id stringlengths 7 21 | original_text stringlengths 24 8.57k | domain stringclasses 31
values | text_type stringclasses 2
values | ground_truth stringclasses 2
values | direct_grpo_v1_3 stringclasses 2
values | direct_grpo_v1_4 stringclasses 2
values | direct_grpo_v1_5 stringclasses 2
values | direct_grpo_v1_6 stringclasses 2
values | reader_grpo_v5_3 stringlengths 377 881 | reader_grpo_v7_1 stringlengths 362 887 | reader_grpo_v7_2 stringlengths 359 871 | reader_grpo_v7_3 stringlengths 342 854 | direct_sft stringclasses 2
values | reader_sft stringlengths 378 1.24k | Qwen_instruct_1.5b_reason stringlengths 449 3.05k | reader_grpo_v5_3_direct stringlengths 16 183 | reader_grpo_v7_1_direct stringlengths 16 183 | reader_grpo_v7_2_direct stringlengths 16 183 | reader_grpo_v7_3_direct stringlengths 16 192 | Qwen_instruct_1.5b_reason_direct stringclasses 4
values | baseline_bert_base float64 0 1 | baseline_bert_base_pred stringclasses 2
values | baseline_bert_large float64 0 1 | baseline_bert_large_pred stringclasses 2
values | baseline_llkd float64 -8.88 -0.16 | baseline_llkd_pred stringclasses 2
values | baseline_ent float64 0.2 3.78 | baseline_ent_pred stringclasses 2
values | baseline_logr float64 -4.44 -0.06 | baseline_logr_pred stringclasses 2
values | baseline_lrr float64 1.7 3.72 | baseline_lrr_pred stringclasses 2
values | baseline_npr float64 0.98 1.76 | baseline_npr_pred stringclasses 2
values | baseline_dna float64 -3.74 1.44 | baseline_dna_pred stringclasses 2
values | baseline_dgpt float64 -0.68 13.4 | baseline_dgpt_pred stringclasses 2
values | baseline_bino float64 0.47 3.09 | baseline_bino_pred stringclasses 2
values | baseline_radar float64 0 1 | baseline_radar_pred stringclasses 2
values | baseline_imbd float64 -79.38 3.45 | baseline_imbd_pred stringclasses 2
values | baseline_fastdgpt float64 -12.45 8.04 | baseline_fastdgpt_pred stringclasses 2
values | baseline_adadgpt float64 -0.09 0.42 | baseline_adadgpt_pred stringclasses 2
values | prompt_len int64 41 1.92k | qwen_baseline_bert_base float64 0 1 | qwen_baseline_bert_base_pred stringclasses 2
values | qwen_baseline_bert_large float64 0 1 | qwen_baseline_bert_large_pred stringclasses 2
values | qwen_baseline_llkd float64 -6.99 -0.17 | qwen_baseline_llkd_pred stringclasses 2
values | qwen_baseline_ent float64 0.14 5.73 | qwen_baseline_ent_pred stringclasses 2
values | qwen_baseline_logr float64 -4.55 -0.07 | qwen_baseline_logr_pred stringclasses 2
values | qwen_baseline_lrr float64 1.49 3.27 | qwen_baseline_lrr_pred stringclasses 2
values | qwen_baseline_npr float64 0.97 2.45 | qwen_baseline_npr_pred stringclasses 2
values | qwen_baseline_dna float64 -2.83 1.32 | qwen_baseline_dna_pred stringclasses 2
values | qwen_baseline_dgpt float64 -0.67 14.8 | qwen_baseline_dgpt_pred stringclasses 2
values | qwen_baseline_bino float64 0.6 4.11 | qwen_baseline_bino_pred stringclasses 2
values | qwen_baseline_radar float64 0 1 | qwen_baseline_radar_pred stringclasses 2
values | qwen_baseline_imbd float64 -49.69 5 | qwen_baseline_imbd_pred stringclasses 2
values | qwen_baseline_fastdgpt float64 -20.63 10.7 | qwen_baseline_fastdgpt_pred stringclasses 2
values | qwen_baseline_adadgpt float64 0 0.7 | qwen_baseline_adadgpt_pred stringclasses 2
values | baseline_biscope float64 0 1 | baseline_biscope_pred stringclasses 2
values | qwen_baseline_biscope float64 0 1 | qwen_baseline_biscope_pred stringclasses 2
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
human_1 | The problem with burning petroleum is that we release CO2 that has not been in the atmospheric cycle for a long time, so it's just "extra" to what we usually have. On the other hand you can plant as many trees as you'd like to but you're not going to change how much carbon there is in the cycle. Hence we should immedia... | cmv | human | HUMAN | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {
"rationale": "First, the passage contains forum-specific markers (CMV, moderator footnote, bracketed links) and a conversational, anecdotal tone typical of human online posts. Second, it shows small stylistic inconsistencies, hedging ('I believe'), and personal nuance ('I conclude...') that AI rarely produce with t... | {
"rationale": "First, the passage contains forum-specific markers (CMV, moderator footnote, bracketed links) and a conversational, anecdotal tone typical of human online posts. Second, it shows small inconsistencies, colloquial phrasings ('just 'extra' to what we usually have') and hedging language ('I believe', 'I ... | {
"rationale": "First, the passage contains forum-specific markers (CMV, moderator footnote, bracketed links) and casual, conversational phrasing typical of human online posts. Second, it shows small stylistic inconsistencies and personal hedging ('I believe', 'I conclude') suggesting spontaneous human writing rather... | {
"rationale": "First, the passage contains forum-specific markers (CMV, moderator footnote, bracketed links) and a conversational, anecdotal tone typical of human online posts. Second, it shows small inconsistencies, colloquial phrasings ('just 'extra' to what we usually have'), and hedging language ('I believe') su... | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {
"rationale": "First, the passage contains informal, opinionated language and conversational hedges ('I believe', 'I conclude') typical of a human poster rather than a neutral AI summary. Second, it includes a clear Reddit moderator footnote with bracketed link placeholders and formatting artifacts (e.g., '[read thr... | Firstly, let's examine the language used in the text. It contains informal, conversational writing typical of personal communication rather than formal academic or journalistic writing. Words like "we," "you," and "us" indicate a personal tone.
Secondly, the text uses contractions frequently ("don't," "it's"), which i... | {
"verdict": "HUMAN",
"analysis": "The passage contains forum-specific markers (CMV, moderator footnote, bracketed links, | {
"verdict": "HUMAN",
"analysis": "The passage contains forum-specific markers (CMV, moderator footnote, bracketed links, | {
"verdict": "HUMAN",
"analysis": "The text shows forum-specific markers (CMV header, moderator footnote with bracketed links | {
"verdict": "HUMAN",
"analysis": "The text shows forum-specific markers (CMV, moderator footnote, bracketed links, | {"verdict":"AI"} | 0.000192 | HUMAN | 0.003965 | HUMAN | -2.462891 | HUMAN | 2.138672 | HUMAN | -1.129432 | HUMAN | 2.148972 | HUMAN | 1.017638 | HUMAN | -0.423828 | HUMAN | 0.813095 | AI | 1.088757 | HUMAN | 0.989079 | AI | -30.96875 | HUMAN | -1.46875 | HUMAN | 0.142267 | AI | 312 | 0.000192 | HUMAN | 0.003965 | HUMAN | -2.871094 | HUMAN | 2.560547 | HUMAN | -1.43383 | HUMAN | 2.002395 | HUMAN | 1.00927 | HUMAN | -0.822266 | HUMAN | 0.545438 | HUMAN | 1.115152 | HUMAN | 0.989079 | AI | -21.375 | HUMAN | -2.117188 | HUMAN | 0.216693 | AI | 0 | HUMAN | 0.01 | HUMAN |
human_2 | I have been trying to understand the whole 'media representation' issue a bit better, and I do appreciate that representation of minorities can be extremely beneficial to society as a whole, so I hope you won't see this question as offensive. Disney has recently announced that they will produce a live-action Mulan movi... | cmv | human | HUMAN | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {
"rationale": "First, the post shows forum-specific markers (TL;DR, moderator footnote with bracketed links, CMV), casual phrasing, and typographic inconsistencies typical of human online posts. Second, it contains personal details, hedging ('I could be completely wrong'), cultural references, and uneven argumentati... | {
"rationale": "First, the post shows forum-specific markers (TL;DR, moderator footnote with bracketed links, CMV), casual tone, and context-dependent references typical of human online posts. Second, it contains idiosyncratic phrasings, small grammatical slips ('Because it would...'), and culturally specific details... | {
"rationale": "First, the post shows forum-specific markers (TL;DR, moderator footnote with bracketed links, CMV), casual tone, and context-dependent references typical of human online posts. Second, it contains idiosyncratic phrasings, small grammatical slips ('Because it would...'), and culturally specific details... | {
"rationale": "First, the post displays a highly conversational, forum-specific tone with personal hedging, apologetic phrasing, and community markers (Tl;dr, moderator footnote with bracketed links) consistent with human online posting. Second, it contains idiosyncratic errors and inconsistencies (e.g., 'why it wou... | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {
"rationale": "First, the post reads like a personal Reddit CMV submission with informal tone, rhetorical questions, parenthetical asides, and a moderator footnote — hallmarks of human forum posts. Second, it contains small grammatical slips, inconsistent phrasing, and culturally specific details (e.g., family origi... | Firstly, let's consider the overall structure and coherence of the text. The text appears to be written in a conversational tone, discussing various points related to media representation and casting decisions. There is no apparent attempt to present information in a structured format typical of formal writing.
