LegalViz: Legal Text Visualization by Text To Diagram Generation
Paper • 2502.06147 • Published
ID stringlengths 1 4 | case_name stringclasses 47
values | case_number stringclasses 90
values | document_url stringlengths 73 136 | year stringdate 1963-01-01 00:00:00 2019-01-01 00:00:00 | graphviz stringlengths 205 4.49k | language stringclasses 23
values | legal_text stringlengths 99 4.09k |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 July 2019.
Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs v The Chancellor, Masters and Scholars of the University of Cambridge.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Appeal (England & Wales) (Civil Division).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Value added... | Case C-316/18. | https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/SK/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62018CJ0316 | 2019 |
digraph {
rankdir=LR;
node [shape=box];
"University of Cambridge" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"Komisári" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"University of Cambridge" -> "Komisári" [label="Požiadala daňový úrad o odpočítanie DPH v súvislosti s poplatkami uhradenými za správu príslušného fondu."];
"Komi... | Slovak | Činnosť univerzity v Cambridge je čiastočne financovaná prostredníctvom darov a grantov, ktoré sú vložené do fondu a následne investované. Tento fond spravuje tretia osoba. V marci 2009 táto univerzita požiadala daňový úrad o odpočítanie DPH v súvislosti s poplatkami uhradenými za správu príslušného fondu za obdobie od... |
2 | Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 July 2019.
Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs v The Chancellor, Masters and Scholars of the University of Cambridge.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Appeal (England & Wales) (Civil Division).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Value added... | Case C-316/18. | https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/SL/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62018CJ0316 | 2019 | digraph {
rankdir=LR;
node [shape=box];
"University of Cambridge" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"Davčna uprava" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"University of Cambridge" -> "Davčna uprava" [label="Univerza je marca 2009 od davčne uprave zahtevala odbitek DDV od provizij, ki jih je plačala in ki se nanašaj... | Slovenian | Dejavnosti univerze v Cambridgeu se deloma financirajo iz donacij in dotacij, ki se dajo v sklad in potem investirajo. Ta sklad upravlja tretja oseba. Ta univerza je marca 2009 od davčne uprave zahtevala odbitek DDV od provizij, ki jih je plačala in ki se nanašajo na upravljanje zadevnega sklada za obdobja od 1. aprila... |
3 | Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 July 2019.
Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs v The Chancellor, Masters and Scholars of the University of Cambridge.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Appeal (England & Wales) (Civil Division).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Value added... | Case C-316/18. | https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/FI/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62018CJ0316 | 2019 |
digraph {
rankdir=LR;
node [shape=box];
"University of Cambridge" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"Komission jäsenet" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"University of Cambridge" -> "Komission jäsenet" [label="Kyseinen yliopisto pyysi maaliskuussa 2009 verohallinnolta vapautusta arvonlisäverosta, joka koski k... | Finnish | Cambridgen yliopiston toiminta rahoitetaan osittain lahjoilla ja lahjoituksilla, jotka siirretään rahastoon ja sijoitetaan. Tätä rahastoa hoitaa kolmas osapuoli. Kyseinen yliopisto pyysi maaliskuussa 2009 verohallinnolta vapautusta arvonlisäverosta, joka koski kyseisen rahaston hoitoon liittyviä maksuja, jotka oli maks... |
4 | Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 July 2019.
Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs v The Chancellor, Masters and Scholars of the University of Cambridge.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Appeal (England & Wales) (Civil Division).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Value added... | Case C-316/18. | https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/SV/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62018CJ0316 | 2019 |
digraph {
rankdir=LR;
node [shape=box];
"University of Cambridge" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"Kommissionärerna" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"University of Cambridge" -> "Kommissionärerna" [label="yrkade universitetet avdrag för den mervärdesskatt som hänför sig till de avgifter som betalats för fö... | Swedish | Verksamheten vid universitetet i Cambridge finansieras delvis genom donationer och anslag, som placeras i en fond och sedan investeras. Fonden förvaltas av en utomstående aktör. I mars 2009 yrkade universitetet avdrag för den mervärdesskatt som hänför sig till de avgifter som betalats för förvaltningen av den berörda f... |
5 | Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 July 2019.
Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs v The Chancellor, Masters and Scholars of the University of Cambridge.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Appeal (England & Wales) (Civil Division).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Value added... | Case C-316/18. | https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62018CJ0316 | 2019 | digraph {
rankdir=LR;
node [shape=box];
"University of Cambridge" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"Commissioners" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) (United Kingdom)" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber) (United Kingdom)" [shape=doubleoctagon];
... | English | The University of Cambridge challenged the Commissioners’ decision before the First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) (United Kingdom). That tribunal found that the fees for the management of the fund concerned were expenditure incurred for the purposes of the University of Cambridge’s economic activities and, therefore, tha... |
6 | Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 July 2019.
Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs v The Chancellor, Masters and Scholars of the University of Cambridge.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Appeal (England & Wales) (Civil Division).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Value added... | Case C-316/18. | https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/BG/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62018CJ0316 | 2019 | digraph {
rankdir=LR;
node [shape=box];
"University of Cambridge" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"данъчната администрация" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"First-tier Tribunal (данъчно отделение) (Обединено кралство)" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"Upper Tribunal (данъчно и финансово отделение) (Обединено кралство... | Bulgarian | Кеймбриджкият университет обжалва решението на посочената администрация пред First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) (Първоинстанционен съд (данъчно отделение), Обединено кралство). Като приема, че разходите за управлението на разглеждания фонд са представлявали разходи, направени за целите на икономическите дейности на Кейм... |
7 | Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 July 2019.
Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs v The Chancellor, Masters and Scholars of the University of Cambridge.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Appeal (England & Wales) (Civil Division).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Value added... | Case C-316/18. | https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/ES/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62018CJ0316 | 2019 | digraph {
rankdir=LR;
node [shape=box];
"University of Cambridge" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"Administración tributaria" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"First-tier Tribunal (Sala de asuntos tributarios) (Reino Unido)" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"Upper Tribunal (Sala de Asuntos Tributarios y de los mercados... | Spanish | La Universidad de Cambridge impugnó la resolución de la Administración tributaria ante el First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) [Tribunal de Primera Instancia de lo Contencioso-Administrativo (Sala de asuntos tributarios), Reino Unido]. Dicho órgano jurisdiccional consideró que las comisiones relativas a la gestión del fon... |
8 | Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 July 2019.
Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs v The Chancellor, Masters and Scholars of the University of Cambridge.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Appeal (England & Wales) (Civil Division).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Value added... | Case C-316/18. | https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/CS/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62018CJ0316 | 2019 | digraph {
rankdir=LR;
node [shape=box];
"University of Cambridge" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"daňová správa" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"First-tier Tribunal (daňový senát) (Spojené království)" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"Upper Tribunal (daňový a obchodní senát) (Spojené království)" [shape=doubleoctag... | Czech | Univerzita v Cambridge napadla rozhodnutí daňové správy u First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) [soud prvního stupně (daňový senát), Spojené království]. Tento soud dospěl k názoru, že poplatky za správu dotyčného fondu představují výdaje vynaložené pro účely ekonomické činnosti univerzity v Cambridge, takže z toho důvodu ... |
9 | Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 July 2019.
Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs v The Chancellor, Masters and Scholars of the University of Cambridge.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Appeal (England & Wales) (Civil Division).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Value added... | Case C-316/18. | https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/DA/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62018CJ0316 | 2019 | digraph {
rankdir=LR;
node [shape=box];
"University of Cambridge" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"afgiftsmyndigheden" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"First-tier Tribunal (afdelingen for sager om skatter og afgifter) (Det Forenede Kongerige)" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"Upper Tribunal (afdelingen for skatter og... | Danish | University of Cambridge indbragte nævnte myndigheds afgørelse for First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) (ret i første instans (afdelingen for sager om skatter og afgifter), Det Forenede Kongerige). Denne ret fandt, at honoraret for forvaltningen af den pågældende fond udgjorde udgifter afholdt til brug for University of Ca... |
10 | Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 July 2019.
Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs v The Chancellor, Masters and Scholars of the University of Cambridge.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Appeal (England & Wales) (Civil Division).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Value added... | Case C-316/18. | https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/DE/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62018CJ0316 | 2019 |
digraph {
rankdir=LR;
node [shape=box];
"University of Cambridge" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"Kommissare" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"First-tier Tribunal (Kammer für Steuersachen) (Vereinigtes Königreich)" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"Upper Tribunal (Kammer für Steuer- und Finanzsachen) (Vereinigtes Kö... | German | Die Universität Cambridge focht diese Entscheidung vor dem First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) (Gericht erster Instanz [Kammer für Steuersachen], Vereinigtes Königreich) an. Dieses Gericht, das die Auffassung vertrat, dass die Fondsverwaltungsgebühren Aufwendungen für die wirtschaftlichen Tätigkeiten der Universität Camb... |
11 | Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 July 2019.
Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs v The Chancellor, Masters and Scholars of the University of Cambridge.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Appeal (England & Wales) (Civil Division).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Value added... | Case C-316/18. | https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/ET/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62018CJ0316 | 2019 |
digraph {
rankdir=LR;
node [shape=box];
"University of Cambridge" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"Volinikud" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"First-tier Tribunal (maksukolleegium) (Ühendkuningriik)" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"Upper Tribunal (maksu- ja kaubanduskolleegium) (Ühendkuningriik)" [shape=doubleoctag... | Estonian | Cambridge’i ülikool vaidlustas maksuhalduri otsuse First-tier Tribunalis (Tax Chamber) (esimese astme kohus (maksukolleegium), Ühendkuningriik). Kuna kohus leidis, et asjaomase fondi haldamisega seotud teenustasu kujutab endast Cambridge’i ülikooli majandustegevusega seotud kulu ning et seetõttu moodustab see kulu teat... |
12 | Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 July 2019.
Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs v The Chancellor, Masters and Scholars of the University of Cambridge.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Appeal (England & Wales) (Civil Division).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Value added... | Case C-316/18. | https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EL/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62018CJ0316 | 2019 |
digraph {
rankdir=LR;
node [shape=box];
"University of Cambridge" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"Επίτροποι" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"First-tier Tribunal (φορολογικό τμήμα) (Ηνωμένο Βασίλειο)" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"Upper Tribunal (τμήμα φορολογίας και κτηματολογίου) (Ηνωμένο Βασίλειο)" [shape=dou... | Greek | Το πανεπιστήμιο του Cambridge προσέβαλε την απόφαση της εν λόγω διοίκησης ενώπιον του First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) [πρωτοδικείου διοικητικών διαφορών (φορολογικό τμήμα), Ηνωμένο Βασίλειο]. Το ως άνω δικαστήριο, φρονώντας ότι οι προμήθειες για τη διαχείριση του εν λόγω ταμείου αποτελούν δαπάνες στις οποίες το πανεπ... |
13 | Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 July 2019.
Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs v The Chancellor, Masters and Scholars of the University of Cambridge.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Appeal (England & Wales) (Civil Division).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Value added... | Case C-316/18. | https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/FR/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62018CJ0316 | 2019 | digraph {
rankdir=LR;
node [shape=box];
"University of Cambridge" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"commissions" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"First-tier Tribunal (chambre de la fiscalité) (Royaume-Uni)" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"Upper Tribunal (chambre de la fiscalité et de la Chancery) (Royaume-Uni)" [shap... | French | L’université de Cambridge a contesté la décision de ladite administration devant le First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) [tribunal de première instance (chambre de la fiscalité), Royaume-Uni]. Cette juridiction, considérant que les commissions relatives à la gestion du fonds concerné constituaient des dépenses exposées po... |
14 | Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 July 2019.
Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs v The Chancellor, Masters and Scholars of the University of Cambridge.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Appeal (England & Wales) (Civil Division).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Value added... | Case C-316/18. | https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/HR/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62018CJ0316 | 2019 | digraph {
rankdir=LR;
node [shape=box];
"University of Cambridge" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"porezna uprava" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"First-tier Tribunal (Odjel za poreze) (Ujedinjena Kraljevina)" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"Upper Tribunal (Odjel za poreze i Chancery) (Ujedinjena Kraljevina)" [shap... | Croatian | Sveučilište u Cambridgeu je osporavalo odluku navedene uprave pred First‑tier Tribunalom (Tax Chamber) (Prvostupanjski sud, Odjel za poreze, Ujedinjena Kraljevina). Taj je sud, smatrajući da naknade za upravljanje dotičnim fondom predstavljaju troškove nastale za potrebe gospodarskih aktivnosti Sveučilišta u Cambridgeu... |
15 | Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 July 2019.
Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs v The Chancellor, Masters and Scholars of the University of Cambridge.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Appeal (England & Wales) (Civil Division).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Value added... | Case C-316/18. | https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/IT/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62018CJ0316 | 2019 |
digraph {
rankdir=LR;
node [shape=box];
"University of Cambridge" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"Commissari" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"First-tier Tribunal (sezione tributaria) (Regno Unito)" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"Upper Tribunal (sezione tributaria e del pubblico registro e della cancelleria) (Reg... | Italian | L’università di Cambridge contestava la decisione di detta amministrazione dinanzi al First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) [Tribunale di primo grado (sezione tributaria), Regno Unito]. Tale giudice, considerando che i compensi relativi alla gestione del fondo di cui trattasi costituivano spese sostenute per le esigenze de... |
16 | Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 July 2019.
Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs v The Chancellor, Masters and Scholars of the University of Cambridge.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Appeal (England & Wales) (Civil Division).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Value added... | Case C-316/18. | https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/LV/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62018CJ0316 | 2019 | digraph {
rankdir=LR;
node [shape=box];
"University of Cambridge" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"komisijas" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"First-tier Tribunal (Nodokļu lietu palāta) (Apvienotā Karaliste)" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"Upper Tribunal (Nodokļu un kanclera kompetences lietu palāta) (Apvienotā Kar... | Latvian | Par minētās administrācijas lēmumu Kembridžas Universitāte cēla prasību First‑tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) (Administratīvā pirmās instances tiesa (Nodokļu lietu palāta), Apvienotā Karaliste). Šī tiesa, uzskatīdama, ka komisijas maksas, kas saistītas ar attiecīgā fonda pārvaldību, ir izdevumi, kuri izdarīti Kembridžas Un... |
17 | Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 July 2019.
Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs v The Chancellor, Masters and Scholars of the University of Cambridge.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Appeal (England & Wales) (Civil Division).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Value added... | Case C-316/18. | https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/LT/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62018CJ0316 | 2019 | digraph {
rankdir=LR;
node [shape=box];
"University of Cambridge" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"mokesčių administratorius" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"First-tier Tribunal (mokesčių bylų skyrius) (Jungtinė Karalystė)" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"Upper Tribunal (Mokesčių ir lordo kanclerio skyrius) (Jungti... | Lithuanian | Kembridžo universitetas apskundė minėtą sprendimą First‑tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) (Pirmosios instancijos teismas (mokesčių bylų skyrius), Jungtinė Karalystė). Šis teismas, atsižvelgdamas į tai, kad komisiniai mokesčiai už atitinkamo fondo valdymą sudarė išlaidas, kurios patirtos Kembridžo universiteto ekonominės veik... |
18 | Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 July 2019.
Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs v The Chancellor, Masters and Scholars of the University of Cambridge.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Appeal (England & Wales) (Civil Division).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Value added... | Case C-316/18. | https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/HU/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62018CJ0316 | 2019 |
digraph {
rankdir=LR;
node [shape=box];
"University of Cambridge" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"Biztosok" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"First-tier Tribunal (adójogi tanács) (Egyesült Királyság)" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"Upper Tribunal (adóügyi és kancelláriai tanács) (Egyesült Királyság)" [shape=double... | Hungarian | A cambridge‑i egyetem a First‑tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) (elsőfokú bíróság [adójogi tanács], Egyesült Királyság) előtt vitatta az említett adóhatóság határozatát. E bíróság, miután megállapította, hogy az érintett alap kezeléséhez kapcsolódó díjak a cambridge‑i egyetem gazdasági tevékenységeinek szükségletei körében f... |
19 | Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 July 2019.
Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs v The Chancellor, Masters and Scholars of the University of Cambridge.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Appeal (England & Wales) (Civil Division).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Value added... | Case C-316/18. | https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/MT/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62018CJ0316 | 2019 | digraph {
rankdir=LR;
node [shape=box];
"University of Cambridge" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"kummissjonijiet" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"First-tier Tribunal (Awla Fiskali) (ir-Renju Unit)" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"Upper Tribunal (Awla tat-Taxxa u tal-Ekwità) (ir-Renju Unit)" [shape=doubleoctagon];... | Maltese | L-Università ta’ Cambridge ikkontestat id-deċiżjoni tal-imsemmija amministrazzjoni quddiem il-First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) (il-Qorti tal-Ewwel Istanza (Awla Fiskali), ir-Renju Unit). Din il-qorti, peress li qieset li l-kummissjonijiet għall-ġestjoni tal-fond ikkonċernat kienu jikkostitwixxu spejjeż sostnuti għall-... |
20 | Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 July 2019.
Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs v The Chancellor, Masters and Scholars of the University of Cambridge.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Appeal (England & Wales) (Civil Division).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Value added... | Case C-316/18. | https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/NL/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62018CJ0316 | 2019 | digraph {
rankdir=LR;
node [shape=box];
"University of Cambridge" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"belastingdienst" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"First-tier Tribunal (belastingrechter) (Verenigd Koninkrijk)" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"Upper Tribunal (belastingrechter in tweede aanleg) (Verenigd Koninkrijk)" ... | Dutch | De universiteit van Cambridge heeft de beslissing van die dienst aangevochten bij de First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) [belastingrechter in eerste aanleg, Verenigd Koninkrijk]. Die rechter heeft de vordering van de universiteit van Cambridge toegewezen en heeft geoordeeld dat de beheersvergoedingen voor het betrokken f... |
21 | Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 July 2019.
Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs v The Chancellor, Masters and Scholars of the University of Cambridge.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Appeal (England & Wales) (Civil Division).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Value added... | Case C-316/18. | https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/PL/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62018CJ0316 | 2019 |
digraph {
rankdir=LR;
node [shape=box];
"University of Cambridge" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"Komisarze" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"First-tier Tribunal (izba podatkowa) (Zjednoczone Królestwo)" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"Upper Tribunal (izbę podatkową i kanclerską) (Zjednoczone Królestwo)" [shape=do... | Polish | Uniwersytet w Cambridge zaskarżył decyzję tego organu do First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) [sądu pierwszej instancji (izby podatkowej), Zjednoczone Królestwo]. Sąd ten, uznając, że opłaty za zarządzanie funduszem stanowiły wydatki poniesione na potrzeby działalności gospodarczej uniwersytetu w Cambridge oraz że z tego ... |
22 | Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 July 2019.
Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs v The Chancellor, Masters and Scholars of the University of Cambridge.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Appeal (England & Wales) (Civil Division).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Value added... | Case C-316/18. | https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/PT/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62018CJ0316 | 2019 | digraph {
rankdir=LR;
node [shape=box];
"University of Cambridge" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"Administração Fiscal" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"First-tier Tribunal (Secção Tributária) (Reino Unido)" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"Upper Tribunal (Secção Tributária e da Chancelaria) (Reino Unido)" [shape=do... | Portuguese | A Universidade de Cambridge impugnou a decisão da Administração Fiscal no First‑tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) [Tribunal de Primeira Instância (Secção Tributária), Reino Unido]. Este tribunal, considerando que as comissões de gestão do fundo em causa constituíam despesas realizadas para a realização das atividades económi... |
23 | Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 July 2019.
Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs v The Chancellor, Masters and Scholars of the University of Cambridge.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Appeal (England & Wales) (Civil Division).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Value added... | Case C-316/18. | https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/RO/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62018CJ0316 | 2019 | digraph {
rankdir=LR;
node [shape=box];
"University of Cambridge" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"comisioanele" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"First-tier Tribunal (Camera fiscală) (Regatul Unit)" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"Upper Tribunal (Camera fiscală și a cancelariei) (Regatul Unit)" [shape=doubleoctagon]... | Romanian | Universitatea din Cambridge a contestat decizia respectivei administrații la First‑tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) [Tribunalul de Primă Instanță (Camera fiscală), Regatul Unit]. Această instanță, considerând că comisioanele referitoare la administrarea fondului în cauză constituiau cheltuieli suportate pentru nevoile activ... |
24 | Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 July 2019.
Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs v The Chancellor, Masters and Scholars of the University of Cambridge.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Appeal (England & Wales) (Civil Division).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Value added... | Case C-316/18. | https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/SK/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62018CJ0316 | 2019 |
digraph {
rankdir=LR;
node [shape=box];
"University of Cambridge" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"Napadol rozhodnutie komisárov" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"First-tier Tribunal (daňový senát) (Spojené kráľovstvo)" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"Upper Tribunal (oddelenie pre daňové a majetkové spory) (Spojené... | Slovak | Univerzita v Cambridge napadla rozhodnutie uvedeného úradu na First‑tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) [prvostupňový súd (daňový senát), Spojené kráľovstvo]. Tento súd, ktorý zastával názor, že poplatky za správu príslušného fondu predstavujú výdavky vynaložené pre potreby hospodárskej činnosti univerzity v Cambridge a ako ta... |
25 | Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 July 2019.
Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs v The Chancellor, Masters and Scholars of the University of Cambridge.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Appeal (England & Wales) (Civil Division).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Value added... | Case C-316/18. | https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/SL/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62018CJ0316 | 2019 | digraph {
rankdir=LR;
node [shape=box];
"University of Cambridge" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"davčna uprava" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"First-tier Tribunal (davčni oddelek) (Združeno kraljestvo)" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"Upper Tribunal (oddelek za davčne in gospodarske spore) (Združeno kraljestvo)"... | Slovenian | Univerza v Cambridgeu je odločbo te uprave izpodbijala pri First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) (prvostopenjsko sodišče (davčni oddelek), Združeno kraljestvo). To sodišče je ocenilo, da so bile provizije v zvezi z upravljanjem zadevnega sklada stroški za potrebe ekonomskih dejavnosti univerze v Cambridgeu in da so bili iz... |
26 | Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 July 2019.
Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs v The Chancellor, Masters and Scholars of the University of Cambridge.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Appeal (England & Wales) (Civil Division).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Value added... | Case C-316/18. | https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/FI/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62018CJ0316 | 2019 | digraph {
rankdir=LR;
node [shape=box];
"University of Cambridge" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"verohallinto" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"First-tier Tribunal (verojaosto) (Yhdistynyt kuningaskunta)" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"Upper Tribunal (vero- ja sosiaalijaosto) (Yhdistynyt kuningaskunta)" [shape=do... | Finnish | Cambridgen yliopisto riitautti tämän päätöksen First-tier Tribunalissa (Tax Chamber) (alioikeus, verojaosto; Yhdistynyt kuningaskunta). Kyseinen tuomioistuin katsoi, että mainitun rahaston hoidosta aiheutuneet maksut olivat Cambridgen yliopiston liiketoimintaan liittyviä tarpeita koskevia kuluja ja että tällä perusteel... |
27 | Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 July 2019.
Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs v The Chancellor, Masters and Scholars of the University of Cambridge.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Appeal (England & Wales) (Civil Division).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Value added... | Case C-316/18. | https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/SV/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62018CJ0316 | 2019 | digraph {
rankdir=LR;
node [shape=box];
"University of Cambridge" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"skattemyndigheten" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"First-tier Tribunal (skatteavdelningen) (Förenade kungariket)" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"Upper Tribunal (skatte- och finansavdelningen) (Förenade kungariket)" [... | Swedish | Universitetet i Cambridge överklagade skattemyndighetens beslut till First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) (förstainstansdomstolen (skatteavdelningen), Förenade kungariket). Då förstainstansdomstolen fann att avgifterna för förvaltningen av den berörda fonden utgjorde kostnader för den ekonomiska verksamheten vid universit... |
28 | Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Criminal proceedings against Emil Milev.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive (EU) 2016/343 — P... | Case C-310/18 PPU. | https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62018CJ0310 | 2019 | digraph {
rankdir=LR;
node [shape=box];
"Bulgarian court" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"Bulgarian court" -> "Refused to place Mr Milev in pre-trial detention";
"Refused to place Mr Milev in pre-trial detention" -> "The first case concerning a bank robbery with violence";
"Refused to place Mr... | English | The referring court states that, in the first of those cases, which concerns a bank robbery with violence, a Bulgarian court refused to place Mr Milev in pre-trial detention (remand him in custody), on the ground that the statements of the main prosecution witness, Mr BP, were not credible. A judicial decision as to th... |
29 | Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Criminal proceedings against Emil Milev.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive (EU) 2016/343 — P... | Case C-310/18 PPU. | https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/BG/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62018CJ0310 | 2019 | digraph {
rankdir=LR;
node [shape=box];
"българският съд" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"българският съд" -> "отказва да задържи под стража г‑н Милев";
"отказва да задържи под стража г‑н Милев" -> "първото от тях за участие в грабеж на банка";
"отказва да задържи под стража г‑н Милев" -> "Пок... | Bulgarian | Във връзка с първото от тях за участие в грабеж на банка тя посочва, че българският съд отказва да задържи под стража г‑н Милев, тъй като показанията на основния свидетел на обвинението, г‑н BP, са недостоверни. Все още не е постановен акт по същество по това дело. |
30 | Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Criminal proceedings against Emil Milev.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive (EU) 2016/343 — P... | Case C-310/18 PPU. | https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/ES/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62018CJ0310 | 2019 | digraph {
rankdir=LR;
node [shape=box];
"un tribunal búlgaro" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"un tribunal búlgaro" -> "rechazó decretar el ingreso en prisión preventiva del Sr. Milev";
"rechazó decretar el ingreso en prisión preventiva del Sr. Milev" -> "en el primero de ellos, referido a un robo ... | Spanish | Dicho órgano jurisdiccional indica que, en el primero de ellos, referido a un robo con violencia a un banco, un tribunal búlgaro rechazó decretar el ingreso en prisión preventiva del Sr. Milev, dada la falta de credibilidad del testimonio prestado por el principal testigo de cargo, el Sr. BP. Aún no ha recaído ninguna ... |
31 | Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Criminal proceedings against Emil Milev.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive (EU) 2016/343 — P... | Case C-310/18 PPU. | https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/CS/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62018CJ0310 | 2019 | digraph {
rankdir=LR;
node [shape=box];
"bulharský soud" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"bulharský soud" -> "odmítl vzít E. Mileva do vazby";
"odmítl vzít E. Mileva do vazby" -> "První z těchto řízení, jež se týká loupeže v bance";
"odmítl vzít E. Mileva do vazby" -> "výpověď hlavního svědka, ... | Czech | Ohledně prvního z těchto řízení, jež se týká loupeže v bance, předkládající soud uvádí, že bulharský soud odmítl vzít E. Mileva do vazby vzhledem k tomu, že výpověď hlavního svědka, BP, nebyla věrohodná. V této věci zatím nebylo vydáno žádné meritorní soudní rozhodnutí. |
32 | Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Criminal proceedings against Emil Milev.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive (EU) 2016/343 — P... | Case C-310/18 PPU. | https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/DA/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62018CJ0310 | 2019 | digraph {
rankdir=LR;
node [shape=box];
"bulgarsk ret" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"bulgarsk ret" -> "afviste at varetægtsfængsle Emil Milev";
"afviste at varetægtsfængsle Emil Milev" -> "I den første af disse sager vedrørende et røveri af en bank";
"afviste at varetægtsfængsle Emil Milev" ... | Danish | I den første af disse sager vedrørende et røveri af en bank har den forelæggende ret anført, at en bulgarsk ret afslog at varetægtsfængsle Emil Milev, fordi vidneudsagnene fra anklagemyndighedens hovedvidne, BP, ikke var troværdige. Der er endnu ikke blevet truffet nogen retslig afgørelse om realiteten i den nævnte sag... |
33 | Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Criminal proceedings against Emil Milev.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive (EU) 2016/343 — P... | Case C-310/18 PPU. | https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/DE/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62018CJ0310 | 2019 | digraph {
rankdir=LR;
node [shape=box];
"bulgarisches Gericht" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"bulgarisches Gericht" -> "habe ein bulgarisches Gericht die Anordnung von Untersuchungshaft gegen Herrn Milev mit der Begründung abgelehnt";
"habe ein bulgarisches Gericht die Anordnung von Untersuchungs... | German | Im ersten dieser Verfahren, das einen Bankraub betreffe, habe ein bulgarisches Gericht die Anordnung von Untersuchungshaft gegen Herrn Milev mit der Begründung abgelehnt, dass die Aussage des Hauptbelastungszeugen, Herrn BP, nicht glaubhaft sei. Eine gerichtliche Entscheidung in der Sache sei in diesem Verfahren noch n... |
34 | Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Criminal proceedings against Emil Milev.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive (EU) 2016/343 — P... | Case C-310/18 PPU. | https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/ET/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62018CJ0310 | 2019 | digraph {
rankdir=LR;
node [shape=box];
"Bulgaaria kohus" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"Bulgaaria kohus" -> "keeldus E. Milevit vahistamast";
"keeldus E. Milevit vahistamast" -> "Esimese kriminaalasja kohta, mis puudutab pangaröövi";
"keeldus E. Milevit vahistamast" -> "Põhitunnistaja BP ütl... | Estonian | Esimese kriminaalasja kohta, mis puudutab pangaröövi, täheldab ta, et Bulgaaria kohus keeldus E. Milevit vahistamast põhjusel, et põhitunnistaja BP ütlused ei olnud usaldusväärsed. Selles kohtuasjas ei ole veel tehtud mingit sisulist otsust. |
