raw_dataset_id int64 0 15 | answer stringclasses 103
values | inputs stringlengths 43 59.7k | prompt_template stringclasses 160
values | prompt stringlengths 46 29.9k | task stringclasses 160
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
6 | suggestive | {'index': 8.0, 'text': 'The mark "KitchenAid" for kitchen tools.'} | A mark is generic if it is the common name for the product. A mark is descriptive if it describes a purpose, nature, or attribute of the product. A mark is suggestive if it suggests or implies a quality or characteristic of the product. A mark is arbitrary if it is a real English word that has no relation to the produc... | A mark is generic if it is the common name for the product. A mark is descriptive if it describes a purpose, nature, or attribute of the product. A mark is suggestive if it suggests or implies a quality or characteristic of the product. A mark is arbitrary if it is a real English word that has no relation to the produc... | abercrombie |
3 | arbitrary | {'index': '3', 'text': 'The mark "Virgin" for wireless communications.'} | A mark is generic if it is the common name for the product. A mark is descriptive if it describes a purpose, nature, or attribute of the product. A mark is suggestive if it suggests or implies a quality or characteristic of the product. A mark is arbitrary if it is a real English word that has no relation to the produc... | A mark is generic if it is the common name for the product. A mark is descriptive if it describes a purpose, nature, or attribute of the product. A mark is suggestive if it suggests or implies a quality or characteristic of the product. A mark is arbitrary if it is a real English word that has no relation to the produc... | abercrombie |
7 | arbitrary | {'index': 9.0, 'text': 'The mark "Dove" for body care products.'} | A mark is generic if it is the common name for the product. A mark is descriptive if it describes a purpose, nature, or attribute of the product. A mark is suggestive if it suggests or implies a quality or characteristic of the product. A mark is arbitrary if it is a real English word that has no relation to the produc... | A mark is generic if it is the common name for the product. A mark is descriptive if it describes a purpose, nature, or attribute of the product. A mark is suggestive if it suggests or implies a quality or characteristic of the product. A mark is arbitrary if it is a real English word that has no relation to the produc... | abercrombie |
4 | fanciful | {'index': '4', 'text': 'The mark "Aswelly" for a taxi service.'} | A mark is generic if it is the common name for the product. A mark is descriptive if it describes a purpose, nature, or attribute of the product. A mark is suggestive if it suggests or implies a quality or characteristic of the product. A mark is arbitrary if it is a real English word that has no relation to the produc... | A mark is generic if it is the common name for the product. A mark is descriptive if it describes a purpose, nature, or attribute of the product. A mark is suggestive if it suggests or implies a quality or characteristic of the product. A mark is arbitrary if it is a real English word that has no relation to the produc... | abercrombie |
6 | suggestive | {'index': 8.0, 'text': 'The mark "KitchenAid" for kitchen tools.'} | A mark is generic if it is the common name for the product. A mark is descriptive if it describes a purpose, nature, or attribute of the product. A mark is suggestive if it suggests or implies a quality or characteristic of the product. A mark is arbitrary if it is a real English word that has no relation to the produc... | A mark is generic if it is the common name for the product. A mark is descriptive if it describes a purpose, nature, or attribute of the product. A mark is suggestive if it suggests or implies a quality or characteristic of the product. A mark is arbitrary if it is a real English word that has no relation to the produc... | abercrombie |
9 | generic | {'index': 6.0, 'text': 'The mark "Dry Ice" for solid carbon dioxide. https://www.mandourlaw.com/trademark-examples/'} | A mark is generic if it is the common name for the product. A mark is descriptive if it describes a purpose, nature, or attribute of the product. A mark is suggestive if it suggests or implies a quality or characteristic of the product. A mark is arbitrary if it is a real English word that has no relation to the produc... | A mark is generic if it is the common name for the product. A mark is descriptive if it describes a purpose, nature, or attribute of the product. A mark is suggestive if it suggests or implies a quality or characteristic of the product. A mark is arbitrary if it is a real English word that has no relation to the produc... | abercrombie |
2 | suggestive | {'index': '2', 'text': 'The mark "Caress" for body soap.'} | A mark is generic if it is the common name for the product. A mark is descriptive if it describes a purpose, nature, or attribute of the product. A mark is suggestive if it suggests or implies a quality or characteristic of the product. A mark is arbitrary if it is a real English word that has no relation to the produc... | A mark is generic if it is the common name for the product. A mark is descriptive if it describes a purpose, nature, or attribute of the product. A mark is suggestive if it suggests or implies a quality or characteristic of the product. A mark is arbitrary if it is a real English word that has no relation to the produc... | abercrombie |
6 | suggestive | {'index': 8.0, 'text': 'The mark "KitchenAid" for kitchen tools.'} | A mark is generic if it is the common name for the product. A mark is descriptive if it describes a purpose, nature, or attribute of the product. A mark is suggestive if it suggests or implies a quality or characteristic of the product. A mark is arbitrary if it is a real English word that has no relation to the produc... | A mark is generic if it is the common name for the product. A mark is descriptive if it describes a purpose, nature, or attribute of the product. A mark is suggestive if it suggests or implies a quality or characteristic of the product. A mark is arbitrary if it is a real English word that has no relation to the produc... | abercrombie |
7 | arbitrary | {'index': 9.0, 'text': 'The mark "Dove" for body care products.'} | A mark is generic if it is the common name for the product. A mark is descriptive if it describes a purpose, nature, or attribute of the product. A mark is suggestive if it suggests or implies a quality or characteristic of the product. A mark is arbitrary if it is a real English word that has no relation to the produc... | A mark is generic if it is the common name for the product. A mark is descriptive if it describes a purpose, nature, or attribute of the product. A mark is suggestive if it suggests or implies a quality or characteristic of the product. A mark is arbitrary if it is a real English word that has no relation to the produc... | abercrombie |
4 | fanciful | {'index': '4', 'text': 'The mark "Aswelly" for a taxi service.'} | A mark is generic if it is the common name for the product. A mark is descriptive if it describes a purpose, nature, or attribute of the product. A mark is suggestive if it suggests or implies a quality or characteristic of the product. A mark is arbitrary if it is a real English word that has no relation to the produc... | A mark is generic if it is the common name for the product. A mark is descriptive if it describes a purpose, nature, or attribute of the product. A mark is suggestive if it suggests or implies a quality or characteristic of the product. A mark is arbitrary if it is a real English word that has no relation to the produc... | abercrombie |
3 | arbitrary | {'index': '3', 'text': 'The mark "Virgin" for wireless communications.'} | A mark is generic if it is the common name for the product. A mark is descriptive if it describes a purpose, nature, or attribute of the product. A mark is suggestive if it suggests or implies a quality or characteristic of the product. A mark is arbitrary if it is a real English word that has no relation to the produc... | A mark is generic if it is the common name for the product. A mark is descriptive if it describes a purpose, nature, or attribute of the product. A mark is suggestive if it suggests or implies a quality or characteristic of the product. A mark is arbitrary if it is a real English word that has no relation to the produc... | abercrombie |
7 | arbitrary | {'index': 9.0, 'text': 'The mark "Dove" for body care products.'} | A mark is generic if it is the common name for the product. A mark is descriptive if it describes a purpose, nature, or attribute of the product. A mark is suggestive if it suggests or implies a quality or characteristic of the product. A mark is arbitrary if it is a real English word that has no relation to the produc... | A mark is generic if it is the common name for the product. A mark is descriptive if it describes a purpose, nature, or attribute of the product. A mark is suggestive if it suggests or implies a quality or characteristic of the product. A mark is arbitrary if it is a real English word that has no relation to the produc... | abercrombie |
7 | arbitrary | {'index': 9.0, 'text': 'The mark "Dove" for body care products.'} | A mark is generic if it is the common name for the product. A mark is descriptive if it describes a purpose, nature, or attribute of the product. A mark is suggestive if it suggests or implies a quality or characteristic of the product. A mark is arbitrary if it is a real English word that has no relation to the produc... | A mark is generic if it is the common name for the product. A mark is descriptive if it describes a purpose, nature, or attribute of the product. A mark is suggestive if it suggests or implies a quality or characteristic of the product. A mark is arbitrary if it is a real English word that has no relation to the produc... | abercrombie |
2 | suggestive | {'index': '2', 'text': 'The mark "Caress" for body soap.'} | A mark is generic if it is the common name for the product. A mark is descriptive if it describes a purpose, nature, or attribute of the product. A mark is suggestive if it suggests or implies a quality or characteristic of the product. A mark is arbitrary if it is a real English word that has no relation to the produc... | A mark is generic if it is the common name for the product. A mark is descriptive if it describes a purpose, nature, or attribute of the product. A mark is suggestive if it suggests or implies a quality or characteristic of the product. A mark is arbitrary if it is a real English word that has no relation to the produc... | abercrombie |
5 | descriptive | {'index': 7.0, 'text': 'The mark "American Airlines" for air transport of passengers and freight.'} | A mark is generic if it is the common name for the product. A mark is descriptive if it describes a purpose, nature, or attribute of the product. A mark is suggestive if it suggests or implies a quality or characteristic of the product. A mark is arbitrary if it is a real English word that has no relation to the produc... | A mark is generic if it is the common name for the product. A mark is descriptive if it describes a purpose, nature, or attribute of the product. A mark is suggestive if it suggests or implies a quality or characteristic of the product. A mark is arbitrary if it is a real English word that has no relation to the produc... | abercrombie |
4 | fanciful | {'index': '4', 'text': 'The mark "Aswelly" for a taxi service.'} | A mark is generic if it is the common name for the product. A mark is descriptive if it describes a purpose, nature, or attribute of the product. A mark is suggestive if it suggests or implies a quality or characteristic of the product. A mark is arbitrary if it is a real English word that has no relation to the produc... | A mark is generic if it is the common name for the product. A mark is descriptive if it describes a purpose, nature, or attribute of the product. A mark is suggestive if it suggests or implies a quality or characteristic of the product. A mark is arbitrary if it is a real English word that has no relation to the produc... | abercrombie |
1 | descriptive | {'index': '1', 'text': 'The mark "Tasty" for bread.'} | A mark is generic if it is the common name for the product. A mark is descriptive if it describes a purpose, nature, or attribute of the product. A mark is suggestive if it suggests or implies a quality or characteristic of the product. A mark is arbitrary if it is a real English word that has no relation to the produc... | A mark is generic if it is the common name for the product. A mark is descriptive if it describes a purpose, nature, or attribute of the product. A mark is suggestive if it suggests or implies a quality or characteristic of the product. A mark is arbitrary if it is a real English word that has no relation to the produc... | abercrombie |
