text stringlengths 44 390k | embeddings listlengths 768 768 |
|---|---|
OPINION
McMANUS, Chief Justice.
This proceeding commenced by the filing by appellants of a complaint in the District Court of the First Judicial District, County of Santa Fe, to set aside and vacate an order of the New Mexico State Corporation Commission (hereinafter Commission) granting a Certificate of Public Conveni... | [
-0.038014862686395645,
-0.05529050529003143,
-0.027994783595204353,
0.04078114777803421,
0.07128244638442993,
0.013278743252158165,
0.024412795901298523,
0.04677979648113251,
0.013270340859889984,
-0.05589255318045616,
-0.02496523968875408,
0.058632366359233856,
-0.04500427097082138,
0.047... |
OPINION
LOPEZ, Judge.
A pickup truck collided with Hoyl’s mare which had escaped from Schnaubert’s corral. Plaintiffs are respectively the passenger, driver and owner of the pickup. Plaintiffs sued defendants for negligence. Defendants’ motions for summary judgment were granted. Plaintiffs appeal only from the summary ... | [
-0.06293550133705139,
-0.028508123010396957,
-0.037795498967170715,
0.006757605355232954,
0.0635359063744545,
-0.043594930320978165,
0.06039545312523842,
0.035123322159051895,
-0.012406514026224613,
-0.017565561458468437,
-0.01725195161998272,
0.009148829616606236,
-0.051891226321458817,
0... |
OPINION
LOPEZ, Judge.
Defendant purchased a vehicle from one Beaty, a/k/a Harry Jorgenson. He was tried and convicted of receiving a stolen vehicle contrary to § 64-9-5, N.M.S.A.1953 (2d Repl. Vol. 9, pt. 2). He raises six points for reversal relating to the relevancy and sufficiency of the evidence and to the refusal ... | [
-0.013079431839287281,
-0.03451006859540939,
-0.03621428459882736,
0.036088231950998306,
0.06235489994287491,
-0.0008798674098215997,
0.027534879744052887,
0.01382787711918354,
0.008310254663228989,
-0.029365437105298042,
0.04743000119924545,
0.05702792853116989,
-0.06697876751422882,
0.00... |
OPINION
HERNANDEZ, Judge.
Plaintiffs appeal from a summary judgment in favor of the defendants. Plaintiff Olson, an employee of the Model Cities Program and nine other plaintiffs, members of the board of directors or employees of United Child Care, Inc., brought suit against defendants, responsible for preparing certai... | [
0.0012539816088974476,
-0.04817682132124901,
-0.02521180547773838,
0.009667876176536083,
0.02261817641556263,
0.013104661367833614,
0.033631011843681335,
0.040802933275699615,
0.028849218040704727,
-0.03370587155222893,
-0.005287494510412216,
0.04629546031355858,
-0.04903718829154968,
0.06... |
OPINION
WOOD, Chief Judge.
Convicted of two counts of forgery, defendant appeals. Section 40A-16-9, N.M. S.A.1953 (2d Repl.Vol. 6). The convictions were on the basis that defendant was an accessory, or aider and abettor. See §§ 40A-1-14 and 41-6-34, N.M.S.A.1953 (2d Repl.Vol. 6); State v. Nance, 77 N.M. 39, 419 P.2d 24... | [
0.000034666758438106626,
-0.04713267460465431,
-0.02709190547466278,
0.0005660403985530138,
0.0570647194981575,
0.031040027737617493,
0.022738240659236908,
0.007066031917929649,
0.011595469899475574,
-0.03687049075961113,
0.04847019165754318,
0.05199507623910904,
-0.040680501610040665,
0.0... |
OPINION
HERNANDEZ, Judge.
The circtimstances out of which this appeal arose are as follows: The plaintiffs on or about August 28, 1971 contacted the defendants seeking to rent a house owned by defendants and located in the Village of Corrales. On that date an oral lease was entered into the term of which was one of the... | [
-0.030605748295783997,
-0.028819283470511436,
-0.029300479218363762,
-0.01564490795135498,
0.03607974201440811,
0.034008752554655075,
0.047536008059978485,
0.025509219616651535,
0.015147039666771889,
-0.026779944077134132,
0.016850676387548447,
0.040257152169942856,
-0.05182260274887085,
0... |
OPINION
LOPEZ, Judge.
Defendant was charged with fraud pursuant to § 40A-16-6, N.M.S.A. 1953 (2d Repl.Vol. 6) and conspiracy to commit fraud pursuant to § 40A-28-2, N.M.S.A. 1953 (2d Repl.Vol. 6). An alleged co-conspirator, Mary Lou Ward, was charged only with conspiracy. Prior to trial Mary Lou Ward died. At trial the... | [
0.018397290259599686,
-0.03104802779853344,
-0.042393144220113754,
0.016489114612340927,
0.08935143798589706,
-0.009839581325650215,
0.0125817209482193,
0.04083835706114769,
0.008254611864686012,
-0.011542108841240406,
0.015367529354989529,
0.041622623801231384,
-0.05853020027279854,
0.040... |
Original Proceeding on Certiorari
Ordered that petition for writ of certiorari be and the same is hereby denied.
Further ordered that the record in Court of Appeals Cause No. 1108, 85 N.M. 655, 515 P.2d 659 be and the same is hereby returned to the Clerk of the Court of Appeals. | [
-0.01607704348862171,
-0.027764970436692238,
-0.021293094381690025,
0.0071290223859250546,
0.07854409515857697,
0.04196428135037422,
0.03735502064228058,
0.009973405860364437,
0.0025983857922255993,
-0.05094568431377411,
0.013208280317485332,
0.0038953402545303106,
-0.03484262526035309,
0.... |
OPINION
STEPHENSON, Justice.
Petitioner-Appellant (“Southwestern”) filed suit in Chaves County District Court pursuant to § 72-5-4, N.M.S.A.1953 for the recovery of certain property taxes paid under protest for the 1970 tax year. The case was tried to the court. After making its decision, the court entered judgment den... | [
-0.03846193477511406,
-0.026019517332315445,
-0.0239595677703619,
0.03740933537483215,
0.04002141207456589,
0.001939244568347931,
0.030521437525749207,
0.013967663049697876,
-0.002293949481099844,
-0.05262304097414017,
0.025559475645422935,
0.051025230437517166,
-0.05280393734574318,
0.047... |
Original Proceeding on Certiorari
Ordered that petition for writ of certiorari be and the same is hereby denied.
Further ordered that the record in Court of Appeals Cause No. 1016, 85 N.M. 19, 508 P.2d 1316, be and the same is hereby returned to the Clerk of the Court of Appeals. | [
-0.018219321966171265,
-0.03323885053396225,
-0.010574406944215298,
0.011586878448724747,
0.06387520581483841,
0.04324827343225479,
0.03638547658920288,
0.00835494790226221,
-0.005939633585512638,
-0.046960484236478806,
0.012937218882143497,
0.00007989242294570431,
-0.035500600934028625,
0... |
OPINION
McMANUS, Chief Justice.
This suit was brought in the District Court of Santa Fe County to recover on a promissory note, to foreclose an assignment as collateral given as security for the note and for the sale of the property covered by the assignment as collateral. After trial by the court, judgment was entered... | [
-0.046119093894958496,
-0.06529354304075241,
-0.008054722100496292,
0.033446211367845535,
0.03297601267695427,
0.02755776047706604,
0.039313267916440964,
0.024467548355460167,
0.01470581628382206,
-0.0661306381225586,
0.03816564008593559,
0.03801245987415314,
-0.052569858729839325,
0.02495... |
OPINION
HERNANDEZ, Judge.
This action arose out of a collision between a private automobile driven by the plaintiff and a tractor-trailer owned by the corporate defendant, United NuclearHomestake Partners, and driven by individual defendant Gonzales, an employee of United Nuclear. The accident occurred on November 21, ... | [
-0.02139066718518734,
-0.034288354218006134,
-0.02355334535241127,
-0.019170451909303665,
0.03182637691497803,
-0.001579143339768052,
0.03614256903529167,
0.06493090093135834,
0.004528738558292389,
-0.03217250108718872,
0.056002177298069,
0.04280441626906395,
-0.018248358741402626,
0.02106... |
OPINION
MARTINEZ, Justice.
