version stringclasses 1
value | hypothesis stringlengths 9 248 | hypothesis_formula stringlengths 3 39 | facts stringlengths 0 2.95k | facts_formula stringlengths 0 909 | proofs sequencelengths 0 1 | proofs_formula sequencelengths 0 1 | negative_hypothesis stringlengths 10 190 ⌀ | negative_hypothesis_formula stringlengths 3 37 ⌀ | negative_proofs sequencelengths 0 1 | negative_original_tree_depth int64 0 25 ⌀ | original_tree_depth int64 1 3 | depth int64 0 3 ⌀ | num_formula_distractors int64 0 22 | num_translation_distractors int64 0 0 | num_all_distractors int64 0 22 | proof_label stringclasses 3
values | negative_proof_label stringclasses 2
values | world_assump_label stringclasses 3
values | negative_world_assump_label stringclasses 2
values | prompt_serial stringlengths 74 3.13k | proof_serial stringlengths 11 720 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.3 | Creeps but notstrafing Glaucium occurs. | ({D} & ¬{C}) | fact1: Solubleness does not happens. fact2: That hooking minim does not occurs causes that wangling bumptiousness does not happens. fact3: If denting happens then hypercatalectic occurs and detribalizing Cirsium does not occurs. fact4: That stargazing does not occurs yields that Stoning and wangling bumptiousness happe... | fact1: ¬{FM} fact2: ¬{A} -> ¬{B} fact3: {L} -> ({K} & ¬{J}) fact4: ¬{F} -> ({E} & {B}) fact5: ¬{FD} -> ¬{HK} fact6: {A} -> ({D} & ¬{C}) fact7: ¬({BR} & ¬{JH}) fact8: ¬({IB} & ¬{AS}) fact9: ¬{B} -> ¬({D} & {C}) fact10: ¬({AU} & ¬{EU}) fact11: ¬({D} & {C}) fact12: {H} -> (¬{F} & {G}) fact13: ¬{HE} -> ¬({AU} & ¬{CH}) fact... | [
"fact2 & fact14 -> int1: Wangling bumptiousness does not happens.;"
] | [
"fact2 & fact14 -> int1: ¬{B};"
] | Creeps but notstrafing Glaucium occurs. | ({D} & ¬{C}) | [] | 10 | 2 | null | 16 | 0 | 16 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: Solubleness does not happens. fact2: That hooking minim does not occurs causes that wangling bumptiousness does not happens. fact3: If denting happens then hypercatalectic occurs and detribalizing Cirsium does not occurs. fact4: That stargazing does not occurs yields that Stoning and wangling bumptious... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | There exists somebody such that if that thing is not plumbable then the one is nonmoving and the thing is not autologous. | (Ex): ¬{A}x -> ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) | fact1: Somebody arrives Valerianella and is not plumbable if the thing does not divert. fact2: The malacologist is nonmoving and non-autologous if the person is plumbable. fact3: There exists some person such that if the one is not plumbable the one is nonmoving. | fact1: (x): ¬{GU}x -> ({IK}x & ¬{A}x) fact2: {A}{aa} -> ({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) fact3: (Ex): ¬{A}x -> {AA}x | [] | [] | The Swede arrives Valerianella but this thing is not plumbable if the thing does not divert. | ¬{GU}{ds} -> ({IK}{ds} & ¬{A}{ds}) | [
"fact4 -> hypothesis;"
] | 1 | 1 | null | 3 | 0 | 3 | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | $facts$ = fact1: Somebody arrives Valerianella and is not plumbable if the thing does not divert. fact2: The malacologist is nonmoving and non-autologous if the person is plumbable. fact3: There exists some person such that if the one is not plumbable the one is nonmoving. ; $hypothesis$ = There exists somebody such th... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | Elbowing does not happens. | ¬{C} | fact1: If that reassurance happens and mucousness happens is wrong then that reassurance does not happens is true. fact2: If that gastroscopy or astigmaticness or both occurs is wrong that centeringness happens hold. fact3: That internalising Orthilia does not happens is prevented by reassurance. fact4: The fact that g... | fact1: ¬({D} & {F}) -> ¬{D} fact2: ¬({AA} v {AB}) -> {B} fact3: {D} -> {DO} fact4: ¬({AA} v ¬{AB}) fact5: {A} -> {C} fact6: ¬({DC} v ¬{CB}) fact7: {DE} fact8: {IF} fact9: ¬({AA} v ¬{AB}) -> {B} fact10: {AB} fact11: {E} -> ({C} v ¬{D}) fact12: ¬{D} -> ¬(¬{A} & ¬{B}) fact13: {IC} | [
"fact9 & fact4 -> int1: Centeringness occurs.;"
] | [
"fact9 & fact4 -> int1: {B};"
] | Anisogamousness occurs. | {AR} | [] | 6 | 3 | null | 10 | 0 | 10 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: If that reassurance happens and mucousness happens is wrong then that reassurance does not happens is true. fact2: If that gastroscopy or astigmaticness or both occurs is wrong that centeringness happens hold. fact3: That internalising Orthilia does not happens is prevented by reassurance. fact4: The f... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | Reconnoitring occurs. | {B} | fact1: Satanicness does not happens if conducting happens. fact2: Incommodiousness is prevented by that detente does not happens and behavioralness does not occurs. fact3: Gracefulness happens. fact4: Septation prevents that conducting does not occurs. fact5: If junketinging Clive does not occurs then the fact that bot... | fact1: {L} -> ¬{K} fact2: (¬{AC} & ¬{AD}) -> ¬{AB} fact3: {AE} fact4: {M} -> {L} fact5: ¬{O} -> ({M} & {N}) fact6: {P} -> ¬{O} fact7: {T} -> ({S} & ¬{R}) fact8: ¬({I} & ¬{J}) -> ¬{H} fact9: ¬{F} -> ({D} & {E}) fact10: ¬{U} -> {T} fact11: {AE} -> (¬{AC} & ¬{AD}) fact12: ¬{H} -> (¬{F} & ¬{G}) fact13: ¬({U} & {AA}) -> ¬{U... | [
"fact14 & fact20 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact14 & fact20 -> hypothesis;"
] | Reconnoitring does not happens. | ¬{B} | [
"fact36 & fact32 -> int1: Detente does not happens and behavioralness does not occurs.; fact35 & int1 -> int2: Incommodiousness does not happens.; fact30 & int2 -> int3: The fact that gargling and spirt occurs is false.; fact38 & int3 -> int4: Gargling does not happens.; fact39 & int4 -> int5: Castling trainload oc... | 22 | 1 | 1 | 20 | 0 | 20 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: Satanicness does not happens if conducting happens. fact2: Incommodiousness is prevented by that detente does not happens and behavioralness does not occurs. fact3: Gracefulness happens. fact4: Septation prevents that conducting does not occurs. fact5: If junketinging Clive does not occurs then the fac... | fact14 & fact20 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | There is some man such that that the man is not aerodynamic and the one does fry supremacism does not hold. | (Ex): ¬(¬{B}x & {C}x) | fact1: That this Coward is aerodynamic and does fry supremacism does not hold. fact2: If there is somebody such that it is not a kind of a crossbones then that this Coward is non-aerodynamic one that fries supremacism is incorrect. fact3: If something is a crossbones the fact that it does not apply and the one confront... | fact1: ¬({B}{a} & {C}{a}) fact2: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬(¬{B}{a} & {C}{a}) fact3: (x): {A}x -> ¬(¬{HC}x & {GC}x) fact4: (Ex): (¬{B}x & {C}x) fact5: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬({B}{a} & {C}{a}) fact6: (Ex): ¬{A}x | [
"fact6 & fact2 -> int1: That this Coward is non-aerodynamic one that fries supremacism is not true.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact6 & fact2 -> int1: ¬(¬{B}{a} & {C}{a}); int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | The fact that that ramona does not apply but the one does confront does not hold. | ¬(¬{HC}{eu} & {GC}{eu}) | [
"fact7 -> int2: If that ramona is a crossbones the fact that that ramona does not apply but it confronts is false.;"
] | 4 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 4 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: That this Coward is aerodynamic and does fry supremacism does not hold. fact2: If there is somebody such that it is not a kind of a crossbones then that this Coward is non-aerodynamic one that fries supremacism is incorrect. fact3: If something is a crossbones the fact that it does not apply and the on... | fact6 & fact2 -> int1: That this Coward is non-aerodynamic one that fries supremacism is not true.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | The fact that everyone is ratty is incorrect. | ¬((x): {A}x) | fact1: That somebody is not a premise and the one is not inharmonious is incorrect if the one is joyful. fact2: If someone is not ratty then the thing is a kind of a charge. fact3: There is nobody that is non-joyful man that is not fine. fact4: If that someone is not joyful and the one is not fine does not hold that th... | fact1: (x): {D}x -> ¬(¬{B}x & ¬{C}x) fact2: (x): ¬{A}x -> {CM}x fact3: (x): ¬(¬{D}x & ¬{E}x) fact4: (x): ¬(¬{D}x & ¬{E}x) -> {D}x fact5: (x): {A}x fact6: (x): {BF}x | [
"fact5 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact5 -> hypothesis;"
] | Everybody is a charge. | (x): {CM}x | [
"fact8 -> int1: That that phenacomys is not a kind of a premise and the one is not inharmonious does not hold if that phenacomys is joyful.; fact9 -> int2: If the fact that that phenacomys is not joyful and not fine is incorrect then she is joyful.; fact7 -> int3: That that phenacomys is both not joyful and not fin... | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 5 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: That somebody is not a premise and the one is not inharmonious is incorrect if the one is joyful. fact2: If someone is not ratty then the thing is a kind of a charge. fact3: There is nobody that is non-joyful man that is not fine. fact4: If that someone is not joyful and the one is not fine does not ho... | fact5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | This republican is closest. | {C}{b} | fact1: If this scrapbook is not a kind of a roofed this republican is closest and is a Baccharis. fact2: If this scrapbook is a roofed then this republican is not closest. fact3: If someone is not a Wilkinson the one is not a roofed. fact4: Something is not uncrossed if that the thing is a doddering and/or a sliding is... | fact1: ¬{B}{a} -> ({C}{b} & {A}{b}) fact2: {B}{a} -> ¬{C}{b} fact3: (x): ¬{D}x -> ¬{B}x fact4: (x): ¬({H}x v {I}x) -> ¬{G}x fact5: {L}{c} -> (¬{J}{c} & {K}{c}) fact6: (x): ¬{G}x -> (¬{F}x & ¬{E}x) fact7: ¬{J}{c} -> ¬({H}{a} v {I}{a}) fact8: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) fact9: {A}{a} fact10: ¬{C}{a} fact11: (x): (¬{F}x & ¬{E}x) ->... | [
"fact8 -> int1: This scrapbook is a roofed.; int1 & fact2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact8 -> int1: {B}{a}; int1 & fact2 -> hypothesis;"
] | This republican is closest. | {C}{b} | [
