text stringlengths 52 13.9k | anchor stringlengths 52 13.9k | positive stringclasses 2
values | negative stringclasses 2
values |
|---|---|---|---|
i rented i am curious yellow from my video store because of all the controversy that surrounded it when it was first released in 1967. i also heard that at first it was seized by u. s. customs if it ever tried to enter this country and therefore being a fan of films considered controversial i really had to see this for... | i rented i am curious yellow from my video store because of all the controversy that surrounded it when it was first released in 1967. i also heard that at first it was seized by u. s. customs if it ever tried to enter this country and therefore being a fan of films considered controversial i really had to see this for... | This is a semantically negative review. | This is a semantically positive review. |
i am curious represent yellow is a risible and pretentious steaming pile. it doesn not matter what one political views are because this film can hardly be taken seriously on any level. as for the claim that frontal male nudity is an automatic nc 17 and that isn not true. i have seen r rated films with male nudity. gran... | i am curious represent yellow is a risible and pretentious steaming pile. it doesn not matter what one political views are because this film can hardly be taken seriously on any level. as for the claim that frontal male nudity is an automatic nc 17 and that isn not true. i have seen r rated films with male nudity. gran... | This is a semantically negative review. | This is a semantically positive review. |
if only to avoid making this type of film in the future. this film is interesting as an experiment but tells no cogent story. one might feel virtuous for sitting thru it because it touches on so many important issues but it does so without any discernable motive. the viewer comes away with no new perspectives (unless o... | if only to avoid making this type of film in the future. this film is interesting as an experiment but tells no cogent story. one might feel virtuous for sitting thru it because it touches on so many important issues but it does so without any discernable motive. the viewer comes away with no new perspectives (unless o... | This is a semantically negative review. | This is a semantically positive review. |
this film was probably inspired by godard masculin and féminin and i urge you to see that film instead. the film has two strong elements and those are and (1) the realistic acting (2) the impressive and undeservedly good and photo. apart from that and what strikes me most is the endless stream of silliness. lena nyman ... | this film was probably inspired by godard masculin and féminin and i urge you to see that film instead. the film has two strong elements and those are and (1) the realistic acting (2) the impressive and undeservedly good and photo. apart from that and what strikes me most is the endless stream of silliness. lena nyman ... | This is a semantically negative review. | This is a semantically positive review. |
oh and brother. after hearing about this ridiculous film for umpteen years all i can think of is that old peggy lee song. is that all there is. . i was just an early teen when this smoked fish hit the u. s. i was too young to get in the theater (although i did manage to sneak into goodbye columbus). then a screening at... | oh and brother. after hearing about this ridiculous film for umpteen years all i can think of is that old peggy lee song. is that all there is. . i was just an early teen when this smoked fish hit the u. s. i was too young to get in the theater (although i did manage to sneak into goodbye columbus). then a screening at... | This is a semantically negative review. | This is a semantically positive review. |
i would put this at the top of my list of films in the category of unwatchable trash. there are films that are bad and but the worst kind are the ones that are unwatchable but you are suppose to like them because they are supposed to be good for you. the sex sequences and so shocking in its day and couldn not even arou... | i would put this at the top of my list of films in the category of unwatchable trash. there are films that are bad and but the worst kind are the ones that are unwatchable but you are suppose to like them because they are supposed to be good for you. the sex sequences and so shocking in its day and couldn not even arou... | This is a semantically negative review. | This is a semantically positive review. |
whoever wrote the screenplay for this movie obviously never consulted any books about lucille ball and especially her autobiography. i have never seen so many mistakes in a biopic and ranging from her early years in celoron and jamestown to her later years with desi. i could write a whole list of factual errors and but... | whoever wrote the screenplay for this movie obviously never consulted any books about lucille ball and especially her autobiography. i have never seen so many mistakes in a biopic and ranging from her early years in celoron and jamestown to her later years with desi. i could write a whole list of factual errors and but... | This is a semantically negative review. | This is a semantically positive review. |
when i first saw a glimpse of this movie and i quickly noticed the actress who was playing the role of lucille ball. rachel york portrayal of lucy is absolutely awful. lucille ball was an astounding comedian with incredible talent. to think about a legend like lucille ball being portrayed the way she was in the movie i... | when i first saw a glimpse of this movie and i quickly noticed the actress who was playing the role of lucille ball. rachel york portrayal of lucy is absolutely awful. lucille ball was an astounding comedian with incredible talent. to think about a legend like lucille ball being portrayed the way she was in the movie i... | This is a semantically negative review. | This is a semantically positive review. |
who are these they the actors. the filmmakers. certainly couldn not be the audience this is among the most air puffed productions in existence. it the kind of movie that looks like it was a lot of fun to shoot too much fun and nobody is getting any actual work done and and that almost always makes for a movie that no ... | who are these they the actors. the filmmakers. certainly couldn not be the audience this is among the most air puffed productions in existence. it the kind of movie that looks like it was a lot of fun to shoot too much fun and nobody is getting any actual work done and and that almost always makes for a movie that no ... | This is a semantically negative review. | This is a semantically positive review. |
