modify vision rubrics in main cases, add overall visualization goals to every cases, and remove rubrics that cannot be rated by comparing GT and result images

eval_cases/paraview/main_cases.yaml

@@ -72,13 +72,13 @@
     - type: llm-rubric
       subtype: vision
       value: |
-          1. Bone Isolation: Are the bones clearly visible while soft tissue and background are suppressed? Thin fin rays should be distinguishable without major loss.
+          1. Overall Visualization Goal: Does the result match the ground truth X-ray visualization of the carp skeleton?
 
-          2. Viewpoint Selection: Does the chosen viewpoint display the entire carp skeleton (head, spine, ribs, fins, tail) without critical occlusion?
+          2. Bone Visibility: Are the bones clearly visible with soft tissue and background suppressed, similar to the ground truth? Are thin fin rays distinguishable?
 
-          3. X-ray Appearance: Does the visualization resemble an X-ray (monochrome or grayscale, transparent look, consistent lighting)?
+          3. Skeletal Structure: Is the entire carp skeleton (head, spine, ribs, fins, tail) visible and similar in appearance to the ground truth?
 
-          4. Correct Data Setup: Was the dataset loaded with proper spacing (0.78125x0.390625x1.0)? The carp skeleton should appear in its correct proportions without distortion (i.e., the fish shape looks anatomically normal).
+          4. X-ray Appearance: Does the visualization have a monochrome/grayscale X-ray appearance similar to the ground truth?
     - type: llm-rubric
       subtype: text
       value: |
@@ -112,13 +112,13 @@
     - type: llm-rubric
       subtype: vision
       value: |
-          1. Overall Visualization Goal: Does the result present a clean, X-ray–style volume rendering where the chameleon's bony structures are clearly emphasized and soft tissue is faint but discernible?
+          1. Overall Visualization Goal: Does the result match the ground truth X-ray-style volume rendering of the chameleon?
 
-          2. Data Loading Correctness: Is the RAW volume loaded with the specified metadata (float32, little-endian, 256×256×270, 1 component) so that the histogram looks reasonable and the anatomy is not flipped or distorted?
+          2. Bone Structure Visibility: Are the chameleon's bony structures clearly visible and similar to the ground truth, with the skull, jaw, and spine clearly distinguishable?
 
-          3. Transfer Function Quality: Does the grayscale transfer function make low-intensity tissue mostly transparent while assigning higher opacity to bones/skin ridges, yielding good depth cues without over-saturation or banding?
+          3. Soft Tissue Rendering: Is the soft tissue faintly visible and transparent, similar to the ground truth appearance?
 
-          4. Camera & Framing: Is the camera positioned and zoomed to focus on the chameleon's head, keeping it sharply framed (no clipping), with a stable viewpoint that highlights key anatomical details?
+          4. Depth and Contrast: Does the visualization show similar depth cues and contrast between bones and soft tissue as the ground truth?
 
 # 4. Engine Dataset
 - vars:
@@ -179,13 +179,13 @@
     - type: llm-rubric
       subtype: vision
       value: |
-          1. Overall Visualization Goal: How well does the result achieve the overall goal of showing tornado flow patterns with glyphs and streamlines?
+          1. Overall Visualization Goal: Does the result match the ground truth streamline visualization of solar-plume flow structures?
 
-          2. Glyph Visualization: Does the result show velocity glyphs that are appropriately sized and visible?
+          2. Streamline Patterns: Do the streamlines show similar flow patterns and structures as the ground truth, particularly in the plume region?
 
-          3. Streamline Visualization: Does the result show streamlines that follow the flow patterns effectively?
+          3. Streamline Coverage: Is the spatial distribution and density of streamlines similar to the ground truth?
 
-          4. Tube Rendering: Are the streamlines rendered as tubes with appropriate thickness?
+          4. Visual Appearance: Do the streamline tubes appear similar in thickness and visibility to the ground truth?
 
 # 6. Supernova Dataset
 - vars:
@@ -241,11 +241,13 @@
     - type: llm-rubric
       subtype: vision
       value: |
-          1. Overall Visualization Goal: How well does the result reveal the tangaroa flow structures using streamlines expanded into surfaces with the Ribbon filter?
+          1. Overall Visualization Goal: Does the result match the ground truth visualization of tangaroa flow structures using ribbon surfaces?
+
+          2. Flow Surface Patterns: Do the ribbon surfaces show similar flow patterns and structures as the ground truth?
 
-          2. Streamline Seeding: Are streamlines correctly seeded from a Point Cloud centered at [81.6814, 80.708, 23.5093] with radius 29.9, and is the seed sphere hidden?
+          3. Surface Coverage: Is the spatial distribution and coverage of the flow surfaces similar to the ground truth?
 
-          3. Ribbon Visualization: Are the streamlines rendered with the Ribbon filter, set to width 0.3, with Display representation as Surface, effectively showing flow surfaces?
+          4. Visual Appearance: Do the ribbon surfaces appear similar in width and structure to the ground truth?
 
 # 8. Tornado Dataset
 - vars:
@@ -311,11 +313,13 @@
     - type: llm-rubric
       subtype: vision
       value: |
-          1. Overall Visualization Goal: How well does the result present a clear iso-surface rendering of the vortex scalar field at value −0.2?
+          1. Overall Visualization Goal: Does the result match the ground truth isosurface rendering of the vortex scalar field?
 
-          2. Contour Appearance: Is the contour rendered with Solid Color set to beige and made the only visible object in the pipeline?
+          2. Isosurface Structure: Does the isosurface show the same vortex structure and topology as the ground truth?
 
-          3. Lighting & Shading: Are Ambient Occlusion and a directional head light (Coords = Camera, Intensity = 0.2) applied?
+          3. Surface Appearance: Does the surface color and shading appear similar to the ground truth?
+
+          4. Visualization Clarity: Are the vortex features clearly visible and comparable to the ground truth?
 
 # 10. Foot Dataset
 - vars:
@@ -575,11 +579,13 @@
     - type: llm-rubric
       subtype: vision
       value: |
-        1) Arrow glyphs oriented by velocity vector
-        2) Glyphs scaled by velocity magnitude
-        3) Color mapping using Cool to Warm colormap on magnitude
-        4) Color bar present with label 'Velocity Magnitude'
-        5) Dark background color, Top-down camera view, and Output resolution 1024x1024
+          1. Overall Visualization Goal: Does the result match the ground truth glyph visualization of the MHD turbulence velocity field?
+
+          2. Glyph Patterns: Do the arrow glyphs show similar orientation and spatial patterns as the ground truth?
+
+          3. Glyph Scaling: Do the glyphs show similar size variations as the ground truth, reflecting the velocity magnitude patterns?
+
+          4. Color Mapping: Is the color distribution across glyphs visually similar to the ground truth?
 
