user stringlengths 3 28 | created_at timestamp[us]date 2020-04-01 09:48:12 2025-07-30 20:59:07 | body stringlengths 1 173k | issue_number int64 1 3.81k | __index_level_0__ int64 0 11.8k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
qgallouedec | 2024-12-13T16:51:33 | That's a good point! Feel free to open a PR to fix this. I don't think adding a unittest for this is relevant. If possible, add plots (eg, with wandb) before/after to ensure that we aren't introducing a regression | 2,468 | 200 |
zhc7 | 2024-12-13T17:17:59 | Ofcourse!
here's a graph for the same training with and without the modification. You can see the pink line is a lot more smoother. Especially the accuracy graph. My `per_device_batch_size` is 2 so the accuracy per device can on... | 2,468 | 201 |
qgallouedec | 2024-12-13T17:34:35 | Perfect! | 2,468 | 202 |
HuggingFaceDocBuilderDev | 2024-12-12T14:04:44 | The docs for this PR live [here](https://moon-ci-docs.huggingface.co/docs/trl/pr_2467). All of your documentation changes will be reflected on that endpoint. The docs are available until 30 days after the last update. | 2,467 | 203 |
qgallouedec | 2024-12-13T17:52:47 | That's very interesting! It would be a nice improvement.
If you want to tackle this problem, you should be aware that packing will be implemented differently (in a simpler way) in the near future, see #2405. You should branch from there. | 2,466 | 204 |
qgallouedec | 2024-12-12T10:44:50 | First, SAC is designed for continuous action spaces, whereas NLP tasks involve discrete token outputs. (A discrete variant of SAC exists though.)
Second, SAC lacks a mechanism to constrain the policy from deviating too far from the initial model. PPO, on the other hand, explicitly limits policy updates, which is cru... | 2,465 | 205 |
AMindToThink | 2024-12-13T21:11:39 | Thank you for the response.
The [RLOO trainer](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2402.14740) also lacks PPO's clipping mechanism that constrains the policy from deviating too far from the previous policy. [It turns out](https://huggingface.co/blog/putting_rl_back_in_rlhf_with_rloo) that for RLHF on pretrained language models, t... | 2,465 | 206 |
qgallouedec | 2024-12-13T22:13:21 | > lacks PPO's clipping mechanism that constrains the policy from deviating too far from the previous policy
There is a KL term though
> I don't see why a KL divergence term with a reference policy cannot be included into the SAC loss function.
I guess you can, it's just that in its classic formulation, the SAC... | 2,465 | 207 |
haimianxing | 2025-01-15T17:13:58 | I also encountered this error.
Traceback (most recent call last): ... | 2,464 | 208 |
HuggingFaceDocBuilderDev | 2024-12-11T20:08:30 | The docs for this PR live [here](https://moon-ci-docs.huggingface.co/docs/trl/pr_2463). All of your documentation changes will be reflected on that endpoint. The docs are available until 30 days after the last update. | 2,463 | 209 |
qgallouedec | 2024-12-12T11:25:31 | Thanks @kashif! | 2,463 | 210 |
qgallouedec | 2024-12-11T15:50:18 | Looks good, feel free to mark it ready for review when it's ready :) | 2,462 | 211 |
yaricom | 2024-12-12T17:24:11 | @qgallouedec Hi, Quentin! I can see that there are some trainer implementations that do logging of tabular data as `wandb.Table` using `Trainer.log()` method rather than using corresponding method of WandB API.
For example:
```Python
class DPOTrainer(Trainer):
......
def evaluation_loop(...)
... | 2,462 | 212 |
qgallouedec | 2024-12-12T20:50:16 | Hey thanks for working on this.
Actually, we need to remove all these logging part in favor of [LogCompletionsCallback](https://huggingface.co/docs/trl/callbacks#trl.LogCompletionsCallback)
The best way is probably to make this callback compatible with comet | 2,462 | 213 |
yaricom | 2024-12-13T14:37:42 | @qgallouedec Thank you for quick response. I noticed that `LogCompletionsCallback` is a subclass of `WandbCallback`, which requires the `wandb` module to be present; otherwise, an exception is raised.
