Datasets:
uid stringclasses 10
values | dataset_id stringclasses 1
value | jurisdiction stringclasses 3
values | court_level stringclasses 5
values | year int64 2.02k 2.02k | area_of_law stringclasses 3
values | pillar stringclasses 1
value | series stringclasses 1
value | input_document_summary stringclasses 10
values | input_pleaded_issues stringclasses 10
values | input_relevance_assessment stringclasses 7
values | input_privilege_basis stringclasses 8
values | input_redaction_scope stringclasses 7
values | input_custodian_and_scope_signals stringclasses 10
values | question stringclasses 1
value | ground_truth_label stringclasses 2
values | ground_truth_rationale stringclasses 10
values | outcome_signal stringclasses 4
values | early_window_months int64 0 5 | source_citation stringclasses 1
value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRP-TR-001 | legal-disclosure-relevance-privilege-coherence-triage-v0.1 | UK | High Court | 2,022 | Commercial | adjudicative_process | 2C | Email chain about pricing decision | Breach of contract on pricing | Directly relevant | No privilege asserted | No redaction | All key custodians searched | Is disclosure triage coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | Document directly maps to pleaded issue and no privilege applies. | stable | 0 | Synthetic |
DRP-TR-002 | legal-disclosure-relevance-privilege-coherence-triage-v0.1 | UK | High Court | 2,022 | Commercial | adjudicative_process | 2C | Internal memo on contract termination | Wrongful termination claim | Marked not relevant | Privilege claimed without legal advice context | Heavy redaction | Key decision maker omitted | Is disclosure triage coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | Relevant document withheld and privilege basis weak. | sanction_risk | 2 | Synthetic |
DRP-TR-003 | legal-disclosure-relevance-privilege-coherence-triage-v0.1 | US | Federal | 2,021 | Employment | adjudicative_process | 2C | HR investigation notes | Discrimination claim | Relevant to motive | Privilege claimed for legal advice portion | Redaction limited to advice | All custodians covered | Is disclosure triage coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | Partial privilege correctly applied with targeted redaction. | stable | 0 | Synthetic |
DRP-TR-004 | legal-disclosure-relevance-privilege-coherence-triage-v0.1 | US | Federal | 2,021 | Employment | adjudicative_process | 2C | Manager text messages | Retaliation claim | Marked irrelevant | No privilege basis | No redaction | Custodian search incomplete | Is disclosure triage coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | Relevant messages excluded from production. | adverse_inference_risk | 3 | Synthetic |
DRP-TR-005 | legal-disclosure-relevance-privilege-coherence-triage-v0.1 | UK | Tribunal | 2,023 | Employment | adjudicative_process | 2C | Performance review drafts | Unfair dismissal | Relevant context | No privilege | Light redaction for personal data | All custodians included | Is disclosure triage coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | Relevance recognised and privacy redaction proportionate. | stable | 0 | Synthetic |
DRP-TR-006 | legal-disclosure-relevance-privilege-coherence-triage-v0.1 | UK | Tribunal | 2,023 | Employment | adjudicative_process | 2C | Settlement discussion email | Whistleblowing claim | Relevant to knowledge | Privilege asserted but not lawyer involved | Full redaction | Senior manager emails missing | Is disclosure triage coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | Privilege asserted without proper basis and scope incomplete. | sanction_risk | 4 | Synthetic |
DRP-TR-007 | legal-disclosure-relevance-privilege-coherence-triage-v0.1 | EU | Commercial Court | 2,020 | Commercial | adjudicative_process | 2C | Board minutes on merger | Misrepresentation claim | Relevant | Privilege limited to legal advice segment | Redaction narrow | Custodian scope complete | Is disclosure triage coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | Relevance and privilege correctly balanced. | stable | 0 | Synthetic |
DRP-TR-008 | legal-disclosure-relevance-privilege-coherence-triage-v0.1 | EU | Commercial Court | 2,020 | Commercial | adjudicative_process | 2C | Project emails on delay | Delay damages claim | Marked irrelevant | No privilege | No redaction | Key engineer emails missing | Is disclosure triage coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | Relevant project communications excluded. | cost_risk | 5 | Synthetic |
DRP-TR-009 | legal-disclosure-relevance-privilege-coherence-triage-v0.1 | US | State | 2,019 | Tort | adjudicative_process | 2C | Maintenance logs | Negligence claim | Relevant | No privilege | No redaction | All custodians searched | Is disclosure triage coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | Logs directly relate to duty and breach. | stable | 0 | Synthetic |
DRP-TR-010 | legal-disclosure-relevance-privilege-coherence-triage-v0.1 | US | State | 2,019 | Tort | adjudicative_process | 2C | Insurance adjuster note | Liability dispute | Relevant | Privilege asserted broadly | Full withholding | Claims handler emails missing | Is disclosure triage coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | Overbroad privilege and missing custodians create risk. | sanction_risk | 3 | Synthetic |
What this dataset does
You receive
document summary issues pleaded relevance decision privilege basis redaction scope custodian coverage
You decide
coherent or incoherent
This mirrors daily disclosure review inside law firms.
- Downloads last month
- 11