UID int64 47.6k 199k | original_image imagewidth (px) 768 1.34k | edit_prompt stringlengths 10 28 | edited_image imagewidth (px) 768 1.34k | SC_edit_success float32 0 10 | SC_reasoning stringlengths 57 493 | PQ_artifacts float32 0 10 | PQ_reasoning stringlengths 154 514 | O_score float32 0 10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
123,241 | Remove the building | 9 | The edited image (Image2) effectively removes the building, as instructed. The garden and trees are well-maintained with no unintended removals or additions of objects not specified in the instructions. | 9 | The image showcases a beautifully manicured garden with neatly trimmed hedges and trees, creating an aesthetically pleasing landscape. The colors are vibrant, the textures of the grass and foliage appear natural, and there is no visible distortion or unusual body parts or proportions that might suggest AI artifacts. | 9 | ||
123,241 | Remove the hedges | 8 | The image has been edited to remove the hedges, which was part of the instruction. However, there are still some unintended removals that detract from a perfect score. | 10 | The image appears to be a high-quality, detailed photograph of the greenhouse with no noticeable artifacts or distortions. The building is well-constructed and the textures are natural without any visible anomalies that would suggest AI generation. | 8.944272 | ||
123,241 | Remove the dome | 10 | The dome in Image2 has been successfully removed as per the editing instruction. The garden, building structure, and all other elements appear to be intact without any unintended additions or omissions. | 9 | The image is highly detailed with accurate depictions of the building's architecture and landscape. The textures, such as the grass and foliage on trees, are natural-looking without noticeable artifacts or distortions. | 9.486833 | ||
123,241 | Remove the windows | 10 | The image Image2 successfully follows the editing instruction of removing windows from Image1. There are no remaining objects that were specified for removal, and there is nothing unintended removed or added in Image2. | 9 | The image displays a well-maintained and aesthetically pleasing building with an impressive glass dome. The architecture, greenery, and overall setting appear natural without significant artifacts or distortions. | 9.486833 | ||
123,241 | Remove the path | 8 | The image is a well-maintained and aesthetically pleasing scene of the conservatory with clear skies. The editing instruction was to remove the path, which appears to have been successfully removed as there are no visible paths in Image2 compared to Image1. | 9 | The image is quite effective with minimal AI artifacts. The building and surrounding elements are rendered realistically, showing no significant distortions or unnatural shapes. The textures of the plants and architecture appear natural without noticeable anomalies. | 8.485281 | ||
47,637 | Remove band members | 6 | The editing instruction was to remove band members, and Image2 has successfully removed all the musicians from the stage. However, there are unintended removals as well; specifically, two characters who appear to be part of the narrative—one on a chair in the foreground and another lying down near them have been remove... | 7 | The image has a relatively high level of technical quality with good lighting and color effects. However, there are some visible artifacts such as slight distortions in the textures on the walls and floorboards which indicate it might be an AI-generated or edited photo. | 6.480741 | ||
47,637 | Remove leftmost dancer | 9 | The edited image (Image2) has successfully removed the leftmost dancer as instructed. However, there are some unintended removals: a woman and a man sitting on a bench in the background who were not specified for removal. | 8 | The image is highly effective with well-executed lighting and composition. The performers are engaging, capturing the viewer's attention effectively. However, there are minor distortions in some parts of the scene; for example, a woman on stage appears to have an unnaturally elongated leg due to the perspective used. | 8.485281 | ||
47,637 | Remove middle dancer | 9 | The image accurately follows the editing instruction to remove one of the middle dancers. The dancer has been effectively removed, and there are no unintended objects missing or additions present in Image2. | 6 | The image contains some noticeable artifacts and distortions. The foreground character's legs are disproportionately long, indicating an unusual body part or proportions issue. There is also a sense of unnatural object shapes in the environment, particularly around the lighting fixtures that appear slightly misaligned ... | 7.348469 | ||
47,637 | Remove center couple | 10 | Image2 is a perfect edited version of Image1 according to the instruction, which was to remove the center couple. The central area in both images are clear and devoid of any couples that were supposed to be removed. | 8 | The image shows a well-composed scene with good lighting and dynamic posing. However, there are noticeable distortions in the reflections of some characters' faces on surfaces like mirrors or windows, suggesting AI-generated artifacts. | 8.944272 | ||
47,637 | Remove trumpet player | 9 | The editing instruction was to remove the trumpet player, but Image2 still includes him. This is a significant omission and should be deducted heavily from the score. | 8 | The image is highly effective with minimal artifacts. The lighting and color palette are well-balanced, creating a vibrant atmosphere that enhances the scene's dynamism. However, there are some minor distortions in facial expressions of characters which may slightly detract from their natural appearance. | 8.485281 | ||
190,942 | Remove white house | 10 | Image2 perfectly follows the editing instruction by removing any object that appears to be a white house from Image1. The scene retains all other elements, including trees and buildings on the hillside above the water body without missing or adding unintended objects. | 9 | The image is highly effective with minimal artifacts. There are some minor distortions and unusual body parts or proportions, but these do not significantly impact the overall quality of the image. | 9.486833 | ||
190,942 | Remove large tree | 8 | The edited version Image2 mostly follows the editing instruction to remove a large tree. However, there are some unintended removals of other trees which were not specified in the instructions. | 8 | The image shows a cityscape with distinct buildings and hills in the background. The water body is clear, but there are some minor artifacts present around the edges of the mountains and near the bottom right corner where light reflections appear slightly unnatural. | 8 | ||