This is an appeal from an action brought by Sierra Life Insurance Company, an Idaho corporation, for damages arising from an alleged breach of contract by First National Life Insurance Company, an Alabama corporation, or in the alternative for specific performance and damages for the past fai... | [
-0.013704045675694942,
-0.021176274865865707,
-0.018297838047146797,
-0.008146325126290321,
0.08837943524122238,
0.00829822663217783,
0.029461944475769997,
0.006982740480452776,
0.039707738906145096,
-0.02976665273308754,
0.029187500476837158,
0.05456897243857384,
-0.06501549482345581,
0.0... |
OPINION
WOOD, Chief Judge.
This appeal involves two claims of damage to merchandise shipped by the manufacturer in California to plaintiff in Alamogordo, New Mexico. Defendant is a common carrier “ * * * operating pursuant to the laws of the United States and the regulations of the Interstate Commerce Commission.” “ * ... | [
-0.01944437250494957,
-0.018102359026670456,
-0.006070035509765148,
0.04369961470365524,
0.05937700346112251,
0.002038428792729974,
-0.002470380859449506,
0.015326540917158127,
0.00774432672187686,
-0.03365662321448326,
0.014706078916788101,
0.017688211053609848,
-0.0467953160405159,
0.027... |
OPINION
HERNANDEZ, Judge.
Defendant was convicted by a jury on one count of aggravated battery (§ 40A-3-5, N.M.S.A.1953 (2d Repl. Vol. 6)) and sentenced to a prison term of not less than two and not more than ten years. He urges reversal of his conviction on two grounds: (1) that the victim of the battery consented to ... | [
-0.028326401486992836,
-0.032745447009801865,
-0.0421333834528923,
-0.02647228166460991,
0.0459345318377018,
0.015781933441758156,
0.07385924458503723,
-0.008138293400406837,
0.009765630587935448,
0.00016560545191168785,
0.04538431391119957,
0.025744633749127388,
-0.058455415070056915,
-0.... |
OPINION
McMANUS, Chief Justice.
The District Court of Sandoval County, New Mexico, entered a final decree in cause No. 3650, Freedman v. Montano, et al. The decree was based on a stipulation signed by all the parties, dated June 20, 1969, and purported to adjudicate the titles of various claimants to a number of tracts... | [
-0.013850454241037369,
-0.010241182520985603,
-0.009984983131289482,
0.0047102454118430614,
0.05531365051865578,
0.003037635236978531,
0.041196394711732864,
0.014278843998908997,
0.008214940316975117,
-0.03933766856789589,
-0.015944497659802437,
0.04999108985066414,
-0.0547146201133728,
0.... |
OPINION
HENDLEY, Judge.
Convicted of the unlawful distribution of a controlled substance in violation of § 54 — 11-22 (A), N.M.S.A.1953 (Int.Supp. 1972) defendant appeals asserting that “criminal intent” is an essential element of unlawful distribution of a controlled substance, and that the instructions to the jury fa... | [
0.010102027095854282,
-0.002969230292364955,
-0.025834163650870323,
-0.026940740644931793,
0.08514551818370819,
-0.008840248920023441,
0.03630576282739639,
-0.001313431654125452,
0.0126844746991992,
-0.0085353534668684,
0.02459467388689518,
0.01705153100192547,
-0.07043179124593735,
0.0604... |
OPINION
WOOD, Chief Judge.
Convicted of unlawful possession of a narcotic drug — heroin—defendant appeals. See §§ 54-7-2 and 54-7-13, N.M.S.A.1953 (Repl.Vol. 8, pt. 2, Supp.1971). The issue is the validity of the application for a search warrant.
Defendant contends the allegations in the application, which refer to pro... | [
-0.0136514101177454,
-0.014567251317203045,
-0.029786380007863045,
0.007214286830276251,
0.07134655117988586,
-0.016389010474085808,
0.058405715972185135,
-0.0036075690295547247,
0.023250820115208626,
-0.0599714070558548,
0.023193923756480217,
0.045702748000621796,
-0.06375356018543243,
0.... |
OPINION
WOOD, Chief Judge.
This is a workmen’s compensation case. Plaintiff, employed as an assembly worker, had emerged from the door of the employer’s building and was on the way to her car in the employer’s parking lot. Her work shift had ended; she was going home. Three to six feet from the door she slipped and fel... | [
-0.0067059011198580265,
-0.014001400209963322,
-0.03240840882062912,
-0.019750893115997314,
0.06645029783248901,
0.02885955385863781,
0.08801684528589249,
0.04022911563515663,
-0.004231237340718508,
-0.03576838597655296,
-0.012362932786345482,
0.016079114750027657,
-0.049978602677583694,
0... |
OPINION
MARTINEZ, Justice.
Plaintiff (appellant) filed its petition for peremptory writ of mandamus on April 20, 1972 in the District Court of Sandoval County. It sought to compel the defendant, Sandoval County Commission (appellees), pursuant to § 14-19-6, N.M.S.A. 1953 (Repl.VoI. 3, 1968), to approve the subdivision ... | [
-0.04742548242211342,
-0.012077734805643559,
-0.0700463205575943,
0.0031615609768778086,
0.0292514581233263,
0.012980613857507706,
0.0334363728761673,
0.009092401713132858,
0.013836367055773735,
-0.05206845700740814,
0.016069253906607628,
0.05048127844929695,
-0.04909992963075638,
0.040606... |
OPINION
SUTIN, Judge.
The state appeals from an order of the trial court which suppressed the evidence seized by the police from a car occupied by the defendants. We affirm.
Defendants were charged (1) with illegal possession of marijuana contrary to § 54 — 11-23(A), (B)(3), N.M.S.A.1953 (Repl. Vol. 8, pt. 2, 1973 Supp... | [
-0.03563836216926575,
-0.008161966688930988,
-0.03883862495422363,
0.029485447332262993,
0.040411848574876785,
-0.033557116985321045,
0.055860985070466995,
0.01417206134647131,
0.023773469030857086,
-0.0472998209297657,
-0.0010652834316715598,
0.05214548856019974,
-0.03623955696821213,
0.0... |
OPINION
MONTOYA, Justice.
This action was brought in the District Court of Taos County, New Mexico, to recover $5,000 paid on the purchase price of an automatic car wash. It was alleged that fraudulent conduct and misrepresentation of defendant-appellant (appellant) induced plaintiff-appellee (appellee) to enter into t... | [
-0.0335252620279789,
-0.02914915233850479,
-0.009689646773040295,
0.05072978883981705,
0.04883250221610069,
0.03248659893870354,
0.05439157411456108,
0.01408088393509388,
0.02223723754286766,
-0.02724931761622429,
0.038006044924259186,
0.0874447152018547,
-0.029720142483711243,
0.021702067... |
OPINION
STEPHENSON, Justice.
This litigation had its inception in a suit filed by Eva A. Sanchez against the Credit Bureau of Albuquerque, Inc. (Credit Bureau) alleging that she had been sued and garnished by the Credit Bureau which was unlawfully practicing law, and seeking a money judgment. Subsequently other litigat... | [
-0.0013279488775879145,
-0.05292234197258949,
0.0045110615901649,
-0.03615794703364372,
0.022136498242616653,
0.0032665026374161243,
0.028018467128276825,
0.005601402837783098,
-0.0020525644067674875,
-0.03337817266583443,
0.008572077378630638,
0.03925175219774246,
-0.02172437310218811,
0.... |
OPINION
WOOD, Chief Judge.
A car-bicycle collision occurred on a two-lane section of Montgomery Street in Albuquerque. Plaintiff sued Avila, the police officer driver of the car, and his employer, the City of Albuquerque. The trial court first dismissed the City and then granted summary judgment in favor of Avila. The ... | [
-0.019557498395442963,
-0.020974986255168915,
-0.0234134029597044,
0.010909507982432842,
0.03451699763536453,
0.022340623661875725,
0.03997982665896416,
0.01802702061831951,
0.027704058215022087,
-0.06765315681695938,
0.05846719443798065,
0.05421493574976921,
-0.05140621215105057,
0.010084... |
OPINION
WOOD, Chief Judge.
This interlocutory appeal involves the Children’s Code and the authority of the children’s court to act on a petition to retain custody of an adjudicated delinquent. Three items require discussion: (1) the caption of the case; (2) jurisdiction of this Court; and (3) jurisdiction of the childr... | [
-0.035179730504751205,
-0.03516208752989769,
-0.023842209950089455,
-0.02969936653971672,
0.0343124121427536,
0.009866324253380299,
0.0500573068857193,
-0.021040501073002815,
-0.0015325465938076377,
-0.050310950726270676,
-0.014797867275774479,
0.0008142797159962356,
-0.053212083876132965,
... |
OPINION
WOOD, Chief Judge.
