text stringlengths 9 720k | embeddings sequencelengths 128 128 |
|---|---|
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Hatcher, C.:
This is an appeal from a conviction of assault endangering the life of another as prohibited by K. S. A. 21-435.
The following facts may be gleaned from the state’s evidence.
On the 22nd day of June, 1968, shortly after 12:00 noon, the defendant and JoAnn Bracken, ... | [
-15,
-22,
-7,
-65,
11,
96,
42,
56,
118,
-89,
39,
-13,
-21,
-3,
5,
105,
57,
61,
84,
105,
-45,
-77,
87,
1,
-78,
-77,
-77,
-57,
-109,
75,
116,
118,
91,
112,
-118,
85,
2,
-126,
-11,
84,
-128,
4,
-71,
-16,
83,
86,
-80,
43,
-4... |
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Fontron, J.:
In this appeal we are concerned with the interpretation of fhe last will and testament of John F. Maguire. The foremost and primary question is stated by the parties to be whether fhe seventh paragraph violates the rule against perpetuities and is an unreasonable r... | [
-76,
108,
-103,
62,
42,
96,
42,
27,
114,
-111,
-26,
87,
-19,
74,
4,
111,
115,
41,
65,
122,
-13,
-13,
15,
-128,
-46,
-5,
-63,
84,
49,
95,
38,
-33,
77,
96,
-22,
-43,
-26,
-118,
-51,
82,
-116,
-41,
56,
-31,
-37,
96,
52,
123,
... |
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Fatzer, J.:
This was an action for personal injuries and property damage sustained by the plaintiff, Orby A. Curby, when his automobile was struck by a trailer owned by the defendant, Ulysses Irrigation Pipe Company, Inc. The trailer was being pulled by the defendant’s pickup t... | [
-16,
-18,
-72,
14,
11,
64,
2,
-40,
109,
-9,
117,
19,
-17,
-53,
13,
105,
-10,
29,
-43,
59,
-11,
-93,
71,
-112,
-46,
-77,
-7,
-42,
-101,
-55,
100,
118,
79,
48,
10,
-107,
-26,
-118,
-59,
92,
-50,
-122,
-120,
-20,
-39,
-126,
-72... |
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Fromme, J.:
Linvil “Red” O’Neal was convicted of second degree murder for shooting Jack Maples with a shotgun on October 23, 1967. The defendant waived a jury and was tried before the court. This is a direct appeal.
The defendant presents two specifications of error. The first ... | [
48,
-24,
-43,
-99,
41,
96,
106,
88,
18,
-15,
-30,
115,
-81,
-53,
77,
107,
58,
125,
84,
105,
72,
-73,
23,
97,
-78,
51,
-39,
-41,
-74,
-53,
-2,
125,
8,
80,
-38,
85,
102,
72,
-27,
92,
-116,
-107,
-87,
-14,
-62,
18,
40,
46,
... |
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Kaul, J.:
This is an appeal from an order denying relief on petitioners motion filed pursuant to K. S. A. 60-1507. Petitioner’s motion attacks a sentence for a term of not exceeding three years imposed after a plea of guilty to the offense of escaping from the Kansas State Peni... | [
80,
-22,
-3,
63,
11,
-32,
42,
24,
81,
-77,
102,
115,
-23,
90,
0,
123,
-39,
53,
84,
121,
92,
-73,
119,
-63,
-74,
-5,
89,
-43,
-77,
91,
-28,
-76,
72,
-128,
-118,
21,
-26,
-56,
71,
94,
-114,
1,
-120,
-47,
80,
8,
48,
107,
28... |
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Kaul, J.:
This is an appeal by respondent and its insurance carrier, hereafter referred to as respondents, from an award of permanent partial disability in a workmen’s compensation case.
The examiner’s award of compensation for seventy-five percent permanent partial disability ... | [
-16,
-8,
-35,
-97,
10,
98,
58,
-102,
112,
-116,
55,
83,
-81,
-46,
29,
41,
-13,
45,
64,
106,
-34,
51,
23,
9,
-62,
-9,
57,
-59,
-111,
123,
-28,
86,
77,
56,
-118,
-60,
-26,
-56,
-63,
20,
-56,
-106,
-87,
-19,
89,
-112,
56,
111... |
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Price, C. J.:
This case grows out of a tax foreclosure action.