Second... | {
"verdict": "HUMAN",
"analysis": "The post shows forum-specific markers (TL;DR, moderator footnote with bracketed links | {
"verdict": "HUMAN",
"analysis": "The post shows forum-specific markers (TL;DR, moderator footnote with bracketed links | {
"verdict": "HUMAN",
"analysis": "The post shows forum-specific markers (TL;DR, moderator footnote with bracketed links | {
"verdict": "HUMAN",
"analysis": "The post shows forum-specific markers (TL;DR, moderator footnote with bracketed links | {"verdict":"AI"} | 0.000212 | HUMAN | 0.000467 | HUMAN | -2.177734 | HUMAN | 2.044922 | HUMAN | -0.977476 | HUMAN | 2.244912 | AI | 1.087514 | AI | -0.279297 | AI | 3.225784 | AI | 0.994152 | HUMAN | 0.298454 | AI | -35.125 | HUMAN | 0.414063 | AI | 0.163787 | AI | 621 | 0.000212 | HUMAN | 0.000467 | HUMAN | -2.570313 | HUMAN | 2.480469 | HUMAN | -1.244879 | HUMAN | 2.064708 | HUMAN | 1.081304 | AI | -0.570313 | HUMAN | 2.876357 | AI | 1.018519 | HUMAN | 0.298454 | AI | -22.421875 | HUMAN | -0.438477 | HUMAN | 0.331305 | AI | 0 | HUMAN | 0 | HUMAN |
human_3 | I've heard a lot of flak directed towards Abercrombie and Fitch due to their exclusionary business tactics. Their CEO stated they don't sell women's plus sizes because they don't want overweight women wearing their clothes. Also, I've heard (but cannot confirm) that AF burns extra clothes instead of donating them bc th... | cmv | human | HUMAN | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {
"rationale": "First, the post uses casual forum markers ('CMV'), contractions ('bc'), parenthetical uncertainty '(but cannot confirm)', and slang ('flak') which match human online posting patterns. Second, it includes personal hedging ('I don't think this is wrong') and specific community conventions (Google search... | {
"rationale": "First, the post uses casual forum markers ('CMV') and slang ('bc'), personal hedging ('I've heard... but cannot confirm'), and parenthetical asides, which are common in human online replies. Second, it shows small inconsistencies and colloquial phrasings ('Also, I've heard...') suggesting spontaneous ... | {
"rationale": "First, the post uses casual forum markers ('CMV') and slang ('bc'), personal hedging ('I've heard... but cannot confirm'), and parenthetical asides, matching human Reddit-style writing. Second, there are small inconsistencies and colloquial phrasings ('Also, I've heard...') suggesting spontaneous huma... | {
"rationale": "First, the post uses casual forum language ('CMV'), slang ('bc'), and personal hedging ('I've heard... but cannot confirm') which are common in human online posts. Second, it shows uneven phrasing, repetition, and minor factual imprecision suggesting spontaneous human writing rather than polished AI o... | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {
"rationale": "First, the post uses informal shorthand like \"CMV\" and parenthetical uncertainty (\"I've heard... but cannot confirm\"), which are typical of casual Reddit-style posts written by humans. Second, there are small grammatical slips and inconsistent capitalization/capitalization patterns (e.g., lowercas... | Firstly, let's examine the language used in the text. The author uses informal language and colloquial expressions like "flak," "don't want," and "burn." This suggests a human writer rather than an AI system.
Secondly, the text contains factual information about Abercrombie & Fitch's policies regarding size inclusivit... | {
"verdict": "HUMAN",
"analysis": "The post uses casual forum markers ('CMV'), contractions ('bc'), personal hed | {
"verdict": "HUMAN",
"analysis": "The post uses casual forum markers ('CMV'), contractions ('bc'), personal hed | {
"verdict": "HUMAN",
"analysis": "The post uses casual forum markers ('CMV'), contractions ('bc'), personal hed | {
"verdict": "HUMAN"
} | {"verdict":"AI"} | 0.000209 | HUMAN | 0.000965 | HUMAN | -2.306641 | HUMAN | 1.978516 | HUMAN | -1.104956 | HUMAN | 2.187759 | HUMAN | 1.023643 | HUMAN | -0.350586 | HUMAN | 0.481478 | HUMAN | 1.047337 | HUMAN | 0.879981 | AI | -23.25 | HUMAN | -0.910156 | HUMAN | 0.089916 | AI | 181 | 0.000209 | HUMAN | 0.000965 | HUMAN | -2.716797 | HUMAN | 2.476563 | HUMAN | -1.391563 | HUMAN | 1.952334 | HUMAN | 1.014629 | AI | -0.492188 | HUMAN | 0.31409 | HUMAN | 1.0875 | HUMAN | 0.879981 | AI | -14.1875 | HUMAN | -1.082031 | HUMAN | 0.156312 | AI | 0.23 | HUMAN | 0.39 | HUMAN |
human_4 | Since this is a case of priority, a comparison needs to be made between the benefits of increasing global wealth and increasing global warming. Increasing global wealth is something that does not only benefit the 1st world, but has also benefited the 3rd world (after all, the number of countries with a 1600's level of ... | cmv | human | HUMAN | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {
"rationale": "First, the passage shows a distinct personal voice with colloquial phrasings, rhetorical asides, and uneven grammar/typos (e.g., '43 of global population' missing '%') typical of human forum posts. Second, it includes contextual references, emotional stance, and idiosyncratic numerical choices ('about... | {
"rationale": "First, the passage shows a conversational, forum-style voice with personal markers ('explains my point...') and idiosyncratic errors/typos (e.g., '43 of global population' missing '%', 'Tuberculosis' lowercased) typical of human typing. Second, it uses uneven organization, rhetorical asides, and emoti... | {
"rationale": "First, the passage shows a conversational, forum-style voice with personal markers ('explains my point...') and idiosyncratic errors (e.g., '43 of global population' missing '%') typical of human typing. Second, there are uneven grammar choices, inconsistent citation styles, and local stylistic quirks... | {
"rationale": "First, the passage shows a conversational, forum-style voice with personal touches ('explains my point...') and idiosyncratic errors (e.g., '43 of global population' missing '%', odd hyphenation) typical of human typing. Second, it contains uneven organization, rhetorical asides, and emotionally weigh... | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {
"rationale": "First, the passage contains informal phrasing, typos and inconsistent formatting (e.g., 'a 1600's', '43 of global population') and uneven punctuation that resemble quick human drafting rather than polished AI output. Second, it includes personal voice and rhetorical moves ('explains my point...', 'I b... | Firstly, the text follows a logical flow of argumentation, starting with the importance of comparing the benefits of increasing global wealth versus global warming. It provides statistical data to support its points, including figures on global poverty levels and mortality rates.
