kvn420/Tenro_V4.1
Any-to-Any • Updated • 6
Dataset Preview
The full dataset viewer is not available (click to read why). Only showing a preview of the rows.
The dataset generation failed
Error code: DatasetGenerationError
Exception: TypeError
Message: Couldn't cast array of type
struct<CreationDate: string, Creator: string, ModDate: string, Producer: string, Title: string, Author: string, CaseNumber: string, Chamber: string, Comments: string, Company: string, Disposition: string, OpinionXRef: string, PageBookmarkControl: string, PerCuriamExists: string, Source: string, SourceModified: string, Subject: string, Keywords: string, PerCuriamType: string>
to
{'CreationDate': Value(dtype='string', id=None), 'Creator': Value(dtype='string', id=None), 'ModDate': Value(dtype='string', id=None), 'Producer': Value(dtype='string', id=None), 'Title': Value(dtype='string', id=None), 'CaseNumber': Value(dtype='string', id=None), 'Chamber': Value(dtype='string', id=None), 'Comments': Value(dtype='string', id=None), 'Company': Value(dtype='string', id=None), 'Disposition': Value(dtype='string', id=None), 'Keywords': Value(dtype='string', id=None), 'OpinionXRef': Value(dtype='string', id=None), 'PageBookmarkControl': Value(dtype='string', id=None), 'PerCuriamExists': Value(dtype='string', id=None), 'Source': Value(dtype='string', id=None), 'SourceModified': Value(dtype='string', id=None), 'Subject': Value(dtype='string', id=None), 'Author': Value(dtype='string', id=None), 'SyllabusStatus': Value(dtype='string', id=None)}
Traceback: Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/src/services/worker/.venv/lib/python3.9/site-packages/datasets/builder.py", line 1869, in _prepare_split_single
writer.write_table(table)
File "/src/services/worker/.venv/lib/python3.9/site-packages/datasets/arrow_writer.py", line 580, in write_table
pa_table = table_cast(pa_table, self._schema)
File "/src/services/worker/.venv/lib/python3.9/site-packages/datasets/table.py", line 2292, in table_cast
return cast_table_to_schema(table, schema)
File "/src/services/worker/.venv/lib/python3.9/site-packages/datasets/table.py", line 2245, in cast_table_to_schema
arrays = [
File "/src/services/worker/.venv/lib/python3.9/site-packages/datasets/table.py", line 2246, in <listcomp>
cast_array_to_feature(
File "/src/services/worker/.venv/lib/python3.9/site-packages/datasets/table.py", line 1795, in wrapper
return pa.chunked_array([func(chunk, *args, **kwargs) for chunk in array.chunks])
File "/src/services/worker/.venv/lib/python3.9/site-packages/datasets/table.py", line 1795, in <listcomp>
return pa.chunked_array([func(chunk, *args, **kwargs) for chunk in array.chunks])
File "/src/services/worker/.venv/lib/python3.9/site-packages/datasets/table.py", line 2108, in cast_array_to_feature
raise TypeError(f"Couldn't cast array of type\n{_short_str(array.type)}\nto\n{_short_str(feature)}")
TypeError: Couldn't cast array of type
struct<CreationDate: string, Creator: string, ModDate: string, Producer: string, Title: string, Author: string, CaseNumber: string, Chamber: string, Comments: string, Company: string, Disposition: string, OpinionXRef: string, PageBookmarkControl: string, PerCuriamExists: string, Source: string, SourceModified: string, Subject: string, Keywords: string, PerCuriamType: string>
to
{'CreationDate': Value(dtype='string', id=None), 'Creator': Value(dtype='string', id=None), 'ModDate': Value(dtype='string', id=None), 'Producer': Value(dtype='string', id=None), 'Title': Value(dtype='string', id=None), 'CaseNumber': Value(dtype='string', id=None), 'Chamber': Value(dtype='string', id=None), 'Comments': Value(dtype='string', id=None), 'Company': Value(dtype='string', id=None), 'Disposition': Value(dtype='string', id=None), 'Keywords': Value(dtype='string', id=None), 'OpinionXRef': Value(dtype='string', id=None), 'PageBookmarkControl': Value(dtype='string', id=None), 'PerCuriamExists': Value(dtype='string', id=None), 'Source': Value(dtype='string', id=None), 'SourceModified': Value(dtype='string', id=None), 'Subject': Value(dtype='string', id=None), 'Author': Value(dtype='string', id=None), 'SyllabusStatus': Value(dtype='string', id=None)}
The above exception was the direct cause of the following exception:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/src/services/worker/src/worker/job_runners/config/parquet_and_info.py", line 1392, in compute_config_parquet_and_info_response
parquet_operations = convert_to_parquet(builder)
File "/src/services/worker/src/worker/job_runners/config/parquet_and_info.py", line 1041, in convert_to_parquet
builder.download_and_prepare(
File "/src/services/worker/.venv/lib/python3.9/site-packages/datasets/builder.py", line 924, in download_and_prepare
self._download_and_prepare(
File "/src/services/worker/.venv/lib/python3.9/site-packages/datasets/builder.py", line 999, in _download_and_prepare
self._prepare_split(split_generator, **prepare_split_kwargs)
File "/src/services/worker/.venv/lib/python3.9/site-packages/datasets/builder.py", line 1740, in _prepare_split
for job_id, done, content in self._prepare_split_single(
File "/src/services/worker/.venv/lib/python3.9/site-packages/datasets/builder.py", line 1896, in _prepare_split_single
raise DatasetGenerationError("An error occurred while generating the dataset") from e
datasets.exceptions.DatasetGenerationError: An error occurred while generating the datasetNeed help to make the dataset viewer work? Make sure to review how to configure the dataset viewer, and open a discussion for direct support.
pid string | docid string | content string | metadata dict | error sequence | page_number int64 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
null | ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/21...-843_7j80.pdf | null | {
"CreationDate": null,
"Creator": null,
"ModDate": null,
"Producer": null,
"Title": null,
"Author": null,
"CaseNumber": null,
"Company": null,
"Source": null,
"SourceModified": null,
"SyllabusStatus": null,
"Chamber": null,
"Comments": null,
"Disposition": null,
"Keywords": null,
"Opini... | [
"Error processing ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/21...-843_7j80.pdf: No /Root object! - Is this really a PDF?"
] | null |
null | ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/19...ifl.pdf | null | {
"CreationDate": null,
"Creator": null,
"ModDate": null,
"Producer": null,
"Title": null,
"Author": null,
"CaseNumber": null,
"Company": null,
"Source": null,
"SourceModified": null,
"SyllabusStatus": null,
"Chamber": null,
"Comments": null,
"Disposition": null,
"Keywords": null,
"Opini... | [
"Error processing ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/19...ifl.pdf: No /Root object! - Is this really a PDF?"
] | null |
0 | ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/21pdf/21-954_7l48.pdf | (Slip Opinion)
OCTOBER TERM, 2021
1
Syllabus
NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is
being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued.
