Datasets:

glnmario
/

ECHR

partition stringclasses 3 values	itemid stringlengths 8 10	languageisocode stringclasses 1 value	respondent stringlengths 3 135	branch stringclasses 4 values	date int64 1.96k 2.02k	docname stringlengths 11 228	importance int64 1 4	conclusion stringlengths 12 5.89k	judges stringlengths 8 416 ⌀	text stringlengths 64 316k	binary_judgement int64 0 1
dev	001-4817	ENG	ITA	ADMISSIBILITY	1,999	ERIKSON v. ITALY	3	Inadmissible	Elisabeth Palm	The applicant is a British national, born in 1945 and living in Rome. The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. The applicant's mother, born in 1906, used to live in Antella, near Florence, assisted on a daily basis at her domicile by R.O. On an unspecified date near the end of S...	0
dev	001-89307	ENG	LTU	CHAMBER	2,008	CASE OF BALSYTĖ-LIDEIKIENĖ v. LITHUANIA	3	Violation of Art. 6-1;No violation of Art. 10;Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed;Non-pecuniary damage - award	Alvina Gyulumyan;Corneliu Bîrsan;Egbert Myjer;Elisabet Fura;Ineta Ziemele;John Hedigan;Josep Casadevall	7. The applicant, Mrs Danutė Balsytė-Lideikienė, is a Lithuanian national, who was born in 1947. At present she lives in Lithuania. 8. The applicant is the founder and owner of a publishing company “Metskaitliai”. Since 1995 the company has published “Lithuanian calendar” (Lietuvio kalendorius), a yearly calendar with ...	1
dev	001-80213	ENG	FIN	CHAMBER	2,007	CASE OF W v. FINLAND	3	Violation of Art. 6-1+6-3-d;Non-pecuniary damage - financial award;Costs and expenses partial award - domestic proceedings;Costs and expenses award - Convention proceedings	Nicolas Bratza	6. On 7 August 2000 a mother contacted the police on account of a suspicion that her children, a girl born in 1991 and a boy born in 1993, had been sexually abused by a neighbour, the applicant. On 10 August and 2 September 2000 the siblings were interviewed by a police officer experienced in investigating sexual abuse...	1
dev	001-61958	ENG	DEU	CHAMBER	2,004	CASE OF CEVIZOVIC v. GERMANY	3	Preliminary objection rejected (estoppel);Violation of Art. 5-3;Violation of Art. 6-1;Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed;Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient;Costs and expenses (domestic proceedings) - claim dismissed;Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings	Ireneu Cabral Barreto	9. The applicant, Zvonko Čevizović, is a Croatian national born in 1966. When lodging his application, he was detained in Oldenburg, Germany. He is presently living in Rogaška Slatina, Slovenia. 10. On 17 June 1996 the applicant was arrested in Wilhelmshaven. On 18 June 1996 the Wilhelmshaven District Court issued a wa...	1
dev	001-113111	ENG	AUT	ADMISSIBILITY	2,012	SAHIN v. AUSTRIA	4	Inadmissible	Elisabeth Steiner;Erik Møse;Julia Laffranque;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska;Peer Lorenzen	1. The applicant, Ms Zybeyde Sahin, is an Austrian national who was born in 1974 and lives in Innsbruck. She is represented before the Court by Mr L. Szabo, a lawyer practising in Innsbruck. The Austrian Government (“the Government”) are represented by their Agent, Ambassador H. Tichy, Head of the International Law Dep...	0
dev	001-88790	ENG	RUS	CHAMBER	2,008	CASE OF ITSLAYEV v. RUSSIA	3	Remainder inadmissible;No violation of Art. 6-1	Anatoly Kovler;Christos Rozakis;Elisabeth Steiner;George Nicolaou;Giorgio Malinverni;Khanlar Hajiyev	5. The applicant was born in 1959. Formerly a resident of the village of Goyskoye of the Urus-Martan District in the Chechen Republic, he is currently living in the town of Nazran in Ingushetiya. He is a lawyer at the Memorial Human Rights Centre. 6. In April 1996 the applicant was appointed head of the administration ...	0
dev	001-4832	ENG	NLD	ADMISSIBILITY	1,999	BAKKER v. THE NETHERLANDS	4	Inadmissible	Elisabeth Palm	The applicant is a Dutch national, born in 1948, and resident in Enkhuizen. He is represented before the Court by Ms Y.E.J. Geradts, a lawyer practising in Amsterdam. a. Particular circumstances of the present case The applicant had, until mid 1991, a shop in Amsterdam where he sold telecommunication equipment. In 1989...	0
dev	001-105318	ENG	EST	ADMISSIBILITY	2,011	METSAVEER v. ESTONIA	4	Inadmissible	Elisabeth Steiner;George Nicolaou;Julia Laffranque;Khanlar Hajiyev;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska	The applicant, Mr Ülari Metsaveer, is an Estonian national who was born in 1973 and lives in Vantaa, Finland. He was represented before the Court by Ms B. Mõttus, a lawyer practising in Tallinn. The Estonian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ms M. Kuurberg, of the Ministry of Foreign Affair...	0
dev	001-85467	ENG	TUR	CHAMBER	2,008	CASE OF GÜMÜŞOĞLU v. TURKEY	4	Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property	Antonella Mularoni;Françoise Tulkens;Ireneu Cabral Barreto;Nona Tsotsoria	4. The applicants were born in 1955, 1935 and 1950 respectively and live in Hatay. 5. On various dates, the applicants bought plots of land (nos. 1233, 1230 and 1162 respectively) near the coast in Hatay. They each built a house there. 6. In 1995 the Treasury filed an action before the Samandağ Court of First Instance,...	1
dev	001-104907	ENG	DEU	CHAMBER	2,011	CASE OF MORK v. GERMANY	3	Remainder inadmissible;No violation of Art. 5-1	Angelika Nußberger;Dean Spielmann;Elisabet Fura;Ganna Yudkivska;Isabelle Berro-Lefèvre	5. The applicant was born in 1955 and is currently detained in Aachen Prison. 6. Between 1978 and 1981 the applicant was convicted, among other offences, of numerous counts of joint burglary committed in companies and shops and was imprisoned from March 1980 until February 1985. 7. In 1986 the Dortmund Regional Court c...	0
dev	001-61059	ENG	UKR	CHAMBER	2,003	CASE OF POLTORATSKIY v. UKRAINE	1	No violation of Art. 3 with regard to alleged ill-treatment;Violation of Art. 3 with regard to lack of effective investigation;Violation of Art. 3 with regard to conditions of detention;Violation of Art. 8;Violation of Art. 9;Non-pecuniary damage - financial award;Costs and expenses partial award	Nicolas Bratza	9. On 12 December 1995 the Ivano-Frankivsk Regional Court (oблacний суд) convicted the applicant of the murder of four persons, sentenced him to death and ordered the confiscation of his personal property. 10. On 22 February 1996 the Supreme Court (Верхoвний суд) upheld the judgment of the first-instance court. The app...	1
dev	001-97655	ENG	TUR	ADMISSIBILITY	2,010	TASDEMIR v. TURKEY	4	Inadmissible	Françoise Tulkens;Ireneu Cabral Barreto;Nona Tsotsoria;Vladimiro Zagrebelsky	The applicant, Mr Resul Taşdemir, is a Turkish national who was born in 1979. He was serving a sentence in the Erzurum Prison when the application was lodged. On 6 September 2005, to celebrate World Peace day, the applicant participated in a demonstration in the district of Doğubeyazıt in the Ağrı Province, outside the...	0