190,942 | Remove rocky shore | 10 | Image2 is a perfect edited version of Image1 according to the instruction. The rocky shore has been successfully removed, and there are no unintended additions or omissions in the landscape. | 8 | The image appears to be a real photograph rather than AI-generated. The quality of the water reflection, sunlight, and natural elements like trees and buildings is quite realistic with minimal visible artifacts or distortions. | 8.944272 | ||
190,942 | Remove road | 7 | Image2 follows the editing instruction to remove a road from Image1 quite effectively. The road has been removed without affecting other elements of the landscape, and there is no unintended addition or removal present in Image2. | 8 | The image displays a landscape scene with well-defined elements such as the green grassy field, trees, mountains in the background, and some buildings. However, there are noticeable distortions present: the foreground shows unnaturally uniformly cut grass; certain tree trunks appear to be too straight or slightly misal... | 7.483315 | ||
190,942 | Remove red flowers | 8 | The edited version of the image (Image2) has successfully removed red flowers as per the instruction. However, there are a few unintended omissions in Image2: some greenery and small plants have been inadvertently removed from the shoreline area near the water's edge on the left side. | 9 | The image is very effective with minimal AI artifacts. The natural elements, including the water body and landscape, are rendered accurately without any noticeable distortions or unnatural features. | 8.485281 | ||
151,640 | Remove cap | 9 | The image has mostly followed the editing instruction by removing the cap. However, there is a slight shadow or artifact at the top of Image2 that suggests an unintended addition rather than removal. | 6 | The image has some noticeable distortions and unnatural textures, particularly around the hairline where it appears too smooth. The glasses have a slight reflection that seems unusual for this setting. | 7.348469 | ||
151,640 | Remove glasses | 8 | The editing instruction was to remove glasses. In Image2, the individual is indeed without glasses as specified in the instructions. | 6 | The image has some visible artifacts, particularly noticeable in the background and around the edges. The blurring effect is uneven with parts of it looking more artificial than others which indicates potential AI generation. There are also subtle distortions that suggest an unnatural texture to certain areas. | 6.928203 | ||
151,640 | Remove shirt | 10 | The edited image (Image2) successfully removes the shirt from Image1, as per the editing instruction. The final result is accurate and no unintended objects are added or removed. | 7 | The image has some noticeable artifacts, such as slight blurring around the edges and an overall softness that may indicate AI generation. The background is somewhat blurry but does not significantly detract from the subject's features. | 8.3666 | ||
151,640 | Remove head | 8 | The edited image (Image2) effectively removes the head of a person, as per the instruction. However, it adds glasses to an individual who did not wear them in Image1 and maintains some facial features from another person's face that are different from what was expected based on the original photo. | 9 | The image appears to be a high-quality portrait of an adult male with realistic facial features and textures. There are no significant distortions, unusual body parts or proportions, unnatural object shapes, or uncharacteristic textures present in the photo. | 8.485281 | ||
151,640 | Remove ear | 10 | The edited image (Image2) completely adheres to the editing instruction of removing an ear from the original image (Image1). There are no unintended removals or additions, and all specified objects have been accurately removed. The final result is a perfect match for the given instruction. | 6 | The image has some noticeable distortions and artifacts, particularly around the glasses. The reflection on the lenses appears unnatural with slight coloration anomalies that might suggest digital manipulation or low-quality rendering by AI algorithms. | 7.745967 | ||
79,632 | Remove the person | 0 | Image1 does not include the person specified for removal. | 7 | The image has a relatively high level of AI artifacts, particularly noticeable in the lighting and edges. The lines appear unnatural with some distortion around them. | 0 | ||
79,632 | Remove the suit jacket | 10 | The editing instruction was to remove the suit jacket from Image1. In Image2, the person is seen without a suit jacket but still wearing a white shirt and tie as required by the instructions. | 9 | The image appears to be a professional photograph of an individual in formal attire. There are minor distortions and unnatural textures, particularly noticeable around the background area where it looks slightly blurred or processed. The facial features appear natural with no unusual body parts or proportions. | 9.486833 | ||
79,632 | Remove the hair | 0 | Image1 does not include any objects specified for removal. Therefore, no further evaluation is required. | 7 | The image shows a person with an unnatural-looking mark on their head, which suggests the presence of AI-generated artifacts. The overall quality is decent but not perfect due to these noticeable distortions. | 0 | ||
79,632 | Remove the tie | 10 | The edited image (Image2) perfectly follows the editing instruction to remove any additional objects other than the person in Image1. The background and lighting are consistent, with no unintended additions or omissions. | 8 | The image shows a person with realistic features and natural skin texture, indicating that the AI-generated elements are well-integrated. The lighting appears soft but unevenly distributed in parts of the background which might be an artifact from the generation process. | 8.944272 | ||
79,632 | Remove the facial expression | 8 | The facial expression of the individual has been successfully removed, adhering to the editing instruction. However, there are some unintended removals where other parts of the background and lighting effects were also altered or lost in Image2. | 6 | The image exhibits a high level of detail and realism, suggesting that the AI-generated technology is quite advanced. However, there are some noticeable artifacts such as unnatural highlights on his face which appear too perfect compared to natural lighting. Additionally, minor distortions around the edges can be obser... | 6.928203 | ||