The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been
... | {
"CreationDate": "b\"D:20220629101941-04'00'\"",
"Creator": "b'PScript5.dll Version 5.2.2'",
"ModDate": "b\"D:20220629103107-04'00'\"",
"Producer": "b'Acrobat Distiller 21.0 (Windows)'",
"Title": "b'21-954 Biden v. Texas (06/30/2022)'",
"Author": null,
"CaseNumber": null,
"Company": null,
"Source": n... | null | 1 |
2 | ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/21pdf/21-954_7l48.pdf | 2
BIDEN v. TEXAS
Syllabus
The District Court vacated the June 1 Memorandum and remanded to
DHS. It also imposed a nationwide injunction ordering the Govern-
ment to “enforce and implement MPP in good faith until such a time
as it has been lawfully rescinded in compliance with the APA and until
such a ... | {
"CreationDate": "b\"D:20220629101941-04'00'\"",
"Creator": "b'PScript5.dll Version 5.2.2'",
"ModDate": "b\"D:20220629103107-04'00'\"",
"Producer": "b'Acrobat Distiller 21.0 (Windows)'",
"Title": "b'21-954 Biden v. Texas (06/30/2022)'",
"Author": null,
"CaseNumber": null,
"Company": null,
"Source": n... | null | 2 |
4 | ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/21pdf/21-954_7l48.pdf | Cite as: 597 U. S. ____ (2022)
3
Syllabus
Statutory structure likewise confirms this conclusion. Elsewhere in
section 1252, where Congress intended to deny subject matter jurisdic-
tion over a particular class of claims, it did so unambiguously. See,
e.g., §1252(a)(2) (entitled “Matters no... | {
"CreationDate": "b\"D:20220629101941-04'00'\"",
"Creator": "b'PScript5.dll Version 5.2.2'",
"ModDate": "b\"D:20220629103107-04'00'\"",
"Producer": "b'Acrobat Distiller 21.0 (Windows)'",
"Title": "b'21-954 Biden v. Texas (06/30/2022)'",
"Author": null,
"CaseNumber": null,
"Company": null,
"Source": n... | null | 3 |
6 | ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/21pdf/21-954_7l48.pdf | 4
BIDEN v. TEXAS
Syllabus
alternative means of processing applicants for admission, see 8
U. S. C. §1182(d)(5)(A), additionally makes clear that the Court of Ap-
peals erred in holding that the INA required the Government to con-
tinue implementing MPP. Pp. 13–18.
(c) The Court of Appeals also erred i... | {
"CreationDate": "b\"D:20220629101941-04'00'\"",
"Creator": "b'PScript5.dll Version 5.2.2'",
"ModDate": "b\"D:20220629103107-04'00'\"",
"Producer": "b'Acrobat Distiller 21.0 (Windows)'",
"Title": "b'21-954 Biden v. Texas (06/30/2022)'",
"Author": null,
"CaseNumber": null,
"Company": null,
"Source": n... | null | 4 |
8 | ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/21pdf/21-954_7l48.pdf | Cite as: 597 U. S. ____ (2022)
5
Syllabus
judgment against its original action. Pp. 18–25.
20 F. 4th 928, reversed and remanded.
ROBERTS, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which BREYER,
SOTOMAYOR, KAGAN, and KAVANAUGH, JJ., joined. KAVANAUGH, J., filed
a concurring opinion. ALITO, J., fi... | {
"CreationDate": "b\"D:20220629101941-04'00'\"",
"Creator": "b'PScript5.dll Version 5.2.2'",
"ModDate": "b\"D:20220629103107-04'00'\"",
"Producer": "b'Acrobat Distiller 21.0 (Windows)'",
"Title": "b'21-954 Biden v. Texas (06/30/2022)'",
"Author": null,
"CaseNumber": null,
"Company": null,
"Source": n... | null | 5 |
9 | ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/21pdf/21-954_7l48.pdf | Cite as: 597 U. S. ____ (2022)
1
Opinion of the Court
NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the
preliminary print of the United States Reports. Readers are requested to
notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Wash-
ington, D. C. 20543,... | {
"CreationDate": "b\"D:20220629101941-04'00'\"",
"Creator": "b'PScript5.dll Version 5.2.2'",
"ModDate": "b\"D:20220629103107-04'00'\"",
"Producer": "b'Acrobat Distiller 21.0 (Windows)'",
"Title": "b'21-954 Biden v. Texas (06/30/2022)'",
"Author": null,
"CaseNumber": null,
"Company": null,
"Source": n... | null | 6 |
10 | ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/21pdf/21-954_7l48.pdf | 2
BIDEN v. TEXAS
Opinion of the Court
action under the Administrative Procedure Act.
The questions presented are whether the Government’s
rescission of the Migrant Protection Protocols violated the
Immigration and Nationality Act and whether the Govern-
ment’s second termination of the policy was a val... | {
"CreationDate": "b\"D:20220629101941-04'00'\"",
"Creator": "b'PScript5.dll Version 5.2.2'",
"ModDate": "b\"D:20220629103107-04'00'\"",
"Producer": "b'Acrobat Distiller 21.0 (Windows)'",
"Title": "b'21-954 Biden v. Texas (06/30/2022)'",
"Author": null,
"CaseNumber": null,
"Company": null,
"Source": n... | null | 7 |
12 | ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/21pdf/21-954_7l48.pdf | Cite as: 597 U. S. ____ (2022)
3
Opinion of the Court
agency had “primarily used [§1225(b)(2)(C)] on an ad-hoc
basis to return certain Mexican and Canadian nationals”
arriving at ports of entry. App. to Pet. for Cert. 273a, n. 12.
A separate provision of the same section of the INA states
that ... | {
"CreationDate": "b\"D:20220629101941-04'00'\"",
"Creator": "b'PScript5.dll Version 5.2.2'",
"ModDate": "b\"D:20220629103107-04'00'\"",
"Producer": "b'Acrobat Distiller 21.0 (Windows)'",
"Title": "b'21-954 Biden v. Texas (06/30/2022)'",
"Author": null,
"CaseNumber": null,
"Company": null,
"Source": n... | null | 8 |
14 | ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/21pdf/21-954_7l48.pdf | 4
BIDEN v. TEXAS
Opinion of the Court
to terminate or modify the [MPP] program.” 86 Fed. Reg.
8269 (2021).
On June 1, 2021, Secretary Mayorkas issued a memoran-
dum officially terminating MPP (the June 1 Memorandum).
In that memorandum, the Secretary noted his determina-
tion “that MPP [d]oes not adequatel... | {
"CreationDate": "b\"D:20220629101941-04'00'\"",
"Creator": "b'PScript5.dll Version 5.2.2'",
"ModDate": "b\"D:20220629103107-04'00'\"",
"Producer": "b'Acrobat Distiller 21.0 (Windows)'",
"Title": "b'21-954 Biden v. Texas (06/30/2022)'",
"Author": null,
"CaseNumber": null,
"Company": null,
"Source": n... | null | 9 |
16 | ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/21pdf/21-954_7l48.pdf | Cite as: 597 U. S. ____ (2022)
5
Opinion of the Court
entered judgment for respondents. The court first con-
cluded that terminating MPP would violate the INA. It rea-
soned that section 1225 of the INA “provides the govern-
ment two options”: mandatory detention pursuant to
section 1225... | {
"CreationDate": "b\"D:20220629101941-04'00'\"",
"Creator": "b'PScript5.dll Version 5.2.2'",
"ModDate": "b\"D:20220629103107-04'00'\"",
"Producer": "b'Acrobat Distiller 21.0 (Windows)'",
"Title": "b'21-954 Biden v. Texas (06/30/2022)'",
"Author": null,
"CaseNumber": null,
"Company": null,
"Source": n... | null | 10 |
18 | ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/21pdf/21-954_7l48.pdf | 6
BIDEN v. TEXAS
Opinion of the Court
While the Government’s appeal was pending, however, Sec-
retary Mayorkas “considered anew whether to maintain,
terminate, or modify MPP in various ways.” App. to Pet.
for Cert. 286a. On September 29, 2021, the Secretary pub-
licly announced his “inten[tion] to i... | {
"CreationDate": "b\"D:20220629101941-04'00'\"",
"Creator": "b'PScript5.dll Version 5.2.2'",
"ModDate": "b\"D:20220629103107-04'00'\"",
"Producer": "b'Acrobat Distiller 21.0 (Windows)'",
"Title": "b'21-954 Biden v. Texas (06/30/2022)'",
"Author": null,
"CaseNumber": null,
"Company": null,
"Source": n... | null | 11 |
20 | ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/21pdf/21-954_7l48.pdf | Cite as: 597 U. S. ____ (2022)
7
Opinion of the Court
in diplomatic engagements with Mexico, diverting atten-
tion from more productive efforts to fight transnational
criminal and smuggling networks and address the root
causes of migration.” Id., at 262a.