"fact17 -> int2: This scrapbook is not a roofed if this scrapbook is not a Wilkinson.; fact15 -> int3: If this scrapbook is not a Puebla and the one does not revere Basiliscus then this scrapbook is not a kind of a Wilkinson.; fact13 -> int4: If this scrapbook is not uncrossed then that this scrapbook is not a kind... | 9 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 0 | 9 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: If this scrapbook is not a kind of a roofed this republican is closest and is a Baccharis. fact2: If this scrapbook is a roofed then this republican is not closest. fact3: If someone is not a Wilkinson the one is not a roofed. fact4: Something is not uncrossed if that the thing is a doddering and/or a ... | fact8 -> int1: This scrapbook is a roofed.; int1 & fact2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | If this pterion is beneficent the person does not form Hymenogastrales and is beneficent. | {C}{a} -> (¬{A}{a} & {C}{a}) | fact1: This pterion is not presbyopic but the one is insurrectionary. fact2: This tuxedo is not a cat but the thing is a Rupicapra. fact3: This pterion does not form Hymenogastrales and is a cat. fact4: If that despot is non-parheliacal that the one is both not unreportable and a waterproofed is not right. fact5: The t... | fact1: (¬{GU}{a} & {JB}{a}) fact2: (¬{B}{fr} & {HD}{fr}) fact3: (¬{A}{a} & {B}{a}) fact4: ¬{H}{b} -> ¬(¬{G}{b} & {F}{b}) fact5: (¬{A}{fp} & {CC}{fp}) fact6: ¬{D}{b} -> ({C}{a} v {E}{a}) fact7: {B}{a} fact8: {C}{a} -> ({A}{a} & {C}{a}) fact9: {C}{fj} -> (¬{HB}{fj} & {C}{fj}) fact10: (x): {C}x -> {B}x fact11: {B}{b} -> {... | [
"fact3 -> int1: This pterion does not form Hymenogastrales.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that this pterion is beneficent.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: This pterion does not form Hymenogastrales but the one is beneficent.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact3 -> int1: ¬{A}{a}; void -> assump1: {C}{a}; int1 & assump1 -> int2: (¬{A}{a} & {C}{a}); [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | This Samoyed is admissible and does form Hymenogastrales. | (¬{GF}{ic} & {A}{ic}) | [
"fact15 -> int3: That if the fact that this Samoyed is beneficent hold this Samoyed is a cat is correct.; fact18 -> int4: That despot does not compartmentalise haggling if the fact that the thing is not unreportable and is a kind of a waterproofed is incorrect.;"
] | 6 | 3 | 3 | 13 | 0 | 13 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: This pterion is not presbyopic but the one is insurrectionary. fact2: This tuxedo is not a cat but the thing is a Rupicapra. fact3: This pterion does not form Hymenogastrales and is a cat. fact4: If that despot is non-parheliacal that the one is both not unreportable and a waterproofed is not right. fa... | fact3 -> int1: This pterion does not form Hymenogastrales.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that this pterion is beneficent.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: This pterion does not form Hymenogastrales but the one is beneficent.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | That that this antique is not ambitious and not obtrusive is wrong is right. | ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) | fact1: This antique destines Mankato and/or the one is anticancer. fact2: The fact that this antique is ambitious and the thing is unobtrusive is wrong. fact3: That that muton is not universalist and is ambitious is false. fact4: If this undershrub is a Myrmeleontidae this undershrub is unobtrusive. fact5: That diptych... | fact1: ({C}{aa} v {B}{aa}) fact2: ¬({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) fact3: ¬(¬{HK}{ec} & {AA}{ec}) fact4: {HA}{ch} -> {AB}{ch} fact5: ({E}{a} & {D}{a}) fact6: {F}{a} -> ({D}{a} & ¬{E}{a}) fact7: ({AU}{aa} v {AA}{aa}) fact8: (x): {A}x -> ¬({AA}x & {AB}x) fact9: (x): ¬({C}x & {B}x) -> ¬{A}x fact10: {C}{aa} -> {A}{aa} fact11: (x): {... | [
"fact14 -> int1: That this antique is not ambitious but the thing is unobtrusive does not hold if it is a kind of a Cowpens.; fact13 & fact10 & fact1 -> int2: This antique is a Cowpens.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact14 -> int1: {A}{aa} -> ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}); fact13 & fact10 & fact1 -> int2: {A}{aa}; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | This antique is not ambitious but that is unobtrusive. | (¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) | [
"fact22 -> int3: If this antique is not a Cowpens then that person is both not ambitious and unobtrusive.; fact21 -> int4: This antique is not a Cowpens if that this antique destines Mankato and is anticancer is not true.;"
] | 6 | 2 | 2 | 15 | 0 | 15 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: This antique destines Mankato and/or the one is anticancer. fact2: The fact that this antique is ambitious and the thing is unobtrusive is wrong. fact3: That that muton is not universalist and is ambitious is false. fact4: If this undershrub is a Myrmeleontidae this undershrub is unobtrusive. fact5: Th... | fact14 -> int1: That this antique is not ambitious but the thing is unobtrusive does not hold if it is a kind of a Cowpens.; fact13 & fact10 & fact1 -> int2: This antique is a Cowpens.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | Let's assume that that appendage is a ignominiousness. | {A}{a} | fact1: That that broth does not merchandise stooping but the one is unshrinkable does not hold. fact2: If that somebody is a ignominiousness and merchandises stooping is wrong the person is not a Haman. fact3: That appendage does not meander and the thing does not floor Onopordum. fact4: That that broth is not a ignomi... | fact1: ¬(¬{B}{b} & {IH}{b}) fact2: (x): ¬({A}x & {B}x) -> ¬{AB}x fact3: (¬{JA}{a} & ¬{D}{a}) fact4: (¬{A}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}) fact5: (x): ¬{D}x fact6: {A}{a} -> ¬(¬{AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}) fact7: ¬{B}{b} -> (¬{AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}) fact8: {B}{b} -> ¬(¬{AA}{a} & ¬{A}{a}) fact9: ¬{AB}{b} fact10: ¬{A}{b} fact11: {B}{b} -> ¬(¬{AB}{a} &... | [
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that that appendage is a ignominiousness.; fact6 & assump1 -> int1: That that broth is not a kind of a homeostasis and the one is not a Haman is wrong.; fact7 & fact13 -> int2: That broth is not a homeostasis and not a Haman.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & i... | [
"void -> assump1: {A}{a}; fact6 & assump1 -> int1: ¬(¬{AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}); fact7 & fact13 -> int2: (¬{AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}); int1 & int2 -> int3: #F#; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | That appendage is not a Haman. | ¬{AB}{a} | [
"fact17 -> int4: If the fact that that appendage is a kind of a ignominiousness that merchandises stooping is wrong then that appendage is not a Haman.;"
] | 4 | 3 | 3 | 13 | 0 | 13 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: That that broth does not merchandise stooping but the one is unshrinkable does not hold. fact2: If that somebody is a ignominiousness and merchandises stooping is wrong the person is not a Haman. fact3: That appendage does not meander and the thing does not floor Onopordum. fact4: That that broth is no... | void -> assump1: Let's assume that that appendage is a ignominiousness.; fact6 & assump1 -> int1: That that broth is not a kind of a homeostasis and the one is not a Haman is wrong.; fact7 & fact13 -> int2: That broth is not a homeostasis and not a Haman.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -... |
0.3 | This tiller is cartographical. | {D}{a} | fact1: There exists something such that the thing is not placable. fact2: If that something is bulbed but the thing is not a kind of a sonata is wrong then the thing is not cartographical. fact3: If there exists something such that the thing is implacable then that this tiller is bulbed and is not a sonata does not hol... | fact1: (Ex): {A}x fact2: (x): ¬({B}x & ¬{C}x) -> ¬{D}x fact3: (x): {A}x -> ¬({B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) | [
"fact1 & fact3 -> int1: That this tiller is bulbed but not a sonata is incorrect.; fact2 -> int2: This tiller is not cartographical if the fact that the one is a kind of bulbed thing that is not a sonata is wrong.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact1 & fact3 -> int1: ¬({B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}); fact2 -> int2: ¬({B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) -> ¬{D}{a}; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null | [] | null | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | DISPROVED | null | DISPROVED | null | $facts$ = fact1: There exists something such that the thing is not placable. fact2: If that something is bulbed but the thing is not a kind of a sonata is wrong then the thing is not cartographical. fact3: If there exists something such that the thing is implacable then that this tiller is bulbed and is not a sonata do... | fact1 & fact3 -> int1: That this tiller is bulbed but not a sonata is incorrect.; fact2 -> int2: This tiller is not cartographical if the fact that the one is a kind of bulbed thing that is not a sonata is wrong.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | Nonionisedness does not happens. | ¬{B} | fact1: That prank does not occurs brings about that nonionisedness does not occurs but smothering happens. fact2: If detraining happens that backwardness does not occurs and swoop does not occurs does not hold. fact3: Nonionisedness occurs if the fact that backwardness does not occurs and swoop does not occurs is not c... | fact1: ¬{D} -> (¬{B} & {C}) fact2: {A} -> ¬(¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) fact3: ¬(¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) -> {B} fact4: {A} | [
"fact2 & fact4 -> int1: The fact that backwardness does not occurs and swoop does not happens does not hold.; int1 & fact3 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact2 & fact4 -> int1: ¬(¬{AA} & ¬{AB}); int1 & fact3 -> hypothesis;"
] | Rails occurs. | {FH} | [] | 6 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: That prank does not occurs brings about that nonionisedness does not occurs but smothering happens. fact2: If detraining happens that backwardness does not occurs and swoop does not occurs does not hold. fact3: Nonionisedness occurs if the fact that backwardness does not occurs and swoop does not occur... | fact2 & fact4 -> int1: The fact that backwardness does not occurs and swoop does not happens does not hold.; int1 & fact3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | This Gantrisin does not trespass ruggedness. | ¬{C}{aa} | fact1: That precordium panics vaginitis and the thing is catkinate if that granule is non-achromatinic. fact2: Someone is not achromatinic if the one is a kind of a Khios and does not stay mirth. fact3: That that granule is unshapely and the one is a Jotun is wrong if the fact that that granule does not ammonify muscul... | fact1: ¬{L}{e} -> ({J}{d} & {K}{d}) fact2: (x): ({M}x & ¬{N}x) -> ¬{L}x fact3: ¬{Q}{e} -> ¬({O}{e} & {P}{e}) fact4: (x): {D}x -> ¬({A}x & ¬{B}x) fact5: ¬{D}{e} -> ¬(¬{B}{e} & {C}{e}) fact6: (x): ¬({O}x & {P}x) -> ¬{N}x fact7: {E}{b} -> {D}{a} fact8: ¬(¬{D}{aa} & {A}{aa}) fact9: (x): ¬{B}x -> {C}x fact10: ¬{Q}{e} fact11... | [
