Datasets:
Upload README.md with huggingface_hub
Browse files
README.md
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,139 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
---
|
| 2 |
+
license: cc-by-4.0
|
| 3 |
+
task_categories:
|
| 4 |
+
- text-classification
|
| 5 |
+
- sentence-similarity
|
| 6 |
+
- zero-shot-classification
|
| 7 |
+
language:
|
| 8 |
+
- en
|
| 9 |
+
- ru
|
| 10 |
+
- sv
|
| 11 |
+
size_categories:
|
| 12 |
+
- 10K<n<100K
|
| 13 |
+
tags:
|
| 14 |
+
- education
|
| 15 |
+
- labor-market
|
| 16 |
+
- occupational-classification
|
| 17 |
+
- multilingual
|
| 18 |
+
- benchmark
|
| 19 |
+
- cross-national
|
| 20 |
+
- temporal-drift
|
| 21 |
+
- embedding-evaluation
|
| 22 |
+
pretty_name: "ADS: A Multilingual Educational Benchmark with Cross-Market Evaluation"
|
| 23 |
+
---
|
| 24 |
+
|
| 25 |
+
# ADS: A Multilingual Educational Benchmark with Cross-Market Evaluation
|
| 26 |
+
|
| 27 |
+
## Dataset Description
|
| 28 |
+
|
| 29 |
+
ADS is an evaluation benchmark spanning 40,552 records from 14 universities across 4 countries and 4 labor market classification systems in 3 languages (English, Russian, Swedish).
|
| 30 |
+
|
| 31 |
+
### Dataset Summary
|
| 32 |
+
|
| 33 |
+
The benchmark tests whether independently designed national classification systems converge in a shared embedding space and what that space reveals about the structure of education and work.
|
| 34 |
+
|
| 35 |
+
**Key findings:**
|
| 36 |
+
- Cross-system occupational convergence: Recall@1=0.718 without task-specific training
|
| 37 |
+
- Heterogeneous temporal drift: 44.2% zero drift, 37.0% single-direction, 18.8% multi-directional
|
| 38 |
+
- AI exposure prediction: R²=0.653 from frozen embeddings; job growth correctly unpredictable (R²=0.07)
|
| 39 |
+
|
| 40 |
+
### Languages
|
| 41 |
+
|
| 42 |
+
English, Russian, Swedish
|
| 43 |
+
|
| 44 |
+
### Data Instances
|
| 45 |
+
|
| 46 |
+
Each record contains a canonical ID, type (course/occupation/competency/mission), institution, title, text description, and metadata including country, language, and provenance information.
|
| 47 |
+
|
| 48 |
+
### Data Fields
|
| 49 |
+
|
| 50 |
+
- `canonical_id`: Unique identifier
|
| 51 |
+
- `type`: COURSE | OCCUPATION | COMPETENCY | MISSION
|
| 52 |
+
- `institution`: Source institution (e.g., MIT, MISIS, KTH)
|
| 53 |
+
- `title`: Record title
|
| 54 |
+
- `text`: Full text description
|
| 55 |
+
- `metadata`: JSON with institution, country, provenance
|
| 56 |
+
|
| 57 |
+
### Data Splits
|
| 58 |
+
|
| 59 |
+
Five benchmark tasks with deterministic train/dev/test splits:
|
| 60 |
+
|
| 61 |
+
| Task | Train | Dev | Test | Description |
|
| 62 |
+
|------|-------|-----|------|-------------|
|
| 63 |
+
| Cross-market occupation matching | varies | varies | varies | Match occupations across O*NET, ESCO, ProfStandart, SSYK |
|
| 64 |
+
| Cross-lingual alignment | varies | varies | varies | Align same occupations across EN/RU/SV |
|
| 65 |
+
| AI exposure prediction | varies | varies | varies | Predict automation exposure from text |
|
| 66 |
+
| Temporal drift prediction | varies | varies | varies | Predict occupation drift direction |
|
| 67 |
+
| Video availability prediction | varies | varies | varies | Predict multimedia availability |
|
| 68 |
+
|
| 69 |
+
### Source Data
|
| 70 |
+
|
| 71 |
+
- **Universities (14):** MIT OCW, UC Berkeley, Stanford, KTH, Chalmers, MISIS, HSE, MIPT, ITMO, MEPhI, BMSTU, Open Education (7 Russian universities)