this is said to be a personal film for peter bogdonavitch. he based it on his life but changed things around to fit the characters and who are detectives. these detectives date beautiful models and have no problem getting them. sounds more like a millionaire playboy filmmaker than a detective and doesn not it. this ent... | this is said to be a personal film for peter bogdonavitch. he based it on his life but changed things around to fit the characters and who are detectives. these detectives date beautiful models and have no problem getting them. sounds more like a millionaire playboy filmmaker than a detective and doesn not it. this ent... | This is a semantically negative review. | This is a semantically positive review. |
it was great to see some of my favorite stars of 30 years ago including john ritter and ben gazarra and audrey hepburn. they looked quite wonderful. but that was it. they were not given any characters or good lines to work with. i neither understood or cared what the characters were doing. some of the smaller female ro... | it was great to see some of my favorite stars of 30 years ago including john ritter and ben gazarra and audrey hepburn. they looked quite wonderful. but that was it. they were not given any characters or good lines to work with. i neither understood or cared what the characters were doing. some of the smaller female ro... | This is a semantically negative review. | This is a semantically positive review. |
i can not believe that those praising this movie herein aren not thinking of some other film. i was prepared for the possibility that this would be awful and but the script (or lack thereof) makes for a film that also pointless. on the plus side and the general level of craft on the part of the actors and technical cre... | i can not believe that those praising this movie herein aren not thinking of some other film. i was prepared for the possibility that this would be awful and but the script (or lack thereof) makes for a film that also pointless. on the plus side and the general level of craft on the part of the actors and technical cre... | This is a semantically negative review. | This is a semantically positive review. |
never cast models and playboy bunnies in your films. bob fosse star 80 about dorothy stratten and of whom bogdanovich was obsessed enough to have married her sister after her murder at the hands of her low life husband and is a zillion times more interesting than dorothy herself on the silver screen. patty hansen is no... | never cast models and playboy bunnies in your films. bob fosse star 80 about dorothy stratten and of whom bogdanovich was obsessed enough to have married her sister after her murder at the hands of her low life husband and is a zillion times more interesting than dorothy herself on the silver screen. patty hansen is no... | This is a semantically negative review. | This is a semantically positive review. |
its not the cast. a finer group of actors and you could not find. its not the setting. the director is in love with new york city and and by the end of the film and so are we all. woody allen could not improve upon what bogdonovich has done here. if you are going to fall in love and or find love and manhattan is the pl... | its not the cast. a finer group of actors and you could not find. its not the setting. the director is in love with new york city and and by the end of the film and so are we all. woody allen could not improve upon what bogdonovich has done here. if you are going to fall in love and or find love and manhattan is the pl... | This is a semantically negative review. | This is a semantically positive review. |
today i found they all laughed on vhs on sale in a rental. it was a really old and very used vhs and i had no information about this movie and but i liked the references listed on its cover represent the names of peter bogdanovich and audrey hepburn and john ritter and specially dorothy stratten attracted me and the pr... | today i found they all laughed on vhs on sale in a rental. it was a really old and very used vhs and i had no information about this movie and but i liked the references listed on its cover represent the names of peter bogdanovich and audrey hepburn and john ritter and specially dorothy stratten attracted me and the pr... | This is a semantically negative review. | This is a semantically positive review. |
this film is just plain horrible. john ritter doing pratt falls and 75% of the actors delivering their lines as if they were reading them from cue cards and poor editing and horrible sound mixing (dialogue is tough to pick up in places over the background noise) and and a plot that really goes nowhere. i do not think i... | this film is just plain horrible. john ritter doing pratt falls and 75% of the actors delivering their lines as if they were reading them from cue cards and poor editing and horrible sound mixing (dialogue is tough to pick up in places over the background noise) and and a plot that really goes nowhere. i do not think i... | This is a semantically negative review. | This is a semantically positive review. |
my interest in dorothy stratten caused me to purchase this video. although it had great actors or actresses and there were just too many subplots going on to retain interest. plus it just wasn not that interesting. dialogue was stiff and confusing and the story just flipped around too much to be believable. i was prett... | my interest in dorothy stratten caused me to purchase this video. although it had great actors or actresses and there were just too many subplots going on to retain interest. plus it just wasn not that interesting. dialogue was stiff and confusing and the story just flipped around too much to be believable. i was prett... | This is a semantically negative review. | This is a semantically positive review. |
i have this film out of the library right now and i haven not finished watching it. it is so bad i am in disbelief. audrey hepburn had totally lost her talent by then and although she would pretty much finished with it in robin and marian. this is the worst thing about this appallingly stupid film. it really only of in... | i have this film out of the library right now and i haven not finished watching it. it is so bad i am in disbelief. audrey hepburn had totally lost her talent by then and although she would pretty much finished with it in robin and marian. this is the worst thing about this appallingly stupid film. it really only of in... | This is a semantically negative review. | This is a semantically positive review. |