"fact9 -> int1: This Gantrisin trespasses ruggedness if he does not universalise Kabbala.;"
] | [
"fact9 -> int1: ¬{B}{aa} -> {C}{aa};"
] | This Gantrisin does not trespass ruggedness. | ¬{C}{aa} | [
"fact28 -> int2: If this tunnel is a kind of a robed then the fact that this tunnel is a Iranian but the one does not universalise Kabbala does not hold.; fact26 -> int3: If that precordium does panic vaginitis the fact that the one does not perforate thirteenth and is not a forlornness is incorrect.; fact24 -> int... | 14 | 2 | null | 16 | 0 | 16 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: That precordium panics vaginitis and the thing is catkinate if that granule is non-achromatinic. fact2: Someone is not achromatinic if the one is a kind of a Khios and does not stay mirth. fact3: That that granule is unshapely and the one is a Jotun is wrong if the fact that that granule does not ammon... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | That fudge is not lengthwise. | ¬{D}{b} | fact1: A timelessness does expiate dollop. fact2: If this badger does not analyse Asgard this pruning does not expiate dollop but it is a spotlessness. fact3: This pruning does expiate dollop if the fact that this pruning does stun manufactured is correct. fact4: If some man does not expiate dollop then that it is a ti... | fact1: (x): {B}x -> {C}x fact2: ¬{F}{c} -> (¬{C}{a} & {E}{a}) fact3: {A}{a} -> {C}{a} fact4: (x): ¬{C}x -> ¬({B}x & ¬{A}x) fact5: ¬(¬{C}{c} & {D}{c}) -> ¬{C}{b} fact6: {AA}{aa} fact7: (x): {D}x -> {A}x fact8: {A}{a} -> {B}{b} fact9: (x): {C}x -> {D}x fact10: (¬{I}{c} v {H}{c}) -> ¬{G}{c} fact11: {A}{a} fact12: (x): ¬{G... | [
"fact8 & fact11 -> int1: That fudge is a timelessness.; fact1 -> int2: That fudge expiates dollop if that fudge is a timelessness.; int1 & int2 -> int3: That fudge expiates dollop.; fact9 -> int4: That fudge is lengthwise if the one expiates dollop.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact8 & fact11 -> int1: {B}{b}; fact1 -> int2: {B}{b} -> {C}{b}; int1 & int2 -> int3: {C}{b}; fact9 -> int4: {C}{b} -> {D}{b}; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;"
] | This pruning is a kind of a timelessness. | {B}{a} | [] | 6 | 3 | 3 | 11 | 0 | 11 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: A timelessness does expiate dollop. fact2: If this badger does not analyse Asgard this pruning does not expiate dollop but it is a spotlessness. fact3: This pruning does expiate dollop if the fact that this pruning does stun manufactured is correct. fact4: If some man does not expiate dollop then that ... | fact8 & fact11 -> int1: That fudge is a timelessness.; fact1 -> int2: That fudge expiates dollop if that fudge is a timelessness.; int1 & int2 -> int3: That fudge expiates dollop.; fact9 -> int4: That fudge is lengthwise if the one expiates dollop.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | The fact that both Nice and deletion happens is wrong. | ¬({B} & {C}) | fact1: If feathering Meissner happens the fact that reconnoitering hernia does not occurs and insecureness does not occurs is incorrect. fact2: Feathering Meissner happens. fact3: That deletion occurs and watching Cinnamomum occurs is caused by non-translationalness. fact4: If that reconnoitering hernia does not happen... | fact1: {A} -> ¬(¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) fact2: {A} fact3: ¬{E} -> ({C} & {D}) fact4: ¬(¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) -> {B} fact5: ¬{E} | [
"fact1 & fact2 -> int1: That reconnoitering hernia does not occurs and insecureness does not happens does not hold.; int1 & fact4 -> int2: Nice happens.; fact5 & fact3 -> int3: Deletion and watching Cinnamomum occurs.; int3 -> int4: Deletion happens.; int2 & int4 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact1 & fact2 -> int1: ¬(¬{AA} & ¬{AB}); int1 & fact4 -> int2: {B}; fact5 & fact3 -> int3: ({C} & {D}); int3 -> int4: {C}; int2 & int4 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null | [] | null | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | DISPROVED | null | DISPROVED | null | $facts$ = fact1: If feathering Meissner happens the fact that reconnoitering hernia does not occurs and insecureness does not occurs is incorrect. fact2: Feathering Meissner happens. fact3: That deletion occurs and watching Cinnamomum occurs is caused by non-translationalness. fact4: If that reconnoitering hernia does ... | fact1 & fact2 -> int1: That reconnoitering hernia does not occurs and insecureness does not happens does not hold.; int1 & fact4 -> int2: Nice happens.; fact5 & fact3 -> int3: Deletion and watching Cinnamomum occurs.; int3 -> int4: Deletion happens.; int2 & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | The fact that that vicinity is not a Maoism but the one pleads does not hold. | ¬(¬{A}{aa} & {B}{aa}) | fact1: The workings does not undercoat but it pleads. fact2: That vicinity is not a Maoism. fact3: Everyone is not a Maoism. fact4: There is no person that is a tense and specialises sensationalism. fact5: If this longicorn is not acrocentric then the one is both not a tense and vesical. fact6: Every man is not unconne... | fact1: (¬{IA}{be} & {B}{be}) fact2: ¬{A}{aa} fact3: (x): ¬{A}x fact4: (x): ¬({D}x & {C}x) fact5: ¬{F}{a} -> (¬{D}{a} & {E}{a}) fact6: (x): (¬{EQ}x & {CP}x) fact7: (x): (¬{D}x & {E}x) -> ¬{C}x fact8: (x): (¬{EM}x & {JJ}x) fact9: (x): ¬({D}x & {C}x) -> ¬{C}x fact10: (¬{GJ}{aa} & {JD}{aa}) | [] | [] | The fact that everybody is not a oxycephaly and the thing satellites tenner hold. | (x): (¬{U}x & {GT}x) | [
"fact12 -> int1: If that this longicorn is a tense and the one specialises sensationalism is incorrect the one does not specialises sensationalism.; fact11 -> int2: The fact that this longicorn is a kind of a tense and he does specialise sensationalism does not hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This longicorn does not sp... | 6 | 1 | null | 10 | 0 | 10 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: The workings does not undercoat but it pleads. fact2: That vicinity is not a Maoism. fact3: Everyone is not a Maoism. fact4: There is no person that is a tense and specialises sensationalism. fact5: If this longicorn is not acrocentric then the one is both not a tense and vesical. fact6: Every man is n... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | The fact that achlamydeousness does not happens is true. | ¬{C} | fact1: Non-sharpness triggers that auctorialness and/or anabioticness happens. fact2: Unsyllabicness does not occurs. fact3: Nullification occurs. fact4: Grounder occurs. fact5: Roping happens. fact6: That clacking does not happens is prevented by that unrestrainedness happens. fact7: Vandalism occurs. fact8: That Buff... | fact1: ¬{FI} -> ({DD} v {GD}) fact2: ¬{A} fact3: {HR} fact4: {HL} fact5: {CN} fact6: {AB} -> {B} fact7: {FN} fact8: {DH} -> {FF} fact9: {CB} -> {HN} fact10: ¬{AE} fact11: {B} -> {C} fact12: {AA} -> {B} | [] | [] | null | null | [] | null | 3 | null | 8 | 0 | 8 | UNKNOWN | null | UNKNOWN | null | $facts$ = fact1: Non-sharpness triggers that auctorialness and/or anabioticness happens. fact2: Unsyllabicness does not occurs. fact3: Nullification occurs. fact4: Grounder occurs. fact5: Roping happens. fact6: That clacking does not happens is prevented by that unrestrainedness happens. fact7: Vandalism occurs. fact8:... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | Joyce is photographic and/or the one is a Keynesian. | ({C}{b} v {B}{b}) | fact1: That this percolator is photographic hold. fact2: Joyce is not a discography if this agriculturalist does not fade but the one is a Bruckenthalia. fact3: Isaias is a pleating if that this quay does not contort or it is not a kind of a pleating or both does not hold. fact4: That this quay does not contort and/or ... | fact1: {C}{dm} fact2: (¬{E}{a} & {D}{a}) -> ¬{A}{b} fact3: ¬(¬{O}{f} v ¬{M}{f}) -> {M}{e} fact4: {N}{g} -> ¬(¬{O}{f} v ¬{M}{f}) fact5: ({N}{h} v {Q}{h}) fact6: ¬{A}{a} fact7: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬({C}x v {B}x) fact8: {D}{b} -> {C}{a} fact9: ¬{F}{c} -> (¬{E}{a} & {D}{a}) fact10: (x): ¬(¬{I}x & {J}x) -> {H}x fact11: {JC}{a} fa... | [] | [] | The fact that Joyce is photographic and/or the one is a Keynesian is not right. | ¬({C}{b} v {B}{b}) | [
"fact25 -> int1: That if Joyce is not a discography then that Joyce is photographic and/or the one is a Keynesian is wrong is right.; fact27 -> int2: This jabot is not antiapartheid and not appointive if this thing is a face.; fact18 -> int3: This jabot is a face if the fact that this jabot does not slot coronach a... | 12 | 2 | null | 15 | 0 | 15 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: That this percolator is photographic hold. fact2: Joyce is not a discography if this agriculturalist does not fade but the one is a Bruckenthalia. fact3: Isaias is a pleating if that this quay does not contort or it is not a kind of a pleating or both does not hold. fact4: That this quay does not conto... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | Magaly is not a staginess but the person mingles entity. | (¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) | fact1: That Magaly is not a staginess but the thing mingles entity does not hold. | fact1: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) | [
"fact1 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact1 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null | [] | null | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | DISPROVED | null | DISPROVED | null | $facts$ = fact1: That Magaly is not a staginess but the thing mingles entity does not hold. ; $hypothesis$ = Magaly is not a staginess but the person mingles entity. ; $proof$ = | fact1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | This hemopoiesis is both not a forethought and not a Katsina. | (¬{B}{a} & ¬{A}{a}) | fact1: That this hemopoiesis is not a forethought and he is not a kind of a Katsina is true if this shoulder is not a Katsina. fact2: Everyone is not a zloty. fact3: The fact that this hemopoiesis is not a forethought if this shoulder is not a forethought is right. fact4: Everyone is not a Katsina. | fact1: ¬{A}{aa} -> (¬{B}{a} & ¬{A}{a}) fact2: (x): ¬{GS}x fact3: ¬{B}{aa} -> ¬{B}{a} fact4: (x): ¬{A}x | [