In light of those conclusions... | {
"CreationDate": "b\"D:20220629101941-04'00'\"",
"Creator": "b'PScript5.dll Version 5.2.2'",
"ModDate": "b\"D:20220629103107-04'00'\"",
"Producer": "b'Acrobat Distiller 21.0 (Windows)'",
"Title": "b'21-954 Biden v. Texas (06/30/2022)'",
"Author": null,
"CaseNumber": null,
"Company": null,
"Source": n... | null | 12 |
22 | ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/21pdf/21-954_7l48.pdf | 8
BIDEN v. TEXAS
Opinion of the Court
to put the Termination Decision back on the chopping block
and rethink things,” and for ultimately “just further de-
fend[ing] what it had previously decided.” Id., at 955. And
the Court of Appeals drew a dichotomy between taking new
agency action and appealing a... | {
"CreationDate": "b\"D:20220629101941-04'00'\"",
"Creator": "b'PScript5.dll Version 5.2.2'",
"ModDate": "b\"D:20220629103107-04'00'\"",
"Producer": "b'Acrobat Distiller 21.0 (Windows)'",
"Title": "b'21-954 Biden v. Texas (06/30/2022)'",
"Author": null,
"CaseNumber": null,
"Company": null,
"Source": n... | null | 13 |
24 | ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/21pdf/21-954_7l48.pdf | Cite as: 597 U. S. ____ (2022)
9
Opinion of the Court
(“Every federal appellate court has an obligation to satisfy
itself not only of its own jurisdiction, but also that of the
lower courts in a cause under review, even though the par-
ties are prepared to concede it.” (internal quotation marks
and a... | {
"CreationDate": "b\"D:20220629101941-04'00'\"",
"Creator": "b'PScript5.dll Version 5.2.2'",
"ModDate": "b\"D:20220629103107-04'00'\"",
"Producer": "b'Acrobat Distiller 21.0 (Windows)'",
"Title": "b'21-954 Biden v. Texas (06/30/2022)'",
"Author": null,
"CaseNumber": null,
"Company": null,
"Source": n... | null | 14 |
26 | ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/21pdf/21-954_7l48.pdf | 10
BIDEN v. TEXAS
Opinion of the Court
A second feature of the text of section 1252(f )(1) leaves
no doubt that this Court has jurisdiction: the parenthetical
explicitly preserving this Court’s power to enter injunctive
relief. See §1252(f )(1) (“[N]o court (other than the Supreme
Court) shall have jurisdictio... | {
"CreationDate": "b\"D:20220629101941-04'00'\"",
"Creator": "b'PScript5.dll Version 5.2.2'",
"ModDate": "b\"D:20220629103107-04'00'\"",
"Producer": "b'Acrobat Distiller 21.0 (Windows)'",
"Title": "b'21-954 Biden v. Texas (06/30/2022)'",
"Author": null,
"CaseNumber": null,
"Company": null,
"Source": n... | null | 15 |
28 | ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/21pdf/21-954_7l48.pdf | Cite as: 597 U. S. ____ (2022)
11
Opinion of the Court
action taken pursuant to sections 1221 through 1232. Or it
could have worded section 1252(f )(1) similarly to the imme-
diately adjacent section 1252(g), which provides that “no
court shall have jurisdiction to hear any cause or claim by
or on beha... | {
"CreationDate": "b\"D:20220629101941-04'00'\"",
"Creator": "b'PScript5.dll Version 5.2.2'",
"ModDate": "b\"D:20220629103107-04'00'\"",
"Producer": "b'Acrobat Distiller 21.0 (Windows)'",
"Title": "b'21-954 Biden v. Texas (06/30/2022)'",
"Author": null,
"CaseNumber": null,
"Company": null,
"Source": n... | null | 16 |
30 | ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/21pdf/21-954_7l48.pdf | 12
BIDEN v. TEXAS
Opinion of the Court
Court regarding section 1252(f )(1) are in accord. See Reno
v. American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Comm., 525 U. S.
471, 481 (1999) (“By its plain terms, and even by its title,
[section 1252(f )(1)] is nothing more or less than a limit on
injunctive relief.”).
In sho... | {
"CreationDate": "b\"D:20220629101941-04'00'\"",
"Creator": "b'PScript5.dll Version 5.2.2'",
"ModDate": "b\"D:20220629103107-04'00'\"",
"Producer": "b'Acrobat Distiller 21.0 (Windows)'",
"Title": "b'21-954 Biden v. Texas (06/30/2022)'",
"Author": null,
"CaseNumber": null,
"Company": null,
"Source": n... | null | 17 |
32 | ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/21pdf/21-954_7l48.pdf | Cite as: 597 U. S. ____ (2022)
13
Opinion of the Court
the [Secretary] may return the alien to that territory pend-
ing a proceeding under section 1229a.” Section 1225(b)(2)(C)
plainly confers a discretionary authority to return aliens to
Mexico during the pendency of their immigration proceed-
ings. This Co... | {
"CreationDate": "b\"D:20220629101941-04'00'\"",
"Creator": "b'PScript5.dll Version 5.2.2'",
"ModDate": "b\"D:20220629103107-04'00'\"",
"Producer": "b'Acrobat Distiller 21.0 (Windows)'",
"Title": "b'21-954 Biden v. Texas (06/30/2022)'",
"Author": null,
"CaseNumber": null,
"Company": null,
"Source": n... | null | 18 |
34 | ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/21pdf/21-954_7l48.pdf | 14
BIDEN v. TEXAS
Opinion of the Court
‘shall.’ ”). Congress’s use of the word “may” is therefore in-
consistent with respondents’ proposed inference from the
statutory structure. If Congress had intended section
1225(b)(2)(C) to operate as a mandatory cure of any non-
compliance with the... | {
"CreationDate": "b\"D:20220629101941-04'00'\"",
"Creator": "b'PScript5.dll Version 5.2.2'",
"ModDate": "b\"D:20220629103107-04'00'\"",
"Producer": "b'Acrobat Distiller 21.0 (Windows)'",
"Title": "b'21-954 Biden v. Texas (06/30/2022)'",
"Author": null,
"CaseNumber": null,
"Company": null,
"Source": n... | null | 19 |
36 | ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/21pdf/21-954_7l48.pdf | Cite as: 597 U. S. ____ (2022)
15
Opinion of the Court
detained’ means ‘shall be detained,’ ” post, at 9, and criti-
cizes the Government’s “argument that ‘shall’ means
‘may,’ ” post, at 10. But the theory works both ways. Con-
gress conferred contiguous-territory return authority in ex-
pressl... | {
"CreationDate": "b\"D:20220629101941-04'00'\"",
"Creator": "b'PScript5.dll Version 5.2.2'",
"ModDate": "b\"D:20220629103107-04'00'\"",
"Producer": "b'Acrobat Distiller 21.0 (Windows)'",
"Title": "b'21-954 Biden v. Texas (06/30/2022)'",
"Author": null,
"CaseNumber": null,
"Company": null,
"Source": n... | null | 20 |
38 | ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/21pdf/21-954_7l48.pdf | 16
BIDEN v. TEXAS
Opinion of the Court
entry to await their exclusion proceedings in Canada or
Mexico. The BIA noted the lack of “any evidence that this
is a practice known to Congress” and “the absence of a sup-
porting regulation.” In re Sanchez-Avila, 21 I. & N. Dec.
