Dataset Preview
The full dataset viewer is not available (click to read why). Only showing a preview of the rows.
The dataset generation failed
Error code: DatasetGenerationError
Exception: ArrowInvalid
Message: JSON parse error: Column(/prompt) changed from string to number in row 92
Traceback: Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/src/services/worker/.venv/lib/python3.9/site-packages/datasets/packaged_modules/json/json.py", line 160, in _generate_tables
df = pandas_read_json(f)
File "/src/services/worker/.venv/lib/python3.9/site-packages/datasets/packaged_modules/json/json.py", line 38, in pandas_read_json
return pd.read_json(path_or_buf, **kwargs)
File "/src/services/worker/.venv/lib/python3.9/site-packages/pandas/io/json/_json.py", line 815, in read_json
return json_reader.read()
File "/src/services/worker/.venv/lib/python3.9/site-packages/pandas/io/json/_json.py", line 1025, in read
obj = self._get_object_parser(self.data)
File "/src/services/worker/.venv/lib/python3.9/site-packages/pandas/io/json/_json.py", line 1051, in _get_object_parser
obj = FrameParser(json, **kwargs).parse()
File "/src/services/worker/.venv/lib/python3.9/site-packages/pandas/io/json/_json.py", line 1187, in parse
self._parse()
File "/src/services/worker/.venv/lib/python3.9/site-packages/pandas/io/json/_json.py", line 1403, in _parse
ujson_loads(json, precise_float=self.precise_float), dtype=None
ValueError: Trailing data
During handling of the above exception, another exception occurred:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/src/services/worker/.venv/lib/python3.9/site-packages/datasets/builder.py", line 1855, in _prepare_split_single
for _, table in generator:
File "/src/services/worker/.venv/lib/python3.9/site-packages/datasets/packaged_modules/json/json.py", line 163, in _generate_tables
raise e
File "/src/services/worker/.venv/lib/python3.9/site-packages/datasets/packaged_modules/json/json.py", line 137, in _generate_tables
pa_table = paj.read_json(
File "pyarrow/_json.pyx", line 308, in pyarrow._json.read_json
File "pyarrow/error.pxi", line 154, in pyarrow.lib.pyarrow_internal_check_status
File "pyarrow/error.pxi", line 91, in pyarrow.lib.check_status
pyarrow.lib.ArrowInvalid: JSON parse error: Column(/prompt) changed from string to number in row 92
The above exception was the direct cause of the following exception:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/src/services/worker/src/worker/job_runners/config/parquet_and_info.py", line 1433, in compute_config_parquet_and_info_response
parquet_operations = convert_to_parquet(builder)
File "/src/services/worker/src/worker/job_runners/config/parquet_and_info.py", line 1050, in convert_to_parquet
builder.download_and_prepare(
File "/src/services/worker/.venv/lib/python3.9/site-packages/datasets/builder.py", line 925, in download_and_prepare
self._download_and_prepare(
File "/src/services/worker/.venv/lib/python3.9/site-packages/datasets/builder.py", line 1001, in _download_and_prepare
self._prepare_split(split_generator, **prepare_split_kwargs)
File "/src/services/worker/.venv/lib/python3.9/site-packages/datasets/builder.py", line 1742, in _prepare_split
for job_id, done, content in self._prepare_split_single(
File "/src/services/worker/.venv/lib/python3.9/site-packages/datasets/builder.py", line 1898, in _prepare_split_single
raise DatasetGenerationError("An error occurred while generating the dataset") from e
datasets.exceptions.DatasetGenerationError: An error occurred while generating the datasetNeed help to make the dataset viewer work? Make sure to review how to configure the dataset viewer, and open a discussion for direct support.
dataset_name string | subset_name string | source string | instruction_language string | prompt_language string | answer_language string | jurisdiction string | task_type string | downloaded_timestamp string | instruction string | prompt string | answer string |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BVADecisions | bva_decisions_label | https://github.com/LLTLab/VetClaims-JSON | nl | en | en | US | TEXT_CLASSIFICATION | 08-31-2023 | Identificeer de primaire functie van de zin in een juridisch argument en categoriseer het dienovereenkomstig. | Sentence: Citation Nr: 1400029 | Rhetorical Role: Sentence |
BVADecisions | bva_decisions_label | https://github.com/LLTLab/VetClaims-JSON | da | en | en | US | TEXT_CLASSIFICATION | 08-31-2023 | Kategoriser sætningen baseret på dens primære rolle i det juridiske argument ved at vælge mellem FindingSentence, ReasoningSentence, LegalRuleSentence, CitationSentence, EvidenceSentence eller Sentence, hvis ingen af de foregående kategorier gælder. | Sentence: FINDINGS OF FACT | Rhetorical Role: Sentence |
BVADecisions | bva_decisions_label | https://github.com/LLTLab/VetClaims-JSON | bg | en | en | US | TEXT_CLASSIFICATION | 08-31-2023 | Определете основната функция на изречението в рамките на правен аргумент и го категоризирайте като FindingSentence, ReasoningSentence, LegalRuleSentence, CitationSentence, EvidenceSentence или просто изречение, ако не отговаря на някоя от тези роли. | Sentence: 5. The Veteran's lay account of exposure to enemy mortar and gunfire attacks in Vietnam are credible and consistent with the places, types, and circumstances of the Veteran's service to include his military occupational specialty (MOS), unit, and assignment and duties, without clear and convincing evidence to... | Rhetorical Role: FindingSentence |
BVADecisions | bva_decisions_label | https://github.com/LLTLab/VetClaims-JSON | pt | en | en | US | TEXT_CLASSIFICATION | 08-31-2023 | Marque a sentença dada de acordo com a sua função principal em um argumento legal, selecionando entre as categorias de FindingSentence, ReasoningSentence, LegalRuleSentence, CitationSentence, EvidenceSentence ou Sentença se não se encaixar em qualquer um desses papéis. | Sentence: 6. The most probative evidence establishes that the Veteran does not have a current diagnosis of PTSD in accordance within the applicable VA regulation. | Rhetorical Role: FindingSentence |
BVADecisions | bva_decisions_label | https://github.com/LLTLab/VetClaims-JSON | et | en | en | US | TEXT_CLASSIFICATION | 08-31-2023 | Märgi lause vastavalt selle retoorilisele rollile juriidilises argumendis. | Sentence: REASONS AND BASES FOR FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS | Rhetorical Role: Sentence |
BVADecisions | bva_decisions_label | https://github.com/LLTLab/VetClaims-JSON | es | en | en | US | TEXT_CLASSIFICATION | 08-31-2023 | Por favor, etiquete lo siguiente según una de estas categorías.
La búsqueda. Una sentencia de hallazgo es una frase que afirma principalmente un hallazgo, conclusión o determinación autoritaria del juicio de hechos - una decisión tomada "como una cuestión de hechos" en lugar de "como una cuestión de ley".