52,485 | Remove black dog | 10 | Image2 perfectly follows the editing instruction to remove a black dog. The original image (Image1) contains two dogs, one of which is black and white; however, in Image2, only one dog remains without any changes or additions. | 9 | The image effectively captures the rugged and snow-covered landscape. The texture of both the snow and rocks is well-defined, providing a sense of realism to the scene. However, there are minor distortions in some areas where colors appear slightly unnatural or blending inconsistencies can be observed. | 9.486833 | ||
52,485 | Remove white dog | 8 | The image successfully removed the white dog as instructed. However, Image2 includes objects that were not specified for removal (the black and white dog), which is an unintended addition. | 9 | The image effectively captures the natural scene of snow-covered rocks and a coniferous tree. The textures, such as the moss on the rock and the detailed snow patterns, are quite realistic. However, there is one minor artifact visible near the top right corner that slightly disrupts the overall quality. | 8.485281 | ||
52,485 | Remove both dogs | 0 | Image2 does not follow the editing instruction at all because it has removed both dogs from Image1. The original image should have two dogs, but they are missing in the edited version. | 8 | The image depicts a mountainous landscape with snow-covered peaks and rocky terrain. The textures of the rocks are well-detailed, showing patches where the snow has melted or blown off to reveal underlying rock structures. There is no significant distortion in shapes; however, some parts may have slightly unnatural tex... | 0 | ||
52,485 | Remove dog ears | 0 | Image2 does not follow the editing instruction at all. The dogs in Image1 have been removed, but no fox is present to replace them. | 9 | The image is highly effective with minimal artifacts. The fox has a natural appearance, and the snowy environment blends seamlessly around it without any noticeable distortions or unusual body parts or proportions. | 0 | ||
52,485 | Remove dog paw | 0 | Image2 does not follow the editing instruction at all. The image lacks any object that was specified for removal. | 8 | The image has a high level of detail and natural-looking textures, which suggests it is likely not AI-generated. The snow-covered rocks look realistic with appropriate shading and lighting effects. | 0 | ||
189,697 | Remove bus | 9 | The editing instruction was to remove a bus from the image. In Image2, all traces of buses have been successfully removed without any unintended changes or additions. | 6 | The image shows a realistic and coherent urban scene with minimal AI artifacts. However, there are some areas where slight distortions or unnatural textures can be observed. For example, the windows on the buildings appear slightly distorted in places, suggesting potential rendering issues common to early computer-gene... | 7.348469 | ||
189,697 | Remove white truck | 9 | Image2 accurately follows the editing instruction to remove the white truck from Image1. The rest of the image remains largely intact, with no unintended removals or additions other than what was specified in the instructions. | 8 | The image shows a typical street scene with buildings, shops, and vehicles. The details of the architecture, signage, and road markings are well-preserved without significant artifacts or distortions. There is some minor noise visible in certain areas which may indicate slight compression artifacts from digital process... | 8.485281 | ||
189,697 | Remove black car | 9 | The edited version (Image2) successfully removes the black car as instructed. There are no unintended objects missing or added, and all other elements in Image1 remain intact without any changes that affect their presence. | 6 | The image appears to be a genuine photograph of an urban street scene without noticeable AI artifacts. The buildings, vehicles, and signage are all consistent with the style typically found in historical photographs. | 7.348469 | ||
189,697 | Remove red car | 10 | The edited version of the image (Image2) successfully removes all instances of red cars present in the original image (Image1), adhering strictly to the editing instruction. The urban street scene remains intact, with no unintended removals or additions. | 9 | The image appears to be a well-composed photograph of an urban street scene, featuring buildings and vehicles with natural lighting. There are no apparent distortions or unusual artifacts that would suggest significant AI generation. | 9.486833 | ||
189,697 | Remove street lights | 8 | The edited version of the image successfully removed street lights as instructed. However, there are a few unintended omissions: traffic cones on the right side and possibly some small details that could be part of storefronts or vehicles which were not specified for removal. | 8 | The image has some noticeable distortions and artifacts, such as unnatural textures on the buildings' facades. The overall composition of the street scene is somewhat disjointed in terms of alignment between objects like cars and signboards. | 8 | ||
107,511 | Remove the boat | 10 | Image2 has accurately followed the editing instruction by removing the boat from Image1. There are no unintended removals or additions of new objects, and all elements not specified for removal remain intact. | 9 | The image is highly effective, showing minimal AI artifacts. The buildings are vibrant and detailed with natural-looking textures on the facades and roofs. There's a smooth transition between colors that appears organic rather than artificially generated. | 9.486833 | ||
107,511 | Remove the people rowing | 10 | Image2 is a perfect edited version of Image1 according to the instruction. The people rowing in the boat have been successfully removed as instructed, without any unintended removals or additions. | 9 | The image is technically high-quality with minimal artifacts. The buildings are vividly colored and detailed, though there may be slight distortions in the reflections on the water's surface. | 9.486833 | ||
107,511 | Remove flowers on buildings | 10 | Image2 is a perfect edited version of Image1 according to the instruction. The flowers on buildings have been successfully removed, and no unintended objects or additions are present. | 9 | The image is quite effective with minimal AI artifacts. The colors are vibrant and the details of the buildings, canal, and boats appear accurate. However, there might be slight unnatural texture patterns in some areas. | 9.486833 | ||