 
 # 18. Rayleigh-Taylor Instability Velocity Field (t=50) (rti-velocity_glyph)
@@ -604,11 +610,13 @@
     - type: llm-rubric
       subtype: vision
       value: |
-        1) Arrow glyphs oriented by velocity vector
-        2) Uniform arrow size (no magnitude scaling)
-        3) Color by velocity magnitude with Viridis colormap 
-        4) Color bar present labeled 'Velocity Magnitude'
-        5) Black background, Camera along negative y-axis, and Output resolution 1024x1024
+          1. Overall Visualization Goal: Does the result match the ground truth glyph visualization of the RTI velocity field?
+
+          2. Glyph Patterns: Do the arrow glyphs show similar orientation and spatial patterns as the ground truth?
+
+          3. Glyph Appearance: Do the glyphs appear with similar uniform sizing as the ground truth?
+
+          4. Color Mapping: Is the color distribution across glyphs visually similar to the ground truth?
 
 
 # 19. MHD Magnetic Field (t=10) (mhd-magfield_glyph)
@@ -633,11 +641,13 @@
     - type: llm-rubric
       subtype: vision
       value: |
-        1) Arrow glyphs oriented by magnetic field vector
-        2) Glyphs scaled by field magnitude
-        3) Plasma colormap applied to magnitude
-        4) Color bar present labeled 'Magnetic Field Magnitude
-        5) Dark navy background, Camera along negative x-axis, Output resolution 1024x1024
+          1. Overall Visualization Goal: Does the result match the ground truth glyph visualization of the MHD magnetic field?
+
+          2. Glyph Patterns: Do the arrow glyphs show similar orientation and spatial patterns as the ground truth?
+
+          3. Glyph Scaling: Do the glyphs show similar size variations as the ground truth, reflecting the field magnitude patterns?
+
+          4. Color Mapping: Is the color distribution across glyphs visually similar to the ground truth?
 
 
 # 20. MHD Turbulence Velocity Field (t=30) (mhd-turbulence_streamline)
@@ -660,11 +670,13 @@
     - type: llm-rubric
       subtype: vision
       value: |
-       1) Streamlines generated from line seed along z-axis, with similar pattern compared to groundtruth
-       2) Streamlines rendered as tubes
-       3) Color by velocity magnitude with Turbo colormap
-       4) Color bar labeled 'Velocity Magnitude'
-       5) Dark background, Isometric camera view, Output resolution 1024x1024
+          1. Overall Visualization Goal: Does the result match the ground truth streamline visualization of the MHD turbulence velocity field?
+
+          2. Streamline Patterns: Do the streamlines show similar flow patterns and structures as the ground truth?
+
+          3. Streamline Coverage: Is the spatial distribution and density of streamlines similar to the ground truth?
+
+          4. Color Mapping: Is the color distribution along streamlines visually similar to the ground truth?
 
 
 # 21. Rayleigh-Taylor Instability Velocity Field (t=70) (rti-velocity_streamline)
@@ -687,11 +699,11 @@
     - type: llm-rubric
       subtype: vision
       value: |
-        1) Streamlines seeded from y=64 plane region, with similar pattern compared to groundtruth
-        2) Streamlines rendered as tubes
-        3) Color by vz with Cool to Warm diverging colormap
-        4) Color bar labeled 'Vz Component'
-        5) Dark background, Isometric camera view, Output resolution 1024x1024
+          1) Streamlines seeded from y=64 plane region, with similar pattern compared to groundtruth
+          2) Streamlines rendered as tubes
+          3) Color by vz with Cool to Warm diverging colormap
+          4) Color bar labeled 'Vz Component'
+          5) Dark background, Isometric camera view, Output resolution 1024x1024
 
 
 # 22. Turbulent Radiative Layer Velocity Field (tcool=0.10, t=50) (trl-velocity_streamline)
@@ -714,11 +726,11 @@
     - type: llm-rubric
       subtype: vision
       value: |
-        1) Streamlines seeded along x-axis line, with similar pattern compared to groundtruth
-        2) Streamlines rendered as tubes 
-        3) Color by magnitude with Inferno colormap
-        4) Color bar labeled 'Velocity Magnitude'
-        5) Black background, Isometric camera view, Output resolution 1024x1024
+          1) Streamlines seeded along x-axis line, with similar pattern compared to groundtruth
+          2) Streamlines rendered as tubes
+          3) Color by magnitude with Inferno colormap
+          4) Color bar labeled 'Velocity Magnitude'
+          5) Black background, Isometric camera view, Output resolution 1024x1024
 
 
 # 23. MHD Magnetic Field (t=40) (mhd-magfield_volvis)
@@ -737,16 +749,18 @@
         Save the paraview state as "mhd-magfield_volvis/results/{agent_mode}/mhd-magfield_volvis.pvsm".
         Save the visualization image as "mhd-magfield_volvis/results/{agent_mode}/mhd-magfield_volvis.png".
         (Optional, if use python script) Save the python script as "mhd-magfield_volvis/results/{agent_mode}/mhd-magfield_volvis.py".
-        Do not save any other files, and always save the visualization image.        
+        Do not save any other files, and always save the visualization image.
   assert:
     - type: llm-rubric
       subtype: vision
       value: |
-        1) Volume rendering representation applied based on magnitude field, generally similar to groundtruth
-        2) Cool to Warm colormap
-        3) Opacity transfer function correctly set: low=transparent, high=opaque
-        4) Color bar labeled 'B Magnitude' 
-        5) Dark background, Isometric camera, Output resolution 1024x1024
+          1. Overall Visualization Goal: Does the result match the ground truth volume rendering of the MHD magnetic field magnitude?
+
+          2. Volume Structure: Are the internal structures and features visible in the volume rendering similar to the ground truth?
+
+          3. Opacity Distribution: Does the transparency/opacity distribution appear similar to the ground truth, showing the same depth and internal features?
+
+          4. Color Mapping: Is the color distribution throughout the volume visually similar to the ground truth?
 