It seems a bit out of place to leave this inheritance unchanged and simply add Comet integration to this callback. T... | 2,462 | 214 |
qgallouedec | 2024-12-13T17:38:35 | > It is possible to change `LogCompletionsCallback` inheritance to use `TrainerCallback` as superclass and then implement both integrations: wandb and Comet.
>
> What do you think?
Yes, I think your suggestion makes sense. Would you like to make it as part of this PR? | 2,462 | 215 |
yaricom | 2024-12-13T17:46:47 | I think it would be better to have another PR for `LogCompletionsCallback` changes to keep things more granular. | 2,462 | 216 |
qgallouedec | 2024-12-13T18:10:36 | LGTM, waiting https://github.com/huggingface/trl/pull/2462#discussion_r1884306215 to be addressed then I'll approve & merge. Thanks! | 2,462 | 217 |
HuggingFaceDocBuilderDev | 2024-12-13T18:14:15 | The docs for this PR live [here](https://moon-ci-docs.huggingface.co/docs/trl/pr_2462). All of your documentation changes will be reflected on that endpoint. The docs are available until 30 days after the last update. | 2,462 | 218 |
qgallouedec | 2024-12-11T15:04:05 | ☄️ | 2,461 | 219 |
qgallouedec | 2024-12-11T14:22:57 | The dataset is not loaded in RAM (only the current batch).
The training should be rather light in terms of RAM, as the weights and gradient are on the GPU. You'll still need enough RAM to load the model though.
When I run the experiment, I see that it requires less than 2GB of RAM.
| 2,460 | 220 |
Kallinteris-Andreas | 2024-12-11T14:30:09 | What CPU do you have (exact model)
and does DRAM usage explode when you run `CUDA_VISIBLE_DEVICES="" python test.py`
by current best guess is that it is a BF16 related issue (as my r5 4600h does not natively support it, probably off though) | 2,460 | 221 |
qgallouedec | 2024-12-11T14:45:57 | ```
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 79
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU @ 2.20GHz
stepping : 0
microcode : 0xffffffff
cpu MHz : 2199.998
cache size : 56320 KB
physical id : 0
siblings : 2
core id : 0
cpu cores : 1
apicid : 0
initial apicid : 0
fpu : yes
fpu_exception... | 2,460 | 222 |
Kallinteris-Andreas | 2024-12-11T14:47:30 | GPU does not work for me (works for my other RL projects)
```sh
$ PYTORCH_CUDA_ALLOC_CONF=expandable_segments:True py test.py
[2024-12-11 16:34:26,123] [INFO] [real_accelerator.py:219:get_accelerator] Setting ds_accelerator to cuda (auto detect)
No ROCm runtime is found, using ROCM_HOME='/opt/rocm'
0%| ... | 2,460 | 223 |
qgallouedec | 2024-12-11T14:59:11 | WDYM it doesn't work? It seems to work from the traceback.
I can see that your device only have 3.63 GiB, which is not enough to run the example. With `max_seq_length=128` you'll need around 12GB
 | 2,460 | 224 |
Kallinteris-Andreas | 2024-12-11T15:27:51 | Here is the dram usage per value of `max_seq_lenght`
max_seq_length -> max RAM usage observed (rounded up)
4 -> 10GB DRAM
32 -> 9GB DRAM
128 -> 11GB DRAM
512 -> 18GB DRAM
1024 (default) -> 32GB+ DRAM
using `max_seq_length=128` seems to require 28 hours on my CPU which is an improvement from not running at al... | 2,460 | 225 |
qgallouedec | 2024-12-11T15:37:44 | > I am assuming it limits the context length used during fine-tuning
Yes, that's what it does.
> mentions something about ConstantLengthDataset but I have not found it what it is.
This is a special dataset setting where all data have the same length. Not relevant for this issue though | 2,460 | 226 |
Kallinteris-Andreas | 2024-12-12T01:29:36 | How much time does it take to run this simple example on your hardware?
```py
from trl import SFTConfig, SFTTrainer
from datasets import load_dataset
dataset = load_dataset("trl-lib/Capybara", split="train")
training_args = SFTConfig(output_dir="Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B-SFT", max_seq_length=128)
trainer = SFTTrainer... | 2,460 | 227 |
Kallinteris-Andreas | 2024-12-16T10:23:40 | Closing, as it appears to be the natural requirement of SFT | 2,460 | 228 |
qgallouedec | 2024-12-13T22:16:30 | Thanks for this suggestion.