de razonami... | Sentence: Analysis - Service Connection for PTSD | Rhetorical Role: Sentence |
BVADecisions | bva_decisions_label | https://github.com/LLTLab/VetClaims-JSON | en | en | en | US | TEXT_CLASSIFICATION | 08-31-2023 | Analyze the sentence's main role in a legal argument and classify it as either a FindingSentence, ReasoningSentence, LegalRuleSentence, CitationSentence, EvidenceSentence, or simply a Sentence if it doesn't belong to any specific category. | Sentence: In this case, the Veteran has contended that he has PTSD attributable to several combat and noncombat-related stressors in Vietnam. | Rhetorical Role: EvidenceSentence |
BVADecisions | bva_decisions_label | https://github.com/LLTLab/VetClaims-JSON | de | en | en | US | TEXT_CLASSIFICATION | 08-31-2023 | Klassifizieren Sie den gegebenen Satz nach seinem Hauptzweck im rechtlichen Argument, indem Sie aus Kategorien wie FindingSentence, ReasoningSentence, LegalRuleSentence, CitationSentence und EvidenceSentence auswählen oder einfach Satz auswählen, wenn er keine bestimmte Rolle passt. | Sentence: Specifically, he has asserted that he experienced enemy attacks with gunfire close to his base immediately upon arriving in Vietnam with subsequent, occasional mortar attacks on the base. | Rhetorical Role: EvidenceSentence |
BVADecisions | bva_decisions_label | https://github.com/LLTLab/VetClaims-JSON | pt | en | en | US | TEXT_CLASSIFICATION | 08-31-2023 | Categorize a sentença com base no seu papel primário no argumento legal, escolhendo entre FindingSentence, ReasoningSentence, LegalRuleSentence, CitationSentence, EvidenceSentence, ou Sentença se nenhuma das categorias anteriores se aplicar. | Sentence: He has also claimed that, while he was riding in transportation convoys to deliver supplies, his unit sustained enemy mortar, artillery, and gunfire attacks on several occasions. | Rhetorical Role: EvidenceSentence |
BVADecisions | bva_decisions_label | https://github.com/LLTLab/VetClaims-JSON | da | en | en | US | TEXT_CLASSIFICATION | 08-31-2023 | Bestem den primære funktion af sætningen inden for et juridisk argument og kategorisere det som en FindingSentence, ReasoningSentence, LegalRuleSentence, CitationSentence, EvidenceSentence, eller bare sætning, hvis det ikke passer nogen af disse roller. | Sentence: (It is noted however that the Veteran contradicted this story at the September 2011 VA examination when reporting that he was not shot at while travelling in a convoy). | Rhetorical Role: ReasoningSentence |
BVADecisions | bva_decisions_label | https://github.com/LLTLab/VetClaims-JSON | pl | en | en | US | TEXT_CLASSIFICATION | 08-31-2023 | Zidentyfikuj podstawową funkcję zdania w argumentacji prawnej i odpowiednio ją sklasyfikuj. | Sentence: He has further maintained that one of his "close friends" was killed by military security while entering the gates of his base in an apparent accident, but he has noted that he did not witness the event. | Rhetorical Role: EvidenceSentence |
BVADecisions | bva_decisions_label | https://github.com/LLTLab/VetClaims-JSON | pt | en | en | US | TEXT_CLASSIFICATION | 08-31-2023 | Marque a sentença dada de acordo com a sua função principal em um argumento legal, selecionando entre as categorias de FindingSentence, ReasoningSentence, LegalRuleSentence, CitationSentence, EvidenceSentence ou Sentença se não se encaixar em qualquer um desses papéis. | Sentence: He has not provided the name of the deceased soldier. | Rhetorical Role: EvidenceSentence |
BVADecisions | bva_decisions_label | https://github.com/LLTLab/VetClaims-JSON | sv | en | en | US | TEXT_CLASSIFICATION | 08-31-2023 | Kategorisera meningen baserat på dess primära roll i det juridiska argumentet genom att välja mellan FindingSentence, ReasoningSentence, LegalRuleSentence, CitationSentence, EvidenceSentence eller Sentence om ingen av de föregående kategorierna gäller. | Sentence: In addition, the Veteran has alleged that he had PTSD-related symptoms since service, especially anxiety. | Rhetorical Role: EvidenceSentence |
BVADecisions | bva_decisions_label | https://github.com/LLTLab/VetClaims-JSON | it | en | en | US | TEXT_CLASSIFICATION | 08-31-2023 | Etichettare la frase in base alla sua funzione principale in un argomento legale, selezionando tra le categorie di FindingSentence, ReasoningSentence, LegalRuleSentence, CitationSentence, EvidenceSentence, o sentenza se non si adatta a uno qualsiasi di questi ruoli. | Sentence: See July 2013 hearing testimony at pages 23-32; VA psychological examinations dated in December 1991, November 2010, and September 2011; September 2010 stressor statements. | Rhetorical Role: CitationSentence |
BVADecisions | bva_decisions_label | https://github.com/LLTLab/VetClaims-JSON | da | en | en | US | TEXT_CLASSIFICATION | 08-31-2023 | Vær venlig at mærke følgende efter en af disse kategorier.
at finde ud af. En fundet sætning er en sætning, der primært angiver en autoritativ konklusion, konklusion eller bestemmelse af dommen om fakta - en beslutning truffet "som et spørgsmål om fakta" i stedet for "som et spørgsmål om lov".
begrundelsen for. En be... | Sentence: Upon review of the evidence of record, the Board finds that the Veteran is not entitled to service connection for PTSD. | Rhetorical Role: FindingSentence |
BVADecisions | bva_decisions_label | https://github.com/LLTLab/VetClaims-JSON | lv | en | en | US | TEXT_CLASSIFICATION | 08-31-2023 | Lūdzu, marķējiet teikumu atbilstoši tā lomai kā FindingSentence, ReasoningSentence, LegalRuleSentence, CitationSentence vai EvidenceSentence. Ja tas nav neviens no šiem, atzīmējiet to kā tikai teikums. | Sentence: Initially, the Veteran's service personnel records and Report of Separation from the Armed Forces (DD Form 214) do not reflect receipt of medals, badges, or decorations that specifically denote combat with the enemy. | Rhetorical Role: EvidenceSentence |
BVADecisions | bva_decisions_label | https://github.com/LLTLab/VetClaims-JSON | ga | en | en | US | TEXT_CLASSIFICATION | 08-31-2023 | Brazzers físeán catagóir Inexperienced, Déagóirí, Seapáinis, Aziatochki, Téalainnis, Físeán HD ar a dtugtar Téalainnis Cailín Kim watch gan chlárú sa HD | Sentence: His service personnel records and DD Form 214 do document that he received medals and awards, such as the Vietnam Service Medal, Vietnam Campaign Medal, and the National Defense Service Medal among others, but there is no award that establishes that he engaged in combat. | Rhetorical Role: EvidenceSentence |
BVADecisions | bva_decisions_label | https://github.com/LLTLab/VetClaims-JSON | bg | en | en | US | TEXT_CLASSIFICATION | 08-31-2023 | Категоризирайте изречението въз основа на неговата основна роля в правния аргумент, като изберете FindingSentence, ReasoningSentence, LegalRuleSentence, CitationSentence, EvidenceSentence или Sentence, ако нито една от предишните категории не се прилага. | Sentence: Moreover, his military occupational specialty (MOS) was an armorer/unit supplier, which is not indicative of combat. | Rhetorical Role: EvidenceSentence |
BVADecisions | bva_decisions_label | https://github.com/LLTLab/VetClaims-JSON | bg | en | en | US | TEXT_CLASSIFICATION | 08-31-2023 | Анализирайте основната роля на изречението в правен аргумент и го класифицирайте като FindingSentence, ReasoningSentence, LegalRuleSentence, CitationSentence, EvidenceSentence или просто като изречение, ако не принадлежи към определена категория. | Sentence: He has also never stated that he actually engaged in combat with the enemy. | Rhetorical Role: EvidenceSentence |
BVADecisions | bva_decisions_label | https://github.com/LLTLab/VetClaims-JSON | da | en | en | US | TEXT_CLASSIFICATION | 08-31-2023 | Identificer den primære funktion af sætningen i et juridisk argument og kategorisere det i overensstemmelse hermed. | Sentence: Thus, the combat provisions are not for application. | Rhetorical Role: FindingSentence |
BVADecisions | bva_decisions_label | https://github.com/LLTLab/VetClaims-JSON | en | en | en | US | TEXT_CLASSIFICATION | 08-31-2023 | Classify the given sentence according to its main purpose in the legal argument, selecting from categories like FindingSentence, ReasoningSentence, LegalRuleSentence, CitationSentence, and EvidenceSentence, or simply Sentence if it doesn't fit any specific role. | Sentence: 38 C.F.R. § 3.304(f)(2). | Rhetorical Role: CitationSentence |