Convicted of unlawfully distributing controlled substances (amphetamines and LSD), defendants appeal. Section 54-11-22(A)(2). N.M.S.A.1953 (1972 Int.Supp.). The dispositive issue concerns inspection of a transcript of the grand jury testimony of a witness.
Cross-examining the State’s witness,... | [
-0.00433928519487381,
0.00018284260295331478,
-0.035423487424850464,
0.042469631880521774,
0.08180203288793564,
0.011323664337396622,
0.058775123208761215,
0.018513701856136322,
0.029552089050412178,
-0.06987542659044266,
0.028343016281723976,
0.07529778778553009,
-0.05397498235106468,
0.0... |
Original Proceeding on Certiorari
Ordered that petition for writ of certiorari be and the same is hereby denied.
Further ordered that the record in Court of Appeals Cause No. 1117, 85 N.M. 496, 513 P.2d 1278 be and the same is hereby returned to the Clerk of the Court of Appeals. , | [
-0.02257775329053402,
-0.03369971364736557,
-0.00935492292046547,
0.0156501904129982,
0.07084869593381882,
0.047656845301389694,
0.03888236731290817,
0.008469058200716972,
-0.0008940094267018139,
-0.04532180726528168,
0.00931489933282137,
0.011453669518232346,
-0.03553098067641258,
0.05762... |
OPINION
MONTOYA, Justice.
Ray Phelps (appellee) filed a complaint for divorce from Ferinez Phelps (appellant), which divorce was granted. The judgment was entered on September 15, 1967, awarding custody of the three children to appellant, and requiring appellee to pay child support on behalf of the minor children.
Due ... | [
-0.04082062840461731,
-0.03669821470975876,
0.0064439596608281136,
0.009755843318998814,
0.02925974875688553,
0.007514835800975561,
0.01749471016228199,
0.005559065379202366,
0.00007311684748856351,
-0.03627648204565048,
0.011619196273386478,
0.06158503517508507,
-0.056278541684150696,
0.0... |
OPINION
HENDLEY, Judge.
Defendant was convicted of possession of more than one ounce of marijuana. Sections 54-9-3 and 54-9-4, N.M.S.A.1953 (Repl.Vol.1962, pt. 2, Supp.1971).
Defendant contends, among other things, that his motion to suppress should have been granted. We agree. The issues of standing and unlawful searc... | [
-0.02687958814203739,
-0.010234278626739979,
-0.011353382840752602,
0.003822391154244542,
0.06869964301586151,
-0.0016618375666439533,
0.03251982852816582,
-0.009154234081506729,
-0.021508891135454178,
-0.055818308144807816,
0.0038348352536559105,
0.033824995160102844,
-0.04407668858766556,
... |
OPINION
MONTOYA, Justice.
This action began in the District Court of Bernalillo County when the petitioner, State of New Mexico through its Highway Department (State), filed three suits under the special alternative procedure provided by § 22-9-39 et seq., N.M.S.A., 1953 Comp. (1973 Pocket Supp.), to condemn property f... | [
0.002762448275461793,
-0.03708991780877113,
-0.013160426169633865,
0.005279802717268467,
0.07403577119112015,
0.00472560990601778,
0.03531757742166519,
0.016893964260816574,
0.01062559150159359,
-0.04753149300813675,
0.03784702345728874,
0.06653176248073578,
-0.04208044335246086,
0.0438784... |
OPINION
WOOD, Chief Judge.
The appeal is concerned with plaintiff’s effort to set aside a settlement of his workmen’s compensation claim. Plaintiff claims: (1) the settlement was entered by mistake and (2) the settlement had not been completed.
Plaintiff received a compensable injury. Temporary total compensation benef... | [
-0.031553611159324646,
-0.014990340918302536,
-0.02512645348906517,
0.002802798757329583,
0.04309781268239021,
0.020343830808997154,
0.0511176697909832,
0.03320106118917465,
0.006387334782630205,
-0.041703563183546066,
-0.001800818950869143,
0.05317569524049759,
-0.03534000739455223,
0.034... |
OPINION
HENDLEY, Judge.
The defendants were tried together on separate criminal informations charging them with first degree murder. The charges grew out of the same set of facts. Defendant Holden was charged as a principal; defendant Spikes as an accessory. After a jury trial Holden was convicted of voluntary manslaug... | [
-0.023586120456457138,
-0.016717197373509407,
-0.04007059708237648,
0.008322244510054588,
0.038111019879579544,
-0.006237521301954985,
0.05252796411514282,
0.015337090007960796,
0.007237339857965708,
-0.057190679013729095,
0.05624580383300781,
0.02048243209719658,
-0.036734335124492645,
0.... |
OPINION
WOOD, Chief Judge.
Defendant shot and killed decedent with a handgun. There are conflicting versions of the shooting. Defendant claims he had stored the loaded gun in a chair on the previous evening; that on the day of the shooting he pulled the gun from the chair by its barrel when the hammer cocked; and that ... | [
-0.028547387570142746,
-0.02441161498427391,
-0.04416641965508461,
-0.016910340636968613,
0.05411096662282944,
0.03064666874706745,
0.09951639175415039,
0.0006884729955345392,
-0.01785164140164852,
-0.01681695133447647,
0.036651611328125,
0.018497969955205917,
-0.04119761288166046,
0.02189... |
OPINION
GARCIA, Judge.
Defendant was convicted of trafficking in a controlled substance, Meperidine (Demerol) in violation of NMSA 1978, Section 30-31-20 (Repl.Pamp.1980). He filed a timely appeal from this conviction. The issues raised by defendant on appeal relate to the disclosure of the identity of the confidential... | [
-0.049254160374403,
-0.018978096544742584,
-0.05571365728974342,
0.012153265997767448,
0.0603230781853199,
-0.00405049929395318,
0.05572085827589035,
-0.012515345588326454,
-0.001348824822343886,
-0.040241993963718414,
0.030513674020767212,
0.058463919907808304,
-0.058286577463150024,
0.03... |
OPINION
WALTERS, Justice.
We accepted certification from the Court of Appeals on the question whether caliche is a mineral reserved to the United States under the Stock-Raising Homestead Act of 1916, 39 Stat. 862 (1916) (SRHA), and particularly under 43 U.S.C. § 299 (1982) of that Act. We determine that caliche is such... | [
-0.023793714120984077,
-0.005126760806888342,
-0.059192806482315063,
0.030889568850398064,
0.03487217053771019,
0.00038825967931188643,
0.04161659628152847,
0.022066455334424973,
0.03641876205801964,
-0.03635531663894653,
-0.0036635647993534803,
0.05017716810107231,
-0.04744458571076393,
0... |
OPINION
FEDERICI, Chief Justice.
This case is before us on removal from the New Mexico State Corporation Commission (Commission) pursuant to N.M. Const. Article XI, Section 7 (Cum.Supp.1985). The proceeding before the Commission was initiated by Mountain States Telephone and Telegraph Company (Mountain Bell) to determi... | [
-0.021766304969787598,
-0.04230494424700737,
-0.011157454922795296,
0.022684818133711815,
0.06351149827241898,
-0.005577532574534416,
0.026244858279824257,
0.03320421651005745,
0.013978769071400166,
-0.02534092776477337,
-0.01850898191332817,
0.07281368970870972,
-0.06259115040302277,
0.02... |
ORDER
This matter came before the Court upon an Order to Show Cause why Ronald Grenko (Grenko) should not be held in contempt of this Court for failure to comply with a stipulated agreement between Grenko and the Supreme Court Disciplinary Board (Board) which was the result of a disciplinary action pursuant to this Cou... | [
-0.02048618346452713,
-0.006404999643564224,
-0.013796753250062466,
0.00018399870896246284,
0.03169891610741615,
0.009610205888748169,
0.035872604697942734,
0.015146198682487011,
-0.02819950506091118,
-0.030578067526221275,
-0.013729244470596313,
0.049439769238233566,
-0.07743290811777115,
... |
OPINION
DONNELLY, Chief Judge.
