| --- |
| language: |
| - en |
| license: |
| - cc-by-4.0 |
| - cc-by-nc-sa-4.0 |
| task_categories: |
| - visual-question-answering |
| - multiple-choice |
| pretty_name: RFSchemBench |
| size_categories: |
| - 1K<n<10K |
| configs: |
| - config_name: permissive |
| default: true |
| data_files: |
| - split: test |
| path: data/permissive/test-*.parquet |
| - config_name: nc_allowed |
| data_files: |
| - split: test |
| path: data/nc_allowed/test-*.parquet |
| tags: |
| - rf |
| - circuit |
| - schematic |
| - multimodal |
| - electronic-engineering |
| - benchmark |
| - vqa |
| --- |
| |
| # RFSchemBench |
|
|
| A multimodal LLM evaluation benchmark for **radio-frequency circuit schematic understanding**, organized by a four-level semantic hierarchy: |
|
|
| 1. **Component Understanding** — visible component, parameter, label, and supply-rail recognition. |
| 2. **Structural Understanding** — net membership, pin-to-net mapping, boundary connectivity, and pair-via-net topological reasoning. |
| 3. **Functional Understanding** — circuit functional role, signal-form classification, supply strategy, sub-type identification. |
| 4. **Dynamic Reasoning** — counterfactual plot choice and schematic-modification ↔ simulation-result matching, grounded in `ngspice` simulation. |
|
|
| The benchmark contains **2,348 questions across 590 rendered schematic pages** from publicly available RF schematic data. |
|
|
| ## Quick start |
|
|
| ```python |
| from datasets import load_dataset |
| |
| # Permissive subset (CC-BY-4.0; recommended for most users) |
| ds = load_dataset("anonymous-submission042/RFSchemBench", "permissive", split="test") |
| |
| # Full benchmark including a NonCommercial-ShareAlike subset |
| ds_nc = load_dataset("anonymous-submission042/RFSchemBench", "nc_allowed", split="test") |
| |
| print(ds[0]["question"], "→ answer:", ds[0]["answer"]) |
| ds[0]["image"].show() # PIL.Image of the schematic |
| ``` |
|
|
| ## Configurations |
|
|
| | Config | Rows | License | Notes | |
| |---|---:|---|---| |
| | `permissive` (default) | 2,258 | `CC-BY-4.0` | Excludes the NC-licensed source class. Suitable for commercial / industrial reviewers. | |
| | `nc_allowed` | 2,348 | mixed `CC-BY-4.0` + `CC-BY-NC-SA-4.0` | Full benchmark. Per-row `license` field marks which items are NC-licensed. NonCommercial usage only. | |
|
|
| ## Schema |
|
|
| Each row has the following fields: |
|
|
| | Field | Type | Description | |
| |---|---|---| |
| | `question_id` | string | Unique identifier (stable across releases) | |
| | `item_id` | string | Source schematic identifier | |
| | `source` | string | Source class (`qucs` / `kicad` / `myriadrf` / `m17` / `oresat`) | |
| | `level` | string | One of `Component Understanding` / `Structural Understanding` / `Functional Understanding` / `Dynamic Reasoning` | |
| | `category` | string | Coarse-grained tag | |
| | `question` | string | English prompt (what models are evaluated on) | |
| | `image` | PIL.Image | Primary schematic rendering (`image.png`) | |
| | `context_images` | list of `{caption, image}` | Auxiliary context images (Dynamic Reasoning only — schematic plus baseline / variant simulation plots) | |
| | `options` | list of `{label, text, image}` | Multi-choice options (Dynamic Reasoning only). Some options have only `text`, others have both `text` and `image`. | |
| | `answer_type` | string | `enum_label` / `comma_separated_list` / `integer` / `short_text` | |
| | `answer_allowed` | list of string | Permitted enum values (empty for non-enum types) | |
| | `answer` | string | Gold answer; for list-type answers, comma-separated | |
| | `source_schematic` | string | Provenance: original `.kicad_sch` / `.sch` path | |
| | `license` | string | Per-row license tag (`CC-BY-4.0` or `CC-BY-NC-SA-4.0`) | |
|
|
| ## Construction |
|
|
| The benchmark is constructed via **expert-rule-guided programmatic generation from authoritative sources**: |
|
|
| - Domain experts encode question-generation rules and gold-answer semantics into Python programs. |
| - Gold answers are extracted deterministically from authoritative source artifacts (KiCad CLI output, Qucs native schematic graph, `ngspice` simulation outputs). |
| - LLMs are deliberately **excluded from the gold-answer path**; they are used only as an auxiliary RF-relevance gate at the page level. |
| - An iterative rule-refinement loop catches edge cases during construction; the released gold answers reflect the latest revisions. |
|
|
| This avoids the gold-answer noise floor of LLM-as-Generator benchmarks while scaling beyond purely human-curated efforts. |
|
|
| ## License |
|
|
| This dataset is released under a **two-tier license model** because the upstream sources have heterogeneous licenses: |
|
|
| - **`permissive` config** (recommended default): all rows under `CC-BY-4.0`. Compatible with commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works subject to attribution. |
| - **`nc_allowed` config**: includes one source class (`m17` digital-radio community hardware, 90 questions) which is upstream-licensed under `CC-BY-NC-SA-4.0` (NonCommercial-ShareAlike). Per-row `license` field marks affected items. Users must respect NC + ShareAlike for those rows. |
| |
| Per-source licensing summary: |
| |
| | Source class | Upstream license profile | Tier inclusion | |
| |---|---|---| |
| | `qucs` | GPL-2.0 example schematics (treated as derivative-work CC-BY-4.0 for image renderings) | both | |
| | `kicad` | mostly MIT / Apache-2.0 / GPL-3.0 mix | both | |
| | `myriadrf` | mostly Apache-2.0 / CC-BY-4.0 | both | |
| | `oresat` | CERN-OHL-S-2.0 (treated as share-alike-compatible CC-BY-4.0 for renderings) | both | |
| | `m17` | **CC-BY-NC-SA-4.0** ⚠ NC | `nc_allowed` only | |
| |
| For redistribution that requires fully permissive licensing, use only the `permissive` config. |
| |
| ## Limitations |
| |
| 1. **Source-class size imbalance**: question counts per source class span 40–974; per-source claims should be reported with N. |
| 2. **Dynamic Reasoning scope**: only one source class has the simulation-grounded subset (55 questions). This dimension is reported as a small stress test, not the main result. |
| 3. **Language**: questions are evaluated in English. (A Chinese parallel set was used internally during construction for human review but is not part of the released schema.) |
| 4. **Single-image protocol**: each question is paired with one primary schematic image (Dynamic Reasoning rows additionally provide context plots / option plots). |
| 5. **Anonymized release**: this submission account is for double-blind peer review. The dataset will be transferred to the official maintainer account upon acceptance. |
| |
| ## Citation |
| |
| ```bibtex |
| @misc{rfschembench2026, |
| title = {RFSchemBench: A Multi-Source, Hierarchically-Structured Multimodal Benchmark for RF Circuit Schematic Understanding}, |
| author = {Anonymous}, |
| year = {2026}, |
| note = {Submitted to NeurIPS 2026 Evaluations \& Datasets Track} |
| } |
| ``` |
| |
| ## Contact |
| |
| For benchmark integrity issues (gold-answer corrections, RF-gate disputes, parser / scorer concerns), please open a Discussion on this dataset's HuggingFace page. During the double-blind review window, identifying contact details are intentionally withheld. |
| |