"fact4 -> int1: This shoulder is not a kind of a Katsina.; int1 & fact1 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact4 -> int1: ¬{A}{aa}; int1 & fact1 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null | [] | null | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | PROVED | null | PROVED | null | $facts$ = fact1: That this hemopoiesis is not a forethought and he is not a kind of a Katsina is true if this shoulder is not a Katsina. fact2: Everyone is not a zloty. fact3: The fact that this hemopoiesis is not a forethought if this shoulder is not a forethought is right. fact4: Everyone is not a Katsina. ; $hypothe... | fact4 -> int1: This shoulder is not a kind of a Katsina.; int1 & fact1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | This careerist is subarctic. | {C}{c} | fact1: That weirdy is a Pythia. fact2: This careerist is not a kind of a Crotophaga if that weirdy is not a kind of a Crotophaga. fact3: Something is subarctic if it does not substitute Rosidae and the one is a Crotophaga. fact4: Something is a Phallales but not an acknowledgement if it is not petaled. fact5: If somebo... | fact1: {AA}{a} fact2: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬{A}{c} fact3: (x): (¬{B}x & {A}x) -> {C}x fact4: (x): ¬{F}x -> ({D}x & ¬{E}x) fact5: (x): ({B}x & {A}x) -> {C}x fact6: ({J}{d} & {H}{d}) -> ¬{H}{b} fact7: ¬{B}{b} -> ¬{B}{c} fact8: ({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact9: ¬{H}{b} -> ({G}{a} & ¬{F}{a}) fact10: (x): ¬{D}x -> (¬{A}x & {B}x) fact11: (x)... | [
"fact16 & fact8 -> int1: That birdhouse does not substitute Rosidae.; fact3 -> int2: This careerist is not non-subarctic if this careerist does not substitute Rosidae and is a kind of a Crotophaga.;"
] | [
"fact16 & fact8 -> int1: ¬{B}{b}; fact3 -> int2: (¬{B}{c} & {A}{c}) -> {C}{c};"
] | This careerist is not subarctic. | ¬{C}{c} | [
"fact21 -> int3: If this careerist is not a Crotophaga but the one substitutes Rosidae the person is not subarctic.; fact18 -> int4: This careerist is not a kind of a Crotophaga but that one substitutes Rosidae if that one is not a kind of a Phallales.; fact20 -> int5: That weirdy is a Phallales but the thing is no... | 8 | 3 | null | 13 | 0 | 13 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: That weirdy is a Pythia. fact2: This careerist is not a kind of a Crotophaga if that weirdy is not a kind of a Crotophaga. fact3: Something is subarctic if it does not substitute Rosidae and the one is a Crotophaga. fact4: Something is a Phallales but not an acknowledgement if it is not petaled. fact5:... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | The fact that cerebralness but notdeposit occurs does not hold. | ¬({A} & ¬{B}) | fact1: Cerebralness occurs and naturalisation happens. fact2: Imploring Regalecidae does not happens and probe does not occurs. fact3: Acapnialness happens but insulting does not occurs if cerebralness does not occurs. | fact1: ({A} & {C}) fact2: (¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) fact3: ¬{A} -> ({BQ} & ¬{IK}) | [
"fact1 -> int1: Cerebralness happens.;"
] | [
"fact1 -> int1: {A};"
] | Acapnialness happens but insulting does not occurs. | ({BQ} & ¬{IK}) | [] | 6 | 2 | null | 1 | 0 | 1 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: Cerebralness occurs and naturalisation happens. fact2: Imploring Regalecidae does not happens and probe does not occurs. fact3: Acapnialness happens but insulting does not occurs if cerebralness does not occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that cerebralness but notdeposit occurs does not hold. ; $proof$ ... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | Spam does not happens. | ¬{C} | fact1: Spam occurs if smudging does not occurs and asclepiadaceousness does not occurs. fact2: Asclepiadaceousness happens if the fact that notsmudging but checkers happens is false. fact3: Smudging does not happens and asclepiadaceousness does not happens if smudging does not occurs. fact4: That spam does not happens ... | fact1: (¬{B} & ¬{A}) -> {C} fact2: ¬(¬{B} & {D}) -> {A} fact3: ¬{B} -> (¬{B} & ¬{A}) fact4: {A} -> ¬{C} fact5: ({AA} & {AB}) -> ¬{B} | [] | [] | Spam does not happens. | ¬{C} | [] | 7 | 3 | null | 2 | 0 | 2 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: Spam occurs if smudging does not occurs and asclepiadaceousness does not occurs. fact2: Asclepiadaceousness happens if the fact that notsmudging but checkers happens is false. fact3: Smudging does not happens and asclepiadaceousness does not happens if smudging does not occurs. fact4: That spam does no... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | The fact that both fronting and unreproducibleness happens does not hold. | ¬({A} & {C}) | fact1: That aiming and directing occurs does not hold. fact2: That dwindling Secotiaceae does not happens brings about that interrupting Mallotus and Setting silenced happens. fact3: That gapping happens hold if the fact that the fact that uncasing happens but gapping does not occurs is false is true. fact4: Cyclosis h... | fact1: ¬({HM} & {DE}) fact2: ¬{FI} -> ({FQ} & {IE}) fact3: ¬({E} & ¬{AP}) -> {AP} fact4: {GT} fact5: ¬{EO} -> ({O} & {HB}) fact6: ¬{B} -> ¬({A} & {C}) fact7: ¬({M} & {N}) -> ¬{L} fact8: {FL} -> {IP} fact9: ¬{E} fact10: {J} -> (¬{H} & {I}) fact11: ¬{E} -> ({C} & {D}) fact12: ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}) -> {B} fact13: {B} -> {A} fac... | [
"fact11 & fact9 -> int1: Unreproducibleness and convenientness happens.; int1 -> int2: Unreproducibleness happens.;"
] | [
"fact11 & fact9 -> int1: ({C} & {D}); int1 -> int2: {C};"
] | That gapping occurs and nonacceptance occurs hold. | ({AP} & {CG}) | [] | 5 | 3 | null | 18 | 0 | 18 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: That aiming and directing occurs does not hold. fact2: That dwindling Secotiaceae does not happens brings about that interrupting Mallotus and Setting silenced happens. fact3: That gapping happens hold if the fact that the fact that uncasing happens but gapping does not occurs is false is true. fact4: ... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | The fact that both parading mustiness and non-hircineness occurs does not hold. | ¬({D} & ¬{C}) | fact1: Colourizing wigging happens. fact2: Provocation occurs. fact3: That Orthodoxness occurs is correct. fact4: Stiffening ephemeralness occurs. fact5: Non-hircineness is triggered by that stiffening ephemeralness occurs but munching Halcyon does not happens. fact6: Tending does not occurs. fact7: If stiffening ephem... | fact1: {CL} fact2: {IJ} fact3: {JD} fact4: {A} fact5: ({A} & ¬{B}) -> ¬{C} fact6: ¬{II} fact7: ¬{A} -> ¬({D} & ¬{C}) fact8: {AE} -> {IN} fact9: {F} fact10: {G} fact11: {J} -> {AQ} fact12: ¬{B} fact13: ¬{G} -> (¬{E} & ¬{F}) fact14: {E} -> {D} fact15: {F} -> {E} fact16: {I} -> (¬{G} & {H}) | [
"fact4 & fact12 -> int1: That stiffening ephemeralness happens but munching Halcyon does not happens is true.; int1 & fact5 -> int2: Hircineness does not happens.; fact15 & fact9 -> int3: Inconvenience occurs.; int3 & fact14 -> int4: Parading mustiness happens.; int2 & int4 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact4 & fact12 -> int1: ({A} & ¬{B}); int1 & fact5 -> int2: ¬{C}; fact15 & fact9 -> int3: {E}; int3 & fact14 -> int4: {D}; int2 & int4 -> hypothesis;"
] | The fact that both parading mustiness and non-hircineness occurs does not hold. | ¬({D} & ¬{C}) | [] | 8 | 3 | 3 | 10 | 0 | 10 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: Colourizing wigging happens. fact2: Provocation occurs. fact3: That Orthodoxness occurs is correct. fact4: Stiffening ephemeralness occurs. fact5: Non-hircineness is triggered by that stiffening ephemeralness occurs but munching Halcyon does not happens. fact6: Tending does not occurs. fact7: If stiffe... | fact4 & fact12 -> int1: That stiffening ephemeralness happens but munching Halcyon does not happens is true.; int1 & fact5 -> int2: Hircineness does not happens.; fact15 & fact9 -> int3: Inconvenience occurs.; int3 & fact14 -> int4: Parading mustiness happens.; int2 & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | That saccharase is rude. | {B}{aa} | fact1: this Dixieland trundles saccharase. fact2: That saccharase is a kind of a spiritualty. fact3: That saccharase is a guessing. fact4: That saccharase is a Lumpenus. fact5: That saccharase trundles Dixieland. fact6: That saccharase is bimetallistic one that does not fantasize if that saccharase decontaminates megal... | fact1: {AC}{ab} fact2: {CI}{aa} fact3: {BE}{aa} fact4: {BO}{aa} fact5: {A}{aa} fact6: {AA}{aa} -> ({FH}{aa} & ¬{EU}{aa}) fact7: ({IU}{t} & ¬{CA}{t}) -> {CC}{t} fact8: ({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} fact9: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬({B}x & {C}x) fact10: (x): ({AA}x & ¬{A}x) -> {AB}x fact11: ({EH}{cr} & ¬{A}{cr}) fact12: ({AB}{gs... | [
"fact20 -> int1: If that saccharase decontaminates megalocardia but the thing does not flaunt Nevis then that saccharase is rude.; fact18 & fact5 -> int2: That saccharase decontaminates megalocardia and does not flaunt Nevis.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact20 -> int1: ({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa}; fact18 & fact5 -> int2: ({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}); int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | That saccharase is not rude. | ¬{B}{aa} | [
"fact24 -> int3: If that balsa does not trundle Dixieland the fact that the one is not non-rude and the one swerves lx does not hold.;"
] | 6 | 2 | 2 | 19 | 0 | 19 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: this Dixieland trundles saccharase. fact2: That saccharase is a kind of a spiritualty. fact3: That saccharase is a guessing. fact4: That saccharase is a Lumpenus. fact5: That saccharase trundles Dixieland. fact6: That saccharase is bimetallistic one that does not fantasize if that saccharase decontamin... | fact20 -> int1: If that saccharase decontaminates megalocardia but the thing does not flaunt Nevis then that saccharase is rude.; fact18 & fact5 -> int2: That saccharase decontaminates megalocardia and does not flaunt Nevis.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | That tactualness happens and atacticness happens does not hold. | ¬({C} & {B}) | fact1: Inframaxillariness results in atacticness. fact2: If inframaxillariness does not happens then the fact that the fact that tactualness and atacticness occurs does not hold is true. fact3: Either atacticness does not happens or tactualness happens or both if regionalness does not happens. fact4: Tactualness happen... | fact1: {A} -> {B} fact2: ¬{A} -> ¬({C} & {B}) fact3: ¬{D} -> (¬{B} v {C}) fact4: {C} fact5: {A} fact6: {EL} -> {EQ} fact7: (¬{E} & {D}) -> ¬{A} | [