35 | Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Criminal proceedings against Emil Milev.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive (EU) 2016/343 — P... | Case C-310/18 PPU. | https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EL/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62018CJ0310 | 2019 | digraph {
rankdir=LR;
node [shape=box];
"αιτούν δικαστήριο" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"αιτούν δικαστήριο" -> "το αιτούν δικαστήριο αρνήθηκε να θέσει τον ο E. Milev υπό προσωρινή κράτηση";
"το αιτούν δικαστήριο αρνήθηκε να θέσει τον ο E. Milev υπό προσωρινή κράτηση" -> "Στο πλαίσιο της πρώτης ... | Greek | Στο πλαίσιο της πρώτης από τις διαδικασίες αυτές, η οποία αφορά ληστεία τράπεζας με χρήση βίας, το αιτούν δικαστήριο αρνήθηκε να θέσει τον ο E. Milev υπό προσωρινή κράτηση, για τον λόγο ότι οι καταθέσεις του BP, βασικού μάρτυρα κατηγορίας, δεν ήταν αξιόπιστες. Στην εν λόγω υπόθεση δεν έχει ακόμη εκδοθεί δικαστική απόφα... |
36 | Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Criminal proceedings against Emil Milev.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive (EU) 2016/343 — P... | Case C-310/18 PPU. | https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/FR/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62018CJ0310 | 2019 | digraph {
rankdir=LR;
node [shape=box];
"une juridiction bulgare" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"une juridiction bulgare" -> "a refusé de placer M. Milev en détention provisoire";
"a refusé de placer M. Milev en détention provisoire" -> "Dans la première de ces affaires, relative au vol avec viol... | French | Dans la première de ces affaires, relative au vol avec violence d’une banque, elle indique qu’une juridiction bulgare a refusé de placer M. Milev en détention provisoire, au motif que les dépositions du principal témoin à charge, M. BP, n’étaient pas crédibles. Aucune décision juridictionnelle sur le fond n’a encore ét... |
37 | Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Criminal proceedings against Emil Milev.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive (EU) 2016/343 — P... | Case C-310/18 PPU. | https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/HR/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62018CJ0310 | 2019 | digraph {
rankdir=LR;
node [shape=box];
"bugarski sud" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"bugarski sud" -> "odbio E. Milevu odrediti istražni zatvor";
"odbio E. Milevu odrediti istražni zatvor" -> "On navodi da je u prvom od tih predmeta, koji se odnosi na razbojništvo banke";
"odbio E. Milevu od... | Croatian | On navodi da je u prvom od tih predmeta, koji se odnosi na razbojništvo banke, bugarski sud odbio E. Milevu odrediti istražni zatvor s obrazloženjem da iskazi glavnog svjedoka optužbe, BP‑a, nisu vjerodostojni. U navedenom predmetu još nije donesena nikakva sudska odluka o meritumu. |
38 | Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Criminal proceedings against Emil Milev.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive (EU) 2016/343 — P... | Case C-310/18 PPU. | https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/IT/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62018CJ0310 | 2019 | digraph {
rankdir=LR;
node [shape=box];
"giudice bulgaro" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"giudice bulgaro" -> "ha respinto la richiesta di sottoporre il sig. Milev alla misura della custodia cautelare";
"ha respinto la richiesta di sottoporre il sig. Milev alla misura della custodia cautelare" -> ... | Italian | Nell’ambito del primo di tali due procedimenti, relativo ad una rapina in una banca, il giudice del rinvio riferisce che un giudice bulgaro ha respinto la richiesta di sottoporre il sig. Milev alla misura della custodia cautelare, in quanto le deposizioni del principale testimone a carico, il sig. BP, non erano credibi... |
39 | Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Criminal proceedings against Emil Milev.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive (EU) 2016/343 — P... | Case C-310/18 PPU. | https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/LV/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62018CJ0310 | 2019 | digraph {
rankdir=LR;
node [shape=box];
"Bulgārijas tiesa" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"Bulgārijas tiesa" -> "Bulgārijas tiesa noraidīja apcietinājuma piemērošanu E. Milev";
"Bulgārijas tiesa noraidīja apcietinājuma piemērošanu E. Milev" -> "Pirmo no šīm lietām saistībā ar bankas aplaupīšanu";
... | Latvian | Attiecībā uz pirmo no šīm lietām saistībā ar bankas aplaupīšanu iesniedzējtiesa norāda, ka Bulgārijas tiesa noraidīja apcietinājuma piemērošanu E. Milev, motivējot ar to, ka viena no galvenajiem apsūdzības lieciniekiem BP liecības nav ticamas. Minētajā lietā vēl nav pieņemts neviens tiesas nolēmums pēc būtības. |
40 | Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Criminal proceedings against Emil Milev.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive (EU) 2016/343 — P... | Case C-310/18 PPU. | https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/LT/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62018CJ0310 | 2019 |
digraph {
rankdir=LR;
node [shape=box];
"Bulgarijos teismas" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"Bulgarijos teismas" -> "E. Milev nebuvo paleistas.";
"E. Milev nebuvo paleistas." -> "Pirmoji byla dėl smurtinio banko apiplėšimo";
"E. Milev nebuvo paleistas." -> "liudytojo BP parodymai nepatikimi."... | Lithuanian | Dėl antros baudžiamosios bylos, kurioje pagrindinis liudytojas taip pat yra BP ir kuri susijusi su vadovavimu plėšimus vykdžiusiam nusikalstamam susivienijimui, šis teismas nurodo, kad E. Milev buvo suimtas nuo 2013 m. lapkričio 24 d. iki 2018 m. sausio 9 d., t. y. nuo momento, kai buvo išteisintas dėl visų jam pareikš... |
41 | Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Criminal proceedings against Emil Milev.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive (EU) 2016/343 — P... | Case C-310/18 PPU. | https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/HU/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62018CJ0310 | 2019 |
digraph {
rankdir=LR;
node [shape=box];
"bolgár bíróság" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"bolgár bíróság" -> "E. Milevet azonban nem engedték szabadon.";
"E. Milevet azonban nem engedték szabadon." -> "Az első, erőszakkal elkövetett bankrablásra vonatkozó eset";
"E. Milevet azonban nem engedté... | Hungarian | Ami a második – rablások elkövetése céljából létrehozott bűnszervezet irányítására vonatkozó – ügyet illeti, amelyben szintén BP az elsődleges terhelő tanú, a kérdést előterjesztő bíróság jelzi, hogy E. Milevet 2013. november 24‑től 2018. január 9‑ig fogva tartották, amikor is valamennyi vádpont alól felmentették, mive... |
42 | Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Criminal proceedings against Emil Milev.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive (EU) 2016/343 — P... | Case C-310/18 PPU. | https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/MT/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62018CJ0310 | 2019 | digraph {
rankdir=LR;
node [shape=box];
"qorti Bulgara" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"qorti Bulgara" -> "Extracted sentence: E. Milev ġie arrestat mill-24 ta’ Novembru 2013 sad-9 ta’ Jannar 2018, data li fiha huwa nħeles mill-akkużi kollha miġjuba kontrih minħabba li x-xhieda ta’ BP ma kinitx meqjus... | Maltese | Fit-tieni kawża, li tikkonċerna t-tmexxija ta’ grupp kriminali organizzat sabiex jitwettaq is-serq bi vjolenza, li fil-kuntest tagħha BP huwa wkoll ix-xhud prinċipali, din tesponi li E. Milev ġie arrestat mill-24 ta’ Novembru 2013 sad-9 ta’ Jannar 2018, data li fiha huwa nħeles mill-akkużi kollha miġjuba kontrih minħab... |
43 | Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Criminal proceedings against Emil Milev.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive (EU) 2016/343 — P... | Case C-310/18 PPU. | https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/NL/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62018CJ0310 | 2019 | digraph {
rankdir=LR;
node [shape=box];
"Bulgaarse rechter" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"Bulgaarse rechter" -> "heeft geweigerd Milev in voorlopige hechtenis te nemen";
"heeft geweigerd Milev in voorlopige hechtenis te nemen" -> "In de eerste van deze zaken, die over een bankroof gaat";
"he... | Dutch | In de eerste van deze zaken, die over een bankroof gaat, wijst hij erop dat een Bulgaarse rechter heeft geweigerd Milev in voorlopige hechtenis te nemen, op grond dat de verklaringen van de belangrijkste getuige à charge, BP, niet geloofwaardig waren. In de betreffende zaak is nog geen rechterlijke beslissing ten grond... |
44 | Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Criminal proceedings against Emil Milev.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive (EU) 2016/343 — P... | Case C-310/18 PPU. | https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/PL/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62018CJ0310 | 2019 | digraph {
rankdir=LR;
node [shape=box];
"sąd bułgarski" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"sąd bułgarski" -> "sąd bułgarski odmówił zastosowania wobec E. Mileva tymczasowego aresztowania";
"sąd bułgarski odmówił zastosowania wobec E. Mileva tymczasowego aresztowania" -> "Pierwszej z tych spraw, dotyc... | Polish | Jak wskazuje, w pierwszej z tych spraw, dotyczącej rozboju dokonanego w banku, sąd bułgarski odmówił zastosowania wobec E. Mileva tymczasowego aresztowania ze względu na to, że zeznania głównego świadka oskarżenia, BP, nie były wiarygodne. W tej sprawie nie wydano jeszcze żadnego orzeczenia co do istoty. |
45 | Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Criminal proceedings against Emil Milev.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive (EU) 2016/343 — P... | Case C-310/18 PPU. | https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/PT/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62018CJ0310 | 2019 |
digraph {
rankdir=LR;
node [shape=box];
"órgão jurisdicional búlgaro" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"órgão jurisdicional búlgaro" -> "No entanto, não foi posto em liberdade.";
"No entanto, não foi posto em liberdade." -> "O primeiro caso de assalto a um banco com violência";
"No entanto, não... | Portuguese | No segundo processo, que se refere à direção de uma associação criminosa, constituída com o objetivo de cometer roubos, no âmbito da qual BP é também a principal testemunha de acusação, informa que E. Milev esteve preso de 24 de novembro de 2013 a 9 de janeiro de 2018, data em que foi absolvido de todas as acusações co... |
46 | Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Criminal proceedings against Emil Milev.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive (EU) 2016/343 — P... | Case C-310/18 PPU. | https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/RO/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62018CJ0310 | 2019 | digraph {
rankdir=LR;
node [shape=box];
"instanță bulgară" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"instanță bulgară" -> "a refuzat plasarea domnului Milev în arest preventiv";
"a refuzat plasarea domnului Milev în arest preventiv" -> "În prima dintre aceste cauze, referitoare la tâlhăria dintr‑o bancă";