Can you quantify the speedup?
Any idea how to properly set the gradient checkpointing configurations?
Can we reproduce the speedup with a very simple code example?
| 2,459 | 229 |
qgallouedec | 2024-12-11T17:10:04 | Hey, thanks for contributing!
Is it really a loss type? It seems to me that it can be combined with any loss type, no?
What about having a new arg in `DPOConfig`? maybe `length_normalize`?
Also, I'd add a test for this | 2,458 | 230 |
HuggingFaceDocBuilderDev | 2024-12-10T16:14:50 | The docs for this PR live [here](https://moon-ci-docs.huggingface.co/docs/trl/pr_2457). All of your documentation changes will be reflected on that endpoint. The docs are available until 30 days after the last update. | 2,457 | 231 |
qgallouedec | 2024-12-10T17:54:12 | This is an interesting finding! ~I suspect it's related to https://github.com/huggingface/trl/issues/2175~. I'm investigating. | 2,456 | 232 |
qgallouedec | 2024-12-10T18:54:04 | The issue arises from how the accelerator is configured in [`create_accelerator_and_postprocess`](https://github.com/huggingface/transformers/blob/91b8ab18b778ae9e2f8191866e018cd1dc7097be/src/transformers/trainer.py#L4990).
To set the number of gradient accumulation steps, users can either:
1. Specify `num_steps` i... | 2,456 | 233 |
muellerzr | 2024-12-11T02:52:48 | Correct, that's not what we want to do because with the fix to how we calculate the number of items in the batch, the losses will not align and things will be off, so we *don't* divide the loss by accumulation steps if we know that value. I'd need to play with this a bit as I'm not 100% sure if we can just modify the g... | 2,456 | 234 |
AIR-hl | 2024-12-11T03:10:34 | > The issue arises from how the accelerator is configured in [`create_accelerator_and_postprocess`](https://github.com/huggingface/transformers/blob/91b8ab18b778ae9e2f8191866e018cd1dc7097be/src/transformers/trainer.py#L4990).
@qgallouedec I have a new question that if the problem arises from [create_accelerator_and_... | 2,456 | 235 |
qgallouedec | 2024-12-11T10:21:00 | > @qgallouedec I have a new question that if the problem arises from [create_accelerator_and_postprocess](https://github.com/huggingface/transformers/blob/91b8ab18b778ae9e2f8191866e018cd1dc7097be/src/transformers/trainer.py#L4990) in `transformers.Trainer`, why `trl.SFTTrainer`'s behavior is normal, but `trl.DPOTrainer... | 2,456 | 236 |
qgallouedec | 2024-12-11T10:41:00 | I may have found the solution: https://github.com/huggingface/transformers/pull/35207
Running some experiments... | 2,456 | 237 |
qgallouedec | 2024-12-11T11:12:53 | ## Does it solve the issue?
### Before the fix
same effective batch size (32)
- grad accumulation = 32 / batch_size = 1
- grad accumulation = 8 / batch_size = 4
We can see here that the gra... | 2,456 | 238 |
AIR-hl | 2024-12-11T13:01:32 | @qgallouedec Thanks for ur work! So this bug actually only affects the reported logs and not the training results, right? ：）
| 2,456 | 239 |
qgallouedec | 2024-12-11T13:03:18 | That's what the results suggest yes | 2,456 | 240 |
qgallouedec | 2024-12-11T13:25:54 | Leaving the issue open until https://github.com/huggingface/transformers/pull/35207 is properly merged | 2,456 | 241 |
August-murr | 2024-12-10T09:29:57 | @qgallouedec how's everything so far?
Is there anything you'd like me to change? | 2,455 | 242 |
qgallouedec | 2024-12-10T09:38:57 | Thanks @August-murr for this PR!
As mentioned in this [comment](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/issues/2429#issuecomment-2515244907), I think it would be better to start by only adding this feature to the functions of `trl/data_utils.py` and check that everything works as expected, without adding it to any traine... | 2,455 | 243 |
qgallouedec | 2024-12-10T11:34:47 | Looks good! We just need to update the docstrings of the functions and add some unittests | 2,455 | 244 |
August-murr | 2024-12-11T11:58:34 | I'm assuming we should also integrate the functions from `data_utils.py` into all the trainers, correct? | 2,455 | 245 |
qgallouedec | 2024-12-11T12:12:44 | > I'm assuming we should also integrate the functions from `data_utils.py` into all the trainers, correct?