7 | arbitrary | {'index': 9.0, 'text': 'The mark "Dove" for body care products.'} | A mark is generic if it is the common name for the product. A mark is descriptive if it describes a purpose, nature, or attribute of the product. A mark is suggestive if it suggests or implies a quality or characteristic of the product. A mark is arbitrary if it is a real English word that has no relation to the produc... | A mark is generic if it is the common name for the product. A mark is descriptive if it describes a purpose, nature, or attribute of the product. A mark is suggestive if it suggests or implies a quality or characteristic of the product. A mark is arbitrary if it is a real English word that has no relation to the produc... | abercrombie |
5 | descriptive | {'index': 7.0, 'text': 'The mark "American Airlines" for air transport of passengers and freight.'} | A mark is generic if it is the common name for the product. A mark is descriptive if it describes a purpose, nature, or attribute of the product. A mark is suggestive if it suggests or implies a quality or characteristic of the product. A mark is arbitrary if it is a real English word that has no relation to the produc... | A mark is generic if it is the common name for the product. A mark is descriptive if it describes a purpose, nature, or attribute of the product. A mark is suggestive if it suggests or implies a quality or characteristic of the product. A mark is arbitrary if it is a real English word that has no relation to the produc... | abercrombie |
1 | descriptive | {'index': '1', 'text': 'The mark "Tasty" for bread.'} | A mark is generic if it is the common name for the product. A mark is descriptive if it describes a purpose, nature, or attribute of the product. A mark is suggestive if it suggests or implies a quality or characteristic of the product. A mark is arbitrary if it is a real English word that has no relation to the produc... | A mark is generic if it is the common name for the product. A mark is descriptive if it describes a purpose, nature, or attribute of the product. A mark is suggestive if it suggests or implies a quality or characteristic of the product. A mark is arbitrary if it is a real English word that has no relation to the produc... | abercrombie |
4 | fanciful | {'index': '4', 'text': 'The mark "Aswelly" for a taxi service.'} | A mark is generic if it is the common name for the product. A mark is descriptive if it describes a purpose, nature, or attribute of the product. A mark is suggestive if it suggests or implies a quality or characteristic of the product. A mark is arbitrary if it is a real English word that has no relation to the produc... | A mark is generic if it is the common name for the product. A mark is descriptive if it describes a purpose, nature, or attribute of the product. A mark is suggestive if it suggests or implies a quality or characteristic of the product. A mark is arbitrary if it is a real English word that has no relation to the produc... | abercrombie |
0 | generic | {'index': '0', 'text': 'The mark "Ivory" for a product made of elephant tusks.'} | A mark is generic if it is the common name for the product. A mark is descriptive if it describes a purpose, nature, or attribute of the product. A mark is suggestive if it suggests or implies a quality or characteristic of the product. A mark is arbitrary if it is a real English word that has no relation to the produc... | A mark is generic if it is the common name for the product. A mark is descriptive if it describes a purpose, nature, or attribute of the product. A mark is suggestive if it suggests or implies a quality or characteristic of the product. A mark is arbitrary if it is a real English word that has no relation to the produc... | abercrombie |
9 | generic | {'index': 6.0, 'text': 'The mark "Dry Ice" for solid carbon dioxide. https://www.mandourlaw.com/trademark-examples/'} | A mark is generic if it is the common name for the product. A mark is descriptive if it describes a purpose, nature, or attribute of the product. A mark is suggestive if it suggests or implies a quality or characteristic of the product. A mark is arbitrary if it is a real English word that has no relation to the produc... | A mark is generic if it is the common name for the product. A mark is descriptive if it describes a purpose, nature, or attribute of the product. A mark is suggestive if it suggests or implies a quality or characteristic of the product. A mark is arbitrary if it is a real English word that has no relation to the produc... | abercrombie |
5 | descriptive | {'index': 7.0, 'text': 'The mark "American Airlines" for air transport of passengers and freight.'} | A mark is generic if it is the common name for the product. A mark is descriptive if it describes a purpose, nature, or attribute of the product. A mark is suggestive if it suggests or implies a quality or characteristic of the product. A mark is arbitrary if it is a real English word that has no relation to the produc... | A mark is generic if it is the common name for the product. A mark is descriptive if it describes a purpose, nature, or attribute of the product. A mark is suggestive if it suggests or implies a quality or characteristic of the product. A mark is arbitrary if it is a real English word that has no relation to the produc... | abercrombie |
8 | fanciful | {'index': 10.0, 'text': 'The mark "Pepsi" for soft drinks.'} | A mark is generic if it is the common name for the product. A mark is descriptive if it describes a purpose, nature, or attribute of the product. A mark is suggestive if it suggests or implies a quality or characteristic of the product. A mark is arbitrary if it is a real English word that has no relation to the produc... | A mark is generic if it is the common name for the product. A mark is descriptive if it describes a purpose, nature, or attribute of the product. A mark is suggestive if it suggests or implies a quality or characteristic of the product. A mark is arbitrary if it is a real English word that has no relation to the produc... | abercrombie |
0 | generic | {'index': '0', 'text': 'The mark "Ivory" for a product made of elephant tusks.'} | A mark is generic if it is the common name for the product. A mark is descriptive if it describes a purpose, nature, or attribute of the product. A mark is suggestive if it suggests or implies a quality or characteristic of the product. A mark is arbitrary if it is a real English word that has no relation to the produc... | A mark is generic if it is the common name for the product. A mark is descriptive if it describes a purpose, nature, or attribute of the product. A mark is suggestive if it suggests or implies a quality or characteristic of the product. A mark is arbitrary if it is a real English word that has no relation to the produc... | abercrombie |
9 | generic | {'index': 6.0, 'text': 'The mark "Dry Ice" for solid carbon dioxide. https://www.mandourlaw.com/trademark-examples/'} | A mark is generic if it is the common name for the product. A mark is descriptive if it describes a purpose, nature, or attribute of the product. A mark is suggestive if it suggests or implies a quality or characteristic of the product. A mark is arbitrary if it is a real English word that has no relation to the produc... | A mark is generic if it is the common name for the product. A mark is descriptive if it describes a purpose, nature, or attribute of the product. A mark is suggestive if it suggests or implies a quality or characteristic of the product. A mark is arbitrary if it is a real English word that has no relation to the produc... | abercrombie |
2 | suggestive | {'index': '2', 'text': 'The mark "Caress" for body soap.'} | A mark is generic if it is the common name for the product. A mark is descriptive if it describes a purpose, nature, or attribute of the product. A mark is suggestive if it suggests or implies a quality or characteristic of the product. A mark is arbitrary if it is a real English word that has no relation to the produc... | A mark is generic if it is the common name for the product. A mark is descriptive if it describes a purpose, nature, or attribute of the product. A mark is suggestive if it suggests or implies a quality or characteristic of the product. A mark is arbitrary if it is a real English word that has no relation to the produc... | abercrombie |
6 | suggestive | {'index': 8.0, 'text': 'The mark "KitchenAid" for kitchen tools.'} | A mark is generic if it is the common name for the product. A mark is descriptive if it describes a purpose, nature, or attribute of the product. A mark is suggestive if it suggests or implies a quality or characteristic of the product. A mark is arbitrary if it is a real English word that has no relation to the produc... | A mark is generic if it is the common name for the product. A mark is descriptive if it describes a purpose, nature, or attribute of the product. A mark is suggestive if it suggests or implies a quality or characteristic of the product. A mark is arbitrary if it is a real English word that has no relation to the produc... | abercrombie |
3 | arbitrary | {'index': '3', 'text': 'The mark "Virgin" for wireless communications.'} | A mark is generic if it is the common name for the product. A mark is descriptive if it describes a purpose, nature, or attribute of the product. A mark is suggestive if it suggests or implies a quality or characteristic of the product. A mark is arbitrary if it is a real English word that has no relation to the produc... | A mark is generic if it is the common name for the product. A mark is descriptive if it describes a purpose, nature, or attribute of the product. A mark is suggestive if it suggests or implies a quality or characteristic of the product. A mark is arbitrary if it is a real English word that has no relation to the produc... | abercrombie |
8 | fanciful | {'index': 10.0, 'text': 'The mark "Pepsi" for soft drinks.'} | A mark is generic if it is the common name for the product. A mark is descriptive if it describes a purpose, nature, or attribute of the product. A mark is suggestive if it suggests or implies a quality or characteristic of the product. A mark is arbitrary if it is a real English word that has no relation to the produc... | A mark is generic if it is the common name for the product. A mark is descriptive if it describes a purpose, nature, or attribute of the product. A mark is suggestive if it suggests or implies a quality or characteristic of the product. A mark is arbitrary if it is a real English word that has no relation to the produc... | abercrombie |
2 | suggestive | {'index': '2', 'text': 'The mark "Caress" for body soap.'} | A mark is generic if it is the common name for the product. A mark is descriptive if it describes a purpose, nature, or attribute of the product. A mark is suggestive if it suggests or implies a quality or characteristic of the product. A mark is arbitrary if it is a real English word that has no relation to the produc... | A mark is generic if it is the common name for the product. A mark is descriptive if it describes a purpose, nature, or attribute of the product. A mark is suggestive if it suggests or implies a quality or characteristic of the product. A mark is arbitrary if it is a real English word that has no relation to the produc... | abercrombie |
4 | fanciful | {'index': '4', 'text': 'The mark "Aswelly" for a taxi service.'} | A mark is generic if it is the common name for the product. A mark is descriptive if it describes a purpose, nature, or attribute of the product. A mark is suggestive if it suggests or implies a quality or characteristic of the product. A mark is arbitrary if it is a real English word that has no relation to the produc... | A mark is generic if it is the common name for the product. A mark is descriptive if it describes a purpose, nature, or attribute of the product. A mark is suggestive if it suggests or implies a quality or characteristic of the product. A mark is arbitrary if it is a real English word that has no relation to the produc... | abercrombie |
2 | suggestive | {'index': '2', 'text': 'The mark "Caress" for body soap.'} | A mark is generic if it is the common name for the product. A mark is descriptive if it describes a purpose, nature, or attribute of the product. A mark is suggestive if it suggests or implies a quality or characteristic of the product. A mark is arbitrary if it is a real English word that has no relation to the produc... | A mark is generic if it is the common name for the product. A mark is descriptive if it describes a purpose, nature, or attribute of the product. A mark is suggestive if it suggests or implies a quality or characteristic of the product. A mark is arbitrary if it is a real English word that has no relation to the produc... | abercrombie |