"fact1 & fact5 -> int1: Atacticness happens.; int1 & fact4 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact1 & fact5 -> int1: {B}; int1 & fact4 -> hypothesis;"
] | That tactualness happens and atacticness happens does not hold. | ¬({C} & {B}) | [] | 5 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 4 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: Inframaxillariness results in atacticness. fact2: If inframaxillariness does not happens then the fact that the fact that tactualness and atacticness occurs does not hold is true. fact3: Either atacticness does not happens or tactualness happens or both if regionalness does not happens. fact4: Tactualn... | fact1 & fact5 -> int1: Atacticness happens.; int1 & fact4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | That there is nobody that is both a Chinookan and not undeterminable does not hold. | ¬((x): ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x)) | fact1: There exists no person such that the one is a Chinookan and the person is not undeterminable. fact2: There is none such that the one relates Ortega and is not a skinful. fact3: There exists nobody that is a kind of a tensed that does not absorb. fact4: Somebody that does not descant gloved slithers and is colour... | fact1: (x): ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) fact2: (x): ¬({AC}x & ¬{FH}x) fact3: (x): ¬({GD}x & ¬{DI}x) fact4: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({A}x & {B}x) fact5: (x): ¬({GI}x & ¬{EJ}x) fact6: (x): ¬({BD}x & ¬{A}x) fact7: (x): ¬({BS}x & ¬{IR}x) fact8: (x): ¬({AA}x & {AB}x) fact9: (x): ¬({EE}x & ¬{DT}x) fact10: (x): ¬({ED}x & ¬{HM}x) fact11: (x): ¬({... | [
"fact1 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact1 -> hypothesis;"
] | There exists nothing such that the thing is a Corse that is not a Ctenocephalus. | (x): ¬({HE}x & ¬{AD}x) | [
"fact12 -> int1: Hope slithers and that is colouring if the one does not descant gloved.;"
] | 6 | 1 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: There exists no person such that the one is a Chinookan and the person is not undeterminable. fact2: There is none such that the one relates Ortega and is not a skinful. fact3: There exists nobody that is a kind of a tensed that does not absorb. fact4: Somebody that does not descant gloved slithers and... | fact1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | Nettling MAK occurs. | {C} | fact1: Non-Neanderthalianness is prevented by unscheduledness. fact2: Shuhaness is prevented by that domineeringness does not happens and/or Shuhanessness. fact3: Sinking does not happens. fact4: That avianness occurs is not wrong. fact5: Drinking is prevented by that nettling MAK but notcaramelizing happens. fact6: Ca... | fact1: {EA} -> {DL} fact2: (¬{A} v ¬{CF}) -> ¬{CF} fact3: ¬{CB} fact4: {HA} fact5: ({C} & ¬{D}) -> ¬{B} fact6: ¬{GP} fact7: ¬({A} & {B}) fact8: {EB} -> {JE} fact9: ¬{B} -> (¬{A} v ¬{CF}) fact10: ¬{B} -> ({JI} & {A}) fact11: {G} -> ({F} & ¬{E}) fact12: ¬({U} & ¬{DU}) fact13: ¬(¬{A} & {B}) -> ¬{C} fact14: ¬{D} -> ¬(¬{A} ... | [
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that domineeringness occurs and drinking does not happens.; assump1 -> int1: Domineeringness happens.;"
] | [
"void -> assump1: ({A} & ¬{B}); assump1 -> int1: {A};"
] | Nettling MAK does not happens. | ¬{C} | [] | 7 | 3 | null | 16 | 0 | 16 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: Non-Neanderthalianness is prevented by unscheduledness. fact2: Shuhaness is prevented by that domineeringness does not happens and/or Shuhanessness. fact3: Sinking does not happens. fact4: That avianness occurs is not wrong. fact5: Drinking is prevented by that nettling MAK but notcaramelizing happens.... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | That Singhalese is collateral. | {AB}{aa} | fact1: That something is attractive thing that foretells Taricha does not hold if it is not effortful. fact2: If the fact that the educationist does not bait pigeonholing is correct the educationist rebounds. fact3: Someone schematizes Gempylus. fact4: If that treasure is a polysomy and does not polymerize Geophilomorp... | fact1: (x): ¬{E}x -> ¬(¬{C}x & {D}x) fact2: ¬{BI}{gt} -> {IB}{gt} fact3: (Ex): {B}x fact4: ({G}{a} & ¬{F}{a}) -> ¬{E}{a} fact5: (Ex): ({A}x & {B}x) fact6: {AA}{aa} fact7: (x): ¬{CM}x -> ({GF}x & ¬{HK}x) fact8: ¬{B}{aa} fact9: ¬(¬{B}{a} v ¬{A}{a}) -> {A}{aa} fact10: (x): ¬{A}x -> ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) fact11: (x): ¬{A}x -> {... | [
"fact10 -> int1: If that Singhalese is not a Amphineura the fact that that Singhalese enters Myrtaceae but the man is not collateral is right.;"
] | [
"fact10 -> int1: ¬{A}{aa} -> ({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa});"
] | That Singhalese is collateral. | {AB}{aa} | [
"fact25 -> int2: That Singhalese is collateral if that Singhalese is a Amphineura.; fact21 -> int3: That that treasure does not schematize Gempylus or the one is not a kind of a Amphineura or both is false if it is unattractive.; fact24 -> int4: That treasure is unattractive if that that treasure is not unattractiv... | 9 | 3 | null | 17 | 0 | 17 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: That something is attractive thing that foretells Taricha does not hold if it is not effortful. fact2: If the fact that the educationist does not bait pigeonholing is correct the educationist rebounds. fact3: Someone schematizes Gempylus. fact4: If that treasure is a polysomy and does not polymerize Ge... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | Inextinguishableness does not happens but moistening happens. | (¬{AA} & {AB}) | fact1: That jehad occurs and acquisition occurs is caused by non-broadnosedness. fact2: That sabring Anaximander does not occurs and equestrian happens is not correct if jehad occurs. fact3: Dish and involuntaryness occurs. fact4: Unbaptisedness does not happens. fact5: Doubling Masoud does not occurs if that notmounta... | fact1: ¬{C} -> ({A} & {B}) fact2: {A} -> ¬(¬{S} & {BI}) fact3: ({EB} & ¬{R}) fact4: ¬{GL} fact5: ¬(¬{AH} & {HC}) -> ¬{AM} fact6: ({B} & ¬{A}) fact7: ¬{E} -> ¬({C} & {D}) fact8: ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}) -> ¬{B} fact9: ¬({C} & {D}) -> ¬{C} | [
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that both extinguishableness and moistening occurs is incorrect.; fact8 & assump1 -> int1: Acquisition does not occurs.; fact6 -> int2: Acquisition occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"void -> assump1: ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}); fact8 & assump1 -> int1: ¬{B}; fact6 -> int2: {B}; int1 & int2 -> int3: #F#; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | That the fact that notsabring Anaximander but equestrian happens is true is wrong. | ¬(¬{S} & {BI}) | [] | 9 | 3 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 7 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: That jehad occurs and acquisition occurs is caused by non-broadnosedness. fact2: That sabring Anaximander does not occurs and equestrian happens is not correct if jehad occurs. fact3: Dish and involuntaryness occurs. fact4: Unbaptisedness does not happens. fact5: Doubling Masoud does not occurs if that... | void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that both extinguishableness and moistening occurs is incorrect.; fact8 & assump1 -> int1: Acquisition does not occurs.; fact6 -> int2: Acquisition occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | That this necking is a MIDI but the thing is not a Desmograthus does not hold. | ¬({A}{a} & ¬{D}{a}) | fact1: Something is undiluted and it is a kind of a Riviera if the thing is not unstressed. fact2: If that Post is undiluted then the fact that this necking is Tongan is not false. fact3: That someone is a MIDI but it is not a Desmograthus is false if the one does not parch polio. fact4: This spitz is not sturdy and/or... | fact1: (x): ¬{H}x -> ({F}x & {G}x) fact2: {F}{b} -> {E}{a} fact3: (x): ¬{B}x -> ¬({A}x & ¬{D}x) fact4: (¬{I}{c} v ¬{H}{c}) fact5: ¬{C}{a} -> ({B}{al} & {A}{al}) fact6: (x): {BB}x -> ({BB}x & ¬{GI}x) fact7: (x): {EG}x -> ({EG}x & ¬{DA}x) fact8: (x): {E}x -> (¬{C}x & ¬{D}x) fact9: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) fact10: ({EH}{ck} & ¬{... | [
"fact9 -> int1: This necking is a MIDI.; fact12 -> int2: This necking is a MIDI but the one is not a Desmograthus if the one is a MIDI.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact9 -> int1: {A}{a}; fact12 -> int2: {A}{a} -> ({A}{a} & ¬{D}{a}); int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | This Ab parches polio. | {B}{al} | [
"fact18 -> int3: If this necking is Tongan the one does not contract lease and is not a Desmograthus.; fact16 -> int4: That Post is undiluted and the person is a Riviera if that Post is not unstressed.;"
] | 8 | 2 | 2 | 13 | 0 | 13 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: Something is undiluted and it is a kind of a Riviera if the thing is not unstressed. fact2: If that Post is undiluted then the fact that this necking is Tongan is not false. fact3: That someone is a MIDI but it is not a Desmograthus is false if the one does not parch polio. fact4: This spitz is not stu... | fact9 -> int1: This necking is a MIDI.; fact12 -> int2: This necking is a MIDI but the one is not a Desmograthus if the one is a MIDI.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | The fact that this carpophore is a Zoomastigina and is tactful is incorrect. | ¬({B}{b} & {C}{b}) | fact1: The fact that this kinescope is a Yi and that is lunisolar does not hold. fact2: The fact that that martingale preserves repertoire and is not tactful does not hold if this carpophore diphthongises nothingness. fact3: If that martingale diphthongises nothingness that this carpophore does not endanger Gibson and ... | fact1: ¬({F}{gr} & {G}{gr}) fact2: {A}{b} -> ¬({AB}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) fact3: {A}{a} -> ¬(¬{AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}) fact4: ({C}{b} & {D}{b}) fact5: {AA}{a} -> ¬(¬{A}{b} & ¬{C}{b}) fact6: (x): ¬{E}x -> ({D}x & {B}x) fact7: {AC}{aa} fact8: {A}{a} fact9: (x): ¬{F}x -> ¬({D}x v ¬{E}x) fact10: ¬({F}{gr} & {G}{gr}) -> ¬{E}{gr} | [
"fact3 & fact8 -> int1: The fact that this carpophore does not endanger Gibson and the thing does not preserve repertoire does not hold.; fact4 -> int2: This carpophore is tactful.;"
] | [
"fact3 & fact8 -> int1: ¬(¬{AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}); fact4 -> int2: {C}{b};"
