Datasets:
uid string | dataset_id string | jurisdiction string | court_level string | year int64 | area_of_law string | pillar string | series string | input_engagement_scope_text string | input_exclusions_text string | input_fee_basis_text string | input_client_objectives string | input_later_work_done_summary string | input_client_communications_summary string | question string | ground_truth_label string | ground_truth_rationale string | outcome_signal string | early_window_months int64 | source_citation string |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EN-TR-001 | legal-engagement-letter-scope-fee-communication-coherence-risk-v0.1 | UK | Firm Intake | 2,023 | Commercial | legal_actors | 3A | Scope: pre-action advice and letter before action only | Excludes: issuing proceedings and hearings | Hourly rates set out; estimates for LBA | Objective: recover £80k quickly | Work: advice and LBA drafted only | Emails confirm scope and next steps require new instruction | Is engagement coherence intact. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | Work matches scope and comms align. | stable | 0 | Synthetic |
EN-TR-002 | legal-engagement-letter-scope-fee-communication-coherence-risk-v0.1 | UK | Firm Intake | 2,023 | Commercial | legal_actors | 3A | Scope: pre-action advice and LBA only | Excludes: proceedings | Hourly rates set out | Objective: recover £80k | Work: issued claim form and attended directions hearing | No variation letter or scope update email | Is engagement coherence intact. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | Work outside scope without variation. | billing_dispute_risk | 1 | Synthetic |
EN-TR-003 | legal-engagement-letter-scope-fee-communication-coherence-risk-v0.1 | US | Firm Intake | 2,022 | Employment | legal_actors | 3A | Scope: defend EEOC charge through position statement | Excludes: litigation | Fixed fee $12k | Objective: resolve at agency stage | Work: position statement filed | Comms confirm fixed fee and scope | Is engagement coherence intact. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | Aligned delivery to scope. | stable | 0 | Synthetic |
EN-TR-004 | legal-engagement-letter-scope-fee-communication-coherence-risk-v0.1 | US | Firm Intake | 2,022 | Employment | legal_actors | 3A | Scope: defend EEOC charge | Excludes: litigation | Fixed fee $12k | Objective: resolve | Work: filed federal motion to dismiss | No written expansion or new fee terms | Is engagement coherence intact. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | Scope and fee basis breached. | billing_dispute_risk | 0 | Synthetic |
EN-TR-005 | legal-engagement-letter-scope-fee-communication-coherence-risk-v0.1 | UK | Firm Intake | 2,022 | Property | legal_actors | 3A | Scope: housing disrepair claim to settlement or issue | Excludes: trial unless agreed | Conditional fee agreement terms set out | Objective: repairs and compensation | Work: protocol letter and negotiations only | Client emails show understanding of next steps | Is engagement coherence intact. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | Scope held and client aligned. | stable | 0 | Synthetic |
EN-TR-006 | legal-engagement-letter-scope-fee-communication-coherence-risk-v0.1 | UK | Firm Intake | 2,022 | Property | legal_actors | 3A | Scope: disrepair claim | Exclusions unclear | Fee: CFA but billing shows hourly | Objective: repairs | Work: mixed work plus counsel instructed | Comms show client surprised by invoice | Is engagement coherence intact. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | Fee basis conflicts and scope unclear. | billing_dispute_risk | 1 | Synthetic |
EN-TR-007 | legal-engagement-letter-scope-fee-communication-coherence-risk-v0.1 | EU | Firm Intake | 2,020 | Commercial | legal_actors | 3A | Scope: contract review and negotiation only | Excludes: disputes | Hourly with cap €20k | Objective: sign supplier deal | Work: contract marked up and negotiated | Emails confirm cap and scope | Is engagement coherence intact. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | Aligned and capped. | stable | 0 | Synthetic |
EN-TR-008 | legal-engagement-letter-scope-fee-communication-coherence-risk-v0.1 | EU | Firm Intake | 2,020 | Commercial | legal_actors | 3A | Scope: contract review only | Excludes: disputes | Cap €20k | Objective: sign deal | Work: later handled dispute letter and threatened injunction | No written scope change; cap exceeded | Is engagement coherence intact. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | Scope drift and cap breach. | billing_dispute_risk | 0 | Synthetic |
EN-TR-009 | legal-engagement-letter-scope-fee-communication-coherence-risk-v0.1 | UK | Firm Intake | 2,021 | Employment | legal_actors | 3A | Scope: advice on settlement agreement only | Excludes: tribunal proceedings | Fixed fee £750 | Objective: sign with safe terms | Work: reviewed and advised; minor edits | Comms confirm fixed fee | Is engagement coherence intact. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | Clean scoped advice. | stable | 0 | Synthetic |
EN-TR-010 | legal-engagement-letter-scope-fee-communication-coherence-risk-v0.1 | UK | Firm Intake | 2,021 | Employment | legal_actors | 3A | Scope: settlement agreement advice | Excludes: tribunal | Fixed fee £750 | Objective: sign | Work: drafted ET1 and negotiations for claim | Client comms show confusion about scope | Is engagement coherence intact. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | Work outside engagement and expectations misaligned. | billing_dispute_risk | 1 | Synthetic |
What this dataset does
You receive
scope text exclusions fee basis objective later work client comms
You decide
coherent or incoherent
Daily use
scope drift detection
fee term mismatch detection
missing variation letter risk
- Downloads last month
- 9