444, 465 (1996) (en ... | {
"CreationDate": "b\"D:20220629101941-04'00'\"",
"Creator": "b'PScript5.dll Version 5.2.2'",
"ModDate": "b\"D:20220629103107-04'00'\"",
"Producer": "b'Acrobat Distiller 21.0 (Windows)'",
"Title": "b'21-954 Biden v. Texas (06/30/2022)'",
"Author": null,
"CaseNumber": null,
"Company": null,
"Source": n... | null | 21 |
40 | ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/21pdf/21-954_7l48.pdf | Cite as: 597 U. S. ____ (2022)
17
Opinion of the Court
declined to “run interference in [the] delicate field of inter-
national relations” without “the affirmative intention of the
Congress clearly expressed.” Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petro-
leum Co., 569 U. S. 108, 115–116 (2013). That is no less
tr... | {
"CreationDate": "b\"D:20220629101941-04'00'\"",
"Creator": "b'PScript5.dll Version 5.2.2'",
"ModDate": "b\"D:20220629103107-04'00'\"",
"Producer": "b'Acrobat Distiller 21.0 (Windows)'",
"Title": "b'21-954 Biden v. Texas (06/30/2022)'",
"Author": null,
"CaseNumber": null,
"Company": null,
"Source": n... | null | 22 |
42 | ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/21pdf/21-954_7l48.pdf | 18
BIDEN v. TEXAS
Opinion of the Court
authority to some extent. Importantly, the authority is not
unbounded: DHS may exercise its discretion to parole ap-
plicants “only on a case-by-case basis for urgent humanitar-
ian reasons or significant public benefit.” Ibid. And under
the APA, DHS’s exercise of discr... | {
"CreationDate": "b\"D:20220629101941-04'00'\"",
"Creator": "b'PScript5.dll Version 5.2.2'",
"ModDate": "b\"D:20220629103107-04'00'\"",
"Producer": "b'Acrobat Distiller 21.0 (Windows)'",
"Title": "b'21-954 Biden v. Texas (06/30/2022)'",
"Author": null,
"CaseNumber": null,
"Company": null,
"Source": n... | null | 23 |
44 | ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/21pdf/21-954_7l48.pdf | Cite as: 597 U. S. ____ (2022)
19
Opinion of the Court
matter] to DHS for further consideration.” 554 F. Supp. 3d,
at 857.
As we explained two Terms ago in Department of Home-
land Security v. Regents of Univ. of Cal., 591 U. S. ___
(2020), upon finding that the grounds for agency action are
inad... | {
"CreationDate": "b\"D:20220629101941-04'00'\"",
"Creator": "b'PScript5.dll Version 5.2.2'",
"ModDate": "b\"D:20220629103107-04'00'\"",
"Producer": "b'Acrobat Distiller 21.0 (Windows)'",
"Title": "b'21-954 Biden v. Texas (06/30/2022)'",
"Author": null,
"CaseNumber": null,
"Company": null,
"Source": n... | null | 24 |
46 | ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/21pdf/21-954_7l48.pdf | 20
BIDEN v. TEXAS
Opinion of the Court
was final agency action. That is, both the June 1 Memoran-
dum and the October 29 Memoranda, when they were is-
sued, “mark[ed] the ‘consummation’ of the agency’s deci-
sionmaking process” and resulted in “rights and obligations
[being] determined.” Benne... | {
"CreationDate": "b\"D:20220629101941-04'00'\"",
"Creator": "b'PScript5.dll Version 5.2.2'",
"ModDate": "b\"D:20220629103107-04'00'\"",
"Producer": "b'Acrobat Distiller 21.0 (Windows)'",
"Title": "b'21-954 Biden v. Texas (06/30/2022)'",
"Author": null,
"CaseNumber": null,
"Company": null,
"Source": n... | null | 25 |
48 | ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/21pdf/21-954_7l48.pdf | Cite as: 597 U. S. ____ (2022)
21
Opinion of the Court
U. S. C. §551(4); see 20 F. 4th, at 950–951 (“The States are
challenging the Termination Decision—not the June 1
Memorandum, the October 29 Memoranda, or any other
memo.”). To the extent that the Court of Appeals under-
stood itself ... | {
"CreationDate": "b\"D:20220629101941-04'00'\"",
"Creator": "b'PScript5.dll Version 5.2.2'",
"ModDate": "b\"D:20220629103107-04'00'\"",
"Producer": "b'Acrobat Distiller 21.0 (Windows)'",
"Title": "b'21-954 Biden v. Texas (06/30/2022)'",
"Author": null,
"CaseNumber": null,
"Company": null,
"Source": n... | null | 26 |
50 | ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/21pdf/21-954_7l48.pdf | 22
BIDEN v. TEXAS
Opinion of the Court
(slip op., at 14–15). And because the then-Secretary’s rea-
soning had “little relationship to that of her predecessor,”
the Court characterized the new explanations as “imper-
missible post hoc rationalizations . . . not properly before
us.” Id., at ___ (slip... | {
"CreationDate": "b\"D:20220629101941-04'00'\"",
"Creator": "b'PScript5.dll Version 5.2.2'",
"ModDate": "b\"D:20220629103107-04'00'\"",
"Producer": "b'Acrobat Distiller 21.0 (Windows)'",
"Title": "b'21-954 Biden v. Texas (06/30/2022)'",
"Author": null,
"CaseNumber": null,
"Company": null,
"Source": n... | null | 27 |
52 | ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/21pdf/21-954_7l48.pdf | Cite as: 597 U. S. ____ (2022)
23
Opinion of the Court
evaluating the agency’s contemporaneous explanation in
light of the existing administrative record.” Department of
Commerce, 588 U. S., at ___ (slip op., at 23). Department of
Commerce involved a “narrow exception to th[at] general
rule” th... | {
"CreationDate": "b\"D:20220629101941-04'00'\"",
"Creator": "b'PScript5.dll Version 5.2.2'",
"ModDate": "b\"D:20220629103107-04'00'\"",
"Producer": "b'Acrobat Distiller 21.0 (Windows)'",
"Title": "b'21-954 Biden v. Texas (06/30/2022)'",
"Author": null,
"CaseNumber": null,
"Company": null,
"Source": n... | null | 28 |
54 | ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/21pdf/21-954_7l48.pdf | 24
BIDEN v. TEXAS
Opinion of the Court
things”). But the agency’s ex ante preference for terminat-
ing MPP—like any other feature of an administration’s pol-
icy agenda—should not be held against the October 29
Memoranda. “It is hardly improper for an agency head to
come into office with policy prefere... | {
"CreationDate": "b\"D:20220629101941-04'00'\"",
"Creator": "b'PScript5.dll Version 5.2.2'",
"ModDate": "b\"D:20220629103107-04'00'\"",
"Producer": "b'Acrobat Distiller 21.0 (Windows)'",
"Title": "b'21-954 Biden v. Texas (06/30/2022)'",
"Author": null,
"CaseNumber": null,
"Company": null,
"Source": n... | null | 29 |
56 | ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/21pdf/21-954_7l48.pdf | Cite as: 597 U. S. ____ (2022)
25
Opinion of the Court
tion on remand is entitled to “reexamine[] the problem, re-
cast its rationale and reach[ ] the same result.” Chenery II,
332 U. S., at 196; see also Regents, 591 U. S., at ___
(KAVANAUGH, J., concurring in judgment in part and dis-
sent... | {
"CreationDate": "b\"D:20220629101941-04'00'\"",
"Creator": "b'PScript5.dll Version 5.2.2'",
"ModDate": "b\"D:20220629103107-04'00'\"",
"Producer": "b'Acrobat Distiller 21.0 (Windows)'",
"Title": "b'21-954 Biden v. Texas (06/30/2022)'",
"Author": null,
"CaseNumber": null,
"Company": null,
"Source": n... | null | 30 |
58 | ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/21pdf/21-954_7l48.pdf | Cite as: 597 U. S. ____ (2022)
1
KAVANAUGH, J., concurring
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
_________________
No. 21–954
_________________
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED
STATES, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. TEXAS, ET AL.
ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF
APPEALS FOR THE FI... | {
"CreationDate": "b\"D:20220629101941-04'00'\"",
"Creator": "b'PScript5.dll Version 5.2.2'",
"ModDate": "b\"D:20220629103107-04'00'\"",
"Producer": "b'Acrobat Distiller 21.0 (Windows)'",
"Title": "b'21-954 Biden v. Texas (06/30/2022)'",
"Author": null,
"CaseNumber": null,
"Company": null,
"Source": n... | null | 31 |
59 | ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/21pdf/21-954_7l48.pdf | 2
BIDEN v. TEXAS
KAVANAUGH, J., concurring
Option two: DHS may choose to return noncitizens to
Mexico. 8 U. S. C. §1225(b)(2)(C). Consistent with that
statutory authority, the prior Administration chose to re-
turn a relatively small group of noncitizens to Mexico.
In general, when ... | {
"CreationDate": "b\"D:20220629101941-04'00'\"",
"Creator": "b'PScript5.dll Version 5.2.2'",
"ModDate": "b\"D:20220629103107-04'00'\"",
"Producer": "b'Acrobat Distiller 21.0 (Windows)'",
"Title": "b'21-954 Biden v. Texas (06/30/2022)'",
"Author": null,
"CaseNumber": null,
"Company": null,
"Source": n... | null | 32 |
61 | ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/21pdf/21-954_7l48.pdf | Cite as: 597 U. S. ____ (2022)
3
KAVANAUGH, J., concurring
To be clear, when there is insufficient detention capacity
and the President chooses the parole option because he de-
termines that returning noncitizens to Mexico is not feasi-
ble for foreign-policy reasons, a court applying State Farm
must be deferen... | {
"CreationDate": "b\"D:20220629101941-04'00'\"",
"Creator": "b'PScript5.dll Version 5.2.2'",
"ModDate": "b\"D:20220629103107-04'00'\"",
"Producer": "b'Acrobat Distiller 21.0 (Windows)'",
"Title": "b'21-954 Biden v. Texas (06/30/2022)'",
"Author": null,
"CaseNumber": null,
"Company": null,
"Source": n... | null | 33 |
62 | ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/21pdf/21-954_7l48.pdf | Cite as: 597 U. S. ____ (2022)
1
ALITO, J., dissenting
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
_________________
No. 21–954
_________________
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED
STATES, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. TEXAS, ET AL.
ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF
APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH ... | {
"CreationDate": "b\"D:20220629101941-04'00'\"",
"Creator": "b'PScript5.dll Version 5.2.2'",
"ModDate": "b\"D:20220629103107-04'00'\"",
"Producer": "b'Acrobat Distiller 21.0 (Windows)'",
"Title": "b'21-954 Biden v. Texas (06/30/2022)'",
"Author": null,
"CaseNumber": null,
"Company": null,
"Source": n... | null | 34 |
64 | ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/21pdf/21-954_7l48.pdf | 2
BIDEN v. TEXAS
ALITO, J., dissenting
States,” the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) “may
return the alien to that territory pending a [removal] pro-
ceeding.” §1225(b)(2)(C). Second, DHS may release indi-
vidual aliens on “parole,” but “only on a case-by-case basis
for urgent humanitarian reasons ... | {
"CreationDate": "b\"D:20220629101941-04'00'\"",
"Creator": "b'PScript5.dll Version 5.2.2'",
"ModDate": "b\"D:20220629103107-04'00'\"",
"Producer": "b'Acrobat Distiller 21.0 (Windows)'",
"Title": "b'21-954 Biden v. Texas (06/30/2022)'",
"Author": null,
"CaseNumber": null,
"Company": null,
"Source": n... | null | 35 |
66 | ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/21pdf/21-954_7l48.pdf | Cite as: 597 U. S. ____ (2022)
3
ALITO, J., dissenting
existing detention facilities could not house all the people
who were attempting to enter unlawfully, many “illegal al-
iens with meritless asylum claims were being released into
the United States,” and many, once released, simply “ ‘dis-
appeared.’ ” Ibid... | {
"CreationDate": "b\"D:20220629101941-04'00'\"",
"Creator": "b'PScript5.dll Version 5.2.2'",
"ModDate": "b\"D:20220629103107-04'00'\"",
"Producer": "b'Acrobat Distiller 21.0 (Windows)'",
"Title": "b'21-954 Biden v. Texas (06/30/2022)'",
"Author": null,
"CaseNumber": null,
"Company": null,
"Source": n... | null | 36 |
68 | ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/21pdf/21-954_7l48.pdf | 4
BIDEN v. TEXAS
ALITO, J., dissenting
months,” rather than leaving asylum applicants “in limbo
for years.” Id., at 190.
Hours after his inauguration on January 20, 2021, Pres-
ident Biden issued an Executive Order suspending MPP,
and the effects on the border were immediate. According to
the Governm... | {
"CreationDate": "b\"D:20220629101941-04'00'\"",
"Creator": "b'PScript5.dll Version 5.2.2'",
"ModDate": "b\"D:20220629103107-04'00'\"",
"Producer": "b'Acrobat Distiller 21.0 (Windows)'",
"Title": "b'21-954 Biden v. Texas (06/30/2022)'",
"Author": null,
"CaseNumber": null,
"Company": null,
"Source": n... | null | 37 |
70 | ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/21pdf/21-954_7l48.pdf | Cite as: 597 U. S. ____ (2022)
5
ALITO, J., dissenting
issue a new memorandum terminating MPP, and the Gov-
ernment asked the Court of Appeals to hold its appeal in
abeyance pending this promised administrative action.
App. 51–52. The Court of Appeals denied that motion, id.,
at 54, and then... | {
"CreationDate": "b\"D:20220629101941-04'00'\"",
"Creator": "b'PScript5.dll Version 5.2.2'",
"ModDate": "b\"D:20220629103107-04'00'\"",
"Producer": "b'Acrobat Distiller 21.0 (Windows)'",
"Title": "b'21-954 Biden v. Texas (06/30/2022)'",
"Author": null,
"CaseNumber": null,
"Company": null,
"Source": n... | null | 38 |
72 | ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/21pdf/21-954_7l48.pdf | 6
BIDEN v. TEXAS
ALITO, J., dissenting
should have addressed in the briefs they filed before oral
argument. In its opening brief, the Government’s only dis-
cussion of this issue appeared in a footnote that reads as
follows in its entirety:
“In addition, the lower courts lacked juris... | {
"CreationDate": "b\"D:20220629101941-04'00'\"",
"Creator": "b'PScript5.dll Version 5.2.2'",
"ModDate": "b\"D:20220629103107-04'00'\"",
"Producer": "b'Acrobat Distiller 21.0 (Windows)'",
"Title": "b'21-954 Biden v. Texas (06/30/2022)'",
"Author": null,
"CaseNumber": null,
"Company": null,
"Source": n... | null | 39 |
74 | ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/21pdf/21-954_7l48.pdf | Cite as: 597 U. S. ____ (2022)
7
ALITO, J., dissenting
Tr. of Oral Arg. 13–14. But none of the papers filed by the
Government in this case or in Gonzalez said one word about
APA review. Nor did the respondents’ brief. Indeed, their
brief did not discuss jurisdiction at all.