K. S. A. 79-2804b provides that all actions to open, vacate, modify or set aside any tax foreclosure judgment or any sale made thereunder, must be commenced within twelve months after the date of confirmation of the... | [
-44,
-18,
-35,
12,
42,
-32,
106,
-104,
74,
37,
-90,
83,
-31,
-62,
20,
61,
-65,
37,
117,
104,
3,
-78,
23,
33,
118,
-69,
-47,
-35,
112,
-51,
-10,
-41,
12,
49,
-54,
117,
70,
-118,
-49,
94,
78,
-122,
9,
109,
81,
0,
52,
107,
... |
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Schroeder, J.:
This is a proceeding instituted pursuant to K. S. A. 60-1507 to vacate a judgment and sentence to life imprisonment upon the defendant’s conviction of murder in the first degree in the year 1956. Appeal has been duly perfected from the refusal of the trial court ... | [
-80,
-22,
-19,
-1,
43,
96,
58,
8,
83,
-73,
38,
115,
-23,
-38,
5,
120,
123,
61,
84,
105,
-61,
-78,
7,
-39,
-74,
-77,
107,
-43,
-78,
-40,
-90,
-76,
93,
-96,
-54,
21,
-26,
-56,
-59,
84,
-114,
5,
-119,
80,
-46,
10,
32,
44,
2... |
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Fontron, J.:
The defendant was charged with second degree burglary and larceny. On January 25, 1968, he appeared before the district court of Sedgwick County, Kansas, with retained counsel, and entered a plea of guilty to both charges. He was thereupon sentenced to the Kansas S... | [
112,
-24,
-7,
-65,
11,
-32,
42,
-40,
50,
-11,
-90,
115,
-31,
-58,
4,
121,
114,
127,
21,
121,
-63,
-74,
3,
83,
-14,
-13,
-37,
-43,
-1,
75,
-20,
-34,
8,
32,
-58,
-43,
-90,
-56,
5,
88,
-114,
5,
-104,
-32,
-42,
0,
32,
41,
86... |
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Schroeder, J.:
This is an action by the plaintiff to recover permanent and total disability benefits of $6,500 under a group insurance policy issued by the Aetna Life Insurance Company (defendant-appellee). The case was submitted to a jury which returned a verdict in favor of t... | [
80,
122,
-43,
-97,
10,
-32,
50,
26,
114,
-92,
39,
89,
-17,
-25,
77,
127,
-9,
13,
81,
122,
-65,
-93,
18,
10,
-41,
-73,
-5,
-59,
-72,
75,
-28,
116,
76,
48,
-118,
-43,
-26,
-56,
-59,
24,
-52,
4,
-69,
-19,
-7,
-110,
40,
47,
... |
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Fatzer, J.:
This was an action to recover monthly benefits under a health and accident disability income insurance policy. The case was here previously and the facts and issues giving rise to the present appeal are stated in the court’s opinion in Schneider v. Washington Nation... | [
-16,
-4,
-35,
15,
10,
-32,
42,
-118,
119,
-84,
55,
83,
-21,
87,
13,
49,
115,
45,
-47,
122,
23,
35,
119,
11,
-10,
-77,
-5,
-59,
-72,
111,
102,
116,
77,
32,
2,
85,
-26,
-56,
-59,
24,
-64,
-114,
-119,
-19,
-39,
80,
56,
107,
... |
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Hatcher, C.:
This is an appeal from an order overruling a motion for judgment against a non-answering garnishee because of improper service of the order of garnishment.
The facts are not in dispute. The appellants, J. B. Briscoe and his wife, obtained a money judgment against t... | [
-80,
104,
-72,
125,
10,
-32,
58,
-70,
97,
33,
-73,
83,
-83,
-30,
4,
109,
113,
41,
-44,
122,
69,
-78,
23,
-31,
-14,
-13,
-39,
93,
-79,
93,
-28,
118,
76,
48,
-126,
-105,
70,
-62,
-61,
20,
-114,
6,
41,
-11,
-47,
8,
48,
-5,
... |
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio
README.md exists but content is empty.
- Downloads last month
- 6