BVADecisions | bva_decisions_label | https://github.com/LLTLab/VetClaims-JSON | en | en | en | US | TEXT_CLASSIFICATION | 08-31-2023 | Label the given sentence according to its main function in a legal argument, selecting among the categories of FindingSentence, ReasoningSentence, LegalRuleSentence, CitationSentence, EvidenceSentence, or Sentence if it doesn't fit into any of those roles. | Sentence: See also 38 U.S.C.A. § 1154(b) and 38 C.F.R. § 3.304(d) (pertaining to combat Veterans). | Rhetorical Role: CitationSentence |
BVADecisions | bva_decisions_label | https://github.com/LLTLab/VetClaims-JSON | hu | en | en | US | TEXT_CLASSIFICATION | 08-31-2023 | Jelölje ki az adott mondatot a fő funkciója szerint egy jogi érvelésben, kiválasztva a FindingSentence, ReasoningSentence, LegalRuleSentence, CitationSentence, EvidenceSentence vagy Sentence kategóriák közül, ha nem illeszkedik ezekbe a szerepekbe. | Sentence: Nevertheless, under the July 13, 2010, liberalizing amendments to the PTSD regulation, the Veteran's lay testimony alone may establish the occurrence of claimed in-service stressors that are the result of "fear of hostile military or terrorist activity" in certain instances. | Rhetorical Role: LegalRuleSentence |
BVADecisions | bva_decisions_label | https://github.com/LLTLab/VetClaims-JSON | lv | en | en | US | TEXT_CLASSIFICATION | 08-31-2023 | Atzīmējiet teikumu, pamatojoties uz tā lomu juridiskajā argumentā, piemēram, FindingSentence, ReasoningSentence, LegalRuleSentence, CitationSentence vai EvidenceSentence. Ja tas neatbilst nevienai no šīm kategorijām, marķējiet to kā teikumu. | Sentence: 38 C.F.R. § 3.304(f)(3). | Rhetorical Role: CitationSentence |
BVADecisions | bva_decisions_label | https://github.com/LLTLab/VetClaims-JSON | bg | en | en | US | TEXT_CLASSIFICATION | 08-31-2023 | Определете основната функция на изречението в рамките на правен аргумент и го категоризирайте като FindingSentence, ReasoningSentence, LegalRuleSentence, CitationSentence, EvidenceSentence или просто изречение, ако не отговаря на някоя от тези роли. | Sentence: In this regard, the September 2011 VA psychological examiner indicated that the Veteran's alleged stressors of enemy mortar, artillery, and gunfire attacks while travelling in supply convoys and while assigned to his base are related to the "fear of hostile military or terrorist activity." | Rhetorical Role: EvidenceSentence |
BVADecisions | bva_decisions_label | https://github.com/LLTLab/VetClaims-JSON | lt | en | en | US | TEXT_CLASSIFICATION | 08-31-2023 | Nustatykite pagrindinę sakinio funkciją teisiniame argumente ir atitinkamai ją suskirstykite. | Sentence: In addition, the Board finds that the Veteran's descriptions of the claimed enemy attack stressors are consistent with the places, types, and circumstances of the Veteran's service in the U.S. Army in Vietnam at that time. | Rhetorical Role: ReasoningSentence |
BVADecisions | bva_decisions_label | https://github.com/LLTLab/VetClaims-JSON | en | en | en | US | TEXT_CLASSIFICATION | 08-31-2023 | Label the sentence according to its rhetorical role in a legal argument. | Sentence: 38 U.S.C.A. § 1154(a); 38 C.F.R. § 3.303(a). | Rhetorical Role: CitationSentence |
BVADecisions | bva_decisions_label | https://github.com/LLTLab/VetClaims-JSON | pt | en | en | US | TEXT_CLASSIFICATION | 08-31-2023 | Identificar a função primária da sentença num argumento jurídico e categorizá-la em conformidade. | Sentence: The Veteran's DD Form 214 and service personnel records confirm that he served in Vietnam from September 1970 to May 1971 with the 597th Transportation Company in the U.S. Army. | Rhetorical Role: EvidenceSentence |
BVADecisions | bva_decisions_label | https://github.com/LLTLab/VetClaims-JSON | nl | en | en | US | TEXT_CLASSIFICATION | 08-31-2023 | Bepaal de primaire functie van de zin binnen een juridisch argument en categoriseren als een FindingSentence, ReasoningSentence, LegalRuleSentence, CitationSentence, EvidenceSentence, of gewoon een zin als het niet past in een van deze rollen. | Sentence: His MOS as an armorer/unit supplier is also supportive of his assertions that he travelled in supply convoys in Vietnam on occasion, with the possibility of being subject to enemy attack on occasion. | Rhetorical Role: EvidenceSentence |
BVADecisions | bva_decisions_label | https://github.com/LLTLab/VetClaims-JSON | pl | en | en | US | TEXT_CLASSIFICATION | 08-31-2023 | Oznacz dane zdanie zgodnie z jego główną funkcją w argumentacji prawnej, wybierając spośród kategorii FindingSentence, ReasoningSentence, LegalRuleSentence, CitationSentence, EvidenceSentence lub Sentence, jeśli nie pasuje do któregokolwiek z tych ról. | Sentence: There is no clear and convincing evidence to the contrary that he was not involved in these incidents. | Rhetorical Role: ReasoningSentence |
BVADecisions | bva_decisions_label | https://github.com/LLTLab/VetClaims-JSON | it | en | en | US | TEXT_CLASSIFICATION | 08-31-2023 | Etichettare la frase in base alla sua funzione principale in un argomento legale, selezionando tra le categorie di FindingSentence, ReasoningSentence, LegalRuleSentence, CitationSentence, EvidenceSentence, o sentenza se non si adatta a uno qualsiasi di questi ruoli. | Sentence: Thus, under the amended PTSD regulation, the Veteran's lay testimony and statements alone establish the occurrence of the claimed in-service stressors of enemy mortar, artillery, and gunfire attacks while travelling in supply convoys and while assigned to his base. | Rhetorical Role: FindingSentence |
BVADecisions | bva_decisions_label | https://github.com/LLTLab/VetClaims-JSON | ga | en | en | US | TEXT_CLASSIFICATION | 08-31-2023 | Brazzers físeán catagóir Inexperienced, Déagóirí, Seapáinis, Aziatochki, Téalainnis, Físeán HD ar a dtugtar Téalainnis Cailín Kim watch gan chlárú sa HD | Sentence: See 38 C.F.R. § 3.304(f)(3). | Rhetorical Role: CitationSentence |
BVADecisions | bva_decisions_label | https://github.com/LLTLab/VetClaims-JSON | en | en | en | US | TEXT_CLASSIFICATION | 08-31-2023 | Determine the primary function of the sentence within a legal argument and categorize it as a FindingSentence, ReasoningSentence, LegalRuleSentence, CitationSentence, EvidenceSentence, or just Sentence if it doesn't fit any of these roles. | Sentence: The Veteran's service treatment records do not reveal complaints, treatment, or diagnosis of PTSD or any other acquired psychiatric disorder. | Rhetorical Role: EvidenceSentence |
BVADecisions | bva_decisions_label | https://github.com/LLTLab/VetClaims-JSON | hr | en | en | US | TEXT_CLASSIFICATION | 08-31-2023 | Dodijelite oznaku rečenice na temelju njezine uloge unutar pravnog argumenta, kao što su FindingSentence, ReasoningSentence, LegalRuleSentence, CitationSentence ili EvidenceSentence. Ako se ne uklapa u bilo koju od tih kategorija, označite ga kao stavak. | Sentence: However, as to PTSD, an in-service diagnosis is not required. | Rhetorical Role: LegalRuleSentence |
BVADecisions | bva_decisions_label | https://github.com/LLTLab/VetClaims-JSON | lv | en | en | US | TEXT_CLASSIFICATION | 08-31-2023 | Iezīmējiet teikumu saskaņā ar tā retorisko lomu juridiskajā argumentā. | Sentence: See 38 C.F.R. § 3.304(f). | Rhetorical Role: CitationSentence |
BVADecisions | bva_decisions_label | https://github.com/LLTLab/VetClaims-JSON | et | en | en | US | TEXT_CLASSIFICATION | 08-31-2023 | Palun märgistage lause vastavalt selle rollile kas FindingSentence, ReasoningSentence, LegalRuleSentence, CitationSentence või EvidenceSentence. Kui see ei ole ükski neist, märgi see lihtsalt lause. | Sentence: Post-service, the Veteran did report symptoms of nervousness and anxiety in August 1971, which was several months after his discharge from service. | Rhetorical Role: EvidenceSentence |
BVADecisions | bva_decisions_label | https://github.com/LLTLab/VetClaims-JSON | sk | en | en | US | TEXT_CLASSIFICATION | 08-31-2023 | Analyzujte hlavnú úlohu vety v právnom argumente a klasifikujte ju buď ako FindingSentence, ReasoningSentence, LegalRuleSentence, CitationSentence, EvidenceSentence, alebo jednoducho ako vetu, ak nepatrí do žiadnej konkrétnej kategórie. | Sentence: However, VA psychological testing was normal at that time and did not reveal any mental health disorder. | Rhetorical Role: EvidenceSentence |
BVADecisions | bva_decisions_label | https://github.com/LLTLab/VetClaims-JSON | sv | en | en | US | TEXT_CLASSIFICATION | 08-31-2023 | Vänligen märka följande enligt en av dessa kategorier.