 
 # 24. Turbulence Gravity Cooling Velocity (temp=1000K, dens=4.45, metal=0.1Z, t=20) (tgc-velocity_volvis)
@@ -770,11 +784,13 @@
     - type: llm-rubric
       subtype: vision
       value: |
-        1) Volume rendering applied, generally similar to groundtruth
-        2) Viridis colormap
-        3) Gradual opacity transfer function
-        4) Color bar labeled 'Velocity Magnitude'
-        5) Dark gray background, Isometric camera, Output resolution 1024x1024
+          1. Overall Visualization Goal: Does the result match the ground truth volume rendering of the TGC velocity field magnitude?
+
+          2. Volume Structure: Are the internal structures and features visible in the volume rendering similar to the ground truth?
+
+          3. Opacity Distribution: Does the transparency/opacity distribution appear similar to the ground truth, showing the same depth and internal features?
+
+          4. Color Mapping: Is the color distribution throughout the volume visually similar to the ground truth?
 
 
 # 25. Rayleigh-Taylor Instability Velocity Field (t=40) (rti-velocity_divergence)
@@ -797,10 +813,13 @@
     - type: llm-rubric
       subtype: vision
       value: |
-        1) Divergence computation from velocity field, with similar pattern compared to groundtruth
-        2) Cool to Warm diverging colormap centered at 0
-        3) Color bar labeled 'Velocity Divergence'
-        4) White background, Top-down camera along negative z, Output resolution 1024x1024
+          1. Overall Visualization Goal: Does the result match the ground truth visualization of the RTI velocity divergence field?
+
+          2. Divergence Patterns: Are the divergence patterns and structures visible in the result similar to the ground truth?
+
+          3. Spatial Distribution: Does the spatial distribution of positive and negative divergence regions match the ground truth?
+
+          4. Color Mapping: Is the color distribution visually similar to the ground truth, showing similar divergence values?
 
 
 # 26. Turbulent Radiative Layer Velocity Field (tcool=1.00, t=30) (trl-velocity_isosurface)
@@ -822,11 +841,13 @@
     - type: llm-rubric
       subtype: vision
       value: |
-        1) Isosurface extraction at magnitude=0.8, with similar pattern compared to groundtruth
-        2) Isosurface colored by vx component
-        3) Cool to Warm colormap
-        4) Color bar labeled 'Vx Component'
-        5) Dark background, Isometric camera, Output resolution 1024x1024
+          1. Overall Visualization Goal: Does the result match the ground truth isosurface visualization of the TRL velocity field?
+
+          2. Isosurface Structure: Does the isosurface show similar topology and shape as the ground truth?
+
+          3. Surface Features: Are key features and structures on the isosurface similar to the ground truth?
+
+          4. Color Mapping: Is the color distribution across the isosurface visually similar to the ground truth?
 
 
 # 27. Supernova Explosion Velocity Field (t=30) (supernova-velocity_streamline)
@@ -850,11 +871,13 @@
     - type: llm-rubric
       subtype: vision
       value: |
-        1) Streamlines seeded from diagonal line, with similar pattern compared to groundtruth
-        2) Streamlines as tubes
-        3) Color by magnitude with Magma colormap
-        4) Color bar labeled 'Velocity Magnitude'
-        5) Dark background, Isometric camera, Output resolution 1024x1024
+          1. Overall Visualization Goal: Does the result match the ground truth streamline visualization of the supernova velocity field?
+
+          2. Streamline Patterns: Do the streamlines show similar flow patterns and structures as the ground truth?
+
+          3. Streamline Coverage: Is the spatial distribution and density of streamlines similar to the ground truth?
+
+          4. Color Mapping: Is the color distribution along streamlines visually similar to the ground truth?
 
 
 # 28. MHD Turbulence Velocity Field (t=50) (mhd-turbulence_vorticity)
@@ -879,12 +902,13 @@
     - type: llm-rubric
       subtype: vision
       value: |
-       1) Vorticity computation (curl of velocity), similar pattern compared to groundtruth
-       2) Volume rendering of vorticity magnitude
-       3) Plasma colormap
-       4) Opacity highlights high-vorticity regions
-       5) Color bar labeled 'Vorticity Magnitude'
-       6) Black background, Isometric camera, Output resolution 1024x1024
+          1. Overall Visualization Goal: Does the result match the ground truth volume rendering of the MHD turbulence vorticity field?
+
+          2. Vorticity Patterns: Are the vorticity structures and patterns visible in the result similar to the ground truth?
+
+          3. Volume Features: Are high-vorticity regions highlighted with similar opacity and visibility as the ground truth?
+
+          4. Color Mapping: Is the color distribution throughout the volume visually similar to the ground truth?
 
 
 # 29. Supernova Explosion Velocity Field (t=40) (supernova-velocity_isosurface)
@@ -906,11 +930,13 @@
     - type: llm-rubric
       subtype: vision
       value: |
-        1) Isosurface at magnitude=0.7, similar pattern compared to groundtruth
-        2) Colored by vz component
-        3) Blue to Red Rainbow colormap
-        4) Color bar labeled 'Vz Component'
-        5) Black background, Isometric camera, Output resolution 1024x1024
+          1. Overall Visualization Goal: Does the result match the ground truth isosurface visualization of the supernova velocity field?
+
+          2. Isosurface Structure: Does the isosurface show similar topology and shape as the ground truth?
+
+          3. Surface Features: Are key features and structures on the isosurface similar to the ground truth?
+
+          4. Color Mapping: Is the color distribution across the isosurface visually similar to the ground truth?
 
 
 # 30. MHD Magnetic Field (t=60) (mhd-magfield_isosurface)
@@ -928,16 +954,18 @@
         Save the paraview state as "mhd-magfield_isosurface/results/{agent_mode}/mhd-magfield_isosurface.pvsm".
         Save the visualization image as "mhd-magfield_isosurface/results/{agent_mode}/mhd-magfield_isosurface.png".
         (Optional, if use python script) Save the python script as "mhd-magfield_isosurface/results/{agent_mode}/mhd-magfield_isosurface.py".
-        Do not save any other files, and always save the visualization image.    
+        Do not save any other files, and always save the visualization image.
   assert:
     - type: llm-rubric
       subtype: vision
       value: |
-        1) Isosurface at magnitude=0.8, similar pattern compared to groundtruth
-        2) Colored by bx component
-        3) Turbo colormap
-        4) Color bar labeled 'Bx Component'
-        5) Dark navy background, Isometric camera, Output resolution 1024x1024
+          1. Overall Visualization Goal: Does the result match the ground truth isosurface visualization of the MHD magnetic field?
+
+          2. Isosurface Structure: Does the isosurface show similar topology and shape as the ground truth?
+
+          3. Surface Features: Are key features and structures on the isosurface similar to the ground truth?
+
+          4. Color Mapping: Is the color distribution across the isosurface visually similar to the ground truth?
 
