Datasets:
uid stringclasses 10
values | dataset_id stringclasses 1
value | jurisdiction stringclasses 3
values | court_level stringclasses 5
values | year int64 2.02k 2.02k | area_of_law stringclasses 7
values | pillar stringclasses 1
value | series stringclasses 1
value | input_legal_aid_demand stringclasses 5
values | input_legal_aid_capacity stringclasses 9
values | input_representation_rate stringclasses 5
values | input_wait_time stringclasses 4
values | input_case_outcomes stringclasses 9
values | input_policy_signals stringclasses 10
values | question stringclasses 1
value | ground_truth_label stringclasses 2
values | ground_truth_rationale stringclasses 10
values | outcome_signal stringclasses 2
values | early_window_months int64 0 9 | source_citation stringclasses 1
value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LA-TR-001 | legal-aid-demand-capacity-coherence-decay-v0.1 | UK | County Court | 2,021 | Civil | systemic_legal_coherence | 4B | Moderate demand | Adequate capacity | High representation | Short wait | Merits reached | Stable funding | Does aid capacity match demand. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | Capacity meets demand and representation remains high. | stable | 0 | Synthetic |
LA-TR-002 | legal-aid-demand-capacity-coherence-decay-v0.1 | UK | County Court | 2,020 | Family | systemic_legal_coherence | 4B | High demand | Reduced capacity | Low representation | Long wait | Defaults and unsafe settlements | Funding cuts | Does aid capacity match demand. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | Demand exceeds supply leading to low representation. | access_failure_risk | 9 | Synthetic |
LA-TR-003 | legal-aid-demand-capacity-coherence-decay-v0.1 | US | State | 2,019 | Housing | systemic_legal_coherence | 4B | High eviction demand | Expanded aid capacity | Moderate representation | Manageable wait | More hearings on merits | Pilot funding | Does aid capacity match demand. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | Expanded capacity improves representation. | stable | 0 | Synthetic |
LA-TR-004 | legal-aid-demand-capacity-coherence-decay-v0.1 | US | State | 2,018 | Debt | systemic_legal_coherence | 4B | High demand | Very low capacity | Very low representation | Long wait | Defaults dominate | Advocacy reports | Does aid capacity match demand. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | Severe capacity gap drives defaults. | access_failure_risk | 7 | Synthetic |
LA-TR-005 | legal-aid-demand-capacity-coherence-decay-v0.1 | EU | Trial | 2,022 | Consumer | systemic_legal_coherence | 4B | Moderate demand | Adequate capacity | High representation | Short wait | Merits reached | Stable policy | Does aid capacity match demand. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | Balanced system keeps access intact. | stable | 0 | Synthetic |
LA-TR-006 | legal-aid-demand-capacity-coherence-decay-v0.1 | UK | Tribunal | 2,023 | Employment | systemic_legal_coherence | 4B | High demand | Limited advisors | Low representation | Long wait | Claims abandoned | Review underway | Does aid capacity match demand. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | Advisor shortage leads to abandonment. | access_failure_risk | 6 | Synthetic |
LA-TR-007 | legal-aid-demand-capacity-coherence-decay-v0.1 | US | Federal | 2,020 | Civil Rights | systemic_legal_coherence | 4B | Moderate demand | Clinic support available | Moderate representation | Manageable wait | Cases proceed | Grant funding | Does aid capacity match demand. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | Support structures align supply and demand. | stable | 0 | Synthetic |
LA-TR-008 | legal-aid-demand-capacity-coherence-decay-v0.1 | EU | Trial | 2,021 | Civil | systemic_legal_coherence | 4B | Rising demand | Static capacity | Declining representation | Long wait | More pro se losses | Policy concern | Does aid capacity match demand. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | Static capacity under rising demand reduces representation. | access_failure_risk | 8 | Synthetic |
LA-TR-009 | legal-aid-demand-capacity-coherence-decay-v0.1 | UK | County Court | 2,019 | Housing | systemic_legal_coherence | 4B | High eviction demand | Emergency funding boost | Moderate representation | Shorter wait | More defended cases | Temporary funding | Does aid capacity match demand. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | Emergency funding restored capacity temporarily. | stable | 0 | Synthetic |
LA-TR-010 | legal-aid-demand-capacity-coherence-decay-v0.1 | US | State | 2,021 | Family | systemic_legal_coherence | 4B | High custody demand | Limited aid lawyers | Low representation | Long wait | Unsafe agreements | Bar reports | Does aid capacity match demand. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | Capacity gap produces unsafe outcomes. | access_failure_risk | 5 | Synthetic |
What this dataset is
You receive
legal aid demand capacity representation rate wait time case outcomes policy signals
You decide
Does capacity match demand
Answer
coherent or incoherent
Why this matters
Capacity gaps predict
pro se surge unsafe settlements default growth system strain
- Downloads last month
- 9