att hitta. En hitta mening är en mening som i första hand anger en auktoritativ upptäckt, slutsats eller bestämning av prövningen av fakta - ett beslut som fattas "som en fråga om fakta" i stället för "som en fråga om lag".
och förnuft. En resonemang mening är en... | Sentence: With respect to the criteria of a current diagnosis of PTSD, the threshold consideration for any service connection claim is the existence of a current disability. | Rhetorical Role: LegalRuleSentence |
BVADecisions | bva_decisions_label | https://github.com/LLTLab/VetClaims-JSON | bg | en | en | US | TEXT_CLASSIFICATION | 08-31-2023 | Моля, маркирайте изречението според ролята му като FindingSentence, ReasoningSentence, LegalRuleSentence, CitationSentence или EvidenceSentence. Ако това не е нито едно от тях, маркирайте го като просто изречение. | Sentence: 38 U.S.C.A. § 1110; 38 C.F.R. § 3.303; Boyer v. West, 210 F.3d 1351, 1353 (Fed. Cir. 2000); Brammer v. Derwinski, 3 Vet. App. 223, 225 (1992). | Rhetorical Role: CitationSentence |
BVADecisions | bva_decisions_label | https://github.com/LLTLab/VetClaims-JSON | ro | en | en | US | TEXT_CLASSIFICATION | 08-31-2023 | Atribuiți o etichetă la propoziție pe baza rolului său în argumentul juridic, cum ar fi FindingSentence, ReasoningSentence, LegalRuleSentence, CitationSentence sau EvidenceSentence. Dacă nu se încadrează în niciuna dintre aceste categorii, etichetați-l ca o propoziție. | Sentence: In particular, aside from verification of an in-service stressor, current medical evidence diagnosing PTSD in accordance with 38 C.F.R. § 4.125(a) (i.e., DSM-IV) is required, as well as competent evidence of a nexus between current PTSD symptomatology and his verified in-service stressor. | Rhetorical Role: LegalRuleSentence |
BVADecisions | bva_decisions_label | https://github.com/LLTLab/VetClaims-JSON | sk | en | en | US | TEXT_CLASSIFICATION | 08-31-2023 | Určte primárnu funkciu vety v rámci právneho argumentu a kategorizujte ju ako FindingSentence, ReasoningSentence, LegalRuleSentence, CitationSentence, EvidenceSentence alebo len ako vetu, ak sa nezhoduje s niektorou z týchto rolí. | Sentence: 38 C.F.R. § 3.304(f). See also Cohen v. Brown, 10 Vet. App. 128 (1997). | Rhetorical Role: CitationSentence |
BVADecisions | bva_decisions_label | https://github.com/LLTLab/VetClaims-JSON | el | en | en | US | TEXT_CLASSIFICATION | 08-31-2023 | Σημειώστε τη φράση σύμφωνα με το ρητορικό της ρόλο σε ένα νομικό επιχείρημα. | Sentence: Under the amended PTSD regulation, effective July 13, 2010, a VA psychiatrist or psychologist, or a psychiatrist or psychologist with whom VA has contracted, must confirm that the claimed stressor is adequate to support a diagnosis of PTSD and that a Veteran's symptoms are related to the claimed stressor, in ... | Rhetorical Role: LegalRuleSentence |
BVADecisions | bva_decisions_label | https://github.com/LLTLab/VetClaims-JSON | pl | en | en | US | TEXT_CLASSIFICATION | 08-31-2023 | Kategoryzuj zdanie w oparciu o jego główną rolę w argumentacji prawnej, wybierając z FindingSentence, ReasoningSentence, LegalRuleSentence, CitationSentence, EvidenceSentence lub Sentence, jeśli żadna z poprzednich kategorii nie ma zastosowania. | Sentence: 38 C.F.R. § 3.304(f)(3) (2013). | Rhetorical Role: CitationSentence |
BVADecisions | bva_decisions_label | https://github.com/LLTLab/VetClaims-JSON | ga | en | en | US | TEXT_CLASSIFICATION | 08-31-2023 | Brazzers físeán catagóir Inexperienced, Déagóirí, Seapáinis, Aziatochki, Téalainnis, Físeán HD ar a dtugtar Téalainnis Cailín Kim watch gan chlárú sa HD | Sentence: With regard to a diagnosis of PTSD based on his in-service stressors from Vietnam, the record reflects several favorable and unfavorable medical opinions of record. | Rhetorical Role: ReasoningSentence |
BVADecisions | bva_decisions_label | https://github.com/LLTLab/VetClaims-JSON | fi | en | en | US | TEXT_CLASSIFICATION | 08-31-2023 | Analysoi lauseen tärkein rooli oikeudellisessa argumentissa ja luokittele se joko FindingSentence, ReasoningSentence, LegalRuleSentence, CitationSentence, EvidenceSentence tai yksinkertaisesti lause, jos se ei kuulu mihinkään tiettyyn luokkaan. | Sentence: However, upon review, in the present case, the Board finds the most probative medical evidence weighs against a finding that the Veteran has a PTSD diagnosis in accordance with 38 C.F.R. § 4.125(a) (i.e., DSM-IV). | Rhetorical Role: FindingSentence |
BVADecisions | bva_decisions_label | https://github.com/LLTLab/VetClaims-JSON | et | en | en | US | TEXT_CLASSIFICATION | 08-31-2023 | Palun märgistage lause vastavalt selle rollile kas FindingSentence, ReasoningSentence, LegalRuleSentence, CitationSentence või EvidenceSentence. Kui see ei ole ükski neist, märgi see lihtsalt lause. | Sentence: The Board must determine, as a question of fact, both the weight and credibility of the evidence. | Rhetorical Role: LegalRuleSentence |
BVADecisions | bva_decisions_label | https://github.com/LLTLab/VetClaims-JSON | de | en | en | US | TEXT_CLASSIFICATION | 08-31-2023 | Kennzeichnen Sie den Satz nach seiner Hauptfunktion in einem rechtlichen Argument und wählen Sie aus den Kategorien FindingSentence, ReasoningSentence, LegalRuleSentence, CitationSentence, EvidenceSentence oder Sentence aus, wenn er nicht in eine dieser Rollen passt. | Sentence: Equal weight is not accorded to each piece of evidence contained in a record; every item does not have the same probative value. | Rhetorical Role: LegalRuleSentence |
BVADecisions | bva_decisions_label | https://github.com/LLTLab/VetClaims-JSON | en | en | en | US | TEXT_CLASSIFICATION | 08-31-2023 | Classify the given sentence according to its main purpose in the legal argument, selecting from categories like FindingSentence, ReasoningSentence, LegalRuleSentence, CitationSentence, and EvidenceSentence, or simply Sentence if it doesn't fit any specific role. | Sentence: The Board must account for the evidence which it finds to be persuasive or unpersuasive, analyze the credibility and probative value of all material evidence submitted by and on behalf of a claimant, and provide the reasons for its rejection of any such evidence. | Rhetorical Role: LegalRuleSentence |
BVADecisions | bva_decisions_label | https://github.com/LLTLab/VetClaims-JSON | ro | en | en | US | TEXT_CLASSIFICATION | 08-31-2023 | Clasificați o anumită propoziție în funcție de scopul său principal în argumentul juridic, selectând din categorii cum ar fi FindingSentence, ReasoningSentence, LegalRuleSentence, CitationSentence și EvidenceSentence sau pur și simplu o propoziție dacă nu se potrivește vreunui rol specific. | Sentence: See Struck v. Brown, 9 Vet. App. 145, 152 (1996); Caluza v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 498, 506 (1995); Gabrielson v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 36, 40 (1994); Abernathy v. Principi, 3 Vet. App. 461, 465 (1992); Simon v. Derwinski, 2 Vet. App. 621, 622 (1992); Hatlestad v. Derwinski, 1 Vet. App. 164, 169 (1991). | Rhetorical Role: CitationSentence |