 
 # 31. Turbulence Gravity Cooling Velocity (temp=100K, dens=0.445, metal=Z, t=10) (tgc-velocity_contour)
@@ -961,12 +989,13 @@
     - type: llm-rubric
       subtype: vision
       value: |
-        1) Slice at z=32 colored by magnitude, similar pattern compared to groundtruth
-        2) Viridis colormap on slice
-        3) Contour lines at specified values, similar pattern compared to groundtruth
-        4) White contour lines
-        5) Color bar labeled 'Velocity Magnitude'
-        6) Light gray background, Top-down camera, Output resolution 1024x1024
+          1. Overall Visualization Goal: Does the result match the ground truth slice and contour visualization of the TGC velocity field?
+
+          2. Slice Pattern: Does the colored slice show similar patterns and structures as the ground truth?
+
+          3. Contour Lines: Are the contour lines positioned and shaped similarly to the ground truth?
+
+          4. Color Mapping: Is the color distribution on the slice visually similar to the ground truth?
 
 
 # 32. Rayleigh-Taylor Instability Velocity Field (t=80) (rti-velocity_slices)
@@ -989,11 +1018,13 @@
     - type: llm-rubric
       subtype: vision
       value: |
-        1) Three orthogonal slices at x=64, y=64, z=64, similar pattern compared to groundtruth
-        2) All slices colored by velocity magnitude
-        3) Turbo colormap
-        4) Color bar labeled 'Velocity Magnitude'
-        5) Dark background, Isometric camera showing all three slices, Output resolution 1024x1024
+          1. Overall Visualization Goal: Does the result match the ground truth three-orthogonal-slice visualization of the RTI velocity field?
+
+          2. Slice Patterns: Do all three slices show similar patterns and structures as the ground truth?
+
+          3. Slice Positioning: Are the three orthogonal slices positioned and oriented similarly to the ground truth?
+
+          4. Color Mapping: Is the color distribution across all slices visually similar to the ground truth?
 
 # 33. MHD Magnetic Field Stream Surface (t=20) (mhd-magfield_streamsurface)
 # Isothermal magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) simulations capturing compressible turbulence phenomena relevant to astrophysical systems.
@@ -1012,17 +1043,18 @@
         Save the paraview state as "mhd-magfield_streamsurface/results/{agent_mode}/mhd-magfield_streamsurface.pvsm".
         Save the visualization image as "mhd-magfield_streamsurface/results/{agent_mode}/mhd-magfield_streamsurface.png".
         (Optional, if use python script) Save the python script as "mhd-magfield_streamsurface/results/{agent_mode}/mhd-magfield_streamsurface.py".
-        Do not save any other files, and always save the visualization image.    
+        Do not save any other files, and always save the visualization image.
   assert:
     - type: llm-rubric
       subtype: vision
       value: |
-        1) Stream surface generation from line seed along y-axis, bidirectional integration along magnetic field
-        2) Surface coloring by magnetic field magnitude
-        3) Cool to Warm colormap applied correctly
-        4) Specular lighting enabled 
-        5) Color bar with label 'Magnetic Field Magnitude'
-        6) Dark navy background (RGB: 0.0, 0.0, 0.12), Isometric camera view, Output resolution 1024x1024
+          1. Overall Visualization Goal: Does the result match the ground truth stream surface visualization of the MHD magnetic field?
+
+          2. Surface Patterns: Does the stream surface show similar flow patterns and structures as the ground truth?
+
+          3. Surface Coverage: Is the spatial extent and shape of the stream surface similar to the ground truth?
+
+          4. Color Mapping: Is the color distribution across the surface visually similar to the ground truth?
 
 
 # 34. Rayleigh-Taylor Instability Stream Surface (t=60) (rti-velocity_streamsurface)
@@ -1046,13 +1078,13 @@
     - type: llm-rubric
       subtype: vision
       value: |
-        1) Stream surface from circular ring seed at y=64
-        2) Circle centered at (64, 64) in xz-plane with radius 30
-        3) Bidirectional integration along velocity field 
-        4) Surface coloring by vy (vertical velocity) component, Surface opacity set to 0.85
-        5) Cool to Warm (Extended) diverging colormap
-        6) Color bar with label 'Vertical Velocity (vy)'
-        7) Black background, Elevated camera view (45 degrees), Output resolution 1024x1024
+          1. Overall Visualization Goal: Does the result match the ground truth stream surface visualization of the RTI velocity field?
+
+          2. Surface Patterns: Does the stream surface show similar flow patterns and structures as the ground truth?
+
+          3. Surface Coverage: Is the spatial extent and shape of the stream surface similar to the ground truth?
+
+          4. Color Mapping: Is the color distribution across the surface visually similar to the ground truth?
 
 
 # 35. Supernova Explosion Pathlines (Multi-timestep) (supernova-velocity_pathline)
@@ -1077,12 +1109,13 @@
     - type: llm-rubric
       subtype: vision
       value: |
-        1) Time-varying vector field handling, Streamline generation for each timestep 
-        2) Spherical shell seed centered at (64,64,64) with radius 20
-        3) 50 seed particles, Forward streamline tracing with max length 80
-        4) Tube rendering with radius 0.25, Color-coded temporal progression (blue to red) 
-        5) Turbo colormap for magnitude coloring, Color bar with label 'Velocity Magnitude'
-        6) Dark background (RGB: 0.02, 0.0, 0.04), Isometric camera view, Output resolution 1024x1024
+          1. Overall Visualization Goal: Does the result match the ground truth pathline visualization of the supernova velocity field?
+
+          2. Pathline Patterns: Do the pathlines show similar trajectories and flow structures as the ground truth?
+
+          3. Pathline Coverage: Is the spatial distribution and density of pathlines similar to the ground truth?
+
+          4. Color Mapping: Is the color distribution along pathlines visually similar to the ground truth?
 