Secondly, the language used throughout... | {
"verdict": "HUMAN",
"analysis": "The passage shows a distinct personal voice with colloquial phrasings, inconsistent citation | {
"verdict": "HUMAN",
"analysis": "The passage shows a conversational, opinionated voice with personal touches ('explains my | {
"verdict": "HUMAN",
"analysis": "The passage shows a conversational, opinionated voice with personal touches ('explains my | {
"verdict": "HUMAN",
"analysis": "The passage shows a conversational, forum-style voice with personal touches (e.g., | {"verdict":"AI"} | 0.021736 | HUMAN | 0.000997 | HUMAN | -2.507813 | HUMAN | 2.080078 | HUMAN | -1.181102 | HUMAN | 2.098639 | HUMAN | 1.065678 | AI | -0.53418 | HUMAN | 3.050922 | AI | 1.143791 | HUMAN | 0.007828 | HUMAN | -37.5625 | HUMAN | -3.033203 | HUMAN | 0.128466 | AI | 587 | 0.021736 | HUMAN | 0.000997 | HUMAN | -2.607422 | HUMAN | 2.574219 | HUMAN | -1.297825 | HUMAN | 2.009071 | HUMAN | 1.061927 | AI | -0.53125 | HUMAN | 3.205408 | AI | 1.005988 | HUMAN | 0.007828 | HUMAN | -28.421875 | HUMAN | -0.039886 | HUMAN | 0.331646 | AI | 0.06 | HUMAN | 0.09 | HUMAN |
human_5 | I believe this, because I think human lives improved the most through social and economical revolutions and believe they will keep improving through social and economical changes. Glad to hear your opinions Edit: Thank you all for such an interest discussion. Let me clarify my stance on this subject: Study biochemistry... | cmv | human | HUMAN | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {
"rationale": "First, the passage contains forum-specific markers ('Edit:', ' Glad to hear your opinions') and a conversational, self-correcting tone typical of human posts. Second, there are casual typos and inconsistencies (e.g., 'put to much', mismatched quotes, uneven spacing) suggesting spontaneous human typing... | {
"rationale": "First, the passage shows a conversational, forum-style voice with personal details ('I believe this', 'Edit: Thank you all') and casual typos/grammar slips ('put to much emphasize'), which are typical of human posts. Second, it contains idiosyncratic phrasings and uneven punctuation/quotation usage ('... | {
"rationale": "First, the passage shows a conversational, forum-style voice with personal details ('I believe this', 'Edit: Thank you all') and casual typos/spacing inconsistencies typical of human posts. Second, there are idiosyncratic phrasings and uneven punctuation (e.g., misplaced closing parenthesis, repeated ... | {
"rationale": "First, the passage shows a highly conversational, forum-style voice with personal details ('I believe', 'Glad to hear your opinions') and explicit edits, suggesting spontaneous human posting. Second, there are multiple typographical and grammatical inconsistencies (misused 'economical' for 'economic',... | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {
"rationale": "First, the post contains informal forum markers like 'Edit:' and direct address ('Glad to hear your opinions'), which are typical of human conversational posts. Second, there are multiple typos and grammatical slips ('to much', mismatched parentheses around 'the economy') that a polished AI output wou... | Firstly, let's examine the overall structure and coherence of the text. The text appears to be a single paragraph discussing various points related to societal improvements and contributions from different fields. It starts with a general statement about the improvement of human lives through social and economic revolu... | {
"verdict": "HUMAN",
"analysis": "The post shows forum-specific markers ('Edit:', ' Glad to hear your opinions') and | {
"verdict": "HUMAN",
"analysis": "The post shows conversational forum behavior with explicit 'Edit:' markers, personal clarification, | {
"verdict": "HUMAN",
"analysis": "The post shows conversational forum behavior with explicit 'Edit' notes, direct replies, | {
"verdict": "HUMAN",
"analysis": "The passage shows forum-style markers ('Edit:', personal clarification, username-like opening) and | {"verdict":"AI"} | 0.009532 | HUMAN | 0.020588 | HUMAN | -3.388672 | HUMAN | 2.681641 | HUMAN | -1.648036 | HUMAN | 2.058681 | HUMAN | 0.995272 | HUMAN | -0.519531 | HUMAN | -0.108987 | HUMAN | 1.124424 | HUMAN | 0.996813 | AI | -28.40625 | HUMAN | -2.195313 | HUMAN | 0.057128 | HUMAN | 190 | 0.009532 | HUMAN | 0.020588 | HUMAN | -3.560547 | HUMAN | 3.189453 | HUMAN | -1.859611 | HUMAN | 1.914673 | HUMAN | 0.990034 | HUMAN | -0.736328 | HUMAN | -0.283066 | HUMAN | 1.106796 | HUMAN | 0.996813 | AI | -16.140625 | HUMAN | -1.782227 | HUMAN | 0.19164 | AI | 0.26 | HUMAN | 0.13 | HUMAN |
human_6 | MY VIEW HAS BEEN CHANGED We can breed bulls, so why shouldn't we be able to kill them too? They're definitely not the most self-aware, cutest, or smartest animals to be worrying about. If the bull in bull fighting was replaced with some more menial animal would more people feel better about killing it? Like a boar for ... | cmv | human | HUMAN | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {
"rationale": "First, the passage shows a casual, conversational tone with personal asides ('I just personally...') and forum-style phrasings ('This was copy and pasted from a [similar question]'), which are typical of human posts. Second, there are small inconsistencies, colloquial errors (e.g., 'house-hold' hyphen... | {
"rationale": "First, the passage shows informal, conversational phrasing, personal asides (I just personally...), and forum-style markers ('This was copy and pasted from a [similar question]') which are typical of human posts. Second, there are inconsistent grammar choices, colloquial word choices (house-hold), rep... | {
"rationale": "First, the passage shows forum-style markers (MY VIEW HAS BEEN CHANGED, '[similar question]') and casual phrasings common in human posts. Second, there are multiple typos and inconsistencies ('house-hold', mismatched commas, abrupt topic jump) suggesting spontaneous human typing rather than polished A... | {
"rationale": "First, the passage shows abrupt topic shifts, repetitive filler ('like a boar for example'), and bracketed self-referential text, patterns common in AI-generated outputs. Second, there are mechanical inconsistencies (ALL CAPS 'MY VIEW HAS BEEN CHANGED') and lack of coherent argument development sugges... | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {
"rationale": "First, the informal tone, rhetorical questions, colloquial phrasing (\"like a boar\", \"house-hold\") and explicit self-reference ('This was copy and pasted from a [similar question]') point to a casual forum post rather than polished AI output. Second, there are small grammatical slips and inconsiste... | Firstly, let's examine the language used in the text. The author uses informal language and colloquial expressions, which suggests a human writer rather than an AI system. For instance, phrases like "MY VIEW HAS BEEN CHANGED," "I just personally don't feel like," and "they're not either of those" indicate a conversatio... | {
"verdict": "HUMAN",
"analysis": "The passage shows colloquial, idiosyncratic phrasing, personal as | {
"verdict": "HUMAN",
"analysis": "The passage shows colloquial phrasing, personal anecdote ('This was copy and | {
"verdict": "HUMAN",
"analysis": "The text shows human-like patterns such as casual tone, personal aside ('This was copy | {
"verdict": "HUMAN",
"analysis": "The text shows human-like patterns of personal anecdote, forum-style phrasing ('This | {"verdict":"AI"} | 0.782762 | HUMAN | 0.02216 | HUMAN | -3.078125 | HUMAN | 2.414063 | HUMAN | -1.500127 | HUMAN | 2.015232 | HUMAN | 1.007344 | HUMAN | -0.541016 | HUMAN | 1.099374 | AI | 1.152632 | HUMAN | 0.945099 | AI | -25.46875 | HUMAN | -2.380859 | HUMAN | 0.076061 | AI | 198 | 0.782762 | HUMAN | 0.02216 | HUMAN | -3.380859 | HUMAN | 2.894531 | HUMAN | -1.752155 | HUMAN | 1.929544 | HUMAN | 1.002099 | HUMAN | -0.724609 | HUMAN | 0.146696 | HUMAN | 1.16129 | HUMAN | 0.945099 | AI | -14.484375 | HUMAN | -2.537109 | HUMAN | 0.18571 | AI | 0.42 | HUMAN | 0.16 | HUMAN |
human_7 | Bookmark: A strip of leather, cardboard, or other material used to mark one's place in a book. This CMV does not apply to e-readers, it's only about physical books, magazines, etc. When I read I like to mark my place in a book with one of my bookmarks; I've accumulated a very small collection over the years, though I d... | cmv | human | HUMAN | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {
"rationale": "First, the post has a conversational Reddit style with personal anecdotes, community markers ('CMV', 'Edit') and casual asides ('yay!') that match human forum behavior. Second, it shows idiosyncratic details, emotional nuance, and variable sentence length (e.g., 'All right, I've had my view changed') ... | {
"rationale": "First, the post has a conversational Reddit style with personal anecdotes, community markers ('CMV', 'Edit') and casual phrasings that match human forum posts. Second, it shows idiosyncratic details and emotional reactions (e.g., 'yay!') plus small inconsistencies and self-corrections typical of spont... | {
"rationale": "First, the post has a conversational Reddit style with personal anecdotes, community markers ('CMV', 'Edit'), and colloquial interjections ('yay!') typical of human forum posts. Second, it shows nuanced shifts in opinion, emotional engagement, and specific sensory details (local library hours, loving ... | {
"rationale": "First, the post has a highly conversational Reddit-style tone with personal anecdotes, community markers ('CMV', 'Edit'), and casual punctuation/typos that humans commonly produce. Second, it shows nuanced shifting in opinion, emotional engagement, and specific lived details (accumulated collection, l... | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {
"rationale": "First, the post has a conversational Reddit-style voice with explicit markers like 'CMV', 'Edit:', and direct thanks to commenters which strongly suggests a human forum submission. Second, it contains personal anecdotes, casual punctuation (e.g., 'yay!'), minor stylistic quirks and uneven phrasing ('u... | Firstly, the text follows a logical flow and provides coherent information about bookmarks. It starts with defining what a bookmark is and its purpose, then moves on to personal experiences and usage habits. The language is clear and consistent throughout.