BVADecisions | bva_decisions_label | https://github.com/LLTLab/VetClaims-JSON | fi | en | en | US | TEXT_CLASSIFICATION | 08-31-2023 | Määritä lauseen ensisijainen tehtävä oikeudellisessa argumentissa ja luokittele se FindingSentence, ReasoningSentence, LegalRuleSentence, CitationSentence, EvidenceSentence tai vain lause, jos se ei sovi mihinkään näistä rooleista. | Sentence: In evaluating the probative value of competent medical evidence, the Court has stated, in pertinent part: | Rhetorical Role: Sentence |
BVADecisions | bva_decisions_label | https://github.com/LLTLab/VetClaims-JSON | da | en | en | US | TEXT_CLASSIFICATION | 08-31-2023 | Bestem den primære funktion af sætningen inden for et juridisk argument og kategorisere det som en FindingSentence, ReasoningSentence, LegalRuleSentence, CitationSentence, EvidenceSentence, eller bare sætning, hvis det ikke passer nogen af disse roller. | Sentence: The probative value of medical opinion evidence is based on the medical expert's personal examination of the patient, the physician's knowledge and skill in analyzing the data, and the medical conclusion that the physician reaches. | Rhetorical Role: LegalRuleSentence |
BVADecisions | bva_decisions_label | https://github.com/LLTLab/VetClaims-JSON | da | en | en | US | TEXT_CLASSIFICATION | 08-31-2023 | Identificer den primære funktion af sætningen i et juridisk argument og kategorisere det i overensstemmelse hermed. | Sentence: . . . As is true with any piece of evidence, the credibility and weight to be attached to these opinions [are] within the province of the adjudicators; . . . | Rhetorical Role: LegalRuleSentence |
BVADecisions | bva_decisions_label | https://github.com/LLTLab/VetClaims-JSON | fr | en | en | US | TEXT_CLASSIFICATION | 08-31-2023 | Analyser le rôle principal de la phrase dans un argument juridique et la classer comme une FindingSentence, ReasoningSentence, LegalRuleSentence, CitationSentence, EvidenceSentence, ou simplement une phrase si elle n'appartient à aucune catégorie spécifique. | Sentence: Guerrieri v. Brown, 4 Vet. App. 467, 470-71 (1993). | Rhetorical Role: CitationSentence |
BVADecisions | bva_decisions_label | https://github.com/LLTLab/VetClaims-JSON | da | en | en | US | TEXT_CLASSIFICATION | 08-31-2023 | Tildel et mærke til sætningen baseret på dens rolle i det juridiske argument, såsom FindingSentence, ReasoningSentence, LegalRuleSentence, CitationSentence eller EvidenceSentence. Hvis det ikke passer til nogen af disse kategorier, skal du mærke det som sætning. | Sentence: It is not error for the Board to favor the opinion of one competent medical expert over that of another when the Board gives an adequate statement of reasons or bases. | Rhetorical Role: LegalRuleSentence |
BVADecisions | bva_decisions_label | https://github.com/LLTLab/VetClaims-JSON | fr | en | en | US | TEXT_CLASSIFICATION | 08-31-2023 | Veuillez étiqueter la phrase en fonction de son rôle en tant que FindingSentence, ReasoningSentence, LegalRuleSentence, CitationSentence ou EvidenceSentence. Si ce n'est pas l'un d'entre eux, marquez-le comme une seule phrase. | Sentence: See Owens v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 429, 433 (1995). | Rhetorical Role: CitationSentence |
BVADecisions | bva_decisions_label | https://github.com/LLTLab/VetClaims-JSON | sl | en | en | US | TEXT_CLASSIFICATION | 08-31-2023 | Določite glavno funkcijo stavka v pravnem argumentu in ga razvrstite kot FindingSentence, ReasoningSentence, LegalRuleSentence, CitationSentence, EvidenceSentence ali samo stavek, če ne ustreza nobeni od teh vlog. | Sentence: With regard to the positive evidence, in 2010 and 2011, a private psychologist, Dr. A.G., PhD., diagnosed the Veteran with PTSD due to his Vietnam experiences. | Rhetorical Role: EvidenceSentence |
BVADecisions | bva_decisions_label | https://github.com/LLTLab/VetClaims-JSON | fi | en | en | US | TEXT_CLASSIFICATION | 08-31-2023 | Luokittele lause sen ensisijaisen roolin perusteella oikeudellisessa argumentissa valitsemalla FindingSentence, ReasoningSentence, LegalRuleSentence, CitationSentence, EvidenceSentence tai Sentence, jos mitään edellä mainituista luokista ei sovelleta. | Sentence: Dr. A.G. believed the Veteran met the DSM-IV criteria for PTSD. | Rhetorical Role: EvidenceSentence |
BVADecisions | bva_decisions_label | https://github.com/LLTLab/VetClaims-JSON | lv | en | en | US | TEXT_CLASSIFICATION | 08-31-2023 | Atzīmējiet teikumu, pamatojoties uz tā lomu juridiskajā argumentā, piemēram, FindingSentence, ReasoningSentence, LegalRuleSentence, CitationSentence vai EvidenceSentence. Ja tas neatbilst nevienai no šīm kategorijām, marķējiet to kā teikumu. | Sentence: She added that his particular post-service line of work as a firefighter makes it more likely for him to experience PTSD symptoms or exacerbation of earlier trauma. | Rhetorical Role: EvidenceSentence |
BVADecisions | bva_decisions_label | https://github.com/LLTLab/VetClaims-JSON | es | en | en | US | TEXT_CLASSIFICATION | 08-31-2023 | Analizar el papel principal de la frase en un argumento legal y clasificarla como una FindingSentence, ReasoningSentence, LegalRuleSentence, CitationSentence, EvidenceSentence, o simplemente una frase si no pertenece a ninguna categoría específica. | Sentence: She noted symptoms, such as hypervigilance, reduced sleeping, nightmares, and anxiety. | Rhetorical Role: EvidenceSentence |
BVADecisions | bva_decisions_label | https://github.com/LLTLab/VetClaims-JSON | sk | en | en | US | TEXT_CLASSIFICATION | 08-31-2023 | Určte primárnu funkciu vety v rámci právneho argumentu a kategorizujte ju ako FindingSentence, ReasoningSentence, LegalRuleSentence, CitationSentence, EvidenceSentence alebo len ako vetu, ak sa nezhoduje s niektorou z týchto rolí. | Sentence: She indicated that the Veteran was no longer able to work as a firefighter due to his PTSD symptoms. | Rhetorical Role: EvidenceSentence |
BVADecisions | bva_decisions_label | https://github.com/LLTLab/VetClaims-JSON | cs | en | en | US | TEXT_CLASSIFICATION | 08-31-2023 | Prosím označte větu podle své role buď jako FindingSentence, ReasoningSentence, LegalRuleSentence, CitationSentence nebo EvidenceSentence. Pokud to není žádná z těchto věcí, označte ji jako pouhou větu. | Sentence: The conclusion of Dr. A.G. provides some evidence in support of the PTSD claim. | Rhetorical Role: ReasoningSentence |
BVADecisions | bva_decisions_label | https://github.com/LLTLab/VetClaims-JSON | pt | en | en | US | TEXT_CLASSIFICATION | 08-31-2023 | Determine a função primária da sentença dentro de um argumento legal e categorize-a como FindingSentence, ReasoningSentence, LegalRuleSentence, CitationSentence, EvidenceSentence, ou apenas sentença se não se encaixar em qualquer um desses papéis. | Sentence: On the other hand, a December 1991 VA psychological examiner diagnosed with Veteran with generalized anxiety disorder, but would not confirm a diagnosis for PTSD. | Rhetorical Role: EvidenceSentence |
