The full dataset viewer is not available (click to read why). Only showing a preview of the rows.
Error code: JobManagerCrashedError
Need help to make the dataset viewer work? Make sure to review how to configure the dataset viewer, and open a discussion for direct support.
input image | output image |
|---|---|
YAML Metadata Warning:empty or missing yaml metadata in repo card
Check out the documentation for more information.
DESCAN-18K
DESCAN-18K is a dataset for the descanning task. This dataset contains 18,360 paired real scanned/original images for recovering original digital images from their real scanned counterparts.
Overview
DESCAN-18K is a dataset for the descanning task: recovering the original digital image from a real scanned page. This dataset supports that task with large-scale real scanned/original pairs collected from real scanners and original digital pages.
DESCAN-18K's key characteristics:
- Real paired data: each
scan/cleanpair comes from a real scanned page and its corresponding original digital page - New task setting: the work explicitly defines descanning as its own restoration problem
- Cross-scanner evaluation: the test set uses scanner models not seen during training
- Mixed degradations: color distortion, bleed-through, halftone, texture distortion, and scanner noise often co-occur
- Scale:
18,360aligned pairs across four real-world scanners - Format: RGB TIFF images at
1024 x 1024 - Content diversity: photographs, graphics, layouts, and text-heavy magazine pages
Each sample contains:
| Folder | Contents |
|---|---|
scan/ |
Real scanned page image (model input) |
clean/ |
Corresponding original digital page image (target) |
The core dataset consists of real scanned/original pairs. Synthetic data appears in the paper only as an additional training augmentation strategy for the DescanDiffusion+ model variant.
Descanning Process Overview
The figure below shows the descanning process: a digital image is printed, scanned, and then restored back toward its original digital form through descanning.
Dataset Statistics
The table below follows the paper-reported split sizes.
| Split | Scanners | Paper-Reported Pairs |
|---|---|---|
| Train | scanner3, scanner4 | 17,640 |
| Valid | scanner3, scanner4 | 360 |
| Test | scanner1, scanner2 | 360 |
| Total | - | 18,360 |
Scanner IDs
| ID | Scanner Model | Split |
|---|---|---|
| scanner1 | Fuji Xerox ApeosPort C2060 | Test only |
| scanner2 | Canon imagePRESS C650 | Test only |
| scanner3 | Canon imageRUNNER ADVANCE 6265 | Train / Valid |
| scanner4 | Plustek OpticBook 4800 | Train / Valid |
Training and validation use scanner3 and scanner4. The test set uses scanner1 and scanner2, which are unseen during training and therefore support cross-scanner generalization evaluation.
Data Structure
DESCAN-18K-dataset/
|-- Train/
| |-- scan/ # real scanned page images used as model inputs
| `-- clean/ # aligned original digital target images
|-- Valid/
| |-- scan/ # validation scanned images
| `-- clean/ # validation original targets
|-- Test/
| |-- scan/ # unseen-scanner scanned images for evaluation
| `-- clean/ # corresponding original targets
`-- README.md
Each file in scan/ has a same-named counterpart in clean/.
| Path | Role |
|---|---|
Train/scan |
Degraded real scanned inputs for training |
Train/clean |
Paired original digital targets for training |
Valid/scan |
Scanned validation inputs |
Valid/clean |
Paired validation targets |
Test/scan |
Scanned test inputs from unseen scanners |
Test/clean |
Paired test targets |
File Naming
| Split | Convention | Example |
|---|---|---|
Train/ |
Source-document style | BookOfMaking.00001.01.tif |
Valid/ |
Scanner-based | scanner03_000.tif |
Test/ |
Scanner-based | scanner01_000.tif |
All images are stored as TIFF files (.tif).
Source and Construction
According to the paper, DESCAN-18K was built from 11 magazine types from the Raspberry Pi Foundation, licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0. The pages contain diverse image and text content and had preservation durations ranging from a few days to seven years.
