └── nonlinear_poisson2d_bosch_100_test.pkl
Quick Start
import pickle
# Load training data
with open("data/2d/laplace2d_simple_20000_train.pkl", "rb") as f:
datalist = pickle.load(f)
# Each sample is a tuple
sol, (bc,) = datalist[0]
# Solution field
x, y, u = sol[:, 0], sol[:, 1], sol[:, 2] # (N,) each
# Boundary conditions
bx, by, bc_val, bc_type = bc[:, 0], bc[:, 1], bc[:, 2], bc[:, 3]
print(f"Number of samples: {len(datalist)}")
print(f"Mesh nodes: {sol.shape[0]}, Boundary nodes: {bc.shape[0]}")
# Load Darcy flow data (includes coefficient field)
with open("data/2d/darcy2d_simple_40000_train.pkl", "rb") as f:
datalist = pickle.load(f)
sol, (qf, bc) = datalist[0]
# Coefficient field a(x) and source f(x)
a_coeff = qf[:, 2] # (N,)
f_source = qf[:, 3] # (N,)
# Load Heat equation data (time-dependent)
with open("data/2d/heat2d_simple_80000_train.pkl", "rb") as f:
datalist = pickle.load(f)
sol, alpha, (bc,) = datalist[0]
# Solution at each time step
x, y = sol[:, 0], sol[:, 1]
u_timesteps = sol[:, 2:] # (N, 10) — solution at 10 time steps
print(f"Thermal diffusivity: {alpha}")
Data Generation
Data is generated using FEniCSx (dolfinx) for the FEM solver and gmsh for mesh generation:
# Generate training data (parallelized across processes)
bash scripts/generate_data.sh laplace2d train 8
# Generate evaluation data on pre-defined domains
python data_generation/generate_eval.py --pde all --domain all
See the project repository for the full training and inference pipeline.
Intended Use
SNI-Dataset is designed to:
- Train and benchmark neural operators for PDE solving on irregular geometries.
- Evaluate geometry generalization — training on simple random polygons, testing on complex unseen domains.
- Support research on domain decomposition methods combined with learned operators.
- Provide a diverse set of PDE types (elliptic, parabolic, nonlinear) with varying boundary condition types.
Citation
If you use SNI-Dataset in your work, please cite:
@inproceedings{
title={Operator Learning with Domain Decomposition for Geometry Generalization in PDE Solving},
booktitle={International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR)},
year={2026},
url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.00510}
}
- Downloads last month
- 18