Secondly, the text includes multiple examples and anecdotes to... | {
"verdict": "HUMAN",
"analysis": "The post shows personal anecdote, conversational tone, forum markers ('CMV', | {
"verdict": "HUMAN",
"analysis": "The post has a conversational Reddit style with personal anecdotes, community markers ('CMV | {
"verdict": "HUMAN",
"analysis": "The post has a conversational Reddit style with personal anecdotes, community markers ('CMV | {
"verdict": "HUMAN"
} | {"verdict":"AI"} | 0.000193 | HUMAN | 0.00171 | HUMAN | -2.365234 | HUMAN | 2.134766 | HUMAN | -1.096285 | HUMAN | 2.171262 | HUMAN | 1.023165 | HUMAN | -0.418945 | HUMAN | 1.359714 | AI | 1.023952 | HUMAN | 0.029393 | HUMAN | -29.765625 | HUMAN | -0.820801 | HUMAN | 0.090744 | AI | 425 | 0.000193 | HUMAN | 0.00171 | HUMAN | -2.642578 | HUMAN | 2.683594 | HUMAN | -1.289713 | HUMAN | 2.048966 | HUMAN | 1.013227 | HUMAN | -0.519531 | HUMAN | 0.665178 | AI | 0.982558 | HUMAN | 0.029393 | HUMAN | -16.765625 | HUMAN | 0.480469 | HUMAN | 0.269053 | AI | 0.13 | HUMAN | 0.25 | HUMAN |
human_9 | Quite simply, I believe that if you leave for Syria, you shouldn't expect to just waltz back to your home country like nothing's happened. Firstly, there is the very real risk that those jihadists will commit acts of domestic terrorism within their home countries. Security forces only have a finite amount of resources ... | cmv | human | HUMAN | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {
"rationale": "First, the text contains forum-specific markers (CMV, moderator footnote, bracketed links) and a conversational, context-rich tone typical of human online posts. Second, it shows idiosyncratic phrasings, small inconsistencies, and emotional emphasis ('I believe', exclamation) that are more characteris... | {
"rationale": "First, the post uses forum-specific conventions (CMV, moderator footnote with bracketed links, 'Happy CMVing!') and a conversational tone typical of human online posts. Second, it contains small stylistic inconsistencies and colloquial phrasings ('I cannot see why...') that AIs less often produce natu... | {
"rationale": "First, the post displays forum-specific markers (CMV, moderator footnote, bracketed links) and a conversational, context-aware tone typical of human online posts. Second, it contains small stylistic inconsistencies and colloquial phrasings ('I cannot see why...') suggesting spontaneous human writing r... | {
"rationale": "First, the post contains forum-specific markers (CMV, moderator footnote, bracketed links) and a conversational, context-rich tone typical of human online posts. Second, it shows small stylistic inconsistencies and personal phrasings ('I believe', 'waltz') suggesting spontaneous human writing rather t... | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {
"rationale": "First, the post uses informal, opinionated language and rhetorical devices (e.g., 'CMV!', 'waltz') typical of a human forum poster rather than polished AI prose. Second, it contains a verbatim-looking moderator footnote with bracketed link placeholders and subreddit-specific phrasing ('Hello, users of... | Firstly, let's examine the overall structure of the text. It appears to be a series of statements written in a conversational tone, addressing readers directly. There are multiple paragraphs, each starting with a greeting or reminder, indicating a structured format typical of a newsletter or forum post.
Secondly, we n... | {
"verdict": "HUMAN",
"analysis": "The text shows forum-specific markers (CMV, moderator footnote, bracketed links) | {
"verdict": "HUMAN",
"analysis": "The passage contains forum-specific markers (CMV, moderator footnote, bracketed links) | {
"verdict": "HUMAN",
"analysis": "The text shows forum-specific markers (CMV, moderator footnote, bracketed links) | {
"verdict": "HUMAN",
"analysis": "The text contains forum-specific markers (CMV, moderator footnote, bracketed links) | {"verdict":"AI"} | 0.000183 | HUMAN | 0.000514 | HUMAN | -2.529297 | HUMAN | 2.091797 | HUMAN | -1.180287 | HUMAN | 2.192009 | HUMAN | 1.025851 | HUMAN | -0.341797 | HUMAN | 0.819483 | AI | 1.112426 | HUMAN | 0.993661 | AI | -31.375 | HUMAN | -2.091797 | HUMAN | 0.109719 | AI | 330 | 0.000183 | HUMAN | 0.000514 | HUMAN | -2.947266 | HUMAN | 2.669922 | HUMAN | -1.516223 | HUMAN | 1.943821 | HUMAN | 1.01134 | HUMAN | -0.716797 | HUMAN | 0.462451 | HUMAN | 1.105263 | HUMAN | 0.993661 | AI | -21.921875 | HUMAN | -1.939453 | HUMAN | 0.232788 | AI | 0 | HUMAN | 0 | HUMAN |
human_10 | I ran my own small restaurant for 10 years and then started my own bookkeeping practice that caters to small businesses. In both the case of my restaurant, and in the case of my clients, property tax is always very minimal (typically 1000-3000 per year). Small businesses don't typically own a lot of property, most of t... | cmv | human | HUMAN | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {
"rationale": "First, the passage contains highly contextual, community-specific markers (CMV, moderator footnote, bracketed links) and a conversational, anecdotal voice consistent with human forum posts. Second, it shows idiosyncratic errors and stylistic inconsistencies—typos ('5000year'), odd spacing, mixed units... | {
"rationale": "First, the passage contains highly contextual, community-specific details (CMV, moderator footnote, bracketed links, personal anecdote) and casual forum phrasing typical of human posts. Second, there are typographic idiosyncrasies, inconsistent spacing/spacing patterns, and colloquial slips ('everyone... | {
"rationale": "First, the passage contains highly contextual, community-specific markers (CMV, moderator footnote, bracketed links) and colloquial phrasing consistent with a copied Reddit post rather than AI-generated generic text. Second, there are typographic idiosyncrasies and informal errors (e.g., '5000year', m... | {
"rationale": "First, the passage contains highly contextual, community-specific details (CMV, moderator footnote, bracketed links) and colloquial phrasing consistent with a copied Reddit post by a human. Second, there are typographic idiosyncrasies, inconsistent spacing/spacing patterns, and casual errors (e.g., '5... | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {
"rationale": "First, the passage contains personal anecdote, colloquial asides (e.g., \"not talking about FICA btw\"), and uneven punctuation/typos that resemble casual forum posts rather than polished AI output. Second, there are copy-paste artifacts and a moderator footnote specific to Reddit's CMV community, whi... | Firstly, let's consider the overall structure and coherence of the text. The text appears to be written in a conversational tone, discussing various aspects related to running a small business, including taxes. It starts with personal experiences and moves into broader discussions about taxation practices.
Secondly, e... | {
"verdict": "HUMAN",
"analysis": "The passage contains personal anecdote, colloquial phrasing, inconsistent formatting/ty | {
"verdict": "HUMAN",
"analysis": "The passage contains forum-specific markers (CMV, moderator footnote, bracketed links) | {
"verdict": "HUMAN",
"analysis": "The passage contains forum-specific markers (CMV, moderator footnote, bracketed links) | {
"verdict": "HUMAN",
"analysis": "The passage contains highly specific personal experience, colloquial phrasing, and a Reddit | {"verdict":"AI"} | 0.000178 | HUMAN | 0.000596 | HUMAN | -2.509766 | HUMAN | 2.185547 | HUMAN | -1.13534 | HUMAN | 2.187139 | HUMAN | 1.055006 | AI | -0.588867 | HUMAN | 1.772426 | AI | 1.070588 | HUMAN | 0.025065 | HUMAN | -26.765625 | HUMAN | -1.727539 | HUMAN | 0.132984 | AI | 511 | 0.000178 | HUMAN | 0.000596 | HUMAN | -2.789063 | HUMAN | 2.558594 | HUMAN | -1.361704 | HUMAN | 2.048215 | HUMAN | 1.058003 | AI | -0.681641 | HUMAN | 1.536114 | AI | 1.072727 | HUMAN | 0.025065 | HUMAN | -20.265625 | HUMAN | -2.015625 | HUMAN | 0.301185 | AI | 0 | HUMAN | 0 | HUMAN |
human_11 | Well, all too often there are evidence of the business world bending the way of the executive branch to a given course, or breaking the law and getting away with it easily (ex the 2008 people who worked in finance, judged in court and found culprit, mostly exonerated or got a meager punishment of a few monthsyears in p... | cmv | human | HUMAN | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {
"rationale": "First, the passage shows a highly conversational, idiosyncratic voice with typos, inconsistent capitalization, and forum-specific shorthand ('CMV') that match human online posting. Second, it contains personal hedging, self-deprecating asides, and uneven sentence-level errors ('easily (ex the...'), 'm... | {
"rationale": "First, the passage shows a highly conversational, forum-style voice with typos, inconsistent capitalization, and colloquialisms (e.g., 'Imo', 'CMV') typical of human posts. Second, it contains personal hedging, self-deprecating remarks, and uneven grammar ('there are evidence...'), suggesting spontane... | {
"rationale": "First, the passage shows a highly conversational, forum-style voice with typos, casual shorthand (e.g., 'CMV'), and inconsistent spacing/punctuation that are typical of human posts. Second, it contains personal hedging, self-deprecating remarks ('I just thought it up...'), and rhetorical uncertainty s... | {
"rationale": "First, the passage shows a highly conversational, forum-style voice with typos, casual shorthand (e.g., 'CMV'), and personal hedging ('I just thought it up') typical of human online posts. Second, it contains idiosyncratic errors and uneven punctuation/spacing ('monthsyears', misplaced spaces before q... | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {
"rationale": "First, the passage contains informal shorthand and typos (e.g., \"ex\" instead of \"except\", \"monthsyears\", lowercase \"i\") and inconsistent punctuation/capitalization that resemble casual human typing. Second, the voice is conversational, self-deprecating and uses forum-specific cues like \"CMV,\... | Firstly, let's examine the overall structure of the text. The author begins by discussing examples of how the business world influences government actions, which sets up their argument about separating these two entities. This structure follows a logical progression, making it more likely that this was written by a hum... | {