6 | suggestive | {'index': 8.0, 'text': 'The mark "KitchenAid" for kitchen tools.'} | A mark is generic if it is the common name for the product. A mark is descriptive if it describes a purpose, nature, or attribute of the product. A mark is suggestive if it suggests or implies a quality or characteristic of the product. A mark is arbitrary if it is a real English word that has no relation to the produc... | A mark is generic if it is the common name for the product. A mark is descriptive if it describes a purpose, nature, or attribute of the product. A mark is suggestive if it suggests or implies a quality or characteristic of the product. A mark is arbitrary if it is a real English word that has no relation to the produc... | abercrombie |
4 | fanciful | {'index': '4', 'text': 'The mark "Aswelly" for a taxi service.'} | A mark is generic if it is the common name for the product. A mark is descriptive if it describes a purpose, nature, or attribute of the product. A mark is suggestive if it suggests or implies a quality or characteristic of the product. A mark is arbitrary if it is a real English word that has no relation to the produc... | A mark is generic if it is the common name for the product. A mark is descriptive if it describes a purpose, nature, or attribute of the product. A mark is suggestive if it suggests or implies a quality or characteristic of the product. A mark is arbitrary if it is a real English word that has no relation to the produc... | abercrombie |
8 | fanciful | {'index': 10.0, 'text': 'The mark "Pepsi" for soft drinks.'} | A mark is generic if it is the common name for the product. A mark is descriptive if it describes a purpose, nature, or attribute of the product. A mark is suggestive if it suggests or implies a quality or characteristic of the product. A mark is arbitrary if it is a real English word that has no relation to the produc... | A mark is generic if it is the common name for the product. A mark is descriptive if it describes a purpose, nature, or attribute of the product. A mark is suggestive if it suggests or implies a quality or characteristic of the product. A mark is arbitrary if it is a real English word that has no relation to the produc... | abercrombie |
6 | suggestive | {'index': 8.0, 'text': 'The mark "KitchenAid" for kitchen tools.'} | A mark is generic if it is the common name for the product. A mark is descriptive if it describes a purpose, nature, or attribute of the product. A mark is suggestive if it suggests or implies a quality or characteristic of the product. A mark is arbitrary if it is a real English word that has no relation to the produc... | A mark is generic if it is the common name for the product. A mark is descriptive if it describes a purpose, nature, or attribute of the product. A mark is suggestive if it suggests or implies a quality or characteristic of the product. A mark is arbitrary if it is a real English word that has no relation to the produc... | abercrombie |
1 | descriptive | {'index': '1', 'text': 'The mark "Tasty" for bread.'} | A mark is generic if it is the common name for the product. A mark is descriptive if it describes a purpose, nature, or attribute of the product. A mark is suggestive if it suggests or implies a quality or characteristic of the product. A mark is arbitrary if it is a real English word that has no relation to the produc... | A mark is generic if it is the common name for the product. A mark is descriptive if it describes a purpose, nature, or attribute of the product. A mark is suggestive if it suggests or implies a quality or characteristic of the product. A mark is arbitrary if it is a real English word that has no relation to the produc... | abercrombie |
3 | arbitrary | {'index': '3', 'text': 'The mark "Virgin" for wireless communications.'} | A mark is generic if it is the common name for the product. A mark is descriptive if it describes a purpose, nature, or attribute of the product. A mark is suggestive if it suggests or implies a quality or characteristic of the product. A mark is arbitrary if it is a real English word that has no relation to the produc... | A mark is generic if it is the common name for the product. A mark is descriptive if it describes a purpose, nature, or attribute of the product. A mark is suggestive if it suggests or implies a quality or characteristic of the product. A mark is arbitrary if it is a real English word that has no relation to the produc... | abercrombie |
8 | fanciful | {'index': 10.0, 'text': 'The mark "Pepsi" for soft drinks.'} | A mark is generic if it is the common name for the product. A mark is descriptive if it describes a purpose, nature, or attribute of the product. A mark is suggestive if it suggests or implies a quality or characteristic of the product. A mark is arbitrary if it is a real English word that has no relation to the produc... | A mark is generic if it is the common name for the product. A mark is descriptive if it describes a purpose, nature, or attribute of the product. A mark is suggestive if it suggests or implies a quality or characteristic of the product. A mark is arbitrary if it is a real English word that has no relation to the produc... | abercrombie |
1 | descriptive | {'index': '1', 'text': 'The mark "Tasty" for bread.'} | A mark is generic if it is the common name for the product. A mark is descriptive if it describes a purpose, nature, or attribute of the product. A mark is suggestive if it suggests or implies a quality or characteristic of the product. A mark is arbitrary if it is a real English word that has no relation to the produc... | A mark is generic if it is the common name for the product. A mark is descriptive if it describes a purpose, nature, or attribute of the product. A mark is suggestive if it suggests or implies a quality or characteristic of the product. A mark is arbitrary if it is a real English word that has no relation to the produc... | abercrombie |
9 | generic | {'index': 6.0, 'text': 'The mark "Dry Ice" for solid carbon dioxide. https://www.mandourlaw.com/trademark-examples/'} | A mark is generic if it is the common name for the product. A mark is descriptive if it describes a purpose, nature, or attribute of the product. A mark is suggestive if it suggests or implies a quality or characteristic of the product. A mark is arbitrary if it is a real English word that has no relation to the produc... | A mark is generic if it is the common name for the product. A mark is descriptive if it describes a purpose, nature, or attribute of the product. A mark is suggestive if it suggests or implies a quality or characteristic of the product. A mark is arbitrary if it is a real English word that has no relation to the produc... | abercrombie |
8 | fanciful | {'index': 10.0, 'text': 'The mark "Pepsi" for soft drinks.'} | A mark is generic if it is the common name for the product. A mark is descriptive if it describes a purpose, nature, or attribute of the product. A mark is suggestive if it suggests or implies a quality or characteristic of the product. A mark is arbitrary if it is a real English word that has no relation to the produc... | A mark is generic if it is the common name for the product. A mark is descriptive if it describes a purpose, nature, or attribute of the product. A mark is suggestive if it suggests or implies a quality or characteristic of the product. A mark is arbitrary if it is a real English word that has no relation to the produc... | abercrombie |
9 | generic | {'index': 6.0, 'text': 'The mark "Dry Ice" for solid carbon dioxide. https://www.mandourlaw.com/trademark-examples/'} | A mark is generic if it is the common name for the product. A mark is descriptive if it describes a purpose, nature, or attribute of the product. A mark is suggestive if it suggests or implies a quality or characteristic of the product. A mark is arbitrary if it is a real English word that has no relation to the produc... | A mark is generic if it is the common name for the product. A mark is descriptive if it describes a purpose, nature, or attribute of the product. A mark is suggestive if it suggests or implies a quality or characteristic of the product. A mark is arbitrary if it is a real English word that has no relation to the produc... | abercrombie |
4 | fanciful | {'index': '4', 'text': 'The mark "Aswelly" for a taxi service.'} | A mark is generic if it is the common name for the product. A mark is descriptive if it describes a purpose, nature, or attribute of the product. A mark is suggestive if it suggests or implies a quality or characteristic of the product. A mark is arbitrary if it is a real English word that has no relation to the produc... | A mark is generic if it is the common name for the product. A mark is descriptive if it describes a purpose, nature, or attribute of the product. A mark is suggestive if it suggests or implies a quality or characteristic of the product. A mark is arbitrary if it is a real English word that has no relation to the produc... | abercrombie |
1 | descriptive | {'index': '1', 'text': 'The mark "Tasty" for bread.'} | A mark is generic if it is the common name for the product. A mark is descriptive if it describes a purpose, nature, or attribute of the product. A mark is suggestive if it suggests or implies a quality or characteristic of the product. A mark is arbitrary if it is a real English word that has no relation to the produc... | A mark is generic if it is the common name for the product. A mark is descriptive if it describes a purpose, nature, or attribute of the product. A mark is suggestive if it suggests or implies a quality or characteristic of the product. A mark is arbitrary if it is a real English word that has no relation to the produc... | abercrombie |
3 | arbitrary | {'index': '3', 'text': 'The mark "Virgin" for wireless communications.'} | A mark is generic if it is the common name for the product. A mark is descriptive if it describes a purpose, nature, or attribute of the product. A mark is suggestive if it suggests or implies a quality or characteristic of the product. A mark is arbitrary if it is a real English word that has no relation to the produc... | A mark is generic if it is the common name for the product. A mark is descriptive if it describes a purpose, nature, or attribute of the product. A mark is suggestive if it suggests or implies a quality or characteristic of the product. A mark is arbitrary if it is a real English word that has no relation to the produc... | abercrombie |
6 | suggestive | {'index': 8.0, 'text': 'The mark "KitchenAid" for kitchen tools.'} | A mark is generic if it is the common name for the product. A mark is descriptive if it describes a purpose, nature, or attribute of the product. A mark is suggestive if it suggests or implies a quality or characteristic of the product. A mark is arbitrary if it is a real English word that has no relation to the produc... | A mark is generic if it is the common name for the product. A mark is descriptive if it describes a purpose, nature, or attribute of the product. A mark is suggestive if it suggests or implies a quality or characteristic of the product. A mark is arbitrary if it is a real English word that has no relation to the produc... | abercrombie |
7 | arbitrary | {'index': 9.0, 'text': 'The mark "Dove" for body care products.'} | A mark is generic if it is the common name for the product. A mark is descriptive if it describes a purpose, nature, or attribute of the product. A mark is suggestive if it suggests or implies a quality or characteristic of the product. A mark is arbitrary if it is a real English word that has no relation to the produc... | A mark is generic if it is the common name for the product. A mark is descriptive if it describes a purpose, nature, or attribute of the product. A mark is suggestive if it suggests or implies a quality or characteristic of the product. A mark is arbitrary if it is a real English word that has no relation to the produc... | abercrombie |
6 | dismissed | {'index': 6, 'text': 'The appeal with respect to assessments made under the Income Tax Act for the Appellant’s 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009 taxation years is therefore dismissed. No costs shall be awarded. Signed at Timmins, Ontario, this 9th day of April 2024. (Brereton v The King, https://decision.tcc-cci.gc.ca/tcc-cci/... | INSTRUCTIONS: Indicate whether the following judgment excerpt from a Tax Court of Canada decision allows the appeal or dismisses the appeal. Where the result is mixed, indicate that the appeal was allowed. Ignore costs orders. Where the outcome is unclear indicate other.