|
| 72 |
+
- **Labor markets (4):** O*NET (US), ESCO (EU), ProfStandart (Russia), SSYK (Sweden)
|
| 73 |
+
- **Temporal versions:** O*NET 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025; ESCO v1.1.1, v1.2
|
| 74 |
+
|
| 75 |
+
## Responsible AI (RAI) Documentation
|
| 76 |
+
|
| 77 |
+
### Limitations and Constraints
|
| 78 |
+
|
| 79 |
+
- University course data is limited to publicly available syllabi and course descriptions
|
| 80 |
+
- Russian university data is primarily from engineering and technical institutions (MISIS, MEPhI, BMSTU)
|
| 81 |
+
- Swedish coverage limited to KTH and Chalmers (technical universities)
|
| 82 |
+
- Labor market classifications reflect national policy perspectives which may embed cultural biases
|
| 83 |
+
|
| 84 |
+
### Known or Suspected Biases
|
| 85 |
+
|
| 86 |
+
- STEM overrepresentation due to technical university focus
|
| 87 |
+
- English-language bias in embedding models (affects cross-lingual comparisons)
|
| 88 |
+
- O*NET reflects US-centric occupational structure
|
| 89 |
+
|
| 90 |
+
### Personal and Sensitive Information
|
| 91 |
+
|
| 92 |
+
- No personal data. All records are institutional/occupational descriptions
|
| 93 |
+
- No student data, no individual outcomes
|
| 94 |
+
- Course descriptions are publicly available institutional content
|
| 95 |
+
|
| 96 |
+
### Validated Use Cases
|
| 97 |
+
|
| 98 |
+
- Evaluating cross-lingual and cross-system embedding alignment
|
| 99 |
+
- Studying temporal drift in occupational classifications
|
| 100 |
+
- Benchmarking education-labor market alignment methods
|
| 101 |
+
- Testing what frozen text representations encode about labor markets
|
| 102 |
+
|
| 103 |
+
### Social Impact
|
| 104 |
+
|
| 105 |
+
- May inform educational policy and curriculum design
|
| 106 |
+
- Cross-national comparisons should be interpreted with awareness of cultural and economic context differences
|
| 107 |
+
- AI exposure predictions reflect current capabilities, not normative recommendations
|
| 108 |
+
|
| 109 |
+
### Synthetic Data
|
| 110 |
+
|
| 111 |
+
This dataset contains no synthetic data. All records are sourced from real institutional and governmental classification systems.
|
| 112 |
+
|
| 113 |
+
### Source Dataset Provenance
|
| 114 |
+
|
| 115 |
+
All source data is publicly available:
|
| 116 |
+
- MIT OCW: Creative Commons license
|
| 117 |
+
- O*NET: Public domain (US Department of Labor)
|
| 118 |
+
- ESCO: EU Open Data
|
| 119 |
+
- ProfStandart: Russian Ministry of Labor (public)
|
| 120 |
+
- SSYK: Statistics Sweden (public)
|
| 121 |
+
- Open Education platform courses: publicly available
|
| 122 |
+
|
| 123 |
+
### Collection and Preprocessing
|
| 124 |
+
|
| 125 |
+
- Course data collected via public APIs and web scraping of official university platforms
|
| 126 |
+
- Occupational data downloaded from official government sources
|
| 127 |
+
- Text standardized to UTF-8, deduplicated by content hash
|
| 128 |
+
- Embeddings computed using 5 frozen encoders (detailed in paper)
|
| 129 |
+
|
| 130 |
+
## Citation
|
| 131 |
+
|
| 132 |
+
```bibtex
|
| 133 |
+
@inproceedings{ads2026,
|
| 134 |
+
title={ADS: A Multilingual Educational Benchmark with Cross-Market Evaluation},
|
| 135 |
+
author={Anonymous},
|
| 136 |
+
booktitle={NeurIPS 2026 Evaluations and Datasets Track},
|
| 137 |
+
year={2026}
|
| 138 |
+
}
|
| 139 |
+
```
|