"verdict": "HUMAN",
"analysis": "The passage shows colloquial, idiosyncratic phrasing, inconsistent punctuation | {
"verdict": "HUMAN",
"analysis": "The passage shows colloquial, forum-style features (e.g., 'CMV | {
"verdict": "HUMAN",
"analysis": "The passage shows colloquial forum-style features (CMV, IMHO, paren | {
"verdict": "HUMAN",
"analysis": "The passage shows colloquial forum-style features (CMV, IMHO, parentheses | {"verdict":"AI"} | 0.000173 | HUMAN | 0.000709 | HUMAN | -3.611328 | HUMAN | 2.677734 | HUMAN | -1.754163 | HUMAN | 1.96125 | HUMAN | 1.025487 | HUMAN | -0.728516 | HUMAN | 0.806914 | AI | 1.22 | HUMAN | 0.050137 | HUMAN | -49.8125 | HUMAN | -4.683594 | HUMAN | 0.061813 | HUMAN | 300 | 0.000173 | HUMAN | 0.000709 | HUMAN | -3.617188 | HUMAN | 3.378906 | HUMAN | -1.901041 | HUMAN | 1.90274 | HUMAN | 1.017771 | AI | -0.794922 | HUMAN | 0.819853 | AI | 1.06422 | HUMAN | 0.050137 | HUMAN | -24.890625 | HUMAN | -1.380859 | HUMAN | 0.285486 | AI | 0.16 | HUMAN | 0.23 | HUMAN |
human_12 | I think the use of technology has greatly affected us all, in a positive way and I don't think people should try to "shield" their younger children from the use of technology. It can be used for entertainment purposes, I myself use it for Reddit and to watch movies or shows on Netflix and Hulu. It can be used for teach... | cmv | human | HUMAN | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {
"rationale": "First, the passage contains forum-specific markers (CMV, moderator footnote, bracketed links) and a conversational, anecdotal tone typical of human online posts. Second, there are small inconsistencies and colloquial phrasings ('I think... in a positive way' followed by personal detail) that AI rarely... | {
"rationale": "First, the passage contains forum-specific markers (CMV, moderator footnote, bracketed links) and a conversational, anecdotal tone typical of human online posts. Second, there are small inconsistencies and colloquial phrasings (e.g., 'I think... in a positive way' followed by personal detail) suggesti... | {
"rationale": "First, the passage contains forum-specific markers (CMV, moderator footnote, bracketed links) and a conversational, anecdotal tone typical of human online posts. Second, there are small inconsistencies and colloquial phrasings (e.g., 'I think... in a positive way' followed by personal detail) suggesti... | {
"rationale": "First, the passage contains forum-specific markers (CMV, moderator footnote, bracketed links) and a conversational, anecdotal tone consistent with human online posts. Second, there are small inconsistencies and colloquial phrasings (e.g., 'I think... in a positive way' followed by personal detail) sug... | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {
"rationale": "First, the passage contains informal, personal anecdotes and colloquial phrasing (e.g., \"I myself use it\", \"down with him\") consistent with a casual human poster. Second, there are small grammatical slips and idiosyncratic wording (\"watching...appropriate\", \"its wrong\") plus repetition that po... | Firstly, let's examine the language and tone of the text. The author uses casual, conversational language throughout, which suggests a human writer rather than an AI system. Additionally, there are informal abbreviations and misspellings (e.g., "users of CMV!"), which are common in written communication between friends... | {
"verdict": "HUMAN",
"analysis": "The text contains forum-specific markers (CMV, moderator footnote, bracketed links) | {
"verdict": "HUMAN",
"analysis": "The passage contains forum-specific markers (CMV, moderator footnote, bracketed links) | {
"verdict": "HUMAN",
"analysis": "The text contains forum-specific markers (CMV, moderator footnote, bracketed links) | {
"verdict": "HUMAN",
"analysis": "The text contains forum-specific markers (CMV, moderator footnote, bracketed links) | {"verdict":"AI"} | 0.000378 | HUMAN | 0.00058 | HUMAN | -2.505859 | HUMAN | 2.189453 | HUMAN | -1.134082 | HUMAN | 2.214642 | HUMAN | 1.021662 | HUMAN | -0.361328 | HUMAN | 0.871929 | AI | 1.027933 | HUMAN | 0.974731 | AI | -31.09375 | HUMAN | -0.594727 | HUMAN | 0.116725 | AI | 290 | 0.000378 | HUMAN | 0.00058 | HUMAN | -2.916016 | HUMAN | 2.650391 | HUMAN | -1.472072 | HUMAN | 1.980892 | HUMAN | 1.010433 | HUMAN | -0.888672 | HUMAN | 0.487794 | HUMAN | 1.087719 | HUMAN | 0.974731 | AI | -22.390625 | HUMAN | -1.863281 | HUMAN | 0.22956 | AI | 0 | HUMAN | 0 | HUMAN |
human_13 | I believe that people convicted and found guilty of violent crimes that were premeditated and life-altering for the victim andor the victim's family should be imprisoned for life without parole. For example: premeditated murder, breaking into someone's house to rape someone, kidnapping and sexual assaultmolestation, ar... | cmv | human | HUMAN | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {
"rationale": "First, the post contains forum-specific markers ('CMV', 'Edited') and personal edits ('Edit 2'), colloquial phrasing, and self-corrections that match human online posting patterns. Second, it shows idiosyncratic typos and inconsistent spacing ('andor', 'nopoor') plus nuanced, evolving opinion language... | {
"rationale": "First, the post has a highly conversational Reddit style (CMV, edited notes, personal edits) with colloquial phrasing and self-corrections that match human forum behavior. Second, it contains idiosyncratic typos and spacing issues ('andor', 'rape... molestation') and uneven punctuation suggesting spon... | {
"rationale": "First, the post has a highly conversational Reddit style (CMV, edited notes, personal edits) with colloquial phrasing and self-corrections typical of human forum posts. Second, it shows idiosyncratic typos and spacing errors ('andor', 'rape someone') and uneven punctuation that AIs rarely produce so n... | {
"rationale": "First, the post has a highly conversational Reddit style (CMV, edited notes, personal edits) with colloquial phrasing and self-corrections that match human forum behavior. Second, it contains idiosyncratic typos and spacing issues (e.g., 'andor', 'nopoor') and emotionally nuanced, shifting opinions th... | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {
"rationale": "First, the post contains forum-specific markers ('CMV', 'Edited') and personal edits ('Edit 2'), casual typos and nonstandard tokens like 'andor' and 'nopoor', which strongly resemble a human Reddit OP rather than polished AI output. Second, the writing shows uneven phrasing, self-doubt, hedging, and ... | Firstly, let's consider the overall structure and coherence of the text. The author begins by presenting a strong argument against releasing violent criminals who have been convicted and found guilty of premeditated and life-altering crimes. This sets the tone for the entire piece.
Secondly, we observe the extensive u... | {
"verdict": "HUMAN",
"analysis": "The post shows forum-specific markers ('CMV', 'Edited') and personal edits (' | {
"verdict": "HUMAN",
"analysis": "The post shows forum-specific markers ('CMV', 'Edited') and personal edits (' | {
"verdict": "HUMAN",
"analysis": "The post shows forum-specific markers ('CMV', 'Edited') and personal edits (' | {
"verdict": "HUMAN",
"analysis": "The post shows forum-specific markers (CMV, edited notes, personal edits) and | {"verdict":"AI"} | 0.000174 | HUMAN | 0.000632 | HUMAN | -2.304688 | HUMAN | 2.033203 | HUMAN | -1.088337 | HUMAN | 2.151714 | HUMAN | 1.06423 | AI | -0.429688 | HUMAN | 2.229073 | AI | 1.030303 | HUMAN | 0.020266 | HUMAN | -31.546875 | HUMAN | -1.03418 | HUMAN | 0.143064 | AI | 559 | 0.000174 | HUMAN | 0.000632 | HUMAN | -2.646484 | HUMAN | 2.513672 | HUMAN | -1.305378 | HUMAN | 2.027371 | HUMAN | 1.070414 | AI | -0.644531 | HUMAN | 2.116818 | AI | 1.055556 | HUMAN | 0.020266 | HUMAN | -21.828125 | HUMAN | -1.113281 | HUMAN | 0.318194 | AI | 0.02 | HUMAN | 0 | HUMAN |
human_14 | there have been many test done comparing the FPS of games running on AMD and Intel. They are using the same builds except for the processor and motherboard of course and the frames are generally the same. Yes Intel is more powerful single thread and some games get a couple more FPS. Also some games run better on AMD by... | cmv | human | HUMAN | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {
"rationale": "First, the passage has a conversational, forum-style tone with personal phrasings ('It just seems to me') and colloquial choices (lowercase 'there', missing commas) typical of human posts. Second, it shows uneven grammar and small factual slips ('many test done' and treating CPU and motherboard as ide... | {
"rationale": "First, the passage uses casual, conversational phrasing and personal opinion ('It just seems to me'), plus colloquial markers like contractions and missing hyphens, which are common in human forum posts. Second, it shows uneven grammar and small factual slips (e.g., 'there have been many test') sugges... | {
"rationale": "First, the passage uses casual, conversational phrasing and personal opinion ('It just seems to me'), plus colloquial markers like contractions and missing hyphens, suggesting human spontaneity. Second, it shows uneven grammar and minor factual slips (e.g., 'FPS ... running') rather than polished, con... | {
"rationale": "First, the passage has a casual forum-style tone, personal phrasing (e.g., 'It just seems to me'), and colloquial errors ('there have been many test done') suggesting spontaneous human writing. Second, it shows repetition, uneven sentence length, and small inconsistencies (using 'frames' for gameplay ... | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {
"rationale": "First, the passage uses informal, conversational phrasing and personal judgment (\"It just seems to me\") along with colloquial abbreviations like \"FPS\", which are typical of human forum posts. Second, it contains minor grammatical slips and inconsistent punctuation/currency notation (e.g., \"test d... | Firstly, let's examine the overall structure of the text. The text follows a logical flow, starting with a comparison between AMD and Intel processors, then discussing their performance in games, and concluding with a recommendation against buying Intel CPUs for gaming.