Appellant, Board of Education of Taos Municipal Schools (Taos Board), appeals from an administrative decision of the State Board of Education (State Board), overturning the Taos Board’s action discharging Theresa Singleton, a teacher. Taos Board raises three issues on appeal: (1) error in... | [
-0.02275995723903179,
-0.04894913733005524,
-0.02636989951133728,
0.026858173310756683,
0.027220649644732475,
0.0021296886261552572,
0.04439541697502136,
0.05819981172680855,
-0.012546778656542301,
0.005662334617227316,
-0.02307586744427681,
0.09863646328449249,
-0.06338659673929214,
0.042... |
OPINION
HENDLEY, Judge.
The issue in this case concerns the extent this court will consider pro se pleadings filed by a party who is represented by counsel.
Here, a docketing statement was filed by trial counsel, raising three issues: (1) an involuntary guilty plea because the plea agreement required defendant and his ... | [
-0.041209232062101364,
-0.02973547764122486,
-0.012450180016458035,
0.0011279453756287694,
0.04767384007573128,
-0.007347612641751766,
0.022757763043045998,
0.007596767973154783,
0.010957509279251099,
-0.038725003600120544,
0.024951476603746414,
0.07319454103708267,
-0.060215894132852554,
... |
OPINION
NEAL, Judge.
Plaintiff brought a negligence action against Carl John Francis and Thunder Corporation (defendants). Thunder moved for summary judgment, arguing that it owed no duty to the plaintiff under Doe v. Hendricks, 92 N.M. 499, 590 P.2d 647 (Ct.App.1979), and that the accident was not foreseeable citing, ... | [
-0.0165670495480299,
0.005205166060477495,
-0.013432745821774006,
0.01190396398305893,
0.0455210879445076,
-0.012999339029192924,
0.03424695134162903,
0.05038053169846535,
0.00581758888438344,
0.0031904014758765697,
-0.018452154472470284,
0.05636987090110779,
-0.04327263683080673,
0.048242... |
OPINION
STOWERS, Justice.
Phil Weldon (Weldon) filed suit to recover damages under an insurance policy issued by Commercial Union Assurance Company (Commercial). After a non-jury trial, judgment was entered in favor of Weldon. Commercial appeals the trial court judgment. We reverse.
The following facts are pertinent to... | [
0.00966636836528778,
-0.023395055904984474,
-0.0171362292021513,
0.013498579151928425,
0.06901466101408005,
0.0006105624488554895,
0.05519750714302063,
-0.01872478425502777,
0.038178808987140656,
-0.046220455318689346,
0.022816678509116173,
0.0076477075926959515,
-0.07110951840877533,
0.02... |
OPINION
HENDLEY, Judge.
These three appeals are from transfer orders pursuant to NMSA 1978, Section 32-1-30 (Repl.Pamp.1981). References to the Children’s Code are to NMSA 1978, Sections 32-1-1 to -53 (Repl.Pamp.1981 and Cum.Supp.1984), unless otherwise noted. For simplicity’s sake the child in No. 8377 will be referre... | [
-0.05433059111237526,
-0.020247071981430054,
-0.01642775535583496,
-0.020367922261357307,
0.0534471832215786,
-0.0042612734250724316,
0.04007306322455406,
0.022448118776082993,
0.019123390316963196,
-0.035760171711444855,
-0.0342334546148777,
0.017999742180109024,
-0.05246610939502716,
0.0... |
OPINION
STOWERS, Justice.
Mary K. Austin (Mrs. Austin) petitioned this Court on a writ of certiorari to review the judgment of the Court of Appeals. The Court of Appeals partially reversed an order of the district court which stated that Donald O. Austin (Austin) was to pay his ex-wife, Mrs. Austin, 45 percent of his d... | [
-0.032326750457286835,
-0.03930550068616867,
0.014706534333527088,
0.04952649027109146,
0.05417793244123459,
-0.0065774861723184586,
0.018968217074871063,
0.006242701783776283,
-0.025734959170222282,
-0.03707412630319595,
-0.0019754974637180567,
0.0686948150396347,
-0.010296839289367199,
0... |
OPINION
BIVINS, Judge.
The state appeals, pursuant to NMSA 1978, Section 39 — 3—3(B)(2), from an order of the district court suppressing evidence. The correctness of the suppression order turns on whether defendant’s warrantless arrest was proper. The sole issue on appeal is whether Officer C lawfully arrested defendan... | [
-0.04970088228583336,
-0.023908784613013268,
-0.02294921875,
-0.004999721888452768,
0.02083013206720352,
-0.012474877759814262,
0.0496969111263752,
0.008455170318484306,
-0.034327082335948944,
-0.05379721522331238,
0.010255185887217522,
0.041151013225317,
-0.030129967257380486,
0.036423731... |
OPINION
NEAL, Judge.
The trial court granted defendants’ motion to suppress evidence and dismiss defendants’ grand jury indictment with prejudice. The state appeals. We affirm in part and reverse in part, holding that the suppression of the evidence is a sufficient remedy for the prosecutorial misconduct in this case, ... | [
-0.03219364583492279,
-0.03099350444972515,
-0.0036946723703294992,
0.04140138626098633,
0.06579572707414627,
0.009333932772278786,
0.03459441661834717,
0.012487834319472313,
-0.010201679542660713,
-0.0547134093940258,
-0.002363690873607993,
0.028678858652710915,
-0.03781953826546669,
0.04... |
OPINION
SOSA, Senior Justice.
Plaintiffs brought this action seeking to order defendant First National Bank (FNB) to pay them the proceeds of Certificates of Deposit (CD’s) established by Zettie Hazel Lamar, deceased, which named plaintiffs as beneficiaries Payable on Death (P.O.D. Payees). The co-personal representati... | [
-0.02478957362473011,
-0.03724066913127899,
0.007845410145819187,
0.02140306681394577,
0.07492385059595108,
0.02388089895248413,
0.00759671488776803,
0.031607210636138916,
0.0229048915207386,
-0.02375967614352703,
-0.005756134632974863,
0.03259245678782463,
-0.06552090495824814,
0.00894048... |
OPINION
PER CURIUM.
This matter having come before this Court after disciplinary proceedings initiated pursuant to NMSA 1978, Rules Governing Discipline, Rule 12 (Repl.1985), wherein Attorney L.A. “Skeet” McCulloch was summarily suspended from the practice of law on June 12, 1985, for conduct involving dishonesty, misr... | [
-0.05008160322904587,
-0.02677738666534424,
-0.03526769205927849,
0.008000064641237259,
0.027528276666998863,
-0.03080928325653076,
0.06706920266151428,
0.032173458486795425,
0.00816410779953003,
-0.03365543484687805,
-0.008064573630690575,
0.05062020197510719,
-0.0507921539247036,
0.02077... |
OPINION
DONNELLY, Chief Judge.
Defendant, Donald Ray Gardner, appeals from convictions on five felony charges: one count of fraudulent sale or offer of securities; one count of conspiracy to commit fraud; one count of criminal solicitation; and two counts of criminal fraud over $2,500.
Two issues are raised on appeal: ... | [
-0.00041286551277153194,
-0.024591507390141487,
-0.013528690673410892,
0.044876329600811005,
0.0833633616566658,
0.013363249599933624,
0.019331758841872215,
0.023258013650774956,
-0.01896285079419613,
-0.039159972220659256,
0.007087530568242073,
0.09642567485570908,
-0.05380826070904732,
0... |
OPINION
WALTERS, Justice.
On September 18, 1985 we issued an alternative writ prohibiting Respondent from further, proceeding to enforce a judgment in Los Alamos County District Court Cause No. LA 84-129(c). On October 22, 1985, the writ was made permanent.
Our decision to issue the permanent writ came upon the undispu... | [
-0.014986402355134487,
-0.031175246462225914,
-0.013623387552797794,
-0.01796276867389679,
0.04467242583632469,
-0.01345737837255001,
0.046729471534490585,
0.0380476750433445,
-0.019765013828873634,
-0.06386393308639526,
0.025301873683929443,
0.03201381117105484,
-0.03013824112713337,
0.05... |
OPINION
DONNELLY, Chief Judge.
Defendant, Twila Muise, appeals her convictions and sentences of false imprisonment and battery following a jury trial. Six issues are raised on appeal: (1) whether defendant had a right to a magistrate court trial on the misdemeanor charges; (2) sufficiency of the evidence; (3) error in ... | [
-0.020242488011717796,
-0.052353665232658386,
-0.056194379925727844,
0.02168477699160576,
0.054073184728622437,
0.003152078716084361,
0.056261997669935226,
0.036602333188056946,
-0.03227946534752846,
-0.022840088233351707,
0.04056653752923012,
0.04932785779237747,
-0.048614513128995895,
0.... |
OPINION
MINZNER, Judge.