] | The fact that this carpophore is a Zoomastigina and is tactful is incorrect. | ¬({B}{b} & {C}{b}) | [
"fact11 -> int3: The fact that this greeneye does underwrite Osmanthus or the one is not bituminoid or both is incorrect if the one is not a Yi.;"
] | 7 | 3 | null | 7 | 0 | 7 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: The fact that this kinescope is a Yi and that is lunisolar does not hold. fact2: The fact that that martingale preserves repertoire and is not tactful does not hold if this carpophore diphthongises nothingness. fact3: If that martingale diphthongises nothingness that this carpophore does not endanger G... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | The fact that Hebraicalness happens and flatteringness occurs is not right. | ¬({B} & {C}) | fact1: Disloyalness does not happens. fact2: Peppering nonuniformity occurs and arrangement occurs. fact3: Eightsome but notcomplaint occurs. fact4: Winkling Wilder occurs and ripeness happens. fact5: If motoringness does not happens then that Hebraicalness and flatteringness occurs is false. fact6: Motoringness occurs... | fact1: ¬{JA} fact2: ({L} & {JK}) fact3: ({ER} & ¬{CE}) fact4: ({GH} & {EO}) fact5: ¬{A} -> ¬({B} & {C}) fact6: {A} fact7: ({A} & {B}) fact8: {AL} fact9: ({CH} & {ER}) fact10: {IN} fact11: ({BC} & {CH}) fact12: ¬{D} fact13: {GR} fact14: ({DP} & ¬{N}) fact15: ({A} v ¬{B}) -> {GG} fact16: ¬{F} -> (¬{E} v ¬{D}) fact17: ¬{B... | [
"fact7 -> int1: Hebraicalness occurs.;"
] | [
"fact7 -> int1: {B};"
] | The fact that Hebraicalness happens and flatteringness occurs is not right. | ¬({B} & {C}) | [] | 6 | 2 | null | 18 | 0 | 18 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: Disloyalness does not happens. fact2: Peppering nonuniformity occurs and arrangement occurs. fact3: Eightsome but notcomplaint occurs. fact4: Winkling Wilder occurs and ripeness happens. fact5: If motoringness does not happens then that Hebraicalness and flatteringness occurs is false. fact6: Motoringn... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | There is somebody such that that she is Twin and is unknowing does not hold. | (Ex): ¬({AA}x & {AB}x) | fact1: There exists somebody such that the fact that the one is a Polypedatidae and is electromechanical does not hold. fact2: That that cartouche is a Hispanic and the one is not non-Twin does not hold. fact3: There exists somebody such that that it is a Pincus and the one is a pretrial does not hold. fact4: That that... | fact1: (Ex): ¬({J}x & {BG}x) fact2: ¬({IJ}{r} & {AA}{r}) fact3: (Ex): ¬({CO}x & {JC}x) fact4: ¬({GQ}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) fact5: ¬({DI}{aa} & {AA}{aa}) | [] | [] | null | null | [] | null | 2 | null | 5 | 0 | 5 | UNKNOWN | null | UNKNOWN | null | $facts$ = fact1: There exists somebody such that the fact that the one is a Polypedatidae and is electromechanical does not hold. fact2: That that cartouche is a Hispanic and the one is not non-Twin does not hold. fact3: There exists somebody such that that it is a Pincus and the one is a pretrial does not hold. fact4:... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | This subduction is not a ophthalmoplegia. | ¬{C}{c} | fact1: This subduction is a vampire. fact2: This daystar is a ophthalmoplegia if this subduction is a Camptosorus. fact3: If this Dramamine does not rook Yersin and is not a ophthalmoplegia this menorrhea is not a ophthalmoplegia. fact4: This subduction is a kind of a Camptosorus if this daystar is a ophthalmoplegia. f... | fact1: {AE}{c} fact2: {B}{c} -> {C}{b} fact3: (¬{D}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) -> ¬{C}{hq} fact4: {C}{b} -> {B}{c} fact5: {A}{c} -> {C}{a} fact6: {BP}{a} fact7: {B}{a} -> {A}{b} fact8: {C}{a} -> {A}{c} fact9: {A}{a} fact10: {A}{b} -> {B}{a} fact11: {IP}{b} fact12: {C}{dp} fact13: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({B}x & {A}x) fact14: {A}{c} fact15: {... | [
"fact17 & fact9 -> int1: This daystar is a Camptosorus.; int1 & fact18 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact17 & fact9 -> int1: {B}{b}; int1 & fact18 -> hypothesis;"
] | This menorrhea is anagrammatic. | {A}{hq} | [
"fact21 -> int2: This menorrhea is a kind of a Camptosorus and this one is anagrammatic if that the one is not a ophthalmoplegia hold.;"
] | 6 | 2 | 2 | 17 | 0 | 17 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: This subduction is a vampire. fact2: This daystar is a ophthalmoplegia if this subduction is a Camptosorus. fact3: If this Dramamine does not rook Yersin and is not a ophthalmoplegia this menorrhea is not a ophthalmoplegia. fact4: This subduction is a kind of a Camptosorus if this daystar is a ophthalm... | fact17 & fact9 -> int1: This daystar is a Camptosorus.; int1 & fact18 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | That byrnie does choke Dumuzi. | {B}{aa} | fact1: A pretend one does choke Dumuzi. fact2: This radiophotograph is not a containerful. fact3: The pravastatin does not choke Dumuzi. fact4: If someone does not fowl or it is pretend or both it chokes Dumuzi. fact5: If this radiophotograph is not a containerful then that byrnie does not fowl and/or the thing is pret... | fact1: (x): {AB}x -> {B}x fact2: ¬{A}{a} fact3: ¬{B}{am} fact4: (x): (¬{AA}x v {AB}x) -> {B}x fact5: ¬{A}{a} -> (¬{AA}{aa} v {AB}{aa}) fact6: (x): (¬{B}x v {AB}x) -> {A}x fact7: {AB}{aa} -> {B}{aa} fact8: ¬{G}{c} -> ¬(¬{F}{b} & {E}{b}) fact9: (x): {HR}x -> {JG}x fact10: ¬(¬{F}{b} & {E}{b}) -> ¬{D}{a} fact11: {AA}{a} fa... | [
"fact4 -> int1: If that byrnie does not fowl and/or the man is pretend then the man chokes Dumuzi.; fact2 & fact5 -> int2: That byrnie does not fowl or the one is pretend or both.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact4 -> int1: (¬{AA}{aa} v {AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa}; fact2 & fact5 -> int2: (¬{AA}{aa} v {AB}{aa}); int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | That byrnie does not choke Dumuzi. | ¬{B}{aa} | [] | 7 | 2 | 2 | 20 | 0 | 20 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: A pretend one does choke Dumuzi. fact2: This radiophotograph is not a containerful. fact3: The pravastatin does not choke Dumuzi. fact4: If someone does not fowl or it is pretend or both it chokes Dumuzi. fact5: If this radiophotograph is not a containerful then that byrnie does not fowl and/or the thi... | fact4 -> int1: If that byrnie does not fowl and/or the man is pretend then the man chokes Dumuzi.; fact2 & fact5 -> int2: That byrnie does not fowl or the one is pretend or both.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | Let's assume that that this sketch does not unload and/or is not conjunctival is wrong. | ¬(¬{AA}{a} v ¬{AB}{a}) | fact1: This sketch is a flail if that the thing does not unload or the thing is not conjunctival or both is not true. fact2: The chalybite is conjunctival. fact3: A ataxy is non-blastospheric person that is not a flail. fact4: There is someone such that the one does not pat. fact5: This sketch is not a trespassing. fac... | fact1: ¬(¬{AA}{a} v ¬{AB}{a}) -> {B}{a} fact2: {AB}{hu} fact3: (x): {C}x -> (¬{A}x & ¬{B}x) fact4: (Ex): ¬{I}x fact5: ¬{FP}{a} fact6: {AB}{a} fact7: ¬{C}{a} -> ({B}{ah} & {A}{ah}) fact8: (¬{B}{a} & {A}{a}) fact9: (x): {H}x -> (¬{G}x & ¬{F}x) fact10: (¬{CU}{a} v {A}{a}) fact11: (x): ¬{H}x -> ({F}x & {G}x) fact12: (x): ¬... | [
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that that this sketch does not unload and/or is not conjunctival is wrong.; fact1 & assump1 -> int1: This sketch is a flail.; fact8 -> int2: This sketch is not a flail.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"void -> assump1: ¬(¬{AA}{a} v ¬{AB}{a}); fact1 & assump1 -> int1: {B}{a}; fact8 -> int2: ¬{B}{a}; int1 & int2 -> int3: #F#; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | The precinct is blastospheric. | {A}{ah} | [
"fact24 -> int4: If this sketch is not audible then this sketch does not hurtle firmness and the one is not a kind of a ataxy.; fact26 -> int5: This salpinx indemnifies and the one is a Salvadoraceae if this salpinx does not hasten.;"
] | 9 | 3 | 3 | 20 | 0 | 20 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: This sketch is a flail if that the thing does not unload or the thing is not conjunctival or both is not true. fact2: The chalybite is conjunctival. fact3: A ataxy is non-blastospheric person that is not a flail. fact4: There is someone such that the one does not pat. fact5: This sketch is not a trespa... | void -> assump1: Let's assume that that this sketch does not unload and/or is not conjunctival is wrong.; fact1 & assump1 -> int1: This sketch is a flail.; fact8 -> int2: This sketch is not a flail.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | This handset is not a whistling. | ¬{A}{a} | fact1: That besieger is not a Sciuridae if this filigree is a tutorial and the thing resounds Lapland. fact2: This filigree is a tutorial that is a discontent. fact3: That besieger is not zodiacal if this filigree is colors. fact4: Someone is both a whistling and zodiacal if the one is not a Phallaceae. fact5: If this ... | fact1: ({I}{c} & {J}{c}) -> ¬{H}{b} fact2: ({I}{c} & {K}{c}) fact3: {D}{c} -> ¬{B}{b} fact4: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({A}x & {B}x) fact5: {A}{a} -> {B}{b} fact6: ¬{C}{b} -> ({B}{b} & {A}{b}) fact7: (x): {A}x -> ¬(¬{HP}x & {HQ}x) fact8: {D}{dr} fact9: ¬{M}{c} -> ({J}{c} & {L}{c}) fact10: ¬{H}{b} -> ({G}{b} & ¬{F}{b}) fact11: ¬(¬{... | [
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that this handset is a whistling.; fact5 & assump1 -> int1: That besieger is zodiacal.; fact12 & fact16 -> int2: That besieger is not zodiacal.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"void -> assump1: {A}{a}; fact5 & assump1 -> int1: {B}{b}; fact12 & fact16 -> int2: ¬{B}{b}; int1 & int2 -> int3: #F#; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | Let's assume that this handset is a whistling. | {A}{a} | [
"fact20 -> int4: This handset is a whistling and the thing is zodiacal if the fact that this handset is not a Phallaceae is true.; fact18 -> int5: This filigree is a kind of a tutorial.;"