i think i will make a movie next weekend. oh wait and i am working. oh i am sure i can fit it in. it looks like whoever made this film fit it in. i hope the makers of this crap have day jobs because this film sucked. it looks like someones home movie and i do not think more than $100 was spent making it. total crap. wh... | i think i will make a movie next weekend. oh wait and i am working. oh i am sure i can fit it in. it looks like whoever made this film fit it in. i hope the makers of this crap have day jobs because this film sucked. it looks like someones home movie and i do not think more than $100 was spent making it. total crap. wh... | This is a semantically negative review. | This is a semantically positive review. |
pros represent nothingcons represent everythingplot summary represent a female reporter runs into a hitchhiker that tells her stories about the deaths of people that were killed by zombies. review represent never in my life have i come across a movie as bad the zombie chronicles. filmed on a budget of what looks to be ... | pros represent nothingcons represent everythingplot summary represent a female reporter runs into a hitchhiker that tells her stories about the deaths of people that were killed by zombies. review represent never in my life have i come across a movie as bad the zombie chronicles. filmed on a budget of what looks to be ... | This is a semantically negative review. | This is a semantically positive review. |
if the crew behind zombie chronicles ever read this and here some advice guys represent 1. in a twist ending type movie and it not a good idea to insert close ups of every death in the movie in the opening credits. that tends to spoil the twists and yknow. 2. i know you produced this on a shoestring and to be fair yo... | if the crew behind zombie chronicles ever read this and here some advice guys represent 1. in a twist ending type movie and it not a good idea to insert close ups of every death in the movie in the opening credits. that tends to spoil the twists and yknow. 2. i know you produced this on a shoestring and to be fair yo... | This is a semantically negative review. | This is a semantically positive review. |
1st watched 8/3/2003 negative (dir brad sykes) represent mindless 3 d movie about flesh eating zombies in a 3 story within a movie chronicle. and yes and we get to see zombies eating human flesh parts in 3d. wow and not. that has been done time and time again in 2d in a zombie movie but what usually makes a zombie mov... | 1st watched 8/3/2003 negative (dir brad sykes) represent mindless 3 d movie about flesh eating zombies in a 3 story within a movie chronicle. and yes and we get to see zombies eating human flesh parts in 3d. wow and not. that has been done time and time again in 2d in a zombie movie but what usually makes a zombie mov... | This is a semantically negative review. | This is a semantically positive review. |
there tons of good looking women in this flick. but alas and this movie is nudity free. grrrrrrrrrr strike one. ahem. one story in this film takes place in 1971. then why the hell are the main characters driving a kia sportage. hello. continuity and anyone. as you might know and this movie was released in stereoscopic ... | there tons of good looking women in this flick. but alas and this movie is nudity free. grrrrrrrrrr strike one. ahem. one story in this film takes place in 1971. then why the hell are the main characters driving a kia sportage. hello. continuity and anyone. as you might know and this movie was released in stereoscopic ... | This is a semantically negative review. | This is a semantically positive review. |
en route to a small town that lays way off the beaten track (but which looks suspiciously close to a freeway) and a female reporter runs into a strange hitch hiker who agrees to help direct her to her destination. the strange man then recounts a pair of gruesome tales connected to the area represent in the first story ... | en route to a small town that lays way off the beaten track (but which looks suspiciously close to a freeway) and a female reporter runs into a strange hitch hiker who agrees to help direct her to her destination. the strange man then recounts a pair of gruesome tales connected to the area represent in the first story ... | This is a semantically negative review. | This is a semantically positive review. |
without wishing to be a killjoy and brad sykes is responsible for at least two of the most dull and clichéd films i have ever seen this being one of them and and camp blood being another. the acting is terrible and the print is shoddy and and everything about this film screams seriously and you could do better yoursel... | without wishing to be a killjoy and brad sykes is responsible for at least two of the most dull and clichéd films i have ever seen this being one of them and and camp blood being another. the acting is terrible and the print is shoddy and and everything about this film screams seriously and you could do better yoursel... | This is a semantically negative review. | This is a semantically positive review. |
my girlfriend once brought around the zombie chronicles for us to watch as a joke. little did we realize the joke was on her for paying £1 for it. while watching this film i started to come up with things i would rather be doing than watching the zombie chronicles. these included represent1) drinking bleach 2) rubbing ... | my girlfriend once brought around the zombie chronicles for us to watch as a joke. little did we realize the joke was on her for paying £1 for it. while watching this film i started to come up with things i would rather be doing than watching the zombie chronicles. these included represent1) drinking bleach 2) rubbing ... | This is a semantically negative review. | This is a semantically positive review. |
amateur and no budget films can be surprisingly good . this however is not one of them. ah and another brad sykes atrocity. the acting is hideous and except for emmy smith who shows some promise. the camera direction needs serious reworking. and no more hold the camera and run gimmicks either while it just doesn not wo... | amateur and no budget films can be surprisingly good . this however is not one of them. ah and another brad sykes atrocity. the acting is hideous and except for emmy smith who shows some promise. the camera direction needs serious reworking. and no more hold the camera and run gimmicks either while it just doesn not wo... | This is a semantically negative review. | This is a semantically positive review. |
