| { |
| "task_id": "reptile_005", |
| "domain": "REPTILE_DATABASE", |
| "autonomy_type": "ordered table", |
| "oracle_output_cardinality": 2, |
| "instruction": "I am checking a synonymization record in the current Naja species list that involves an early Sri Lankan museum name, and I want to organize the key information from the accepted side and the contested-name side into a two-row comparison table. First, in the current Naja list, locate the contested-name record associated with Sri Lanka. Then verify its recent-use evidence, the database's final treatment, the correction concerning lectotype assignment, the restricted type locality, and the holotype information for the contested name itself. Finally, output a two-row comparison table with columns rank|name_role|name|status_or_evidence|specimen_role|specimen_code|supporting_note. Row 1 should be ACCEPTED_NAME and give the accepted name, final status, valid lectotype, and restricted type locality. Row 2 should be CONTESTED_NAME and give the contested name, recent-use evidence, holotype, and the corrected invalid lectotype claim.", |
| "start_url": "https://reptile-database.reptarium.cz/advanced_search?genus=Naja&submit=Search", |
| "output_format": "Output a two-row comparison table with columns rank|name_role|name|status_or_evidence|specimen_role|specimen_code|supporting_note.", |
| "oracle_answer": "1|ACCEPTED_NAME|Naja naja|SUBJECTIVE_JUNIOR_SYNONYM_OF_NAJA_NAJA|VALID_LECTOTYPE|ZMB 2796|restricted type locality: Sri Lanka\n2|CONTESTED_NAME|Naja polyocellata|SHI et al. 2022+SILVA et al. 2023|HOLOTYPE|BMNH 1946.1.18.50|invalid lectotype claim: NRM (= NHR) Lin-90", |
| "metadata": { |
| "State-Gated Retrieval": [ |
| "Within the current Naja list, identify the Sri Lanka contested-name branch: the name was recently reused as a distinct valid name, but the database now explicitly merges it back into the accepted name.", |
| "On the current Naja naja page, read the recent-use evidence, final synonym status, lectotype correction, restricted type locality, and the holotype information for the contested name itself.", |
| "The final output must organize the ACCEPTED_NAME side and the CONTESTED_NAME side into a two-row comparison table." |
| ], |
| "dependency_type": "Data + Control", |
| "intra_chain": true, |
| "inter_chain": true, |
| "data_dependency": [ |
| "the current Naja species list and the Naja naja page yield the Sri Lanka contested-name branch, recent-use citations, and the accepted-name context", |
| "comment, Types, and type-comment blocks yield the final synonym treatment plus the valid and invalid lectotype assignments and the contested-name holotype", |
| "final rows are produced only after the accepted-name side and the contested-name side are reconciled on the current Naja naja page" |
| ], |
| "control_dependency": [ |
| "recent-use evidence for Naja polyocellata must be interpreted together with the current final synonym treatment shown on that page", |
| "lectotype status must be fixed from the combined Types and type-comment evidence rather than from a single provisional assignment", |
| "the accepted-name and contested-name rows are emitted together only after final status, type locality, and specimen roles are fixed" |
| ], |
| "freeze": { |
| "historical_window": "the objectively existing taxa in the Sri Lanka Naja branch, using current Reptile Database comment, Types, and type-comment blocks as nearly objective and highly stable reference information" |
| }, |
| "answer_type": "multi-row ordered table" |
| }, |
| "rubric": { |
| "inclusion_conditions": [ |
| "Within the current Naja list, identify the Sri Lanka contested-name record: the name was recently reused in the literature as a distinct valid name, but the database now explicitly states that it should still be merged into the accepted name.", |
| "On the current Naja naja page, the result must jointly recover the recent-use evidence, final synonym status, lectotype correction, restricted type locality, and the holotype information for the contested name itself.", |
| "The final output must organize the ACCEPTED_NAME side and the CONTESTED_NAME side into a two-row comparison table." |
| ], |
| "exclusion_conditions": [ |
| "Exclude results that treat the recently revived contested name as the current accepted name.", |
| "Exclude results that stop at the Wallach 2014 lectotype designation and do not continue to the later comment and type-comment correction.", |
| "Exclude results that fail to output both the restricted type locality and the contested-name holotype." |
| ], |
| "normalization": { |
| "field_separator": "|", |
| "record_separator": "\n", |
| "header_row": "omit the header row; emit data rows only", |
| "schema": [ |
| "rank", |
| "name_role", |
| "name", |
| "status_or_evidence", |
| "specimen_role", |
| "specimen_code", |
| "supporting_note" |
| ], |
| "rank": "emit 1 for ACCEPTED_NAME and 2 for CONTESTED_NAME", |
| "name_role": [ |
| "ACCEPTED_NAME", |
| "CONTESTED_NAME" |
| ], |
| "name_fields": "use the current binomial spellings exactly", |
| "specimen_code_normalization": "preserve museum abbreviations, spaces, parentheses, and specimen punctuation exactly as the page shows", |
| "sorting_or_selection": "emit rows in the fixed order ACCEPTED_NAME then CONTESTED_NAME" |
| } |
| } |
| } |
|
|
