Dataset Viewer
Auto-converted to Parquet Duplicate
Search is not available for this dataset
video
video

YAML Metadata Warning:empty or missing yaml metadata in repo card

Check out the documentation for more information.

Jaco vs Franka Pick Task Comparison

Experiment Setup

  • Scene: iTHOR house 1
  • Seed: 42
  • Episodes: 2 per robot
  • Task: Pick (pick up object)

Results

Robot Success Rate Episodes Notes
Franka (Droid) 100% 2/2 Works reliably
Jaco 0% 0/1 IK failures during path execution

Key Finding

The Jaco robot fails due to IK failures during interpolated path following, NOT because of:

  • Grasp selection (grasps are the same for both robots)
  • Initial IK feasibility check (passes)
  • Final pose reachability (endpoints are feasible)

The issue is that Jaco's IK solver cannot reliably track all intermediate poses along the motion path. Franka succeeds because:

  1. It has a larger workspace
  2. Its IK solver handles path interpolation better

Recommendations

  1. Use cuRobo for motion planning instead of IK-based path following
  2. Generate Jaco-specific grasps that are more conservative
  3. Reduce motion speed further to give IK more time
  4. Consider trajectory optimization instead of linear interpolation

Files

  • franka_baseline/ - Franka experiment (100% success)
  • jaco_comparison/ - Jaco experiment (0% success)
  • JACO_IK_INVESTIGATION.md - Detailed analysis
  • jaco_datagen_configs.py - Jaco configuration with tuned parameters
Downloads last month
62