 
 # 36. MHD Turbulence Path Surface (Multi-timestep) (mhd-turbulence_pathsurface)
@@ -1107,13 +1140,13 @@
     - type: llm-rubric
       subtype: vision
       value: |
-          1) Time-varying vector field handling, Stream surface generation for each timestep
-          2) Line seed along z-axis at x=64, y=64
-          3) Seed from z=40 to z=88 with 20 points, Bidirectional streamline tracing
-          4) Ribbon surface creation with width 0.8
-          5) Progressive opacity (0.3 to 0.9)
-          6) Viridis (matplotlib) colormap,  Color bar with label 'Velocity Magnitude'
-          7) Dark gray background (RGB: 0.08, 0.08, 0.1), Isometric camera view, Output resolution 1024x1024
+          1. Overall Visualization Goal: Does the result match the ground truth path surface visualization of the MHD turbulence velocity field?
+
+          2. Surface Patterns: Does the path surface show similar flow patterns and structures as the ground truth?
+
+          3. Surface Coverage: Is the spatial extent and shape of the path surface similar to the ground truth?
+
+          4. Color Mapping: Is the color distribution across the surface visually similar to the ground truth?
 
 
 # 37. Rayleigh-Taylor Instability Streaklines (Multi-timestep) (rti-velocity_streakline)
@@ -1139,13 +1172,13 @@
     - type: llm-rubric
       subtype: vision
       value: |
-          1) Time-varying vector field handling, Streamline generation from 4 injection points
-          2) Injection points at (32,64,64), (64,64,32), (96,64,64), (64,64,96)
-          3) Bidirectional tracing with max length 100
-          4) Tube rendering with radius 0.4
-          5) Color-coded temporal progression (blue to red),  Cool to Warm diverging colormap for vy
-          6) Color bar with label 'Vertical Velocity (vy)'
-          7) Black background, Elevated camera view (elevation 35 degrees), Output resolution 1024x1024
+          1. Overall Visualization Goal: Does the result match the ground truth streakline visualization of the RTI velocity field?
+
+          2. Streakline Patterns: Do the streaklines show similar trajectories and flow structures as the ground truth?
+
+          3. Streakline Coverage: Is the spatial distribution of streaklines from the injection points similar to the ground truth?
+
+          4. Color Mapping: Is the color distribution along streaklines visually similar to the ground truth?
 
 
 # 38. Turbulent Radiative Layer Timelines (Multi-timestep) (trl-velocity_timeline)
@@ -1170,9 +1203,10 @@
     - type: llm-rubric
       subtype: vision
       value: |
-        1) Time-varying vector field handling (256x128x128 grid), Streamline generation from line seed for each timestep
-        2) Line seed along z-axis at x=128, y=64, 50 seed points from z=20 to z=108
-        3) Bidirectional tracing with max length 150, Tube rendering with radius 0.5
-        4) Spectral color-coded temporal progression
-        5) Spectral colormap for magnitude, Color bar with label 'Velocity Magnitude'
-        6) Dark background (RGB: 0.0, 0.0, 0.02), Oblique camera view (azimuth 45, elevation 20), Output resolution 1024x1024
+          1. Overall Visualization Goal: Does the result match the ground truth timeline visualization of the TRL velocity field?
+
+          2. Timeline Patterns: Do the timelines show similar trajectories and temporal evolution as the ground truth?
+
+          3. Timeline Coverage: Is the spatial distribution and density of timelines similar to the ground truth?
+
+          4. Color Mapping: Is the color distribution along timelines visually similar to the ground truth?

main/carp/visualization_goals.txt

@@ -1,11 +1,11 @@
 vision:
-1. Bone Isolation: Are the bones clearly visible while soft tissue and background are suppressed? Thin fin rays should be distinguishable without major loss.
+1. Overall Visualization Goal: Does the result match the ground truth X-ray visualization of the carp skeleton?
 
-2. Viewpoint Selection: Does the chosen viewpoint display the entire carp skeleton (head, spine, ribs, fins, tail) without critical occlusion?
+2. Bone Visibility: Are the bones clearly visible with soft tissue and background suppressed, similar to the ground truth? Are thin fin rays distinguishable?
 
-3. X-ray Appearance: Does the visualization resemble an X-ray (monochrome or grayscale, transparent look, consistent lighting)?
+3. Skeletal Structure: Is the entire carp skeleton (head, spine, ribs, fins, tail) visible and similar in appearance to the ground truth?
 
-4. Correct Data Setup: Was the dataset loaded with proper spacing (0.78125 × 0.390625 × 1.0)? The carp skeleton should appear in its correct proportions without distortion (i.e., the fish shape looks anatomically normal).
+4. X-ray Appearance: Does the visualization have a monochrome/grayscale X-ray appearance similar to the ground truth?
 
 text:
 1. Q1 correct answer: C. 7 fins: 1 dorsal, 2 pectoral, 2 pelvic, 1 anal, 1 caudal

main/chameleon_volvis/visualization_goals.txt

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
-1. Overall Visualization Goal: Does the result present a clean, X-ray–style volume rendering where the chameleon’s bony structures are clearly emphasized and soft tissue is faint but discernible?
+1. Overall Visualization Goal: Does the result match the ground truth X-ray-style volume rendering of the chameleon?
 
-2. Data Loading Correctness: Is the RAW volume loaded with the specified metadata (float32, little-endian, 256×256×270, 1 component) so that the histogram looks reasonable and the anatomy is not flipped or distorted?
+2. Bone Structure Visibility: Are the chameleon's bony structures clearly visible and similar to the ground truth, with the skull, jaw, and spine clearly distinguishable?
 
-3. Transfer Function Quality: Does the grayscale transfer function make low-intensity tissue mostly transparent while assigning higher opacity to bones/skin ridges, yielding good depth cues without over-saturation or banding?
+3. Soft Tissue Rendering: Is the soft tissue faintly visible and transparent, similar to the ground truth appearance?
 