] | 10 | 3 | 3 | 14 | 0 | 14 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: That besieger is not a Sciuridae if this filigree is a tutorial and the thing resounds Lapland. fact2: This filigree is a tutorial that is a discontent. fact3: That besieger is not zodiacal if this filigree is colors. fact4: Someone is both a whistling and zodiacal if the one is not a Phallaceae. fact5... | void -> assump1: Let's assume that this handset is a whistling.; fact5 & assump1 -> int1: That besieger is zodiacal.; fact12 & fact16 -> int2: That besieger is not zodiacal.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | Andalusianness occurs. | {D} | fact1: Andalusianness does not happens if notunderpayment but numbers occurs. fact2: That provoking Tellima does not happens brings about that notunderpayment but numbers happens. fact3: The fact that provoking Tellima does not occurs is right if resetting Eastertide does not occurs. fact4: If the fact that sufficientn... | fact1: (¬{A} & {C}) -> ¬{D} fact2: ¬{B} -> (¬{A} & {C}) fact3: ¬{AB} -> ¬{B} fact4: ¬({AA} & {AB}) -> ¬{B} fact5: ¬({AA} & {AB}) | [
"fact4 & fact5 -> int1: The fact that provoking Tellima does not happens is true.; int1 & fact2 -> int2: Underpayment does not happens but numbers happens.; int2 & fact1 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact4 & fact5 -> int1: ¬{B}; int1 & fact2 -> int2: (¬{A} & {C}); int2 & fact1 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null | [] | null | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | DISPROVED | null | DISPROVED | null | $facts$ = fact1: Andalusianness does not happens if notunderpayment but numbers occurs. fact2: That provoking Tellima does not happens brings about that notunderpayment but numbers happens. fact3: The fact that provoking Tellima does not occurs is right if resetting Eastertide does not occurs. fact4: If the fact that s... | fact4 & fact5 -> int1: The fact that provoking Tellima does not happens is true.; int1 & fact2 -> int2: Underpayment does not happens but numbers happens.; int2 & fact1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | The fact that there is somebody such that if the one does not convict Trilisa and the thing does log it is not unmown does not hold. | ¬((Ex): (¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> ¬{B}x) | fact1: If a predictable one is illegal then it is welcome. fact2: There is someone such that if she/he is a kind of non-indexical one that is a kind of a centner the one is not a ETF. fact3: There exists somebody such that if it is a Mollienesia and it does snow Eastertide then the thing is not woody. fact4: There exis... | fact1: (x): (¬{JI}x & {DB}x) -> ¬{CE}x fact2: (Ex): (¬{BI}x & {R}x) -> ¬{EG}x fact3: (Ex): ({DP}x & {JF}x) -> ¬{FK}x fact4: (Ex): ({AA}x & {AB}x) -> ¬{B}x fact5: (x): (¬{IL}x & {BM}x) -> ¬{JC}x fact6: (¬{GG}{ba} & {EF}{ba}) -> ¬{AC}{ba} fact7: (¬{DK}{aa} & {DI}{aa}) -> {AA}{aa} fact8: ({ED}{aa} & {FJ}{aa}) -> ¬{AO}{aa}... | [] | [] | That there exists somebody such that if the thing is not unpredictable and it is illegal then the one is not unwelcome is correct. | (Ex): (¬{JI}x & {DB}x) -> ¬{CE}x | [
"fact18 -> int1: If this ribwort is both not unpredictable and illegal then it is welcome.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | 2 | 1 | null | 17 | 0 | 17 | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | $facts$ = fact1: If a predictable one is illegal then it is welcome. fact2: There is someone such that if she/he is a kind of non-indexical one that is a kind of a centner the one is not a ETF. fact3: There exists somebody such that if it is a Mollienesia and it does snow Eastertide then the thing is not woody. fact4: ... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | That megalopolis is not uninviting. | ¬{C}{d} | fact1: If that lazar is a Guinean that kinkajou is morphological. fact2: If that that that lazar unloads Epstein and is not a Guinean hold is incorrect that kinkajou is morphological. fact3: The bloater is a stick. fact4: That that lazar unloads Epstein but it is not a Guinean does not hold if this chatterbox is a stic... | fact1: {AB}{b} -> {B}{c} fact2: ¬({AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}) -> {B}{c} fact3: {A}{ee} fact4: {A}{a} -> ¬({AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}) fact5: {AA}{c} -> {B}{b} fact6: ¬({AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) fact7: {A}{a} -> ¬({AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) fact8: {B}{c} -> {C}{d} fact9: {A}{a} fact10: ¬({A}{d} & ¬{C}{d}) | [
"fact4 & fact9 -> int1: The fact that that lazar does unload Epstein but this one is not a Guinean is false.; int1 & fact2 -> int2: That kinkajou is morphological.; int2 & fact8 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact4 & fact9 -> int1: ¬({AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}); int1 & fact2 -> int2: {B}{c}; int2 & fact8 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null | [] | null | 3 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 6 | DISPROVED | null | DISPROVED | null | $facts$ = fact1: If that lazar is a Guinean that kinkajou is morphological. fact2: If that that that lazar unloads Epstein and is not a Guinean hold is incorrect that kinkajou is morphological. fact3: The bloater is a stick. fact4: That that lazar unloads Epstein but it is not a Guinean does not hold if this chatterbox... | fact4 & fact9 -> int1: The fact that that lazar does unload Epstein but this one is not a Guinean is false.; int1 & fact2 -> int2: That kinkajou is morphological.; int2 & fact8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | That photomicrograph is not quadrisonic but this thing is marmoreal. | (¬{C}{b} & {D}{b}) | fact1: If that photomicrograph is a Prosimii and this is a guideword then the fact that the thing is not marmoreal is correct. fact2: That photomicrograph is a kind of non-marmoreal one that is quadrisonic if this geologist is not marmoreal. fact3: This geologist is a Prosimii. fact4: That photomicrograph is non-quadri... | fact1: ({A}{b} & {B}{b}) -> ¬{D}{b} fact2: ¬{D}{a} -> (¬{D}{b} & {C}{b}) fact3: {A}{a} fact4: ¬{C}{a} -> ¬{C}{b} fact5: {H}{d} -> ¬{H}{c} fact6: (x): (¬{F}x & ¬{G}x) -> ¬{B}x fact7: (x): ¬{H}x -> (¬{F}x & ¬{G}x) fact8: ¬{B}{de} fact9: ({C}{b} & {B}{b}) -> ¬{A}{b} fact10: ({C}{ae} & {ET}{ae}) fact11: {B}{a} fact12: ¬{C}... | [
"fact3 & fact11 -> int1: This geologist is a kind of a Prosimii and is a guideword.; fact15 -> int2: This geologist is not quadrisonic if this geologist is a kind of a Prosimii and the thing is a kind of a guideword.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This geologist is not quadrisonic.; int3 & fact14 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact3 & fact11 -> int1: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}); fact15 -> int2: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) -> ¬{C}{a}; int1 & int2 -> int3: ¬{C}{a}; int3 & fact14 -> hypothesis;"
] | That that photomicrograph is non-quadrisonic but not non-marmoreal is wrong. | ¬(¬{C}{b} & {D}{b}) | [
"fact19 -> int4: If this watercraft does not dismount freehold and is not a kind of a Jeffersonian then this watercraft is not a guideword.; fact18 -> int5: If this watercraft is not supernaturalistic then this watercraft does not dismount freehold and is not a Jeffersonian.; fact20 & fact21 -> int6: This watercraf... | 7 | 3 | 3 | 13 | 0 | 13 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: If that photomicrograph is a Prosimii and this is a guideword then the fact that the thing is not marmoreal is correct. fact2: That photomicrograph is a kind of non-marmoreal one that is quadrisonic if this geologist is not marmoreal. fact3: This geologist is a Prosimii. fact4: That photomicrograph is ... | fact3 & fact11 -> int1: This geologist is a kind of a Prosimii and is a guideword.; fact15 -> int2: This geologist is not quadrisonic if this geologist is a kind of a Prosimii and the thing is a kind of a guideword.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This geologist is not quadrisonic.; int3 & fact14 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | This arch sparks Melia. | {D}{c} | fact1: This arch does not spark Melia if this interchange is a kind of a Innsbruck that does not symmetrize Dicranaceae. fact2: That this arch does not symmetrize Dicranaceae and/or the one is a soldiership is wrong if that borsh is a Innsbruck. fact3: That that borsh is a kind of non-alchemic person that does not este... | fact1: ({C}{b} & ¬{A}{b}) -> ¬{D}{c} fact2: {C}{a} -> ¬(¬{A}{c} v {B}{c}) fact3: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) fact4: (x): ¬(¬{A}x v {B}x) -> {D}x fact5: (x): ¬({E}x & {D}x) -> ¬{C}x fact6: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) -> {B}{b} fact7: (x): ¬(¬{F}x & {G}x) -> {F}x fact8: (x): {B}x -> ({C}x & ¬{A}x) fact9: (x): ¬{F}x fact10: {F}{b} ... | [
"fact6 & fact3 -> int1: This interchange is a soldiership.; fact8 -> int2: This interchange is a Innsbruck and does not symmetrize Dicranaceae if the man is a soldiership.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This interchange is a kind of a Innsbruck and does not symmetrize Dicranaceae.; int3 & fact1 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact6 & fact3 -> int1: {B}{b}; fact8 -> int2: {B}{b} -> ({C}{b} & ¬{A}{b}); int1 & int2 -> int3: ({C}{b} & ¬{A}{b}); int3 & fact1 -> hypothesis;"
] | The fact that that brooding is a soldiership is right. | {B}{r} | [
"fact12 -> int4: That brooding is not a kind of a Innsbruck if the fact that the thing is a surrebuttal and the thing sparks Melia is wrong.; fact11 -> int5: That borsh does not dawn Agee.;"
] | 7 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 6 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: This arch does not spark Melia if this interchange is a kind of a Innsbruck that does not symmetrize Dicranaceae. fact2: That this arch does not symmetrize Dicranaceae and/or the one is a soldiership is wrong if that borsh is a Innsbruck. fact3: That that borsh is a kind of non-alchemic person that doe... | fact6 & fact3 -> int1: This interchange is a soldiership.; fact8 -> int2: This interchange is a Innsbruck and does not symmetrize Dicranaceae if the man is a soldiership.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This interchange is a kind of a Innsbruck and does not symmetrize Dicranaceae.; int3 & fact1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | Culminating does not happens and villainy does not happens. | (¬{A} & ¬{B}) | fact1: Culminating does not occurs. | fact1: ¬{A} | [] | [] | null | null | [] | null | 1 | null | 0 | 0 | 0 | UNKNOWN | null | UNKNOWN | null | $facts$ = fact1: Culminating does not occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = Culminating does not happens and villainy does not happens. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | This lawgiver is non-syndetic. | ¬{A}{a} | fact1: The cardholder is syndetic. fact2: That this lawgiver is dermic is correct. fact3: The bloodstone is syndetic. fact4: This lawgiver is a kind of a DDS. | fact1: {A}{ba} fact2: {FN}{a} fact3: {A}{dm} fact4: {IO}{a} | [] | [] | null | null | [] | null | 1 | null | 4 | 0 | 4 | UNKNOWN | null | UNKNOWN | null | $facts$ = fact1: The cardholder is syndetic. fact2: That this lawgiver is dermic is correct. fact3: The bloodstone is syndetic. fact4: This lawgiver is a kind of a DDS. ; $hypothesis$ = This lawgiver is non-syndetic. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | This zoo is not a ternion. | ¬{C}{c} | fact1: If that Paiute is atomistic the fact that this zoo is not atomistic but it is not non-aeromedical does not hold. fact2: That airstrip does not debauch if that airstrip leavens and the thing confounds romance. fact3: That this opener is a lowercase is true. fact4: If that that interchange is aeromedical and/or is... | fact1: {B}{b} -> ¬(¬{B}{c} & {D}{c}) fact2: ({L}{f} & {K}{f}) -> ¬{J}{f} fact3: {A}{a} fact4: ({D}{d} v ¬{A}{d}) -> ¬{A}{b} fact5: (x): ¬(¬{N}x & {M}x) -> ¬{M}{f} fact6: (x): ¬(¬{B}x & {D}x) -> {C}x fact7: (x): ¬{O}x -> ¬(¬{H}x & {G}x) fact8: (x): ¬{A}x -> {C}x fact9: (Ex): ¬(¬{N}x & {M}x) fact10: (x): (¬{F}x & ¬{E}x) ... | [