Options: allowed, dimissed, other
JUDGMENT EX... | INSTRUCTIONS: Indicate whether the following judgment excerpt from a Tax Court of Canada decision allows the appeal or dismisses the appeal. Where the result is mixed, indicate that the appeal was allowed. Ignore costs orders. Where the outcome is unclear indicate other.
Options: allowed, dimissed, other
JUDGMENT EXC... | canada_tax_court_outcomes |
3 | dismissed | {'index': '3', 'text': 'The appeal filed by the Appellant against the Respondents decision regarding the calculation of the guaranteed income supplement that she was entitled to under the Old Age Security Act for the months of February to June 2014 (included within the payment period of July 1, 2013 to June 30, 2014) i... | INSTRUCTIONS: Indicate whether the following judgment excerpt from a Tax Court of Canada decision allows the appeal or dismisses the appeal. Where the result is mixed, indicate that the appeal was allowed. Ignore costs orders. Where the outcome is unclear indicate other.
Options: allowed, dimissed, other
JUDGMENT EX... | INSTRUCTIONS: Indicate whether the following judgment excerpt from a Tax Court of Canada decision allows the appeal or dismisses the appeal. Where the result is mixed, indicate that the appeal was allowed. Ignore costs orders. Where the outcome is unclear indicate other.
Options: allowed, dimissed, other
OUTCOME: | canada_tax_court_outcomes |
10 | other | {'index': 10, 'text': 'In light of my consideration of the factors set out in subsection 147(3) of the Rules, and my review of the Court’s costs decisions, 35% of total costs strikes me as an appropriate award for the Respondent. This amounts to a fixed cost award of $92,728.42. The Respondent is also entitled to recov... | INSTRUCTIONS: Indicate whether the following judgment excerpt from a Tax Court of Canada decision allows the appeal or dismisses the appeal. Where the result is mixed, indicate that the appeal was allowed. Ignore costs orders. Where the outcome is unclear indicate other.
Options: allowed, dimissed, other
JUDGMENT EX... | INSTRUCTIONS: Indicate whether the following judgment excerpt from a Tax Court of Canada decision allows the appeal or dismisses the appeal. Where the result is mixed, indicate that the appeal was allowed. Ignore costs orders. Where the outcome is unclear indicate other.
Options: allowed, dimissed, other
JUDGMENT EXC... | canada_tax_court_outcomes |
7 | dismissed | {'index': 7, 'text': 'Repeated words in a section should be given a consistent interpretation. The law from Thomson states that one takes the term or expression as it appears elsewhere in the Act, analyzes the interpretation given to the term to understand its meaning in context, and then applies the presumption of con... | INSTRUCTIONS: Indicate whether the following judgment excerpt from a Tax Court of Canada decision allows the appeal or dismisses the appeal. Where the result is mixed, indicate that the appeal was allowed. Ignore costs orders. Where the outcome is unclear indicate other.
Options: allowed, dimissed, other
JUDGMENT EX... | INSTRUCTIONS: Indicate whether the following judgment excerpt from a Tax Court of Canada decision allows the appeal or dismisses the appeal. Where the result is mixed, indicate that the appeal was allowed. Ignore costs orders. Where the outcome is unclear indicate other.
Options: allowed, dimissed, other
JUDGMENT EXC... | canada_tax_court_outcomes |
4 | other | {'index': '4', 'text': 'Pursuant to Rule 172 of the Tax Court of Canada Rules (General Procedure), these amended reasons for judgment are issued in substitution to the reasons for judgment issued on May 26, 2015.\nUpon paragraphs [9] and [10] having been inadvertently inverted;\nThe reasons for judgment issued on May 2... | INSTRUCTIONS: Indicate whether the following judgment excerpt from a Tax Court of Canada decision allows the appeal or dismisses the appeal. Where the result is mixed, indicate that the appeal was allowed. Ignore costs orders. Where the outcome is unclear indicate other.
Options: allowed, dimissed, other
JUDGMENT EX... | INSTRUCTIONS: Indicate whether the following judgment excerpt from a Tax Court of Canada decision allows the appeal or dismisses the appeal. Where the result is mixed, indicate that the appeal was allowed. Ignore costs orders. Where the outcome is unclear indicate other.
Options: allowed, dimissed, other
OUTCOME: | canada_tax_court_outcomes |
6 | dismissed | {'index': 6, 'text': 'The appeal with respect to assessments made under the Income Tax Act for the Appellant’s 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009 taxation years is therefore dismissed. No costs shall be awarded. Signed at Timmins, Ontario, this 9th day of April 2024. (Brereton v The King, https://decision.tcc-cci.gc.ca/tcc-cci/... | INSTRUCTIONS: Indicate whether the following judgment excerpt from a Tax Court of Canada decision allows the appeal or dismisses the appeal. Where the result is mixed, indicate that the appeal was allowed. Ignore costs orders. Where the outcome is unclear indicate other.
Options: allowed, dimissed, other
JUDGMENT EX... | INSTRUCTIONS: Indicate whether the following judgment excerpt from a Tax Court of Canada decision allows the appeal or dismisses the appeal. Where the result is mixed, indicate that the appeal was allowed. Ignore costs orders. Where the outcome is unclear indicate other.
Options: allowed, dimissed, other
JUDGMENT EXC... | canada_tax_court_outcomes |
9 | allowed | {'index': 9, 'text': 'For the foregoing reasons, the appeal of the Appellant is allowed and the matter referred back to the Minister for reassessment in accordance with my reasons. More specifically, the Minister shall reassess the Appellant in respect of its 2014 Taxation Year on the basis that:\n\n(a) World Surplus a... | INSTRUCTIONS: Indicate whether the following judgment excerpt from a Tax Court of Canada decision allows the appeal or dismisses the appeal. Where the result is mixed, indicate that the appeal was allowed. Ignore costs orders. Where the outcome is unclear indicate other.
Options: allowed, dimissed, other
JUDGMENT EX... | INSTRUCTIONS: Indicate whether the following judgment excerpt from a Tax Court of Canada decision allows the appeal or dismisses the appeal. Where the result is mixed, indicate that the appeal was allowed. Ignore costs orders. Where the outcome is unclear indicate other.
Options: allowed, dimissed, other
The Appellan... | canada_tax_court_outcomes |
2 | dismissed | {'index': '2', 'text': 'The appeal from the reassessments made under the Income Tax Act with respect to the Appellants 2008 and 2009 taxation years is dismissed, without costs, in accordance with the attached Reasons for Judgment.\nSigned at Montral, Qubec this 23rd day of April 2014.\nPatrick Boyle\nBoyle J.\n'} | INSTRUCTIONS: Indicate whether the following judgment excerpt from a Tax Court of Canada decision allows the appeal or dismisses the appeal. Where the result is mixed, indicate that the appeal was allowed. Ignore costs orders. Where the outcome is unclear indicate other.
Options: allowed, dimissed, other
JUDGMENT EX... | INSTRUCTIONS: Indicate whether the following judgment excerpt from a Tax Court of Canada decision allows the appeal or dismisses the appeal. Where the result is mixed, indicate that the appeal was allowed. Ignore costs orders. Where the outcome is unclear indicate other.
Options: allowed, dimissed, other
OUTCOME: | canada_tax_court_outcomes |
6 | dismissed | {'index': 6, 'text': 'The appeal with respect to assessments made under the Income Tax Act for the Appellant’s 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009 taxation years is therefore dismissed. No costs shall be awarded. Signed at Timmins, Ontario, this 9th day of April 2024. (Brereton v The King, https://decision.tcc-cci.gc.ca/tcc-cci/... | INSTRUCTIONS: Indicate whether the following judgment excerpt from a Tax Court of Canada decision allows the appeal or dismisses the appeal. Where the result is mixed, indicate that the appeal was allowed. Ignore costs orders. Where the outcome is unclear indicate other.
Options: allowed, dimissed, other
JUDGMENT EX... | INSTRUCTIONS: Indicate whether the following judgment excerpt from a Tax Court of Canada decision allows the appeal or dismisses the appeal. Where the result is mixed, indicate that the appeal was allowed. Ignore costs orders. Where the outcome is unclear indicate other.