End of preview. Expand in Data Studio

This is the ECHR dataset, a collection of 11.5K court cases extracted from the public database of the European Court of Human Rights and further annotated by human experts. The dataset was published along with this paper (pleae cite it accordingly!) and can be donwloaded in its original form from this website.

Each instance in this dataset is a court case. Each court case is annotated with the following properties (the columns of the dataframe):

partition: a label indicating dataset partition this court case belongs to ("train", "dev", or "test")
itemid: a code which uniquely identifies this court case
languageisocode: an ISO code describing the language in which the case is reported
respondent: the ISO code of the party being sued or tried (respondents are nation states)
branch: the branch of the Court dealing with the case, indicating at which stage of the trial a judgement was made (it can be one out of "ADMISSIBILITY", "CHAMBER", "GRANDCHAMBER", "COMMITTEE")
date: the date of the judgement
docname: the title of the court case (for example, "ERIKSON v. ITALY")
importance: an "importance score" from 1 (key case) to 4 (unimportant), denoting a case's contribution in the development of case-law
conclusion: a short summary of the case conclusion (for example, "Inadmissible" or "Violation of Art. 6-1; No violation of Art. 10"
judges: the name of the judges
text: the facts brought to the attention of the Court
binary_judgement: a binary label indicating whether an article or protocol was (1) or wasn't (0) violated

Downloads last month: 80