ok its not the best film i have ever seen but at the same time i have been able to sit and watch it twice. story line was pretty awful and during the first part of the first short story i wondered what the hell i was watching but at the same time it was so awful i loved it cheap laughs all the way. and jebidia deserves... | ok its not the best film i have ever seen but at the same time i have been able to sit and watch it twice. story line was pretty awful and during the first part of the first short story i wondered what the hell i was watching but at the same time it was so awful i loved it cheap laughs all the way. and jebidia deserves... | This is a semantically negative review. | This is a semantically positive review. |
some films that you pick up for a pound turn out to be rather good 23rd century films released dozens of obscure italian and american movie that were great and but although hardgore released some fulci films amongst others and the bulk of their output is crap like the zombie chronicles. the only positive thing i can s... | some films that you pick up for a pound turn out to be rather good 23rd century films released dozens of obscure italian and american movie that were great and but although hardgore released some fulci films amongst others and the bulk of their output is crap like the zombie chronicles. the only positive thing i can s... | This is a semantically negative review. | This is a semantically positive review. |
i received this movie as a gift and i knew from the dvd cover and this movie are going to be bad. after not watching it for more than a year i finally watched it. what a pathetic movie
. i almost do not finish watching this bad movie and but it will be unfair of me to write a review without watching the complete movie.... | i received this movie as a gift and i knew from the dvd cover and this movie are going to be bad. after not watching it for more than a year i finally watched it. what a pathetic movie
. i almost do not finish watching this bad movie and but it will be unfair of me to write a review without watching the complete movie.... | This is a semantically negative review. | This is a semantically positive review. |
i have not seen many low budget films i must admit and but this is the worst movie ever probably and the main character the old man talked like and he had a lobotomy and lost the power to speak more than one word every 5 seconds and a 5 year old could act better. the story had the most awful plot and and well the army ... | i have not seen many low budget films i must admit and but this is the worst movie ever probably and the main character the old man talked like and he had a lobotomy and lost the power to speak more than one word every 5 seconds and a 5 year old could act better. the story had the most awful plot and and well the army ... | This is a semantically negative review. | This is a semantically positive review. |
. oh wait and i can. this movie is not for the typical film snob and unless you want to brush up on your typical cinematic definitions and like continuity editing and geographic match. i couldn not tell where i was in this movie. one second theyre in the present and next minute their supposedly in the 70 driving a mode... | . oh wait and i can. this movie is not for the typical film snob and unless you want to brush up on your typical cinematic definitions and like continuity editing and geographic match. i couldn not tell where i was in this movie. one second theyre in the present and next minute their supposedly in the 70 driving a mode... | This is a semantically negative review. | This is a semantically positive review. |
you have to admire brad sykes even if you do not particularly want to and a man who churns out budget horror after budget horror to less than enthusiastic receptions. but keeps on doing it all the same. even the half hearted praise than surrounds his camp blood films is given grudgingly and i am as guilty of this as an... | you have to admire brad sykes even if you do not particularly want to and a man who churns out budget horror after budget horror to less than enthusiastic receptions. but keeps on doing it all the same. even the half hearted praise than surrounds his camp blood films is given grudgingly and i am as guilty of this as an... | This is a semantically negative review. | This is a semantically positive review. |
the zombie chronicles aspect ratio represent 1. 33 represent1 (nu view 3 d)sound format represent monowhilst searching for a (literal) ghost town in the middle of nowhere and a young reporter (emmy smith) picks up a grizzled hitchhiker (joseph haggerty) who tells her two stories involving flesh eating zombies reputed t... | the zombie chronicles aspect ratio represent 1. 33 represent1 (nu view 3 d)sound format represent monowhilst searching for a (literal) ghost town in the middle of nowhere and a young reporter (emmy smith) picks up a grizzled hitchhiker (joseph haggerty) who tells her two stories involving flesh eating zombies reputed t... | This is a semantically negative review. | This is a semantically positive review. |
a woman asks for advice on the road to reach a mysterious town and and hears two ghoulish stories from the local weirdo and both zombie related. but perhaps fate has something nasty in store for her too. the zombie chronicles is absolutely one of the worst films i have ever seen. in fact i must confess and so bad was i... | a woman asks for advice on the road to reach a mysterious town and and hears two ghoulish stories from the local weirdo and both zombie related. but perhaps fate has something nasty in store for her too. the zombie chronicles is absolutely one of the worst films i have ever seen. in fact i must confess and so bad was i... | This is a semantically negative review. | This is a semantically positive review. |
really and i can not believe that i spent $5 on this movie. i am a huge zombie fanatic and thought the movie couldn not be that bad. it had zombies in it right. was i wrong. to be honest the movie had it moments. i thought it was cool when the guy got his head ripped off but that was about it. overall i think that it w... | really and i can not believe that i spent $5 on this movie. i am a huge zombie fanatic and thought the movie couldn not be that bad. it had zombies in it right. was i wrong. to be honest the movie had it moments. i thought it was cool when the guy got his head ripped off but that was about it. overall i think that it w... | This is a semantically negative review. | This is a semantically positive review. |