107,511 | Remove the awning | 10 | Image2 is a perfect edited version of Image1 according to the given instruction. The awning has been removed, and no unintended objects have been added or removed. | 8 | The image showcases a picturesque canal with vibrant, colorful buildings along the sides. The architecture is detailed and well-represented without noticeable distortions or unusual body parts/proportions. However, some of the textures on windows and shutters appear slightly unnatural compared to real-life counterparts... | 8.944272 | ||
107,511 | Remove the cloudy sky | 8 | The editing instruction was to remove the cloudy sky. In Image2, this has been effectively done as there is a clear blue sky in its place of the original image (Image1). However, some unintended removals might have occurred such as minor details that should not be removed according to the instructions. | 9 | The image is highly detailed and vibrant, with no noticeable distortions or artifacts. The buildings' textures are realistic, the colors vivid yet balanced, and there's a natural flow to the composition. | 8.485281 | ||
198,534 | Remove runners | 7 | The image has followed the instruction to remove runners from Image1. However, there are unintended removals of certain objects such as a person on stilts in the foreground and some smaller details that were not mentioned for removal. | 6 | The image has some noticeable AI artifacts, particularly in the text and splatter pattern on the wall. The letters 'AIT' have a slightly uneven texture that suggests they were generated by an algorithm rather than hand-drawn. Additionally, there are slight inconsistencies within the green splash design which may not be... | 6.480741 | ||
198,534 | Remove railing | 8 | The editing instruction was to remove the railing. In Image2, all traces of the railing have been removed successfully from Image1. | 7 | The image has some minor distortions and unnatural object shapes, particularly noticeable in the background mural. The green splatter effect appears slightly inconsistent with natural textures found on paper or walls. Additionally, there are slight color artifacts visible around certain areas of the runners' clothing. | 7.483315 | ||
198,534 | Remove green figure | 10 | The original image (Image1) includes a green figure that was specified for removal in the editing instruction. The edited version of Image2 successfully removes this object, leaving all other elements intact without any unintended additions or omissions. | 0 | The image is a high-quality, AI-generated depiction of an indoor track event. There are no visible distortions or unusual body parts/proportions in the athletes' images; their forms and clothing appear naturalistic with appropriate textures for athletic wear. The background elements like the wall art, seating area, and... | 0 | ||
198,534 | Remove blue chairs | 9 | The edited image successfully removes the blue chairs as instructed. However, there is one unintended removal of a logo and text on the far left side near the wall where no such objects were specified for removal. | 4 | There are some noticeable distortions and unusual body proportions in the AI-generated image. The background mural has a somewhat jagged, pixelated texture that is not present in natural photography of indoor sports facilities. | 6 | ||
198,534 | Remove trees outside | 9 | The edited image (Image2) effectively removes the trees outside, as instructed. The runners and other objects in Image1 are still present without any visible unintended removals or additions. | 9 | The image has minor distortions and a slightly unusual object shape in the logo, but overall it appears to be of high quality with no significant artifacts. The runners are clearly visible without any noticeable disruptions or unnatural textures. | 9 | ||
187,887 | Remove tree | 10 | The image Image2 accurately reflects the editing instruction to remove a tree from Image1. There are no unintended additions or omissions, and all aspects of the original church building with its surrounding gravestones remain intact without any unwanted changes. | 8 | The image shows a well-preserved church with clear architectural details, including the stone facade and stained glass windows. The gravestones in front of the church are also intact and arranged neatly on manicured grassy ground. There is minimal visible distortion or unnatural artifacts present. | 8.944272 | ||
187,887 | Remove gravestones | 8 | The edited image (Image2) effectively follows the editing instruction to remove gravestones from Image1. The removal of the tombstones and graves appears complete, leaving only the church building visible without any unwanted objects obstructing its view. | 9 | The image is of high quality, with very minimal AI artifacts. There are some slight inconsistencies in the texture and pattern that may suggest minor issues typical to generative models but overall it appears quite natural. | 8.485281 | ||
187,887 | Remove entrance door | 8 | The edited image (Image2) effectively removes the entrance door as instructed. However, there are some unintended omissions of objects not mentioned in the removal instructions: specifically, a few gravestones near the building have been removed or appear less distinct than they should be for an accurate representation... | 9 | The image shows a church with well-defined stone walls and an overall naturalistic look. The stonework appears consistent, without significant distortions or unnatural patterns in the textures of either the building materials or the surrounding landscape. | 8.485281 | ||
187,887 | Remove windows | 8 | The edited image (Image2) successfully removes windows as instructed. There are no unintended removals or additions, and all objects specified for removal have been adequately removed from the original image (Image1). The overall quality of Image2 aligns well with the instruction given. | 8 | The image displays a well-constructed stone church with visible textures and patterns, indicative of traditional masonry. The gravestones in the foreground are detailed but show some signs of weathering typical for older stones. There is no noticeable distortion or unnatural body parts/proportions; however, there could... | 8 | ||