Faced with this situation, t... | {
"CreationDate": "b\"D:20220629101941-04'00'\"",
"Creator": "b'PScript5.dll Version 5.2.2'",
"ModDate": "b\"D:20220629103107-04'00'\"",
"Producer": "b'Acrobat Distiller 21.0 (Windows)'",
"Title": "b'21-954 Biden v. Texas (06/30/2022)'",
"Author": null,
"CaseNumber": null,
"Company": null,
"Source": n... | null | 40 |
75 | ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/21pdf/21-954_7l48.pdf | 8
BIDEN v. TEXAS
ALITO, J., dissenting
case, but its analysis of the merits is seriously flawed. First,
the majority errs in holding that the INA does not really
mean what it says when it commands that the aliens in
question “shall” be detained pending removal or asylum
proceedings ... | {
"CreationDate": "b\"D:20220629101941-04'00'\"",
"Creator": "b'PScript5.dll Version 5.2.2'",
"ModDate": "b\"D:20220629103107-04'00'\"",
"Producer": "b'Acrobat Distiller 21.0 (Windows)'",
"Title": "b'21-954 Biden v. Texas (06/30/2022)'",
"Author": null,
"CaseNumber": null,
"Company": null,
"Source": n... | null | 41 |
77 | ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/21pdf/21-954_7l48.pdf | Cite as: 597 U. S. ____ (2022)
9
ALITO, J., dissenting
shall be detained for a [removal] proceeding.” (Emphasis
added.) Six years ago, the Government argued strenuously
that this requirement is mandatory, and its brief could
hardly have been more categorical or emphatic in making
this point.... | {
"CreationDate": "b\"D:20220629101941-04'00'\"",
"Creator": "b'PScript5.dll Version 5.2.2'",
"ModDate": "b\"D:20220629103107-04'00'\"",
"Producer": "b'Acrobat Distiller 21.0 (Windows)'",
"Title": "b'21-954 Biden v. Texas (06/30/2022)'",
"Author": null,
"CaseNumber": null,
"Company": null,
"Source": n... | null | 42 |
79 | ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/21pdf/21-954_7l48.pdf | 10
BIDEN v. TEXAS
ALITO, J., dissenting
of MPP has contributed to the current border surge” by giv-
ing aliens the “perverse incentiv[e],” id., at 837, App. 196,
to cross the border illegally in hopes of being paroled and
released. Id., at 79. Thus, the Government is failing to
meet the statutory deten... | {
"CreationDate": "b\"D:20220629101941-04'00'\"",
"Creator": "b'PScript5.dll Version 5.2.2'",
"ModDate": "b\"D:20220629103107-04'00'\"",
"Producer": "b'Acrobat Distiller 21.0 (Windows)'",
"Title": "b'21-954 Biden v. Texas (06/30/2022)'",
"Author": null,
"CaseNumber": null,
"Company": null,
"Source": n... | null | 43 |
81 | ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/21pdf/21-954_7l48.pdf | Cite as: 597 U. S. ____ (2022)
11
ALITO, J., dissenting
consistent with the ordinary meaning of “case-by-case” re-
view, and as the Court of Appeals pointed out, the circum-
stances under which §1182(d)(5)(B)) was adopted bolster
that conclusion. See 20 F. 4th, at 947 (After “the executive
branch on m... | {
"CreationDate": "b\"D:20220629101941-04'00'\"",
"Creator": "b'PScript5.dll Version 5.2.2'",
"ModDate": "b\"D:20220629103107-04'00'\"",
"Producer": "b'Acrobat Distiller 21.0 (Windows)'",
"Title": "b'21-954 Biden v. Texas (06/30/2022)'",
"Author": null,
"CaseNumber": null,
"Company": null,
"Source": n... | null | 44 |
83 | ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/21pdf/21-954_7l48.pdf | 12
BIDEN v. TEXAS
ALITO, J., dissenting
That reading ignores “the statutory structure” of the INA,
ante, at 14, and wrongly “confine[s] itself to examining a
particular statutory provision in isolation.” FDA v. Brown
& Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U. S. 120, 132 (2000). We
have an obligation to rea... | {
"CreationDate": "b\"D:20220629101941-04'00'\"",
"Creator": "b'PScript5.dll Version 5.2.2'",
"ModDate": "b\"D:20220629103107-04'00'\"",
"Producer": "b'Acrobat Distiller 21.0 (Windows)'",
"Title": "b'21-954 Biden v. Texas (06/30/2022)'",
"Author": null,
"CaseNumber": null,
"Company": null,
"Source": n... | null | 45 |
85 | ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/21pdf/21-954_7l48.pdf | Cite as: 597 U. S. ____ (2022)
13
ALITO, J., dissenting
discretionary authority, the district throws up its hands
and says to its high school students: “We’re sorry. If you
want to go to high school, you will have to make your own
arrangements and foot the bill.” If those students sue,
would ... | {
"CreationDate": "b\"D:20220629101941-04'00'\"",
"Creator": "b'PScript5.dll Version 5.2.2'",
"ModDate": "b\"D:20220629103107-04'00'\"",
"Producer": "b'Acrobat Distiller 21.0 (Windows)'",
"Title": "b'21-954 Biden v. Texas (06/30/2022)'",
"Author": null,
"CaseNumber": null,
"Company": null,
"Source": n... | null | 46 |
87 | ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/21pdf/21-954_7l48.pdf | 14
BIDEN v. TEXAS
ALITO, J., dissenting
not say expressly that it was meant to “operate as a man-
datory cure of any non-compliance with the Government’s
detention obligations.” Ante, at 14. But what logic compels
need not be stated expressly.
