Datasets:
uid string | dataset_id string | jurisdiction string | court_level string | year int64 | area_of_law string | pillar string | series string | input_bundle_index_summary string | input_pagination_ranges_summary string | input_exhibit_references_in_file string | input_chronology_summary string | input_missing_doc_flags string | input_duplicate_doc_flags string | question string | ground_truth_label string | ground_truth_rationale string | outcome_signal string | early_window_months int64 | source_citation string |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BD-TR-001 | legal-hearing-bundle-index-pagination-exhibit-coherence-risk-v0.1 | UK | High Court | 2,023 | Commercial | adjudicative_process | 2C | Index: A1 contract pp1-20 A2 emails pp21-60 A3 invoice pp61-70 | Ranges non-overlapping and sequential | Refs: contract p5 email 12 p33 invoice p65 | Chronology items map to A1 A2 A3 | None missing | No duplicates | Is bundle coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | Index pagination and refs align. | stable | 0 | Synthetic |
BD-TR-002 | legal-hearing-bundle-index-pagination-exhibit-coherence-risk-v0.1 | UK | High Court | 2,023 | Commercial | adjudicative_process | 2C | Index: A1 contract pp1-20 A2 emails pp21-60 A3 invoice pp61-70 | Ranges ok | Refs: email 15 p45 and delivery note p72 | Chronology includes delivery note | Missing: delivery note not in bundle | No duplicates | Is bundle coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | Referenced exhibit missing. | hearing_risk | 0 | Synthetic |
BD-TR-003 | legal-hearing-bundle-index-pagination-exhibit-coherence-risk-v0.1 | US | Federal | 2,022 | Employment | adjudicative_process | 2C | Index: Tab1 complaint pp1-15 Tab2 emails pp16-55 Tab3 HR memo pp56-70 | Ranges ok | Refs: HR memo p60 email p22 | Chronology maps to tabs | None missing | No duplicates | Is bundle coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | References resolve correctly. | stable | 0 | Synthetic |
BD-TR-004 | legal-hearing-bundle-index-pagination-exhibit-coherence-risk-v0.1 | US | Federal | 2,022 | Employment | adjudicative_process | 2C | Index: Tab1 complaint pp1-15 Tab2 emails pp16-55 Tab3 HR memo pp50-70 | Overlap: Tab2 ends 55 Tab3 starts 50 | Refs: HR memo p60 | Chronology ok | Potential mis-pagination | Duplicates none | Is bundle coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | Overlapping ranges create page ambiguity. | hearing_risk | 0 | Synthetic |
BD-TR-005 | legal-hearing-bundle-index-pagination-exhibit-coherence-risk-v0.1 | UK | County Court | 2,022 | Property | adjudicative_process | 2C | Index: Photos pp1-30 Letters pp31-60 GP note pp61-65 | Ranges ok | Refs: GP note p62 letter p40 | Chronology maps | None missing | No duplicates | Is bundle coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | Bundle consistent. | stable | 0 | Synthetic |
BD-TR-006 | legal-hearing-bundle-index-pagination-exhibit-coherence-risk-v0.1 | UK | County Court | 2,022 | Property | adjudicative_process | 2C | Index: Photos pp1-30 Letters pp31-60 GP note pp61-65 | Ranges ok | Refs: repair invoice p66 | Chronology includes invoice | Missing: repair invoice | No duplicates | Is bundle coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | Key exhibit referenced but absent. | hearing_risk | 1 | Synthetic |
BD-TR-007 | legal-hearing-bundle-index-pagination-exhibit-coherence-risk-v0.1 | EU | Commercial Court | 2,020 | Commercial | adjudicative_process | 2C | Index: Contract pp1-25 Ledger pp26-45 Invoices pp46-80 | Ranges ok | Refs: invoice #3 p60 | Chronology maps | None missing | Duplicate invoice #2 appears twice but flagged | Is bundle coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | Duplicates flagged and no missing refs. | stable | 0 | Synthetic |
BD-TR-008 | legal-hearing-bundle-index-pagination-exhibit-coherence-risk-v0.1 | EU | Commercial Court | 2,020 | Commercial | adjudicative_process | 2C | Index: Contract pp1-25 Ledger pp26-45 Invoices pp46-80 | Ranges ok | Refs: invoice #5 p74 | Chronology maps | Missing: invoice #5 replaced by duplicate invoice #2 | Duplicate invoice #2 unflagged | Is bundle coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | Duplicate masks missing key exhibit. | hearing_risk | 0 | Synthetic |
BD-TR-009 | legal-hearing-bundle-index-pagination-exhibit-coherence-risk-v0.1 | UK | Tribunal | 2,021 | Employment | adjudicative_process | 2C | Index: ET1 pp1-10 Notes pp11-35 Emails pp36-60 | Ranges ok | Refs: meeting note p20 email p40 | Chronology maps | None missing | No duplicates | Is bundle coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | Consistent index and refs. | stable | 0 | Synthetic |
BD-TR-010 | legal-hearing-bundle-index-pagination-exhibit-coherence-risk-v0.1 | UK | Tribunal | 2,021 | Employment | adjudicative_process | 2C | Index: ET1 pp1-10 Notes pp11-35 Emails pp36-60 | Ranges ok | Refs: email p58 but p58 contains different email than referenced | Chronology mismatch flagged | Missing doc flags none | Duplicate flags none | Is bundle coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | Page reference resolves to wrong document. | hearing_risk | 0 | Synthetic |
What this dataset does You receive index summary pagination ranges exhibit references chronology summary missing flags duplicate flags You decide coherent or incoherent Daily use
bundle QC
missing exhibit detection
broken page ref detection
index repair support
- Downloads last month
- 12