Indeed, but we'll do that in follow-up PR. I think it's the best way to go | 2,455 | 246 |
HuggingFaceDocBuilderDev | 2024-12-11T12:21:37 | The docs for this PR live [here](https://moon-ci-docs.huggingface.co/docs/trl/pr_2455). All of your documentation changes will be reflected on that endpoint. The docs are available until 30 days after the last update. | 2,455 | 247 |
August-murr | 2024-12-11T19:09:33 | @qgallouedec
let me know if there is anything else I need to do. | 2,455 | 248 |
qgallouedec | 2024-12-11T21:44:24 | Looks good to me! Just one munir comment | 2,455 | 249 |
qgallouedec | 2024-12-12T15:46:38 | ```python
from transformers import AutoProcessor
from trl import apply_chat_template
tokenizer = AutoProcessor.from_pretrained("trl-internal-testing/tiny-LlamaForCausalLM-3.2")
# Define dummy test tools
def get_current_temperature(location: str):
"""
Gets the temperature at a given location.
A... | 2,455 | 250 |
HuggingFaceDocBuilderDev | 2024-12-09T17:55:56 | The docs for this PR live [here](https://moon-ci-docs.huggingface.co/docs/trl/pr_2454). All of your documentation changes will be reflected on that endpoint. The docs are available until 30 days after the last update. | 2,454 | 251 |
kashif | 2024-12-09T13:30:15 | @NINGBENZHE do you know where in the code the issue is occurring? | 2,453 | 252 |
NINGBENZHE | 2024-12-09T14:09:34 | > @NINGBENZHE do you know where in the code the issue is occurring?
I haven't found the issue yet, but after making the modifications, the critic's loss is functioning normally, and the optimizer's functionality has been restored. | 2,453 | 253 |
kashif | 2024-12-09T14:10:58 | ok let me try to pin-point the issue... and perhaps try to add a failing test? | 2,453 | 254 |
NINGBENZHE | 2024-12-09T14:23:17 | > ok let me try to pin-point the issue... and perhaps try to add a failing test?
You can repeat the same data and observe the critic's loss; it remains unchanged.
| 2,453 | 255 |
NINGBENZHE | 2024-12-09T14:24:38 | I found that the issue might have been introduced by this PR.
https://github.com/huggingface/trl/commit/16fa13ce728e537a91742571b0c4824fb3a98a30 | 2,453 | 256 |
HuggingFaceDocBuilderDev | 2024-12-09T14:44:23 | The docs for this PR live [here](https://moon-ci-docs.huggingface.co/docs/trl/pr_2453). All of your documentation changes will be reflected on that endpoint. The docs are available until 30 days after the last update. | 2,453 | 257 |
kashif | 2024-12-09T14:47:50 | @NINGBENZHE can you kindly run `make precommit` in the root dir to fix the formatting? | 2,453 | 258 |
NINGBENZHE | 2024-12-10T01:10:44 | > @NINGBENZHE can you kindly run `make precommit` in the root dir to fix the formatting?
I made the submission directly on the web, without using local Git, and only modified the parameter names, so it should not have introduced any new formatting issues. Can you force the merge? | 2,453 | 259 |
kashif | 2024-12-12T10:45:09 | closing as these changes have been merged into the PR #2463 | 2,453 | 260 |
asparius | 2024-12-10T14:08:59 | You have two gpus, but you only use it 1 in your accelerate config. You could also use deepspeed to further decrease the memory footprint. Lastly, keep per_device_train_batch_size as low as possible, instead increase gradient_accumulation step. | 2,452 | 261 |
gp-1108 | 2024-12-12T18:20:59 | Hi @asparius, thank you for the suggestions. As I am running this code on a computing cluster I am having some problems with [deepspeed](https://github.com/microsoft/DeepSpeed/issues/2772#issuecomment-2151669077). I would like to keep this issue open and get back once I have solved those issues | 2,452 | 262 |
qgallouedec | 2024-12-13T22:33:34 | It might come from your data. Do you have long sequences in your dataset?
