hypothesis stringlengths 11 177 | context stringlengths 0 2.71k | hypothesis_formula stringlengths 3 35 | context_formula stringlengths 0 865 | proofs list | proof_label stringclasses 3
values | proofs_formula list | world_assump_label stringclasses 3
values | original_tree_depth int64 1 4 | depth int64 1 3 ⌀ | num_formula_distractors int64 0 22 | num_translation_distractors int64 0 0 | num_all_distractors int64 0 22 | negative_hypothesis stringlengths 15 158 ⌀ | negative_hypothesis_formula stringlengths 3 37 ⌀ | negative_original_tree_depth int64 0 25 ⌀ | negative_proofs list | negative_proof_label stringclasses 2
values | negative_world_assump_label stringclasses 2
values | prompt_serial stringlengths 99 2.85k | proof_serial stringlengths 11 654 | version stringclasses 1
value | premise stringlengths 0 188 | assumptions list | paraphrased_premises list | paraphrased_premise stringlengths 0 753 | assumption stringlengths 0 200 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
there is something such that if the fact that it is tetravalent and does not attack fecklessness is wrong the fact that it is not antinomian hold. | sent1: something is not a delineation if it is both hyperemic and not a rearrangement. sent2: if that something does attack notation and is not insoluble is wrong then it does spy. sent3: there is something such that if it is tetravalent and it does not attack fecklessness then it is not antinomian. sent4: there exists... | (Ex): ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> ¬{B}x | sent1: (x): ({AI}x & ¬{DJ}x) -> ¬{AS}x sent2: (x): ¬({DE}x & ¬{BF}x) -> {ER}x sent3: (Ex): ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> ¬{B}x sent4: (Ex): ¬({BP}x & ¬{GC}x) -> ¬{GG}x sent5: (x): {E}x -> ¬{AU}x sent6: ¬({GN}{bm} & ¬{AE}{bm}) -> {BA}{bm} sent7: (x): ¬({M}x & ¬{BS}x) -> ¬{AA}x sent8: (Ex): ¬({AQ}x & ¬{AH}x) -> ¬{CK}x sent9: {AB}{... | [] | UNKNOWN | [] | UNKNOWN | 2 | null | 13 | 0 | 13 | the lath is not tetravalent if that it is unlike and is not a kind of a schematization is not right. | ¬({M}{m} & ¬{BS}{m}) -> ¬{AA}{m} | 1 | [
"sent7 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | PROVED | $hypothesis$ = there is something such that if the fact that it is tetravalent and does not attack fecklessness is wrong the fact that it is not antinomian hold. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not a delineation if it is both hyperemic and not a rearrangement. sent2: if that something does attack notation and is not ... | __UNKNOWN__ | DeductionInstance | there exists something such that if the fact that it does pouch and does not overtake bird is not right then it is not biosystematics. | [
"there is something such that if it does overtake petabyte and does not broker then it is not a kind of a gangliocyte."
] | [
"there exists something such that if the fact that it does pouch and does not overtake bird is not right then it is not biosystematics."
] | there exists something such that if the fact that it does pouch and does not overtake bird is not right then it is not biosystematics. | there is something such that if it does overtake petabyte and does not broker then it is not a kind of a gangliocyte. |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.