-4. Camera & Framing: Is the camera positioned and zoomed to focus on the chameleon’s head, keeping it sharply framed (no clipping), with a stable viewpoint that highlights key anatomical details?
+4. Depth and Contrast: Does the visualization show similar depth cues and contrast between bones and soft tissue as the ground truth?

main/mhd-magfield_glyph/visualization_goals.txt

@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
-1) Arrow glyphs oriented by magnetic field vector
-2) Glyphs scaled by field magnitude
-3) Plasma colormap applied to magnitude
-4) Color bar present labeled 'Magnetic Field Magnitude
-5) Dark navy background, Camera along negative x-axis, Output resolution 1024x1024
+1. Overall Visualization Goal: Does the result match the ground truth glyph visualization of the MHD magnetic field?
+
+2. Glyph Patterns: Do the arrow glyphs show similar orientation and spatial patterns as the ground truth?
+
+3. Glyph Scaling: Do the glyphs show similar size variations as the ground truth, reflecting the field magnitude patterns?
+
+4. Color Mapping: Is the color distribution across glyphs visually similar to the ground truth?

main/mhd-magfield_isosurface/visualization_goals.txt

@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
-1) Isosurface at magnitude=0.8, similar pattern compared to groundtruth
-2) Colored by bx component
-3) Turbo colormap
-4) Color bar labeled 'Bx Component'
-5) Dark navy background, Isometric camera, Output resolution 1024x1024
+1. Overall Visualization Goal: Does the result match the ground truth isosurface visualization of the MHD magnetic field?
+
+2. Isosurface Structure: Does the isosurface show similar topology and shape as the ground truth?
+
+3. Surface Features: Are key features and structures on the isosurface similar to the ground truth?
+
+4. Color Mapping: Is the color distribution across the isosurface visually similar to the ground truth?

main/mhd-magfield_streamsurface/visualization_goals.txt

@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
-1) Stream surface generation from line seed along y-axis, bidirectional integration along magnetic field
-2) Surface coloring by magnetic field magnitude
-3) Cool to Warm colormap applied correctly
-4) Specular lighting enabled 
-5) Color bar with label 'Magnetic Field Magnitude'
-6) Dark navy background (RGB: 0.0, 0.0, 0.12), Isometric camera view, Output resolution 1024x1024
+1. Overall Visualization Goal: Does the result match the ground truth stream surface visualization of the MHD magnetic field?
+
+2. Surface Patterns: Does the stream surface show similar flow patterns and structures as the ground truth?
+
+3. Surface Coverage: Is the spatial extent and shape of the stream surface similar to the ground truth?
+
+4. Color Mapping: Is the color distribution across the surface visually similar to the ground truth?

main/mhd-magfield_volvis/visualization_goals.txt

@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
-1) Volume rendering representation applied based on magnitude field, generally similar to groundtruth
-2) Cool to Warm colormap
-3) Opacity transfer function correctly set: low=transparent, high=opaque
-4) Color bar labeled 'B Magnitude' 
-5) Dark background, Isometric camera, Output resolution 1024x1024
+1. Overall Visualization Goal: Does the result match the ground truth volume rendering of the MHD magnetic field magnitude?
+
+2. Volume Structure: Are the internal structures and features visible in the volume rendering similar to the ground truth?
+
+3. Opacity Distribution: Does the transparency/opacity distribution appear similar to the ground truth, showing the same depth and internal features?
+
+4. Color Mapping: Is the color distribution throughout the volume visually similar to the ground truth?

main/mhd-turbulence_glyph/visualization_goals.txt

@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
-1) Arrow glyphs oriented by velocity vector
-2) Glyphs scaled by velocity magnitude
-3) Color mapping using Cool to Warm colormap on magnitude
-4) Color bar present with label 'Velocity Magnitude'
-5) Dark background color, Top-down camera view, and Output resolution 1024x1024
+1. Overall Visualization Goal: Does the result match the ground truth glyph visualization of the MHD turbulence velocity field?
+
+2. Glyph Patterns: Do the arrow glyphs show similar orientation and spatial patterns as the ground truth?
+
+3. Glyph Scaling: Do the glyphs show similar size variations as the ground truth, reflecting the velocity magnitude patterns?
+
+4. Color Mapping: Is the color distribution across glyphs visually similar to the ground truth?

main/mhd-turbulence_pathsurface/visualization_goals.txt

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
-1) Time-varying vector field handling, Stream surface generation for each timestep
-2) Line seed along z-axis at x=64, y=64
-3) Seed from z=40 to z=88 with 20 points, Bidirectional streamline tracing
-4) Ribbon surface creation with width 0.8
-5) Progressive opacity (0.3 to 0.9)
-6) Viridis (matplotlib) colormap,  Color bar with label 'Velocity Magnitude'
-7) Dark gray background (RGB: 0.08, 0.08, 0.1), Isometric camera view, Output resolution 1024x1024
+1. Overall Visualization Goal: Does the result match the ground truth path surface visualization of the MHD turbulence velocity field?
+
+2. Surface Patterns: Does the path surface show similar flow patterns and structures as the ground truth?
+
+3. Surface Coverage: Is the spatial extent and shape of the path surface similar to the ground truth?
+
+4. Color Mapping: Is the color distribution across the surface visually similar to the ground truth?

main/mhd-turbulence_streamline/visualization_goals.txt

@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
-1) Streamlines generated from line seed along z-axis, with similar pattern compared to groundtruth
-2) Streamlines rendered as tubes
-3) Color by velocity magnitude with Turbo colormap
-4) Color bar labeled 'Velocity Magnitude'
-5) Dark background, Isometric camera view, Output resolution 1024x1024
+1. Overall Visualization Goal: Does the result match the ground truth streamline visualization of the MHD turbulence velocity field?
+
+2. Streamline Patterns: Do the streamlines show similar flow patterns and structures as the ground truth?
+
+3. Streamline Coverage: Is the spatial distribution and density of streamlines similar to the ground truth?
+
+4. Color Mapping: Is the color distribution along streamlines visually similar to the ground truth?

main/mhd-turbulence_vorticity/visualization_goals.txt

@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
-1) Vorticity computation (curl of velocity), similar pattern compared to groundtruth
-2) Volume rendering of vorticity magnitude
-3) Plasma colormap
-4) Opacity highlights high-vorticity regions
-5) Color bar labeled 'Vorticity Magnitude'
-6) Black background, Isometric camera, Output resolution 1024x1024
+1. Overall Visualization Goal: Does the result match the ground truth volume rendering of the MHD turbulence vorticity field?
+
+2. Vorticity Patterns: Are the vorticity structures and patterns visible in the result similar to the ground truth?
+
+3. Volume Features: Are high-vorticity regions highlighted with similar opacity and visibility as the ground truth?
+
+4. Color Mapping: Is the color distribution throughout the volume visually similar to the ground truth?