BVADecisions | bva_decisions_label | https://github.com/LLTLab/VetClaims-JSON | hr | en | en | US | TEXT_CLASSIFICATION | 08-31-2023 | Analizirajte glavnu ulogu rečenice u pravnom argumentu i klasificirajte je kao FindingSentence, ReasoningSentence, LegalRuleSentence, CitationSentence, EvidenceSentence ili jednostavno kao rečenicu ako ne pripada bilo kojoj određenoj kategoriji. | Sentence: However, in rendering this opinion, the VA examiner did not have access to the Veteran's claims folder or any of the treatment records immediately after discharge reflecting the Veteran's complaints of nervousness. | Rhetorical Role: EvidenceSentence |
BVADecisions | bva_decisions_label | https://github.com/LLTLab/VetClaims-JSON | it | en | en | US | TEXT_CLASSIFICATION | 08-31-2023 | Analizzare il ruolo principale della frase in un argomento legale e classificarlo come FindingSentence, ReasoningSentence, LegalRuleSentence, CitationSentence, EvidenceSentence, o semplicemente una frase se non appartiene a una categoria specifica. | Sentence: Thus, this VA opinion is entitled to limited probative value. | Rhetorical Role: ReasoningSentence |
BVADecisions | bva_decisions_label | https://github.com/LLTLab/VetClaims-JSON | de | en | en | US | TEXT_CLASSIFICATION | 08-31-2023 | Bitte markieren Sie den Satz entsprechend seiner Rolle als FindingSentence, ReasoningSentence, LegalRuleSentence, CitationSentence oder EvidenceSentence. Wenn es keine von diesen ist, markieren Sie es als nur Satz. | Sentence: A November 2010 VA psychological examiner also provided a very detailed discussion of the Veteran's history of psychiatric treatment since discharge from service in 1971. | Rhetorical Role: EvidenceSentence |
BVADecisions | bva_decisions_label | https://github.com/LLTLab/VetClaims-JSON | fr | en | en | US | TEXT_CLASSIFICATION | 08-31-2023 | Déterminer la fonction principale de la phrase dans un argument juridique et la catégoriser comme une FindingSentence, ReasoningSentence, LegalRuleSentence, CitationSentence, EvidenceSentence, ou simplement une phrase si elle ne correspond pas à l'un de ces rôles. | Sentence: The VA examiner discussed the Veteran's in-service stressors thoroughly; however, the VA examiner opined that the Veteran's symptoms did not meet the DSM-IV criteria for PTSD or any other mental disorder. | Rhetorical Role: EvidenceSentence |
BVADecisions | bva_decisions_label | https://github.com/LLTLab/VetClaims-JSON | da | en | en | US | TEXT_CLASSIFICATION | 08-31-2023 | Label sætningen i henhold til dens retoriske rolle i et juridisk argument. | Sentence: The VA examiner indicated that the overall level of stress exposure based on frequency and severity of incident exposure was "low." | Rhetorical Role: EvidenceSentence |
BVADecisions | bva_decisions_label | https://github.com/LLTLab/VetClaims-JSON | lt | en | en | US | TEXT_CLASSIFICATION | 08-31-2023 | Prašome pažymėti sakinį pagal jo vaidmenį kaip FindingSentence, ReasoningSentence, LegalRuleSentence, CitationSentence arba EvidenceSentence. Jei tai nėra nė vienas iš šių dalykų, pažymėkite jį kaip tik sakinį. | Sentence: The examiner added that the Veteran was "vague" as to whether he was horrified at the time of the stressors. | Rhetorical Role: EvidenceSentence |
BVADecisions | bva_decisions_label | https://github.com/LLTLab/VetClaims-JSON | et | en | en | US | TEXT_CLASSIFICATION | 08-31-2023 | Klassifitseerige antud lause vastavalt selle peamisele eesmärgile juriidilises argumendis, valides sellistest kategooriatest nagu FindingSentence, ReasoningSentence, LegalRuleSentence, CitationSentence ja EvidenceSentence või lihtsalt lause, kui see ei sobi mingile konkreetsele rollile. | Sentence: Notably, the examiner remarked that the Veteran did not meet the DSM-IV criteria for PTSD of reporting symptoms of re-experiencing, avoidance, and arousal. | Rhetorical Role: EvidenceSentence |
BVADecisions | bva_decisions_label | https://github.com/LLTLab/VetClaims-JSON | sl | en | en | US | TEXT_CLASSIFICATION | 08-31-2023 | Prosimo, označite naslednje po eni od teh kategorij.
Poišči se. Najdeni stavek je stavek, ki v prvi vrsti navaja avtoritativno ugotovitev, zaključek ali določitev presoje dejstev - odločitev, ki je bila sprejeta "kot stvar dejstev" namesto "kot stvar prava".
Razumevanje je. Razlagalni stavek je stavek, ki predvsem po... | Sentence: This examination provides strong evidence against the existence of a current PTSD diagnosis attributable to in-service stressors from Vietnam. | Rhetorical Role: ReasoningSentence |
BVADecisions | bva_decisions_label | https://github.com/LLTLab/VetClaims-JSON | nl | en | en | US | TEXT_CLASSIFICATION | 08-31-2023 | Label de zin volgens haar retorische rol in een juridisch argument. | Sentence: Additionally, a November 2010 VA mental health assessment from a nurse practitioner indicated that a diagnosis of PTSD had to be ruled out, but added that, based on his reported symptoms, he had a diagnosis of generalized anxiety disorder and dysthymia and did not meet the criteria for PTSD at that time. | Rhetorical Role: EvidenceSentence |
BVADecisions | bva_decisions_label | https://github.com/LLTLab/VetClaims-JSON | lv | en | en | US | TEXT_CLASSIFICATION | 08-31-2023 | Kategorizējiet teikumu, pamatojoties uz tā primāro lomu juridiskajā argumentā, izvēloties FindingSentence, ReasoningSentence, LegalRuleSentence, CitationSentence, EvidenceSentence vai Sentence, ja neviena no iepriekšējām kategorijām nav piemērojama. | Sentence: It was noted that the Veteran warranted further evaluation in the future due to his traumatic stressors as a firefighter and in Vietnam. | Rhetorical Role: EvidenceSentence |
BVADecisions | bva_decisions_label | https://github.com/LLTLab/VetClaims-JSON | sv | en | en | US | TEXT_CLASSIFICATION | 08-31-2023 | Bestäm den primära funktionen för meningen inom ett juridiskt argument och kategorisera den som en FindingSentence, ReasoningSentence, LegalRuleSentence, CitationSentence, EvidenceSentence, eller bara meningen om den inte passar någon av dessa roller. | Sentence: None of the other VA mental health records dated in 2010 diagnosed PTSD. | Rhetorical Role: EvidenceSentence |
BVADecisions | bva_decisions_label | https://github.com/LLTLab/VetClaims-JSON | sv | en | en | US | TEXT_CLASSIFICATION | 08-31-2023 | Märk meningen enligt dess retoriska roll i ett rättsligt argument. | Sentence: In fact, at a December 2010 VA mental health assessment, the Veteran "was unable to identify a specific stressor that may account for his 'nervousness' following time in Vietnam." | Rhetorical Role: EvidenceSentence |
BVADecisions | bva_decisions_label | https://github.com/LLTLab/VetClaims-JSON | fr | en | en | US | TEXT_CLASSIFICATION | 08-31-2023 | Veuillez étiqueter les éléments suivants selon l'une de ces catégories.