Options: allowed, dimissed, other
JUDGMENT EXC... | canada_tax_court_outcomes |
10 | other | {'index': 10, 'text': 'In light of my consideration of the factors set out in subsection 147(3) of the Rules, and my review of the Court’s costs decisions, 35% of total costs strikes me as an appropriate award for the Respondent. This amounts to a fixed cost award of $92,728.42. The Respondent is also entitled to recov... | INSTRUCTIONS: Indicate whether the following judgment excerpt from a Tax Court of Canada decision allows the appeal or dismisses the appeal. Where the result is mixed, indicate that the appeal was allowed. Ignore costs orders. Where the outcome is unclear indicate other.
Options: allowed, dimissed, other
JUDGMENT EX... | INSTRUCTIONS: Indicate whether the following judgment excerpt from a Tax Court of Canada decision allows the appeal or dismisses the appeal. Where the result is mixed, indicate that the appeal was allowed. Ignore costs orders. Where the outcome is unclear indicate other.
Options: allowed, dimissed, other
JUDGMENT EXC... | canada_tax_court_outcomes |
10 | other | {'index': 10, 'text': 'In light of my consideration of the factors set out in subsection 147(3) of the Rules, and my review of the Court’s costs decisions, 35% of total costs strikes me as an appropriate award for the Respondent. This amounts to a fixed cost award of $92,728.42. The Respondent is also entitled to recov... | INSTRUCTIONS: Indicate whether the following judgment excerpt from a Tax Court of Canada decision allows the appeal or dismisses the appeal. Where the result is mixed, indicate that the appeal was allowed. Ignore costs orders. Where the outcome is unclear indicate other.
Options: allowed, dimissed, other
JUDGMENT EX... | INSTRUCTIONS: Indicate whether the following judgment excerpt from a Tax Court of Canada decision allows the appeal or dismisses the appeal. Where the result is mixed, indicate that the appeal was allowed. Ignore costs orders. Where the outcome is unclear indicate other.
Options: allowed, dimissed, other
JUDGMENT EXC... | canada_tax_court_outcomes |
7 | dismissed | {'index': 7, 'text': 'Repeated words in a section should be given a consistent interpretation. The law from Thomson states that one takes the term or expression as it appears elsewhere in the Act, analyzes the interpretation given to the term to understand its meaning in context, and then applies the presumption of con... | INSTRUCTIONS: Indicate whether the following judgment excerpt from a Tax Court of Canada decision allows the appeal or dismisses the appeal. Where the result is mixed, indicate that the appeal was allowed. Ignore costs orders. Where the outcome is unclear indicate other.
Options: allowed, dimissed, other
JUDGMENT EX... | INSTRUCTIONS: Indicate whether the following judgment excerpt from a Tax Court of Canada decision allows the appeal or dismisses the appeal. Where the result is mixed, indicate that the appeal was allowed. Ignore costs orders. Where the outcome is unclear indicate other.
Options: allowed, dimissed, other
JUDGMENT EXC... | canada_tax_court_outcomes |
4 | other | {'index': '4', 'text': 'Pursuant to Rule 172 of the Tax Court of Canada Rules (General Procedure), these amended reasons for judgment are issued in substitution to the reasons for judgment issued on May 26, 2015.\nUpon paragraphs [9] and [10] having been inadvertently inverted;\nThe reasons for judgment issued on May 2... | INSTRUCTIONS: Indicate whether the following judgment excerpt from a Tax Court of Canada decision allows the appeal or dismisses the appeal. Where the result is mixed, indicate that the appeal was allowed. Ignore costs orders. Where the outcome is unclear indicate other.
Options: allowed, dimissed, other
JUDGMENT EX... | INSTRUCTIONS: Indicate whether the following judgment excerpt from a Tax Court of Canada decision allows the appeal or dismisses the appeal. Where the result is mixed, indicate that the appeal was allowed. Ignore costs orders. Where the outcome is unclear indicate other.
Options: allowed, dimissed, other
OUTCOME: | canada_tax_court_outcomes |
3 | dismissed | {'index': '3', 'text': 'The appeal filed by the Appellant against the Respondents decision regarding the calculation of the guaranteed income supplement that she was entitled to under the Old Age Security Act for the months of February to June 2014 (included within the payment period of July 1, 2013 to June 30, 2014) i... | INSTRUCTIONS: Indicate whether the following judgment excerpt from a Tax Court of Canada decision allows the appeal or dismisses the appeal. Where the result is mixed, indicate that the appeal was allowed. Ignore costs orders. Where the outcome is unclear indicate other.
Options: allowed, dimissed, other
JUDGMENT EX... | INSTRUCTIONS: Indicate whether the following judgment excerpt from a Tax Court of Canada decision allows the appeal or dismisses the appeal. Where the result is mixed, indicate that the appeal was allowed. Ignore costs orders. Where the outcome is unclear indicate other.
Options: allowed, dimissed, other
OUTCOME: | canada_tax_court_outcomes |
7 | dismissed | {'index': 7, 'text': 'Repeated words in a section should be given a consistent interpretation. The law from Thomson states that one takes the term or expression as it appears elsewhere in the Act, analyzes the interpretation given to the term to understand its meaning in context, and then applies the presumption of con... | INSTRUCTIONS: Indicate whether the following judgment excerpt from a Tax Court of Canada decision allows the appeal or dismisses the appeal. Where the result is mixed, indicate that the appeal was allowed. Ignore costs orders. Where the outcome is unclear indicate other.
Options: allowed, dimissed, other
JUDGMENT EX... | INSTRUCTIONS: Indicate whether the following judgment excerpt from a Tax Court of Canada decision allows the appeal or dismisses the appeal. Where the result is mixed, indicate that the appeal was allowed. Ignore costs orders. Where the outcome is unclear indicate other.
Options: allowed, dimissed, other
JUDGMENT EXC... | canada_tax_court_outcomes |
7 | dismissed | {'index': 7, 'text': 'Repeated words in a section should be given a consistent interpretation. The law from Thomson states that one takes the term or expression as it appears elsewhere in the Act, analyzes the interpretation given to the term to understand its meaning in context, and then applies the presumption of con... | INSTRUCTIONS: Indicate whether the following judgment excerpt from a Tax Court of Canada decision allows the appeal or dismisses the appeal. Where the result is mixed, indicate that the appeal was allowed. Ignore costs orders. Where the outcome is unclear indicate other.
Options: allowed, dimissed, other
JUDGMENT EX... | INSTRUCTIONS: Indicate whether the following judgment excerpt from a Tax Court of Canada decision allows the appeal or dismisses the appeal. Where the result is mixed, indicate that the appeal was allowed. Ignore costs orders. Where the outcome is unclear indicate other.
Options: allowed, dimissed, other
JUDGMENT EXC... | canada_tax_court_outcomes |
2 | dismissed | {'index': '2', 'text': 'The appeal from the reassessments made under the Income Tax Act with respect to the Appellants 2008 and 2009 taxation years is dismissed, without costs, in accordance with the attached Reasons for Judgment.\nSigned at Montral, Qubec this 23rd day of April 2014.\nPatrick Boyle\nBoyle J.\n'} | INSTRUCTIONS: Indicate whether the following judgment excerpt from a Tax Court of Canada decision allows the appeal or dismisses the appeal. Where the result is mixed, indicate that the appeal was allowed. Ignore costs orders. Where the outcome is unclear indicate other.
Options: allowed, dimissed, other
JUDGMENT EX... | INSTRUCTIONS: Indicate whether the following judgment excerpt from a Tax Court of Canada decision allows the appeal or dismisses the appeal. Where the result is mixed, indicate that the appeal was allowed. Ignore costs orders. Where the outcome is unclear indicate other.
Options: allowed, dimissed, other
OUTCOME: | canada_tax_court_outcomes |
5 | other | {'index': '5', 'text': '(Delivered orally at the hearing of May 2, 2006, at Montral, Quebec.)\nLamarre Proulx J.\n[1] These appeals pertain to the 2002 and 2003 taxation years.\n[2] The facts are set out as follows in paragraph 18 of the Reply to the Notice of Appeal ("the Reply"):\n[TRANSLATION]\n(a) The Appellant wor... | INSTRUCTIONS: Indicate whether the following judgment excerpt from a Tax Court of Canada decision allows the appeal or dismisses the appeal. Where the result is mixed, indicate that the appeal was allowed. Ignore costs orders. Where the outcome is unclear indicate other.
Options: allowed, dimissed, other
JUDGMENT EX... | INSTRUCTIONS: Indicate whether the following judgment excerpt from a Tax Court of Canada decision allows the appeal or dismisses the appeal. Where the result is mixed, indicate that the appeal was allowed. Ignore costs orders. Where the outcome is unclear indicate other.
Options: allowed, dimissed, other
OUTCOME: | canada_tax_court_outcomes |
4 | other | {'index': '4', 'text': 'Pursuant to Rule 172 of the Tax Court of Canada Rules (General Procedure), these amended reasons for judgment are issued in substitution to the reasons for judgment issued on May 26, 2015.\nUpon paragraphs [9] and [10] having been inadvertently inverted;\nThe reasons for judgment issued on May 2... | INSTRUCTIONS: Indicate whether the following judgment excerpt from a Tax Court of Canada decision allows the appeal or dismisses the appeal. Where the result is mixed, indicate that the appeal was allowed. Ignore costs orders. Where the outcome is unclear indicate other.
Options: allowed, dimissed, other
JUDGMENT EX... | INSTRUCTIONS: Indicate whether the following judgment excerpt from a Tax Court of Canada decision allows the appeal or dismisses the appeal. Where the result is mixed, indicate that the appeal was allowed. Ignore costs orders. Where the outcome is unclear indicate other.
Options: allowed, dimissed, other
OUTCOME: | canada_tax_court_outcomes |
1 | allowed | {'index': '1', 'text': 'This appeal is allowed and the matter is referred back to the Minister for reconsideration and further redeterminations on the bases that the Appellant is entitled to the denied CCTB benefit payments for the beginning of each month within the period July 2013 through to and including March 2015,... | INSTRUCTIONS: Indicate whether the following judgment excerpt from a Tax Court of Canada decision allows the appeal or dismisses the appeal. Where the result is mixed, indicate that the appeal was allowed. Ignore costs orders. Where the outcome is unclear indicate other.