... | Romanian | În prima dintre aceste cauze, referitoare la tâlhăria dintr‑o bancă, ea arată că o instanță bulgară a refuzat plasarea domnului Milev în arest preventiv, pentru motivul că depozițiile principalului martor al acuzării, domnul BP, nu erau credibile. Nicio hotărâre judecătorească pe fond nu a fost încă pronunțată în cauza... |
47 | Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Criminal proceedings against Emil Milev.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive (EU) 2016/343 — P... | Case C-310/18 PPU. | https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/SK/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62018CJ0310 | 2019 | digraph {
rankdir=LR;
node [shape=box];
"bulharský súd" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"bulharský súd" -> "odmietol vziať pána Mileva do väzby";
"odmietol vziať pána Mileva do väzby" -> "V prvej z týchto vecí týkajúcej sa bankovej lúpeže";
"odmietol vziať pána Mileva do väzby" -> "Výpovede hla... | Slovak | V prvej z týchto vecí týkajúcej sa bankovej lúpeže vnútroštátny súd uvádza, že bulharský súd odmietol vziať pána Mileva do väzby z dôvodu, že výpovede hlavného svedka v jeho neprospech, pána BP, neboli vierohodné. Nijaké súdne rozhodnutie vo veci samej ešte nebolo v uvedenej veci vydané. |
48 | Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Criminal proceedings against Emil Milev.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive (EU) 2016/343 — P... | Case C-310/18 PPU. | https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/SL/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62018CJ0310 | 2019 | digraph {
rankdir=LR;
node [shape=box];
"bolgarsko sodišče" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"bolgarsko sodišče" -> "bolgarsko sodišče zavrnilo odreditev pripora E. Mileva";
"bolgarsko sodišče zavrnilo odreditev pripora E. Mileva" -> "V prvem od teh postopkov, ki se nanaša na rop banke";
"bolgar... | Slovenian | V prvem od teh postopkov, ki se nanaša na rop banke, predložitveno sodišče navaja, da je bolgarsko sodišče zavrnilo odreditev pripora E. Mileva, ker izpovedbe glavne obremenilne priče, osebe BP, niso bile verodostojne. V navedenem postopku še ni bila izdana nobena meritorna sodna odločba. |
49 | Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Criminal proceedings against Emil Milev.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive (EU) 2016/343 — P... | Case C-310/18 PPU. | https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/FI/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62018CJ0310 | 2019 | digraph {
rankdir=LR;
node [shape=box];
"bulgarialainen tuomioistuin" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"bulgarialainen tuomioistuin" -> "on kieltäytynyt määräämästä Mileviä tutkintavankeuteen";
"on kieltäytynyt määräämästä Mileviä tutkintavankeuteen" -> "Ensimmäisessä, joka koskee pankkiryöstöä";
... | Finnish | Ennakkoratkaisua pyytänyt tuomioistuin toteaa, että näistä ensimmäisessä, joka koskee pankkiryöstöä, bulgarialainen tuomioistuin on kieltäytynyt määräämästä Mileviä tutkintavankeuteen sillä perusteella, etteivät Mileviä vastaan todistaneen päätodistajan BP:n todistajanlausunnot olleet uskottavia. Mainitussa asiassa ei ... |
50 | Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Criminal proceedings against Emil Milev.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive (EU) 2016/343 — P... | Case C-310/18 PPU. | https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/SV/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62018CJ0310 | 2019 | digraph {
rankdir=LR;
node [shape=box];
"bulgarisk domstol" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"bulgarisk domstol" -> "beslutade att inte häkta Emil Milev";
"beslutade att inte häkta Emil Milev" -> "det första av dessa mål, som rör ett bankrån";
"beslutade att inte häkta Emil Milev" -> "Uppgiftern... | Swedish | Avseende det första av dessa mål, som rör ett bankrån, har den hänskjutande domstolen angett att en bulgarisk domstol beslutade att inte häkta Emil Milev med motiveringen att uppgifterna från huvudvittnet, BP, inte var tillförlitliga. Ännu har inget domstolsavgörande i sak meddelats i nämnda mål. |
51 | Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Criminal proceedings against Emil Milev.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive (EU) 2016/343 — P... | Case C-310/18 PPU. | https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62018CJ0310 | 2019 | digraph {
rankdir=LR;
node [shape=box];
"Bulgarian court" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"Bulgarian court" -> "Mr Milev was acquitted of all charges against him on the ground that the statements of Mr BP were not deemed credible.";
"Mr Milev was acquitted of all charges against him on the ground t... | English | In the second case, which concerns the control of a criminal organisation set up to commit robberies with violence, in the context of which Mr BP is again the main prosecution witness, the referring court states that Mr Milev was detained from 24 November 2013 to 9 January 2018, when he was acquitted of all charges aga... |
52 | Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Criminal proceedings against Emil Milev.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive (EU) 2016/343 — P... | Case C-310/18 PPU. | https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/BG/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62018CJ0310 | 2019 | digraph {
rankdir=LR;
node [shape=box];
"българският съд" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"българският съд" -> "г-н Милев е оправдан по всички обвинения, тъй като българският съд не приема показанията на г-н ВР за достоверни.";
"г-н Милев е оправдан по всички обвинения, тъй като българският съд не ... | Bulgarian | Във връзка с второто дело, което е за ръководене на организирана престъпна група за извършване на грабежи, по което основен свидетел на обвинението отново е г‑н ВР, тя отбелязва, че г‑н Милев е задържан под стража от 24 ноември 2013 г. до 9 януари 2018 г., когато е оправдан по всички обвинения, тъй като българският съд... |
53 | Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Criminal proceedings against Emil Milev.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive (EU) 2016/343 — P... | Case C-310/18 PPU. | https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/ES/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62018CJ0310 | 2019 | digraph {
rankdir=LR;
node [shape=box];
"tribunal" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"tribunal" -> "El Sr. Milev fue absuelto de todos los delitos que se le imputaban, al considerar el tribunal que el testimonio del Sr. BP no era creíble.";
"El Sr. Milev fue absuelto de todos los delitos que se le im... | Spanish | En el segundo proceso, relativo a la dirección de un grupo criminal organizado para cometer robos con violencia, en el que el principal testigo de cargo también es el Sr. BP, el órgano jurisdiccional remitente explica que el Sr. Milev estuvo privado de libertad entre el 24 de noviembre de 2013 y el 9 de enero de 2018, ... |
54 | Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Criminal proceedings against Emil Milev.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive (EU) 2016/343 — P... | Case C-310/18 PPU. | https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/CS/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62018CJ0310 | 2019 | digraph {
rankdir=LR;
node [shape=box];
"bulharský soud" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"bulharský soud" -> "E. Milev byl v plném rozsahu zproštěn obžaloby z důvodu, že bulharský soud nepovažoval výpověď BP za věrohodnou.";
"E. Milev byl v plném rozsahu zproštěn obžaloby z důvodu, že bulharský sou... | Czech | Pokud jde o druhé řízení, které se týká vedení organizované zločinecké skupiny vytvořené s cílem spáchat loupeže a v jehož rámci je hlavním svědkem opět BP, předkládající soud uvádí, že E. Milev byl ve vazbě od 24. listopadu 2013 do 9. ledna 2018, kdy byl v plném rozsahu zproštěn obžaloby z důvodu, že bulharský soud ne... |
55 | Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Criminal proceedings against Emil Milev.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive (EU) 2016/343 — P... | Case C-310/18 PPU. | https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/DA/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62018CJ0310 | 2019 | digraph {
rankdir=LR;
node [shape=box];
"den bulgarske ret" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"den bulgarske ret" -> "Emil Milev blev frifundet for alle anklager mod ham, fordi BP’s vidneudsagn ikke blev betragtet som troværdige.";
"Emil Milev blev frifundet for alle anklager mod ham, fordi BP’s vidn... | Danish | I den anden sag, som omhandler ledelsen af en organiseret og bevæbnet kriminel gruppe med henblik på at begå røverier, inden for rammerne af hvilken BP ligeledes er anklagemyndighedens hovedvidne, har den forelæggende ret forklaret, at Emil Milev var fængslet den 24. november 2013 til den 9. januar 2018, hvor han blev ... |
56 | Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Criminal proceedings against Emil Milev.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive (EU) 2016/343 — P... | Case C-310/18 PPU. | https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/DE/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62018CJ0310 | 2019 | digraph {
rankdir=LR;
node [shape=box];
"bulgarische Gericht" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"bulgarische Gericht" -> "Er sei an letzterem Tag in allen Anklagepunkten freigesprochen worden, weil das bulgarische Gericht die Aussage des Zeugen BP für nicht glaubhaft gehalten habe.";
"Er sei an letzt... | German | Im zweiten Verfahren, das die Anführung einer zur Begehung von Raubüberfällen gegründeten Bande betreffe und in dem ebenfalls Herr BP der Hauptbelastungszeuge sei, habe sich Herr Milev vom 24. November 2013 bis zum 9. Januar 2018 in Untersuchungshaft befunden. An letzterem Tag sei er in allen Anklagepunkten freigesproc... |
57 | Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Criminal proceedings against Emil Milev.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive (EU) 2016/343 — P... | Case C-310/18 PPU. | https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/ET/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62018CJ0310 | 2019 | digraph {
rankdir=LR;
node [shape=box];
"Bulgaaria kohus" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"Bulgaaria kohus" -> "E. Milevit mõisteti kõikides talle esitatud süüdistuse punktides õigeks, kuna Bulgaaria kohus leidis, et BP ütlused ei ole usaldusväärsed.";
"E. Milevit mõisteti kõikides talle esitatud s... | Estonian | Teise kriminaalasja kohta, mis puudutab röövimiste toimepanemise eesmärgil tegutseva kuritegeliku ühenduse juhtimist ning milles BP on samuti põhitunnistaja, märgib eelotsusetaotluse esitanud kohus, et E. Milevit peeti vahi all 24. novembrist 2013 kuni 9. jaanuarini 2018: kuupäevani, mil ta mõisteti kõikides talle esit... |
58 | Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Criminal proceedings against Emil Milev.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive (EU) 2016/343 — P... | Case C-310/18 PPU. | https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EL/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62018CJ0310 | 2019 | digraph {
rankdir=LR;
node [shape=box];