main/rti-velocity_divergence/visualization_goals.txt

@@ -1,4 +1,7 @@
-1) Divergence computation from velocity field, with similar pattern compared to groundtruth
-2) Cool to Warm diverging colormap centered at 0
-3) Color bar labeled 'Velocity Divergence'
-4) White background, Top-down camera along negative z, Output resolution 1024x1024
+1. Overall Visualization Goal: Does the result match the ground truth visualization of the RTI velocity divergence field?
+
+2. Divergence Patterns: Are the divergence patterns and structures visible in the result similar to the ground truth?
+
+3. Spatial Distribution: Does the spatial distribution of positive and negative divergence regions match the ground truth?
+
+4. Color Mapping: Is the color distribution visually similar to the ground truth, showing similar divergence values?

main/rti-velocity_glyph/visualization_goals.txt

@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
-1) Arrow glyphs oriented by velocity vector
-2) Uniform arrow size (no magnitude scaling)
-3) Color by velocity magnitude with Viridis colormap 
-4) Color bar present labeled 'Velocity Magnitude'
-5) Black background, Camera along negative y-axis, and Output resolution 1024x1024
+1. Overall Visualization Goal: Does the result match the ground truth glyph visualization of the RTI velocity field?
+
+2. Glyph Patterns: Do the arrow glyphs show similar orientation and spatial patterns as the ground truth?
+
+3. Glyph Appearance: Do the glyphs appear with similar uniform sizing as the ground truth?
+
+4. Color Mapping: Is the color distribution across glyphs visually similar to the ground truth?

main/rti-velocity_slices/visualization_goals.txt

@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
-1) Three orthogonal slices at x=64, y=64, z=64, similar pattern compared to groundtruth
-2) All slices colored by velocity magnitude
-3) Turbo colormap
-4) Color bar labeled 'Velocity Magnitude'
-5) Dark background, Isometric camera showing all three slices, Output resolution 1024x1024
+1. Overall Visualization Goal: Does the result match the ground truth three-orthogonal-slice visualization of the RTI velocity field?
+
+2. Slice Patterns: Do all three slices show similar patterns and structures as the ground truth?
+
+3. Slice Positioning: Are the three orthogonal slices positioned and oriented similarly to the ground truth?
+
+4. Color Mapping: Is the color distribution across all slices visually similar to the ground truth?

main/rti-velocity_streakline/visualization_goals.txt

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
-1) Time-varying vector field handling, Streamline generation from 4 injection points
-2) Injection points at (32,64,64), (64,64,32), (96,64,64), (64,64,96)
-3) Bidirectional tracing with max length 100
-4) Tube rendering with radius 0.4
-5) Color-coded temporal progression (blue to red),  Cool to Warm diverging colormap for vy
-6) Color bar with label 'Vertical Velocity (vy)'
-7) Black background, Elevated camera view (elevation 35 degrees), Output resolution 1024x1024
+1. Overall Visualization Goal: Does the result match the ground truth streakline visualization of the RTI velocity field?
+
+2. Streakline Patterns: Do the streaklines show similar trajectories and flow structures as the ground truth?
+
+3. Streakline Coverage: Is the spatial distribution of streaklines from the injection points similar to the ground truth?
+
+4. Color Mapping: Is the color distribution along streaklines visually similar to the ground truth?

main/rti-velocity_streamsurface/visualization_goals.txt

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
-1) Stream surface from circular ring seed at y=64
-2) Circle centered at (64, 64) in xz-plane with radius 30
-3) Bidirectional integration along velocity field 
-4) Surface coloring by vy (vertical velocity) component, Surface opacity set to 0.85
-5) Cool to Warm (Extended) diverging colormap
-6) Color bar with label 'Vertical Velocity (vy)'
-7) Black background, Elevated camera view (45 degrees), Output resolution 1024x1024
+1. Overall Visualization Goal: Does the result match the ground truth stream surface visualization of the RTI velocity field?
+
+2. Surface Patterns: Does the stream surface show similar flow patterns and structures as the ground truth?
+
+3. Surface Coverage: Is the spatial extent and shape of the stream surface similar to the ground truth?
+
+4. Color Mapping: Is the color distribution across the surface visually similar to the ground truth?

main/solar-plume/visualization_goals.txt

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
-1. Overall Visualization Goal: How well does the result reveal solar-plume flow structures using streamlines rendered as tubes, with emphasis on the region near [50, 50, 320]?
+1. Overall Visualization Goal: Does the result match the ground truth streamline visualization of solar-plume flow structures?
 
-2. Seeding (Point Cloud): Are streamlines seeded with a Point Cloud centered at [50, 50, 320] with a radius of 30, and is the seed sphere hidden?
+2. Streamline Patterns: Do the streamlines show similar flow patterns and structures as the ground truth, particularly in the plume region?
 
-3. Streamline Visualization: Do the streamlines follow the flow patterns effectively and provide adequate coverage of the plume region?
+3. Streamline Coverage: Is the spatial distribution and density of streamlines similar to the ground truth?
 
-4. Tube Rendering & Visibility: Are the streamlines rendered as tubes with radius 0.5, and is only the Tube filter visible (Stream Tracer and seed display hidden)?
+4. Visual Appearance: Do the streamline tubes appear similar in thickness and visibility to the ground truth?

main/supernova-velocity_isosurface/visualization_goals.txt

@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
-1) Isosurface at magnitude=0.7, similar pattern compared to groundtruth
-2) Colored by vz component
-3) Blue to Red Rainbow colormap
-4) Color bar labeled 'Vz Component'
-5) Black background, Isometric camera, Output resolution 1024x1024
+1. Overall Visualization Goal: Does the result match the ground truth isosurface visualization of the supernova velocity field?
+
+2. Isosurface Structure: Does the isosurface show similar topology and shape as the ground truth?
+
+3. Surface Features: Are key features and structures on the isosurface similar to the ground truth?
+
+4. Color Mapping: Is the color distribution across the isosurface visually similar to the ground truth?