Respondent James Lee Peterson appeals the trial court’s determination that his parental rights to a daughter, C.P., and a son, E.P., should be terminated. Although the court also terminated the rights of the children’s mother, Cynthia La Dale Peterson, from whom respondent is divorced, she has n... | [
-0.027892908081412315,
-0.020727116614580154,
-0.010059069842100143,
0.02141556330025196,
0.06621812283992767,
0.017266400158405304,
0.02886667475104332,
0.016453057527542114,
-0.006661193910986185,
-0.05801302194595337,
0.0004063471278641373,
0.03788714483380318,
-0.05240212753415108,
0.0... |
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING ON CERTIORARI
Ordered that petition for writ of certiorari be and the same is hereby denied.
Further ordered that the record in Court of Appeals Causes No. 1010, 1011, 1012 and 1013, 85 N.M. 254, 511 P.2d 580 be and the same are hereby returned to the Clerk of the Court of Appeals. | [
-0.017181899398565292,
-0.023472385480999947,
-0.027987251058220863,
0.008185886777937412,
0.06665963679552078,
0.04499279707670212,
0.04147379472851753,
0.007832811214029789,
-0.004923360887914896,
-0.050755348056554794,
-0.0015629837289452553,
0.009129222482442856,
-0.038308035582304,
0.... |
OPINION
WOOD, Chief Judge.
The indictment charges defendant, in three counts, of distributing a controlled substance to a person under eighteen years of age, contrary to § 54 — 11-21, N.M.S.A. 1953 (Repl.Vol. 8, pt. 2, Supp.1973). Two of the counts involve marijuana. See § 54 — 11-21 (A), supra. One count involves peyo... | [
-0.01630912534892559,
0.002133803442120552,
-0.04455006122589111,
0.009751219302415848,
0.06614600121974945,
-0.04317014664411545,
0.033681534230709076,
0.017586039379239082,
0.029508603736758232,
-0.031165579333901405,
0.036285337060689926,
0.03852942958474159,
-0.05836985260248184,
0.040... |
OPINION
SUTIN, Judge.
Plaintiff appeals from an adverse jury verdict and judgment based on a claim for damages against defendant, Dr. Beaman, a licensed ophthalmologist, for malpractice arising out of an operation to lift the right eyelid. We affirm.
Plaintiff raises two claims of error, (1) giving two instructions to ... | [
-0.011776193045079708,
0.021478865295648575,
-0.027543717995285988,
-0.02043929509818554,
0.03288278728723526,
0.0276123508810997,
0.0846593976020813,
0.014128387905657291,
-0.009480396285653114,
-0.006263076793402433,
0.014773726463317871,
0.061005305498838425,
-0.05378023162484169,
0.005... |
OPINION
SUTIN, Judge.
Defendant was convicted of possession of heroin with intent to distribute it. Section 54-11-20(A) (3), (B), N.M.S.A. 1953 (1972 Int.Supp.). He appeals. We affirm.
Defendant was charged with “Trafficking in a Controlled Substance, to-wit: Heroin, contrary to Chapter 84, New Mexico Laws 1972”; that ... | [
-0.009398511610925198,
-0.013567712157964706,
-0.07010141015052795,
-0.018532276153564453,
0.08353818953037262,
-0.011739779263734818,
0.05525755137205124,
0.0016581877134740353,
0.030430329963564873,
-0.03184090182185173,
0.012154442258179188,
0.03404590114951134,
-0.07776108384132385,
0.... |
OPINION
MONTOYA, Justice.
Appellant Groendyke Transport, Inc. (Groendyke) in 1965 filed a petition with appellee New Mexico State Corporation Commission (Commission) attacking the validity and issuance of Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity No. 895-1 held by intervenor-appellee E. B. Law & Son, Inc. (Law), ... | [
-0.06367827206850052,
-0.016344092786312103,
-0.027132950723171234,
0.033986564725637436,
0.018018575385212898,
0.014078792184591293,
0.020630614832043648,
0.04528806358575821,
-0.00944601558148861,
-0.04490135610103607,
-0.0005124958697706461,
0.08081281930208206,
-0.05954322591423988,
0.... |
Original Proceeding On Certiorari
Now, therefore, it is ordered that the writ of certiorari issued herein on January 3, 1973 be and the same is hereby discharged as having been improvidently issued.
Further ordered that the record in Court of Appeals 84 N.M. 453, 504 P.2d 1086, be and the same is hereby returned to the... | [
0.0013057207688689232,
-0.011710776947438717,
-0.0024987896904349327,
-0.016207458451390266,
0.05643210932612419,
-0.0039588636718690395,
0.04902701824903488,
0.0323563814163208,
-0.002134333597496152,
-0.02519477903842926,
0.005868152715265751,
-0.01589772291481495,
-0.03438258916139603,
... |
OPINION
MINZNER, Judge.
These are appeals from criminal contempt citations issued, after notice and a hearing, at the conclusion of a criminal trial. The trial court held in contempt Michael F. McCormick and Ronald R. Walker, district attorneys who were involved in prosecuting the criminal charges, and Deputy Chief Ste... | [
-0.018257059156894684,
-0.043075814843177795,
0.00551948556676507,
0.0030410399194806814,
0.02461157739162445,
0.016492296010255814,
0.045106373727321625,
0.022793566808104515,
-0.001451237709261477,
-0.04829101637005806,
-0.033142540603876114,
0.0700872614979744,
-0.06485625356435776,
0.0... |
OPINION
MINZNER, Judge.
Defendant Thomas J. Gonzalez appeals from the trial court’s order, entered in a consolidated proceeding, that found a 1969 judicial sale valid and quieted plaintiffs’ title on the basis of that sale. At the sale, plaintiff Esther O. Gonzalez, defendant’s former wife, had acquired his fractional ... | [
-0.011959090828895569,
-0.04731156677007675,
-0.007353357505053282,
0.0009297080687247217,
0.05144220218062401,
0.04717748984694481,
0.01759907230734825,
0.018866876140236855,
0.010029066354036331,
-0.026337880641222,
-0.006097665522247553,
0.05666869878768921,
-0.04829293116927147,
0.0546... |
OPINION
RIORDAN, Justice.
Alvino Chacon (defendant) was found to be an habitual felon and his basic sentences for two 1983 felony convictions were increased by four years. Defendant appeals the enhancement of his sentence on the basis of NMSA 1978, Crim.P.Rule 37 (Cum. Supp.1984). The Court of Appeals reversed the disp... | [
-0.0339893139898777,
-0.045390114188194275,
-0.01766398921608925,
0.003916091285645962,
0.053537819534540176,
-0.010338857769966125,
0.05758575350046158,
0.005367031320929527,
-0.024957140907645226,
-0.016338404268026352,
0.013179824687540531,
0.03915294259786606,
-0.050802066922187805,
0.... |
OPINION
HENDLEY, Judge.
Kay’s petition for an increase in child support from ex-husband Dean, a Louisiana resident, was dismissed for lack of personal jurisdiction. We proposed summary affirmance pursuant to NMSA 1978, Crim., Child.Ct., Dom.Rel. & W/C App.Rule 207(d) (Repl.Pamp.1983). We are not persuaded by Kay’s memo... | [
-0.05119572579860687,
-0.06586479395627975,
0.014177165925502777,
0.0164441280066967,
0.06026320904493332,
0.04168223962187767,
0.00931982509791851,
0.026647448539733887,
0.011281619779765606,
-0.04912466183304787,
0.015476875938475132,
0.02729600854218006,
-0.06820934265851974,
0.05437734... |
OPINION
WOOD, Judge.
This appeal involves convictions and sentences of Deutsch for conspiracy, larceny, fraud, embezzlement and forgery in two criminal cases — Bernalillo County District Court Cause Nos. 37206 and 37738. We (1) state the factual background; and discuss (2) enforcement of a plea bargain; (3) the prosecu... | [
-0.01725754700601101,
0.0007135285995900631,
0.0031204321421682835,
0.013095546513795853,
0.06798555701971054,
0.017234500497579575,
0.04830705374479294,
0.03262239322066307,
0.013938919641077518,
-0.028265615925192833,
-0.024226300418376923,
0.04465403035283089,
-0.039947543293237686,
0.0... |
OPINION
, DONNELLY, Chief Judge.