Secondly, we look at the language used. The auth... | {
"verdict": "HUMAN"
} | {
"verdict": "HUMAN",
"analysis": "The passage uses casual, conversational phrasing, personal opinion ('It just seems to | {
"verdict": "HUMAN"
} | {
"verdict": "HUMAN"
} | {"verdict":"AI"} | 0.000169 | HUMAN | 0.000486 | HUMAN | -2.521484 | HUMAN | 2.359375 | HUMAN | -1.230831 | HUMAN | 2.235102 | AI | 1.030416 | AI | -0.123047 | AI | 0.963866 | AI | 1.010753 | HUMAN | 0.030302 | HUMAN | -31.09375 | HUMAN | -0.289551 | HUMAN | 0.076876 | AI | 172 | 0.000169 | HUMAN | 0.000486 | HUMAN | -2.861328 | HUMAN | 2.992188 | HUMAN | -1.443424 | HUMAN | 1.982321 | HUMAN | 1.009963 | HUMAN | -0.308594 | AI | 0.471919 | HUMAN | 0.958333 | AI | 0.030302 | HUMAN | -18.09375 | HUMAN | 0.748535 | HUMAN | 0.180163 | AI | 0.6 | AI | 0.5 | AI |
human_15 | I was debating with another person about human inventions. one of the topics that came up was electricity. My belief is that humans invent electricity and without generating it, it would cease to exist instead of harvesting it such as water of wood. | cmv | human | HUMAN | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {
"rationale": "First, the passage shows casual, idiosyncratic phrasing and a personal anecdote ('I was debating...') typical of human conversational writing. Second, there are small stylistic inconsistencies (sentence-case 'one' after a comma) and colloquial choices ('water of wood') suggesting spontaneous human typ... | {
"rationale": "First, the message shows casual, conversational phrasing and a personal anecdote ('I was debating...'), which is typical of human forum posts. Second, there are small stylistic inconsistencies (sentence-case inconsistency, 'water of wood' phrasing) suggesting spontaneous typing rather than polished AI... | {
"rationale": "First, the message shows casual, conversational phrasing and a personal anecdote ('I was debating...'), which is typical of human forum posts. Second, there are small stylistic inconsistencies (sentence-case inconsistency, colloquial 'water of wood') suggesting spontaneous human typing rather than pol... | {
"rationale": "First, the message shows casual, conversational phrasing and a personal anecdote ('I was debating...'), which is typical of human posts. Second, there are small inconsistencies (lowercase 'one' after a period, colloquial 'water of wood') suggesting spontaneous typing rather than polished AI output. Mo... | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {
"rationale": "First, the informal tone, lowercase sentence start, and minor grammatical slip ('water of wood') point toward a casual human author rather than polished AI output. Second, the brief anecdotal framing and personal stance ('My belief is...') fit typical human conversational expression. Moreover, the phr... | Firstly, let's consider the style of writing. The text uses a formal tone and structured arguments, which suggests a human author rather than an AI system. Secondly, there are no apparent signs of artificial intelligence in terms of language patterns, abbreviations, or technical jargon. Lastly, the text demonstrates lo... | {
"verdict": "HUMAN",
"analysis": "The text shows casual, idiosyncratic phrasing and a personal anecdote | {
"verdict": "HUMAN",
"analysis": "The message shows casual, conversational phrasing and small inconsistencies (e.g., ' | {
"verdict": "HUMAN"
} | {
"verdict": "HUMAN"
} | {"verdict":"AI"} | 0.029959 | HUMAN | 0.050732 | HUMAN | -3.568359 | HUMAN | 2.40625 | HUMAN | -1.8322 | HUMAN | 2.186161 | HUMAN | 1 | HUMAN | -0.958984 | HUMAN | 0 | HUMAN | 1.282297 | HUMAN | 0.999342 | AI | -14.109375 | HUMAN | -2.621094 | HUMAN | 0.016593 | HUMAN | 82 | 0.029959 | HUMAN | 0.050732 | HUMAN | -3.722656 | HUMAN | 2.667969 | HUMAN | -1.976895 | HUMAN | 1.883083 | HUMAN | 1 | HUMAN | -1.232422 | HUMAN | 0 | HUMAN | 1.375723 | HUMAN | 0.999342 | AI | -12.984375 | HUMAN | -2.929688 | HUMAN | 0.104466 | HUMAN | 0.21 | HUMAN | 0.09 | HUMAN |
human_16 | Hey CMV, I'll keep this one simple. I believe that if someone is willing to forcefully take from another innocent person with the threatening use of a knife, gun, or other easily lethal weapon, they have no place in society and have a fundamental defect in their human brain chemistry (without even touching on the traum... | cmv | human | HUMAN | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {
"rationale": "First, the post includes highly contextual Reddit-specific markers (CMV, EDIT:, moderator footnote with bracketed links) and conversational, time-stamped phrasing typical of human forum posts. Second, it shows nuanced personal detail, emotional investment, and small inconsistencies/typos (e.g., 'LOADE... | {
"rationale": "First, the post includes highly contextual Reddit-specific markers (CMV, EDIT:, moderator footnote with bracketed links) and conversational, time-sensitive phrasing typical of human forum posts. Second, it shows small inconsistencies, personal nuance, and emotional emphasis ('To me', explicit caveats ... | {
"rationale": "First, the post contains highly contextual Reddit-specific markers (CMV, EDIT:, moderator footnote with bracketed links) and conversational, time-stamped phrasing typical of human forum posts. Second, there are small inconsistencies, personal hedging ('To me', willingness to admit this view is extreme... | {
"rationale": "First, the post contains highly contextual Reddit-specific markers (CMV, EDIT:, moderator footnote with bracketed links) and conversational, time-stamped phrasing typical of human forum posts. Second, it shows personal nuance, emotional investment, and small inconsistencies (redundancies, colloquialis... | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {
"rationale": "First, the post contains Reddit-specific markers (CMV, EDIT:, moderator footnote) and bracketed link placeholders that strongly resemble scraped forum copy rather than generative output. Second, the voice is conversational, emotionally charged, and includes small informal inconsistencies and rhetorica... | Firstly, let's examine the language and tone of the text. It uses formal language and includes technical terms related to criminal justice, suggesting it might be written by someone knowledgeable about law enforcement or legal proceedings.
Secondly, the text contains complex sentence structures typical of professional... | {
"verdict": "HUMAN",
"analysis": "The post contains forum-specific markers (CMV, EDIT:, moderator footnote with bracketed | {
"verdict": "HUMAN",
"analysis": "The post contains forum-specific markers (CMV, EDIT:, moderator footnote with bracketed | {
"verdict": "HUMAN",
"analysis": "The post contains highly specific Reddit conventions (CMV, EDIT:, moderator footnote with bracket | {
"verdict": "HUMAN",
"analysis": "The post contains highly specific Reddit conventions (CMV, EDIT:, moderator footnote with bracket | {"verdict":"AI"} | 0.000215 | HUMAN | 0.000471 | HUMAN | -2.533203 | HUMAN | 2.259766 | HUMAN | -1.146686 | HUMAN | 2.190864 | HUMAN | 1.036024 | AI | -0.261719 | AI | 1.089912 | AI | 1 | HUMAN | 0.033673 | HUMAN | -32.9375 | HUMAN | 0.215088 | HUMAN | 0.126579 | AI | 405 | 0.000215 | HUMAN | 0.000471 | HUMAN | -2.945313 | HUMAN | 2.773438 | HUMAN | -1.468638 | HUMAN | 2.005472 | HUMAN | 1.019414 | AI | -0.679688 | HUMAN | 0.630502 | AI | 1.055866 | HUMAN | 0.033673 | HUMAN | -17.515625 | HUMAN | -1.210938 | HUMAN | 0.268663 | AI | 0 | HUMAN | 0.12 | HUMAN |
human_17 | To at least clarify my position, I am a big believer in [Instant Run-Off Voting] , [objective based district boundaries] , and [proportional representation] with regards to the House of Representatives. The Senate though has a unique set-up where every state gets 2 Senators. While an amazing compromise 200 years ago wi... | cmv | human | HUMAN | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {
"rationale": "First, the post contains forum-specific markers ('Change My View', 'CMV') and a moderator footer with bracketed link placeholders that match human Reddit formatting. Second, it shows idiosyncratic phrasings, small factual slips, and personal hedging ('in my opinion') typical of human casual writing ra... | {
"rationale": "First, the post contains forum-specific markers ('Change My View', 'CMV') and a moderator footer with bracketed link placeholders that match human Reddit formatting. Second, it shows idiosyncratic phrasings, small factual slips (e.g., '6 Senators from Texas... represent the same number of people'), an... | {
"rationale": "First, the post shows forum-specific markers (CMV, moderator footnote, bracketed links) and a conversational, anecdotal voice typical of human online posts. Second, there are small stylistic inconsistencies, personal hedging ('in my opinion'), and idiosyncratic phrasings ('Back when states were...') s... | {
"rationale": "First, the post contains forum-specific markers (CMV, moderator footnote, bracketed links) and a conversational, anecdotal tone typical of human online posts. Second, there are small inconsistencies, colloquial phrasings, and rhetorical flourishes (e.g., 'Change My View' header, personal hedging) sugg... | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {
"rationale": "First, the post contains forum-specific markers ('Change My View', 'CMV') and a moderator footnote with bracketed link placeholders that strongly indicate a scraped Reddit thread rather than generated prose. Second, there are small grammatical slips, colloquial phrasing, and inconsistent formatting (e... | Firstly, let's consider the overall structure and coherence of the text. The text appears to be written in a conversational tone, using informal language and abbreviations. This suggests a human author rather than an AI system.