La découverte. Une phrase trouvée est une phrase qui affirme principalement une constatation, une conclusion ou une détermination autorisée du jugement des faits - une décision prise "comme une question de fait" plutôt que "comme une question de d... | Sentence: Moreover, a September 2011 VA psychological examiner found that the Veteran's symptoms did not meet the diagnostic criteria for PTSD under the DSM-IV or any other mental disorder. | Rhetorical Role: EvidenceSentence |
BVADecisions | bva_decisions_label | https://github.com/LLTLab/VetClaims-JSON | lt | en | en | US | TEXT_CLASSIFICATION | 08-31-2023 | Analizuokite sakinio pagrindinį vaidmenį teisiniame argumente ir klasifikuokite jį kaip FindingSentence, ReasoningSentence, LegalRuleSentence, CitationSentence, EvidenceSentence arba tiesiog sakinį, jei jis nepriklauso jokiai konkrečiai kategorijai. | Sentence: After discussing the Veteran's stressors, the VA examiner concluded that the Veteran's stressors were not sufficiently traumatic and were not adequate to support a diagnosis of PTSD for this particular Veteran. | Rhetorical Role: EvidenceSentence |
BVADecisions | bva_decisions_label | https://github.com/LLTLab/VetClaims-JSON | el | en | en | US | TEXT_CLASSIFICATION | 08-31-2023 | Σημειώστε τη συγκεκριμένη πρόταση σύμφωνα με την κύρια λειτουργία της σε ένα νομικό επιχείρημα, επιλέγοντας από τις κατηγορίες FindingSentence, ReasoningSentence, LegalRuleSentence, CitationSentence, EvidenceSentence ή Sentence εάν δεν ταιριάζει σε οποιονδήποτε από αυτούς τους ρόλους. | Sentence: Notably, the VA examiner indicated that the Veteran also answered in the negative regarding every single criterion for PTSD when specifically queried by the examiner about each and every symptom. | Rhetorical Role: EvidenceSentence |
BVADecisions | bva_decisions_label | https://github.com/LLTLab/VetClaims-JSON | pt | en | en | US | TEXT_CLASSIFICATION | 08-31-2023 | Etiquete a sentença de acordo com o seu papel retórico em um argumento jurídico. | Sentence: The examination revealed that he did not meet the DSM-IV criterion A through E for PTSD. | Rhetorical Role: EvidenceSentence |
BVADecisions | bva_decisions_label | https://github.com/LLTLab/VetClaims-JSON | cs | en | en | US | TEXT_CLASSIFICATION | 08-31-2023 | Analyzujte hlavní roli věty v právním argumentu a klasifikujte ji buď jako FindingSentence, ReasoningSentence, LegalRuleSentence, CitationSentence, EvidenceSentence, nebo jednoduše jako větu, pokud nepatří do žádné konkrétní kategorie. | Sentence: In particular, the Veteran did not persistently reexperience his traumatic events from Vietnam; there was no persistent avoidance of stimuli associated with the trauma or numbing of general responsiveness; there were no persistent symptoms of increased arousal; and the Veteran did not meet the full criteria f... | Rhetorical Role: EvidenceSentence |
BVADecisions | bva_decisions_label | https://github.com/LLTLab/VetClaims-JSON | cs | en | en | US | TEXT_CLASSIFICATION | 08-31-2023 | Prosím označte větu podle své role buď jako FindingSentence, ReasoningSentence, LegalRuleSentence, CitationSentence nebo EvidenceSentence. Pokud to není žádná z těchto věcí, označte ji jako pouhou větu. | Sentence: The Veteran also did not endorse a single symptom of clinical depression. | Rhetorical Role: EvidenceSentence |
BVADecisions | bva_decisions_label | https://github.com/LLTLab/VetClaims-JSON | nl | en | en | US | TEXT_CLASSIFICATION | 08-31-2023 | Selecteer de gegeven zin volgens de belangrijkste functie in een juridisch argument door te selecteren uit de categorieën FindingSentence, ReasoningSentence, LegalRuleSentence, CitationSentence, EvidenceSentence of Sentence als deze niet past in een van deze rollen. | Sentence: This examination also provides strong evidence against the existence of a current PTSD diagnosis attributable to in-service stressors from Vietnam. | Rhetorical Role: ReasoningSentence |
BVADecisions | bva_decisions_label | https://github.com/LLTLab/VetClaims-JSON | en | en | en | US | TEXT_CLASSIFICATION | 08-31-2023 | Categorize the sentence based on its primary role in the legal argument, choosing from FindingSentence, ReasoningSentence, LegalRuleSentence, CitationSentence, EvidenceSentence, or Sentence if none of the previous categories apply. | Sentence: Upon review, in the present case, the Board finds the most probative medical evidence weighs against a finding that the Veteran has a PTSD diagnosis in accordance with 38 C.F.R. § 4.125(a) (i.e., DSM-IV). | Rhetorical Role: FindingSentence |
BVADecisions | bva_decisions_label | https://github.com/LLTLab/VetClaims-JSON | ro | en | en | US | TEXT_CLASSIFICATION | 08-31-2023 | Analizați rolul principal al propoziției într-un argument juridic și clasificați-l ca FindingSentence, ReasoningSentence, LegalRuleSentence, CitationSentence, EvidenceSentence sau pur și simplu ca o propoziție dacă nu aparține unei categorii specifice. | Sentence: Overall, the November 2010 and September 2011 VA psychological examinations in particular were thorough, supported by an explanation, and considered the Veteran's history and relevant longitudinal complaints. | Rhetorical Role: ReasoningSentence |
BVADecisions | bva_decisions_label | https://github.com/LLTLab/VetClaims-JSON | et | en | en | US | TEXT_CLASSIFICATION | 08-31-2023 | Määrake lausele märgistus, mis põhineb selle rollil juriidilises argumendis, näiteks FindingSentence, ReasoningSentence, LegalRuleSentence, CitationSentence või EvidenceSentence. Kui see ei sobi ühtegi neist kategooriatest, märgi see lause. | Sentence: The VA opinions and treatment records outweigh the private treatment of record on the issue of whether the Veteran has a PTSD diagnosis in accordance with DSM-IV. | Rhetorical Role: ReasoningSentence |
BVADecisions | bva_decisions_label | https://github.com/LLTLab/VetClaims-JSON | da | en | en | US | TEXT_CLASSIFICATION | 08-31-2023 | Label sætningen i henhold til dens retoriske rolle i et juridisk argument. | Sentence: After an extensive interview and testing, the VA examiners provided greater detail in assessing whether the Veteran met each of the DSM-IV criteria (A through E) for PTSD than the private psychologist, Dr. A.G. | Rhetorical Role: ReasoningSentence |
BVADecisions | bva_decisions_label | https://github.com/LLTLab/VetClaims-JSON | sl | en | en | US | TEXT_CLASSIFICATION | 08-31-2023 | Kategorizirajte stavek glede na njegovo primarno vlogo v pravnem argumentu, tako da izberete FindingSentence, ReasoningSentence, LegalRuleSentence, CitationSentence, EvidenceSentence ali Sentence, če nobena od prejšnjih kategorij ne velja. | Sentence: With regard to lay evidence, the Board notes that lay persons are not categorically incompetent to speak on matters of medical diagnosis or etiology. | Rhetorical Role: LegalRuleSentence |
