Datasets:

ClarusC64
/

legal-statutory-age-obsolescence-trajectory-v0.1

uid stringclasses 10 values	dataset_id stringclasses 1 value	jurisdiction stringclasses 3 values	court_level stringclasses 6 values	year int64 2.02k 2.02k	area_of_law stringclasses 10 values	pillar stringclasses 1 value	series stringclasses 1 value	input_statute_age_years int64 5 50	input_amendment_frequency stringclasses 6 values	input_judicial_reinterpretation_rate stringclasses 3 values	input_social_tech_change stringclasses 10 values	input_legislative_review_signals stringclasses 9 values	input_case_signals stringclasses 9 values	question stringclasses 1 value	ground_truth_label stringclasses 2 values	ground_truth_rationale stringclasses 10 values	outcome_signal stringclasses 3 values	early_window_months int64 0 11	source_citation stringclasses 1 value
SA-TR-001	legal-statutory-age-obsolescence-trajectory-v0.1	UK	High Court	2,022	Transport	substantive_law	1A	45	Low	High reinterpretation	Tech changed driving behavior	Law commission review pending	Courts flag outdated wording	Is statute still coherent with present conditions. Answer coherent or incoherent.	incoherent	Age plus reinterpretation and reform signals show drift.	reform_risk	10	Synthetic
SA-TR-002	legal-statutory-age-obsolescence-trajectory-v0.1	US	Federal	2,019	Tax	substantive_law	1A	5	Recent updates	Low reinterpretation	Economic context stable	No reform signals	Courts apply text easily	Is statute still coherent with present conditions. Answer coherent or incoherent.	coherent	Recent statute and stable context remain aligned.	stable	0	Synthetic
SA-TR-003	legal-statutory-age-obsolescence-trajectory-v0.1	EU	Appellate	2,018	Digital	substantive_law	1A	20	Moderate	High reinterpretation	Rapid tech evolution	Consultation underway	Courts stretching definitions	Is statute still coherent with present conditions. Answer coherent or incoherent.	incoherent	Rapid tech change outpaces statute.	reform_risk	8	Synthetic
SA-TR-004	legal-statutory-age-obsolescence-trajectory-v0.1	UK	Court of Appeal	2,016	Property	substantive_law	1A	30	Periodic updates	Low reinterpretation	Social context stable	No reform push	Courts consistent	Is statute still coherent with present conditions. Answer coherent or incoherent.	coherent	Updates and stable context preserve coherence.	stable	0	Synthetic
SA-TR-005	legal-statutory-age-obsolescence-trajectory-v0.1	US	State Court	2,020	Cannabis	substantive_law	1A	50	null	High reinterpretation	Market changed drastically	Legislative reform pending	Courts face conflicts	Is statute still coherent with present conditions. Answer coherent or incoherent.	incoherent	Old statute diverges from actual regulated practice.	doctrinal_shift_risk	9	Synthetic
SA-TR-006	legal-statutory-age-obsolescence-trajectory-v0.1	EU	Trial	2,021	Consumer	substantive_law	1A	10	Recent amendment	Low reinterpretation	Commerce stable	No reform signals	Courts apply normally	Is statute still coherent with present conditions. Answer coherent or incoherent.	coherent	Recent amendment keeps law aligned.	stable	0	Synthetic
SA-TR-007	legal-statutory-age-obsolescence-trajectory-v0.1	UK	High Court	2,023	AI Regulation	substantive_law	1A	35	null	High reinterpretation	AI tech surge	Policy consultation active	Courts struggle with scope	Is statute still coherent with present conditions. Answer coherent or incoherent.	incoherent	Age and tech change produce mismatch.	reform_risk	6	Synthetic
SA-TR-008	legal-statutory-age-obsolescence-trajectory-v0.1	US	Federal	2,017	Environment	substantive_law	1A	25	Moderate	Moderate reinterpretation	Environmental conditions stable	No major reform	Courts stable	Is statute still coherent with present conditions. Answer coherent or incoherent.	coherent	Moderate updates maintain relevance.	stable	0	Synthetic
SA-TR-009	legal-statutory-age-obsolescence-trajectory-v0.1	EU	Appellate	2,022	Employment	substantive_law	1A	40	Low	High reinterpretation	Gig economy shift	Review underway	Courts diverging	Is statute still coherent with present conditions. Answer coherent or incoherent.	incoherent	New labor models diverge from statute.	reform_risk	11	Synthetic
SA-TR-010	legal-statutory-age-obsolescence-trajectory-v0.1	UK	High Court	2,015	Contract	substantive_law	1A	15	Recent update	Low reinterpretation	Commercial practice stable	No reform	Courts consistent	Is statute still coherent with present conditions. Answer coherent or incoherent.	coherent	Statute still fits practice.	stable	0	Synthetic

What this dataset is

You receive

statute age amendment frequency reinterpretation rate real world change signals reform signals

You decide

Has the statute drifted out of alignment with reality

Answer

coherent or incoherent

Why this matters

Before repeal or amendment courts begin stretching reinterpretation rises reform signals appear

This dataset detects statutory obsolescence early.

Downloads last month: 4

Number of rows:

Total file size:

11.3 kB