Secondly, we can observe the presence of multiple paragraphs discussing different aspects o... | {
"verdict": "HUMAN",
"analysis": "The passage contains forum-specific markers ('Change My View', 'CMV') and a | {
"verdict": "HUMAN",
"analysis": "The post shows forum-specific markers (CMV, moderator footnote, bracketed links, | {
"verdict": "HUMAN",
"analysis": "The post shows forum-specific markers (CMV, moderator footnote, bracketed links, | {
"verdict": "HUMAN",
"analysis": "The post shows forum-specific markers (CMV, moderator footnote, bracketed links) | {"verdict":"AI"} | 0.000183 | HUMAN | 0.00077 | HUMAN | -2.884766 | HUMAN | 2.378906 | HUMAN | -1.398216 | HUMAN | 2.050869 | HUMAN | 1.045334 | AI | -0.494141 | HUMAN | 1.452787 | AI | 1.152174 | HUMAN | 0.008056 | HUMAN | -36.625 | HUMAN | -3.509766 | HUMAN | 0.135236 | AI | 600 | 0.000183 | HUMAN | 0.00077 | HUMAN | -3.191406 | HUMAN | 2.945313 | HUMAN | -1.646129 | HUMAN | 1.938734 | HUMAN | 1.038483 | AI | -0.785156 | HUMAN | 1.397788 | AI | 1.082902 | HUMAN | 0.008056 | HUMAN | -32.59375 | HUMAN | -1.921875 | HUMAN | 0.346503 | AI | 0.04 | HUMAN | 0.07 | HUMAN |
human_18 | So, I've been seeing pretty quiet to those I know regarding this, but I feel that I need to actually put out there why I feel the way I feel. Cases that make me view PETA as a group no better than those it protests: 1) -This in and of itself shows to me that PETA is offering an unacceptable alternative to the shelters ... | cmv | human | HUMAN | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {
"rationale": "First, the passage contains forum-specific markers (CMV, Edit: Typos, moderator footnote with bracketed links) and conversational, context-dependent phrasing typical of human online posts. Second, it shows personal anecdote, emotional nuance, inconsistent punctuation/spacing, and small errors that AIs... | {
"rationale": "First, the passage contains forum-specific markers (CMV, Edit: Typos, moderator footnote with bracketed links) and conversational, context-dependent phrasing typical of human online posts. Second, it shows personal anecdote, emotional nuance, inconsistent spacing/ellipses, and small errors that AIs ra... | {
"rationale": "First, the passage contains forum-specific markers (CMV, Edit: Typos, moderator footnote with bracketed links) and conversational, context-dependent phrasing typical of human online posts. Second, it shows personal anecdote, emotional nuance, inconsistent spacing/ellipses, and small errors that AIs ra... | {
"rationale": "First, the passage contains forum-specific markers (CMV, Edit: Typos, moderator footnote with bracketed links) and conversational, context-dependent phrasing typical of human online posts. Second, it shows personal anecdote, emotional nuance, and inconsistent punctuation/spacing that humans commonly p... | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {
"rationale": "First, the post contains informal, idiosyncratic phrasing (e.g., \"quiet to those I know\", repeated \"I feel\") and community-specific markers like \"CMV\" and an edit thanking \"Typos,\" which strongly resemble a real Reddit user's voice. Second, the appended moderator footnote with bracketed links ... | Firstly, let's consider the overall structure and coherence of the text. The text appears to be written in a conversational tone, using informal language and abbreviations (e.g., "So," "I've been seeing," "don't offer"). This suggests a human author rather than an AI system.
Secondly, we should examine the content and... | {
"verdict": "HUMAN",
"analysis": "The post contains context-specific Reddit markers (CMV, Edit: Typos, moderator | {
"verdict": "HUMAN",
"analysis": "The post contains context-specific Reddit markers (CMV, Edit: Typos, moderator | {
"verdict": "HUMAN",
"analysis": "The post contains context-specific Reddit markers (CMV, Edit: Typos, moderator | {
"verdict": "HUMAN",
"analysis": "The post contains context-specific Reddit markers (CMV, Edit: Typos, moderator | {"verdict":"AI"} | 0.825693 | HUMAN | 0.032626 | HUMAN | -2.982422 | HUMAN | 2.296875 | HUMAN | -1.432579 | HUMAN | 2.055173 | HUMAN | 1.01464 | HUMAN | -0.388672 | HUMAN | 0.810291 | AI | 1.112299 | HUMAN | 0.959294 | AI | -25.765625 | HUMAN | -2.287109 | HUMAN | 0.112682 | AI | 327 | 0.825693 | HUMAN | 0.032626 | HUMAN | -3.240234 | HUMAN | 2.859375 | HUMAN | -1.719377 | HUMAN | 1.884539 | HUMAN | 1.011193 | HUMAN | -0.564453 | HUMAN | 0.67358 | AI | 1.125 | HUMAN | 0.959294 | AI | -19.796875 | HUMAN | -2.550781 | HUMAN | 0.266383 | AI | 0 | HUMAN | 0.04 | HUMAN |
human_19 | First, this is my first post to CMV, so I apologize if I do anything incorrectly. As a young student recently gaining the ability to vote, I quite frankly have no idea what is going on in the modern political system. I see D and R (democrats and republics, I will just shorten them to D and R) continuously arguing over ... | cmv | human | HUMAN | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {
"rationale": "First, the post shows a highly conversational, forum-specific voice with personal details, rhetorical questions, and emotional interjections ('What?') that match human casual posting. Second, there are idiosyncratic errors and stylistic quirks—misused 'its' for 'it's', inconsistent capitalization, par... | {
"rationale": "First, the post shows a highly conversational, forum-specific voice with personal details (\"my first post to CMV\", 'SOLELY') and casual typos/idioms ('the such', 'CMV') typical of human Reddit posts. Second, it contains inconsistent punctuation, emotional interjections ('What?'), and uneven sentence... | {
"rationale": "First, the post shows a highly conversational, forum-specific voice with personal details, rhetorical questions, and emotional interjections ('What?') typical of human Reddit posts. Second, there are idiosyncratic errors and informal choices—awkward parenthetical clarifications, inconsistent spacing, ... | {
"rationale": "First, the post shows a highly conversational, forum-specific voice with personal details (\"my first post to CMV\", 'SOLELY') and emotional interjections ('What?'), suggesting spontaneous human posting. Second, there are typographical inconsistencies, colloquialisms ('the such', uneven capitalization... | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {
"rationale": "First, the post uses informal, emotionally charged language, rhetorical questions, profanity, and uneven punctuation that match spontaneous forum posts rather than polished AI output. Second, there are small grammatical slips, inconsistent capitalization (e.g., 'D and R'), and colloquialisms ('the suc... | Firstly, the text exhibits a formal tone and structured format typical of written communication, suggesting it could be from a human writer.