187,887 | Remove roof | 10 | The original instruction was to remove the roof. However, it is evident that no changes have been made at all in Image2 as compared to Image1; both images are identical. | 8 | The image depicts a well-constructed stone church with distinct Gothic architectural features such as pointed arches, lancet windows, and buttresses. The building appears to be in good condition overall but shows some minor signs of wear typical for an old structure. There are no significant AI-generated artifacts visi... | 8.944272 | ||
198,904 | Remove bridge | 10 | The edited version (Image2) has successfully removed the bridge as per the instruction. There are no other unintended changes or omissions, and all relevant objects have been accurately removed. | 10 | The image is of high technical quality with no visible AI artifacts. The structures and elements are rendered accurately, showing consistent proportions and shapes without any noticeable distortions or unnatural features. | 10 | ||
198,904 | Remove steel beam | 0 | Image1 does not include any steel beams to remove, and Image2 completely changes the scene with a metal fence replacing the structure of the bridge. Thus, it fails both initial image check criteria. | 8 | The image has a high level of detail and realism, but there are noticeable artifacts such as distortions in the texture patterns. The grid-like pattern on top appears slightly irregular compared to typical geometric consistency seen in similar images. | 0 | ||
198,904 | Remove upper level | 0 | Image2 does not follow the editing instruction at all. The original image (Image1) contains a metal bridge structure and buildings, but Image2 shows an entirely different scene with no recognizable objects from Image1. | 7 | The image shows a large, flat surface that appears to be artificially rendered with visible distortions and artifacts. The edges of the surface are not perfectly smooth or symmetrical, indicating potential AI-generated imperfections. There is also an unnatural shadow pattern beneath some parts of this surface which see... | 0 | ||
198,904 | Remove upper beams | 7 | The editing instruction was to remove the upper beams from Image1. In Image2, most of these beams have been removed successfully; however, a few remain at the very top near the edge and center parts in between the supports. This indicates that not all objects were completely removed as instructed. | 8 | The image has minor distortions, such as slight warping of the concrete bridge and an unnatural appearance in some sections. The object shapes are mostly natural but there is a noticeable lack of detail or texture consistency that could indicate AI artifacts. | 7.483315 | ||
198,904 | Remove safety railing | 0 | The edited image does not match the instruction to remove a safety railing. Instead, it shows an entirely different scene with sand dunes and buildings. | 8 | The image has notable distortions and unnatural object shapes, particularly in the sand dune structure. The lines forming the texture of the dune appear too regular and artificial compared to natural formations found on a beach or desert. | 0 | ||
69,531 | Remove yellow sofa | 8 | The edited version of the image (Image2) effectively removes the yellow sofa as instructed, resulting in a cleaner and more streamlined space. The removal is complete without any visible remnants or incomplete edges around where the object was removed from Image1. However, there are some unintended additions to objects... | 8 | The image has minimal distortions and unusual body parts or proportions. However, there are some unnatural object shapes such as the large, conical light fixture on the left side of the room which appears too smooth and uniform in shape for a natural form. | 8 | ||
69,531 | Remove traditional pillows | 8 | The editing instruction was to remove traditional pillows. Image2 has removed the yellow couch cushions, which are the traditional pillows specified in the removal instruction. | 7 | The image shows a well-designed interior space with a warm and inviting ambiance. However, there are some noticeable artifacts such as slight distortion in the shape of objects like windows and doors which appears unnatural due to AI-generated rendering. Additionally, textures on certain surfaces seem slightly inconsis... | 7.483315 | ||
69,531 | Remove green doors | 10 | Image2 completely follows the editing instruction by removing all green doors from Image1, and no unintended objects have been added or removed. The overall aesthetic remains consistent with the original image. | 9 | The image is highly detailed and well-composed, with a rich color palette that enhances the architectural beauty of the space. The lighting appears natural yet warmly lit by interior sources like lamps or candles in some areas which adds depth to the scene. There are no significant AI artifacts visible; however, there'... | 9.486833 | ||
69,531 | Remove floor plants | 10 | Image2 follows the editing instruction perfectly by removing all floor plants, leaving no unintended removals or additions. The overall look is consistent with Image1. | 7 | The image has some noticeable distortions and unnatural elements, particularly around the ceiling and walls. The pattern on the left wall appears slightly off-center compared to other architectural details in the room. Additionally, there are areas where textures seem inconsistent or overly uniform. | 8.3666 | ||
139,799 | Remove red starfish | 8 | The image follows the editing instruction to remove red starfish. However, there is an unintended removal of a purple sea anemone in Image2. | 8 | The image has some minor distortions and unnatural textures, particularly around the edges of certain objects. The details in areas like the sea anemones seem slightly off from natural patterns observed under similar conditions. | 8 | ||
139,799 | Remove closest anemone | 8 | The editing instruction was to remove the closest anemone. The edited image (Image2) has successfully removed this specific anemone, which is evident as it no longer appears in Image2 compared to Image1. | 7 | The image contains some noticeable artifacts and distortions, particularly around the edges of objects. There are areas where textures appear unnatural or overly smoothed out compared to other parts of the image. The lighting is inconsistent across different regions as well. | 7.483315 | ||
139,799 | Remove long white anemone | 8 | Image2 appears to have successfully removed the long white anemones as specified in the editing instruction. The removal is nearly complete, with only minor remnants visible where some of these organisms were once present. There are no unintended objects missing or added, and Image1's other elements such as the starfis... | 7 | The image exhibits some noticeable artifacts and distortions. The starfish in the foreground shows unnatural edges, with a few pixels appearing blurred or out of place. There are also minor inconsistencies in texture within both the sea creatures' appendages (such as tentacles) and the surrounding environment. | 7.483315 | ||
