uid stringclasses 10
values | dataset_id stringclasses 1
value | jurisdiction stringclasses 3
values | court_level stringclasses 5
values | year int64 2.02k 2.02k | area_of_law stringclasses 3
values | pillar stringclasses 1
value | series stringclasses 1
value | input_issue_scope stringclasses 10
values | input_statement_paragraphs_summary stringclasses 10
values | input_timeline_summary stringclasses 10
values | input_exhibit_list_and_refs stringclasses 10
values | input_internal_consistency_flags stringclasses 6
values | input_hearsay_and_scope_flags stringclasses 7
values | question stringclasses 2
values | ground_truth_label stringclasses 3
values | ground_truth_rationale stringclasses 10
values | outcome_signal stringclasses 4
values | early_window_months stringclasses 3
values | source_citation stringclasses 1
value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WS-TR-001 | legal-witness-statement-chronology-exhibit-internal-consistency-v0.1 | UK | High Court | 2,023 | Commercial | legal_actors | 3C | Issues delivery date and losses | Paras state contract signed 1 Feb. Delivery due 1 May. Delivered 15 May. Emails attached. | Timeline lists 1 Feb sign 1 May due 15 May delivered | Exhibit A contract Exhibit B email 10 May Exhibit C delivery note | No conflicts | No scope drift | Is witness statement coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | Chronology and exhibits align with no internal conflicts. | stable | 0 | Synthetic |
WS-TR-002 | legal-witness-statement-chronology-exhibit-internal-consistency-v0.1 | UK | High Court | 2,023 | Commercial | legal_actors | 3C | Delivery issue only | Paras say delivery 15 May but later say delivery 5 May | Timeline shows delivery 15 May | Exhibit C delivery note referenced but not in list | Date conflict present | No hearsay flag | Is witness statement coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | Date conflict and missing exhibit reference. | credibility_risk | 1 | Synthetic |
WS-TR-003 | legal-witness-statement-chronology-exhibit-internal-consistency-v0.1 | US | Federal | 2,022 | Employment | legal_actors | 3C | Issue retaliation sequence | Paras set complaint 3 Jan termination 20 Feb meeting 10 Feb | Timeline matches complaint meeting termination | Exhibits: A complaint email B meeting notes C termination letter | No conflicts | No scope drift | Is witness statement coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | Narrative matches timeline and exhibits. | stable | 0 | Synthetic |
WS-TR-004 | legal-witness-statement-chronology-exhibit-internal-consistency-v0.1 | US | Federal | 2,022 | Employment | legal_actors | 3C | Retaliation sequence | Paras mention meeting 10 Feb but timeline omits it | Timeline lists complaint and termination only | Exhibit B meeting notes referenced but not provided | Missing event and exhibit | Scope ok | Is witness statement coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | Key event missing from timeline and exhibit missing. | credibility_risk | 1 | Synthetic |
WS-TR-005 | legal-witness-statement-chronology-exhibit-internal-consistency-v0.1 | UK | County Court | 2,022 | Property | legal_actors | 3C | Issue damp and notice | Paras list damp noticed March repair report April follow up May | Timeline lists March April May | Exhibits: photos March repair request email April GP note | No conflicts | Hearsay framed as 'I was told' where used | Is witness statement coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | Chronology consistent and hearsay handled. | stable | 0 | Synthetic |
WS-TR-006 | legal-witness-statement-chronology-exhibit-internal-consistency-v0.1 | UK | County Court | 2,022 | Property | legal_actors | 3C | Damp and notice | Paras claim 'landlord admitted fault' without source | Timeline dates inconsistent with paras | Exhibit list lacks admission doc | Inconsistencies present | Hearsay stated as fact | Is witness statement coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | Unanchored claims with timeline and exhibit gaps. | credibility_risk | 1 | Synthetic |
WS-TR-007 | legal-witness-statement-chronology-exhibit-internal-consistency-v0.1 | EU | Commercial Court | 2,020 | Commercial | legal_actors | 3C | Issue non-payment | Paras state invoice sent 1 Feb reminders 10 Feb 1 Mar | Timeline matches | Exhibits: invoice reminders ledger | No conflicts | No scope drift | Is witness statement coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | Clean alignment between narrative and proof. | stable | 0 | Synthetic |
WS-TR-008 | legal-witness-statement-chronology-exhibit-internal-consistency-v0.1 | EU | Commercial Court | 2,020 | Commercial | legal_actors | 3C | Non-payment only | Paras include allegations of unrelated fraud | Timeline focuses invoice only | Exhibit list includes none for fraud | Scope drift flag | No hearsay framing | Is witness statement coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | Scope drift beyond issues with no support. | scope_creep_risk | 1 | Synthetic |
WS-TR-009 | legal-witness-statement-chronology-exhibit-internal-consistency-v0.1 | UK | Tribunal | 2,021 | Employment | legal_actors | 3C | Issue procedure fairness | Paras list meetings dates and outcomes | Timeline matches meetings | Exhibits: meeting invite notes appeal email | No conflicts | No scope drift | Is witness statement coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | Consistent record with exhibits. | stable | 0 | Synthetic |
WS-TR-010 | legal-witness-statement-chronology-exhibit-internal-consistency-v0.1 | UK | Tribunal | 2,021 | Employment | legal_actors | 3C | Procedure fairness | Paras cite Exhibit D appeal email but exhibit list ends at C | Timeline has wrong date for appeal | Missing exhibit and date mismatch | No hearsay framing | Is witness statement coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | Exhibit reference missing and timeline mismatch. | credibility_risk | 1 | Synthetic | null |
What this dataset does
You receive
issue scope statement summary timeline summary exhibit list and refs consistency flags hearsay and scope flags
You decide
coherent or incoherent
Daily use
witness statement QC
chronology checks
exhibit reference checks
scope drift flag
credibility risk routing
- Downloads last month
- 25