Options: allowed, dimissed, other
JUDGMENT EX... | INSTRUCTIONS: Indicate whether the following judgment excerpt from a Tax Court of Canada decision allows the appeal or dismisses the appeal. Where the result is mixed, indicate that the appeal was allowed. Ignore costs orders. Where the outcome is unclear indicate other.
Options: allowed, dimissed, other
OUTCOME: | canada_tax_court_outcomes |
7 | dismissed | {'index': 7, 'text': 'Repeated words in a section should be given a consistent interpretation. The law from Thomson states that one takes the term or expression as it appears elsewhere in the Act, analyzes the interpretation given to the term to understand its meaning in context, and then applies the presumption of con... | INSTRUCTIONS: Indicate whether the following judgment excerpt from a Tax Court of Canada decision allows the appeal or dismisses the appeal. Where the result is mixed, indicate that the appeal was allowed. Ignore costs orders. Where the outcome is unclear indicate other.
Options: allowed, dimissed, other
JUDGMENT EX... | INSTRUCTIONS: Indicate whether the following judgment excerpt from a Tax Court of Canada decision allows the appeal or dismisses the appeal. Where the result is mixed, indicate that the appeal was allowed. Ignore costs orders. Where the outcome is unclear indicate other.
Options: allowed, dimissed, other
JUDGMENT EXC... | canada_tax_court_outcomes |
11 | other | {'index': 11, 'text': 'Would things have been different had the CRA, on March 17, 2021, not suggested to Mr. Campbell that he file notices of objection but, instead, reminded Mr. Campbell that he had just over two weeks to file an application with the Court to extend time to institute his appeals? We will never know. W... | INSTRUCTIONS: Indicate whether the following judgment excerpt from a Tax Court of Canada decision allows the appeal or dismisses the appeal. Where the result is mixed, indicate that the appeal was allowed. Ignore costs orders. Where the outcome is unclear indicate other.
Options: allowed, dimissed, other
JUDGMENT EX... | INSTRUCTIONS: Indicate whether the following judgment excerpt from a Tax Court of Canada decision allows the appeal or dismisses the appeal. Where the result is mixed, indicate that the appeal was allowed. Ignore costs orders. Where the outcome is unclear indicate other.
Options: allowed, dimissed, other
JUDGMENT EXC... | canada_tax_court_outcomes |
5 | other | {'index': '5', 'text': '(Delivered orally at the hearing of May 2, 2006, at Montral, Quebec.)\nLamarre Proulx J.\n[1] These appeals pertain to the 2002 and 2003 taxation years.\n[2] The facts are set out as follows in paragraph 18 of the Reply to the Notice of Appeal ("the Reply"):\n[TRANSLATION]\n(a) The Appellant wor... | INSTRUCTIONS: Indicate whether the following judgment excerpt from a Tax Court of Canada decision allows the appeal or dismisses the appeal. Where the result is mixed, indicate that the appeal was allowed. Ignore costs orders. Where the outcome is unclear indicate other.
Options: allowed, dimissed, other
JUDGMENT EX... | INSTRUCTIONS: Indicate whether the following judgment excerpt from a Tax Court of Canada decision allows the appeal or dismisses the appeal. Where the result is mixed, indicate that the appeal was allowed. Ignore costs orders. Where the outcome is unclear indicate other.
Options: allowed, dimissed, other
OUTCOME: | canada_tax_court_outcomes |
1 | allowed | {'index': '1', 'text': 'This appeal is allowed and the matter is referred back to the Minister for reconsideration and further redeterminations on the bases that the Appellant is entitled to the denied CCTB benefit payments for the beginning of each month within the period July 2013 through to and including March 2015,... | INSTRUCTIONS: Indicate whether the following judgment excerpt from a Tax Court of Canada decision allows the appeal or dismisses the appeal. Where the result is mixed, indicate that the appeal was allowed. Ignore costs orders. Where the outcome is unclear indicate other.
Options: allowed, dimissed, other
JUDGMENT EX... | INSTRUCTIONS: Indicate whether the following judgment excerpt from a Tax Court of Canada decision allows the appeal or dismisses the appeal. Where the result is mixed, indicate that the appeal was allowed. Ignore costs orders. Where the outcome is unclear indicate other.
Options: allowed, dimissed, other
OUTCOME: | canada_tax_court_outcomes |
11 | other | {'index': 11, 'text': 'Would things have been different had the CRA, on March 17, 2021, not suggested to Mr. Campbell that he file notices of objection but, instead, reminded Mr. Campbell that he had just over two weeks to file an application with the Court to extend time to institute his appeals? We will never know. W... | INSTRUCTIONS: Indicate whether the following judgment excerpt from a Tax Court of Canada decision allows the appeal or dismisses the appeal. Where the result is mixed, indicate that the appeal was allowed. Ignore costs orders. Where the outcome is unclear indicate other.
Options: allowed, dimissed, other
JUDGMENT EX... | INSTRUCTIONS: Indicate whether the following judgment excerpt from a Tax Court of Canada decision allows the appeal or dismisses the appeal. Where the result is mixed, indicate that the appeal was allowed. Ignore costs orders. Where the outcome is unclear indicate other.
Options: allowed, dimissed, other
JUDGMENT EXC... | canada_tax_court_outcomes |
4 | other | {'index': '4', 'text': 'Pursuant to Rule 172 of the Tax Court of Canada Rules (General Procedure), these amended reasons for judgment are issued in substitution to the reasons for judgment issued on May 26, 2015.\nUpon paragraphs [9] and [10] having been inadvertently inverted;\nThe reasons for judgment issued on May 2... | INSTRUCTIONS: Indicate whether the following judgment excerpt from a Tax Court of Canada decision allows the appeal or dismisses the appeal. Where the result is mixed, indicate that the appeal was allowed. Ignore costs orders. Where the outcome is unclear indicate other.
Options: allowed, dimissed, other
JUDGMENT EX... | INSTRUCTIONS: Indicate whether the following judgment excerpt from a Tax Court of Canada decision allows the appeal or dismisses the appeal. Where the result is mixed, indicate that the appeal was allowed. Ignore costs orders. Where the outcome is unclear indicate other.
Options: allowed, dimissed, other
OUTCOME: | canada_tax_court_outcomes |
0 | allowed | {'index': '0', 'text': 'The appeal from the reassessment dated October 29, 2018 made under the Income Tax Act for the 2017 taxation year is allowed, without costs, and the reassessment is vacated in accordance with the attached reasons for judgment.\nSigned at Ottawa, Canada, this 14th day of July 2020.\nDavid E. Spiro... | INSTRUCTIONS: Indicate whether the following judgment excerpt from a Tax Court of Canada decision allows the appeal or dismisses the appeal. Where the result is mixed, indicate that the appeal was allowed. Ignore costs orders. Where the outcome is unclear indicate other.
Options: allowed, dimissed, other
JUDGMENT EX... | INSTRUCTIONS: Indicate whether the following judgment excerpt from a Tax Court of Canada decision allows the appeal or dismisses the appeal. Where the result is mixed, indicate that the appeal was allowed. Ignore costs orders. Where the outcome is unclear indicate other.
Options: allowed, dimissed, other
OUTCOME: | canada_tax_court_outcomes |
11 | other | {'index': 11, 'text': 'Would things have been different had the CRA, on March 17, 2021, not suggested to Mr. Campbell that he file notices of objection but, instead, reminded Mr. Campbell that he had just over two weeks to file an application with the Court to extend time to institute his appeals? We will never know. W... | INSTRUCTIONS: Indicate whether the following judgment excerpt from a Tax Court of Canada decision allows the appeal or dismisses the appeal. Where the result is mixed, indicate that the appeal was allowed. Ignore costs orders. Where the outcome is unclear indicate other.
Options: allowed, dimissed, other
JUDGMENT EX... | INSTRUCTIONS: Indicate whether the following judgment excerpt from a Tax Court of Canada decision allows the appeal or dismisses the appeal. Where the result is mixed, indicate that the appeal was allowed. Ignore costs orders. Where the outcome is unclear indicate other.
Options: allowed, dimissed, other
JUDGMENT EXC... | canada_tax_court_outcomes |
9 | allowed | {'index': 9, 'text': 'For the foregoing reasons, the appeal of the Appellant is allowed and the matter referred back to the Minister for reassessment in accordance with my reasons. More specifically, the Minister shall reassess the Appellant in respect of its 2014 Taxation Year on the basis that:\n\n(a) World Surplus a... | INSTRUCTIONS: Indicate whether the following judgment excerpt from a Tax Court of Canada decision allows the appeal or dismisses the appeal. Where the result is mixed, indicate that the appeal was allowed. Ignore costs orders. Where the outcome is unclear indicate other.
Options: allowed, dimissed, other
JUDGMENT EX... | INSTRUCTIONS: Indicate whether the following judgment excerpt from a Tax Court of Canada decision allows the appeal or dismisses the appeal. Where the result is mixed, indicate that the appeal was allowed. Ignore costs orders. Where the outcome is unclear indicate other.
Options: allowed, dimissed, other
The Appellan... | canada_tax_court_outcomes |
5 | other | {'index': '5', 'text': '(Delivered orally at the hearing of May 2, 2006, at Montral, Quebec.)\nLamarre Proulx J.\n[1] These appeals pertain to the 2002 and 2003 taxation years.\n[2] The facts are set out as follows in paragraph 18 of the Reply to the Notice of Appeal ("the Reply"):\n[TRANSLATION]\n(a) The Appellant wor... | INSTRUCTIONS: Indicate whether the following judgment excerpt from a Tax Court of Canada decision allows the appeal or dismisses the appeal. Where the result is mixed, indicate that the appeal was allowed. Ignore costs orders. Where the outcome is unclear indicate other.