"βουλγαρικό δικαστήριο" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"βουλγαρικό δικαστήριο" -> "ο E. Milev απηλλάγη από όλες τις κατηγορίες εναντίον του για τον λόγο ότι οι δηλώσεις του BP δεν κρίθηκαν αξιόπιστες";
"ο E. Milev απηλλάγη από όλες τις κατηγορίες εναντίον το... | Greek | Στο πλαίσιο της δεύτερης διαδικασίας, η οποία αφορά τη διεύθυνση μιας εγκληματικής οργανώσεως με σκοπό τη διάπραξη ληστειών με χρήση βίας και στην οποία ο BP είναι, επίσης, ο βασικός μάρτυρας κατηγορίας, το αιτούν δικαστήριο εκθέτει ότι ο E. Milev τέθηκε υπό κράτηση από τις 24 Νοεμβρίου 2013 έως τις 9 Ιανουαρίου 2018, ... |
59 | Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Criminal proceedings against Emil Milev.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive (EU) 2016/343 — P... | Case C-310/18 PPU. | https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/FR/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62018CJ0310 | 2019 | digraph {
rankdir=LR;
node [shape=box];
"juridiction bulgare" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"juridiction bulgare" -> "M. Milev a été acquitté de toutes les charges retenues contre lui au motif que les dépositions de M. BP n’ont pas été considérées comme étant crédibles.";
"M. Milev a été acquitté... | French | Dans la deuxième affaire, qui concerne la direction d’un groupe criminel organisé afin de commettre des vols avec violence, dans le cadre de laquelle M. BP est également le principal témoin à charge, elle expose que M. Milev a été détenu du 24 novembre 2013 au 9 janvier 2018, date à laquelle il a été acquitté de toutes... |
60 | Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Criminal proceedings against Emil Milev.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive (EU) 2016/343 — P... | Case C-310/18 PPU. | https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/HR/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62018CJ0310 | 2019 | digraph {
rankdir=LR;
node [shape=box];
"bugarski sud" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"bugarski sud" -> "E. Milev je oslobođen svih optužbi zato što je bugarski sud smatrao BP‑ove iskaze nevjerodostojnima.";
"E. Milev je oslobođen svih optužbi zato što je bugarski sud smatrao BP‑ove iskaze nevjero... | Croatian | Sud koji je uputio zahtjev navodi da je u drugom predmetu, koji se odnosi na vođenje zločinačkog udruženja kojemu je cilj počinjenje razbojništvâ, u kojemu je BP također glavni svjedok optužbe, E. Milev bio u istražnom zatvoru od 24. studenoga 2013. do 9. siječnja 2018., datuma kada je oslobođen svih optužbi zato što j... |
61 | Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Criminal proceedings against Emil Milev.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive (EU) 2016/343 — P... | Case C-310/18 PPU. | https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/IT/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62018CJ0310 | 2019 | digraph {
rankdir=LR;
node [shape=box];
"giudice bulgaro" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"giudice bulgaro" -> "Il sig. Milev è stato assolto da tutti i capi d’accusa nei suoi confronti in quanto il giudice bulgaro non ha considerato credibile la deposizione del sig. BP.";
"Il sig. Milev è stato as... | Italian | Nell’ambito del secondo procedimento, concernente la direzione di un’associazione a delinquere con il fine di compiere rapine, in cui il sig. BP è parimenti il principale testimone a carico, il giudice del rinvio riferisce che il sig. Milev è stato trattenuto dal 24 novembre 2013 al 9 gennaio 2018, data in cui è stato ... |
62 | Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Criminal proceedings against Emil Milev.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive (EU) 2016/343 — P... | Case C-310/18 PPU. | https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/LV/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62018CJ0310 | 2019 | digraph {
rankdir=LR;
node [shape=box];
"Bulgārijas tiesa" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"Bulgārijas tiesa" -> "E. Milev tika attaisnots visās pret viņu celtajās apsūdzībās, pamatojoties uz to, ka Bulgārijas tiesa neuzskatīja BP liecības par ticamām.";
"E. Milev tika attaisnots visās pret viņu ce... | Latvian | Attiecībā uz otro lietu saistībā ar organizētas noziedzīgas grupas vadīšanu, lai veiktu laupīšanas, kurā BP arī ir galvenais apsūdzības liecinieks, tā paskaidro, ka E. Milev ir atradies apcietinājumā no 2013. gada 24. novembra līdz 2018. gada 9. janvārim, proti, datumam, kurā viņš tika attaisnots visās pret viņu celtaj... |
63 | Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Criminal proceedings against Emil Milev.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive (EU) 2016/343 — P... | Case C-310/18 PPU. | https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/LT/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62018CJ0310 | 2019 | digraph {
rankdir=LR;
node [shape=box];
"Bulgarijos teismas" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"Bulgarijos teismas" -> "E. Milev buvo išteisintas dėl visų jam pareikštų kaltinimų, nes Bulgarijos teismas nusprendė, kad liudytojo BP parodymai nepatikimi.";
"E. Milev buvo išteisintas dėl visų jam pareik... | Lithuanian | Dėl antros baudžiamosios bylos, kurioje pagrindinis liudytojas taip pat yra BP ir kuri susijusi su vadovavimu plėšimus vykdžiusiam nusikalstamam susivienijimui, šis teismas nurodo, kad E. Milev buvo suimtas nuo 2013 m. lapkričio 24 d. iki 2018 m. sausio 9 d., t. y. nuo momento, kai buvo išteisintas dėl visų jam pareikš... |
64 | Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Criminal proceedings against Emil Milev.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive (EU) 2016/343 — P... | Case C-310/18 PPU. | https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/HU/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62018CJ0310 | 2019 | digraph {
rankdir=LR;
node [shape=box];
"bolgár bíróság" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"bolgár bíróság" -> "E. Milevet valamennyi vádpont alól felmentették, mivel BP tanúvallomásait a bolgár bíróság nem tekintette hitelesnek.";
"E. Milevet valamennyi vádpont alól felmentették, mivel BP tanúvallom... | Hungarian | Ami a második – rablások elkövetése céljából létrehozott bűnszervezet irányítására vonatkozó – ügyet illeti, amelyben szintén BP az elsődleges terhelő tanú, a kérdést előterjesztő bíróság jelzi, hogy E. Milevet 2013. november 24‑től 2018. január 9‑ig fogva tartották, amikor is valamennyi vádpont alól felmentették, mive... |
65 | Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Criminal proceedings against Emil Milev.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive (EU) 2016/343 — P... | Case C-310/18 PPU. | https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/MT/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62018CJ0310 | 2019 | digraph {
rankdir=LR;
node [shape=box];
"qorti Bulgara" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"qorti Bulgara" -> "E. Milev ġie arrestat mill-24 ta’ Novembru 2013 sad-9 ta’ Jannar 2018, data li fiha huwa nħeles mill-akkużi kollha miġjuba kontrih minħabba li x-xhieda ta’ BP ma kinitx meqjusa bħala kredibbli mi... | Maltese | Fit-tieni kawża, li tikkonċerna t-tmexxija ta’ grupp kriminali organizzat sabiex jitwettaq is-serq bi vjolenza, li fil-kuntest tagħha BP huwa wkoll ix-xhud prinċipali, din tesponi li E. Milev ġie arrestat mill-24 ta’ Novembru 2013 sad-9 ta’ Jannar 2018, data li fiha huwa nħeles mill-akkużi kollha miġjuba kontrih minħab... |
66 | Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Criminal proceedings against Emil Milev.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive (EU) 2016/343 — P... | Case C-310/18 PPU. | https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/NL/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62018CJ0310 | 2019 | digraph {
rankdir=LR;
node [shape=box];
"Bulgaarse rechter" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"Bulgaarse rechter" -> "Milev was van alle aanklachten tegen hem vrijgesproken omdat de Bulgaarse rechter de verklaringen van BP niet geloofwaardig achtte.";
"Milev was van alle aanklachten tegen hem vrijges... | Dutch | In de tweede zaak, waarin het gaat over de leiding van een georganiseerde criminele groep voor het plegen van diefstallen met geweld en waarbij BP eveneens de belangrijkste getuige à charge is, zet de verwijzende rechter uiteen dat Milev was gedetineerd van 24 november 2013 tot 9 januari 2018, de dag waarop hij van all... |
67 | Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Criminal proceedings against Emil Milev.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive (EU) 2016/343 — P... | Case C-310/18 PPU. | https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/PL/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62018CJ0310 | 2019 | digraph {
rankdir=LR;
node [shape=box];
"sąd bułgarski" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"sąd bułgarski" -> "E. Milev został uniewinniony ze wszystkich stawianych mu zarzutów, ponieważ zeznania BP nie zostały przez sąd bułgarski uznane za wiarygodne.";
"E. Milev został uniewinniony ze wszystkich sta... | Polish | W drugiej sprawie, dotyczącej kierowania zorganizowaną grupą przestępczą w celu dokonywania rozbojów, w której BP jest również głównym świadkiem oskarżenia, sąd odsyłający wyjaśnia, że E. Milev był tymczasowo aresztowany w okresie od 24 listopada 2013 r. do 9 stycznia 2018 r., kiedy to został uniewinniony ze wszystkich... |
68 | Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Criminal proceedings against Emil Milev.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive (EU) 2016/343 — P... | Case C-310/18 PPU. | https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/PT/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62018CJ0310 | 2019 | digraph {
rankdir=LR;
node [shape=box];
"órgão jurisdicional búlgaro" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"órgão jurisdicional búlgaro" -> "E. Milev foi absolvido de todas as acusações contra ele deduzidas, pelo facto de as declarações de BP não terem sido consideradas credíveis.";
"E. Milev foi absolv... | Portuguese | No segundo processo, que se refere à direção de uma associação criminosa, constituída com o objetivo de cometer roubos, no âmbito da qual BP é também a principal testemunha de acusação, informa que E. Milev esteve preso de 24 de novembro de 2013 a 9 de janeiro de 2018, data em que foi absolvido de todas as acusações co... |
69 | Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Criminal proceedings against Emil Milev.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive (EU) 2016/343 — P... | Case C-310/18 PPU. | https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/RO/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62018CJ0310 | 2019 | digraph {
rankdir=LR;
node [shape=box];
"instanța bulgară" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"instanța bulgară" -> "Domnul Milev a fost achitat de toate învinuirile reținute împotriva sa pentru motivul că depozițiile domnului BP nu au fost considerate credibile.";
"Domnul Milev a fost achitat de toat... | Romanian | În cea de a doua cauză, care privește conducerea unui grup infracțional organizat în scopul săvârșirii unor tâlhării, în cadrul căreia domnul BP este de asemenea principalul martor al acuzării, aceasta arată că domnul Milev a fost deținut de la 24 noiembrie 2013 până la 9 ianuarie 2018, dată la care a fost achitat de t... |