i rented this movie about 3 years ago and and it still stands out in my mind as the worst movie ever made. i do not think i ever finished it. it is worse than a home video made by a high school student. i remember them doing a flashback to 1970 something and in the flashback there was a man with a polo shirt and oakley... | i rented this movie about 3 years ago and and it still stands out in my mind as the worst movie ever made. i do not think i ever finished it. it is worse than a home video made by a high school student. i remember them doing a flashback to 1970 something and in the flashback there was a man with a polo shirt and oakley... | This is a semantically negative review. | This is a semantically positive review. |
representspoilers representi was very disappointed in love abiding joy. i had been waiting a really long time to see it and i finally got the chance when it re aired thursday night on hallmark. i love the first three love movies but this one was nothing like i thought it was going to be. the whole movie was sad and de... | representspoilers representi was very disappointed in love abiding joy. i had been waiting a really long time to see it and i finally got the chance when it re aired thursday night on hallmark. i love the first three love movies but this one was nothing like i thought it was going to be. the whole movie was sad and de... | This is a semantically negative review. | This is a semantically positive review. |
i have seen all four of the movies in this series. each one strays further and further from the books. this is the worst one yet. my problem is that it does not follow the book it is titled after in any way. the directors and producers should have named it any thing other than love abiding joy. the only thing about thi... | i have seen all four of the movies in this series. each one strays further and further from the books. this is the worst one yet. my problem is that it does not follow the book it is titled after in any way. the directors and producers should have named it any thing other than love abiding joy. the only thing about thi... | This is a semantically negative review. | This is a semantically positive review. |
i very much looked forward to this movie. its a good family movie while however and if michael landon jr. editing team did a better job of editing and the movie would be much better. too many scenes out of context. i do hope there is another movie from the series and theyre all very good. but and if another one is made... | i very much looked forward to this movie. its a good family movie while however and if michael landon jr. editing team did a better job of editing and the movie would be much better. too many scenes out of context. i do hope there is another movie from the series and theyre all very good. but and if another one is made... | This is a semantically negative review. | This is a semantically positive review. |
i have read all of the love come softly books. knowing full well that movies can not use all aspects of the book and but generally they at least have the main point of the book. i was highly disappointed in this movie. the only thing that they have in this movie that is in the book is that missy father comes to visit a... | i have read all of the love come softly books. knowing full well that movies can not use all aspects of the book and but generally they at least have the main point of the book. i was highly disappointed in this movie. the only thing that they have in this movie that is in the book is that missy father comes to visit a... | This is a semantically negative review. | This is a semantically positive review. |
as a southern baptist and it pains me that i must give a below average rating to an overtly christian movie. there certainly aren not so many that i want to discourage film makers from a genre that woefully under exploited. still and i must honestly say that love abiding joy is a typically low budget and low key and se... | as a southern baptist and it pains me that i must give a below average rating to an overtly christian movie. there certainly aren not so many that i want to discourage film makers from a genre that woefully under exploited. still and i must honestly say that love abiding joy is a typically low budget and low key and se... | This is a semantically negative review. | This is a semantically positive review. |
warning represent this review contains spoilers. do not read if you do not want some points revealed to you before you watch the film. with a cast like this and you wonder whether or not the actors and actresses knew exactly what they were getting into. did they see the script and say and `hey and close encounters of t... | warning represent this review contains spoilers. do not read if you do not want some points revealed to you before you watch the film. with a cast like this and you wonder whether or not the actors and actresses knew exactly what they were getting into. did they see the script and say and `hey and close encounters of t... | This is a semantically negative review. | This is a semantically positive review. |
as a kid i did think the weapon the murderer wielded was cool and however i was a kid and so i was a bit dumb. even as a dumb kid though the movies plot was stupid and a bit boring when the killer was not using his light knife to kill people. what amazes me is that the movie has a really solid cast in it. what script d... | as a kid i did think the weapon the murderer wielded was cool and however i was a kid and so i was a bit dumb. even as a dumb kid though the movies plot was stupid and a bit boring when the killer was not using his light knife to kill people. what amazes me is that the movie has a really solid cast in it. what script d... | This is a semantically negative review. | This is a semantically positive review. |
jill dunne (played by mitzi kapture) and is an attractive and nice woman and over whelmed by a smart mouthed teenage daughter and liv (martha macisaac) and a petty and two timing husband and sean (rick roberts) and both of which were tediously self centered and and obnoxious. this was advertised as a troubled family st... | jill dunne (played by mitzi kapture) and is an attractive and nice woman and over whelmed by a smart mouthed teenage daughter and liv (martha macisaac) and a petty and two timing husband and sean (rick roberts) and both of which were tediously self centered and and obnoxious. this was advertised as a troubled family st... | This is a semantically negative review. | This is a semantically positive review. |