BVADecisions | bva_decisions_label | https://github.com/LLTLab/VetClaims-JSON | en | en | en | US | TEXT_CLASSIFICATION | 08-31-2023 | Label the given sentence according to its main function in a legal argument, selecting among the categories of FindingSentence, ReasoningSentence, LegalRuleSentence, CitationSentence, EvidenceSentence, or Sentence if it doesn't fit into any of those roles. | Sentence: Davidson v. Shinseki, 581 F.3d 1313, 1316 (Fed. Cir. 2009). | Rhetorical Role: CitationSentence |
BVADecisions | bva_decisions_label | https://github.com/LLTLab/VetClaims-JSON | sv | en | en | US | TEXT_CLASSIFICATION | 08-31-2023 | Vänligen märka meningen enligt dess roll som antingen en FindingSentence, en ReasoningSentence, en LegalRuleSentence, en CitationSentence eller en EvidenceSentence. Om det inte är någon av dessa, markera det som bara Satsning. | Sentence: The Board must consider the type of condition specifically claimed and whether it is readily amenable to lay diagnosis or probative comment on etiology. | Rhetorical Role: LegalRuleSentence |
BVADecisions | bva_decisions_label | https://github.com/LLTLab/VetClaims-JSON | da | en | en | US | TEXT_CLASSIFICATION | 08-31-2023 | Klassificer den pågældende sætning i henhold til dens hovedformål i det juridiske argument ved at vælge fra kategorier som FindingSentence, ReasoningSentence, LegalRuleSentence, CitationSentence og EvidenceSentence eller blot sætning, hvis den ikke passer til en bestemt rolle. | Sentence: See Woehlaert v. Nicholson, 21 Vet. App. 456, 462 (2007). | Rhetorical Role: CitationSentence |
BVADecisions | bva_decisions_label | https://github.com/LLTLab/VetClaims-JSON | fr | en | en | US | TEXT_CLASSIFICATION | 08-31-2023 | Analyser le rôle principal de la phrase dans un argument juridique et la classer comme une FindingSentence, ReasoningSentence, LegalRuleSentence, CitationSentence, EvidenceSentence, ou simplement une phrase si elle n'appartient à aucune catégorie spécifique. | Sentence: In this vein, the Board acknowledges the Veteran is competent to report psychiatric symptoms both during and after service. | Rhetorical Role: ReasoningSentence |
BVADecisions | bva_decisions_label | https://github.com/LLTLab/VetClaims-JSON | et | en | en | US | TEXT_CLASSIFICATION | 08-31-2023 | Palun märgistage lause vastavalt selle rollile kas FindingSentence, ReasoningSentence, LegalRuleSentence, CitationSentence või EvidenceSentence. Kui see ei ole ükski neist, märgi see lihtsalt lause. | Sentence: See 38 C.F.R. § 3.159(a)(2); Jandreau, 492 F.3d at 1377 (discussing that Veteran is competent to report a contemporaneous medical diagnosis); Buchanan v. Nicholson, 451 F.3d 1331, 1337 (Fed. Cir. 2006) (discussing general competency of a Veteran to report psychiatric symptoms). | Rhetorical Role: CitationSentence |
BVADecisions | bva_decisions_label | https://github.com/LLTLab/VetClaims-JSON | hr | en | en | US | TEXT_CLASSIFICATION | 08-31-2023 | Odredite primarnu funkciju rečenice unutar pravnog argumenta i kategorizirajte je kao FindingSentence, ReasoningSentence, LegalRuleSentence, CitationSentence, EvidenceSentence, ili samo rečenicu ako ne odgovara bilo kojoj od tih uloga. | Sentence: That notwithstanding, in the instant case, the Board has found the Veteran's lay statements are less persuasive than the post-service medical evidence finding that the Veteran does not meet the DSM-IV criteria for PTSD. | Rhetorical Role: ReasoningSentence |
BVADecisions | bva_decisions_label | https://github.com/LLTLab/VetClaims-JSON | nl | en | en | US | TEXT_CLASSIFICATION | 08-31-2023 | Gelieve het volgende te markeren volgens een van deze categorieën.
Op zoek naar. Een vinden zin is een zin die voornamelijk stelt een gezaghebbende bevinding, conclusie of bepaling van de trier van feiten - een beslissing genomen "als een kwestie van feiten" in plaats van "als een kwestie van wet."
Het redeneren. Een... | Sentence: The Federal Circuit has held that the Board can favor competent medical evidence over lay statements offered by the Veteran, as long as the Board neither deems lay evidence categorically incompetent nor improperly requires a medical opinion as the sole way to prove causation. | Rhetorical Role: LegalRuleSentence |
BVADecisions | bva_decisions_label | https://github.com/LLTLab/VetClaims-JSON | sl | en | en | US | TEXT_CLASSIFICATION | 08-31-2023 | Opredelite glavno funkcijo stavka v pravnem argumentu in ga ustrezno razvrstite. | Sentence: King v. Shinseki, 700 F.3d 1339, 1344 (2012). | Rhetorical Role: CitationSentence |
BVADecisions | bva_decisions_label | https://github.com/LLTLab/VetClaims-JSON | fr | en | en | US | TEXT_CLASSIFICATION | 08-31-2023 | Identifier la fonction principale de la phrase dans un argument juridique et la catégoriser en conséquence. | Sentence: Moreover, although the Veteran is competent to describe his psychiatric symptoms, by regulation, PTSD is a condition that can only be diagnosed by a medical professional, according to 38 C.F.R. § 3.304(f). | Rhetorical Role: LegalRuleSentence |
BVADecisions | bva_decisions_label | https://github.com/LLTLab/VetClaims-JSON | el | en | en | US | TEXT_CLASSIFICATION | 08-31-2023 | Παρακαλούμε επισημάνετε τη φράση σύμφωνα με το ρόλο της ως FindingSentence, ReasoningSentence, LegalRuleSentence, CitationSentence ή EvidenceSentence. Εάν δεν είναι κανένα από αυτά, σημειώστε το ως απλή πρόταση. | Sentence: Although the Veteran is entitled to the benefit of the doubt where the evidence is in approximate balance, the benefit of the doubt doctrine is inapplicable where, as here, the preponderance of the evidence is service connection for PTSD. | Rhetorical Role: FindingSentence |
BVADecisions | bva_decisions_label | https://github.com/LLTLab/VetClaims-JSON | fr | en | en | US | TEXT_CLASSIFICATION | 08-31-2023 | Assignez une étiquette à la phrase en fonction de son rôle dans l'argument juridique, tel que FindingSentence, ReasoningSentence, LegalRuleSentence, CitationSentence ou EvidenceSentence. Si elle ne correspond pas à l'une de ces catégories, étiquetez-la comme phrase. | Sentence: 38 U.S.C.A. § 5107; Gilbert v. Derwinski, 1 Vet. App. 49, 53 (1990). | Rhetorical Role: CitationSentence |
BVADecisions | bva_decisions_label | https://github.com/LLTLab/VetClaims-JSON | fr | en | en | US | TEXT_CLASSIFICATION | 08-31-2023 | Étiqueter la phrase en fonction de son rôle rhétorique dans un argument juridique. | Sentence: Citation Nr: 1456128 | Rhetorical Role: Sentence |
BVADecisions | bva_decisions_label | https://github.com/LLTLab/VetClaims-JSON | en | en | en | US | TEXT_CLASSIFICATION | 08-31-2023 | Identify the primary function of the sentence in a legal argument and categorize it accordingly. | Sentence: FINDINGS OF FACT | Rhetorical Role: Sentence |
BVADecisions | bva_decisions_label | https://github.com/LLTLab/VetClaims-JSON | pl | en | en | US | TEXT_CLASSIFICATION | 08-31-2023 | Proszę oznaczyć zdanie zgodnie z jego rolą jako FindingSentence, ReasoningSentence, LegalRuleSentence, CitationSentence lub EvidenceSentence. Jeśli nie jest to żaden z nich, zaznacz go jako tylko Wyrok. | Sentence: 1. | Rhetorical Role: Sentence |
End of preview.
No dataset card yet
- Downloads last month
- 20