The paper describes the construction pipeline as follows:
- Magazine pages were manually scanned with four scanner models.
- Corresponding original PDF pages were collected online.
- Both scanned and original data were converted to RGB TIFF.
- Page pairs were aligned with AKAZE registration.
- Poor matches were manually filtered.
- The aligned pages were randomly cropped to
1024 x 1024. - The cropped pairs were registered again with AKAZE to secure aligned patch pairs.
The paper also states that scanned TIFF images were calibrated under the IT 8.7 / ISO 12641 standard.
Degradation Types
The paper identifies six representative degradation types in DESCAN-18K. These often appear in combination within the same sample.
| # | Degradation | Description from the paper |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Color transition | Global color fading, saturation change, or altered color tone |
| 2 | External noise | Dots or localized stains caused by foreign substances |
| 3 | Internal noise | Scanner-generated crumpled, curved, or laser-like artifacts |
| 4 | Bleed-through effect | Back-page contents becoming visible in the scan |
| 5 | Texture distortion | Global physical textures or wrinkle-like artifacts |
| 6 | Halftone pattern | Printing-induced CMYK dot structures |
Intended Use
DESCAN-18K is intended for paired descanning research and evaluation:
- Input: scanned image from
scan/ - Target: original image from
clean/
It can be used for developing, benchmarking, and analyzing methods that recover original digital images from real scanned pages. The scanner-based split is especially useful for evaluating generalization to unseen scanner types.
Why this dataset matters:
- It is built from real scanned pages, not only synthetic corruption pipelines.
- It provides direct paired supervision between scanned inputs and original digital targets.
- It explicitly supports the newly defined descanning task.
- It includes a test split from unseen scanner models.
Reported Benchmark Results
The following results are reported in Table 1 of the paper on the original DESCAN-18K testing set.
| Method | PSNR (dB) | SSIM | LPIPS | FID |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pix2PixHD | 20.58 | 0.8014 | 0.057 | 18.30 |
| CycleGAN | 21.52 | 0.8417 | 0.050 | 16.99 |
| HDRUNet | 20.90 | 0.8480 | 0.055 | 16.42 |
| Restormer | 20.37 | 0.7915 | 0.152 | 25.57 |
| ESDNet | 21.22 | 0.8418 | 0.088 | 15.24 |
| NAFNet | 22.03 | 0.8538 | 0.048 | 16.00 |
| OPR* | 18.09 | 0.7249 | 0.158 | 21.45 |
| DPS* | 17.93 | 0.7354 | 0.150 | 41.64 |
| Clear Scan | 21.46 | 0.8183 | 0.054 | 18.09 |
| Adobe Scan | 15.80 | 0.6153 | 0.141 | 23.55 |
| Microsoft Lens | 20.48 | 0.8013 | 0.056 | 18.97 |
| DescanDiffusion | 23.40 | 0.8717 | 0.042 | 13.51 |
| DescanDiffusion+ | 23.43 | 0.8736 | 0.044 | 14.60 |
* Methods with an asterisk are official pre-trained versions used by the paper authors.
The paper states that the DescanDiffusion variants outperform competing methods and commercial products on the DESCAN-18K test set. Within Table 1, DescanDiffusion+ has the best PSNR and SSIM, while DescanDiffusion has the best LPIPS and FID.
Citation
If you use DESCAN-18K in your research, please cite:
@article{cha2024descanning,
title={Descanning: From Scanned to the Original Images with a Color Correction Diffusion Model},
author={Cha, Junghun and Haider, Ali and Yang, Seoyun and Jin, Hoeyeong and Yang, Subin
and Uddin, AFM and Kim, Jaehyoung and Kim, Soo Ye and Bae, Sung-Ho},
journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.05350},
year={2024}
}
References
| Resource | Link |
|---|---|
| Paper | https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.05350 |
| Code | https://github.com/jhcha08/Descanning |
| Lab | https://mlvc.khu.ac.kr/ |
- Downloads last month
- 42