main/supernova-velocity_pathline/visualization_goals.txt

@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
-1) Time-varying vector field handling, Streamline generation for each timestep 
-2) Spherical shell seed centered at (64,64,64) with radius 20
-3) 50 seed particles, Forward streamline tracing with max length 80
-4) Tube rendering with radius 0.25, Color-coded temporal progression (blue to red) 
-5) Turbo colormap for magnitude coloring, Color bar with label 'Velocity Magnitude'
-6) Dark background (RGB: 0.02, 0.0, 0.04), Isometric camera view, Output resolution 1024x1024
+1. Overall Visualization Goal: Does the result match the ground truth pathline visualization of the supernova velocity field?
+
+2. Pathline Patterns: Do the pathlines show similar trajectories and flow structures as the ground truth?
+
+3. Pathline Coverage: Is the spatial distribution and density of pathlines similar to the ground truth?
+
+4. Color Mapping: Is the color distribution along pathlines visually similar to the ground truth?

main/supernova-velocity_streamline/visualization_goals.txt

@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
-1) Streamlines seeded from diagonal line, with similar pattern compared to groundtruth
-2) Streamlines as tubes
-3) Color by magnitude with Magma colormap
-4) Color bar labeled 'Velocity Magnitude'
-5) Dark background, Isometric camera, Output resolution 1024x1024
+1. Overall Visualization Goal: Does the result match the ground truth streamline visualization of the supernova velocity field?
+
+2. Streamline Patterns: Do the streamlines show similar flow patterns and structures as the ground truth?
+
+3. Streamline Coverage: Is the spatial distribution and density of streamlines similar to the ground truth?
+
+4. Color Mapping: Is the color distribution along streamlines visually similar to the ground truth?

main/tangaroa/visualization_goals.txt

@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
-1. Overall Visualization Goal: How well does the result reveal the tangaroa flow structures using streamlines expanded into surfaces with the Ribbon filter?
+1. Overall Visualization Goal: Does the result match the ground truth visualization of tangaroa flow structures using ribbon surfaces?
 
-2. Streamline Seeding: Are streamlines correctly seeded from a Point Cloud centered at [81.6814, 80.708, 23.5093] with radius 29.9, and is the seed sphere hidden?
+2. Flow Surface Patterns: Do the ribbon surfaces show similar flow patterns and structures as the ground truth?
 
-3. Ribbon Visualization: Are the streamlines rendered with the Ribbon filter, set to width 0.3, with Display representation as Surface, effectively showing flow surfaces?
+3. Surface Coverage: Is the spatial distribution and coverage of the flow surfaces similar to the ground truth?
+
+4. Visual Appearance: Do the ribbon surfaces appear similar in width and structure to the ground truth?

main/tgc-velocity_contour/visualization_goals.txt

@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
-1) Slice at z=32 colored by magnitude, similar pattern compared to groundtruth
-2) Viridis colormap on slice
-3) Contour lines at specified values, similar pattern compared to groundtruth
-4) White contour lines
-5) Color bar labeled 'Velocity Magnitude'
-6) Light gray background, Top-down camera, Output resolution 1024x1024
+1. Overall Visualization Goal: Does the result match the ground truth slice and contour visualization of the TGC velocity field?
+
+2. Slice Pattern: Does the colored slice show similar patterns and structures as the ground truth?
+
+3. Contour Lines: Are the contour lines positioned and shaped similarly to the ground truth?
+
+4. Color Mapping: Is the color distribution on the slice visually similar to the ground truth?

main/tgc-velocity_volvis/visualization_goals.txt

@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
-1) Volume rendering applied, generally similar to groundtruth
-2) Viridis colormap
-3) Gradual opacity transfer function
-4) Color bar labeled 'Velocity Magnitude'
-5) Dark gray background, Isometric camera, Output resolution 1024x1024
+1. Overall Visualization Goal: Does the result match the ground truth volume rendering of the TGC velocity field magnitude?
+
+2. Volume Structure: Are the internal structures and features visible in the volume rendering similar to the ground truth?
+
+3. Opacity Distribution: Does the transparency/opacity distribution appear similar to the ground truth, showing the same depth and internal features?
+
+4. Color Mapping: Is the color distribution throughout the volume visually similar to the ground truth?

main/trl-velocity_isosurface/visualization_goals.txt

@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
-1) Isosurface extraction at magnitude=0.8, with similar pattern compared to groundtruth
-2) Isosurface colored by vx component
-3) Cool to Warm colormap
-4) Color bar labeled 'Vx Component'
-5) Dark background, Isometric camera, Output resolution 1024x1024
+1. Overall Visualization Goal: Does the result match the ground truth isosurface visualization of the TRL velocity field?
+
+2. Isosurface Structure: Does the isosurface show similar topology and shape as the ground truth?
+
+3. Surface Features: Are key features and structures on the isosurface similar to the ground truth?
+
+4. Color Mapping: Is the color distribution across the isosurface visually similar to the ground truth?

main/trl-velocity_timeline/visualization_goals.txt

@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
-1) Time-varying vector field handling (256x128x128 grid), Streamline generation from line seed for each timestep
-2) Line seed along z-axis at x=128, y=64, 50 seed points from z=20 to z=108
-3) Bidirectional tracing with max length 150, Tube rendering with radius 0.5
-4) Spectral color-coded temporal progression
-5) Spectral colormap for magnitude, Color bar with label 'Velocity Magnitude'
-6) Dark background (RGB: 0.0, 0.0, 0.02), Oblique camera view (azimuth 45, elevation 20), Output resolution 1024x1024
+1. Overall Visualization Goal: Does the result match the ground truth timeline visualization of the TRL velocity field?
+
+2. Timeline Patterns: Do the timelines show similar trajectories and temporal evolution as the ground truth?
+
+3. Timeline Coverage: Is the spatial distribution and density of timelines similar to the ground truth?
+
+4. Color Mapping: Is the color distribution along timelines visually similar to the ground truth?

main/vortex/visualization_goals.txt

@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
-1. Overall Visualization Goal: How well does the result present a clear iso-surface rendering of the vortex scalar field at value −0.2?
+1. Overall Visualization Goal: Does the result match the ground truth isosurface rendering of the vortex scalar field?
 
-2. Contour Appearance: Is the contour rendered with Solid Color set to beige and made the only visible object in the pipeline?
+2. Isosurface Structure: Does the isosurface show the same vortex structure and topology as the ground truth?
 
-3. Lighting & Shading: Are Ambient Occlusion and a directional head light (Coords = Camera, Intensity = 0.2) applied?
+3. Surface Appearance: Does the surface color and shading appear similar to the ground truth?
+
+4. Visualization Clarity: Are the vortex features clearly visible and comparable to the ground truth?