It's very recommended to set these arguments: `max_length`, `max_prompt_length`, `max_completion_length` in the `DPOConfig`. Eg.
```python
DPOConfig(
...,
max_prompt_length=128,
max_completion_length=512,
)
``` | 2,452 | 263 |
asparius | 2024-12-14T00:46:01 | @gp-1108 I faced similar issues. I would recommend to check available modules in your cluster by a command like "module avail" and load a cuda installation by "module load", of course this is assuming you are in slurm env. If you dont have cuda in available modules, perhaps you could ask cluster admins to download it. ... | 2,452 | 264 |
gp-1108 | 2024-12-16T00:52:13 | Hi all, I have finally fixed all of the CUDA issues with the computing cluster 😮💨.
However, I did not fix the original issue. I am still running OOM even after using two full A40s.
I have tweaked both the script and the accelerate config so I will leave them below (I hope everything is setup as it should be).
... | 2,452 | 265 |
gp-1108 | 2024-12-20T12:02:25 | Hi, I have solved the issue finally and I am going to leave it here for the posterity.
The issue lay mainly in two things:
1. **Some samples were too long**
2. **The PEFT configuration was not working**
**MANAGING SAMPLE LENGTH**:
I plotted the lengths across a couple of metrics:
![image](https://github.com/u... | 2,452 | 266 |
Kallinteris-Andreas | 2024-12-08T23:00:17 | What is the reason that your model is not a `torch.nn.Module`, my first reaction would be that you are doing something wrong, unless you provide a detailed explanation as to why
can you convert your model to a `torch.nn.Module`?
but if you have a good reason for a custom reward model class, you would have to modi... | 2,451 | 267 |
hwhyyds | 2024-12-09T06:30:26 | In my code, I have trained a reward model with three outputs was in a format similar to '{"type1": 1, "type2": -1, "type3": 0}', which is different from the traditional output | 2,451 | 268 |
asparius | 2024-12-10T14:02:16 | > In my code, I have trained a reward model with three outputs was in a format similar to '{"type1": 1, "type2": -1, "type3": 0}', which is different from the traditional output
I believe you are doing some sort of classification, so you could still have nn-based module for classification part and then map its resu... | 2,451 | 269 |
hwhyyds | 2024-12-16T10:58:18 | Such as my scores from GPT-4o, can't be used by nn-based module | 2,451 | 270 |
kashif | 2024-12-11T12:31:48 | thanks @NIL-zhuang great catch! | 2,450 | 271 |
HuggingFaceDocBuilderDev | 2024-12-11T12:37:37 | The docs for this PR live [here](https://moon-ci-docs.huggingface.co/docs/trl/pr_2450). All of your documentation changes will be reflected on that endpoint. The docs are available until 30 days after the last update. | 2,450 | 272 |
qgallouedec | 2024-12-11T12:45:14 | Do we test this collator somewhere? | 2,450 | 273 |
kashif | 2024-12-11T12:50:49 | we do test it.. but more for the labels rather than the content of the ids... let me see if i can add a failing test | 2,450 | 274 |
kashif | 2024-12-11T13:18:21 | @qgallouedec added failng tests | 2,450 | 275 |
asparius | 2024-12-10T14:23:57 | It is the entropy of the generated sequence by the policy given the prompt. Do you intend to measure another thing? | 2,448 | 276 |
hubstrauss | 2024-12-10T15:36:05 | Oh I see, my bad - as the tokens were sampled from the model, you can get a sample based estimation of entropy. Thanks !
So but then, why is the default value of INVALID_LOGPROB set to 1 ? When computing `-logprobs`, these masked tokens contribute -1 each to the sum ? | 2,448 | 277 |
asparius | 2024-12-10T18:54:38 | This was already mentioned in #2281. | 2,448 | 278 |
HuggingFaceDocBuilderDev | 2024-12-06T12:33:48 | The docs for this PR live [here](https://moon-ci-docs.huggingface.co/docs/trl/pr_2447). All of your documentation changes will be reflected on that endpoint. The docs are available until 30 days after the last update. | 2,447 | 279 |
anhuong | 2024-12-06T17:30:29 | Does this also need to be updated in the [requirements.txt](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/requirements.txt#L4)? as it still shows `transformers>=4.46.0` | 2,447 | 280 |
kashif | 2024-12-06T18:09:57 | @anhuong I believe the `requirements.txt` is used by the CI and the issue is fixed in the main branch... | 2,447 | 281 |
qgallouedec | 2024-12-06T12:24:20 | Thanks for reporting. A patch release is coming asap.