"fact16 & fact3 -> int1: That Paiute is atomistic.; int1 & fact1 -> int2: The fact that this zoo is not atomistic but this person is aeromedical does not hold.; fact6 -> int3: If that this zoo is a kind of non-atomistic one that is aeromedical does not hold this zoo is a ternion.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact16 & fact3 -> int1: {B}{b}; int1 & fact1 -> int2: ¬(¬{B}{c} & {D}{c}); fact6 -> int3: ¬(¬{B}{c} & {D}{c}) -> {C}{c}; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | This zoo is not a ternion. | ¬{C}{c} | [
"fact24 -> int4: If that interchange is not onshore and is not a Bligh then the one is not a lowercase.; fact27 -> int5: If the fact that that interchange does not razor Balthazar but the one does institutionalise does not hold the thing is not onshore.; fact26 -> int6: That the fact that this rain does not razor B... | 12 | 3 | 3 | 12 | 0 | 12 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: If that Paiute is atomistic the fact that this zoo is not atomistic but it is not non-aeromedical does not hold. fact2: That airstrip does not debauch if that airstrip leavens and the thing confounds romance. fact3: That this opener is a lowercase is true. fact4: If that that interchange is aeromedical... | fact16 & fact3 -> int1: That Paiute is atomistic.; int1 & fact1 -> int2: The fact that this zoo is not atomistic but this person is aeromedical does not hold.; fact6 -> int3: If that this zoo is a kind of non-atomistic one that is aeromedical does not hold this zoo is a ternion.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED_... |
0.3 | That if that fretsaw is not shaven then that fretsaw either is not a kind of a coinsurance or does foal Phalacrocoracidae or both does not hold. | ¬({A}{aa} -> (¬{AA}{aa} v {AB}{aa})) | fact1: Something is not false or the thing coppers pourboire or both if the thing enjoys. fact2: A Dactyloscopidae is not mesodermal and/or is a kind of a Euler. fact3: Something that is cybernetic either does not dull countersign or is a operand or both. fact4: Either the alyssum is not a thermochemistry or it is unsh... | fact1: (x): {FN}x -> (¬{ER}x v {G}x) fact2: (x): {HP}x -> (¬{HT}x v {FJ}x) fact3: (x): {GB}x -> (¬{BR}x v {J}x) fact4: {FF}{ip} -> (¬{IB}{ip} v {A}{ip}) fact5: (x): {IS}x -> (¬{DJ}x v {BK}x) fact6: (x): {A}x -> ({AA}x v {AB}x) fact7: (x): {A}x -> (¬{AA}x v {AB}x) fact8: (x): {GE}x -> (¬{E}x v {BI}x) fact9: {C}{aa} -> (... | [
"fact7 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact7 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null | [] | null | 1 | 1 | 15 | 0 | 15 | DISPROVED | null | DISPROVED | null | $facts$ = fact1: Something is not false or the thing coppers pourboire or both if the thing enjoys. fact2: A Dactyloscopidae is not mesodermal and/or is a kind of a Euler. fact3: Something that is cybernetic either does not dull countersign or is a operand or both. fact4: Either the alyssum is not a thermochemistry or ... | fact7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | That platypus projects Asurbanipal. | {E}{c} | fact1: If that woodpecker is a Stowe the one is a harrowing. fact2: This Revere does not hasp Snellen. fact3: Something does not exceed Fabaceae. fact4: That woodpecker suckles and is a kind of a recognisance. fact5: If this vet does not project Asurbanipal that platypus does not project Asurbanipal. fact6: This vet is... | fact1: {I}{b} -> {F}{b} fact2: ¬{L}{d} fact3: (Ex): ¬{A}x fact4: ({H}{b} & {M}{b}) fact5: ¬{E}{a} -> ¬{E}{c} fact6: ({G}{b} & {F}{b}) -> ¬{D}{a} fact7: ¬{L}{d} -> ({K}{d} v {J}{d}) fact8: {K}{d} -> {I}{b} fact9: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬(¬{B}{a} & {C}{a}) fact10: {B}{a} -> {D}{b} fact11: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬({B}x & {E}x) fact12: ¬(¬{... | [
"fact3 & fact9 -> int1: That this vet is not a Amentiferae and arranges Manzoni is false.;"
] | [
"fact3 & fact9 -> int1: ¬(¬{B}{a} & {C}{a});"
] | That platypus does not project Asurbanipal. | ¬{E}{c} | [
"fact27 -> int2: This vet does not project Asurbanipal if that this vet is a Amentiferae and the thing does project Asurbanipal is false.; fact26 -> int3: That this vet is a kind of a Amentiferae and projects Asurbanipal does not hold if it does not exceed Fabaceae.; fact17 -> int4: This vet does not exceed Fabacea... | 10 | 3 | null | 13 | 0 | 13 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: If that woodpecker is a Stowe the one is a harrowing. fact2: This Revere does not hasp Snellen. fact3: Something does not exceed Fabaceae. fact4: That woodpecker suckles and is a kind of a recognisance. fact5: If this vet does not project Asurbanipal that platypus does not project Asurbanipal. fact6: T... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | That there exists somebody such that if the fact that the one pours or the one is not topological or both does not hold it is a kind of a Gosainthan is wrong. | ¬((Ex): ¬({AA}x v ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x) | fact1: That there is something such that if that either the one is not non-major or the thing is not a kind of a drip or both does not hold then the thing is phocine is true. fact2: Ethan is a kind of a Gosainthan if Ethan pours and/or is not topological. fact3: There is somebody such that if that the one pours and/or ... | fact1: (Ex): ¬({CH}x v ¬{ID}x) -> {BM}x fact2: ({AA}{aa} v ¬{AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} fact3: (Ex): ¬({AA}x v {AB}x) -> {B}x fact4: (Ex): ¬({G}x v ¬{FK}x) -> {BI}x fact5: ¬({AA}{aa} v {AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} fact6: ¬({AA}{aa} v ¬{DT}{aa}) -> {CK}{aa} fact7: ¬({IK}{ch} v ¬{B}{ch}) -> {GU}{ch} fact8: (Ex): ({AA}x v ¬{AB}x) -> {B}... | [] | [] | There exists someone such that if that the fact that that person is fossil or the one is not macroeconomic or both hold is not right the one is a jolt. | (Ex): ¬({GN}x v ¬{I}x) -> {IH}x | [
"fact17 -> int1: The fact that that Sheetrock is a jolt hold if the fact that this person is fossil or is not macroeconomic or both is incorrect.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | 2 | 1 | null | 16 | 0 | 16 | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | $facts$ = fact1: That there is something such that if that either the one is not non-major or the thing is not a kind of a drip or both does not hold then the thing is phocine is true. fact2: Ethan is a kind of a Gosainthan if Ethan pours and/or is not topological. fact3: There is somebody such that if that the one pou... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | Both pinochle and filarialness occurs. | ({A} & {C}) | fact1: That episode does not occurs triggers that nonoperationalness happens and pinochle happens. fact2: Unenforceableness happens and lifting Psilotaceae occurs. fact3: Idling happens. fact4: Equating tagged leads to that idling does not happens and episode does not happens. fact5: Pressurizing Priam occurs and deter... | fact1: ¬{B} -> ({GA} & {A}) fact2: ({O} & {HJ}) fact3: {D} fact4: {E} -> (¬{D} & ¬{B}) fact5: ({GG} & {DC}) fact6: ¬{J} -> (¬{H} & ¬{I}) fact7: ¬{H} -> ({F} & {G}) fact8: ¬({K} & ¬{L}) -> ¬{J} fact9: ¬{L} -> {K} fact10: ¬{O} -> (¬{M} & ¬{N}) fact11: {DU} fact12: ¬{H} -> ¬(¬{F} & ¬{G}) fact13: ¬{B} -> ¬({A} & {C}) fact1... | [
"fact15 -> int1: Pinochle happens.;"
] | [
"fact15 -> int1: {A};"
] | The fact that both pinochle and filarialness occurs does not hold. | ¬({A} & {C}) | [] | 10 | 2 | null | 20 | 0 | 20 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: That episode does not occurs triggers that nonoperationalness happens and pinochle happens. fact2: Unenforceableness happens and lifting Psilotaceae occurs. fact3: Idling happens. fact4: Equating tagged leads to that idling does not happens and episode does not happens. fact5: Pressurizing Priam occurs... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | Outdoorness does not happens and expostulation does not occurs. | (¬{C} & ¬{D}) | fact1: Seating Liliaceae does not happens and jamming lira does not occurs. fact2: Outdoorness does not occurs and expostulation does not occurs if outdoorness does not occurs. fact3: Unboxing cabal does not occurs if unboxing cabal does not occurs or clutching unfamiliarity does not occurs or both. fact4: Subvention d... | fact1: (¬{AT} & ¬{FI}) fact2: ¬{C} -> (¬{C} & ¬{D}) fact3: (¬{E} v ¬{G}) -> ¬{E} fact4: ¬{A} -> (¬{FR} & ¬{IC}) fact5: {A} fact6: ¬{F} -> ({E} & {D}) fact7: ¬{IK} -> (¬{IK} & ¬{AS}) fact8: (¬{H} & {G}) -> ¬{F} fact9: ({A} & {B}) -> ¬{C} fact10: {CT} fact11: {B} fact12: ({CC} & {ES}) -> ¬{EK} fact13: ¬{E} -> ¬({B} & {A}... | [
"fact5 & fact11 -> int1: Both pretentiousness and anencephalousness occurs.; int1 & fact9 -> int2: That outdoorness does not happens is correct.; int2 & fact2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact5 & fact11 -> int1: ({A} & {B}); int1 & fact9 -> int2: ¬{C}; int2 & fact2 -> hypothesis;"
] | The fact that that outdoorness does not happens and expostulation does not happens is true is false. | ¬(¬{C} & ¬{D}) | [] | 8 | 3 | 3 | 11 | 0 | 11 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: Seating Liliaceae does not happens and jamming lira does not occurs. fact2: Outdoorness does not occurs and expostulation does not occurs if outdoorness does not occurs. fact3: Unboxing cabal does not occurs if unboxing cabal does not occurs or clutching unfamiliarity does not occurs or both. fact4: Su... | fact5 & fact11 -> int1: Both pretentiousness and anencephalousness occurs.; int1 & fact9 -> int2: That outdoorness does not happens is correct.; int2 & fact2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio
README.md exists but content is empty.
- Downloads last month
- 3