| # Haystack proposals design process |
|
|
| Most of the changes to Haystack, including bug fixes and small improvements, |
| are implemented through the normal Pull Request workflow, according to our |
| [contribution guidelines](../CONTRIBUTING.md). |
|
|
| Some changes, though, are "substantial", and these are the ones we want to put through a bit |
| of a design process to make sure we're all on the same page before we invest the time |
| into the actual implementation of a new feature or a deep refactoring. |
|
|
| We've introduced the "Proposals design process" to provide a |
| consistent and controlled path for such changes to Haystack. |
|
|
| We will apply the same level of rigor to both core developers' and |
| Community's proposals. The primary difference between them is in the design phase: |
| core developers proposals tend to be submitted at the end of the design process |
| whereas the Community ones tend to be submitted at the beginning, as a way |
| to kickstart it. |
|
|
| ## When do I follow the process? |
|
|
| Follow the process if you intend to make "substantial" changes to Haystack, `rest_api` or the process itself. What is |
| defined as a "substantial" change is evolving based on community norms and on what part of the project you are proposing |
| to change, but it may include the following: |
|
|
| - A new feature that creates new API surface areas. |
| - A new component (Nodes, Pipelines, Document Stores). |
| - Removing features that already shipped in the current minor version. |
| - A deep refactoring that would require new tests or introduce new dependencies. |
| - A change that's complex enough to require multiple steps to be delivered. |
|
|
| Some changes don't require a proposal, for example: |
|
|
| - Minor bug fixes. |
| - Rephrasing, reorganizing, or otherwise "changing shape does not change meaning". |
| - Addition and removal of warnings or other error messages. |
| - Additions only likely to be noticed by other contributors, invisible to Haystack users. |
|
|
| In any case, the core developers might politely ask you to submit a proposal before merging |
| a new feature when they see fit. |
|
|
| ## Before creating a proposal |
|
|
| Laying some groundwork ahead of the proposal can make the process smoother. |
|
|
| Although there is no single way to prepare for submitting a proposal, it is generally a good idea |
| to collect feedback from other project developers first, to make sure that the change is |
| is actually needed. As we're an open source community where everyone can impact the project, we all |
| need to make an effort to build consensus. |
|
|
| When you're preparing for writing and submitting a proposal, talk the idea over on our official |
| [Discord server](https://haystack.deepset.ai/community/join) and in a Github |
| issue or discussion in the [Haystack repository](https://github.com/deepset-ai/haystack). |
|
|
| ## The process |
|
|
| To get a major feature added to Haystack, you first merge the proposal into the Haystack repo as a Markdown file. |
| At that point, the proposal can be implemented and eventually included into the codebase. |
|
|
| There are several people involved in the process: |
| - **Decision Driver**: the person creating the proposal. If the Decision Driver is not a core contributor themselves, |
| one will be assigned to the PR and will take care of facilitating the process. |
| - **Input Givers**: anybody reviewing or commenting the PR. |
| - **Approvers**: the core contributors approving the PR. |
|
|
| During its lifecycle, a proposal can transition between the following states: |
| - **Review**: proposal is getting feedback. |
| - **Final Comment**: proposal received approval from 3 core contributors; this state must be kept for a grace period of |
| 3 calendar days. |
| - **Active**: proposal was approved and merged and can be implemented if not already. |
| - **Stale**: proposal didn't get any update in the last 30 days and will be closed after a grace period of 10 days. |
| - **Rejected**: proposal was actively rejected and the reasons explained. |
|
|
|
|
| To create a proposal: |
|
|
| 1. Copy `0000-template.md` to `text/0000-my-feature.md`, where 'my-feature' is a descriptive name of the feature you're |
| proposing. Don't assign an identification number yet. |
| 2. Fill in the proposal. Pay attention to details. Proposals that present convincing motivation, |
| demonstrate an understanding of the feature impact, and honestly present the drawbacks and |
| alternatives tend to be received well. |
| 3. Submit a pull request. This ensures the document receives design feedback from a larger community, |
| and as the Decision Driver, you should be prepared to revise it in response. |
| 4. Rename the file using the PR number, for example from `text/0000-my-feature.md` to `text/4242-my-feature.md`. The |
| proposal is now in **Review** state. |
| 5. Reach an agreement with the Input Givers and integrate the feedback you got. Proposals that have broad support are |
| much more likely to make progress than those that don't receive any comments. |
| 6. Now it's time for the Approvers to decide whether the proposal is a candidate for inclusion in Haystack. Note that a |
| review from the core contributors may take a long time, and getting early feedback from members of the Community can |
| ease the process. |
| 7. When the proposal enters the **Final Comment** state (see above), the PR will be marked accordingly, entering a |
| grace period lasting 3 calendar days during which a proposal can be modified based on feedback from core developers |
| or the Community. Big changes may trigger a new final comment period. |
| 8. Approvers may reject a proposal once the public discussion and adding comments are over, adding the reason for |
| rejection. A core developer then closes the related PR. The proposal gets the **Rejected** state. |
| 9. When the final comment period ends, the PR is merged and the proposal becomes **Active**. |
|
|
| ## What happens next |
|
|
| Once a proposal becomes active, the authors are free to implement it and submit the feature as one or more pull |
| requests to the Haystack repo. Becoming 'active' is not a rubber stamp, and in particular still doesn't |
| mean the feature will ultimately be merged; it does mean that the core team has agreed to it in |
| principle and is open to merging it if the implementation reflects the contents of the proposal. |
|
|
| The fact that a given proposal has been accepted and is 'active' doesn't imply it has a priority assigned or somebody's |
| currently working on it. |
|
|
| To change an active proposal, open follow-up PRs. Our goal is to write each proposal so that |
| it reflects the final design of the feature, but the nature of the process means that we cannot |
| expect every merged proposal to actually reflect what the end result will be at the time of the next release. |
| That's why we try to keep each proposal document somewhat in sync with the feature as planned, tracking such |
| changes through follow-up pull requests to the document. |
|
|
| As the author of a proposal, you're not obligated to implement it. Of course, the author (like any other developer) |
| is welcome to post an implementation for review after the proposal has been accepted. |
|
|
| ## Inspiration |
|
|
| Haystack's proposals design process process owes its inspiration to the [React](https://github.com/reactjs/rfcs) and |
| [Rust](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs) RFC processes. We're open to changing it if needed. |
|
|