Semantic Interruption Detection Benchmark
A multilingual benchmark for evaluating semantic interruption detection in conversational speech. The dataset contains annotated audio recordings in English and Mandarin Chinese, along with a silence/noise negative set, designed to test models that decide when (and whether) to interrupt a speaker.
Overview
In spoken dialogue systems and voice assistants, knowing when to interrupt a speaker — and detecting interruption signals in real time — is a critical yet under-studied task. This benchmark provides:
- 3,700 audio clips with frame-level interruption timestamps
- Bilingual coverage: English and Mandarin Chinese conversational speech
- Negative samples: 500 silence and environmental noise clips for robustness evaluation
- Three standardized metrics: FIR, IRL, and APT (defined below)
Dataset Statistics
| Split | Language | Total Samples | With Interruption | Without Interruption |
|---|---|---|---|---|
en_test_lines.jsonl |
English | 1,600 | 1,100 (68.8%) | 500 (31.3%) |
zh_test_lines.jsonl |
Chinese | 1,600 | 1,100 (68.8%) | 500 (31.3%) |
silence_noise_test.jsonl |
— | 500 | 0 (0%) | 500 (100%) |
| Total | 3,700 | 2,200 | 1,500 |
Audio duration:
- English: 0.36s – 22.0s (avg 3.74s)
- Chinese: similar range (avg 3.85s)
- Silence/noise: 0.09s – 182.0s (avg 13.0s)
Directory Structure
Semantic_Interaption/
├── README.md
├── test.ipynb # Evaluation notebook
└── test_wavs/
├── en_test_lines.jsonl # English ground-truth annotations
├── zh_test_lines.jsonl # Chinese ground-truth annotations
├── silence_noise_test.jsonl # Silence / noise annotations
├── en/ # English WAV files (1,600)
├── zh/ # Chinese WAV files (1,600)
└── silence_or_noise/ # Silence / noise WAV files (500)
Annotation Format
Each .jsonl file contains one JSON object per line.
Speech splits (en_test_lines.jsonl, zh_test_lines.jsonl)
{
"audio": "MDT_ASR_AI106_A0016_S0005_0_G3265_0318890-0324670.wav",
"total_nonbreak": false,
"duration": 5.78,
"break_time": 0.125,
"text_with_break": "<break> Experiencing different cultures, learning new languages, ..."
}
| Field | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
audio |
str |
Filename of the corresponding WAV file |
total_nonbreak |
bool |
true if no interruption occurs in the entire clip |
duration |
float |
Total audio duration in seconds |
break_time |
float |
Timestamp (seconds) of the first interruption signal; -1 when total_nonbreak=true |
text_with_break |
str |
Transcript with <break> token inserted at the interruption point |
Silence / noise split (silence_noise_test.jsonl)
All samples have total_nonbreak=true and text_with_break=null. These clips contain no speech and serve as a robustness / false-alarm test.
{
"audio": "wind_wind_heavy_clean_stdy_air.wav",
"total_nonbreak": true,
"duration": 152.52,
"break_time": 152.52,
"text_with_break": null
}
Evaluation Metrics
The benchmark defines three complementary metrics. Reference implementation is in test.ipynb.
FIR — False Interruption Rate
The fraction of non-interruption samples for which the model incorrectly predicts an interruption.
FIR = |false positives| / |total_nonbreak samples|
Lower is better.
IRL — Interruption Response Latency
Average absolute timing error (in seconds) over true-positive detections (model correctly identifies a break and the timestamp is within 50 ms of ground truth).
IRL = mean(|predicted_break_time - gt_break_time|) [over true positives]
Lower is better.
APT — Average Penalty Time
A unified penalty that captures both detection errors and timing inaccuracies:
| Prediction vs. Ground Truth | Penalty |
|---|---|
| Both predict no break | 0 |
| Predicted time within ±50 ms of ground truth | 0 |
| False alarm (predict break, no GT break) | Full clip duration |
| Missed detection (no prediction, GT has break) | duration − break_time |
| Late detection | predicted_time − break_time |
APT = mean(penalty) [over all samples]
Lower is better.
Download
The full dataset (audio + annotations) is hosted on Hugging Face:
https://huggingface.co/datasets/kxxia/SID-bench
# Option 1: huggingface_hub CLI
huggingface-cli download kxxia/SID-bench --repo-type dataset --local-dir ./SID-bench
# Option 2: Python
from huggingface_hub import snapshot_download
snapshot_download(repo_id="kxxia/SID-bench", repo_type="dataset", local_dir="./SID-bench")
Quick Start
import json
# Load ground-truth annotations
with open("test_wavs/en_test_lines.jsonl") as f:
en_samples = [json.loads(line) for line in f]
# Each sample
sample = en_samples[0]
print(sample["audio"]) # WAV filename
print(sample["total_nonbreak"]) # bool
print(sample["break_time"]) # float (seconds)
print(sample["text_with_break"]) # transcript with <break> marker
Run test.ipynb to reproduce the evaluation pipeline and compute FIR / IRL / APT against your own model predictions.
Prediction format
Your model should produce a JSONL file with one prediction per line:
{"audio": "MDT_ASR_AI106_A0016_S0005_0_G3265_0318890-0324670.wav", "total_nonbreak": false, "break_time": 0.13}
Use Cases
- Conversational AI / dialogue systems: training models to detect natural turn-taking signals
- Voice assistants: knowing when a user intends to interrupt or be interrupted
- Speech-to-speech translation: preserving interruption timing across languages
- Contact center analytics: segmenting overlapping speech
License
Please check the LICENSE file for usage terms. The audio data may originate from multiple source corpora; refer to their respective licenses before use in commercial applications.
Acknowledgement
The English conversational speech data used in this benchmark were derived from the English Duplex Conversation Training Dataset provided by MagicData.
MagicData. (2025). MDT-AF069 English Duplex Conversation Training Dataset. https://www.magicdatatech.com/datasets/asr/mdt-af069-multi-stream-spontaneous-conversation-training-datasets-english-1733294791
Citation
If you use this benchmark in your research, please cite:
@misc{semantic_interruption_benchmark,
title={Semantic-Aware Interruption Detection in Spoken Dialogue Systems: Benchmark, Metric, and Model},
author={Kangxiang Xia and Bingshen Mu and Xian Shi and Jin Xu and Lei Xie},
year={2026},
eprint={2603.24144},
archivePrefix={arXiv},
primaryClass={cs.SD},
url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.24144},
}