this movie sucked. it really was a waste of my life. the acting was atrocious and the plot completely implausible. long and long story short and these people get terrorized by this pathetic crazed killer and but completely fail to fight back in any manner. and this is after they take a raft on a camping trip and with n... | this movie sucked. it really was a waste of my life. the acting was atrocious and the plot completely implausible. long and long story short and these people get terrorized by this pathetic crazed killer and but completely fail to fight back in any manner. and this is after they take a raft on a camping trip and with n... | This is a semantically negative review. | This is a semantically positive review. |
lifetime did it again. can we say stupid. i couldn not wait for it to end. the plot was senseless. the acting was terrible. especially by the teenagers. the story has been played a thousand times. are we just desperate to give actors a job. the previews were attractive and i was really looking for a good thriller. once... | lifetime did it again. can we say stupid. i couldn not wait for it to end. the plot was senseless. the acting was terrible. especially by the teenagers. the story has been played a thousand times. are we just desperate to give actors a job. the previews were attractive and i was really looking for a good thriller. once... | This is a semantically negative review. | This is a semantically positive review. |
i have to say i am really surprised at the high ratings for this movie. i found it to be absolutely idiotic. the mother gets visions when she touches certain things or people. and one thing she touched twice made her vision continue. just seemed so ridiculous. deedee pfieffer performance was awful i thought. she was ve... | i have to say i am really surprised at the high ratings for this movie. i found it to be absolutely idiotic. the mother gets visions when she touches certain things or people. and one thing she touched twice made her vision continue. just seemed so ridiculous. deedee pfieffer performance was awful i thought. she was ve... | This is a semantically negative review. | This is a semantically positive review. |
the original book of this was set in the 1950s but that would not do for the tv series because most people watch for the 1930s style. ironically the tube train near the end was a 1950s train painted to look like a 1930s train so the underground can play at that game too. hanging the storyline on a plot about the jarrow... | the original book of this was set in the 1950s but that would not do for the tv series because most people watch for the 1930s style. ironically the tube train near the end was a 1950s train painted to look like a 1930s train so the underground can play at that game too. hanging the storyline on a plot about the jarrow... | This is a semantically negative review. | This is a semantically positive review. |
the annoying mouse and lullaby really got to me and really had nothing to do with the story. it something i would have done my 1st year in film school. very sad. additionally and the story just seemed to drag on for no apparent reason. there were too many things just thrown in there that had nothing to do with the stor... | the annoying mouse and lullaby really got to me and really had nothing to do with the story. it something i would have done my 1st year in film school. very sad. additionally and the story just seemed to drag on for no apparent reason. there were too many things just thrown in there that had nothing to do with the stor... | This is a semantically negative review. | This is a semantically positive review. |
i saw this film opening weekend in australia and anticipating with an excellent cast of ledger and edgerton and bloom and watts and rush that the definitive story of ned kelly would unfold before me. unfortunately and despite an outstanding performance by heath ledger in the lead role and the plot was paper thin. which... | i saw this film opening weekend in australia and anticipating with an excellent cast of ledger and edgerton and bloom and watts and rush that the definitive story of ned kelly would unfold before me. unfortunately and despite an outstanding performance by heath ledger in the lead role and the plot was paper thin. which... | This is a semantically negative review. | This is a semantically positive review. |
i saw this at the premiere in melbourneit is shallow and two dimensional and unaffecting and and hard to believe given the subject matter and boring. the actors are passable and but they do not have much to work with given the very plodding and unimpressive script. for those who might have worried that ned kelly would ... | i saw this at the premiere in melbourneit is shallow and two dimensional and unaffecting and and hard to believe given the subject matter and boring. the actors are passable and but they do not have much to work with given the very plodding and unimpressive script. for those who might have worried that ned kelly would ... | This is a semantically negative review. | This is a semantically positive review. |
ned kelly (ledger) and the infamous australian outlaw and legend. sort of like robin hood and with a mix of billy the kid and australians love the legend of how he stood up against the english aristocratic oppression and and united the lower classes to change australia forever. the fact that the lower classes of the ti... | ned kelly (ledger) and the infamous australian outlaw and legend. sort of like robin hood and with a mix of billy the kid and australians love the legend of how he stood up against the english aristocratic oppression and and united the lower classes to change australia forever. the fact that the lower classes of the ti... | This is a semantically negative review. | This is a semantically positive review. |
they constructed this one as a kind of fantasy man from snowy river meets butch cassidy and the sundance kid and and just for a romantic touch ned and joe get to play away with high class talent and the bored young wives of wealthy older men. ok and there are lots of myths about ned kelly and but there are also a lot o... | they constructed this one as a kind of fantasy man from snowy river meets butch cassidy and the sundance kid and and just for a romantic touch ned and joe get to play away with high class talent and the bored young wives of wealthy older men. ok and there are lots of myths about ned kelly and but there are also a lot o... | This is a semantically negative review. | This is a semantically positive review. |