Porfirio Mendoza (husband) appeals from an order issued by the trial court approximately nine years after the entry of the decree of divorce. The single issue raised by husband on appeal challenges the jurisdiction of the district court to modify the property interests of the parties in... | [
-0.05759914219379425,
-0.023054037243127823,
-0.006771469954401255,
0.011943682096898556,
0.04322367161512375,
0.014479477889835835,
0.031088922172784805,
0.034146498888731,
-0.006363965105265379,
-0.04030229523777962,
0.018237408250570297,
0.034206073731184006,
-0.05712812766432762,
0.057... |
OPINION
MINZNER, Judge.
Defendant appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion for a new trial. Defendant’s docketing statement claimed the trial court abused its discretion in denying defendant’s motion. See State v. Volpato, 102 N.M. 383, 696 P.2d 471 (1985). In assigning the case to a limited calendar, this court ... | [
-0.02913781814277172,
-0.031095456331968307,
-0.005234688054770231,
0.02681533247232437,
0.057778555899858475,
0.012520863674581051,
0.056887995451688766,
-0.0001570244348840788,
0.00836257915943861,
-0.046819478273391724,
0.010936054401099682,
0.042320504784584045,
-0.03349028155207634,
0... |
OPINION
WALTERS, Justice.
The suit below was dismissed by the trial court. Appellant states that on appeal he “challenges”:
1. The court’s refusal to consider and decide the issues presented in the motion creatively entitled “Writ of Habeas Data.”
2. The court’s adopted findings of fact, embodied in its dismissal order... | [
-0.034191980957984924,
-0.003220766317099333,
-0.051989369094371796,
0.0025605550035834312,
0.05078725144267082,
0.004600896965712309,
0.035277195274829865,
-0.026084814220666885,
-0.010715059004724026,
-0.036294080317020416,
0.0024702914524823427,
0.04472975805401802,
-0.06158604100346565,
... |
OPINION
DONNELLY, Chief Judge.
Defendant, Molycorp, Inc., (Employer), appeals from a judgment awarding plaintiff workmen’s compensation benefits for total disability under the Workmen’s Compensation Act. Two issues are presented on appeal: (1) claim of lack of substantial medical evidence of causal connection between t... | [
-0.012143607251346111,
0.03029598295688629,
-0.03983268141746521,
0.023608852177858353,
0.05876746401190758,
0.0026680107694119215,
0.05669611319899559,
0.042452167719602585,
-0.00052170071285218,
-0.03248368203639984,
-0.016349108889698982,
0.05656225606799126,
-0.05704231932759285,
0.023... |
OPINION
WALTERS, Justice.
Mary V. Russell filed this action against John R. and Beth Richards for damages resulting from the default and forfeiture of her interest in a real estate contract, and for loss of personal property. The trial court entered judgment for Russell and awarded damages in the amount of approximatel... | [
-0.016311176121234894,
-0.03696667030453682,
-0.013962970115244389,
0.003926774486899376,
0.06929000467061996,
0.017151877284049988,
0.04768574237823486,
-0.00006142524216556922,
0.007697485387325287,
-0.017994480207562447,
-0.00011142688890686259,
0.019001130014657974,
-0.051163144409656525... |
OPINION
BIVINS, Judge.
On September 12, 1983, three vicious dogs attacked Phillip Briggs while he walked to school on a public street in Corrales. At the time, the Village of Corrales had no designated animal control officer. Such duties were delegated to the police department, due to the retirement of the former anima... | [
-0.054184794425964355,
-0.04375405237078667,
-0.03547296300530434,
-0.013502738438546658,
0.0023176753893494606,
-0.00008338863699464127,
0.07812338322401047,
0.003526636166498065,
0.03420018404722214,
-0.006983546074479818,
-0.001691521261818707,
0.013956824317574501,
-0.04732147604227066,
... |
OPINION
GARCIA, Judge.
A criminal information was filed against defendant, charging him with two counts of causing great bodily injury while driving under the influence of intoxicating liquor, contrary to NMSA 1978, Section 66-8-101 (Cum.Supp.1985). A jury found defendant guilty of the offenses, and following entry of ... | [
-0.02543676272034645,
0.004647340625524521,
-0.024818191304802895,
0.004195186775177717,
0.06726142764091492,
-0.002932323608547449,
0.05154759809374809,
0.04201292246580124,
0.014481707476079464,
-0.04061245918273926,
0.025098972022533417,
0.07005634158849716,
-0.006724856328219175,
0.003... |
OPINION
RIORDAN, Justice.
Plaintiff Jennetta Schweitzer (Schweitzer) brought suit against defendant Charles Burch (Burch) seeking payment of a portion of Burch’s retirement benefits. After a hearing, the district court granted summary judgment awarding Schweitzer the requested payment. Burch appeals. We affirm in part ... | [
-0.017880741506814957,
-0.042155779898166656,
0.00611362187191844,
-0.0006170010892674327,
0.04419700428843498,
-0.012167497538030148,
0.009490106254816055,
0.015345744788646698,
0.03465200215578079,
-0.04455628618597984,
-0.0068992446176707745,
0.04923556372523308,
-0.02920617163181305,
0... |
OPINION
STOWERS, Justice.
Appellant, George W. Elliott, Jr. (Elliott) appeals from the district court’s affirmance of the suspension of Elliott’s real estate broker’s license by the New Mexico Real Estate Commission (Commission). We affirm.
Elliott’s contentions are that the Commission lacked jurisdiction over the part... | [
-0.048886433243751526,
-0.009027243591845036,
-0.035016100853681564,
0.029185254126787186,
0.03107634373009205,
0.013475736603140831,
0.0637063980102539,
0.05019644275307655,
0.04118997976183891,
-0.04572581127285957,
-0.004482058808207512,
0.050131265074014664,
-0.0565551333129406,
0.0461... |
OPINION
SUTIN, Judge.
Plaintiffs, as purchasers, sued defendants Marrujo, as sellers, for specific performance of a real estate contract which was in full force and effect; that plaintiffs deposit the balance of the purchase price plus interest with the court; and for punitive damages. Plaintiffs also sued defendants, ... | [
-0.0403943732380867,
-0.029798518866300583,
0.004720054566860199,
-0.009910938329994678,
0.05174635723233223,
0.008982663974165916,
0.037099845707416534,
0.03730158507823944,
0.0388084277510643,
-0.012453043833374977,
0.004703686572611332,
0.05218787491321564,
-0.051240868866443634,
0.0188... |
OPINION
OMAN, Justice.
This is a quiet title suit in which plaintiffs, Juan J. Garcia and Tillie R. Garcia, husband and wife, claimed title to 66.237 acres of land by virtue of a deed from defendant, Nazario Garcia, dated June 3, 1968. Defendants, Jose N. Garcia, Jr. and Consuelo S. Garcia, husband and wife, countercla... | [
-0.047893378883600235,
-0.02888306975364685,
-0.006458405405282974,
0.009996459819376469,
0.043709877878427505,
0.005660264287143946,
0.052194949239492416,
0.04154558479785919,
0.01435224711894989,
-0.027805713936686516,
0.005099303089082241,
0.0425763875246048,
-0.034176234155893326,
0.05... |
OPINION
MONTOYA, Justice.
Plaintiff Judith M. Michelson (appellee) filed an action for divorce from defendant Jack T. Michelson (appellant) on August 23, 1972. In addition to asking for a divorce, appellee sought custody and support for the children of the parties, division of the community property, alimony and attorn... | [
-0.04615706950426102,
-0.028333354741334915,
-0.007711222395300865,
0.022886330261826515,
0.050773121416568756,
0.032044947147369385,
0.032253120094537735,
0.020374512299895287,
-0.012476582080125809,
-0.032817527651786804,
0.0333452932536602,
0.08217199891805649,
-0.04610677435994148,
0.0... |
PER CURIAM:
Upon consideration of the motion for rehearing, the opinion heretofore filed is withdrawn and the following substituted therefor:
OPINION
STEPHENSON, Justice.
