Dataset Viewer
Auto-converted to Parquet Duplicate
uid
string
dataset_id
string
jurisdiction
string
court_level
string
year
int64
area_of_law
string
pillar
string
series
string
input_client_request_summary
string
input_engagement_scope_summary
string
input_exclusions_summary
string
input_fee_model_summary
string
input_assumptions_summary
string
input_later_work_done_summary
string
input_scope_variation_record
string
input_flags
string
question
string
ground_truth_label
string
ground_truth_rationale
string
outcome_signal
string
early_window_months
int64
source_citation
string
EL-TR-001
legal-engagement-letter-scope-fee-assumption-coherence-risk-v0.1
UK
Firm Intake
2,023
Commercial
legal_actors
3A
Client requests pre-action debt recovery only
Scope: pre-action advice and LBA; negotiation
Exclude: issuing proceedings; enforcement
Fixed fee £2,500
Assumes documents supplied within 5 days
Work done: LBA and negotiation only
Variation: N/A
null
Is engagement coherence intact. Answer coherent or incoherent.
coherent
Scope fee and exclusions align with work.
stable
0
Synthetic
EL-TR-002
legal-engagement-letter-scope-fee-assumption-coherence-risk-v0.1
UK
Firm Intake
2,023
Commercial
legal_actors
3A
Client requests pre-action debt recovery only
Scope: assist with matter
Exclusions not stated
Hourly rates apply
Assumptions not stated
Work done: issued claim and billed
No written variation
Vague scope; scope creep
Is engagement coherence intact. Answer coherent or incoherent.
incoherent
Engagement vague and litigation billed without variation.
fee_dispute_risk
0
Synthetic
EL-TR-003
legal-engagement-letter-scope-fee-assumption-coherence-risk-v0.1
US
Firm Intake
2,022
Employment
legal_actors
3A
Client requests settlement negotiation only
Scope: demand response and settlement talks
Exclude: filing suit
Fee: hourly with budget cap $15k
Assumes opponent engages in mediation
Work: negotiation within cap
Variation: N/A
null
Is engagement coherence intact. Answer coherent or incoherent.
coherent
Clear scope and cap.
stable
0
Synthetic
EL-TR-004
legal-engagement-letter-scope-fee-assumption-coherence-risk-v0.1
US
Firm Intake
2,022
Employment
legal_actors
3A
Client requests settlement negotiation only
Scope: settlement negotiation
Exclude: none listed
Fee: hourly
Assumptions: none
Work: drafted complaint and filed
No variation
Out of scope filing
Is engagement coherence intact. Answer coherent or incoherent.
incoherent
Filed suit outside engaged scope.
fee_dispute_risk
1
Synthetic
EL-TR-005
legal-engagement-letter-scope-fee-assumption-coherence-risk-v0.1
UK
Firm Intake
2,022
Property
legal_actors
3A
Client requests disrepair protocol and negotiation
Scope: protocol letters; evidence collation
Exclude: court proceedings
Fee: staged fixed fees
Assumes inspection access granted
Work: protocol and negotiation only
Variation: N/A
null
Is engagement coherence intact. Answer coherent or incoherent.
coherent
Stays within protocol stage.
stable
0
Synthetic
EL-TR-006
legal-engagement-letter-scope-fee-assumption-coherence-risk-v0.1
UK
Firm Intake
2,022
Property
legal_actors
3A
Client requests disrepair protocol
Scope: protocol stage
Exclude: expert instruction unless agreed
Fee: fixed
Assumes access granted
Work: instructed expert and billed
No written variation
Excluded work billed
Is engagement coherence intact. Answer coherent or incoherent.
incoherent
Excluded expert step billed without signoff.
fee_dispute_risk
0
Synthetic
EL-TR-007
legal-engagement-letter-scope-fee-assumption-coherence-risk-v0.1
EU
Firm Intake
2,020
Commercial
legal_actors
3A
Client requests contract review and redlines
Scope: review and mark-up only
Exclude: negotiation calls beyond 2
Fee: fixed €4k
Assumes counterparty provides clean draft
Work: review and 2 calls only
Variation: N/A
null
Is engagement coherence intact. Answer coherent or incoherent.
coherent
Matches limits.
stable
0
Synthetic
EL-TR-008
legal-engagement-letter-scope-fee-assumption-coherence-risk-v0.1
EU
Firm Intake
2,020
Commercial
legal_actors
3A
Client requests contract review and redlines
Scope: review and mark-up
Exclude: none
Fee: hourly
Assumptions not stated
Work: 8 negotiation calls billed
No variation
Scope creep risk
Is engagement coherence intact. Answer coherent or incoherent.
incoherent
No limits or variation; high creep risk.
fee_dispute_risk
0
Synthetic
EL-TR-009
legal-engagement-letter-scope-fee-assumption-coherence-risk-v0.1
UK
Firm Intake
2,021
Employment
legal_actors
3A
Client requests ET1 drafting and filing
Scope: prepare ET1 and file
Exclude: hearing prep
Fee: fixed £1,800
Assumes documents provided promptly
Work: ET1 filed only
Variation: N/A
null
Is engagement coherence intact. Answer coherent or incoherent.
coherent
Scope and work match.
stable
0
Synthetic
EL-TR-010
legal-engagement-letter-scope-fee-assumption-coherence-risk-v0.1
UK
Firm Intake
2,021
Employment
legal_actors
3A
Client requests ET1 drafting and filing
Scope: assist with tribunal claim
Exclusions not stated
Fee: hourly
Assumptions none
Work: hearing prep billed heavily
No written variation
Vague scope; dispute likely
Is engagement coherence intact. Answer coherent or incoherent.
incoherent
Open-ended scope enables fee dispute.
fee_dispute_risk
1
Synthetic

What this dataset does

You receive

client request scope exclusions fee model assumptions later work variation record

You decide

coherent or incoherent

Daily use

scope creep detection

fee dispute prevention

engagement QC

Downloads last month
12