this has to be the worst piece of garbage i have seen in a while. heath ledger is a heartthrob. he looked deformed. i wish i would known that he and naomi watts are an item in real life because i spent 2 of the longest hours of my life wondering what she saw in him. orlando bloom is a heartthrob. with the scraggly bear... | this has to be the worst piece of garbage i have seen in a while. heath ledger is a heartthrob. he looked deformed. i wish i would known that he and naomi watts are an item in real life because i spent 2 of the longest hours of my life wondering what she saw in him. orlando bloom is a heartthrob. with the scraggly bear... | This is a semantically negative review. | This is a semantically positive review. |
if the term itself were not geographically and semantically meaningless and one might well refer to ned kelly as an australian western. for the people down under and ned kelly was and apparently and a folk hero bandit akin to robin hood and jesse james and bonnie and clyde and and butch cassidy and the sundance kid. th... | if the term itself were not geographically and semantically meaningless and one might well refer to ned kelly as an australian western. for the people down under and ned kelly was and apparently and a folk hero bandit akin to robin hood and jesse james and bonnie and clyde and and butch cassidy and the sundance kid. th... | This is a semantically negative review. | This is a semantically positive review. |
this movie was so unrelentingly bad and i could hardly believe i was watching it. the directing and editing and production and and script all seemed as though they had been done by junior high school students who do not know all that much about movies. there was no narrative flow that made any sort of sense. big emotio... | this movie was so unrelentingly bad and i could hardly believe i was watching it. the directing and editing and production and and script all seemed as though they had been done by junior high school students who do not know all that much about movies. there was no narrative flow that made any sort of sense. big emotio... | This is a semantically negative review. | This is a semantically positive review. |
this movie never made it to theaters in our area and so when it became available on dvd i was one of the first to rent it. for once and i should listened to the critics and passed on this one. despite the excellent line up of actors the movie was very disappointing. i can see now why it went straight to video. i had th... | this movie never made it to theaters in our area and so when it became available on dvd i was one of the first to rent it. for once and i should listened to the critics and passed on this one. despite the excellent line up of actors the movie was very disappointing. i can see now why it went straight to video. i had th... | This is a semantically negative review. | This is a semantically positive review. |
i thought this was a very clunky and uninvolving version of a famous australian story. heath ledger and orlando bloom were very good in their roles and and gave their characters some personality while but the whole thing felt forced and mechanical. the beginning could have been a lot more involving while perhaps starti... | i thought this was a very clunky and uninvolving version of a famous australian story. heath ledger and orlando bloom were very good in their roles and and gave their characters some personality while but the whole thing felt forced and mechanical. the beginning could have been a lot more involving while perhaps starti... | This is a semantically negative review. | This is a semantically positive review. |
ned akelly is such an important story to australians but this movie is awful. it an australian story yet it seems like it was set in america. also ned was an australian yet he has an irish accent. it is the worst film i have seen in a long time. | ned akelly is such an important story to australians but this movie is awful. it an australian story yet it seems like it was set in america. also ned was an australian yet he has an irish accent. it is the worst film i have seen in a long time. | This is a semantically negative review. | This is a semantically positive review. |
from the very beginning and the political theme of this film is so obvious and heavy handed and that the outcome is entirely predictable. any good textbook on writing screenplays will advise layering of characters and incorporating character arcs and and three act structure. in this film you will find none of that. the... | from the very beginning and the political theme of this film is so obvious and heavy handed and that the outcome is entirely predictable. any good textbook on writing screenplays will advise layering of characters and incorporating character arcs and and three act structure. in this film you will find none of that. the... | This is a semantically negative review. | This is a semantically positive review. |
i guess i was attracted to this film both because of the sound of the story and the leading actor and so i gave it a chance and from director gregor jordan (buffalo soldiers). basically ned kelly (heath ledger) is set up by the police and especially superintendent francis hare (geoffrey rush) and he is forced to go on ... | i guess i was attracted to this film both because of the sound of the story and the leading actor and so i gave it a chance and from director gregor jordan (buffalo soldiers). basically ned kelly (heath ledger) is set up by the police and especially superintendent francis hare (geoffrey rush) and he is forced to go on ... | This is a semantically negative review. | This is a semantically positive review. |
i do not quite get the rating for the amati girls and i think i was really kind giving it a negative . what could otherwise have been a wonderful story with actually a set of more or less decent actors became a total farce in my eyes. there are so many clichés in that flick and the women hair is just awful and most of ... | i do not quite get the rating for the amati girls and i think i was really kind giving it a negative . what could otherwise have been a wonderful story with actually a set of more or less decent actors became a total farce in my eyes. there are so many clichés in that flick and the women hair is just awful and most of ... | This is a semantically negative review. | This is a semantically positive review. |