Options: allowed, dimissed, other
JUDGMENT EX... | INSTRUCTIONS: Indicate whether the following judgment excerpt from a Tax Court of Canada decision allows the appeal or dismisses the appeal. Where the result is mixed, indicate that the appeal was allowed. Ignore costs orders. Where the outcome is unclear indicate other.
Options: allowed, dimissed, other
OUTCOME: | canada_tax_court_outcomes |
11 | other | {'index': 11, 'text': 'Would things have been different had the CRA, on March 17, 2021, not suggested to Mr. Campbell that he file notices of objection but, instead, reminded Mr. Campbell that he had just over two weeks to file an application with the Court to extend time to institute his appeals? We will never know. W... | INSTRUCTIONS: Indicate whether the following judgment excerpt from a Tax Court of Canada decision allows the appeal or dismisses the appeal. Where the result is mixed, indicate that the appeal was allowed. Ignore costs orders. Where the outcome is unclear indicate other.
Options: allowed, dimissed, other
JUDGMENT EX... | INSTRUCTIONS: Indicate whether the following judgment excerpt from a Tax Court of Canada decision allows the appeal or dismisses the appeal. Where the result is mixed, indicate that the appeal was allowed. Ignore costs orders. Where the outcome is unclear indicate other.
Options: allowed, dimissed, other
JUDGMENT EXC... | canada_tax_court_outcomes |
8 | allowed | {'index': 8, 'text': "[TRANSLATION] The father took care of his children while they were with him. During weekday overnight stays, he would eat dinner with them and prepare their school lunches for the next day. He made sure they did their homework in the evening. The father attended some of the children's activities, ... | INSTRUCTIONS: Indicate whether the following judgment excerpt from a Tax Court of Canada decision allows the appeal or dismisses the appeal. Where the result is mixed, indicate that the appeal was allowed. Ignore costs orders. Where the outcome is unclear indicate other.
Options: allowed, dimissed, other
JUDGMENT EX... | INSTRUCTIONS: Indicate whether the following judgment excerpt from a Tax Court of Canada decision allows the appeal or dismisses the appeal. Where the result is mixed, indicate that the appeal was allowed. Ignore costs orders. Where the outcome is unclear indicate other.
Options: allowed, dimissed, other
JUDGMENT EXC... | canada_tax_court_outcomes |
0 | allowed | {'index': '0', 'text': 'The appeal from the reassessment dated October 29, 2018 made under the Income Tax Act for the 2017 taxation year is allowed, without costs, and the reassessment is vacated in accordance with the attached reasons for judgment.\nSigned at Ottawa, Canada, this 14th day of July 2020.\nDavid E. Spiro... | INSTRUCTIONS: Indicate whether the following judgment excerpt from a Tax Court of Canada decision allows the appeal or dismisses the appeal. Where the result is mixed, indicate that the appeal was allowed. Ignore costs orders. Where the outcome is unclear indicate other.
Options: allowed, dimissed, other
JUDGMENT EX... | INSTRUCTIONS: Indicate whether the following judgment excerpt from a Tax Court of Canada decision allows the appeal or dismisses the appeal. Where the result is mixed, indicate that the appeal was allowed. Ignore costs orders. Where the outcome is unclear indicate other.
Options: allowed, dimissed, other
OUTCOME: | canada_tax_court_outcomes |
10 | other | {'index': 10, 'text': 'In light of my consideration of the factors set out in subsection 147(3) of the Rules, and my review of the Court’s costs decisions, 35% of total costs strikes me as an appropriate award for the Respondent. This amounts to a fixed cost award of $92,728.42. The Respondent is also entitled to recov... | INSTRUCTIONS: Indicate whether the following judgment excerpt from a Tax Court of Canada decision allows the appeal or dismisses the appeal. Where the result is mixed, indicate that the appeal was allowed. Ignore costs orders. Where the outcome is unclear indicate other.
Options: allowed, dimissed, other
JUDGMENT EX... | INSTRUCTIONS: Indicate whether the following judgment excerpt from a Tax Court of Canada decision allows the appeal or dismisses the appeal. Where the result is mixed, indicate that the appeal was allowed. Ignore costs orders. Where the outcome is unclear indicate other.
Options: allowed, dimissed, other
JUDGMENT EXC... | canada_tax_court_outcomes |
10 | other | {'index': 10, 'text': 'In light of my consideration of the factors set out in subsection 147(3) of the Rules, and my review of the Court’s costs decisions, 35% of total costs strikes me as an appropriate award for the Respondent. This amounts to a fixed cost award of $92,728.42. The Respondent is also entitled to recov... | INSTRUCTIONS: Indicate whether the following judgment excerpt from a Tax Court of Canada decision allows the appeal or dismisses the appeal. Where the result is mixed, indicate that the appeal was allowed. Ignore costs orders. Where the outcome is unclear indicate other.
Options: allowed, dimissed, other
JUDGMENT EX... | INSTRUCTIONS: Indicate whether the following judgment excerpt from a Tax Court of Canada decision allows the appeal or dismisses the appeal. Where the result is mixed, indicate that the appeal was allowed. Ignore costs orders. Where the outcome is unclear indicate other.
Options: allowed, dimissed, other
JUDGMENT EXC... | canada_tax_court_outcomes |
9 | allowed | {'index': 9, 'text': 'For the foregoing reasons, the appeal of the Appellant is allowed and the matter referred back to the Minister for reassessment in accordance with my reasons. More specifically, the Minister shall reassess the Appellant in respect of its 2014 Taxation Year on the basis that:\n\n(a) World Surplus a... | INSTRUCTIONS: Indicate whether the following judgment excerpt from a Tax Court of Canada decision allows the appeal or dismisses the appeal. Where the result is mixed, indicate that the appeal was allowed. Ignore costs orders. Where the outcome is unclear indicate other.
Options: allowed, dimissed, other
JUDGMENT EX... | INSTRUCTIONS: Indicate whether the following judgment excerpt from a Tax Court of Canada decision allows the appeal or dismisses the appeal. Where the result is mixed, indicate that the appeal was allowed. Ignore costs orders. Where the outcome is unclear indicate other.
Options: allowed, dimissed, other
The Appellan... | canada_tax_court_outcomes |
11 | other | {'index': 11, 'text': 'Would things have been different had the CRA, on March 17, 2021, not suggested to Mr. Campbell that he file notices of objection but, instead, reminded Mr. Campbell that he had just over two weeks to file an application with the Court to extend time to institute his appeals? We will never know. W... | INSTRUCTIONS: Indicate whether the following judgment excerpt from a Tax Court of Canada decision allows the appeal or dismisses the appeal. Where the result is mixed, indicate that the appeal was allowed. Ignore costs orders. Where the outcome is unclear indicate other.
Options: allowed, dimissed, other
JUDGMENT EX... | INSTRUCTIONS: Indicate whether the following judgment excerpt from a Tax Court of Canada decision allows the appeal or dismisses the appeal. Where the result is mixed, indicate that the appeal was allowed. Ignore costs orders. Where the outcome is unclear indicate other.
Options: allowed, dimissed, other
JUDGMENT EXC... | canada_tax_court_outcomes |
11 | other | {'index': 11, 'text': 'Would things have been different had the CRA, on March 17, 2021, not suggested to Mr. Campbell that he file notices of objection but, instead, reminded Mr. Campbell that he had just over two weeks to file an application with the Court to extend time to institute his appeals? We will never know. W... | INSTRUCTIONS: Indicate whether the following judgment excerpt from a Tax Court of Canada decision allows the appeal or dismisses the appeal. Where the result is mixed, indicate that the appeal was allowed. Ignore costs orders. Where the outcome is unclear indicate other.
Options: allowed, dimissed, other
JUDGMENT EX... | INSTRUCTIONS: Indicate whether the following judgment excerpt from a Tax Court of Canada decision allows the appeal or dismisses the appeal. Where the result is mixed, indicate that the appeal was allowed. Ignore costs orders. Where the outcome is unclear indicate other.
Options: allowed, dimissed, other
JUDGMENT EXC... | canada_tax_court_outcomes |
2 | dismissed | {'index': '2', 'text': 'The appeal from the reassessments made under the Income Tax Act with respect to the Appellants 2008 and 2009 taxation years is dismissed, without costs, in accordance with the attached Reasons for Judgment.\nSigned at Montral, Qubec this 23rd day of April 2014.\nPatrick Boyle\nBoyle J.\n'} | INSTRUCTIONS: Indicate whether the following judgment excerpt from a Tax Court of Canada decision allows the appeal or dismisses the appeal. Where the result is mixed, indicate that the appeal was allowed. Ignore costs orders. Where the outcome is unclear indicate other.
Options: allowed, dimissed, other
JUDGMENT EX... | INSTRUCTIONS: Indicate whether the following judgment excerpt from a Tax Court of Canada decision allows the appeal or dismisses the appeal. Where the result is mixed, indicate that the appeal was allowed. Ignore costs orders. Where the outcome is unclear indicate other.
Options: allowed, dimissed, other
OUTCOME: | canada_tax_court_outcomes |
11 | other | {'index': 11, 'text': 'Would things have been different had the CRA, on March 17, 2021, not suggested to Mr. Campbell that he file notices of objection but, instead, reminded Mr. Campbell that he had just over two weeks to file an application with the Court to extend time to institute his appeals? We will never know. W... | INSTRUCTIONS: Indicate whether the following judgment excerpt from a Tax Court of Canada decision allows the appeal or dismisses the appeal. Where the result is mixed, indicate that the appeal was allowed. Ignore costs orders. Where the outcome is unclear indicate other.
Options: allowed, dimissed, other
JUDGMENT EX... | INSTRUCTIONS: Indicate whether the following judgment excerpt from a Tax Court of Canada decision allows the appeal or dismisses the appeal. Where the result is mixed, indicate that the appeal was allowed. Ignore costs orders. Where the outcome is unclear indicate other.
