{
  "task_id": "reptile_005",
  "domain": "REPTILE_DATABASE",
  "autonomy_type": "ordered table",
  "oracle_output_cardinality": 2,
  "instruction": "I am checking a synonymization record in the current Naja species list that involves an early Sri Lankan museum name, and I want to organize the key information from the accepted side and the contested-name side into a two-row comparison table. First, in the current Naja list, locate the contested-name record associated with Sri Lanka. Then verify its recent-use evidence, the database's final treatment, the correction concerning lectotype assignment, the restricted type locality, and the holotype information for the contested name itself. Finally, output a two-row comparison table with columns rank|name_role|name|status_or_evidence|specimen_role|specimen_code|supporting_note. Row 1 should be ACCEPTED_NAME and give the accepted name, final status, valid lectotype, and restricted type locality. Row 2 should be CONTESTED_NAME and give the contested name, recent-use evidence, holotype, and the corrected invalid lectotype claim.",
  "start_url": "https://reptile-database.reptarium.cz/advanced_search?genus=Naja&submit=Search",
  "output_format": "Output a two-row comparison table with columns rank|name_role|name|status_or_evidence|specimen_role|specimen_code|supporting_note.",
  "oracle_answer": "1|ACCEPTED_NAME|Naja naja|SUBJECTIVE_JUNIOR_SYNONYM_OF_NAJA_NAJA|VALID_LECTOTYPE|ZMB 2796|restricted type locality: Sri Lanka\n2|CONTESTED_NAME|Naja polyocellata|SHI et al. 2022+SILVA et al. 2023|HOLOTYPE|BMNH 1946.1.18.50|invalid lectotype claim: NRM (= NHR) Lin-90",
  "metadata": {
    "State-Gated Retrieval": [
      "Within the current Naja list, identify the Sri Lanka contested-name branch: the name was recently reused as a distinct valid name, but the database now explicitly merges it back into the accepted name.",
      "On the current Naja naja page, read the recent-use evidence, final synonym status, lectotype correction, restricted type locality, and the holotype information for the contested name itself.",
      "The final output must organize the ACCEPTED_NAME side and the CONTESTED_NAME side into a two-row comparison table."
    ],
    "dependency_type": "Data + Control",
    "intra_chain": true,
    "inter_chain": true,
    "data_dependency": [
      "the current Naja species list and the Naja naja page yield the Sri Lanka contested-name branch, recent-use citations, and the accepted-name context",
      "comment, Types, and type-comment blocks yield the final synonym treatment plus the valid and invalid lectotype assignments and the contested-name holotype",
      "final rows are produced only after the accepted-name side and the contested-name side are reconciled on the current Naja naja page"
    ],
    "control_dependency": [
      "recent-use evidence for Naja polyocellata must be interpreted together with the current final synonym treatment shown on that page",
      "lectotype status must be fixed from the combined Types and type-comment evidence rather than from a single provisional assignment",
      "the accepted-name and contested-name rows are emitted together only after final status, type locality, and specimen roles are fixed"
    ],
    "freeze": {
      "historical_window": "the objectively existing taxa in the Sri Lanka Naja branch, using current Reptile Database comment, Types, and type-comment blocks as nearly objective and highly stable reference information"
    },
    "answer_type": "multi-row ordered table"
  },
  "rubric": {
    "inclusion_conditions": [
      "Within the current Naja list, identify the Sri Lanka contested-name record: the name was recently reused in the literature as a distinct valid name, but the database now explicitly states that it should still be merged into the accepted name.",
      "On the current Naja naja page, the result must jointly recover the recent-use evidence, final synonym status, lectotype correction, restricted type locality, and the holotype information for the contested name itself.",
      "The final output must organize the ACCEPTED_NAME side and the CONTESTED_NAME side into a two-row comparison table."
    ],
    "exclusion_conditions": [
      "Exclude results that treat the recently revived contested name as the current accepted name.",
      "Exclude results that stop at the Wallach 2014 lectotype designation and do not continue to the later comment and type-comment correction.",
      "Exclude results that fail to output both the restricted type locality and the contested-name holotype."
    ],
    "normalization": {
      "field_separator": "|",
      "record_separator": "\n",
      "header_row": "omit the header row; emit data rows only",
      "schema": [
        "rank",
        "name_role",
        "name",
        "status_or_evidence",
        "specimen_role",
        "specimen_code",
        "supporting_note"
      ],
      "rank": "emit 1 for ACCEPTED_NAME and 2 for CONTESTED_NAME",
      "name_role": [
        "ACCEPTED_NAME",
        "CONTESTED_NAME"
      ],
      "name_fields": "use the current binomial spellings exactly",
      "specimen_code_normalization": "preserve museum abbreviations, spaces, parentheses, and specimen punctuation exactly as the page shows",
      "sorting_or_selection": "emit rows in the fixed order ACCEPTED_NAME then CONTESTED_NAME"
    }
  }
}