In the meantime, downagrading transformers to 4.46 should work.
```
pip install transformers==4.46
```
Related to https://github.com/huggingface/trl/pull/2381
Keeping the issue open until the release | 2,445 | 282 |
gp-1108 | 2024-12-06T14:59:42 | Thanks @qgallouedec, downgrading to the specified version worked! | 2,445 | 283 |
qgallouedec | 2024-12-13T22:36:16 | Solved with https://github.com/huggingface/trl/releases/tag/v0.12.2
```
pip install --upgrade trl
``` | 2,445 | 284 |
pspdada | 2024-12-20T04:02:00 | > Solved with https://github.com/huggingface/trl/releases/tag/v0.12.2
>
> ```
> pip install --upgrade trl
> ```
Hello, I've noticed that the issue with the latest version of trl==0.13.0 has resurfaced. Since in this version, the requirement has reverted to "transformers>=4.46.0", this problem has reappeared. Co... | 2,445 | 285 |
qgallouedec | 2024-12-20T10:29:41 | This issue should be fixed in 0.13. Can you share your system info? (`trl env`) | 2,445 | 286 |
pspdada | 2024-12-20T11:56:57 | > This issue should be fixed in 0.13. Can you share your system info? (`trl env`)
I understand what happened with the changes in this part; it was due to an error in my implementation. I apologize for the disturbance. | 2,445 | 287 |
melissamao | 2024-12-29T13:22:04 | Same questions. | 2,444 | 288 |
HuggingFaceDocBuilderDev | 2024-12-05T19:15:12 | The docs for this PR live [here](https://moon-ci-docs.huggingface.co/docs/trl/pr_2443). All of your documentation changes will be reflected on that endpoint. The docs are available until 30 days after the last update. | 2,443 | 289 |
HuggingFaceDocBuilderDev | 2024-12-05T18:54:01 | The docs for this PR live [here](https://moon-ci-docs.huggingface.co/docs/trl/pr_2442). All of your documentation changes will be reflected on that endpoint. The docs are available until 30 days after the last update. | 2,442 | 290 |
HuggingFaceDocBuilderDev | 2024-12-05T15:00:27 | The docs for this PR live [here](https://moon-ci-docs.huggingface.co/docs/trl/pr_2441). All of your documentation changes will be reflected on that endpoint. The docs are available until 30 days after the last update. | 2,441 | 291 |
qgallouedec | 2024-12-06T09:08:45 | Thanks! can you approve? | 2,441 | 292 |
HuggingFaceDocBuilderDev | 2024-12-05T14:24:42 | The docs for this PR live [here](https://moon-ci-docs.huggingface.co/docs/trl/pr_2440). All of your documentation changes will be reflected on that endpoint. The docs are available until 30 days after the last update. | 2,440 | 293 |
qgallouedec | 2024-12-04T18:15:42 | LGTM, thanks :) | 2,439 | 294 |
dame-cell | 2024-12-10T15:19:45 | not really done yet but for now
everything seems to be working
if padding_free is set to True the trainer will not pad and also when padding_free =True attention_mask will not be used
for now here are some task to be done :
- [x] Ensure when padding_Free =True the trainer will not pad
- [x] Ensure that... | 2,437 | 295 |
dame-cell | 2024-12-11T13:02:27 | most of the stuff is done just some small stuff left like dealing with list and converting to tensor | 2,437 | 296 |
dame-cell | 2024-12-11T14:43:58 | Hey @osanseviero,
The main idea for using padding_free is mostly in place now, but there are still a few things that need to be done. It would be awesome if you could take a look at the code and let me know if there's anything else I should address or add.
I've made it so the user can directly do this
```pyt... | 2,437 | 297 |
dame-cell | 2024-12-13T12:21:52 | @osanseviero I think this fixes it sorry for the small mistake I have been making , thanks for your patience | 2,437 | 298 |
dame-cell | 2024-12-13T14:44:55 | still more work to be done not really ready yet
| 2,437 | 299 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.