The majority also relies on the fact that the contiguous-
return ... | {
"CreationDate": "b\"D:20220629101941-04'00'\"",
"Creator": "b'PScript5.dll Version 5.2.2'",
"ModDate": "b\"D:20220629103107-04'00'\"",
"Producer": "b'Acrobat Distiller 21.0 (Windows)'",
"Title": "b'21-954 Biden v. Texas (06/30/2022)'",
"Author": null,
"CaseNumber": null,
"Company": null,
"Source": n... | null | 47 |
89 | ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/21pdf/21-954_7l48.pdf | Cite as: 597 U. S. ____ (2022)
15
ALITO, J., dissenting
powers of Congress over the matter.” Youngstown Sheet &
Tube Co. v. Sawyer, 343 U. S. 579, 637 (1952) (Jackson, J.,
concurring). And it is Congress, not the Judiciary, that
gave the Executive only three options for dealing with in-
admissible a... | {
"CreationDate": "b\"D:20220629101941-04'00'\"",
"Creator": "b'PScript5.dll Version 5.2.2'",
"ModDate": "b\"D:20220629103107-04'00'\"",
"Producer": "b'Acrobat Distiller 21.0 (Windows)'",
"Title": "b'21-954 Biden v. Texas (06/30/2022)'",
"Author": null,
"CaseNumber": null,
"Company": null,
"Source": n... | null | 48 |
91 | ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/21pdf/21-954_7l48.pdf | 16
BIDEN v. TEXAS
ALITO, J., dissenting
one of four responses from the Court of Appeals. The Court
of Appeals could have (1) dismissed the appeal as moot and
vacated the District Court’s judgment and injunction; (2)
held the appeal in abeyance for an unspecified time; (3)
evaluated the October ... | {
"CreationDate": "b\"D:20220629101941-04'00'\"",
"Creator": "b'PScript5.dll Version 5.2.2'",
"ModDate": "b\"D:20220629103107-04'00'\"",
"Producer": "b'Acrobat Distiller 21.0 (Windows)'",
"Title": "b'21-954 Biden v. Texas (06/30/2022)'",
"Author": null,
"CaseNumber": null,
"Company": null,
"Source": n... | null | 49 |
93 | ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/21pdf/21-954_7l48.pdf | Cite as: 597 U. S. ____ (2022)
17
ALITO, J., dissenting
to vacate its judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Proce-
dure 60(b). The Government had sought to expedite pro-
ceedings at every stage, including by seeking emergency re-
lief in the Fifth Circuit and this Court, and under thes... | {
"CreationDate": "b\"D:20220629101941-04'00'\"",
"Creator": "b'PScript5.dll Version 5.2.2'",
"ModDate": "b\"D:20220629103107-04'00'\"",
"Producer": "b'Acrobat Distiller 21.0 (Windows)'",
"Title": "b'21-954 Biden v. Texas (06/30/2022)'",
"Author": null,
"CaseNumber": null,
"Company": null,
"Source": n... | null | 50 |
95 | ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/21pdf/21-954_7l48.pdf | 18
BIDEN v. TEXAS
ALITO, J., dissenting
decided in its favor.7
Even if the Fifth Circuit had somehow concluded that the
October 29 Memoranda constituted final agency action with
some future legal consequences, the Court does not explain
what the Fifth Circuit should have done differently in the
circumstances... | {
"CreationDate": "b\"D:20220629101941-04'00'\"",
"Creator": "b'PScript5.dll Version 5.2.2'",
"ModDate": "b\"D:20220629103107-04'00'\"",
"Producer": "b'Acrobat Distiller 21.0 (Windows)'",
"Title": "b'21-954 Biden v. Texas (06/30/2022)'",
"Author": null,
"CaseNumber": null,
"Company": null,
"Source": n... | null | 51 |
97 | ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/21pdf/21-954_7l48.pdf | Cite as: 597 U. S. ____ (2022)
19
ALITO, J., dissenting
district court decision; second, take a purportedly “new” ac-
tion that achieves the same result as the one previously set
aside; and third, while declining to seek vacatur of the ear-
lier judgment in the district court, ask the court of appeals
to vacate... | {
"CreationDate": "b\"D:20220629101941-04'00'\"",
"Creator": "b'PScript5.dll Version 5.2.2'",
"ModDate": "b\"D:20220629103107-04'00'\"",
"Producer": "b'Acrobat Distiller 21.0 (Windows)'",
"Title": "b'21-954 Biden v. Texas (06/30/2022)'",
"Author": null,
"CaseNumber": null,
"Company": null,
"Source": n... | null | 52 |
98 | ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/21pdf/21-954_7l48.pdf | Cite as: 597 U. S. ____ (2022)
1
BARRETT, J., dissenting
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
_________________
No. 21–954
_________________
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED
STATES, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. TEXAS, ET AL.
ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF
APPEALS FOR THE FIFT... | {
"CreationDate": "b\"D:20220629101941-04'00'\"",
"Creator": "b'PScript5.dll Version 5.2.2'",
"ModDate": "b\"D:20220629103107-04'00'\"",
"Producer": "b'Acrobat Distiller 21.0 (Windows)'",
"Title": "b'21-954 Biden v. Texas (06/30/2022)'",
"Author": null,
"CaseNumber": null,
"Company": null,
"Source": n... | null | 53 |
99 | ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/21pdf/21-954_7l48.pdf | 2
BIDEN v. TEXAS
BARRETT, J., dissenting
frames as “requir[ing]” (rather than preventing) the Gov-
ernment’s enforcement of or compliance with the covered
immigration laws. E.g., 20 F. 4th 928, 1004 (CA5 2021). In
this case, that was the only ground pressed by respondents
below and relied on ... | {
"CreationDate": "b\"D:20220629101941-04'00'\"",
"Creator": "b'PScript5.dll Version 5.2.2'",
"ModDate": "b\"D:20220629103107-04'00'\"",
"Producer": "b'Acrobat Distiller 21.0 (Windows)'",
"Title": "b'21-954 Biden v. Texas (06/30/2022)'",
"Author": null,
"CaseNumber": null,
"Company": null,
"Source": n... | null | 54 |
101 | ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/21pdf/21-954_7l48.pdf | Cite as: 597 U. S. ____ (2022)
3
BARRETT, J., dissenting
This would all matter less if the jurisdictional question
were easy or unimportant—but it is neither. The Court’s
opinion papers over difficult issues, as I will discuss below,
and its jurisdictional holding is likely to affect many cases.
See, ... | {
"CreationDate": "b\"D:20220629101941-04'00'\"",
"Creator": "b'PScript5.dll Version 5.2.2'",
"ModDate": "b\"D:20220629103107-04'00'\"",
"Producer": "b'Acrobat Distiller 21.0 (Windows)'",
"Title": "b'21-954 Biden v. Texas (06/30/2022)'",
"Author": null,
"CaseNumber": null,
"Company": null,
"Source": n... | null | 55 |
103 | ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/21pdf/21-954_7l48.pdf | 4
BIDEN v. TEXAS
BARRETT, J., dissenting
of a question otherwise within its competence. See, e.g.,
California v. Texas, 593 U. S. ___, ___ (2021) (slip op., at 7)
(redressability “consider[s] the relationship between ‘the ju-
dicial relief requested’ and the ‘injury’ suffered”); Los Ange-
les v. Lyons,... | {
"CreationDate": "b\"D:20220629101941-04'00'\"",
"Creator": "b'PScript5.dll Version 5.2.2'",
"ModDate": "b\"D:20220629103107-04'00'\"",
"Producer": "b'Acrobat Distiller 21.0 (Windows)'",
"Title": "b'21-954 Biden v. Texas (06/30/2022)'",
"Author": null,
"CaseNumber": null,
"Company": null,
"Source": n... | null | 56 |
105 | ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/21pdf/21-954_7l48.pdf | Cite as: 597 U. S. ____ (2022)
5
BARRETT, J., dissenting
Court does not explain how it would work. Does it mean
that the restriction on remedial authority is subject to
waiver or forfeiture, so that a lower court can sometimes
properly enter non-individual injunctive relief that this ... | {
"CreationDate": "b\"D:20220629101941-04'00'\"",
"Creator": "b'PScript5.dll Version 5.2.2'",
"ModDate": "b\"D:20220629103107-04'00'\"",
"Producer": "b'Acrobat Distiller 21.0 (Windows)'",
"Title": "b'21-954 Biden v. Texas (06/30/2022)'",
"Author": null,
"CaseNumber": null,
"Company": null,
"Source": n... | null | 57 |
107 | ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/21pdf/21-954_7l48.pdf | 6
BIDEN v. TEXAS
BARRETT, J., dissenting
of nonjurisdictional rules. See, e.g., Hamer v. Neighborhood
Housing Servs. of Chicago, 583 U. S. ___, ___–___ (2017)
(slip op., at 2–3).
It reserves the question whether
§1252(f )(1) bars declaratory relief, an issue on which there
are conflicting vi... | {
"CreationDate": "b\"D:20220629101941-04'00'\"",
"Creator": "b'PScript5.dll Version 5.2.2'",
"ModDate": "b\"D:20220629103107-04'00'\"",
"Producer": "b'Acrobat Distiller 21.0 (Windows)'",
"Title": "b'21-954 Biden v. Texas (06/30/2022)'",
"Author": null,
"CaseNumber": null,
"Company": null,
"Source": n... | null | 58 |
109 | ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/21pdf/21-147_g31h.pdf | (Slip Opinion)
OCTOBER TERM, 2021
1
Syllabus
NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is
being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued.