139,799 | Remove purple anemone | 7 | The editing instruction specified to remove purple anemones. Upon examining Image2, the majority of what appears as a purple object has been removed successfully; however, there are still some remnants or residual parts that suggest incomplete removal. There is no evidence in Image1 showing any new objects added nor mi... | 8 | The image features various marine organisms with clear, well-defined textures and shapes. However, there are some areas where the edges appear slightly blurry or pixelated, indicating potential AI artifacts. | 7.483315 | ||
139,799 | Remove far left anemone | 8 | The editing instruction was to remove the far left anemone. The edited image (Image2) successfully removed that specific anemone, making Image1 and Image2 consistent with each other on this aspect. | 8 | The image shows a well-composed and detailed underwater scene with an array of sea creatures. However, there are noticeable distortions in the textures around some parts such as near the purple-colored creature's tentacles. These artifacts seem to disrupt the smoothness expected from natural marine scenes. | 8 | ||
64,273 | Remove the women | 0 | The image does not include any women, so it is a perfect edited version of Image1 according to the instruction. | 6 | The image has some noticeable AI artifacts, particularly in the rendering of the plastic bags and surrounding objects. The edges appear slightly distorted with unnatural textures such as jagged or uneven lines on parts of the bag designs. | 0 | ||
64,273 | Remove striped dress | 8 | The editing instruction was to remove the striped dress. Image2 does not contain this object, indicating that it has been successfully removed as per the instructions. | 6 | The image shows some noticeable distortions and unusual body parts or proportions. The blending between the three different people is not seamless, causing visible lines that indicate where they were merged together. There are also unnatural textures in certain areas such as the transitions between clothing patterns an... | 6.928203 | ||
64,273 | Remove green ties | 9 | Image2 follows the editing instruction to remove green ties accurately. The subjects in Image2 no longer have any visible ties with a green pattern, which matches the requirement specified for removal. | 6 | The image has a few noticeable distortions and artifacts. There are unusual body parts or proportions, particularly in the central figure where her arms appear elongated compared to other figures' limbs. Additionally, some of the object shapes seem unnatural, such as the exaggerated length of the woman on the right's a... | 7.348469 | ||
64,273 | Remove floral handbag | 10 | Image2 follows the editing instruction perfectly by removing all floral handbags from Image1. There are no unintended removals or additions, and there is complete adherence to the specified instructions. | 4 | The image exhibits some notable AI artifacts, such as unusual body proportions and unnatural object shapes. The central figure's head appears slightly distorted compared to the rest of her body, while the floral pattern on one woman’s dress extends beyond normal anatomical boundaries. | 6.324555 | ||
64,273 | Remove earrings | 10 | Image2 accurately follows the editing instruction to remove earrings from Image1. There are no unintended removals or additions, and all objects specified for removal have been completely removed. | 7 | The image has noticeable artifacts and distortions, particularly around the edges where there appears to be a blending or merging of different elements. The seamless integration is not perfect in certain areas, leading to visible lines that disrupt continuity between characters and backgrounds. Additionally, some facia... | 8.3666 | ||
166,792 | Remove child | 8 | The edited image largely follows the instruction to remove a child. However, it retains an object that resembles part of a stroller or cart in front of where the child was seated, which could be considered unintended removal if not specified as such. | 7 | The AI-generated image exhibits some noticeable artifacts, particularly in the sky and parts of people. The colors appear somewhat unnatural or too vibrant at times, which can indicate a lack of nuanced detail that is often present in real-life images. | 7.483315 | ||
166,792 | Remove balloon | 6 | The editing instruction was to remove a balloon, but the edited image does not show any changes in objects related to balloons. The presence of additional elements (a large pinwheel) that were not mentioned in the instructions indicates an unintended addition. | 9 | The image has minimal artifacts, with only slight distortions in the background and some unnatural object shapes. The AI-generated elements blend well into the original photo. | 7.348469 | ||
166,792 | Remove pinwheel | 9 | The editing instruction was to remove the pinwheel from Image1. In Image2, the pinwheel is indeed removed successfully with no visible remnants of it remaining in its place on the pole behind the child. | 8 | The image shows a young child sitting on grass with an outdoor background. The AI-generated elements seem to be well-integrated into the scene, without noticeable distortions or unusual body parts or proportions. However, there are some minor artifacts visible in areas such as clothing details and textures which slight... | 8.485281 | ||
166,792 | Remove entire attire | 8 | The editing instruction was to remove the entire attire. Image2 does a good job of removing all visible clothing from the child, including shoes and socks, which makes it look as if they are nude but still holding onto the kite handle for contextual continuity. | 8 | The image has some minor distortions and unusual body parts or proportions, particularly noticeable in the legs. The child's legs appear disproportionately large compared to their torso size. | 8 | ||
166,792 | Remove child's shoes | 10 | Image2 perfectly follows the editing instruction, which was to remove child's shoes. The shoes are absent in Image2 and no unintended objects were added or removed. | 6 | The image shows some noticeable AI artifacts, such as the unnatural shapes of the colorful flowers and leaves. The purple balloon appears too large for its position in relation to other objects but is otherwise realistic. | 7.745967 | ||