70 | Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Criminal proceedings against Emil Milev.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive (EU) 2016/343 — P... | Case C-310/18 PPU. | https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/SK/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62018CJ0310 | 2019 | digraph {
rankdir=LR;
node [shape=box];
"bulharským súdom" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"bulharským súdom" -> "pán Milev bol oslobodený spod všetkých bodov obžaloby z dôvodu, že výpovede pána BP neboli bulharským súdom považované za dôveryhodné.";
"pán Milev bol oslobodený spod všetkých bodov ob... | Slovak | V druhom prípade, ktorý sa týka vedenia organizovanej zločineckej skupiny s cieľom páchať lúpeže, v rámci ktorého je pán BP tiež hlavným svedkom, vnútroštátny súd uvádza, že pán Milev bol vo väzbe od 24. novembra 2013 do 9. januára 2018, do dňa, kedy bol oslobodený spod všetkých bodov obžaloby z dôvodu, že výpovede pán... |
71 | Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Criminal proceedings against Emil Milev.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive (EU) 2016/343 — P... | Case C-310/18 PPU. | https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/SL/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62018CJ0310 | 2019 | digraph {
rankdir=LR;
node [shape=box];
"bolgarsko sodišče" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"bolgarsko sodišče" -> "E. Milev je bil oproščen vseh obtožb, ker bolgarsko sodišče izpovedb osebe BP ni štelo za verodostojne.";
"E. Milev je bil oproščen vseh obtožb, ker bolgarsko sodišče izpovedb osebe B... | Slovenian | V drugem postopku, ki se nanaša na vodenje hudodelske združbe, katere cilj je izvajanje ropov in v okviru katere je oseba BP prav tako obremenilna priča, predložitveno sodišče navaja, da je bil E. Milev pridržan od 24. novembra 2013 do 9. januarja 2018, ko je bil oproščen vseh obtožb, ker bolgarsko sodišče izpovedb ose... |
72 | Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Criminal proceedings against Emil Milev.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive (EU) 2016/343 — P... | Case C-310/18 PPU. | https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/FI/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62018CJ0310 | 2019 | digraph {
rankdir=LR;
node [shape=box];
"bulgarialainen tuomioistuin" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"bulgarialainen tuomioistuin" -> "Milev vapautettiin kaikista häntä vastaan nostetuista syytteistä sillä perusteella, ettei bulgarialainen tuomioistuin pitänyt BP:n todistajanlausuntoja uskottavina.";
... | Finnish | Ennakkoratkaisua pyytänyt tuomioistuin esittää, että toisessa asiassa, joka koskee järjestäytyneen rikollisryhmän johtamista ryöstöjen suorittamista varten ja jonka yhteydessä BP on myös Mileviä vastaan todistava päätodistaja, Milev on ollut vangittuna 24.11.2013–9.1.2018, jolloin hänet vapautettiin kaikista häntä vast... |
73 | Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Criminal proceedings against Emil Milev.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive (EU) 2016/343 — P... | Case C-310/18 PPU. | https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/SV/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62018CJ0310 | 2019 | digraph {
rankdir=LR;
node [shape=box];
"den bulgariska domstolen" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"den bulgariska domstolen" -> "Emil Milev friades från alla anklagelser på grund av att den bulgariska domstolen bedömde att BP:s uppgifter inte var tillförlitliga.";
"Emil Milev friades från alla ank... | Swedish | Angående det andra målet, som avser ledningen av en kriminell grupp som bildats i syfte att begå rån, i vilket BP också är huvudvittnet, har den hänskjutande domstolen angett att Emil Milev var frihetsberövad från den 24 november 2013 till den 9 januari 2018, då han friades från alla anklagelser på grund av att den bul... |
74 | Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 2 May 2019.
Lavorgna Srl v Comune di Montelanico and Others.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Public procurement — Directive 2014/24/EU — Labour costs — Automatic exclusion of tenderer... | Case C-309/18. | https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62018CJ0309 | 2019 | digraph {
rankdir=LR;
node [shape=box];
"The municipality of Montelanico" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"Article 4 of Directive 2014/24" [shape=trapezium];
"The municipality of Montelanico" -> "Notice 29/09/2017";
"Notice 29/09/2017" -> "Published an open tender procedure with a contract valu... | English | By a notice of 29 September 2017, the municipality of Montelanico published an open tender procedure with a contract value exceeding the threshold in Article 4 of Directive 2014/24. That notice did not expressly refer to the obligation on operators, under Article 95(10) of the Code of Public Contracts, to list labour c... |
75 | Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 2 May 2019.
Lavorgna Srl v Comune di Montelanico and Others.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Public procurement — Directive 2014/24/EU — Labour costs — Automatic exclusion of tenderer... | Case C-309/18. | https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/BG/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62018CJ0309 | 2019 | digraph {
rankdir=LR;
node [shape=box];
"община Монтеланико Montelanico" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"член 4 от Директива 2014/24" [shape=trapezium];
"община Монтеланико Montelanico" -> "обявление 29/09/2017";
"обявление 29/09/2017" -> "публикува обявление за открита процедура за възлагане ... | Bulgarian | На 29 септември 2017 г. община Монтеланико публикува обявление за открита процедура за възлагане на обществена поръчка на стойност над прага по член 4 от Директива 2014/24. В обявлението не се припомня изрично задължението на операторите за посочване в икономическите оферти на разходите за труд, предвидено в член 95, п... |
76 | Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 2 May 2019.
Lavorgna Srl v Comune di Montelanico and Others.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Public procurement — Directive 2014/24/EU — Labour costs — Automatic exclusion of tenderer... | Case C-309/18. | https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/ES/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62018CJ0309 | 2019 | digraph {
rankdir=LR;
node [shape=box];
"el Ayuntamiento de Montelanico Montelanico" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"artículo 4 de la Directiva 2014/24 2014/24" [shape=trapezium];
"el Ayuntamiento de Montelanico Montelanico" -> "anuncio de 29 de septiembre de 2017 29/09/2017";
"anuncio de 29 d... | Spanish | Mediante anuncio de 29 de septiembre de 2017, el Ayuntamiento de Montelanico inició un procedimiento de licitación abierto cuyo valor de mercado superaba el umbral establecido en el artículo 4 de la Directiva 2014/24. Dicho anuncio no recordaba expresamente la obligación que tienen los operadores de indicar en su ofert... |
77 | Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 2 May 2019.
Lavorgna Srl v Comune di Montelanico and Others.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Public procurement — Directive 2014/24/EU — Labour costs — Automatic exclusion of tenderer... | Case C-309/18. | https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/CS/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62018CJ0309 | 2019 | digraph {
rankdir=LR;
node [shape=box];
"Obec Montelanico Montelanico" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"článku 4 směrnice 2014/24" [shape=trapezium];
"Obec Montelanico Montelanico" -> "oznámením ze dne 29. září 2017 29/09/2017";
"oznámením ze dne 29. září 2017 29/09/2017" -> "Obec Montelanico o... | Czech | Obec Montelanico oznámením ze dne 29. září 2017 zahájila otevřené zadávací řízení, ve kterém hodnota zakázky překračovala prahovou hodnotu stanovenou v článku 4 směrnice 2014/24. Toto oznámení výslovně nepřipomínalo povinnost hospodářských subjektů uvést v jejich ekonomické nabídce náklady práce, stanovenou v čl. 95 od... |
78 | Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 2 May 2019.
Lavorgna Srl v Comune di Montelanico and Others.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Public procurement — Directive 2014/24/EU — Labour costs — Automatic exclusion of tenderer... | Case C-309/18. | https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/DA/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62018CJ0309 | 2019 | digraph {
rankdir=LR;
node [shape=box];
"Montelanico kommune Montelanico" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"artikel 4 i direktiv 2014/24 2014/24" [shape=trapezium];
"Montelanico kommune Montelanico" -> "bekendtgørelse 29/09/2017";
"bekendtgørelse 29/09/2017" -> "iværksatte Montelanico kommune et... | Danish | Ved bekendtgørelse af 29. september 2017 iværksatte Montelanico kommune et offentligt udbud, hvor værdien af kontrakten oversteg den tærskel, som er fastsat i artikel 4 i direktiv 2014/24. I bekendtgørelsen var aktørernes forpligtelse til i deres økonomiske bud at angive arbejdskraftomkostningerne, jf. artikel 95, stk.... |
79 | Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 2 May 2019.
Lavorgna Srl v Comune di Montelanico and Others.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Public procurement — Directive 2014/24/EU — Labour costs — Automatic exclusion of tenderer... | Case C-309/18. | https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/DE/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62018CJ0309 | 2019 | digraph {
rankdir=LR;
node [shape=box];
"Montelanico Montelanico" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"Art. 4 der Richtlinie 2014/24 2014/24" [shape=trapezium];
"Montelanico Montelanico" -> "Bekanntmachung 29/09/2017";
"Bekanntmachung 29/09/2017" -> "Mit Bekanntmachung vom 29. September 2017 leitet... | German | Mit Bekanntmachung vom 29. September 2017 leitete die Gemeinde Montelanico ein offenes Verfahren zur Vergabe eines Auftrags ein, dessen Volumen über den in Art. 4 der Richtlinie 2014/24 vorgesehenen Schwellenwert hinausging. In dieser Bekanntmachung wurde auf die in Art. 95 Abs. 10 des Vergabegesetzbuchs vorgesehene Pf... |
80 | Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 2 May 2019.
Lavorgna Srl v Comune di Montelanico and Others.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Public procurement — Directive 2014/24/EU — Labour costs — Automatic exclusion of tenderer... | Case C-309/18. | https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/ET/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62018CJ0309 | 2019 | digraph {
rankdir=LR;
node [shape=box];
"Montelanico omavalitsusüksus Montelanico" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"direktiivi 2014/24 artiklis 4 2014/24" [shape=trapezium];
"Montelanico omavalitsusüksus Montelanico" -> "hanketeatega 29/09/2017";
"hanketeatega 29/09/2017" -> "Algatas 29. septem... | Estonian | Montelanico omavalitsusüksus algatas 29. septembri 2017. aasta hanketeatega avatud riigihankemenetluse lepingu sõlmimiseks, mille maksumus ületas direktiivi 2014/24 artiklis 4 sätestatud piirmäära. Selles hanketeates ei olnud otsesõnu korratud ettevõtjale kohustust näidata hinnapakkumuses ära tööjõukulud, nagu on ette ... |
81 | Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 2 May 2019.
