Datasets:
uid stringclasses 10
values | dataset_id stringclasses 1
value | jurisdiction stringclasses 3
values | court_level stringclasses 5
values | year int64 2.02k 2.02k | area_of_law stringclasses 1
value | pillar stringclasses 1
value | series stringclasses 1
value | input_disclosure_duty stringclasses 9
values | input_material stringclasses 10
values | input_disclosure_timing stringclasses 9
values | input_defence_access stringclasses 9
values | input_prejudice_signal stringclasses 6
values | input_post_signal stringclasses 4
values | question stringclasses 1
value | ground_truth_label stringclasses 2
values | ground_truth_rationale stringclasses 10
values | outcome_signal stringclasses 4
values | early_window_months int64 0 24 | source_citation stringclasses 1
value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DC-TR-001 | legal-disclosure-coherence-breach-detection-v0.1 | UK | Crown Court | 2,019 | Criminal | adjudicative_process | 2C | Duty to disclose unused material undermining case | Witness statement contradicting timeline | Disclosed after trial start | Defence saw material late | Defence strategy disrupted | Appeal filed | Is disclosure behaviour coherent with duty. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | Late disclosure of undermining material breaks duty. | appeal_risk | 6 | Synthetic |
DC-TR-002 | legal-disclosure-coherence-breach-detection-v0.1 | UK | Crown Court | 2,020 | Criminal | adjudicative_process | 2C | Duty to disclose relevant material | CCTV and lab notes | Disclosed before trial | Full defence access | No prejudice | null | Is disclosure behaviour coherent with duty. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | Material disclosed in time with access. | stable | 0 | Synthetic |
DC-TR-003 | legal-disclosure-coherence-breach-detection-v0.1 | US | State Trial | 2,018 | Criminal | adjudicative_process | 2C | Brady duty | Alternate suspect evidence | Not disclosed | Defence unaware | Conviction obtained | Post conviction motion | Is disclosure behaviour coherent with duty. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | Failure to disclose exculpatory evidence. | post_conviction_risk | 18 | Synthetic |
DC-TR-004 | legal-disclosure-coherence-breach-detection-v0.1 | UK | Magistrates Court | 2,021 | Criminal | adjudicative_process | 2C | Duty to disclose key statements | All statements disclosed | Early disclosure | Defence reviewed fully | No prejudice | null | Is disclosure behaviour coherent with duty. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | Disclosure meets timing and completeness. | stable | 0 | Synthetic |
DC-TR-005 | legal-disclosure-coherence-breach-detection-v0.1 | US | Federal Trial | 2,017 | Criminal | adjudicative_process | 2C | Brady and Giglio duty | Impeachment material | Disclosed mid trial | Limited defence time | Cross limited | Appeal risk | Is disclosure behaviour coherent with duty. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | Timing prevented effective use. | appeal_risk | 5 | Synthetic |
DC-TR-006 | legal-disclosure-coherence-breach-detection-v0.1 | UK | Crown Court | 2,016 | Criminal | adjudicative_process | 2C | Duty to disclose forensic notes | Notes disclosed | Before trial | Defence expert reviewed | No prejudice | null | Is disclosure behaviour coherent with duty. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | Timely and accessible disclosure. | stable | 0 | Synthetic |
DC-TR-007 | legal-disclosure-coherence-breach-detection-v0.1 | UK | Crown Court | 2,022 | Criminal | adjudicative_process | 2C | Duty to disclose digital evidence | Phone extraction report | Late disclosure | Defence cannot test | Trial proceeds | Appeal filed | Is disclosure behaviour coherent with duty. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | Late digital disclosure undermines fairness. | appeal_risk | 7 | Synthetic |
DC-TR-008 | legal-disclosure-coherence-breach-detection-v0.1 | EU | Trial | 2,020 | Criminal | adjudicative_process | 2C | Duty to disclose witness interviews | Interviews disclosed | Pre trial | Defence access full | No prejudice | null | Is disclosure behaviour coherent with duty. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | Disclosure aligns with duty. | stable | 0 | Synthetic |
DC-TR-009 | legal-disclosure-coherence-breach-detection-v0.1 | US | State Trial | 2,015 | Criminal | adjudicative_process | 2C | Brady duty | Lab contamination report | Not disclosed | Defence unaware | Conviction secured | Later review | Is disclosure behaviour coherent with duty. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | Suppressed exculpatory contamination report. | wrongful_conviction_risk | 24 | Synthetic |
DC-TR-010 | legal-disclosure-coherence-breach-detection-v0.1 | UK | Crown Court | 2,021 | Criminal | adjudicative_process | 2C | Duty to disclose surveillance logs | Logs disclosed | Early | Defence reviewed | No prejudice | null | Is disclosure behaviour coherent with duty. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | Proper disclosure process. | stable | 0 | Synthetic |
What this dataset is
You receive disclosure duty material timing defence access prejudice signals
You decide
Does disclosure behaviour match the legal duty
Answer
coherent or incoherent
Why this matters
Many unsafe convictions arise from disclosure failure. This dataset measures the structural gap between duty and behaviour.
- Downloads last month
- 15