The appellees Speckners brought this civil suit in the District Court of Grant County to foreclose an equitable mortgage. Appellee Charles Wilson (Wi... | [
-0.008256709203124046,
-0.02618389204144478,
0.021194947883486748,
0.029638346284627914,
0.07716403156518936,
0.022273844107985497,
0.0450112484395504,
0.018311936408281326,
0.001325122662819922,
-0.03506873920559883,
-0.0037515151780098677,
0.04891934618353844,
-0.07232244312763214,
0.047... |
OPINION
LOPEZ, Judge.
Defendant was indicted for violations of the Controlled Substances Act. Count I alleged the distribution and sale of heroin contrary to § 54-11-20(B), N.M.S.A. 1953 (Vol. 8, pt. 2, Supp.1973). Count II alleged the distribution and sale of marijuana contrary to § 54 — 11-22(A) (1), N.M.S. A. 1953 (... | [
-0.021254677325487137,
-0.021847138181328773,
-0.06422173976898193,
-0.013067754916846752,
0.06648538261651993,
-0.016732143238186836,
0.05029613897204399,
0.012909493409097195,
0.01893397606909275,
-0.0356157161295414,
0.03694102168083191,
0.028551483526825905,
-0.051170215010643005,
0.03... |
OPINION
SUTIN, Judge.
Defendant was convicted and sentenced for receiving stolen property in violation of § 40A-16-11, N.M.S.A.1953 (2d Repl. Vol. 6). He appeals. We reverse.
Defendant attacks the validity of the search warrant and the denial of a speedy trial.
A. The search warrant is void because it contained no dire... | [
-0.062576524913311,
-0.030377987772226334,
-0.03329702466726303,
0.01873232051730156,
0.07450968027114868,
-0.010803663171827793,
0.06989689916372299,
0.0025908472016453743,
-0.012911547906696796,
-0.04409509152173996,
0.007447442971169949,
0.013719748705625534,
-0.0641016960144043,
0.0215... |
OPINION
MARTINEZ, Justice.
This case is before this Court pursuant to § 16-7-14(C) (2), N.M.S.A.1953 Comp. (Repl. Vol. 4, 1970) which authorizes the Court of Appeals to certify to the Supreme Court issues of substantial public interest which should be determined by the Supreme Court. The court of appeals considered tha... | [
-0.03592488542199135,
-0.04014957696199417,
-0.021312778815627098,
-0.004091656766831875,
0.047137923538684845,
-0.008553450927138329,
0.052169982343912125,
0.03316204994916916,
0.013013855554163456,
-0.02775702439248562,
0.03131978213787079,
0.03921031206846237,
-0.04547429084777832,
0.02... |
OPINION
WOOD, Chief Judge.
Defendant -appeals his conviction of two burglaries. See § 40A-16-3(B), N.M.S.A. 1953 (2d Repl.Vol. 6). The issues concern: (1) a statute of limitations instruction given and (2) a requested instruction, which was refused, which would have limited jury consideration to the dates charged in th... | [
-0.024448683485388756,
-0.008646328933537006,
-0.02451622486114502,
-0.0002308860857738182,
0.0639849379658699,
-0.0005824908148497343,
0.06455926597118378,
-0.0020545911975204945,
0.01965620554983616,
-0.029485665261745453,
0.030728353187441826,
0.05108517035841942,
-0.031720731407403946,
... |
Further ordered that the record in Court of Appeals Cause No. 1366, 86 N.M. 600, 526 P.2d 194 be and the same is hereby returned to the Clerk of the Court of Appeals. | [
-0.05320213735103607,
-0.011889174580574036,
0.007361455820500851,
-0.0035023880191147327,
0.05541844666004181,
0.029709989205002785,
0.02004169672727585,
0.008135258220136166,
-0.03150523453950882,
-0.04587826132774353,
0.049646154046058655,
0.0018260322976857424,
-0.013027814216911793,
0... |
OPINION
STEPHENSON, Justice.
In September, 1968, Gillihan was convicted by a jury on four separate counts of murder in the first degree. Each conviction specified that the death penalty be imposed. On appeal, this court issued a mandate on September 10, 1969, remanding for resentencing as provided in newly enacted stat... | [
-0.02982807345688343,
-0.0032625747844576836,
-0.03748322278261185,
-0.008871376514434814,
0.012148312292993069,
0.01618041843175888,
0.05551725998520851,
-0.00173364975489676,
-0.00794761162251234,
-0.027661576867103577,
0.018104614689946175,
0.006257158238440752,
-0.08780649304389954,
0.... |
Further ordered that the record in Court of Appeals Cause No. 1308, 86 N.M. 661, 526 P.2d 803 be and the same is hereby returned to the Clerk of the Court of Appeals. | [
-0.023501388728618622,
-0.03427807241678238,
-0.00752484705299139,
-0.008716238662600517,
0.03946354240179062,
0.035570964217185974,
0.020975133404135704,
0.01549459993839264,
-0.03110410086810589,
-0.0387728288769722,
0.04205751419067383,
-0.007424661889672279,
-0.021214978769421577,
0.01... |
OPINION
HENDLEY, Judge.
Defendants were tried de novo in district court on an appeal from a conviction in magistrate court for violation of § 40A-20-10. N.M.S.A.1953 (Repl.Vol.1972). See § 36-15-1 through § 36-15-4, N.M. S.A.1953 (Repl.Vol.1972); § 36-21-42, N.M. S.A.1953 (Repl.Vol.1972); Southern Union Gas Company v. ... | [
-0.028528865426778793,
-0.009081660769879818,
-0.05452921614050865,
0.005691386293619871,
0.0392172709107399,
0.006382611580193043,
0.03370808809995651,
0.05381281301379204,
-0.00696899276226759,
-0.03399227559566498,
-0.00484667019918561,
0.06562943011522293,
-0.05527929961681366,
0.06655... |
OPINION
SUTIN, Chief Judge.
{1} This appeal presents the question whether a Colorado conviction for driving while ability impaired (DWAI) can be used to enhance a defendant’s sentence for driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor or drugs (DWI) under NMSA 1978, § 66-8-102 (2005) (amended 2007). Defendant... | [
0.0016616358188912272,
0.022200796753168106,
-0.008727021515369415,
0.0008185161277651787,
0.0515291728079319,
-0.005810381844639778,
0.09484285861253738,
0.0046732500195503235,
0.00845914613455534,
-0.03961171954870224,
0.03628763556480408,
0.03290750831365585,
-0.05267693102359772,
0.033... |
OPINION
CASTILLO, Judge.
{1} On motion for rehearing, the opinion filed February 20, 2008, is withdrawn, and the following opinion is substituted. The motion for rehearing is otherwise denied.
{2} This case requires us to consider three questions related to a bond (bond) that was issued under NMSA 1978, § 66-4-7(A) (20... | [
0.02976401522755623,
-0.02105095237493515,
-0.010371461510658264,
0.04421595111489296,
0.08154746145009995,
-0.002589323790743947,
0.06110222265124321,
0.02687801606953144,
-0.01594419777393341,
-0.0335126668214798,
0.0017292023403570056,
0.06304210424423218,
-0.03215234726667404,
0.047532... |
OPINION
SUTIN, Chief Judge.
{1} The question in this appeal is whether a junior mortgagee who forecloses its mortgage, along with foreclosure of the senior mortgage, and obtains a deficiency judgment has a right to redeem under the New Mexico redemption statute, NMSA 1978, § 39-5-18(A) (1987) (amended 2007), that was a... | [
-0.026914117857813835,
-0.016367681324481964,
0.025113452225923538,
-0.00019677179807331413,
0.05518592521548271,
0.029061289504170418,
0.0326126329600811,
-0.001826331950724125,
-0.008228747174143791,
-0.007380071096122265,
-0.009903993457555771,
0.025320596992969513,
-0.036906108260154724,... |
OPINION
DANIELS, Justice.
{1} Defendant Martin Saiz was convicted of first-degree murder, first-degree kidnapping, and tampering with evidence in connection with the killing of Carolyn Rustvold, an occupational therapist at Montezuma Elementary School in Albuquerque. We address Defendant’s numerous claims of error and ... | [
-0.018439123407006264,
-0.010651474818587303,
-0.0032939338125288486,
0.029288744553923607,
0.06082175299525261,
-0.014411951415240765,
0.08403603732585907,
0.00867035798728466,
0.008932421915233135,
-0.014196311123669147,
0.0029565466102212667,
0.030088255181908607,
-0.045578040182590485,
... |
OPINION
CASTILLO, Judge.