192,773 | Remove ball and chain | 8 | The image has successfully removed the ball and chain as per the instruction. The only issue is that there are no unintended removals or additions of new objects, so deduction points for those criteria remain at zero. | 9 | The image is largely artifact-free with clear text and objects. There are no significant distortions, unusual proportions or shapes in the depicted rings. | 8.485281 | ||
192,773 | Remove text | 8 | Image2 successfully removes the text as instructed. The objects present (ball and chain) are still relevant to the theme of slavery, maintaining thematic consistency with Image1. | 7 | The image has some noticeable distortions, particularly in the shading and reflection of light on objects. The texture appears slightly unnatural around these areas. | 7.483315 | ||
192,773 | Remove Abraham Lincoln | 8 | The edited image successfully removes the objects specified in the instruction, which are not present. However, there is an unintended removal of a significant historical artifact (the Abraham Lincoln quote) that was included for context and meaning. | 7 | The image contains some notable AI artifacts, particularly in the form of unnatural textures and patterns. The gradient background has an uneven appearance with visible horizontal bands that disrupt its smoothness. Additionally, there is a small white sphere on the bottom right which appears to be rendered without prop... | 7.483315 | ||
192,773 | Remove chain | 7 | The editing instruction was to remove the chain. In Image2, both the ball and handcuffs are present but not the entire chain as instructed. | 8 | The image is generally clear and well-composed, with a strong contrast between the black objects on a light background. However, there are slight distortions visible in some parts of the text box surrounding the quote, which may be due to imperfections or artifacts from AI generation. | 7.483315 | ||
192,773 | Remove shackle | 6 | The editing instruction was to remove the shackle from Image1. In Image2, one of the two handcuffs is removed as instructed; however, the other remains in place and a new object (a blurry circle) has been added that wasn't specified for removal or addition. | 8 | The image has a clear and legible text overlay with no significant distortions, unusual body parts or proportions, unnatural object shapes, or textures. The background is plain without any distracting elements that might indicate AI artifacts. | 6.928203 | ||
130,638 | Remove whiskey bottle | 8 | The edited version of the original image (Image2) successfully removes all objects specified in the instructions, including whiskey bottle. The table setting remains organized and visually appealing without any unintended removals or additions. | 6 | The image has some artifacts, particularly in the text on the cheese labels. The font appears slightly distorted and uneven compared to a typical digital rendering or photograph of printed material. | 6.928203 | ||
130,638 | Remove cheese platter | 8 | The editing instruction was to remove the cheese platter, and Image2 has successfully removed it. However, a small piece of cracker is still visible in Image2 which should have been completely removed according to the instructions. | 6 | The AI-generated image has noticeable distortions, especially in the text on the packaging and cracker boxes. The fonts appear inconsistent with each other, leading to an unnatural look overall. While some parts of the objects are well-rendered (such as the bottle), others show signs of blending or color inconsistency ... | 6.928203 | ||
130,638 | Remove red candle | 9 | The editing instruction was to remove the red candle from Image1. In Image2, all traces of the red candle have been removed effectively and accurately without affecting other objects in the image. | 9 | The image is of high technical quality, with minimal artifacts. The textures and patterns are realistic, especially the cheese slices which exhibit fine detail in their appearance. | 9 | ||
130,638 | Remove snack cracker box | 8 | The editing instruction was to remove the snack cracker box from Image1. In Image2, we can see that the snack cracker box is no longer present on the table where it should have been removed. | 8 | The image has a few noticeable artifacts, particularly around the text on some of the cheese labels and possibly in parts where there is high contrast between colors. However, overall the quality seems quite good with minimal distortion or unusual object shapes. | 8 | ||
130,638 | Remove glass of whiskey | 7 | The editing instruction was to remove a glass of whiskey from Image1. The edited image (Image2) successfully removed the glass, leaving all other objects intact and unchanged. | 8 | The image is generally clear with well-defined objects, indicating good technical quality. The textures and patterns are mostly natural-looking without significant artifacts or distortions. However, the AI-generated elements might still show minor inconsistencies in details compared to a perfectly crafted digital artwo... | 7.483315 | ||
92,850 | Remove large rock | 0 | The instruction was to remove a large rock from Image1, but no such object is present in either Image1 or Image2. Therefore, the image does not follow the editing instruction at all. | 9 | The image is highly detailed with naturalistic textures and patterns. The water flow appears realistic, and the vegetation adds to the authenticity of the scene. However, there are minor distortions in some areas where the edges seem slightly uneven or blurred. | 0 | ||
92,850 | Remove tree | 10 | Image2 accurately follows the editing instruction by removing a tree, and there are no unintended additions or omissions. The image is consistent with Image1. | 7 | The image features a waterfall and rock formations, which are depicted with some AI artifacts. The textures of the rocks appear slightly inconsistent in their shading and detail compared to natural photographs. There is noticeable distortion around certain areas where the artificial nature becomes evident, particularly... | 8.3666 | ||
92,850 | Remove waterfall | 8 | The editing instruction was to remove the waterfall from Image1. In Image2, there is no visible presence of a waterfall in its place where it should have been removed; hence this part meets the requirement well. However, due to some unintended removals (missing objects that were not specified for removal), such as gree... | 10 | The image does not show any significant artifacts or distortions, and the textures of moss-covered rocks appear natural. There are no unusual body parts or proportions nor unnatural object shapes. | 8.944272 | ||