The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been
... | {
"CreationDate": "b\"D:20220606160835-04'00'\"",
"Creator": "b'PScript5.dll Version 5.2.2'",
"ModDate": "b\"D:20220606161000-04'00'\"",
"Producer": "b'Acrobat Distiller 21.0 (Windows)'",
"Title": "b'21-147 Egbert v. Boule (06/08/2022)'",
"Author": null,
"CaseNumber": null,
"Company": null,
"Source": ... | null | 1 |
111 | ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/21pdf/21-147_g31h.pdf | 2
EGBERT v. BOULE
Syllabus
Amendment violation for unlawful retaliation. Invoking Bivens v. Six
Unknown Fed. Narcotics Agents, 403 U. S. 388, Boule asked the Dis-
trict Court to recognize a damages action for each alleged constitu-
tional violation. The District Court declined to extend Bivens as re-... | {
"CreationDate": "b\"D:20220606160835-04'00'\"",
"Creator": "b'PScript5.dll Version 5.2.2'",
"ModDate": "b\"D:20220606161000-04'00'\"",
"Producer": "b'Acrobat Distiller 21.0 (Windows)'",
"Title": "b'21-147 Egbert v. Boule (06/08/2022)'",
"Author": null,
"CaseNumber": null,
"Company": null,
"Source": ... | null | 2 |
113 | ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/21pdf/21-147_g31h.pdf | Cite as: 596 U. S. ____ (2022)
3
Syllabus
has national security implications.” Id., at ___. That reasoning applies
with full force here. The Court of Appeals disagreed because it viewed
Boule’s Fourth Amendment claim as akin to a “conventional” exces-
sive-force claim, as in Bivens, and less like the... | {
"CreationDate": "b\"D:20220606160835-04'00'\"",
"Creator": "b'PScript5.dll Version 5.2.2'",
"ModDate": "b\"D:20220606161000-04'00'\"",
"Producer": "b'Acrobat Distiller 21.0 (Windows)'",
"Title": "b'21-147 Egbert v. Boule (06/08/2022)'",
"Author": null,
"CaseNumber": null,
"Company": null,
"Source": ... | null | 3 |
115 | ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/21pdf/21-147_g31h.pdf | 4
EGBERT v. BOULE
Syllabus
merit is Boule’s claim that this Court identified a Bivens cause of ac-
tion under allegedly similar circumstances in Passman. Even assum-
ing factual parallels, Passman carries little weight because it predates
the Court’s current approach to implied causes of action. A plaintiff
c... | {
"CreationDate": "b\"D:20220606160835-04'00'\"",
"Creator": "b'PScript5.dll Version 5.2.2'",
"ModDate": "b\"D:20220606161000-04'00'\"",
"Producer": "b'Acrobat Distiller 21.0 (Windows)'",
"Title": "b'21-147 Egbert v. Boule (06/08/2022)'",
"Author": null,
"CaseNumber": null,
"Company": null,
"Source": ... | null | 4 |
116 | ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/21pdf/21-147_g31h.pdf | Cite as: 596 U. S. ____ (2022)
1
Opinion of the Court
NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the
preliminary print of the United States Reports. Readers are requested to
notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Wash-
ington, D. C. 20543,... | {
"CreationDate": "b\"D:20220606160835-04'00'\"",
"Creator": "b'PScript5.dll Version 5.2.2'",
"ModDate": "b\"D:20220606161000-04'00'\"",
"Producer": "b'Acrobat Distiller 21.0 (Windows)'",
"Title": "b'21-147 Egbert v. Boule (06/08/2022)'",
"Author": null,
"CaseNumber": null,
"Company": null,
"Source": ... | null | 5 |
118 | ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/21pdf/21-147_g31h.pdf | 2
EGBERT v. BOULE
Opinion of the Court
I
Blaine, Washington, is the last town in the United States
along U. S. Interstate Highway 5 before reaching the Cana-
dian border. Respondent Robert Boule is a longtime Blaine
resident. The rear of his property abuts the Canadian bor-
der at “0 Avenue,” a Canadian str... | {
"CreationDate": "b\"D:20220606160835-04'00'\"",
"Creator": "b'PScript5.dll Version 5.2.2'",
"ModDate": "b\"D:20220606161000-04'00'\"",
"Producer": "b'Acrobat Distiller 21.0 (Windows)'",
"Title": "b'21-147 Egbert v. Boule (06/08/2022)'",
"Author": null,
"CaseNumber": null,
"Company": null,
"Source": ... | null | 6 |
119 | ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/21pdf/21-147_g31h.pdf | Cite as: 596 U. S. ____ (2022)
3
Opinion of the Court
informant who would help federal agents identify and ap-
prehend persons engaged in unlawful cross-border activity
on or near his property. Boule claims that the Government
has paid him upwards of $60,000 for his services.
Ever the entrepreneur, Boule saw... | {
"CreationDate": "b\"D:20220606160835-04'00'\"",
"Creator": "b'PScript5.dll Version 5.2.2'",
"ModDate": "b\"D:20220606161000-04'00'\"",
"Producer": "b'Acrobat Distiller 21.0 (Windows)'",
"Title": "b'21-147 Egbert v. Boule (06/08/2022)'",
"Author": null,
"CaseNumber": null,
"Company": null,
"Source": ... | null | 7 |
121 | ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/21pdf/21-147_g31h.pdf | 4
EGBERT v. BOULE
Opinion of the Court
traveled more than 7,500 miles. See id., at 102.
Later that afternoon, Agent Egbert observed one of
Boule’s vehicles—a black SUV with the license plate
“SMUGLER”—returning to the Inn. Agent Egbert sus-
pected that Boule’s Turkish guest was a passeng... | {
"CreationDate": "b\"D:20220606160835-04'00'\"",
"Creator": "b'PScript5.dll Version 5.2.2'",
"ModDate": "b\"D:20220606161000-04'00'\"",
"Producer": "b'Acrobat Distiller 21.0 (Windows)'",
"Title": "b'21-147 Egbert v. Boule (06/08/2022)'",
"Author": null,
"CaseNumber": null,
"Company": null,
"Source": ... | null | 8 |
122 | ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/21pdf/21-147_g31h.pdf | Cite as: 596 U. S. ____ (2022)
5
Opinion of the Court
claims were pending by
those
reporting Boule’s
“SMUGLER” license plate to the Washington Department
of Licensing for referencing illegal conduct, and by contact-
ing the Internal Revenue Service and prompting an audit
of Boule’s tax returns. Ultima... | {
"CreationDate": "b\"D:20220606160835-04'00'\"",
"Creator": "b'PScript5.dll Version 5.2.2'",
"ModDate": "b\"D:20220606161000-04'00'\"",
"Producer": "b'Acrobat Distiller 21.0 (Windows)'",
"Title": "b'21-147 Egbert v. Boule (06/08/2022)'",
"Author": null,
"CaseNumber": null,
"Company": null,
"Source": ... | null | 9 |
124 | ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/21pdf/21-147_g31h.pdf | 6
EGBERT v. BOULE
Opinion of the Court
Fifth Amendment sex-discrimination claim, see Davis v.
Passman, 442 U. S. 228 (1979); and second, for a federal
prisoner’s inadequate-care claim under the Eighth Amend-
ment, see Carlson v. Green, 446 U. S. 14 (1980).
Since these cases, the Court has ... | {
"CreationDate": "b\"D:20220606160835-04'00'\"",
"Creator": "b'PScript5.dll Version 5.2.2'",
"ModDate": "b\"D:20220606161000-04'00'\"",
"Producer": "b'Acrobat Distiller 21.0 (Windows)'",
"Title": "b'21-147 Egbert v. Boule (06/08/2022)'",
"Author": null,
"CaseNumber": null,
"Company": null,
"Source": ... | null | 10 |
End of preview.
No dataset card yet
- Downloads last month
- 2,266
Models trained or fine-tuned on forcemultiplier/supreme_court_opinions_corpus_pdfwebAug24