Lavorgna Srl v Comune di Montelanico and Others.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Public procurement — Directive 2014/24/EU — Labour costs — Automatic exclusion of tenderer... | Case C-309/18. | https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EL/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62018CJ0309 | 2019 | digraph {
rankdir=LR;
node [shape=box];
"Δήμος Montelanico Montelanico" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"άρθρο 4 της οδηγίας 2014/24" [shape=trapezium];
"Δήμος Montelanico Montelanico" -> "προκήρυξη 29/09/2017";
"προκήρυξη 29/09/2017" -> "Με προκήρυξη της 29ης Σεπτεμβρίου 2017, ο Δήμος Montelan... | Greek | Με προκήρυξη της 29ης Σεπτεμβρίου 2017, ο Δήμος Montelanico κίνησε διαδικασία ανοικτού διαγωνισμού του οποίου η αξία της συμβάσεως υπερέβαινε το προβλεπόμενο στο άρθρο 4 της οδηγίας 2014/24 κατώτατο όριο. Η εν λόγω προκήρυξη δεν υπενθύμιζε ρητώς την υποχρέωση των οικονομικών φορέων να αναγράφουν στην οικονομική προσφορ... |
82 | Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 2 May 2019.
Lavorgna Srl v Comune di Montelanico and Others.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Public procurement — Directive 2014/24/EU — Labour costs — Automatic exclusion of tenderer... | Case C-309/18. | https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/FR/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62018CJ0309 | 2019 | digraph {
rankdir=LR;
node [shape=box];
"la commune de Montelanico Montelanico" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"l’article 4 de la directive 2014/24 2014/24" [shape=trapezium];
"la commune de Montelanico Montelanico" -> "avis du 29 septembre 2017 29/09/2017";
"avis du 29 septembre 2017 29/09/20... | French | Par un avis du 29 septembre 2017, la commune de Montelanico a lancé une procédure ouverte d’appel d’offres dont la valeur du marché dépassait le seuil prévu à l’article 4 de la directive 2014/24. Cet avis ne rappelait pas expressément l’obligation faite aux opérateurs d’indiquer dans leur offre économique les coûts de ... |
83 | Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 2 May 2019.
Lavorgna Srl v Comune di Montelanico and Others.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Public procurement — Directive 2014/24/EU — Labour costs — Automatic exclusion of tenderer... | Case C-309/18. | https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/HR/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62018CJ0309 | 2019 | digraph {
rankdir=LR;
node [shape=box];
"Općina Montelanico Montelanico" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"člankom 4. Direktive 2014/24" [shape=trapezium];
"Općina Montelanico Montelanico" -> "obaviješću o nadmetanju od 29. rujna 2017. 29/09/2017";
"obaviješću o nadmetanju od 29. rujna 2017. 29/... | Croatian | Općina Montelanico obaviješću o nadmetanju od 29. rujna 2017. pokrenula je otvoreni postupak javne nabave čija je vrijednost ugovora prelazila prag propisan člankom 4. Direktive 2014/24. U obavijesti se nije izričito navodila obveza gospodarskih subjekata da u svojoj ekonomskoj ponudi navedu troškove radne snage, koja ... |
84 | Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 2 May 2019.
Lavorgna Srl v Comune di Montelanico and Others.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Public procurement — Directive 2014/24/EU — Labour costs — Automatic exclusion of tenderer... | Case C-309/18. | https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/IT/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62018CJ0309 | 2019 | digraph {
rankdir=LR;
node [shape=box];
"il Comune di Montelanico Montelanico" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"articolo 4 della direttiva 2014/24 2014/24" [shape=trapezium];
"il Comune di Montelanico Montelanico" -> "provvedimento del 29 settembre 2017 29/09/2017";
"provvedimento del 29 settem... | Italian | Con provvedimento del 29 settembre 2017, il Comune di Montelanico ha bandito una procedura d’appalto aperta il cui valore di mercato superava la soglia prevista all’articolo 4 della direttiva 2014/24. Il provvedimento in questione non richiamava espressamente l’obbligo incombente agli operatori di indicare nella loro o... |
85 | Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 2 May 2019.
Lavorgna Srl v Comune di Montelanico and Others.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Public procurement — Directive 2014/24/EU — Labour costs — Automatic exclusion of tenderer... | Case C-309/18. | https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/LV/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62018CJ0309 | 2019 | digraph {
rankdir=LR;
node [shape=box];
"Montelaniko pašvaldība Montelanico" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"Direktīvas 2014/24 4. pantā 2014/24" [shape=trapezium];
"Montelaniko pašvaldība Montelanico" -> "2017. gada 29. septembra paziņojumu 29/09/2017";
"2017. gada 29. septembra paziņojumu 29... | Latvian | Ar 2017. gada 29. septembra paziņojumu Montelaniko pašvaldība uzsāka atklātu iepirkuma procedūru, kuras iepirkuma vērtība pārsniedza Direktīvas 2014/24 4. pantā paredzēto robežvērtību. Šajā paziņojumā nebija tieši atgādināts Publisko līgumu kodeksa 95. panta 10. punktā paredzētais pienākums komersantiem saimnieciskajā ... |
86 | Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 2 May 2019.
Lavorgna Srl v Comune di Montelanico and Others.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Public procurement — Directive 2014/24/EU — Labour costs — Automatic exclusion of tenderer... | Case C-309/18. | https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/LT/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62018CJ0309 | 2019 | digraph {
rankdir=LR;
node [shape=box];
"Montelanico savivaldybė Montelanico" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"Direktyvos 2014/24 4 straipsnyje 2014/24" [shape=trapezium];
"Montelanico savivaldybė Montelanico" -> "skelbimu 29/09/2017";
"skelbimu 29/09/2017" -> "Skelbimu Montelanico savivaldybė ... | Lithuanian | 2017 m. rugsėjo 29 d. skelbimu Montelanico savivaldybė pradėjo atviro konkurso procedūrą; pirkimo vertė viršijo Direktyvos 2014/24 4 straipsnyje numatytą vertės ribą. Šiame skelbime aiškiai nebuvo priminta Viešųjų pirkimų kodekso 95 straipsnio 10 dalyje numatyta veiklos vykdytojų pareiga savo finansiniame pasiūlyme nur... |
87 | Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 2 May 2019.
Lavorgna Srl v Comune di Montelanico and Others.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Public procurement — Directive 2014/24/EU — Labour costs — Automatic exclusion of tenderer... | Case C-309/18. | https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/HU/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62018CJ0309 | 2019 | digraph {
rankdir=LR;
node [shape=box];
"Montelanico önkormányzata Montelanico" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"2014/24 irányelv 4. cikké 2014/24" [shape=trapezium];
"Montelanico önkormányzata Montelanico" -> "hirdetmény 29/09/2017";
"hirdetmény 29/09/2017" -> "Nyílt közbeszerzési eljárást ind... | Hungarian | A 2017. szeptember 29‑én közzétett hirdetményben Montelanico önkormányzata nyílt közbeszerzési eljárást indított, amely keretében a szerződés értéke meghaladta a 2014/24 irányelv 4. cikkében előírt értékhatárt. E hirdetmény nem hivatkozott kifejezetten a gazdasági szereplőknek a közbeszerzési kódex 95. cikkének (10) be... |
88 | Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 2 May 2019.
Lavorgna Srl v Comune di Montelanico and Others.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Public procurement — Directive 2014/24/EU — Labour costs — Automatic exclusion of tenderer... | Case C-309/18. | https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/MT/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62018CJ0309 | 2019 | digraph {
rankdir=LR;
node [shape=box];
"il-komun ta’ Montelanico Montelanico" [shape=doubleoctagon];
"Artikolu 4 tad-Direttiva 2014/24" [shape=trapezium];
"il-komun ta’ Montelanico Montelanico" -> "avviż 29/09/2017";
"avviż 29/09/2017" -> "Published an open tender procedure with a con... | Maltese | Permezz ta’ avviż tad-29 ta’ Settembru 2017, il-komun ta’ Montelanico fetaħ proċedura ta’ sejħa għal offerti li l-valur tal-kuntratt tagħha qabeż il-limitu minimu previst fl-Artikolu 4 tad-Direttiva 2014/24. Dan l-avviż ma fakkarx espressament l-obbligu impost fuq l-operaturi li fl-offerta ekonomika tagħhom jindikaw l-... |
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio
YAML Metadata Warning:empty or missing yaml metadata in repo card
Check out the documentation for more information.
LegalViz
LegalViz is a novel dataset of legal relationship visualization task based on legal texts taken from EUR-LEX that store EU official legal documents.
Paper
LegalViz: Legal Text Visualization by Text To Diagram Generation.
This paper has accepted at NAACL2025. Please visit paper from the link.
Dataset License
LegalViz dataset annotations are distributed under CC BY-SA 4.0. When you create any derivations, e.g., datasets, papers, etc, from JDocQA, please cite our paper accordingly. If your derivations are web-based projects, please cite our paper and include the link to this github page.
Download
Annotations can be downloaded from Github as well.
Annotation descriptions
Annotated files
dataset/legalviz_train.jsonl
dataset/legalviz_valid.jsonl
dataset/legalviz_test.jsonl
Annotation entries
"ID": Annotation unique ID.
"case_name": The name of the cases.
"case_number": Case ID numbers taken from EUR-LEX.
"document_url": Document URLs where the annotated texts taken from.
"year": The year cases have published.
"graphviz": DOT language Graphviz codes that visualize legal relationships.
"language": EU official languages that judgment cases written by.
"legal_text": Legal texts taken from EUR-LEX.
Citation
@inproceedings{onami-etal-2025-legalviz,
title = "{L}egal{V}iz: Legal Text Visualization by Text To Diagram Generation",
author = "Onami, Eri and
Miyanishi, Taiki and
Maeda, Koki and
Kurita, Shuhei",
editor = "Chiruzzo, Luis and
Ritter, Alan and
Wang, Lu",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 2025 Conference of the Nations of the Americas Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (Volume 1: Long Papers)",
month = apr,
year = "2025",
address = "Albuquerque, New Mexico",
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/2025.naacl-long.339/",
pages = "6657--6676",
ISBN = "979-8-89176-189-6"
}
- Downloads last month
- 22