Secondly, there are numerous spelling and grammatical errors present throughout the text, indicating it was likely composed by a non-native English speaker or someone unfamiliar ... | {
"verdict": "HUMAN",
"analysis": "First, the post shows a highly conversational, forum-specific voice with personal details ( | {
"verdict": "HUMAN",
"analysis": "First, the post shows a highly conversational, forum-specific voice with personal details ( | {
"verdict": "HUMAN",
"analysis": "First, the post shows a highly conversational, forum-specific voice with personal details ( | {
"verdict": "HUMAN",
"analysis": "First, the post shows a highly conversational, forum-specific voice with personal details ( | {"verdict":"AI"} | 0.00019 | HUMAN | 0.000523 | HUMAN | -2.787109 | HUMAN | 2.417969 | HUMAN | -1.339754 | HUMAN | 2.13958 | HUMAN | 1.045338 | AI | -0.578125 | HUMAN | 2.016804 | AI | 1.121053 | HUMAN | 0.010727 | HUMAN | -46.46875 | HUMAN | -3.386719 | HUMAN | 0.020233 | HUMAN | 502 | 0.00019 | HUMAN | 0.000523 | HUMAN | -3.111328 | HUMAN | 2.988281 | HUMAN | -1.589617 | HUMAN | 1.957281 | HUMAN | 1.03556 | AI | -0.8125 | HUMAN | 1.520599 | AI | 1.041885 | HUMAN | 0.010727 | HUMAN | -30.125 | HUMAN | -0.79834 | HUMAN | 0.320299 | AI | 0.06 | HUMAN | 0.23 | HUMAN |
human_20 | I simply cringe whenever right wing xenophobes in America suggest building a 2,000 mile Great Wall of Mexico to keep out "illegal wetbacks." We're talking a 20-foot metal and concrete barrier erected for multiple billions of taxpayer dollars, that could be easily bypassed by cunning traffickers with ladders, shovels, b... | cmv | human | HUMAN | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {
"rationale": "First, the passage contains forum-specific markers (CMV, moderator footnote, bracketed links) and a conversational, context-rich tone typical of human online posts. Second, it shows idiosyncratic phrasings, rhetorical flourishes ('Where there's a will...'), and mild inconsistencies that suggest sponta... | {
"rationale": "First, the passage contains forum-specific markers (CMV, moderator footnote, bracketed links) and a conversational, context-rich tone typical of human online posts. Second, it shows idiosyncratic phrasings, rhetorical flourishes ('Where there's a will...'), and mild inconsistencies that suggest sponta... | {
"rationale": "First, the passage contains forum-specific markers (CMV, moderator footnote, bracketed links) and a conversational, context-rich tone typical of human online posts. Second, it shows idiosyncratic phrasings, rhetorical flourishes ('Where there's a will...'), and mild stylistic inconsistencies suggestin... | {
"rationale": "First, the passage contains forum-specific markers (CMV, moderator footnote, bracketed links) and a conversational, emotionally charged tone typical of human online posts. Second, it shows idiosyncratic phrasings ('Where there's a will, there's a way') and uneven structure with abrupt transitions sugg... | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {
"rationale": "First, the passage combines a personal, emotionally charged opinion with a clearly distinct moderator boilerplate (bracketed links, community-specific phrasing), which strongly resembles copy-pasted Reddit formatting rather than typical AI output. Second, the colloquial voice, rhetorical flourishes ('... | Firstly, let's examine the language used in the text. The author uses formal and complex vocabulary, including phrases like "right wing xenophobes," "illegal wetbacks," and "wetback," which suggests a high level of education and sophistication. These terms are typically associated with political discourse rather than c... | {
"verdict": "HUMAN",
"analysis": "The passage shows forum-specific markers (CMV, moderator footnote, bracketed links) | {
"verdict": "HUMAN",
"analysis": "The passage shows forum-specific markers (a moderator footnote with bracketed links, community shorthand | {
"verdict": "HUMAN",
"analysis": "The passage shows forum-specific markers (CMV shorthand, moderator footnote, bracketed link | {
"verdict": "HUMAN",
"analysis": "The passage contains forum-specific markers (CMV, moderator footnote, bracketed links) | {"verdict":"AI"} | 0.000171 | HUMAN | 0.000462 | HUMAN | -2.630859 | HUMAN | 2.050781 | HUMAN | -1.238283 | HUMAN | 2.124647 | HUMAN | 1.015365 | HUMAN | -0.552734 | HUMAN | 1.053482 | AI | 1.125749 | HUMAN | 0.927863 | AI | -20.90625 | HUMAN | -2.083984 | HUMAN | 0.098976 | AI | 293 | 0.000171 | HUMAN | 0.000462 | HUMAN | -2.933594 | HUMAN | 2.564453 | HUMAN | -1.523404 | HUMAN | 1.925684 | HUMAN | 1.013025 | HUMAN | -0.726563 | HUMAN | 0.542869 | HUMAN | 1.145455 | HUMAN | 0.927863 | AI | -18.390625 | HUMAN | -2.4375 | HUMAN | 0.226845 | AI | 0 | HUMAN | 0.04 | HUMAN |
human_21 | There are two industries in particular that I feel should be at the very least standardized throughout the USA. The first is the clothing industry. From pants to shoes to shirts, sizing is incredibly varied. I bought a pair of Dockers corduroys in size 32x30 and they fit me very nicely, meanwhile a pair of Levi 505 I a... | cmv | human | HUMAN | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {
"rationale": "First, the passage contains highly contextual, community-specific markers (TL;DR, 'users of CMV', moderator footnote with bracketed links) and casual, anecdotal phrasing typical of human forum posts. Second, there are small inconsistencies, personal details (specific brand sizes, girlfriend's licensin... | {
"rationale": "First, the post shows forum-specific markers (TL;DR, 'CMV', moderator footnote with bracketed links) and casual, anecdotal phrasing typical of human online posts. Second, there are small inconsistencies, personal details (specific brand sizes, girlfriend's licensing), and conversational redundancies (... | {
"rationale": "First, the post shows forum-specific markers (TL;DR, CMV moderator footnote with bracketed links) and casual, anecdotal phrasing typical of human online posts. Second, there are small inconsistencies, colloquialisms ('I bought...'), and personal details (specific brand sizes, girlfriend's licensing) s... | {
"rationale": "First, the post shows forum-specific markers (TL;DR, CMV moderator footnote with bracketed links) and casual, anecdotal phrasing typical of human online posts. Second, there are small inconsistencies, colloquialisms, and personal details (specific brand sizes, girlfriend's licensing) suggesting lived ... | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {
"rationale": "First, the post contains personal anecdotes, colloquial phrasing (e.g., \"TL:DR\"), and small inconsistencies like missing hyphens and casual tone that match human forum posts. Second, the inclusion of a moderator footnote with bracketed links and subreddit-specific cues strongly suggests this was cop... | Firstly, let's examine the language and tone of the text. It appears to be written in a casual, conversational manner, using informal abbreviations (e.g., "TL:DR") and colloquial expressions ("I feel"). This suggests a human author rather than an AI system.
Secondly, we need to consider the structure of the text. Whil... | {
"verdict": "HUMAN",
"analysis": "The post shows personal anecdotes, casual tone, forum-specific markers (TL;DR, | {
"verdict": "HUMAN",
"analysis": "The post shows forum-specific markers (TL;DR, CMV moderator footnote with bracket | {
"verdict": "HUMAN",
"analysis": "The post shows forum-specific markers (TL;DR, CMV moderator footnote with bracket | {
"verdict": "HUMAN",
"analysis": "The post shows forum-specific markers (TL;DR, CMV moderator footnote with bracket | {"verdict":"AI"} | 0.000239 | HUMAN | 0.000669 | HUMAN | -2.257813 | HUMAN | 2.109375 | HUMAN | -1.021421 | HUMAN | 2.216399 | AI | 1.023465 | HUMAN | -0.433594 | HUMAN | 1.035274 | AI | 0.994152 | HUMAN | 0.11912 | AI | -20.75 | HUMAN | 0.061005 | HUMAN | 0.16104 | AI | 407 | 0.000239 | HUMAN | 0.000669 | HUMAN | -2.648438 | HUMAN | 2.470703 | HUMAN | -1.255829 | HUMAN | 2.108916 | HUMAN | 1.020892 | AI | -0.59375 | HUMAN | 0.891741 | AI | 1.062893 | HUMAN | 0.11912 | AI | -18.171875 | HUMAN | -1.354492 | HUMAN | 0.25449 | AI | 0.01 | HUMAN | 0 | HUMAN |
human_22 | I think that all people who propose an anti-evolution viewpoint are people who either willingly or unwillingly don't understand what evolution is. The way that evolution works is simple common sense when explained, and to reject it if one understands it would make about as much sense as rejecting an explanation of how ... | cmv | human | HUMAN | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {
"rationale": "First, the passage uses a conversational, personal voice with contractions and specific analogies (internal combustion engine, anti-evolution viewpoint) that read like lived-experience writing. Second, it shows small stylistic inconsistencies and emphatic repetition ('people... people') typical of spo... | {
"rationale": "First, the passage uses a conversational, personal voice with contractions (e.g., 'I think') and specific analogies ('internal combustion engine works'), which are typical of human forum posts. Second, it shows small stylistic inconsistencies and repetition ('people... are ... don't understand') sugge... | {
"rationale": "First, the passage uses a conversational, personal voice with contractions and colloquial phrasings (e.g., 'I think', 'left out of the loop') suggesting a human author. Second, it shows minor stylistic inconsistencies and emotional emphasis ('simple common sense...') rather than uniformly polished AI-... | {
"rationale": "First, the passage uses a conversational, personal voice with contractions and colloquial phrasing (e.g., 'I think' and 'left out of the loop'), suggesting a human author. Second, it contains small stylistic inconsistencies and repetition ('simple common sense...') rather than polished, overly generic... | {"verdict": "HUMAN"} | {
"rationale": "First, the passage uses conversational markers (\"I think\", \"don't understand\") and colloquial phrasing like \"left out of the loop,\" which are typical of human writing. Second, there are small grammatical slips and redundancies (e.g., \"either...or\" instead of \"neither...nor\", repeated use of ... | First, let's consider the overall structure of the text. It follows a logical argumentative structure, starting with a general statement about those who oppose evolution, then elaborating on why they might hold this view. This structure suggests a human writer rather than an AI system.
Second, the language used is cle... | {
"verdict": "HUMAN"
} | {
"verdict": "HUMAN"
} | {
"verdict": "HUMAN"
} | {
"verdict": "HUMAN"
} | {"verdict":"AI"} | 0.092215 | HUMAN | 0.000537 | HUMAN | -2.513672 | HUMAN | 2.335938 | HUMAN | -1.233101 | HUMAN | 2.083835 | HUMAN | 1.007095 | HUMAN | -0.3125 | HUMAN | 0.578616 | HUMAN | 1.038043 | HUMAN | 0.497584 | AI | -20.921875 | HUMAN | -0.388428 | HUMAN | 0.058432 | HUMAN | 134 | 0.092215 | HUMAN | 0.000537 | HUMAN | -2.769531 | HUMAN | 2.800781 | HUMAN | -1.339049 | HUMAN | 2.068282 | HUMAN | 1.014486 | AI | -0.646484 | HUMAN | 0.377538 | HUMAN | 0.983425 | HUMAN | 0.497584 | AI | -13.851563 | HUMAN | 0.258545 | HUMAN | 0.127171 | AI | 0.19 | HUMAN | 0.13 | HUMAN |
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio
README.md exists but content is empty.
- Downloads last month
- 7