{1} Plaintiffs Marvin J. and Martha J. Weise (Plaintiffs) appeal from the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Defendant Washington Tru Solutions, LLC (WTS). Our resolution of this case requires us to evaluate whether Plaintiffs’ claims are preempted by the National Labo... | [
-0.014078861102461815,
-0.017086297273635864,
-0.017003854736685753,
0.008316397666931152,
0.04832937940955162,
0.015254081226885319,
0.049539223313331604,
0.02720825932919979,
-0.01605064980685711,
-0.043521199375391006,
-0.0037573734298348427,
0.047926317900419235,
-0.028102723881602287,
... |
OPINION
ROBINSON, Judge.
{1} This case comes before us on appeal from a partial final order pursuant to a divorce between Angelina Garcia and Matthew Gutierrez. Gutierrez, who is a member of the Pueblo of Pojoaque, argued that the district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over the issues raised in the petition ... | [
-0.04688159376382828,
-0.031418293714523315,
-0.023667093366384506,
0.015494830906391144,
0.023913197219371796,
0.007273556664586067,
0.05577865615487099,
0.03879242762923241,
-0.017867447808384895,
-0.031476009637117386,
0.0012092486722394824,
0.03329833224415779,
-0.0698375254869461,
0.0... |
OPINION
FRY, Judge.
{1} Plaintiff sued Defendants City of Albuquerque (the City) and Correctional Medical Services, Inc. (CMS) for the conduct of their employees at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC), which, according to Plaintiff, resulted in the death of her son (Decedent). Decedent was an inmate at MDC experien... | [
-0.042545072734355927,
-0.021416783332824707,
-0.046465255320072174,
0.022180113941431046,
0.07551396638154984,
-0.008540011942386627,
0.04784755781292915,
0.049104105681180954,
0.02629263512790203,
-0.03266242519021034,
0.003958004526793957,
0.011508902534842491,
-0.06782323122024536,
0.0... |
OPINION
PICKARD, Judge.
{1} Dana Howse (Howse) appeals the district court’s dismissals of her claim against her union, Communication Workers of Amer ica, AFL-CIO (CWA), for breach of its duty to represent her fairly in a pay scale grievance she wished to file against her employer, the Roswell Independent School Distric... | [
-0.013161441311240196,
-0.0047816005535423756,
-0.01817547343671322,
-0.012372075580060482,
0.028379574418067932,
-0.008963871747255325,
0.06340616941452026,
0.042303405702114105,
0.002203941810876131,
-0.05069287493824959,
0.011493935249745846,
0.036267947405576706,
-0.036856040358543396,
... |
OPINION
PICKARD, Judge.
This divorce case involves an appeal by Husband and a cross-appeal by Wife. Husband argues that Wife should not have been awarded a lien for a portion of the increased value of his separate property. Wife argues that she should have been awarded prejudgment interest on the community lien for the... | [
-0.02652966044843197,
-0.03560101240873337,
-0.022915825247764587,
0.017189843580126762,
0.04935409873723984,
0.039377156645059586,
0.03214709833264351,
0.03877464309334755,
0.02022329904139042,
-0.02959052473306656,
0.01460260059684515,
0.0482548251748085,
-0.06014775484800339,
0.03153296... |
OPINION
BLACK, Judge.
Defendant appeals her convictions for possession of and conspiracy to possess marijuana. Defendant raises several arguments on appeal concerning whether the trial court erred in failing to suppress evidence discovered when police officers stopped the truck in which she was riding. Defendant claims... | [
-0.01532992348074913,
-0.005198168568313122,
-0.020077496767044067,
0.026418842375278473,
0.06269840896129608,
-0.02024891972541809,
0.0374235063791275,
0.030381543561816216,
-0.015006407164037228,
-0.019200624898076057,
0.018160685896873474,
0.05528014525771141,
-0.028450939804315567,
0.0... |
OPINION
APODACA, Chief Judge.
Defendant appeals his convictions and sentences on four counts of criminal sexual penetration of a minor (CSPM) and five counts of criminal sexual contact of a minor (CSCM). He contends that the trial court erred: (1) in allowing the videotaped deposition testimony of the victims to be use... | [
0.0231642946600914,
-0.028322581201791763,
-0.027667177841067314,
0.02491428703069687,
0.07962583005428314,
0.00966991763561964,
0.04911203682422638,
0.012724506668746471,
-0.019190536811947823,
-0.028159981593489647,
0.060058027505874634,
0.02410084567964077,
-0.009229157119989395,
0.0467... |
OPINION
PICKARD, Judge.
Claimant appeals from the workers’ compensation judge’s order dismissing her claim. The sole issue presented on appeal is whether Claimant was a “worker” at the time of her injury for purposes of the New Mexico Workers’ Compensation Act, NMSA 1978, Sections 52-1-1 to 52-1-70 (Repl.Pamp.1991 & Cu... | [
-0.009091456420719624,
-0.015161601826548576,
-0.034093473106622696,
-0.02980000525712967,
0.06231194734573364,
0.01832452230155468,
0.06793323904275894,
0.03496711701154709,
-0.007263678126037121,
-0.04257626459002495,
-0.022228989750146866,
0.011024120263755322,
-0.04358529672026634,
0.0... |
OPINION
APODACA, Judge.
On the court’s own motion, the opinion filed on December 12,1994 is withdrawn and the following opinion is substituted in its place.
Chrysler Motor Company (Chrysler) appeals from a judgment awarding Jack Key and Jack Key Motor Company (Key) $300,-000 in damages under the New Mexico Motor Vehicl... | [
-0.03751896321773529,
0.008317246101796627,
-0.01566128246486187,
0.0240602008998394,
0.04843362793326378,
0.027364596724510193,
0.04884789511561394,
0.007543225772678852,
0.02942250669002533,
-0.034671470522880554,
-0.00473810825496912,
0.02115602232515812,
-0.018606480211019516,
0.047345... |
OPINION
BIVINS, Judge.
Plaintiffs’ amended complaint alleges that their land and improvements were damaged by flooding of the Brazos River in May, 1973. Plaintiffs claim that defendants, involved in gravel pit operation on adjacent property, negligently weakened the north bank of the river causing it to break its banks... | [
-0.016672151163220406,
-0.04186815395951271,
-0.03195400536060333,
0.007750885095447302,
0.06876442581415176,
0.009902081452310085,
0.02185676619410515,
0.035051438957452774,
0.0038877183105796576,
-0.046961262822151184,
0.01605980470776558,
0.05240877345204353,
-0.04657251760363579,
0.029... |
ORDER
This matter having come before the Court upon the State’s motions to hold briefing in abeyance pending resolution of a possible conflict of interest by appellants’ counsel in the above-entitled cases, and in accordance with this Court’s oral ruling announced at the hearing on the State’s motions on March 14, 1994... | [
-0.04800855740904808,
-0.040247008204460144,
-0.05322439968585968,
0.008616755716502666,
0.031774770468473434,
0.017883175984025,
0.01032731868326664,
-0.013565583154559135,
-0.005393130239099264,
-0.04226653277873993,
-0.015780717134475708,
0.05395583063364029,
-0.059945251792669296,
0.05... |
OPINION
WECHSLER, Judge.
Worker appeals from the order of the Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) determining that Employer and its Insurer (Insurer), through their agent Crawford & Company, Health and Rehabilitation (Crawford), may have ex parte contact with Worker’s physicians outside the presence of Worker’s counsel. ... | [
0.023467283695936203,
-0.017314018681645393,
-0.026563910767436028,
-0.028923222795128822,
0.03400034084916115,
0.015161784365773201,
0.04755799472332001,
0.018837107345461845,
-0.007207737769931555,
-0.0641518235206604,
0.01141687948256731,
0.04655230790376663,
-0.03487700968980789,
0.041... |
OPINION
DONNELLY, Judge.
The City of Rio Rancho (the City) appeals from an order of the district court dismissing Defendant’s conviction of driving while intoxicated, contrary to a municipal ordinance. The central issue presented on appeal is whether the City, a home rule municipality, may enforce its traffic code for ... | [
-0.014059784822165966,
-0.007452877704054117,
0.003301116870716214,
0.038973141461610794,
0.04963035136461258,
-0.022326676174998283,
0.049965228885412216,
0.011305950582027435,
0.01147520076483488,
-0.020146965980529785,
0.004035057965666056,
0.0605769120156765,
-0.0273455660790205,
0.061... |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.