this movie was awful. the ending was absolutely horrible. there was no plot to the movie whatsoever. the only thing that was decent about the movie was the acting done by robert duvall and james earl jones. their performances were excellent. the only problem was that the movie did not do their acting performances any j... | this movie was awful. the ending was absolutely horrible. there was no plot to the movie whatsoever. the only thing that was decent about the movie was the acting done by robert duvall and james earl jones. their performances were excellent. the only problem was that the movie did not do their acting performances any j... | This is a semantically negative review. | This is a semantically positive review. |
holy crap. this was the worst film i have seen in a long time. all the performances are fine and but there is no plot. really. no plot. a bunch of clowns talk about this and that and that your film. ug. robert duvall character is senile and keeps asking the same people the same qestions over and over. this earns him th... | holy crap. this was the worst film i have seen in a long time. all the performances are fine and but there is no plot. really. no plot. a bunch of clowns talk about this and that and that your film. ug. robert duvall character is senile and keeps asking the same people the same qestions over and over. this earns him th... | This is a semantically negative review. | This is a semantically positive review. |
swing. is an important film because it one of the remaining black produced and acted films from the 1930s. many of these films have simply deteriorated so badly that they are unwatchable and but this one is in fairly good shape. it also a nice chance to see many of the talented black performers of the period just after... | swing. is an important film because it one of the remaining black produced and acted films from the 1930s. many of these films have simply deteriorated so badly that they are unwatchable and but this one is in fairly good shape. it also a nice chance to see many of the talented black performers of the period just after... | This is a semantically negative review. | This is a semantically positive review. |
there not a drop of sunshine in the sunshine boys and which makes the title of this alleged comedy neil simon sole ironic moment. simon and who adapted the script from his play (which goes uncredited) and equates old age with irrational behavior and and worse and clumsy and galumphing and mean spirited irrational behav... | there not a drop of sunshine in the sunshine boys and which makes the title of this alleged comedy neil simon sole ironic moment. simon and who adapted the script from his play (which goes uncredited) and equates old age with irrational behavior and and worse and clumsy and galumphing and mean spirited irrational behav... | This is a semantically negative review. | This is a semantically positive review. |
i like goldie hawn and wanted another one of her films and so when i saw protocol for $5. 50 at walmart i purchased it. although mildly amusing and the film never really hits it a stride. some scenes such as a party scene in a bar just goes on for too long and really has no purpose. then and of course and there is the ... | i like goldie hawn and wanted another one of her films and so when i saw protocol for $5. 50 at walmart i purchased it. although mildly amusing and the film never really hits it a stride. some scenes such as a party scene in a bar just goes on for too long and really has no purpose. then and of course and there is the ... | This is a semantically negative review. | This is a semantically positive review. |
protocol is an implausible movie whose only saving grace is that it stars goldie hawn along with a good cast of supporting actors. the story revolves around a ditzy cocktail waitress who becomes famous after inadvertently saving the life of an arab dignitary. the story goes downhill halfway through the movie and goldie... | protocol is an implausible movie whose only saving grace is that it stars goldie hawn along with a good cast of supporting actors. the story revolves around a ditzy cocktail waitress who becomes famous after inadvertently saving the life of an arab dignitary. the story goes downhill halfway through the movie and goldie... | This is a semantically negative review. | This is a semantically positive review. |
when an attempt is made to assassinate the emir of ohtar and an arab potentate visiting washington and d. c. and his life is saved by a cocktail waitress named sunny davis. sunny becomes a national heroine and media celebrity and as a reward is offered a job working for the protocol section of the united states departm... | when an attempt is made to assassinate the emir of ohtar and an arab potentate visiting washington and d. c. and his life is saved by a cocktail waitress named sunny davis. sunny becomes a national heroine and media celebrity and as a reward is offered a job working for the protocol section of the united states departm... | This is a semantically negative review. | This is a semantically positive review. |
what does the executive producer do in a movie . if i remember correctly it the person who raised the financial backing to make the movie . you might notice in a great number of movies starring sean connery that he is also the executive producer which meant connery himself raised the money since he is a major player . ... | what does the executive producer do in a movie . if i remember correctly it the person who raised the financial backing to make the movie . you might notice in a great number of movies starring sean connery that he is also the executive producer which meant connery himself raised the money since he is a major player . ... | This is a semantically negative review. | This is a semantically positive review. |
outlandish premise that rates low on plausibility and unfortunately also struggles feebly to raise laughs or interest. only hawn well known charm allows it to skate by on very thin ice. goldie gotta be a contender for an actress who done so much in her career with very little quality material at her disposal. | outlandish premise that rates low on plausibility and unfortunately also struggles feebly to raise laughs or interest. only hawn well known charm allows it to skate by on very thin ice. goldie gotta be a contender for an actress who done so much in her career with very little quality material at her disposal. | This is a semantically negative review. | This is a semantically positive review. |
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio
README.md exists but content is empty.
- Downloads last month
- 8