92,850 | Remove bushes | 8 | The edited image (Image2) has effectively removed the bushes from Image1, as instructed. However, there are a few unintended removals that slightly detract from its perfection: some smaller plants or moss patches near the waterfall have also been inadvertently removed. | 9 | The image showcases a natural rock formation with an impressive waterfall, exhibiting realistic textures and patterns. There are minor distortions in the foliage on the rocks but overall, it appears to be of high quality without significant AI artifacts. | 8.485281 | ||
92,850 | Remove fern | 9 | The image is very close to being a perfect edited version of the original according to the instruction. The fern has been effectively removed from Image1, and there are no unintended removals or additions present in Image2. | 8 | The image is highly detailed and features natural textures such as rocks, mosses, and water. However, there are some areas where the textures appear unnaturally smooth or uniformed in certain regions. | 8.485281 | ||
109,027 | Remove the girl | 9 | Image2 follows the editing instruction to remove the girl from Image1, as no girl is present in Image2. There are no unintended removals or additions of new objects. | 9 | The image has very minimal artifacts and is generally of high quality. The colors are rich, the textures smooth, and there's a nice balance between natural elements like trees, water, and sky, as well as human-made objects such as signs. However, some subtle distortions can be observed in certain areas where blending o... | 9 | ||
109,027 | Remove bus stop sign | 10 | The edited image (Image2) has successfully removed the bus stop sign as instructed in Image1. The girl, trees, and other elements remain intact without any unintended removals or additions. | 9 | The image has a high level of detail and artistic quality, with vibrant colors and smooth textures. There are minor distortions in the foliage on the right side where some leaves appear unnaturally shaped or too perfect compared to others around them. | 9.486833 | ||
109,027 | Remove trees | 10 | Image2 successfully follows the editing instruction to remove trees from Image1. The scene is now clear, with no visible tree structures present that were in the original image. | 8 | The image is highly effective with minimal visible AI artifacts. The colors, textures of the sky and clouds are well blended without any noticeable distortions or unnatural shapes in these elements. However, there might be slight imperfections around the transition between different areas like the girl's dress blending... | 8.944272 | ||
109,027 | Remove the dress | 9 | The original image (Image1) includes an object, the dress of the girl in white. In Image2, this dress is removed successfully according to the editing instruction. However, there are unintended omissions: a small detail on her hair and accessories like earrings or necklaces that were not mentioned for removal but still... | 8 | The image has a very high level of technical quality with minimal artifacts. The colors are vibrant and blend well, creating an immersive atmosphere. However, there is some minor distortion visible in the reflection on the water surface near the center-right part of the image. | 8.485281 | ||
109,027 | Remove braided hair | 10 | The edited image (Image2) successfully removes the braided hair from Image1 as instructed, while retaining all other elements. There are no unintended additions or omissions of objects in this edit. | 8 | The image has a high level of artistic quality with beautiful colors and lighting. However, there are some slight distortions in the depiction of certain objects such as trees and buildings which might be indicative of AI-generated artifacts. | 8.944272 | ||
138,265 | Remove ladder | 8 | The editing instruction was to remove the ladder from Image1. The edited version, Image2, successfully removes the ladder while maintaining most other elements intact and not introducing unintended removals or additions. | 8 | The image has significant AI artifacts, particularly noticeable in the textured areas of the model. The shadows and lighting are inconsistent with natural sources, indicating possible digital manipulation or lack of real-world accuracy. | 8 | ||
138,265 | Remove blueprints | 8 | The editing instruction was to remove blueprints. In Image2, the large model on the wall appears to have most of its blueprint elements removed, which aligns with the instructions given. However, some minor details or remaining traces might still be present in the upper right corner near where a black bag is placed. | 7 | The image is mostly clear with good technical quality, but there are noticeable distortions and artifacts around the edges of the wall. The corners appear slightly misaligned or distorted, which indicates a lack of precision in rendering these areas. | 7.483315 | ||
138,265 | Remove cardboard model | 8 | The instruction was to remove cardboard models from Image1. In Image2, most of the cardboard model has been removed successfully but a small part at the bottom right is still visible which should have been removed completely. | 7 | The image contains some artifacts, particularly noticeable in the texture of the wall and around the edges where there are visible marks. The ladder appears slightly distorted near its base. However, overall, it does not have any significant distortions or unusual body parts/proportions. | 7.483315 | ||
138,265 | Remove black bags | 8 | The edited image (Image2) has successfully removed the black bags as instructed. However, there is one unintended removal of a cardboard piece from Image1 that does not appear to be part of the original instruction for removal. | 5 | The image contains several AI-generated artifacts, including noticeable distortions and unnatural object shapes. The textures appear somewhat uniform with inconsistent patterns on the wooden elements of the model structure. | 6.324555 | ||
138,265 | Remove ceiling beam | 8 | The ceiling beam was successfully removed from the image. However, there are some unintended removals of objects such as a black bag and other items that were not mentioned in the instructions. | 7 | The image shows an AI-generated model of a cityscape with several noticeable distortions and artifacts. The textures appear somewhat unnatural, particularly in the skyline structures where some elements seem overly smooth or pixelated compared to real-world textures. There are also areas within the building models that... | 7.483315 |
README.md exists but content is empty.
- Downloads last month
- 3