Options: allowed, dimissed, other
JUDGMENT EXC... | canada_tax_court_outcomes |
6 | dismissed | {'index': 6, 'text': 'The appeal with respect to assessments made under the Income Tax Act for the Appellant’s 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009 taxation years is therefore dismissed. No costs shall be awarded. Signed at Timmins, Ontario, this 9th day of April 2024. (Brereton v The King, https://decision.tcc-cci.gc.ca/tcc-cci/... | INSTRUCTIONS: Indicate whether the following judgment excerpt from a Tax Court of Canada decision allows the appeal or dismisses the appeal. Where the result is mixed, indicate that the appeal was allowed. Ignore costs orders. Where the outcome is unclear indicate other.
Options: allowed, dimissed, other
JUDGMENT EX... | INSTRUCTIONS: Indicate whether the following judgment excerpt from a Tax Court of Canada decision allows the appeal or dismisses the appeal. Where the result is mixed, indicate that the appeal was allowed. Ignore costs orders. Where the outcome is unclear indicate other.
Options: allowed, dimissed, other
JUDGMENT EXC... | canada_tax_court_outcomes |
3 | dismissed | {'index': '3', 'text': 'The appeal filed by the Appellant against the Respondents decision regarding the calculation of the guaranteed income supplement that she was entitled to under the Old Age Security Act for the months of February to June 2014 (included within the payment period of July 1, 2013 to June 30, 2014) i... | INSTRUCTIONS: Indicate whether the following judgment excerpt from a Tax Court of Canada decision allows the appeal or dismisses the appeal. Where the result is mixed, indicate that the appeal was allowed. Ignore costs orders. Where the outcome is unclear indicate other.
Options: allowed, dimissed, other
JUDGMENT EX... | INSTRUCTIONS: Indicate whether the following judgment excerpt from a Tax Court of Canada decision allows the appeal or dismisses the appeal. Where the result is mixed, indicate that the appeal was allowed. Ignore costs orders. Where the outcome is unclear indicate other.
Options: allowed, dimissed, other
OUTCOME: | canada_tax_court_outcomes |
8 | allowed | {'index': 8, 'text': "[TRANSLATION] The father took care of his children while they were with him. During weekday overnight stays, he would eat dinner with them and prepare their school lunches for the next day. He made sure they did their homework in the evening. The father attended some of the children's activities, ... | INSTRUCTIONS: Indicate whether the following judgment excerpt from a Tax Court of Canada decision allows the appeal or dismisses the appeal. Where the result is mixed, indicate that the appeal was allowed. Ignore costs orders. Where the outcome is unclear indicate other.
Options: allowed, dimissed, other
JUDGMENT EX... | INSTRUCTIONS: Indicate whether the following judgment excerpt from a Tax Court of Canada decision allows the appeal or dismisses the appeal. Where the result is mixed, indicate that the appeal was allowed. Ignore costs orders. Where the outcome is unclear indicate other.
Options: allowed, dimissed, other
JUDGMENT EXC... | canada_tax_court_outcomes |
2 | dismissed | {'index': '2', 'text': 'The appeal from the reassessments made under the Income Tax Act with respect to the Appellants 2008 and 2009 taxation years is dismissed, without costs, in accordance with the attached Reasons for Judgment.\nSigned at Montral, Qubec this 23rd day of April 2014.\nPatrick Boyle\nBoyle J.\n'} | INSTRUCTIONS: Indicate whether the following judgment excerpt from a Tax Court of Canada decision allows the appeal or dismisses the appeal. Where the result is mixed, indicate that the appeal was allowed. Ignore costs orders. Where the outcome is unclear indicate other.
Options: allowed, dimissed, other
JUDGMENT EX... | INSTRUCTIONS: Indicate whether the following judgment excerpt from a Tax Court of Canada decision allows the appeal or dismisses the appeal. Where the result is mixed, indicate that the appeal was allowed. Ignore costs orders. Where the outcome is unclear indicate other.
Options: allowed, dimissed, other
OUTCOME: | canada_tax_court_outcomes |
4 | other | {'index': '4', 'text': 'Pursuant to Rule 172 of the Tax Court of Canada Rules (General Procedure), these amended reasons for judgment are issued in substitution to the reasons for judgment issued on May 26, 2015.\nUpon paragraphs [9] and [10] having been inadvertently inverted;\nThe reasons for judgment issued on May 2... | INSTRUCTIONS: Indicate whether the following judgment excerpt from a Tax Court of Canada decision allows the appeal or dismisses the appeal. Where the result is mixed, indicate that the appeal was allowed. Ignore costs orders. Where the outcome is unclear indicate other.
Options: allowed, dimissed, other
JUDGMENT EX... | INSTRUCTIONS: Indicate whether the following judgment excerpt from a Tax Court of Canada decision allows the appeal or dismisses the appeal. Where the result is mixed, indicate that the appeal was allowed. Ignore costs orders. Where the outcome is unclear indicate other.
Options: allowed, dimissed, other
OUTCOME: | canada_tax_court_outcomes |
2 | dismissed | {'index': '2', 'text': 'The appeal from the reassessments made under the Income Tax Act with respect to the Appellants 2008 and 2009 taxation years is dismissed, without costs, in accordance with the attached Reasons for Judgment.\nSigned at Montral, Qubec this 23rd day of April 2014.\nPatrick Boyle\nBoyle J.\n'} | INSTRUCTIONS: Indicate whether the following judgment excerpt from a Tax Court of Canada decision allows the appeal or dismisses the appeal. Where the result is mixed, indicate that the appeal was allowed. Ignore costs orders. Where the outcome is unclear indicate other.
Options: allowed, dimissed, other
JUDGMENT EX... | INSTRUCTIONS: Indicate whether the following judgment excerpt from a Tax Court of Canada decision allows the appeal or dismisses the appeal. Where the result is mixed, indicate that the appeal was allowed. Ignore costs orders. Where the outcome is unclear indicate other.
Options: allowed, dimissed, other
OUTCOME: | canada_tax_court_outcomes |
6 | dismissed | {'index': 6, 'text': 'The appeal with respect to assessments made under the Income Tax Act for the Appellant’s 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009 taxation years is therefore dismissed. No costs shall be awarded. Signed at Timmins, Ontario, this 9th day of April 2024. (Brereton v The King, https://decision.tcc-cci.gc.ca/tcc-cci/... | INSTRUCTIONS: Indicate whether the following judgment excerpt from a Tax Court of Canada decision allows the appeal or dismisses the appeal. Where the result is mixed, indicate that the appeal was allowed. Ignore costs orders. Where the outcome is unclear indicate other.
Options: allowed, dimissed, other
JUDGMENT EX... | INSTRUCTIONS: Indicate whether the following judgment excerpt from a Tax Court of Canada decision allows the appeal or dismisses the appeal. Where the result is mixed, indicate that the appeal was allowed. Ignore costs orders. Where the outcome is unclear indicate other.
Options: allowed, dimissed, other
JUDGMENT EXC... | canada_tax_court_outcomes |
4 | other | {'index': '4', 'text': 'Pursuant to Rule 172 of the Tax Court of Canada Rules (General Procedure), these amended reasons for judgment are issued in substitution to the reasons for judgment issued on May 26, 2015.\nUpon paragraphs [9] and [10] having been inadvertently inverted;\nThe reasons for judgment issued on May 2... | INSTRUCTIONS: Indicate whether the following judgment excerpt from a Tax Court of Canada decision allows the appeal or dismisses the appeal. Where the result is mixed, indicate that the appeal was allowed. Ignore costs orders. Where the outcome is unclear indicate other.
Options: allowed, dimissed, other
JUDGMENT EX... | INSTRUCTIONS: Indicate whether the following judgment excerpt from a Tax Court of Canada decision allows the appeal or dismisses the appeal. Where the result is mixed, indicate that the appeal was allowed. Ignore costs orders. Where the outcome is unclear indicate other.
Options: allowed, dimissed, other
OUTCOME: | canada_tax_court_outcomes |
8 | allowed | {'index': 8, 'text': "[TRANSLATION] The father took care of his children while they were with him. During weekday overnight stays, he would eat dinner with them and prepare their school lunches for the next day. He made sure they did their homework in the evening. The father attended some of the children's activities, ... | INSTRUCTIONS: Indicate whether the following judgment excerpt from a Tax Court of Canada decision allows the appeal or dismisses the appeal. Where the result is mixed, indicate that the appeal was allowed. Ignore costs orders. Where the outcome is unclear indicate other.
Options: allowed, dimissed, other
JUDGMENT EX... | INSTRUCTIONS: Indicate whether the following judgment excerpt from a Tax Court of Canada decision allows the appeal or dismisses the appeal. Where the result is mixed, indicate that the appeal was allowed. Ignore costs orders. Where the outcome is unclear indicate other.
Options: allowed, dimissed, other
JUDGMENT EXC... | canada_tax_court_outcomes |
6 | dismissed | {'index': 6, 'text': 'The appeal with respect to assessments made under the Income Tax Act for the Appellant’s 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009 taxation years is therefore dismissed. No costs shall be awarded. Signed at Timmins, Ontario, this 9th day of April 2024. (Brereton v The King, https://decision.tcc-cci.gc.ca/tcc-cci/... | INSTRUCTIONS: Indicate whether the following judgment excerpt from a Tax Court of Canada decision allows the appeal or dismisses the appeal. Where the result is mixed, indicate that the appeal was allowed. Ignore costs orders. Where the outcome is unclear indicate other.
Options: allowed, dimissed, other
JUDGMENT EX... | INSTRUCTIONS: Indicate whether the following judgment excerpt from a Tax Court of Canada decision allows the appeal or dismisses the appeal. Where the result is mixed, indicate that the appeal was allowed. Ignore costs orders. Where the outcome is unclear indicate other.
Options: allowed, dimissed, other
JUDGMENT EXC... | canada_tax_court_outcomes |
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio
README.md exists but content is empty.
- Downloads last month
- 4