Link paper to dataset card

#1
by nielsr HF Staff - opened
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +6 -6
README.md CHANGED
@@ -2,8 +2,11 @@
2
  language:
3
  - uk
4
  license: cc-by-nc-sa-4.0
 
 
5
  task_categories:
6
  - text-retrieval
 
7
  tags:
8
  - legal
9
  - court-decisions
@@ -12,9 +15,6 @@ tags:
12
  - ukrainian
13
  - benchmark
14
  - temporal-degradation
15
- pretty_name: UA-StatuteRetrieval
16
- size_categories:
17
- - 1K<n<10K
18
  configs:
19
  - config_name: ablation_comparison
20
  data_files:
@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ dataset_info:
91
 
92
  A large-scale benchmark for evaluating temporal stability of legal statute retrieval methods. Ground truth is derived exhaustively from 396 million codex-article citations extracted from 101 million Ukrainian court decisions (2007--2026).
93
 
94
- **Paper:** *Temporal Decay of Co-Citation Predictability: A 20-Year Statute Retrieval Benchmark from 396M Ukrainian Court Citations* (Ovcharov, 2025)
95
 
96
  ## Dataset Configs
97
 
@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ A large-scale benchmark for evaluating temporal stability of legal statute retri
105
  ## Key Findings
106
 
107
  1. **Co-citation predictability decays 33--47% over 12 years** (Mann-Kendall p < 0.005)
108
- 2. **Decay is non-uniform**: criminal procedure remains stable (MRR ~0.40); civil law degrades from 0.35 to 0.15
109
  3. **Neither BM25 nor dense retrieval (E5-large, BGE-M3) escapes temporal degradation**
110
  4. **Sliding-window mitigation improves MRR by 3--28%** over cumulative indexing
111
 
@@ -178,4 +178,4 @@ Derived from the Ukrainian Unified State Register of Court Decisions (EDRSR, htt
178
  ## Related Datasets
179
 
180
  - [overthelex/ua-court-citation-graph](https://huggingface.co/datasets/overthelex/ua-court-citation-graph) -- Co-citation graph (99.5M decisions)
181
- - [overthelex/ukrainian-court-decisions](https://huggingface.co/datasets/overthelex/ukrainian-court-decisions) -- Court decision metadata
 
2
  language:
3
  - uk
4
  license: cc-by-nc-sa-4.0
5
+ size_categories:
6
+ - 1K<n<10K
7
  task_categories:
8
  - text-retrieval
9
+ pretty_name: UA-StatuteRetrieval
10
  tags:
11
  - legal
12
  - court-decisions
 
15
  - ukrainian
16
  - benchmark
17
  - temporal-degradation
 
 
 
18
  configs:
19
  - config_name: ablation_comparison
20
  data_files:
 
91
 
92
  A large-scale benchmark for evaluating temporal stability of legal statute retrieval methods. Ground truth is derived exhaustively from 396 million codex-article citations extracted from 101 million Ukrainian court decisions (2007--2026).
93
 
94
+ **Paper:** [Temporal Decay of Co-Citation Predictability: A 20-Year Statute Retrieval Benchmark from 396M Ukrainian Court Citations](https://huggingface.co/papers/2605.17639) (Ovcharov, 2025)
95
 
96
  ## Dataset Configs
97
 
 
105
  ## Key Findings
106
 
107
  1. **Co-citation predictability decays 33--47% over 12 years** (Mann-Kendall p < 0.005)
108
+ 2. **Decay is non-uniform**: criminal procedure maintains stable co-citation patterns (MRR ~0.40); civil law degrades from 0.35 to 0.15
109
  3. **Neither BM25 nor dense retrieval (E5-large, BGE-M3) escapes temporal degradation**
110
  4. **Sliding-window mitigation improves MRR by 3--28%** over cumulative indexing
111
 
 
178
  ## Related Datasets
179
 
180
  - [overthelex/ua-court-citation-graph](https://huggingface.co/datasets/overthelex/ua-court-citation-graph) -- Co-citation graph (99.5M decisions)
181
+ - [overthelex/ukrainian-court-decisions](https://huggingface.co/datasets/overthelex/ukrainian-court-decisions) -- Court decision metadata