Dataset Viewer (First 5GB)
Auto-converted to Parquet Duplicate
Search is not available for this dataset
image
imagewidth (px)
226
4.1k
label
class label
3 classes
0crop
0crop
0crop
0crop
0crop
0crop
0crop
0crop
0crop
0crop
0crop
0crop
0crop
0crop
0crop
0crop
0crop
0crop
0crop
0crop
0crop
0crop
0crop
0crop
0crop
0crop
0crop
0crop
0crop
0crop
0crop
0crop
0crop
0crop
0crop
0crop
0crop
0crop
0crop
0crop
0crop
0crop
0crop
0crop
0crop
0crop
0crop
0crop
0crop
0crop
0crop
0crop
0crop
0crop
0crop
0crop
0crop
0crop
0crop
0crop
0crop
0crop
0crop
0crop
0crop
0crop
0crop
0crop
0crop
0crop
0crop
0crop
0crop
0crop
0crop
0crop
0crop
0crop
0crop
0crop
0crop
0crop
0crop
0crop
0crop
0crop
0crop
0crop
0crop
0crop
0crop
0crop
0crop
0crop
0crop
0crop
0crop
0crop
0crop
0crop
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio

AgriTaxon: Can Large Multimodal Models Identify What They See in Agriculture?

Xin Zeng, Benfeng Xu, Shancheng Fang, Huarui Wu

🌐 Project Page Β· πŸ’» GitHub Β· πŸ“Ž Supplementary Material

Overview

AgriTaxon is the first benchmark for open-ended taxonomic naming in agriculture. It tests whether Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) can correctly name a species from its imageβ€”without predefined options.

The benchmark spans four agricultural domains:

Track Species Source
🌿 Crops 1,971 FAO Ecocrop (via Wikidata P4753)
πŸ„ Livestock 178 FAO DAD-IS (via Wikidata P3380)
πŸ› Pests 3,485 EPPO (via Wikidata P3031)
🌾 Weeds 1,798 EPPO (via Wikidata P3031)
Total 7,432

Every label is linked to authoritative FAO and EPPO databases via Wikidata, forming a traceable authority chain.

Key Features

  • 7,432 species across four agricultural domains with entity-level species/breed labels
  • Authority-grounded labels: every entity linked to FAO/EPPO via Wikidata QIDs
  • Two evaluation protocols: multiple-choice (with semantically hard negatives) and open-ended naming
  • LLM-as-a-Judge scoring with 98% expert agreement for alias validation
  • AgriTaxon-Hard: 1,052-sample diagnostic subset where ≀2 of 14 frontier models answer correctly
  • Reveals a striking seeing-without-naming gap: best model reaches 83% on multiple-choice but drops to 33% on open-ended naming

Dataset Structure

β”œβ”€β”€ images/
β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ crop/          (1,971 images)
β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ livestock/     (178 images)
β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ pest/          (3,485 images)
β”‚   └── weed/          (1,798 images)
β”œβ”€β”€ annotations/
β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ {track}.jsonl          (open-ended: qid, label, image, track, source, wiki, KB_ID)
β”‚   └── {track}_mc.jsonl       (multiple-choice: includes distractor options)
β”œβ”€β”€ splits/
β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ hard.json              (AgriTaxon-Hard: 1,052 QIDs + selection criteria)
β”‚   └── hard_model_accuracy.json
└── metadata.json

Annotation Fields

Each {track}.jsonl entry contains:

Field Type Description
qid string Wikidata QID (e.g., Q12345)
label string Canonical species name
image string Relative path to image file
track string One of: crop, livestock, pest, weed
source string Wikidata property used for sourcing
enwiki string English Wikipedia article title (optional)
zhwiki string Chinese Wikipedia article title (optional)
ecocropID / faoID / eppoCode string Authority database identifier (track-dependent)

Each {track}_mc.jsonl additionally includes distractor options for multiple-choice evaluation.

Image Sources

All images are sourced from Wikimedia Commons under Creative Commons licenses (predominantly CC BY and CC BY-SA). Each image retains its original license. Images with a shorter dimension below 224px have been filtered out; images with max dimension above 4096px have been resized.

Usage

# Download the dataset
pip install huggingface_hub
huggingface-cli download Xin1818/AgriTaxon --repo-type dataset --local-dir AgriTaxon
import json

# Load open-ended annotations for a track
samples = []
with open("AgriTaxon/annotations/crop.jsonl", "r") as f:
    for line in f:
        samples.append(json.loads(line))

print(f"Loaded {len(samples)} crop species")
print(samples[0])

# Load multiple-choice annotations
mc_samples = []
with open("AgriTaxon/annotations/crop_mc.jsonl", "r") as f:
    for line in f:
        mc_samples.append(json.loads(line))

# Load AgriTaxon-Hard split
with open("AgriTaxon/splits/hard.json", "r") as f:
    hard = json.load(f)
print(f"AgriTaxon-Hard: {len(hard)} samples")

Evaluation Protocols

Multiple-Choice

Each question presents 4 options: 1 correct answer + 3 semantically hard negatives generated from text embeddings of taxonomically close species.

Open-Ended Naming

Models must produce the species name from scratch without any options. Evaluated with:

  • Exact Match (EM): after normalization (lowercasing, punctuation removal)
  • Acc (LLM-as-a-Judge): GPT-5 Mini validates whether predictions that fail EM are valid aliases (common names, taxonomic synonyms, spelling variants), achieving 98% expert agreement

Main Results

Accuracy (%) on AgriTaxon, ranked by open-ended Acc.

Model MC Mean OE EM OE Acc Hard
gemini-3-pro-preview 82.5 44.0 51.2 9.0
doubao-seed-2-0-pro 79.4 44.1 48.6 6.0
gemini-3-flash-preview 83.0 33.4 48.1 8.7
doubao-seed-2-0-lite 77.6 37.6 44.0 5.6
kimi-k2.5 73.7 30.0 38.0 2.1
gpt-5 78.6 29.6 37.6 8.4
glm-4.6v 65.1 22.7 30.1 6.2
qwen3-vl-235b-a22b 68.4 21.7 27.5 2.2
gpt-5-mini 71.6 22.0 27.4 7.7
qwen3.5-397b-a17b 71.9 21.7 26.8 9.2
qwen3-vl-30b-a3b 59.9 16.0 22.5 2.2
glm-4.6v-flashx 60.3 15.2 19.6 5.8
qwen3.5-35b-a3b 67.8 11.3 17.4 4.2
claude-haiku-4-5 60.4 11.2 14.7 4.7

Licensing

  • Benchmark metadata & annotations: CC BY 4.0
  • Images: sourced from Wikimedia Commons under their respective Creative Commons licenses (predominantly CC BY and CC BY-SA)
  • Source code & prompts: MIT License
  • Authority identifiers: Wikidata QIDs under CC0; FAO and EPPO identifiers used for reference linking only
Downloads last month
6,731